US10248725B2 - Methods and apparatus for integrating search results of a local search engine with search results of a global generic search engine - Google Patents
Methods and apparatus for integrating search results of a local search engine with search results of a global generic search engine Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US10248725B2 US10248725B2 US14/992,232 US201614992232A US10248725B2 US 10248725 B2 US10248725 B2 US 10248725B2 US 201614992232 A US201614992232 A US 201614992232A US 10248725 B2 US10248725 B2 US 10248725B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- user
- search
- documents
- key word
- contacts
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 49
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000003058 natural language processing Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013475 authorization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002902 bimodal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/95—Retrieval from the web
- G06F16/951—Indexing; Web crawling techniques
-
- G06F17/30864—
-
- H04L67/22—
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/2866—Architectures; Arrangements
- H04L67/30—Profiles
- H04L67/306—User profiles
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/535—Tracking the activity of the user
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the field of item and peer recommendation algorithms directed towards industry professionals. More specifically, the present invention is aimed at enabling simultaneous search of public information sources and private information sources and providing combined search results.
- Such generic search engines have a few intrinsic advantages. For example, the user can use same search engine for private/consumer and professional/business search activity.
- the search query processing benefits from the large scale of such search engines both in terms of statistical tools applied to analyzing the query and the vast number of results which are indexed and available.
- the present invention provides methods and apparatus for integrating search results of a local search engine with search results of a global generic search engine when conducting a search query on a generic search engine.
- the present invention enables simultaneous searching of public information sources and private information sources.
- private information sources include existing private search engines, local networks, expert networks, internal directories (e.g., LinkedIn, company directories, user contact files, and the like), private domains, private research databases, private informational databases, private recommendation engines used for returning documents and/or expert recommendations in response to the search query, and other private information sources, whether residing behind a firewall or which have access requirements (e.g., user name and password, authorization codes, or the like).
- the present invention assumes that such private information sources exist and can be or are already indexed.
- a global search conducted using a generic search engine such as Google, Bing, Yahoo, or other known search engine will also provide results from the private information sources.
- Any required access information, such as user names or passwords, click through agreements, authorization codes, or the like are provided in advance by the user for use by the software module to automatically access the private information sources in connection with the search.
- the user may initiate a public search using key words and a generic browser or other public search box.
- the key words entered into the browser or search box are also sent to a private information source, such as a private search or recommendation engine (e.g., such as those developed by Gartner, Inc. and Senexx, Inc.).
- the access information for accessing the recommendation engine or other private data sources are automatically entered such that, while the generic browser executes the search, the key words are simultaneously mapped (or if a natural language search string is used, the search string concepts are processed, mapped, and/or weighted instead) to the expert network ontology and/or documents or processed using the recommendation engine.
- the recommendation engine can then determine the best experts and/or documents to return for the key words and/or concepts from the non-public data, leveraging the user's profile information (whether explicit and/or implicit).
- the search results are then presented together with the results obtained by the generic search engine and returned to the user (in a federated or non-federated manner).
- a computerized method for simultaneously searching public and private information sources is provided.
- a user implements a key word search of a public search engine via a web browser.
- the same key word search is automatically implemented of a private information source to locate at least one of user contacts and documents relevant to the key word search.
- the at least one of the user contacts and the documents returned from the private information source may be scored for relevancy to the key word search.
- Public search results are returned to the user based on the key word search of the public search engine.
- up to N most relevant of the at least one of the user contacts and the documents obtained from the private information source may be returned to the user in a side bar of the web browser adjacent to the public search results.
- the private information source may comprise one of a private search engine, information residing on a local network, an expert network, an internal directory, a private domain, a private research database, a private information database, a document recommendation engine, an expert recommendation engine, or the like.
- the method may further comprise enabling access to the private information source by automatically logging into the private information source using stored access information for the private information source.
- the method may also comprise connecting to external user accounts and analyzing the external user accounts to locate information comprising at least one of the user contacts, contact information, documents associated with the user contacts, and the like.
- the user contacts, the contact information, and the documents (and any other relevant information) may then be indexed and stored.
- the information may be extracted from the external accounts and tagged to indicate important topics or areas of strength of the corresponding contact.
- the information extracted from the external accounts may comprise at least one of contact name, photo, bio, experience summary, skill set, background, associated groups or affiliations, or the like.
- the private information source may comprise a recommendation system.
- an implicit profile of the user may be created or updated with the indexed user contacts, the indexed contact information, the indexed documents, and the like.
- the implicit profile may also comprise user-related information derived from tracking the user's behavior on at least one of one or more electronic devices, an electronic communications network, a website used to access the recommendation system, and the like.
- the user-related information derived from the user behavior may be analyzed to extract or derive key words therefrom which may be used to characterize user interests, expertise, skills, and the like.
- the key words may be stored in a profiles database as the implicit profile.
- the user's actions on the web browser used to implement the key word search may be tracked.
- the user's implicit profile may be updated based on the user's actions.
- Such user actions may comprise at least one of key word searches entered, the public search results viewed by the user, the user contacts from the private information source contacted, the documents returned from the private information source viewed by the user, and the like.
