TWI227185B - Manufacturing method of a fire retardant plywood - Google Patents
Manufacturing method of a fire retardant plywood Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- TWI227185B TWI227185B TW89117566A TW89117566A TWI227185B TW I227185 B TWI227185 B TW I227185B TW 89117566 A TW89117566 A TW 89117566A TW 89117566 A TW89117566 A TW 89117566A TW I227185 B TWI227185 B TW I227185B
- Authority
- TW
- Taiwan
- Prior art keywords
- plywood
- flame retardant
- flame
- test
- absorption
- Prior art date
Links
Landscapes
- Chemical And Physical Treatments For Wood And The Like (AREA)
Abstract
Description
1227185 曰 修正 案號 89Π7566 五、發明說明(1) I、前言 木材係由許多細胞集合而成之生物性材 才:時J有調節環境溫度與濕度等多項優良 U此,自古以來,木材即為人類所喜愛,彳特丨生。 具、建築及室内裝璜等用材。 擇為家 近年來,台灣地區經濟快速成長, 發展,人口過度集、,使得建築都會區迅逮 ,體化、構造特殊化及設備複雜型二,層 衣修,多使用如紙、塑膠、木材、人 ^ /、至内 其中以木材類佔大宗。木材係由碳:氫、:〗4可::材料, 所構成之材料,具可燃性,是其 ,二兀素為主體 :生火災,將可於短時間内造成二旦 2Ϊ部統計,近年來臺灣地區火災發生頻率°據 趨勢。其中由材料所引發者佔大多數, 年增加的 於國内公共安全問題層出不窮,政府 =口人重視。鑑 消防法令之研修,而於8 4年7 。卩門便積極著手 冋年8月1 1曰公布實施。自此, 八:嗔通過’ 之設計與施工,均需恪遵消防法之琢所有關建築 全,保障民眾之生命財產。 疋執仃以落實公共安 木吳板類中之合板(plywood)㊣右|上去 工業之發展。近年來因原木來源短缺1大貝獻於台灣木材 本節節上升等諸多因素,使得合板工=升值、勞工成 景,惟合板係室内裝修最重要建材之I,=不復過去之榮 當可觀。為因應此-項問題,加強原料門;;用2需要量相 卄開發,利用針葉樹1227185 Amendment No. 89Π7566 V. Description of the Invention (1) I. Introduction Wood is a biological material composed of many cells: there are many excellent materials that regulate the temperature and humidity of the environment. Since ancient times, wood has been Loved by human beings. Materials such as furniture, construction and interior decoration. Choosing Your Home In recent years, Taiwan's economy has grown rapidly, developed, and overpopulated, which has led to the rapid acquisition of architectural metropolitan areas, specialization, special structures, and complex equipment. Second, repairing clothes and using more paper, plastic, and wood. , People ^ /, to the inside of which wood accounts for the bulk. Wood is made of carbon: hydrogen :: 4 可 :: material, which is flammable, and its element is the main component: fire, which will cause the statistics of Erdan and Erbu in a short time, in recent years The frequency of fires coming to Taiwan is trending. Among them, most of them are caused by materials. The annual increase in domestic public safety issues is endless, and the government pays attention to them. Jian Fire Research and Training, and in 1984 7. Yemen actively started to implement the announcement on August 11 of the following year. Since then, the design and construction of the 8: 嗔 pass must be in strict accordance with the relevant buildings of the Fire Protection Law to protect the lives and property of the people. The implementation of plywood in the public safety wood board category right | up to the development of industry. In recent years, due to a shortage of log sources, 1 large shell dedicated to Taiwan ’s timber, and many other factors, making plywood workers = appreciation and labor prosperity, but plywood is the most important building material for interior decoration, = glory is no longer the past. In order to cope with this problem, strengthen the raw material door; develop with 2 required phases, use conifers
