US20050054523A9

US20050054523A9 - Flue gas denitration catalyst and preparation process thereof

Info

Publication number: US20050054523A9
Application number: US10/705,365
Authority: US
Inventors: Shigeru Nojima; Kozo Iida; Yoshiaki Obayashi; Katsumi Nochi; Masashi Kiyosawa
Original assignee: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Current assignee: Mitsubishi Power Ltd
Priority date: 2003-03-14
Filing date: 2003-11-10
Publication date: 2005-03-10
Also published as: US7256155B2; US20040180783A1; JP2004275852A

Abstract

Provided are a flue gas denitration catalyst having high denitration activity and capable of suppressing a side reaction, that is, oxidation of SO₂; and a preparation process of the catalyst. The flue gas denitration catalyst comprises TiO₂, WO₃and V₂O₅. In the surface layer of the catalyst within 200 μm from the surface thereof, V₂O₅is supported on a carrier containing TiO₂and WO₃. The supported amounts of V₂O₅range from 0.4 to 5 wt. % based on the weight of the surface layer and range from 0.1 to 0.9 wt. % based on the total weight of the catalyst. The V₂O₅thus supported has a crystallite size of less than 10 nm as measured by X-ray diffraction. The catalyst can be available by preparing a mixture containing TiO₂and WO₃and having V₂O₅supported on the surface of an extruded product of the prepared mixture by a vapor phase method. The catalyst can be also available by having V₂O₅supported on a powder of the prepared mixture by a vapor phase method and having the resulting powder supported on the surface of a formed product.

