TWI853690B - Dynamic adjustment running transaction system and method thereof - Google Patents

Abstract

This disclosure provides a method of dynamically adjustment running transaction, and the method includes the following steps. A first monitoring load rate is preset. A first transaction load rate of a first running transaction in the first core account transaction device and a second transaction load rate in of a second running transaction in a second core account transaction device are computed and monitored. One of the first transaction load rate and the second transaction load rate is determined whether is greater than the first monitoring load rate. When one of the first transaction load rate and the second transaction load rate is greater than the first monitoring load rate, at least one of the first running transactions and the second running transactions is moved to the first core accounting transaction device or the second core accounting transaction device. In addition, this disclosure further provides a dynamic adjustment running transaction system.

Description

Dynamic adjustment operation trading system and method thereof

The present disclosure relates to a dynamically adjusted trading system and a method for using the same, and in particular to a dynamically adjusted trading system with high transaction process flexibility and a method for using the same.

The biggest challenge in banking transactions is system interruptions, which cause transactions to be suspended. Transactions conducted by users through websites or applications (Application, APP) may be slow or even impossible, causing many inconveniences to users.

In view of the above, establishing a stable system with high transaction process flexibility in the core account transaction system of the bank has become a problem to be solved in the relevant technical field.

Some embodiments of the present disclosure provide a dynamically adjusted operation transaction system, including a first core account transaction device, a second core account transaction device, and a processor. The first core account transaction device is signal-connected to the second core account transaction device, and the first core account transaction device is configured to perform a plurality of first operation transactions, while the second core account transaction device is configured to perform a plurality of second operation transactions. The processor is coupled to the first core account transaction device and the second core account transaction device, and is configured to execute a move instruction according to the transaction load signal of the first core account transaction device and the second core account transaction device, respectively, wherein the move instruction includes moving at least one of the first operation transactions to the second core account transaction device, or moving at least one of the second operation transactions to the first core account transaction device, and includes a transaction calculation module, a transaction monitoring module, and a transaction move module. The transaction calculation module is configured to calculate a first transaction load rate of the first operation transaction and a second transaction load rate of the second operation transaction according to the real-time transaction information of the first operation transaction and the second operation transaction, respectively. The transaction monitoring module is signal-connected to the transaction calculation module and configured to monitor whether at least one of the first transaction load rate and the second transaction load rate is greater than the first monitoring load rate, wherein when at least one of the first transaction load rate and the second transaction load rate is greater than the first monitoring load rate, the transaction monitoring module generates a load warning message. The transaction transfer module is signal-connected to the transaction monitoring module and configured to determine whether to execute a transfer instruction according to the load warning message.

Some embodiments of the present disclosure provide a method for dynamically adjusting operating transactions, including: setting a first monitoring load rate; calculating and monitoring a first transaction load rate of a first operating transaction in a first core account transaction device and a second transaction load rate of a second operating transaction in a second core account transaction device; determining whether one of the first transaction load rate and the second transaction load rate is greater than the first monitoring load rate; and when one of the first transaction load rate and the second transaction load rate is greater than the first monitoring load rate, moving at least one of the first operating transaction and the second operating transaction greater than the first monitoring load rate to the first core account transaction device or the second core account transaction device. In addition, the present disclosure further provides a system for dynamically adjusting operating transactions.

The following will clearly illustrate the spirit of the present disclosure with drawings and detailed descriptions. After understanding the embodiments of the present disclosure, any person having ordinary knowledge in the art can make changes and modifications based on the techniques taught by the present disclosure without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.

The terms used in this disclosure are only used to describe specific embodiments and are not intended to limit the disclosure. Singular forms such as "a", "this", "here", "this" and "the" as used in this disclosure also include plural forms.

As used herein, “coupling” or “signal connection” may refer to direct physical contact or indirect physical contact between two or more modules or devices, or mutual operation or action between two or more modules or devices.

The terms "include", "including", "have", etc. used in this document are open terms, meaning including but not limited to.

In the previous technology, resource efficiency calculations were first performed through the Work Loading Manager (WLM), and then the running transactions were assigned to one of the core accounting transaction devices for processing through system allocation. However, after the assignment was completed, the running transaction could no longer be moved to other core accounting transaction devices for processing. In order to effectively manage system resources, the system administrator must always pay attention to whether the central processing unit (CPU) utilization percentage (CPU%) is too busy, and suspending transactions must be judged based on past experience. However, with the changes in today's transaction patterns and the growth in transaction volume, transactions need to have a dynamic adjustment (i.e., moving or suspending) mechanism to prevent the CPU from being fully loaded and causing the system to stop.