第6頁 1227185 __案號 89117566_年月日 修正 五、發明說明(2) 中小徑木作為中層材料已為必然之趨勢,而自動化機器設 備之適時更新亦十分重要。目前國内阻燃合板之生產量僅 佔合板總生產量之少部份,推究之,主因價格較昂以致消 費意願不高。其次,工廠製造阻燃合板之技術待提升以及 成本問題亦相當影響產銷之暢通。以製造技術言,膠合劑 種類、布膠量、製板條件、樹種及膠合劑與阻燃劑之相容 性,甚至成板厚度等因子均需一一加以考慮。發明人等曾 深入探討防燄合板之製造及其耐燃性改善效應,惟室内裝Page 6 1227185 __Case No. 89117566_ Year, month, day, and amendment 5. V. INTRODUCTION TO THE INVENTION (2) It is an inevitable trend that middle and small diameter woods are used as middle layer materials, and timely updating of automatic machine equipment is also very important. At present, the domestic production of flame-retardant plywood only accounts for a small part of the total production of plywood. It is speculated that the main reason is that the price is too high and the willingness to consume is not high. Secondly, the technology of manufacturing flame retardant plywood in the factory needs to be improved and the cost problem also affects the smooth flow of production and sales. In terms of manufacturing technology, factors such as the type of glue, the amount of cloth glue, the board making conditions, the compatibility of the tree species and the glue with the flame retardant, and even the thickness of the board need to be considered one by one. The inventors and others have thoroughly discussed the manufacture of flame-resistant plywood and the effect of improving its flame resistance.
修用阻燃合板則尚未見研究,三分厚合板多用於室内裝修 之牆壁平整(釘平)木地板施工、床板、隔間等用途,有 必要予以耐燃處理,故製造條件因之必需進一步探討,以 獲致最適條件及製品品質。為此,乃以最常用之柳桉材( 面底板)及放射松(中層材料)為試材,經中華民國國家標与 (CNS-4182 Type C)阻燃劑一種及自行組配之兩種水容" 性阻燃劑,以充細胞法真空加壓(FuU ceU ”⑶⑽^瓜 pregnation)加壓注入後,進行三分厚阻燃合板研 以CNS-6532、、建築物室内裝修材料耐燃性檢驗 3級為基準,進行表面燃燒試驗及相關性質之产、二: 各處理材之耐燃性改善效應,評估通過中疋丄抓时 標準之耐燃3級時,藥劑所需最少吸收量。國國家試驗 首就耐燃合板所使用之板材、阻燃 及硬化劑分析其特性及試驗如後: 膠合劑增量劑 (I )、試驗材料 1 ·單板: •1227185Repair flame-retardant plywood has not been studied yet. Three-thick thick plywood is mostly used for wall decoration (nail flat) wooden floor construction, bedboards, and compartments in interior decoration. It is necessary to be flame-resistant. Therefore, the manufacturing conditions must be further discussed. In order to obtain the optimal conditions and product quality. For this purpose, the most commonly used eucalyptus (front and bottom) and radiant pine (middle-layer materials) are used as test materials. They have been tested by the National Standard of the Republic of China and (CNS-4182 Type C) flame retardants and two types of water capacity. " The flame retardant is injected under the pressure of the cell-filled method (FuU ceU "CD⑽ ^ melon pregnation), and then the three-thickness of the flame retardant plywood is tested by CNS-6532. Level as the benchmark, conduct surface burning test and related properties, two: the flame resistance improvement effect of each treatment material, to evaluate the minimum absorption required of the agent when passing the flame resistance level 3 of the standard at the time of grasping. Analyze the characteristics and tests of the board, flame retardant and hardener used in the fire-resistant plywood as follows: glue extender (I), test material 1 · single board: • 1227185