Description

RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority from Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-069105 filed Mar. 14, 2003, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a flue gas denitration catalyst for the removal of nitrogen oxides from a flue gas of a combustion furnace such as large-sized boiler for electricity generation; and a preparation process of the catalyst.
A flue gas from a boiler usually contains nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides. One denitration method for such a flue gas is to add ammonia to the flue gas which passes over a catalyst composed mainly of titanium (Ti), tungsten (W), and vanadium (V) where nitrogen oxides are treated in accordance with the following reaction formula:
4NO+4NH₃+O₂→4N₂+6H₂O
A flue gas denitration catalyst can ordinarily be prepared by forming, into a monolithic honeycomb shape, a powdery catalyst obtained by supporting tungsten trioxide (WO₃) and vanadium pentoxide (V₂O₅) on a carrier of titanium dioxide (TiO₂) by impregnation. This preparation process however involves such a problem that an increase in the amount of V₂O₅, which is a main active component of the catalyst, improves denitration activity but it simultaneously enhances oxidation of sulfur dioxide which is a reaction as shown in the below-described reaction formula:
2SO₂+O₂→2SO₃.
There is therefore proposed a preparation process comprising forming a TiO₂powder into a honeycomb carrier, supporting WO₃on the resulting honeycomb carrier by an impregnation method and then supporting V₂O₅on the resulting carrier by a vapor phase method (refer to Japanese Examined Patent Publication No. 6-40957). Compared with the conventional catalyst which is obtained by impregnation and whose V₂O₅concentration is uniform even inside the bulk, the catalyst obtained by the above-described process can contain V₂O₅thinly and uniformly along the surface of the catalyst at a high concentration so that it is possible to promote the denitration reaction which proceeds sufficiently in the surface layer of the catalyst alone and to prevent the oxidation of SO₂occurring even inside the bulk.
Emission standards of nitrogen oxides are becoming more stringent, and flue gas denitration catalysts have to have higher denitration performance. In addition, in the denitration method employed particularly for the exhaust gas from a coal-fired boiler among various exhaust gases, catalysts capable of suppressing oxidation of SO₂which is a side reaction and having high denitration activity are required. Moreover, in the method as described in the above patent publication, it is difficult to form TiO₂into a monolithic honeycomb, because upon its formation, even if various binders are added to TiO₂, they fail to give sufficient strength to the TiO₂carrier.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In light of above-described problems, an object of the present invention is therefore to provide a flue gas denitration catalyst which has high denitration activity and is capable of suppressing the oxidation of SO₂which is a side reaction; and a preparation process of such a catalyst.
For satisfying the above-described object, a preparation process of a flue gas denitration catalyst according to the present invention comprises preparing a mixture containing titanium dioxide and tungsten trioxide, and having vanadium pentoxide supported on the surface of an extruded catalyst body or on a powder of the prepared mixture using a vapor phase method.
Extrusion of the mixture obtained by adding WO₃to TiO₂increases adhesion, thereby improving the denitration activity. By adopting a vapor phase approach, V₂O₅can be supported on the surface of the extruded catalyst body thinly and uniformly at a high concentration so that the oxidation of SO₂can be suppressed. Moreover, the addition of WO₃improves lubrication upon extrusion of the mixture and also compression strength of the extruded catalyst body.
Alternatively, with V₂O₅being supported on the powder of a TiO₂and WO₃mixture, adhesion between TiO₂and WO₃is increased, making it possible to improve the denitration activity of the catalyst. Further, by having the resulting powder supported on the surface of a formed product, V₂O₅exists only on the surface and the oxidation of SO₂can be suppressed. In such systems, a boiling bed type (ebullient bed type) or a moving bed type (fluidized bed type) is preferably employed for the vapor phase method.
In the preparation process of a flue gas denitration catalyst according to the present invention, titanium dioxide and tungsten trioxide in the mixture preferably exist as a complex oxide thereof. The vanadium source in the vapor phase method is preferably at least one compound selected from vanadium oxytrichloride, vanadium oxytribromide, vanadium pentachloride and vanadium dichloride. The above-described mixture further preferably contains silicon dioxide. Titanium dioxide, tungsten trioxide and silicon dioxide in the above-described mixture preferably exist as a complex oxide thereof.
In another aspect of the present invention, there is also provided a flue gas denitration catalyst available by preparing a mixture containing titanium dioxide and tungsten trioxide, and having vanadium pentoxide supported on the surface of an extruded catalyst body or on a powder of the prepared mixture using a vapor phase method. In addition, there is also provided a flue gas denitration catalyst available by further having the resulting powder supported on the surface of a formed product. The formed product preferably contains titanium dioxide, tungsten trioxide and vanadium pentoxide.
In the flue gas denitration catalyst of the present invention, titanium dioxide and tungsten trioxide in the above-described mixture preferably exist as a complex compound thereof. The amounts of vanadium pentoxide range preferably from 0.4 to 5 wt. % based on the surface layer of the denitration catalyst which has a thickness of 200 μm from its surface, and range from 0.1 to 0.9 wt. % based on the total weight of the catalyst. The crystallite size of the vanadium pentoxide supported by the vapor phase method is preferably less than 10 nm as measured by X-ray diffraction. The extruded catalyst body and the formed product have preferably a honeycomb shape. The above-described mixture preferably contains silicon dioxide. Titanium dioxide, tungsten trioxide and silicon dioxide in the above-described mixture preferably exist as a complex oxide thereof.
In a still further aspect of the present invention, there is also provided a flue gas denitration catalyst comprising titanium dioxide, tungsten trioxide and vanadium pentoxide, wherein the vanadium pentoxide is supported on a carrier containing titanium dioxide and tungsten trioxide in the surface layer of the catalyst which has a thickness of 200 μm from its surface; wherein the amounts of vanadium pentoxide range from 0.4 to 5 wt. % based on the weight of the surface layer, and range from 0.1 to 0.9 wt. % based on the total weight of the catalyst; and wherein the vanadium pentoxide on the carrier has a crystallite size of less than 10 nm as measured by X-ray diffraction.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

FIG. 1 is a schematic view illustrating the measuring method of crushing strength.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The embodiments of the present invention will next be described.