- At least one of the indexing of the user contacts, the contact information, and the documents, and the updating of the implicit profile may occur at least one of periodically, at user login to the private information source, and upon a change in one of the user external accounts.
- the period of the indexing and updating may be configurable by the user or a system administrator.
- the user contacts may comprise direct user contacts and indirect user contacts obtained or derived from the direct user contacts.
- the scoring of the user contacts and the documents returned from the private information source may further comprise ordering of the user contacts and the documents by relevancy to key words or topics derived from at least one of the key word search or the public search results.
- the key words or topics may be extracted from the at least one of the key word search and the public search results using natural language processing techniques.
- the user contacts or the documents with relevancy to more than one of the topics or key words may be scored higher than the user contacts or the documents having relevancy to only one of the topics or key words.
- the method may further comprise storing information relating to the topics and key words in a database of the recommendation system.
- the recommendation system may comprise at least one of a document database for the documents or an expert database identifying experts and corresponding areas of expertise. In addition to returning the user contacts and/or documents from the private information source, identifying information for the experts obtained from the expert database which are relevant to the key word search may be returned to the user.
- the method may further comprise deriving one or more topics from the key word search and expanding the scope of the search of the private information source to include at least one parent or child topics corresponding to the one or more topics.
- the at least one of the parent or the child topics may be obtained from a taxonomy database comprised of stored topics together with the parent and the child topics corresponding thereto in a hierarchical relationship.
- the user contacts or the documents returned using the at least one of the parent or the child topics may be weighted less than the user contacts or the documents returned from the key word search.
- the user contacts which have a perceived or express willingness to cooperate may be scored higher than other of the user contacts.
- the willingness to cooperate may be determined by at least one of the user contact being from one of a same company, team, or company level as the user, the user contact having an available communication channel, the user contact having a past history of cooperation, the user contact being obtained from direct contacts of the user, and the like.
- the method may further comprise, for each of the up to N of the user contacts, displaying in the side bar of the web browser at least one of a name of the user contact, contact information, embedded links for contacting the contact via email, instant messaging, texting, or telephone, a photo, a bio, a summary of the contact's relevancy to the key word search, an experience summary, a skill set description, a background summary, a listing of associated groups or affiliations, and the like.
- the key word search of the private information source may be implemented via a software widget associated with the web browser or via a specialized web browser adapted to access the private information source.
- the present invention also encompasses a computerized system for simultaneously searching public and private information sources.
- the system may comprise a web browser enabling a user to implement a key word search of a public search engine and a software application associated with the web browser for accessing a private information source and implementing the key word search of the private information source to locate at least one of user contacts and documents relevant to the key word search.
- the private information source may be adapted to score the at least one of the user contacts and the documents returned from the key word search for relevancy to the key word search.
- the public search results obtained from the key word search of the public search engine may be displayed on the web browser.
- up to N most relevant of the at least one of the user contacts and the documents obtained from the private information source may be displayed in a side bar of the web browser adjacent to the public search results.
- the private information source may comprise a recommendation system.
- the recommendation system may be provided with access information for connecting to external user accounts.
- the recommendation system may access the external user accounts to locate at least one of the user contacts, contact information, documents associated with the user contacts, and the like.
- the recommendation system may then index the user contacts, the contact information, the documents and other relevant information, and store the indexed user contacts, the indexed contact information, the indexed documents, and the like.
- the system may include other features and functionality as described above in connection with the example method embodiments.
- the system may record user clicks and provide feedback to the recommendation engine, and this information may be used to update the user's explicit and/or implicit profiles.
- the user's implicit profile may comprise user-related information derived from tracking the user's behavior on at least one of one or more electronic devices, an electronic communications network, and a website used to access a recommendation engine and analyzing the user-related information derived from the user behavior to extract or derive key words therefrom which are used to characterize user interests, expertise, and skills, and storing the key words in a profiles database as the implicit profile.
- the system may track the user's actions on the web browser used to access the system or the public search engine.
- the user's implicit profile may be updated based on the user's actions.
- the user's actions may comprise at least one of the key word searches entered, the public search results viewed, the user contacts from the private information source contacted, the documents obtained from the private information source viewed, and the like.
- local NLP based search logic running on the recommendation engine or other private information source
- the public search results e.g., the Google subject line of the result and related snippet, and/or potentially the full result page
- the search can then be run again on the recommendation engine or other private information source with this expanded concept tree and offer an improved local and expert result set.
- the expanded concept tree or information related thereto can be stored in the corresponding local database to enhance the database (e.g., the recommendation engine can learn from the public search result and can use this data to improve future searches of the recommendation engine database).
- the present invention also encompasses embodiments in which a recommendation engine is not present, and instead the search results from private data sources are returned using an application program interface that connects with the private data sources and obtains the search results, without passing through a recommendation engine for optimization of the search results.
- a recommendation engine with the present invention is advantageous as it enables optimization of the search results as well as self-learning and constant updating of the recommendation engine database.
- the present invention provides a significant advantage by allowing a local private search to ride on a global/public generic search.
- the present invention allows a user to initiate their search in a generic public search engine, provides the user with a global set of answers using globally optimized generic logic, and also provides the user with a local set of answers obtained from private information sources, including experts and/or documents, using locally optimized logic.