Please refer to FIG. 1 for a block diagram of a dynamically adjusted transaction system 100 according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. The dynamically adjusted transaction system 100 includes a first core transaction device 110, a second core transaction device 112, a processor 120, and a memory 140. The first core transaction device 110 is signal-connected to the second core transaction device 112, and the first core transaction device 110 is configured to perform a plurality of first transaction operations, while the second core transaction device 112 is configured to perform a plurality of second transaction operations.

The memory 140 is coupled to the processor 120 and configured to store instructions, wherein the instructions include a pause instruction, a move instruction, and a resume instruction. In addition, the pause instruction includes causing at least one of the first running transactions or at least one of the second running transactions to pause the transaction. The move instruction includes moving at least one of the first running transactions to the second core account transaction device 112, or, moving at least one of the second running transactions to the first core account transaction device 110. The conditions for executing the pause instruction and executing the move instruction will be described in detail in the following content.

The processor 120 is coupled to the first core account transaction device 110 and the second core account transaction device 112, and is configured to access the suspension instruction or the move instruction from the memory 140 and execute the suspension instruction or the move instruction according to the transaction load signal of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second core account transaction device 112. Further, the processor 120 includes a transaction calculation module 122, a transaction monitoring module 124, a transaction move module 126 and a transaction suspension module 128.

The transaction calculation module 122 is configured to calculate a first transaction load rate of the first transaction and a second transaction load rate of the second transaction according to the real-time transaction information of the first transaction and the second transaction. Further, the real-time transaction information includes transaction category, transaction name, transaction step, transaction group/user, transaction operation rate or a combination thereof, wherein the transaction category includes, for example, a reconciliation category, a personal transaction category or a transaction abnormality category; the transaction name includes, for example, a Taiwan dollar deposit transaction, a check deposit transaction, a foreign currency deposit transaction, an offshore financial center (Offshore Banking Unit, OBU) foreign exchange demand deposit transaction, a gold passbook transaction, a time deposit transaction, a loan transaction, a full range of transactions or a combination thereof; the transaction operation rate includes, for example, a low speed, a medium speed and a high speed. The transaction calculation module 122 calculates the first transaction load rate and the second transaction load rate through the first operation transaction and the second operation transaction, respectively, wherein the first transaction load rate and the second transaction load rate are, for example, central processing unit utilization percentage (CPU %) (for example, individual CPU %, overall CPU % or a combination thereof). In addition, the central processing unit utilization percentage (CPU %) is obtained, for example, based on real-time transaction information. For example, Table 1 is one example of a method for obtaining the central processing unit utilization percentage (CPU %). In addition, the transaction calculation module 122 can also calculate the overall CPU %, for example, by averaging or weighted averaging all individual CPU % in the core account transaction device, etc. This is only an example, and the present disclosure is not limited thereto. In addition, for the sake of convenience, the embodiments of the present disclosure collectively refer to personal ID, transaction name, transaction steps, transaction running rate, CPU % or a combination thereof as a "transaction execution combination", but the transaction execution combination may still include other transaction-related indicators, data or parameters.

As shown in Table 1, the CPU usage percentage (CPU %) (individual CPU %) is obtained by comparing the personal identification (ID), transaction name, transaction step, transaction running rate or a combination thereof, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto.

Table 1 Personal ID Transaction Name Transaction steps Transaction running rate CPU % MU2014 TWD Deposit Transaction Enter deposit amount Low 93 % WY5040 OBU foreign exchange demand deposit transactions Calculate interest middle 81 % ED3020 Gold Passbook Transaction Gold Price Inquiry Low 92 % FH6012 Gold Passbook Transaction Buy Gold high 70 % PO5029 Foreign Currency Deposit Transactions Check foreign currency amount Low 98 % RW3026 Fixed deposit transactions Query interest Low 92 % LK9012 Foreign Currency Deposit Transactions Purchase foreign currency high 85 %

The transaction monitoring module 124 is signal-connected to the transaction calculation module 122, and the transaction monitoring module 124 is configured to monitor whether the first transaction load rate and the second transaction load rate are greater than the first monitoring load rate, wherein the first monitoring load rate is, for example, 90%. In addition, when the first transaction load rate is greater than the first monitoring load rate or the second transaction load rate is greater than the first monitoring load rate, the transaction monitoring module 124 generates a load warning message, and the load warning message includes the first transaction load rate, the second transaction load rate, the transaction name, the transaction step or a combination thereof.