First Embodiment

A preparation process of a flue gas denitration catalyst according to a first embodiment of the present invention comprises extruding a mixture containing TiO₂and WO₃, and having V₂O₅supported on the surface of the extruded catalyst body using a vapor phase method.
As the mixture containing TiO₂and WO₃, a kneaded mixture of TiO₂and WO₃or a complex oxide of TiO₂and WO₃may be used. Use of a complex oxide of TiO₂and WO₃is particularly preferred, because it promotes denitration reactions, suppresses oxidation SO₂and facilitates extrusion into a honeycomb catalyst. The TiO₂:WO₃ratio by weight preferably ranges from 100:5 to 100:20, more preferably from 100:6 to 100:18. Adjustment to such a ratio not only suppresses the oxidation of SO₂but also improves an extrusion property into a monolithic honeycomb catalyst.
The further addition of SiO₂to the mixture is preferred. Addition of SiO₂increases the amount of a solid acid in the catalyst. An increase in the amount of a solid acid not only improves an adsorption rate of NH₃but also makes it possible to suppress adsorption of SO₂, so as to suppress the oxidation of SO₂which is a side reaction. When SiO₂is added, it is preferably added in the form of a complex oxide of TiO₂, SiO₂and WO₃, because if so, the denitration is promoted, the oxidation of SO₂is suppressed and the extrusion property into a honeycomb catalyst can be improved. The TiO₂:SiO₂ratio by weight preferably ranges from 100:1 to 100:15, more preferably from 100:3 to 100:10. By adjusting to a ratio within the above-described range, the resulting catalyst is capable of exhibiting the above-described properties. Various binders can be added to the mixture in order to facilitate extrusion.
No particular limitation is imposed on how the mixture is extruded and known extruders can be used. The extruded catalyst body thus obtained preferably has a monolithic honeycomb shape. The term “honeycomb shape” as used herein means not only regular hexagons in its cross-section but also squares. By forming the catalyst into a honeycomb shape, a specific surface area of the extruded catalyst body increases, leading to an improvement in the denitration performance.
As a method for having V₂O₅supported on the surface of the extruded catalyst body by the vapor phase method, a fixed bed system is preferred. For example, usable is a method of blowing a vanadium source, together with a carrier gas, into a reaction furnace set at high temperatures and feeding the surface of the extruded catalyst body with a vanadium vapor. As the vanadium source, vanadium oxytrichloride (VOCl₃), vanadium oxytribromide (VOBr₃), vanadium pentachloride (VCl₅) and vanadium dichloride (VCl₂) are preferred. Such vanadium sources are in the liquid or solid form at normal temperatures, but by converting them into the vapor phase, a vanadium component can be supported on the surface of the extruded catalyst body.
When VOCl₃is employed as the vanadium source, it reacts with the hydroxyl group (—OH) on the surface of TiO₂to form —OVOCl₂thereon. Then, the Cl is removed therefrom by calcination or hydrolysis, and —OVO(OH)₂is formed. When the —OVO(OH)₂formed in the surface of the catalyst is calcined, a monomolecular layer of V₂O₅can be formed uniformly. Thus, V₂O₅can be uniformly supported mainly on the surface of the extruded catalyst body by the vapor phase method.
The flue gas denitration catalyst thus obtained has V₂O₅mainly on the surface layer of the extruded catalyst body at a high concentration, and has little V₂O₅inside the bulk of the extruded catalyst body. It is therefore possible to promote the denitration reaction which proceeds sufficiently only in the surface layer of the extruded catalyst body and at the same time, to suppress the oxidation of SO₂which occurs also inside the bulk of the extruded catalyst body.
The amounts of V₂O₅preferably range from 0.4 to 5 wt. % based on the weight of the surface layer of the flue gas denitration catalyst which has a thickness of 200 μm from its surface and range from 0.1 to 0.9 wt. % based on the total weight of the catalyst. Since the amount of V₂O₅is 0.4 wt. % or greater based on the surface layer, the catalyst is capable of exhibiting high denitration activity. Since the amount is 5 wt. % or less, the oxidation of SO₂in the surface layer can be suppressed completely. The amount of V₂O₅based on the total weight of the catalyst is 0.1 wt. % or greater so that predetermined denitration performance is exhibited even if the supported amount of vanadium in the surface layer is not uniform. The amount is 0.9 wt. % or less so that the oxidation of SO₂inside the bulk can be suppressed completely. The supported amounts of V₂O₅more preferably range from 0.4 to 3 wt. % based on the weight of the surface layer and range from 0.1 to 0.3 wt. % based on the total weight of the catalyst.
The V₂O₅supported by the vapor phase method is finely pulverized so that it has high denitration activity compared with V₂O₅supported by conventional impregnation. The V₂O₅preferably has a crystallite size of less than 10 nm as measured by X-ray diffraction. Adjustment of the crystallite size of V₂O₅to less than 10 nm enables a drastic improvement in its denitration activity. The crystallite size of V₂O₅is more preferably 8 nm or less as measured by X-ray diffraction.