- the present invention leverages the statistical accuracy and richness of the global generic search to improve and iterate the local search concept tree and/or similar logic components.
- the system requires the user to implement a local search widget or the like in their browser, or a specialized browser. It also assumes a generic/public search engine is available.
- the recommendation engine may include or comprise an example of a locally optimized NLP search implementation (such as the “Senexx People Search” or the SolvePath document search methodology, both provided by Senexx, Inc.).
- the present invention may also be expanded to non-public search boxes, e.g., to an intranet search box or a particular domain search box as well (e.g., such that the widget or software module is implemented in the non-public/domain specific search box and returns results not only from that non-public search but from other private information sources as well).
- non-public search boxes e.g., to an intranet search box or a particular domain search box as well (e.g., such that the widget or software module is implemented in the non-public/domain specific search box and returns results not only from that non-public search but from other private information sources as well).
- the invention may be implemented such that a local search on a recommendation engine or on one or more private information sources initiates a simultaneous search using a public search engine.
- the search string instead of entering a search string in a Google search box and having public and private information sources searched, the search string can be entered into a private search engine with both private and public search results being returned.
- the widget or software module can be implemented in one or more private search boxes and can be configured to access one or more public search engines and/or one or more additional private information sources.
- FIG. 1 shows a flow chart of an example embodiment of a search process combining global and local search result in accordance with the present invention
- FIG. 2 shows an example embodiment of the presentation of search results in accordance with the present invention
- FIG. 3 shows a flow chart of an example embodiment of a sub-process for indexing external user account data in accordance with the present invention
- FIG. 4 shows a flow chart of an example embodiment of a sub-process for searching for relevant people in a set of user contacts in accordance with the present invention
- FIG. 5 shows a flowchart of an example embodiment of sub-process for ordering of user contacts by relevancy using concept tree expansion principles
- FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of an example embodiment of a system in accordance with the present invention.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an example embodiment of simultaneous searching of public information sources and private information sources in accordance with the present invention.
- a private search network source exists, such as private search engines, information residing on private local networks, expert networks, internal directories, private domains, private research databases, private information databases, and document and expert recommendation engines as discussed above, for returning documents and/or expert recommendations in response to the search query, and assumes that such private information sources can be or are already indexed.
- Such private network information sources such as document and expert recommendation engines, are well-known.
- Most such systems employ a profile database which stores an explicit profile of each of the users of the system.
- An explicit profile may include information that generally defines the user based on the user's direct input into the system. This is usually derived from registration forms where the user has input his industry experience, job titles and duty descriptions, size of company, company name, projects he is working on, vendors he is working with, etc.
- Recommendation engines of the type developed by Gartner, Inc. and Senexx, Inc. use not only an explicit profile of the user but also an implicit profile of the user derived from a user's behavior, for example from tracking a user's actions on one or more electronic devices and/or on the web site used to access the inventive system.
- non-personalized document and expert recommendation engines i.e., those that do not utilize user profiles
- non-personalized document and expert recommendation engines i.e., those that do not utilize user profiles
- a user 10 may implement ( 12 ) a key word search of a public search engine via a web browser (e.g., running on user device 11 ). Simultaneously, the same key word search is automatically implemented ( 16 ) of a private information source to locate at least one of user contacts and documents relevant to the key word search. The at least one of the user contacts and the documents returned from the private information source are scored ( 17 ) for relevancy to the key word search. The public search results are returned ( 18 ) to the user based on the key word search of the public search engine. Up to N most relevant of the at least one of the user contacts and the documents obtained from the private information source are also returned ( 19 ) to the user in a side bar of the web browser adjacent to the public search results.
- documents should be understood to mean any one of articles, white papers, information texts, published documents, books, research papers, web pages, reports, manuals, spreadsheets, presentations, pamphlets, brochures, user manuals, product instructions, product descriptions, specifications, reviews, thesis papers, journals, blogs, RFPs, proposals, press releases, or other written text that may be maintained or stored in electronic form.
- the system may connect ( 24 ) to external user accounts (provided access is granted for each such external user account, including any necessary access information such as user name and password, authentication codes, and the like), such as LinkedIn, Google, and the like and analyze the external user accounts to locate information comprising at least one of the user contacts, contact information, and documents associated with the user contacts. This information from the external accounts may then be indexed ( 26 ) (explained in detail below in connection with FIG. 2 ).
- the resulting indexed data may be used to create or update the user's profile (explicit or implicit), and stored in a profiles database 28 used by the recommendation engine.
- the indexing of the external account data and corresponding updating of the user's profile(s) may occur periodically, at user login, after user action is taken with regard to an external account (e.g., updating, adding, or deleting a contact or modifying any other information field, and the like), and the like.
- the profiles database 28 may contain individual user profiles, including both explicit and implicit profiles for each user.
- the implicit profile for each user (stored in the profiles database 28 ) may also comprise user-related information derived from tracking the user's behavior on at least one of one or more electronic devices (e.g. user device 11 ), an electronic communications network, a website used to access the recommendation system, and the like.