The transaction transfer module 126 is signal-connected to the transaction monitoring module 124, and the transaction transfer module 126 is configured to determine whether to access a transfer instruction from the memory 140 and execute the transfer instruction according to the load warning message.

For example, when the first transaction load rate is greater than the first monitoring load rate, the transaction monitoring module 124 generates a load warning message and moves at least one of the first running transactions in the first core account transaction device 110 to the second core account transaction device 112 for transaction through the transaction migration module 126.

The transaction suspension module 128 is signal-connected to the transaction monitoring module 124 and the transaction transfer module 126, and the transaction suspension module 128 is configured to determine whether to access the suspension instruction from the memory 140 and execute the suspension instruction according to the load warning message and the real-time transaction information. In addition, it is worth mentioning that the real-time transaction information includes suspendable transaction steps and non-suspendable transaction steps, wherein the non-suspendable transaction steps include important steps involving personal assets and personal data, such as verifying the user's personal data and the steps of money in and out.

For example, when a user conducts a "NT dollar deposit transaction", and the NT dollar deposit transaction is conducted in the first core account transaction device 110, the transaction steps include entering a personal account and password, logging in, clicking on a transaction category, entering a NT dollar deposit passbook account and password, verification, depositing NT dollars, confirming the deposited NT dollar amount, and completing the deposit of NT dollars. Among them, since verification involves personal data security, and depositing NT dollars and completing the deposit of NT dollars involve the entry and exit of money, they are relatively important transaction steps. Therefore, the transaction steps of verification, depositing NT dollars, and completing the deposit of NT dollars are non-pausable transaction steps. Accordingly, when a transaction step that cannot be suspended is encountered, the dynamic adjustment operation transaction system 100 can only move the NT dollar deposit transaction, but cannot suspend it. When the transaction step is a suspendable transaction step, such as the transaction steps of inputting a personal account and password, logging in, clicking on a transaction category, inputting a NT dollar deposit passbook account and password, and confirming the deposited NT dollar amount, the transaction suspension module 128 can issue a suspension instruction according to the first load rate or the second load rate to suspend the NT dollar deposit transaction.

In addition, it is worth mentioning that after executing the move command, all subsequent steps of the transaction will be moved to another core account transaction device for execution. In the above example, when the NTD deposit transaction reaches the verification transaction step, the transaction move module 126 will move all steps after verification (i.e., verifying the deposited NTD, confirming the deposited NTD amount, and completing the deposited NTD) to the second core account transaction device 112 for execution.

The details of executing the move command are further described. It is worth mentioning that the first transaction step in each transaction execution combination includes a set of identification codes, and the transaction transfer module 126 identifies the identification code to identify multiple transaction steps as the same combination of transaction execution combinations.

Executing the said move instruction includes the following operation instructions: executing pre-move instruction, executing move transaction step instruction, executing detection identification code instruction and executing post-move transaction instruction. In addition, the pre-move instruction is, for example, a suspend transaction step. When the suspend transaction step is to be executed, it is necessary to first determine whether the transaction step is a non-suspendable transaction step. Executing the move transaction step instruction means moving at least one step or all steps of the transaction execution combination from a core account transaction device with a higher transaction load rate to a core account transaction device with a lower transaction load rate. Detecting the identification code includes deleting the transaction steps that have been executed on the original core account transaction device (i.e., the core account transaction device with a higher transaction load rate) after identifying the identification code, and retaining the transaction steps that have not been executed, wherein the identification code is a code of 3 to 6 English letters, numbers or a combination thereof. Executing the post-migration transaction instruction includes executing the transaction steps that have not been executed.

Please refer to Table 2 below. Table 2 is an example of a transaction execution combination with 10 transaction steps to illustrate the individual operation instructions when executing a move instruction. As shown in Table 2, the transaction execution combination of this example has 10 transaction steps, wherein the execution sequence of the first transaction step includes an identification code, such as SXU.

Next, when the transaction monitoring module 124 detects that the transaction load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 is greater than the first monitoring load rate, it will request the transaction transfer module 126 to execute the transfer instruction. Accordingly, the transaction transfer module 126 will first execute the pre-transfer instruction, such as pausing the unexecuted transaction steps in the transaction execution combination. Then, the transfer transaction step instruction is executed to transfer at least one step or all steps of the transaction execution combination to the second core account transaction device 112.