1 號 89117566 五、發明說明(3) 紅柳桉(Red lauan ;Shorea sd )絲 比重0·48〜〇·50,含水率10〜12%,厚度〇·二反單=乾 裁切成面積30 x 30(cnf),供為製備合板之表底板。奴及 放射松(Pinus radiata)旋切單板,氣乾比重〇 〜0.50,含水率7〜1〇%,中板厚度2 55_,副中板厚^ 2.50mm ’單板亦裁切成面積3〇χ 3〇(cnf),以 广 之中板、副中板。 /、衣爾δ板 2 ·阻燃劑:No. 1 89117566 V. Description of the invention (3) Red lauan (Shorea sd) silk has a specific gravity of 0.48 to 0.50, a moisture content of 10 to 12%, and a thickness of 0.2 reverse sheet = dry cut into an area of 30 x 30 (cnf), used as the base plate of the plywood. Slave veneer with Pinus radiata, air-dry specific gravity 0 ~ 0.50, moisture content 7 ~ 10%, medium plate thickness 2 55_, deputy medium plate thickness ^ 2.50mm 'The single plate is also cut into an area 3 〇χ 3〇 (cnf), to the middle plate, vice middle plate. / 、 Yier δ board 2 · Flame retardant:
CNS- 4182、、木材用阻燃劑,,(Type C)及兩種自行組 配之阻燃藥劑共三種。其主成分及基本性質,如( 表一)所示。 3 ·膠合劑: 尿素膠(Urea formaldehyde resin;簡稱UF)。為 乳白色粘稠液體;固形分56· 〇 % ;具福馬林(甲醛) 刺激味;粘度163cps (27 °C) ; pH : 7· 8 (27 °C );膠 化時間:7 0 m i η。There are three types of CNS-4182, wood-based flame retardants, (Type C) and two kinds of self-assembled flame retardants. Its main components and basic properties are shown in (Table 1). 3. Adhesive: Urea formaldehyde resin (UF for short). It is a milky white viscous liquid; its solid content is 56 · 〇%; it has formalin (formaldehyde) irritating taste; viscosity is 163cps (27 ° C); pH: 7.8 (27 ° C); gelation time: 70 m i η.
二聚氰胺膠粉末-尿素膠(Melamine-Urea formald ehyde resin ;簡稱MUF )。性質測定如下:固形分58 % ;粘度1 870cps (27 °C ) ; ρΗ5· 2(27 °C );膠化時 間:90min 〇 4·增量劑·· 麵粉(低筋):含水率11. 2 %。 豆粉:含水率6. 1 %。 5 ·硬化劑:Melamine-Urea formald ehyde resin (MUF for short). The properties are determined as follows: solid content 58%; viscosity 1 870cps (27 ° C); ρΗ5 · 2 (27 ° C); gelation time: 90min 〇4 · extender · flour (low gluten): moisture content 11. 2 %. Soy flour: moisture content of 6.1%. 5 · Hardener:
第8頁 1227185Page 8 1227185
曰 iO^oNLCl 修正 (Π)、試驗方法 以耐燃合板之製造來說,阻燃劑及合板之板材為其基 本之素材,茲就板材及阻燃劑、膠合劑之使用,逐一說明 其材料特性及配合測試讓貴審查委員暸解本案之耐燃合 板/、中華民國國家標準做一比較。至於财燃合板之製造方 法,亦在以下之說明中逐步介紹。 其次就耐燃合板之製造方法說明如後: 1 ·單板阻燃劑加壓注入處理: (1 )各阻燃劑調製成丨5 %重量百分比濃度。 (2) 取氣乾單板,編號、量測體積並秤重(% )。 (3) 以充細胞法真空加壓(FuU cen vacuum—impregna retention ΐ 1 on )進行阻燃劑加壓注入,即將氣乾單板移入加壓 處理槽’密閉之。抽真空(前排氣)72〇mmHg,持續 5 - 1 0分鐘,即行導入阻燃劑,次以〇. 5 kgf/c允 愿力加壓5分鐘。解壓,排出多餘藥劑,俟單板表面 不再滴流後秤重(% )。