- the user-related information derived from the user behavior may be analyzed to extract or derive key words therefrom which may be used to characterize user interests, expertise, skills, and the like.
- the key words may be stored in the profiles database 28 as the implicit profile.
- the user's actions on the web browser used to implement the key word search may be tracked.
- the user's implicit profile may be updated based on the user's actions.
- Such user actions may comprise at least one of key word searches entered, the public search results 18 viewed by the user, the user contacts from the private information source contacted, the documents returned from the private information source viewed by the user, and the like.
- the user login ( 22 ) to the private information source or recommendation engine may require physical user action such as entering a user name and password (e.g., via user device 11 ), or may be an auto-login implemented by a browser plugin application using stored access information for the private information source.
- a browser plugin application e.g., a browser plugin application using stored access information for the private information source.
- the user can be automatically logged in to the private information source or recommendation engine once the browser is opened by the user, such that a global search conducted using a generic search engine such as Google, Bing, Yahoo, or other known search engine will also initiate a search on the private information source/recommendation engine.
- a pop-up menu may appear asking permission for linking to the private information source or recommendation engine, giving the user a choice whether or not to implement the dual search aspects of the present invention.
- a “relevant people/document view” side bar may be added ( 14 ) to the browser display.
- a public search on the browser e.g., using Google, Yahoo, Bing, or the like
- the search query is also analyzed simultaneously ( 16 ) by the private information source/recommendation engine and people (known contacts of the user) relevant to the search query are determined (e.g., from the user's profile database 28 ) and returned and displayed, for example in the relevant people view sidebar.
- the side bar may comprise a relevant document view instead of or in addition to the relevant people view side bar.
- the private information source/recommendation engine may return relevant documents from the indexed documents stored in the profiles database 28 , from a private document database 29 or other private information sources, and populate the relevant document view with titles from and links to such relevant documents.
- the private document database 29 may comprise a recommendation engine document database. The recommendation engine may conduct a search of its entire document database 29 for documents relating to the search query and/or for documents associated with the user or the user's contacts in the user's profiles database 28 related to the search query.
- FIG. 2 shows a sample web browser page 30 with public search results 32 from a Google search for the key words “Digital Marketing” presented in the main portion of the web page 30 , with a “people view” sidebar 34 showing contacts returned from an independent search of one or more private information sources that are relevant to the same key words.
- a “document view” sidebar (not shown) may be presented in a similar manner, or combined with the “people view” sidebar 34 .
- a menu selection may be provided on the top of the sidebar 34 to enable toggling between people and documents returned by the search of the private information sources.
- the user is thus able to see not only the public search results 32 returned by the browser, but also relevant people and/or documents 34 returned by the recommendation engine or other private search engine.
- the relevant people view sidebar 34 may provide the user with one or more of each person's name, contact information, a photo of the person, a short bio, a summary of the person's relevancy to the search query, an experience summary, a skill set description, a background summary, a listing of associated groups or affiliations, and the like.
- the user may then be able to initiate contact with a person selected from the sidebar by using corresponding embedded links provided for initiating various forms of communication, such as email, telephone, texting, instant messaging, and the like.
- document titles may be listed in the sidebar 34 together with a brief summary or description, and the user can select documents from the document sidebar to open, download, print, and/or forward (e.g., via email) to another user or account.
- FIG. 3 illustrates an example embodiment of the sub-process for indexing external account data in accordance with the present invention.
- the system e.g., the recommendation engine/enrichment system, or other private information source
- the user's external accounts such as LinkedIn, Google, Yahoo, and the like (with access thereto previously granted by the user) may also be connected ( 38 ) to the system.
- the external accounts may then be analyzed ( 40 ) to find all of the user's contacts or connections.
- the system can not only locate all of the user's direct contacts (first circle of contacts), but also any indirect contacts derived from the first circle contacts (second circle of contacts), and so on.
- Relevant information ( 42 ) from these contacts can be extracted (e.g., name, photo, bio, experience summary, skill set, background, groups associated with, affiliations, and the like).
- the external accounts can also be analyzed to locate documents associated with the contacts.
- the extracted data (contacts, contact information, documents, and the like) may then be tagged ( 44 ) to indicate important topics or areas of strength for each contact.
- the extracted and expanded data may then be indexed ( 46 ) in the profiles database 28 , creating profiles for each of the user's contacts, and each such profile can be linked to the user's profile.
- the user's own contact information from external accounts can be imported into or associated with the user's profile. This information may be part of the user's explicit profile and/or implicit profile.
- FIG. 4 illustrates an example embodiment of the sub-process for finding relevant people from the indexed contact information in the profiles database 28 .
- the contacts may be ordered ( 52 ) by relevancy to the search query using People Search Logic (such as Senexx People Search Logic, described in detail below in connection with FIG. 5 ).
- People Search Logic such as Senexx People Search Logic, described in detail below in connection with FIG. 5 .
- the search results ( 18 ) from the public data source returned in response to the search query 54 may also be used in determining relevancy of the contacts and/or documents.
- Topics and key words may be extracted ( 56 ) from search query 54 and/or the search results 18 using Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques and the contacts can be analyzed ( 52 ) for relevancy to the topics.