Next, the transaction transfer module 126 detects the identification code of the transaction execution combination, such as SXU. When the transaction transfer module 126 recognizes the identification code, it will re-combine all the steps of the transaction execution combination in order. Then, the transaction transfer module 126 will determine which steps have been executed. In this example, the first to third transaction steps have been executed. Therefore, the transaction transfer module 126 will delete the first to third transaction steps, but retain the identification code contained in the first transaction step, and retain the fourth to tenth transaction steps.

Then, the transaction transfer module 126 executes the post-transfer transaction instruction, so that the fourth transaction step to the tenth transaction step of the transaction execution combination are performed in the second core accounting transaction device 112.

Table 2 Trading Steps Execution Instructions The transaction load rate is detected to be greater than the first monitoring load rate Execute pre-move instructions Execute the move transaction step command Detection ID Post-transfer transaction instructions Identification code + 1st transaction step V X V ID+D Identification code Transaction Step 2 V V D - Transaction Step 3 V V D Transaction Step 4 X V V R V Transaction Step 5 X V V R V Transaction Step 6 X V V R V Transaction Step 7 X V V R V Transaction Step 8 X V V R V Transaction Step 9 X V V R V Trading Step 10 X V V R V Note: V: execute the command; X: do not execute the command; D: delete the transaction step; R: keep the transaction step.

In another embodiment of the present disclosure, the dynamic adjustment operation transaction system 100 is pre-set with a second monitoring load rate, for example, 60%. When the first transaction load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 is less than the second monitoring load rate and the second transaction load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 is greater than the first monitoring load rate, the transaction migration module 126 executes a migration instruction to migrate at least one of the second core account transaction devices 112 to the first core account transaction device 110. Alternatively, when the second transaction load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 is less than the second monitoring load rate, and the first transaction load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 is greater than the first monitoring load rate, the transaction migration module 126 executes a migration instruction to migrate at least one of the first core account transaction devices 110 to the second core account transaction device 112.

According to some embodiments, the processor 120 of the dynamically adjusted running transaction system 100 further includes a transaction recovery module 130. The transaction recovery module 130 is signal-connected to the transaction monitoring module 124 and the transaction suspension module 128. When the first transaction load rate or the second transaction load rate is less than the first monitoring load rate, the transaction monitoring module 124 generates a transaction recovery message, and when the transaction recovery module 130 receives the transaction recovery message, it stores the recovery instruction from the memory 140 and executes the recovery instruction to resume the transaction of at least one of the first running transactions or at least one of the second running transactions.

It is worth mentioning that the embodiment of the present disclosure takes the first core account transaction device 110 and the second core account transaction device 112 as examples, but the number of core account transaction devices is not limited to this. There can be multiple (more than 3) core account transaction devices to increase the flexibility of dynamically adjusting the operation of the transaction system 100 to avoid suspension of operation of transactions due to excessive load rate.

According to some embodiments, the dynamic adjustment operation transaction system 100 further includes an input/output device 150 and a printing device 160. The input/output device 150 is coupled to the processor 120, and the input/output device 150 is configured to control and manage the processor 120. The printing device 160 is coupled to the processor 120, and the printing device 160 is configured to perform a printing operation according to a printing instruction, wherein the printing instruction is stored in the memory 140, and when the system administrator inputs a print request through the input/output device 150, the processor 120 accesses the print instruction from the memory 140, and the printing device 160 executes the print request.

According to some embodiments, the processor 120 of the dynamic adjustment operation trading system 100 further includes a transaction change notification module 132. The transaction change notification module 132 is signal-connected to the transaction suspension module 128 and the transaction transfer module 126, and the transaction change notification module 132 is configured to generate a suspended transaction report according to whether the transaction suspension module 128 executes the suspension instruction, and to generate a transfer transaction report according to whether the transfer module 126 executes the transfer instruction. In addition, the transaction change notification module 132 transmits the suspended transaction report and/or the transfer transaction report to the input/output device 150 to provide it to the system administrator for confirmation. Furthermore, the system administrator can input a print request through the input/output device 150 to request the printing device 160 to print the suspended transaction report and/or the moved transaction report.