Second Embodiment

A preparation process of a flue gas denitration catalyst according to the second embodiment of the present invention comprises having V₂O₅supported on a powder mixture containing TiO₂and WO₃by a vapor phase method, and having the resulting powder supported on the surface of a formed product.
As the powder mixture containing TiO₂and WO₃, a mixture of TiO₂powder and WO₃powder or a complex oxide powder of TiO₂and WO₃is usable. The complex oxide powder of TiO₂and WO₃is particularly preferred. Addition of SiO₂to the powder mixture is also preferred as in the first embodiment, of which use of a complex oxide powder of TiO₂, SiO₂and SO₃is more preferred. A weight ratio of powders constituting the mixture is similar to that used in the first embodiment. Although no particular limitation is imposed on the average particle size of the powder, a range of from 0.1 μm to 30 μm is preferred.
In a similar manner to that employed in the first embodiment, V₂O₅can be supported on the powder by a vapor phase method. As well as the fixed bed system, a boiling bed system or a moving bed system can be adopted. Use of the boiling bed system or moving bed system enables continuous supporting of V₂O₅, so that V₂O₅can be supported efficiently to a large amount of powders.
The V₂O₅supported powder is supported on the surface of a formed product, for example, by converting the powder into a slurry, applying the slurry to the surface of the formed product and then drying. Although no particular limitation is imposed on the formed product insofar as it permits stable supporting of the V₂O₅supported powder on a carrier made of TiO₂and WO₃for a long period of time, the formed product composed mainly of TiO₂is preferred, of which the formed product composed of TiO₂and WO₃and optionally V₂O₅is more preferred, with the formed product having WO₃and V₂O₅supported thereon by impregnation being still more preferred. The formed product is preferably obtained in the monolithic honeycomb form by extrusion.
The flue gas denitration catalyst thus obtained has V₂O₅on the surface of the formed product at a high concentration, but has little V₂O₅inside the bulk of the formed product so that the denitration reaction which proceeds sufficiently only in the surface layer of the catalyst can be accelerated and at the same time, the oxidation of SO₂also inside the bulk of the catalyst can be suppressed.
Similar to the flue gas denitration catalyst available according to the first embodiment, the catalyst of the second embodiment preferably has V₂O₅supported thereon in an amount of from 0.4 to 5 wt. % based on the surface layer of the catalyst which has a thickness of 200 μm from its surface and in an amount of from 0.1 to 0.9 wt. % based on the total weight of the catalyst, of which amounts of from 0.4 to 3 wt. % based on the surface layer and from 0.1 to 0.3 wt. % based on the whole catalyst are more preferred, respectively. The V₂O₅supported in accordance with the vapor phase method is in the finely pulverized form as in the first embodiment. The crystallite size of V₂O₅is preferably less than 10 nm as measured by X-ray diffraction, with 8 nm or less being more preferred.