- NLP Natural Language Processing
- a scoring algorithm may be used to score the topics for relevancy to the search query 54 and to order the user's contacts with respect thereto.
- Parent/child expansion 58 of the topics may be employed to expand the scope of the people search (as discussed below in connection with FIG. 5 ), and different weights or scoring may be applied to parents or children of the original topic and people located based on parent/child topic relevancy as compared to relevancy to the original topic.
- the resulting relevant contact information may be stored 60 in the profiles database 28 and used to update the user's profile(s) to provide for system self-learning.
- the system may then output ( 19 ) the top N most relevant people/contacts located during the people search, together with the data to be shown in the relevant people view sidebar 34 as discussed above in connection with FIGS. 1 and 2 .
- FIG. 5 illustrates an example embodiment of a people search sub-process.
- the initial user set 62 of all the user's contacts may be obtained.
- This initial user set 62 may include the user's contacts from all external accounts, such as LinkedIn, Google, Yahoo, any peer connections within the recommendation engine, personnel listings from the user's company, email contacts, social network contacts, and the like.
- the initial user set may be ordered and filtered or scored for relevancy to the search topics 64 (e.g., topics derived from the search query 54 (also referred to herein as “key word search”) or the results 18 returned by the search query as discussed above in connection with FIG. 4 ) and scored or weighted 66 according to the topics they are found to be relevant to.
- search topics 64 e.g., topics derived from the search query 54 (also referred to herein as “key word search”
- key word search also referred to herein as “key word search”
- a higher score or weighting may be provided to contacts who are found to be relevant to a main topic (e.g., a highest weighted topic as determined by relevancy to the search query 54 or search results 18 ) than those contacts found to be relevant to lesser weighted sub-topics.
- Contacts with relevancy to more than one topic or key words may be scored higher than those found relevant to only one topic or key word.
- the extent of the relevancy of the contact to a topic is also considered in the scoring, as is the relevancy of the contact to the user (e.g., a first level contact is weighted higher than a second level contact, a company contact is weighted higher than an outside the company contact, etc.).
- a determination ( 68 ) can then be made as to whether enough (e.g., a predetermined number N) relevant contacts have been found. If enough relevant contacts are not found, one or more further iterations of the search may be run. For example, if sufficient relevant contacts are not located after the initial search, the topics may be expanded ( 72 ) to include parents of the topics. For example, a topic derived from the search query and search results may be “commercial banking”. If the search does not reveal a sufficient number of contacts with commercial banking experience, the commercial banking topic may be expanded to a parent topic, e.g., “banking”. The contacts are then analyzed again to find any relevant to banking. If a sufficient number of contacts are not located during this process, a parent of “banking” may be used in the search.
- the search may be expanded further ( 76 ) to include children of the original topic (in this case, for example, the child of “commercial banking” may be “commercial bank loans”).
- the search results may be aggregated 67 with the search results from the prior search or searches (if any).
- the system may default ( 78 ) back to a simple search (e.g., providing only the unfiltered key word search results from the local/private search engine without using topic-based parent/child searching and without using algorithms for sorting or weighting, etc.), and either return no relevant contacts or return any contacts found relevant in the preceding steps even though the predetermined number N of relevant contacts were not located.
- a simple search e.g., providing only the unfiltered key word search results from the local/private search engine without using topic-based parent/child searching and without using algorithms for sorting or weighting, etc.
- a taxonomy database 80 may be provided with stored topics and parents and children of the topics in a hierarchical relationship. When the original topic needs to be expanded to parent or child topics for use in matching relevant contacts, such parent or child topics can be obtained from the taxonomy database.
- the taxonomy database may be updated periodically.
- the relevancy scores of the contacts can be boosted/adjusted ( 82 ) according to the topic parents (hypernyms) for each level of expansion (with each additional level being given a reduced boost coefficient).
- the relevancy scores of the contacts can be boosted/adjusted ( 84 ) based according to the topic children (hyponyms) for each level of expansion (with each additional level being given a reduced boost coefficient).
- the user contacts (or the documents) returned using the at least one of the parent or the child topics are weighted less than the user contacts or the documents returned initially from the key word search.
- the relevancy scores of the contact can be boosted ( 86 ) based on a perceived or expressly indicated willingness to cooperate. For example, a contact from the same company of the user, same team as the user, same level in the company as the user, having an available communication channel, having a past history of cooperation, within the user's first circle of contacts, and the like may be deemed to have a certain level of willingness to cooperate.
- the top N best matches of contacts are returned ( 19 ) and added to the relevant people view side bar 34 as discussed above.
- the contacts may comprise experts relevant to the key word search returned by the recommendation engine.
- a similar process can be implemented for returning relevant documents with weightings based on relevancy for populating the relevant document view side bar.
- An example of a document recommendation system is set forth in Gartner, Inc.'s U.S. Pat. No. 8,661,034 entitled Bimodal Recommendation Engine for Recommending Items and Peers, which is incorporated herein and made a part hereof by reference for all purposes.
- the documents returned can be sorted and filtered for relevancy in much the same way as described above for the relevant contacts, with relevancy and scoring/weighting determined with respect to one or more of the key word search, topics derived from the key word search and the search results, and topics obtained through parent/child expansion as discussed in connection with FIG. 5 .
- FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of an example embodiment of a system 100 in accordance with the present invention.
- the user 10 has access ( 101 ) to various private information sources 102 (as discussed above), which may be indexed ( 103 ) by the enrichment system/recommendation engine 104 (as discussed above).
- the user 10 may provide permissions ( 105 ) to the enrichment system 104 to access the private information sources 102 to enable indexing, searching, periodic updating, and the like.
- Such indexed data and related information for each user may be stored in a database 106 associated with the enrichment system, together with other data typically found in such systems (including but not limited to stored data from past searches, explicit and implicit user profile information, documents, and the like).
- the system may be used to provide the combined public and private search results as discussed above.
- the user 10 may access 108 a public search engine 110 using an Internet browser from any Internet enabled user device 11 (e.g., laptop computer, tablet computer, desktop computer, smartphone, smartwatch, or other similar device), and enter a search query.
- a software application running on the user device 11 may be used to implement a widget or the like in the browser, or a specialized browser may be implemented, providing the people view and/or document view sidebar and linking the search query into the private information source and/or the recommendation engine.
- the search query is simultaneously sent 109 , 111 to both the public search engine 110 and the private search engine (enrichment system/recommendation engine) 104 .
- the public results 113 and private results 114 are then returned 116 by the public and private search engines, respectively, and simultaneously displayed on the browser (e.g., as discussed above in connection with FIG. 2 ).
- the public search results may be analyzed 115 and used to further enhance the private search results, as discussed above in connection with FIG. 4 .
- the recommendation engine 104 and the private information source 102 may be separate entities as shown in FIG. 6 or that they may be combined into a single entity. Search results may be returned from one or both of the recommendation engine 104 and the private information source 102 , and the system may likewise be implemented with both or only one of the recommendation engine 104 and the private information source 102 .
- the user device 11 may comprise any type of network or Internet enabled device having a processor, memory, and a user interface which is capable of running a web browser, such as a computer, a laptop computer, a table computer, a smartphone, a smartwatch, or any other type of network enabled computing device.
- the user device 11 , the private information source 102 , the recommendation engine 104 , and the public search engine 110 may be connected via a network 120 .
- the network 120 may comprise one or more of the Internet, a private network, a local area network, a wide area network, or the like.
- FIG. 6 is only one possible implementation of the present invention, and that present invention may be implemented in various different combinations of hardware and software.
- the recommendation engine described in Gartner, Inc.'s U.S. Pat. No. 8,661,034 may be modified to obtain and index the user contact information and documents as discussed in connection with FIG. 3 above.
- the present invention provides advantageous methods and apparatus for simultaneously searching public and private networks and returning search results from both sources.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (23)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/992,232 US10248725B2 (en) | 2015-06-02 | 2016-01-11 | Methods and apparatus for integrating search results of a local search engine with search results of a global generic search engine |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201562169591P | 2015-06-02 | 2015-06-02 | |
US14/992,232 US10248725B2 (en) | 2015-06-02 | 2016-01-11 | Methods and apparatus for integrating search results of a local search engine with search results of a global generic search engine |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20160357756A1 US20160357756A1 (en) | 2016-12-08 |
US10248725B2 true US10248725B2 (en) | 2019-04-02 |
Family
ID=57451510
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/992,232 Active 2036-12-30 US10248725B2 (en) | 2015-06-02 | 2016-01-11 | Methods and apparatus for integrating search results of a local search engine with search results of a global generic search engine |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US10248725B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11392595B2 (en) | 2006-10-26 | 2022-07-19 | EMB Partners, LLC | Techniques for determining relevant electronic content in response to queries |
US10601747B2 (en) * | 2015-10-05 | 2020-03-24 | Oath Inc. | Method and system for dynamically generating a card |
US10176232B2 (en) * | 2016-03-01 | 2019-01-08 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Blending enterprise content and web results |
CN110462605A (en) * | 2016-12-22 | 2019-11-15 | 酷旺 | Method for the method for terminal user locally dissected and for searching for personal information |
FR3061328A1 (en) * | 2016-12-22 | 2018-06-29 | Qwant | METHOD FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION |
KR20190089384A (en) | 2018-01-22 | 2019-07-31 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Electronic device and method for processing search word thereof |
CN113010585A (en) * | 2021-04-20 | 2021-06-22 | 携程旅游网络技术(上海)有限公司 | Information search method, system, device and medium |
Citations (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060026147A1 (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2006-02-02 | Cone Julian M | Adaptive search engine |