Further, please refer to FIG. 2, which is a flow chart of the dynamic adjustment operation trading method of the first embodiment of the present disclosure. In this embodiment, the dynamic adjustment operation trading process 200 can be executed by the dynamic adjustment operation trading system 100 shown in the embodiment of FIG. 1, so it can be read together with FIG. 1. The processor 120 can access and execute instructions (such as pause instructions and move instructions) from the memory 140 to implement the application specified by the instruction, which corresponds to the dynamically adjusted transaction process 200, to calculate and monitor the transaction load rate of the core account transaction device (such as the first core account transaction device 110 and the second core account transaction device 112) in real time, to pause or move the transaction, to dynamically adjust the transaction, and to increase the flexibility of the dynamically adjusted transaction process. In this embodiment, one of the first transaction load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second transaction load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 is greater than the first monitoring load rate, and the other is less than the first monitoring load rate. The detailed steps of the dynamic adjustment operation transaction process 200 will be described in the following paragraphs.

First, in step S201, the first monitoring load rate and the second monitoring load rate of the core account transaction device (for example, the first core account transaction device 110 and the second core account transaction device 112) are set. In some embodiments, the system administrator can input the first monitoring load rate and the second monitoring load rate through the input/output device 150. In some embodiments, the first monitoring value is 90%, and the second monitoring value is 60%.

In step S203, the first load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 are calculated and monitored according to the real-time transaction information.

In step S205, based on the real-time transaction information of multiple operations in the first core account transaction device 110 and the second core account transaction device 112, it is determined whether the transaction load rate of one of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second core account transaction device 112 is greater than the first monitoring load rate, that is, whether one of the first transaction load rate and the second transaction load rate is greater than 90%.

When the transaction load rate of any core account transaction device is greater than the first monitoring value, the process returns to step S203 to continue calculating and monitoring the transaction load rate of the core account transaction device. In addition, in the example where the first load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 are both greater than the first monitoring load rate, the dynamic adjustment operation transaction process 300 as shown in FIG. 3 is performed, which will be described in detail in the following paragraphs. In addition, in the example where the first load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 is greater than the first monitoring load rate, and the second load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 is less than the second monitoring load rate, the transaction process 400 is dynamically adjusted as shown in FIG. 4 , which will be described in detail in the following paragraphs.

When the first transaction load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 or the second transaction load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 is higher than the first monitoring load rate, step S207 is executed to further determine whether the running transaction is a non-pause transaction step. If not, step S209 is entered to suspend at least one of the running transactions of the core account transaction device with a higher than the first monitoring load rate. And, after suspending the running transaction, step S211 and step S213 are entered to notify the system administrator to alert the system administrator, and request the alert system administrator to confirm the suspended running transaction, and generate a suspended transaction report to record the suspension of the running transaction. Further, the process proceeds to step S215 to print a report.

Continuing from step S207, if the running transaction is a non-pausable transaction step, the process proceeds to step S217 to move at least one of the running transactions from the core account transaction device with a higher load rate than the first monitoring load rate. Furthermore, the process proceeds to step S219 to generate a moving transaction report to record the moving of the running transaction. Furthermore, the process proceeds to step S215 to print the report.

Please refer to Figure 3, which is a flow chart of the dynamic adjustment operation transaction method of the second embodiment of the present disclosure. Figure 3 is a dynamic adjustment operation transaction process 300 when the first load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 are both greater than the first monitoring load rate.

Similarly, in step S301, the first load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 are calculated and monitored. Then, in step S303, it is determined whether the first load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 are greater than the first monitoring load rate.

In step S305, it is determined that the first load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 are both greater than the first monitoring load rate. Then, the process proceeds to step S307 to determine whether there are any suspendable transaction steps in the running transactions in the first core account transaction device 110 and the running transactions in the second core account transaction device 112. If not, the process proceeds to step S309 to issue a warning notification to the system administrator, alert the system administrator, and request the system administrator to cancel the warning notification.

If yes, then the process proceeds to step S311 to suspend the running transaction that is a suspendable transaction step. Then, the process proceeds to step S313 to re-determine whether the first transaction load rate or the second transaction load rate is less than the first monitoring load rate. If no, then the process returns to step S307 to re-determine whether the running transaction in the first core account transaction device 110 and the running transaction in the second core account transaction device 112 have a suspendable transaction step.

If yes, then the process proceeds to step S315, and the running transaction is moved to the core account transaction device with a smaller load rate or less than the first monitoring load rate. For example, after pausing the running transaction of the pausable transaction step, the first load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 is less than the second load rate of the second core account transaction device 112, then at least one of the running transactions in the first core account transaction device 110 is moved to the second core account transaction device 112 for transaction, which is only an example, and the present disclosure is not limited to this. It is understandable that, although the steps of generating a migration transaction report and suspending transaction report recording and printing a report are not shown in the dynamic adjustment operation transaction process 300, the dynamic adjustment operation transaction process 300 can still execute these steps.