經下式計算各單板之吸收量 吸收量(kg/ m3) (W2 -W,)Said iO ^ oNLCl correction (Π), the test method is based on the manufacture of flame-resistant plywood, flame retardant and plywood are the basic materials, and the material characteristics of the plate, flame retardant and glue are explained one by one. And cooperate with the test to let your reviewing committee understand the flame retardant plywood of this case / and the national standards of the Republic of China for comparison. As for the manufacturing method of financial and fuel plywood, it will be introduced step by step in the following description. Secondly, the manufacturing method of the flame-resistant plywood is described as follows: 1 · Single-board flame retardant pressure injection treatment: (1) Each flame retardant is prepared to a concentration of 5% by weight. (2) Take the air dry veneer, number, measure the volume and weigh (%). (3) FuU cen vacuum-impregna retention (1 on) is used for pressure injection of the flame retardant, that is, the air-dried veneer is moved into the pressure treatment tank and sealed. Evacuate (front exhaust) 72mmHg for 5-10 minutes, the flame retardant is introduced, and then pressurized at 0.5 kgf / c for 5 minutes. Decompress and discharge the excess medicine. The surface of the veneer is no longer dripped and weighed (%). Calculate the absorption of each veneer by the following formula: Absorption (kg / m3) (W2 -W,)
x C ( % ) V 式中’Wi ••注入前試材氣乾重(kg) w2 :注入後試材重(kg )x C (%) V where ‘Wi •• dry weight of sample gas before injection (kg) w2: weight of sample after injection (kg)
1227185 .,,η,,Β ..日修正 五、發明說明(5) V :試材氣乾體積(m 3 ) C :阻燃劑濃度(% ) 各處理單板置於室内氣乾後轉置恆溫恆濕室,以供製 備合板。 2.其次就耐燃合板之製造方法說明如後: 三種卩且燃劑處理之單板,分別以UF及MUF膠合劑進行 161.5g/m2 (15g/ft2)、i83.0g/m2 (17g/ft2)、2〇 4.5g/m2 (19g/ft2)等三種布膠量之單面布膠製板。 製板條件:1227185. ,, η ,, B .. Daily amendment V. Description of the invention (5) V: Air-dry volume of the sample (m 3) C: Flame retardant concentration (%) Each treated veneer is placed in the room and air-dried. Set a constant temperature and humidity chamber for preparing plywood. 2. Secondly, the manufacturing method of the flame-resistant plywood is described as follows: Three kinds of plywood and fuel-treated veneers are respectively 161.5g / m2 (15g / ft2) and i83.0g / m2 (17g / ft2) with UF and MUF cement. ), 204.5g / m2 (19g / ft2) and other single-sided cloth adhesive boards. Board conditions:
(1 )UF (MUF ):麵粉:豆粉:水:硬化劑=3〇〇 : 22:20:10:1 (>(分)〇 (2) MUF 膠合劑之調製 MF ·· UF =1 : 1 (Wt/Wt )。 (3) 壓締條件:冷壓壓力i〇kgf/cm2,時間1〇分鐘; 熱壓壓力1 0kgf /c m2,時間原則上每1 mm板厚 lmin為之。熱壓溫度11〇〜115°C。 (DI )、在完成耐燃合板後,就未處理試材及處理過之試 材予以測試,說明如後:(1) UF (MUF): Flour: Soy flour: Water: Hardener = 3〇〇: 22: 20: 10: 1 (> (minutes) 〇 (2) Preparation of MUF adhesive MF ·· UF = 1 : 1 (Wt / Wt). (3) Compression conditions: cold pressing pressure i0kgf / cm2, time 10 minutes; hot pressing pressure 10kgf / c m2, time is 1min per 1 mm plate thickness in principle. The hot pressing temperature is 11 ~ 115 ° C. (DI). After the fire-resistant plywood is completed, the untreated test specimen and the treated test specimen are tested, and the description is as follows:
(1 )未處理試材之表面燃燒性 單板分別以UF及MUF為膠合劑進行161. 5、183. 0及204 •5g/m2布膠量之製板,成板WCNS 6532、、建築物室 内襄修材料耐燃性檢驗法〃之耐燃3級為基準進行表 面燃燒試驗,其燃燒後性質列如(表二)所示。各試材 之燃燒性質如下:著火性(tc ) < 180sec ;發熱性 (t(l Θ ) > 350 °C · min ;發煙係數(CA ) >120 ;餘(1) The surface flammable veneer of the untreated test material was made with UF and MUF as adhesives. 161.5, 183.0, and 204 • 5g / m2 cloth glue amount of the board to form a board WCNS 6532, building The surface burning test is performed on the basis of the flame resistance test method of indoor repair materials 〃3, as shown in (Table 2). The combustion properties of each sample are as follows: Ignition (tc) <180sec; Heating (t (l Θ)) > 350 ° C · min; Smoke Coefficient (CA) >120;
第10頁 1227185 修正 -案號 8911 曰 五、發明說明(6) 敲時間(A f ) > 3 〇 s e。。α 。因此,夫卢U仏 责面裂隙寬均大於板厚1 / 1 0 肯分析結果如(表三驗不合格。心及Af性質之鄭 UF>MUF合板(0 〇;〗 兩種膠合板試材燃燒性以 _性夕旦/鄕士 · ievel)。比較布膠量對試材燃 二/響知,由試材心、Af及tc值之鄧肯分析結 ίΠ高四)所示。可知,布膠量較低者,試材之燃 (Π)阻燃劑處理試材之表面燃燒性 二=成板經表面燃燒試驗之燃燒性質,如(表五)所示 w td 0、CA、Af、Ck等性質知,除阻燃劑FR — 一、、二夕合者外’均可通過耐燃3級之試驗標準,顯 示阻燃劑處理對财燃性具相當改善。 (ΠΙ)處理材之耐燃性改善效應 由、(表六)知,處理材之各項燃燒性質均較未處理者 大為改善。各處理材單位吸收量之耐燃性改善(I mpr oving Efficiency ;丨· Ε·)可依下列各式計算 I Etc (未處理材tc平均值)一(處理材tc平均值) 藥劑平均吸收量(kg/ m 3 ) % 2、發熱性改善效應(IE td 0,°C · min(kg/ m3)_i )Page 10 1227185 Amendment-Case No. 8911 Fifth, the description of the invention (6) Knock time (A f) > 3 〇 s e. . α. Therefore, the crack width of the Fruh U 仏 surface is greater than the plate thickness 1/1 0. The analysis results are as follows (Table 3 failed the test. Zheng and UF of the heart and Af properties: MUF plywood (0 〇; 〖) two kinds of plywood test materials burn The properties are shown in (Xing Xidan / 鄕 士 · ievel). Comparing the amount of cloth glue to the test materials is known / recognized, as shown by the Duncan analysis of the test material core, Af, and tc values (high 4). It can be known that the lower the amount of cloth glue, the surface burning of the test material (Π) flame retardant treated sample 2 = the burning properties of the board after the surface burning test, as shown in (Table 5) w td 0, CA Known properties such as Af, Af, Ck, except flame retardants FR-first, second, and night's can pass the flame resistance test level 3, showing that the treatment of flame retardants has a considerable improvement on financial and flammability. (ΠΙ) Effect of improving the flame resistance of the treated material From (Table 6), it is known that the various combustion properties of the treated material are greatly improved compared with those of the untreated one. I mpr oving Efficiency (丨 · Ε ·) of the unit absorption amount of each treatment material can be calculated by the following formula: I Etc (the average value of tc of the untreated material)-(the average value of the tc of the treatment material) kg / m 3)% 2. Fever improvement effect (IE td 0, ° C · min (kg / m3) _i)