EXAMPLES

The present invention will be explained in more detail by way of examples, which are not intended to be limiting of the present invention.
Preparation of Catalyst

Example 1

An aqueous TiOSO₄solution (1500 g) having a concentration of 15% in terms of TiO₂was cooled to 20° C. or less. Then, the resulting solution was neutralized to pH 8 by adding 15% aqueous ammonia in portions. The titanium hydroxide precipitate thus obtained was washed with water and collected by filtration, whereby titanium hydroxide in the paste form was obtained. Ammonium paratungstate was added to the resulting titanium hydroxide paste (at a TiO₂:WO₃ratio by weight of 10:1), followed by sufficient kneading and mixing. The kneaded mass was dried, and calcined at 500° C. for 5 hours, whereby a TiO₂—WO₃complex oxide was obtained.
To 95 parts by weight of the complex oxide were added 5 parts by weight of glass fibers and 10 parts by weight of an organic binder (cellulose acetate). After the addition of water and sufficient mixing in a kneader, the reaction mixture was adjusted to have an adequate water concentration. The holes of a honeycomb extruder were adjusted to squares and the mixture was extruded into a honeycomb shape having an opening of 6.0 mm and a wall thickness of 1.0 mm. The extruded product was dried, and calcined at 500° C. for 3 hours.
The resulting calcined honeycomb was placed in a reaction furnace having a constant temperature of 400° C., followed by blowing thereinto VOCl₃, a compound which takes a liquid form at normal temperature, at 40 ml/min, while using N₂as a carrier gas. The calcined honeycomb was then fed for 20 minutes with the VOCl₃vapor generated by a fixed bed system. After the resulting calcined product was taken out from the reaction furnace, it was calcined for 3 hours in the air, whereby a honeycomb catalyst (Example 1) was obtained.
The V₂O₅distribution of this honeycomb catalyst was analyzed by an X-ray microanalyzer. The supported amounts of V₂O₅were 0.90 wt. % based on the surface layer within 200 μm from the surface of the honeycomb catalyst and 0.28 wt. % based on the total weight of the catalyst including also the inside of the bulk.

Examples 2 to 4

In a similar manner to that employed in Example 1 except the use of VOBr₃, VCl₅and VCl₂, instead of VOCl₃as the vanadium source, honeycomb catalysts (Examples 2 to 4) were obtained, respectively. As a result, in Examples 2 to 4, the supported amounts of V₂O₅were 0.84 wt. %, 0.92 wt. % and 0.83% based on the surface layer of the honeycomb catalyst; and 0.22%, 0.19 wt. % and 0.18 wt. % based on the whole catalyst, respectively.

Example 5

After a TiO₂—WO₃complex oxide was obtained as in Example 1, it was pulverized into a powdery complex oxide. The resulting powder (200 g) was filled in a boiling bed reactor (80 mm in diameter quartz cylindrical tube) and was confirmed to be boiled uniformly by an upflow. VOCl₃was added to an N₂gas heated to 400° C. and the resulting mixture was supplied to the filled layer from the downstream toward the upstream at 100 cc/min for 20 minutes. The resulting vanadium-supported powder was calcined in the air at 500° C. for 3 hours. The resulting powder was found to have 0.65 wt. % of V₂O₅uniformly. The powder thus obtained was designated as “powder catalyst (a)”.
A preparation process of honeycomb catalyst (c) to be used as a base material will next be described.
First, titanium hydroxide in the paste form was obtained in a similar manner to that employed in Example 1. It was then dried and calcined at 500° C. for 5 hours, and a TiO₂powder was prepared. The TiO₂powder thus obtained was extruded in a similar manner to that employed in Example 1, whereby a honeycomb TiO₂having an opening of 6.0 mm and a wall thickness of 1.0 mm was obtained. The resulting honeycomb TiO₂was impregnated with an aqueous solution of ammonium paratungstate, followed by drying and subsequent calcination at 500° C. for 3 hours. The resulting honeycomb of WO₃-supporting TiO₂was impregnated with an aqueous solution of ammonium metavanadate, followed by drying and subsequent calcination at 500° C. for 3 hours, and denitration catalyst (c) in the honeycomb form was obtained. Denitration catalyst (c) was composed of TiO₂, WO₃and V₂O₅at a ratio by weight of 91:8.9:0.1.
Powder catalyst (a) was supported on the honeycomb denitration catalyst (c) serving as a base material in the following manner. Water was added to powder catalyst (a) and the mixture was converted in a slurry in a wet ball mill. Powder catalyst (a) was applied to the surface of denitration catalyst (c) to give 100 g/cm²per surface area of denitration catalyst (c). After drying the catalyst thus applied, it was calcined at 500° C. for 3 hours, whereby a honeycomb catalyst (Example 5) was obtained.