Please refer to Figure 4, which is a flowchart of the dynamic adjustment operation transaction method of the third embodiment of the present disclosure. Figure 4 is a dynamic adjustment operation transaction process 400 for the first core account transaction device 110 having a first load rate greater than a first monitoring load rate and a second load rate less than a second monitoring load rate.

Similarly, in step S401, the first load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 are calculated and monitored. In step S403, it is determined whether one of the first load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 is greater than the first monitoring load rate, and whether the other of the first load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 is less than the second monitoring load rate, wherein the first monitoring load rate is, for example, 90%, and the second monitoring load rate is, for example, 60%.

In step S405, it is determined that one of the first load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 is less than the second monitoring load rate, and the other of the first load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 is less than the second monitoring load rate. Then, step S407 is entered to execute the migration of the running transaction. For example, when the first load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 is greater than the first monitoring load rate, and the second load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 is less than the second monitoring load rate, at least one of the running transactions of the first core account transaction device 110 is migrated to the second core account transaction device 112. It is understandable that, although the steps of generating a transport transaction report to record the operation transaction and printing the report are not shown in the dynamic adjustment operation transaction process 400, the dynamic adjustment operation transaction process 400 can still execute these steps.

Please refer to FIG. 5, which is a flowchart of the method for dynamically adjusting the transaction operation of the fourth embodiment of the present disclosure. FIG. 5 is a dynamically adjusting transaction operation process 500 for suspending the transaction operation when the transaction load rate of the core account transaction device is less than the first monitoring load rate. In addition, the step S501 of the dynamically adjusting transaction operation process 500 suspends the transaction operation, for example, step S209 in the dynamically adjusting transaction operation process 200, step S311 in the dynamically adjusting transaction operation process 300, or other possible suspended transactions.

Following the suspension of the transaction in step S501, in step S503, the first transaction load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second transaction load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 are recalculated and monitored.

In step S505, it is determined whether the first transaction load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 and the second transaction load rate of the second core account transaction device 112 are less than the first monitoring load rate. If not, the process returns to step S501 to continue suspending the running transaction, and then proceeds to step S507 to execute the migration of the running transaction.

If yes, then the process proceeds to step S509 to resume the running transaction. For example, if the process continues to dynamically adjust the running transaction process 200 in step S209, assuming that the first transaction load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 is greater than the first monitoring load rate, then when the first transaction load rate of the first core account transaction device 110 is less than the first monitoring load rate, the running transaction that is suspended in the first core account transaction device 110 is resumed.

Please refer to Figure 6, which is a flow chart of the dynamic adjustment operation transaction method of the fifth embodiment of the present disclosure. Figure 6 is a dynamic adjustment operation transaction process 600 for moving operation transactions. It is worth mentioning that step S601 and step S603 of the dynamic adjustment operation transaction process 600 are, for example, step S217 of the dynamic adjustment operation transaction process 200, step S311 of the dynamic adjustment operation transaction process 300, step S407 of the dynamic adjustment operation transaction process 400, step S507 of the dynamic adjustment operation transaction process 500, a process in which the move command is directly executed without determining whether to execute the pause command, or a move step of other processes.

In step S601, the running transactions that can be moved are calculated, and the load required for the moved running transactions is calculated; and in step S603, the running transactions that can be received are calculated, and the transaction load rate of the received running transactions is calculated. In some embodiments, the processor 120 in the dynamic adjustment running transaction system 100 can determine the running transactions that need to be moved and the load rate required for the moved running transactions based on the real-time transaction information and the set first monitoring load rate.

Next, in step S605, it is determined whether the transaction load rate of the core accounting transaction device (e.g., the first core accounting transaction device 110 or the second core accounting transaction device 112) is still greater than the first monitoring load rate after receiving and moving the operation transaction. If it is still greater than the first monitoring load rate, then step S607 is entered to issue a warning notification to the system administrator, and the system administrator is alerted to request the system administrator to cancel the warning notification. And, it returns to step S601 and step S603. If so, then step S609 is entered to generate a migration transaction report to record the migration of the operation transaction.

Further, please refer to Figure 7, which is a flow chart of the dynamic adjustment operation transaction method for executing a move instruction in some embodiments of the present disclosure. Figure 7 is a dynamic adjustment operation transaction process 700 for executing a move instruction.