US20060036582A1 (en) * | 2004-08-16 | 2006-02-16 | Laust Sondergaard | Global search with local search |
US20080222122A1 (en) * | 2007-03-06 | 2008-09-11 | Fujitsu Limited | Information search apparatus, information search method thereof, and recording medium |
US20080222295A1 (en) * | 2006-11-02 | 2008-09-11 | Addnclick, Inc. | Using internet content as a means to establish live social networks by linking internet users to each other who are simultaneously engaged in the same and/or similar content |
US20100145937A1 (en) * | 2008-12-10 | 2010-06-10 | Gartner, Inc. | Interactive peer directory |
US20100205541A1 (en) * | 2009-02-11 | 2010-08-12 | Jeffrey A. Rapaport | social network driven indexing system for instantly clustering people with concurrent focus on same topic into on-topic chat rooms and/or for generating on-topic search results tailored to user preferences regarding topic |
US20100250578A1 (en) * | 2009-03-31 | 2010-09-30 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for conducting a profile based search |
US20110191311A1 (en) | 2010-02-03 | 2011-08-04 | Gartner, Inc. | Bi-model recommendation engine for recommending items and peers |
US20120078870A1 (en) * | 2010-09-28 | 2012-03-29 | Bazaz Gaurav | Apparatus and method for collaborative social search |
US20120110323A1 (en) * | 2010-10-27 | 2012-05-03 | Apple Inc. | Methods for processing private metadata |
US20130073473A1 (en) * | 2011-09-15 | 2013-03-21 | Stephan HEATH | System and method for social networking interactions using online consumer browsing behavior, buying patterns, advertisements and affiliate advertising, for promotions, online coupons, mobile services, products, goods & services, entertainment and auctions, with geospatial mapping technology |
US20130219176A1 (en) * | 2012-01-06 | 2013-08-22 | Venkata Sastry Akella | Secure Virtual File Management System |
US20130325839A1 (en) * | 2012-03-05 | 2013-12-05 | TeleCommunication Communication Systems, Inc. | Single Search Box Global |
US8661034B2 (en) | 2010-02-03 | 2014-02-25 | Gartner, Inc. | Bimodal recommendation engine for recommending items and peers |
US20140067702A1 (en) * | 2011-03-29 | 2014-03-06 | Yogesh Chunilal Rathod | Method and System for Dynamically Publishing, Sharing, Communication and Subscribing |
US20140067535A1 (en) * | 2012-08-31 | 2014-03-06 | Netseer, Inc. | Concept-level User Intent Profile Extraction and Applications |
US20140108395A1 (en) | 2010-02-03 | 2014-04-17 | Gartner, Inc. | Methods and systems for modifying a user profile for a recommendation algorithm and making recommendations based on user interactions with items |
US20140257890A1 (en) | 2013-03-05 | 2014-09-11 | Gartner, Inc. | Methods and systems for improving engagement with a recommendation engine that recommends items, peers, and services |
US20140358909A1 (en) * | 2013-05-29 | 2014-12-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Search result contexts for application launch |
US8918391B2 (en) | 2009-12-02 | 2014-12-23 | Gartner, Inc. | Interactive peer directory with question router |
US20150058380A1 (en) | 2009-12-02 | 2015-02-26 | Gartner, Inc. | Implicit profile for use with recommendation engine and/or question router |
US20150213096A1 (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2015-07-30 | Lexmark International Technology Sa | Systems and Methods for Searching Content from Multiple Sources |
US20150331948A1 (en) * | 2014-05-19 | 2015-11-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Search infrastructure and method for performing web search |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7626635B2 (en) * | 2003-04-04 | 2009-12-01 | Koplar Interactive Systems International, L.L.C. | Method and system of detecting signal presence from a video signal presented on a digital display device |
US20060003658A1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2006-01-05 | Hall Gregory K | Elastic clothlike meltblown materials, articles containing same, and methods of making same |
US20080022212A1 (en) * | 2006-07-24 | 2008-01-24 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | System And Method For Generating A Custom Default User Interface On A Document Processing Device |
JP5087442B2 (en) * | 2008-03-21 | 2012-12-05 | 富士フイルム株式会社 | Optical compensation film manufacturing method and manufacturing apparatus, optical compensation film, polarizing plate, liquid crystal display device |
-
2016
- 2016-01-11 US US14/992,232 patent/US10248725B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060026147A1 (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2006-02-02 | Cone Julian M | Adaptive search engine |
US20060036582A1 (en) * | 2004-08-16 | 2006-02-16 | Laust Sondergaard | Global search with local search |
US20080222295A1 (en) * | 2006-11-02 | 2008-09-11 | Addnclick, Inc. | Using internet content as a means to establish live social networks by linking internet users to each other who are simultaneously engaged in the same and/or similar content |
US20080222122A1 (en) * | 2007-03-06 | 2008-09-11 | Fujitsu Limited | Information search apparatus, information search method thereof, and recording medium |
US20100145937A1 (en) * | 2008-12-10 | 2010-06-10 | Gartner, Inc. | Interactive peer directory |
US8244674B2 (en) | 2008-12-10 | 2012-08-14 | Gartner, Inc. | Interactive peer directory |
US20100205541A1 (en) * | 2009-02-11 | 2010-08-12 | Jeffrey A. Rapaport | social network driven indexing system for instantly clustering people with concurrent focus on same topic into on-topic chat rooms and/or for generating on-topic search results tailored to user preferences regarding topic |
US20100250578A1 (en) * | 2009-03-31 | 2010-09-30 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for conducting a profile based search |