Example 6

A moving bed reactor (a cylindrical tube of 60 mm in diameter, moved while rotating at 10 cm/min) was filled with 200 g of a powdery complex oxide obtained in a similar manner to that employed in Example 5. VOCl₃was added to an N₂gas heated to 400° C. and the mixture was fed to a reactor for 20 minutes. The vanadium-supporting powder thus obtained was calcined at 500° C. for 3 hours. It was found that on the resulting powder, 0.69 wt. % of V₂O₅was supported uniformly. The V₂O₅-supporting powder thus obtained was designated as powder catalyst (b). Powder catalyst (b) was applied to denitration catalyst (c) in a similar manner to that employed in Example 5. After drying, the catalyst thus applied was calcined at 500° C. for 3 hours, whereby a honeycomb catalyst (Example 6) was obtained.

Examples 7 and 8

In a similar manner to Example 1 except that the VOCl₃vapor was fed for 15 minutes and 30 minutes instead of 20 minutes, honeycomb catalysts (Examples 7 and 8) were obtained, respectively. In Examples 7 and 8, the supported amounts of V₂O₅were 0.75 wt. % and 0.98 wt. % based on the surface layer of the honeycomb catalysts; and 0.23 wt. % and 0.32 wt. % based on the whole catalysts, respectively.

Example 9

In a similar manner to Example 1 except that instead of preparation of a TiO₂—WO₃complex oxide, a TiO₂—SiO₂—WO₃complex oxide was prepared by adding silica sol (“Snowtex O”, trade name) to a titanium hydroxide paste at a T:Si ratio by weight of 10:1, a honeycomb catalyst (Example 9) was obtained. The supported amounts of V₂O₅were 0.80 wt. % based on the surface layer of the honeycomb catalyst and 0.24 wt. % based on the whole catalyst, respectively.