In step S701, it is detected whether the transaction load rate is greater than the first monitoring load rate. When it is detected that the transaction load rate is not greater than the first monitoring load rate, that is, the transaction load rate is less than the first monitoring load rate, the process proceeds to step S703, and the transaction step continues. When it is detected that the transaction load rate is greater than the first monitoring load rate, the process proceeds to step S705, and the pre-migration instruction is executed, such as pausing the transaction step.

Then, step S707 is entered to execute the transaction step transfer instruction, that is, to transfer at least one step or all steps of the transaction execution combination to be transferred to another core account transaction device. In other words, the transaction execution combination to be transferred is transferred from the core account transaction device with a higher transaction load rate to the core account transaction device with a lower transaction load rate.

Then, the process proceeds to step S709 to detect the identification code of the transaction execution combination (for example, the first transaction step in the transaction steps of the transaction execution combination includes the identification code) to identify that the multiple transaction steps are the same transaction execution combination.

Then, the process proceeds to step S711 to delete the transaction steps that have been executed in the original core account transaction device (i.e., the higher transaction load rate) and retain the transaction steps that have not been executed in the original core account transaction device.

Finally, in step S713, in another core account transaction device (i.e., the one with a lower transaction load rate or a higher transaction load rate), the post-transfer transaction instruction is executed, i.e., the reserved transaction steps are executed. In addition, it is worth mentioning that the instructions from step S705 to step S713 are transfer instructions.

In summary, the core account transaction device system and method provided in this case can automatically and instantly allocate the suspension or relocation of running transactions according to the first monitoring value defined by the system administrator for monitoring the maximum load rate that the core account transaction device can bear, and the real-time transaction information of the core account transaction device. It is not necessary to monitor and relocate the load rate in a traditional system allocation manner, but it can efficiently and flexibly determine which core account transaction device the running transaction should be conducted on. Therefore, the problem of suspension of running transactions due to excessive load rate can be prevented in real time.

Although the present invention is disclosed as above by way of embodiments, it is not intended to limit the present invention. Anyone skilled in the art can make various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Therefore, the scope of protection of the present invention shall be subject to the scope of the patent application attached hereto.

100: Dynamically adjust the operation of the trading system

110: First core account transaction device

112: Second core account transaction device

120:Processor

122: Transaction calculation module

124: Transaction Monitoring Module

126: Transaction Migration Module

128: Transaction Pause Module

130:Transaction recovery module

132: Transaction change notification module

140:Memory

150: Input/output device

160: Printing device

200,300,400,500,600,700: Dynamically adjust the transaction process

S201, S203, S205, S207, S209, S211, S213, S215, S217, S219: Steps

S301, S303, S305, S307, S309, S311, S313, S315: Steps

S401, S403, S405, S407: Steps

S501, S503, S505, S507, S509: Steps

S601, S603, S605, S607, S609: Steps

S701, S703, S705, S707, S709, S711, S713: Steps

To make the disclosure and other purposes, features, advantages and embodiments more clearly understandable, the attached figures are described as follows: Figure 1 is a block diagram of a dynamically adjusted trading system according to some embodiments of the disclosure; Figure 2 is a flow chart of a dynamically adjusted trading method according to the first embodiment of the disclosure; Figure 3 is a flow chart of a dynamically adjusted trading method according to the second embodiment of the disclosure; Figure 4 is a flow chart of a dynamically adjusted trading method according to the third embodiment of the disclosure; Figure 5 is a flow chart of a dynamically adjusted trading method according to the fourth embodiment of the disclosure; Figure 6 is a flow chart of a dynamically adjusted trading method according to the fifth embodiment of the disclosure; and Figure 7 is a flow chart of executing a move instruction in the dynamically adjusted trading method according to some embodiments of the disclosure.

Domestic storage information (please note in the order of storage institution, date, and number) None Foreign storage information (please note in the order of storage country, institution, date, and number) None

200: Dynamically adjust the transaction process

S201, S203, S205, S207, S209, S211, S213, S215, S217, S219: Steps

Claims (7)