US20150058380A1 (en) | 2009-12-02 | 2015-02-26 | Gartner, Inc. | Implicit profile for use with recommendation engine and/or question router |
US8918391B2 (en) | 2009-12-02 | 2014-12-23 | Gartner, Inc. | Interactive peer directory with question router |
US20110191311A1 (en) | 2010-02-03 | 2011-08-04 | Gartner, Inc. | Bi-model recommendation engine for recommending items and peers |
US20140108395A1 (en) | 2010-02-03 | 2014-04-17 | Gartner, Inc. | Methods and systems for modifying a user profile for a recommendation algorithm and making recommendations based on user interactions with items |
US8661034B2 (en) | 2010-02-03 | 2014-02-25 | Gartner, Inc. | Bimodal recommendation engine for recommending items and peers |
US20120078870A1 (en) * | 2010-09-28 | 2012-03-29 | Bazaz Gaurav | Apparatus and method for collaborative social search |
US20120110323A1 (en) * | 2010-10-27 | 2012-05-03 | Apple Inc. | Methods for processing private metadata |
US20140067702A1 (en) * | 2011-03-29 | 2014-03-06 | Yogesh Chunilal Rathod | Method and System for Dynamically Publishing, Sharing, Communication and Subscribing |
US20130073473A1 (en) * | 2011-09-15 | 2013-03-21 | Stephan HEATH | System and method for social networking interactions using online consumer browsing behavior, buying patterns, advertisements and affiliate advertising, for promotions, online coupons, mobile services, products, goods & services, entertainment and auctions, with geospatial mapping technology |
US20130219176A1 (en) * | 2012-01-06 | 2013-08-22 | Venkata Sastry Akella | Secure Virtual File Management System |
US20130325839A1 (en) * | 2012-03-05 | 2013-12-05 | TeleCommunication Communication Systems, Inc. | Single Search Box Global |
US20140067535A1 (en) * | 2012-08-31 | 2014-03-06 | Netseer, Inc. | Concept-level User Intent Profile Extraction and Applications |
US20140257890A1 (en) | 2013-03-05 | 2014-09-11 | Gartner, Inc. | Methods and systems for improving engagement with a recommendation engine that recommends items, peers, and services |
US20140358909A1 (en) * | 2013-05-29 | 2014-12-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Search result contexts for application launch |
US20150213096A1 (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2015-07-30 | Lexmark International Technology Sa | Systems and Methods for Searching Content from Multiple Sources |
US20150331948A1 (en) * | 2014-05-19 | 2015-11-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Search infrastructure and method for performing web search |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
Senexx, Inc., SolvePath: Investor Overview, Apr. 2014, 11 pages. |
Senexx, Inc., SolvePath: User Guide, Apr. 2014, 10 pages. |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20160357756A1 (en) | 2016-12-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10248725B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for integrating search results of a local search engine with search results of a global generic search engine | |
US10817518B2 (en) | Implicit profile for use with recommendation engine and/or question router | |
US9135568B2 (en) | Identifying and ranking networked biographies and referral paths corresponding to selected qualifications | |
US8661050B2 (en) | Hybrid recommendation system | |
US8601023B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for identifying, extracting, capturing, and leveraging expertise and knowledge | |
US11455313B2 (en) | Systems and methods for intelligent prospect identification using online resources and neural network processing to classify organizations based on published materials | |
US20150006492A1 (en) | System and method for generating expert curated results | |
US20150310059A1 (en) | System and method for determining similarities between online entities | |
US20110225139A1 (en) | User role based customizable semantic search | |
US20100057772A1 (en) | Automatic determination of an entity's searchable social network using role-based inferences | |
US11281737B2 (en) | Unbiasing search results | |
US20110307432A1 (en) | Relevance for name segment searches | |
US11416907B2 (en) | Unbiased search and user feedback analytics | |
US11768905B2 (en) | System and computer program product for creating and processing URLs | |
WO2015113306A1 (en) | Entity page generation and entity related searching | |
US11308177B2 (en) | System and method for accessing and managing cognitive knowledge | |
US11442972B2 (en) | Methods and systems for modifying a search result | |
US11017042B2 (en) | Profile spam removal in search results from social network | |
US11762856B2 (en) | Query response module and content links user interface | |
US11449875B1 (en) | Organizational and personal identity verification and validation | |
Venugopal et al. | Web Recommendations Systems | |
Tibau et al. | A Systematic Mapping Study on Search Engine Industry’s Patent Innovations Focused on Matching the Search Results to User Intent | |
Sethi et al. | Query Recommendation Based on User Browsing History | |
Zhao et al. | DSN: A Knowledge-Based Scholar Networking Practice Towards Research Community | |
Brusilovsky et al. | HT'14 Workshop/SP 2014: First International Workshop on Social Personalization |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GARTNER, INC., CONNECTICUT Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GELFAND, MICHAEL;MICHEL, ZEEVI;POLONSKY, NIR;SIGNING DATES FROM 20160106 TO 20160107;REEL/FRAME:037451/0463 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GARTNER, INC.;REEL/FRAME:039041/0250 Effective date: 20160617 Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GARTNER, INC.;REEL/FRAME:039041/0250 Effective date: 20160617 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GARTNER, INC., CONNECTICUT Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:067002/0447 Effective date: 20240326 |