Example 10

In a similar manner to Example 1, titanium hydroxide was obtained in the paste form. The resulting titanium hydroxide paste was dried, and then calcined at 500° C. for 5 hours, and a TiO₂powder was prepared. In a similar manner to Example 1, the resulting TiO₂was extruded into a honeycomb shape. After measuring the saturated water content of the resulting honeycomb TiO₂, it was impregnated with an aqueous solution of ammonium paratungstate to support ammonium paratungstate on the honeycomb TiO₂to give a TiO₂:WO₃ratio by weight of 10:1. The impregnation was followed by drying and calcining at 500° C. for 3 hours, whereby WO₃was supported. The honeycomb WO₃-supporting TiO₂thus obtained was then impregnated with an aqueous solution of ammonium metavanadate. After drying, the resulting product was calcined at 500° C. for 3 hours. As a result of the analysis of the distribution condition of V₂O₅in the resulting honeycomb catalyst (Example 10), it was found that V₂O₅was supported uniformly in the catalyst from the surface to the inside of the bulk. The supported amounts of V₂O₅based on the surface layer and the whole catalyst were both 0.29 wt. %.
Denitration Performance Test
The honeycomb catalysts obtained in Examples 1 to 10 were subjected to a denitration performance test under the below-described conditions. The test results (denitration ratio, SO₂oxidation ratio) after treatment of a gas with these catalysts for 50 hours are shown in Table 1.
Shape of catalyst: honeycomb shape (volume: 2.5 L) of 5 cm×5 cm×100 cm
Gas flow rate: 25 Nm³/h (GHSV 10,000 h⁻¹)
Temperature: 350° C., 420° C.
molar ratio NH₃/NO: 1
Gas composition: NO: 200 ppm, NH₃: 200 ppm, SO₂:800 ppm, 02: 4%, CO₂: 12%, H₂O: 10%, N₂: balance
Measurement of Crystallite Size of V₂O₅
The crystallite size of V₂O₅supported on each of the honeycomb catalysts obtained in Examples 1 to 10 was determined in accordance with the Scherrer equation based on data obtained by the X-ray diffraction method. The results of the measurement are also shown in Table 1.
Measurement of Crushing Strength of Honeycomb Catalysts
Crushing strength was measured in accordance with the below-described method in order to find the strength of the honeycomb shape of each of the honeycomb catalysts obtained in Examples 1 to 10. The results are also shown in Table 1. For the measurement, a tensile/compression tester (“THK-TK18”, trade name; product of Tokyokoki Seizosho Ltd.) was employed.
(1) As illustrated in FIG. 1, a honeycomb catalyst 10 including the outside wall 12 was cut into a cube (5 cm×5 cm×5 cm).
(2) The honeycomb 10 was covered at upper and lower surfaces thereof with two cowl 20 (1 cm thick) a little wider than the surface of the honeycomb catalyst 10 and then packed in a vinyl bag.
(3) A primary crush value (kg) was measured by a tensile/compression tester.

(4) Crushing strength (kg/cm²) per unit area was calculated.

	TABLE 1


	Active component (V₂O₅)

Supported

Supporting

amount [wt. %]

Denitration

SO₂oxidation

Crushing

method

Surface

Whole

Crystallite

ratio [%]

strength

	Carrier	(system)	layer	catalyst	size [nm]	350° C.	420° C.	350° C.	420° C.	[kg/cm²]

Example 1	TiO₂.WO₃	Vapor phase	0.90	0.28	3	85	88	0.4	0.6	6.0
		(fixed bed)
Example 2	TiO₂.WO₃	Vapor phase	0.84	0.22	4	85	89	0.3	0.7	5.5
		(fixed bed)
Example 3	TiO₂.WO₃	Vapor phase	0.92	0.19	4	82	90	0.4	0.6	6.5
		(fixed bed)
Example 4	TiO₂.WO₃	Vapor phase	0.83	0.18	3	81	91	0.5	0.7	6.0
		(fixed bed)
Example 5	TiO₂.WO₃	Vapor phase	0.65	0.10	4	83	93	0.4	0.7	6.0
		(boiling bed)
Example 6	TiO₂.WO₃	Vapor phase	0.69	0.10	3	84	90	0.4	0.8	7.0
		(moving bed)
Example 7	TiO₂.WO₃	Vapor phase	0.75	0.23	3	86	90	0.4	0.7	7.5
		(fixed bed)
Example 8	TiO₂.WO₃	Vapor phase	0.98	0.32	3	87	89	0.5	0.7	7.0
		(fixed bed)
Example 9	TiO₂.SiO₂.WO₃	Vapor phase	0.80	0.24	4	86	88	0.4	0.6	6.5
		(fixed bed)
Example 10	TiO₂	Impregnation	0.29	0.29	10	78	77	1.0	2.0	3.5