A dynamic adjustment operation transaction system includes: a first core account transaction device, configured to perform a plurality of first operation transactions; a second core account transaction device, signal-connected to the first core account transaction device and configured to perform a plurality of second operation transactions; and a processor, coupled to the first core account transaction device and the second core account transaction device, configured to execute a move instruction according to a transaction load signal of the first core account transaction device and the second core account transaction device, respectively, wherein the move instruction includes moving at least one of the first operation transactions to the second core account transaction device, or moving the second operation transactions to the second core account transaction device. The invention relates to a first core account transaction device, wherein at least one of the first transaction load rate and the second transaction load rate is moved to the first core account transaction device, and comprises: a transaction calculation module, configured to calculate a first transaction load rate of the first transaction and a second transaction load rate of the second transaction according to real-time transaction information of the first transaction and the second transaction; a transaction monitoring module, signal-connected to the transaction calculation module, configured to monitor whether at least one of the first transaction load rate and the second transaction load rate is greater than a first monitoring load rate, wherein when at least one of the first transaction load rate and the second transaction load rate is greater than the first monitoring load rate, the transaction monitoring module generates a load warning. message; a transaction transfer module, signal-connected to the transaction monitoring module, configured to determine whether to execute the transfer instruction according to the load warning message; and a transaction suspension module, signal-connected to the transaction monitoring module and the transaction transfer module, configured to determine whether to execute a suspension instruction according to the load warning message and the real-time transaction information, wherein the real-time transaction information includes a plurality of transaction steps, and the transaction steps include a suspendable transaction step and an unsuspendable transaction step, wherein the transaction suspension module will execute the suspension instruction only when at least one of the first running transactions or at least one of the second running transactions belongs to the suspendable transaction step, The move command further includes: a pre-move command configured to suspend at least one of the transaction steps; a move transaction step command configured to move at least one of the transaction steps to one of the first core account transaction device and the second core account transaction device; a detection identification code command configured to detect an identification code of the transaction steps to determine whether the transaction steps belong to the same first running transactions or the second running transactions; and a post-move transaction command configured to make at least one of the transaction steps that have not yet been executed be performed in one of the first core account transaction device and the second core account transaction device. The dynamically adjusted transaction system as described in claim 1, wherein the processor further comprises: a transaction recovery module, signal-connected to the transaction monitoring module and the transaction suspension module, wherein when the first transaction load rate or the second transaction load rate is less than the first monitoring load rate, the transaction monitoring module generates a transaction recovery message, and the transaction recovery module receives the transaction recovery message to recover at least one of the first running transactions and at least one of the second running transactions. The dynamically adjusted operating transaction system as described in claim 1, wherein when the first transaction load rate of the first core account transaction device is less than a second monitoring load rate and the second transaction load rate of the second core account transaction device is greater than the first monitoring load rate, the transaction transfer module executes the transfer instruction to transfer at least one of the second core account transaction device to the first core account transaction device; or when the second transaction load rate of the second core account transaction device is less than the second monitoring load rate and the first transaction load rate of the first core account transaction device is greater than the first monitoring load rate, the transaction transfer module executes the transfer instruction to transfer at least one of the first operating transactions of the first core account transaction device to the second core account transaction device. The dynamically adjusted trading system as described in claim 1, wherein the processor further comprises: a trading change notification module, signal-connected to the trading suspension module, configured to generate a suspended trading report according to whether the trading suspension module executes the suspension instruction, or to generate a transfer trading report according to whether the trading transfer module executes the transfer instruction. A method for dynamically adjusting operating transactions includes: setting a first monitoring load rate; calculating and monitoring a first transaction load rate of a plurality of first operating transactions in a first core account transaction device and a second transaction load rate of a plurality of second operating transactions in a second core account transaction device; determining whether one of the first transaction load rate and the second transaction load rate is greater than the first monitoring load rate; and when one of the first transaction load rate and the second transaction load rate is greater than the first monitoring load rate, moving at least one of the first operating transactions and the second operating transactions greater than the first monitoring load rate to the first core account transaction device and the second core account transaction device. One of the first core account transaction devices includes: executing a pre-transfer command to suspend at least one of the multiple transaction steps of the first running transactions or the second running transactions; executing a transfer transaction step command to transfer at least one of the transaction steps to one of the first core account transaction device and the second core account transaction device; executing a detection identification code command to determine whether the transaction steps belong to the same first running transactions or the second running transactions; and executing a post-transfer transaction command to perform at least one of the transaction steps that have not yet been executed in one of the first core account transaction device and the second core account transaction device. The method for dynamically adjusting and operating transactions as described in claim 5, wherein the step of executing the detection identification code instruction includes: deleting at least one of the transaction steps that have been executed in one of the first core account transaction device and the second core account transaction device; and retaining at least one of the transaction steps that have not been executed in one of the first core account transaction device and the second core account transaction device. The method for dynamically adjusting running transactions as described in claim 5 further includes: when it is determined that one of the first transaction load rate of the first core account transaction device and the second transaction load rate of the second core account transaction device has recovered to less than the first monitoring load rate, at least one of the suspended first running transactions and the suspended second running transactions is resumed.

Images