As illustrated in Table 1, the honeycomb catalysts obtained in Examples 1 to 9 in which the supported amount of V₂O₅based on the surface layer of each catalyst within 200 μm from its surface was as high as about 0.6 to 1.0 wt. % and V₂O₅was finely pulverized with a crystallite size of 4 nm or less exhibited a denitration ratio as high as about 80 to 95%. The supported amount of V₂O₅based on the whole catalyst including the inside of the bulk was as low as about 0.1 to 0.35 wt. %, making it possible to suppress an SO₂oxidation ratio to as low as 0.3 to 0.8%. The honeycomb catalyst obtained in Example 10 in which the supported amounts of V₂O₅based on the surface layer and based on the whole catalyst were both 0.29% and had a crystallite size as large as 10 nm exhibited a denitration ratio of less than 80% and an SO₂oxidation ratio of 1.0% or greater. Thus, the desired performance was not attained by Example 10.
As illustrated in Table 1, the honeycomb catalysts of Examples 1 to 4 and 7 to 9 obtained by extruding a mixture of TiO₂and WO₃, and optionally SiO₂into a honeycomb shape exhibited excellent crushing strength of from 5.5 to 7.5 kg/cm². The honeycomb catalyst of Example 10 obtained by extrusion of only TiO₂exhibited crushing strength of 3.5 kg/cm²and the desired crushing strength was not attained.

Claims

1. A process for preparing a flue gas denitration catalyst, which comprises preparing a mixture containing titanium dioxide and tungsten trioxide; and having vanadium pentoxide supported on the surface of an extruded catalyst body or on a powder of the prepared mixture using a vapor phase method.

2. A process of claim 1, which further comprises having the resulting powder supported on the surface of a formed product.

3. A process of claim 1, wherein titanium dioxide and tungsten trioxide in the mixture exists in the form of a complex oxide thereof.

4. A process of claim 1, wherein a vanadium source in the vapor phase method is at least one compound selected from vanadium oxytrichloride, vanadium oxytribromide, vanadium pentachloride and vanadium dichloride.

5. A process of claim 1, wherein the mixture further contains silicon dioxide.

6. A process of claim 5, wherein titanium dioxide, tungsten trioxide and silicon dioxide in the mixture exists as a complex oxide thereof.

7. A process of claim 1, wherein the vapor phase method is a boiling bed system or moving bed system.

8. A flue gas denitration catalyst obtained by preparing a mixture containing titanium dioxide and tungsten trioxide, and then having vanadium pentoxide supported on the surface of an extruded catalyst body or on a powder of the prepared mixture using a vapor phase method.

9. A flue gas denitration catalyst of claim 8, which is obtained by further having the resulting powder supported on the surface of a formed product.

10. A flue gas denitration catalyst of claim 8, wherein titanium dioxide and tungsten trioxide in the mixture exists in the form of a complex oxide thereof.

11. A flue gas denitration catalyst of claim 8, wherein the supported amounts of vanadium pentoxide range from 0.4 to 5 wt. % based on the surface layer of the catalyst which has a thickness of 200 μm from its surface and range from 0.1 to 0.9 wt. % based on the total weight of the catalyst.

12. A flue gas denitration catalyst of claim 8, wherein vanadium pentoxide supported by the vapor phase method has a crystallite size of less than 10 nm as measured by X-ray diffraction.

13. A flue gas denitration catalyst of claim 8, wherein the catalyst body has a honeycomb shape.

14. A flue gas denitration catalyst of claim 9, wherein the formed product has a honeycomb shape.

15. A flue gas denitration catalyst of claim 8, wherein the mixture further contains silicon dioxide.

16. A flue gas denitration catalyst of claim 15, wherein titanium dioxide, tungsten trioxide and silicon dioxide in the mixture exists in the form of a complex oxide thereof.

17. A flue gas denitration catalyst of claim 9, wherein the formed product contains titanium dioxide, tungsten trioxide and vanadium pentoxide.

18. A flue gas denitration catalyst comprising titanium dioxide, tungsten trioxide and vanadium pentaoxide, wherein vanadium pentaoxide is supported on a carrier containing titanium dioxide and tungsten trioxide in the surface layer of the catalyst which has a thickness of 200 μm from its surface; wherein the supported amounts of vanadium pentoxide range from 0.4 to 5 wt. % based on the surface layer and range from 0.1 to 0.9 wt. % based on the total weight of the catalyst; and wherein vanadium pentoxide thus supported has a crystallite size of less than 10 nm as measured by X-ray diffraction.