1227185 案號 89117566 _3 曰 修正 五、發明說明(7) 發煙改善效應(IE CA, (kg/m3)-1 ); 餘談改善效應(IE Af ’ sec(kg/m3)_i); 重量減少率改善效應(IE WPG ; % (kg/ m 3)-1 ) IE(td Θ, CA,Af, WPG)= (處理材平均值)一(未處理材平均值) 藥劑平均吸收量(kg/ m 3 ) 各項燃燒性質之改善效應如下 IE tc 1 ·53 〜2·0 (sec(kg/ m3 ) _ 1 ) IE td03.32 〜4.73(〇C •minCkg/m3)-1); IE CA 1 · 〇5 〜1. 58 ( (kg/m 3 )_ 1 ); IE WPG 0·24 〜〇·3〇 (%(kg/m3) -1); IE Af 1·31 〜2·52 (sec(kg/m3)-1 )。 此等改善效應之所以有差異,可能與阻燃劑吸收量、 阻燃劑種類、膠合劑種類及布膠量等因子不同有關。茲分 述如下: 1 ·阻燃劑吸收量 阻燃劑吸收量對試材燃燒性之影響,經一次直線迴歸分 析得方程式: td0=-7.17M+776.72 r =0. 63 F =10. 46**1227185 Case No. 89117566 _3 Amendment V. Description of the Invention (7) Smoke improvement effect (IE CA, (kg / m3) -1); I talk about improvement effect (IE Af 'sec (kg / m3) _i); weight reduction Rate improvement effect (IE WPG;% (kg / m 3) -1) IE (td Θ, CA, Af, WPG) = (average of treated material)-(average of untreated material) average absorption of the agent (kg / m 3) The improvement effects of various combustion properties are as follows IE tc 1 · 53 ~ 2 · 0 (sec (kg / m3) _ 1) IE td03.32 ~ 4.73 (〇C • minCkg / m3) -1); IE CA 1 〇5 〜1. 58 ((kg / m 3) _ 1); IE WPG 0 · 24 ~ 〇 · 3〇 (% (kg / m3) -1); IE Af 1.31 ~ 2 · 52 ( sec (kg / m3) -1). The difference between these improvement effects may be related to different factors such as the amount of flame retardant absorption, the type of flame retardant, the type of adhesive, and the amount of cloth glue. The following are summarized as follows: 1 · The amount of flame retardant absorption The effect of flame retardant absorption on the flammability of the test material is obtained by a linear regression analysis: td0 = -7.17M + 776.72 r = 0.63 F = 10. 46 **
Af = -4. 56M + 441.67 r =0. 72 F =17. 68** 式中,td 0、Af及M分別表示發熱性(°C · min )、餘 4日寸間(s e c )及阻燃劑吸收量(k g / m 3 )。Af = -4. 56M + 441.67 r = 0.72 F = 17.68 ** In the formula, td 0, Af, and M respectively represent exothermicity (° C · min), 4 days in inches (sec), and resistance Fuel absorption (kg / m3).
第12頁 1227185 --案號8mi75fifi 年月日 修tPage 12 1227185-Case No. 8mi75fifi Date
五、發明說明(幻 "" "1 " 由式可知,阻燃劑吸收量與試材發熱性(td Θ )及餘 談時間(Af )分別呈一次直線迴歸負相關,經F值檢驗均 具0· 0 1 1 eve 1極顯著相關。即試材中阻燃劑吸收量愈多 ’則試材發熱性及餘燄時間愈低,改善愈大。符合常理。 2 ·阻燃劑種類之影響 由三種阻燃劑(FR — C、FR — L、FR — W )處理,各燃燒 性質如t c、C A及A f之鄭肯分析結果,如(表七)所示得知 ,對tc 及CA 言,FR - C >FR — W、FR —L (0· 〇1 levei ),V. Description of the invention (Fantasy " " " 1 " From the formula, it can be known that the flame retardant absorption amount and the sample heat generation (td Θ) and the time to talk (Af) show a linear regression negative correlation, respectively. The value tests have a very significant correlation of 0 · 0 1 1 eve 1. That is, the more the flame retardant absorption in the test material, the lower the sample's heat generation and afterflame time, the greater the improvement. It is in line with common sense. 2 · Flame retardant The effect of the type of agent is treated by three kinds of flame retardants (FR — C, FR — L, FR — W). The combustion results of tc, CA, and A f are analyzed as shown in (Table 7). For tc and CA, FR-C > FR — W, FR — L (0 · 〇1 levei),
Af 者,FR~W>FR—L、FR—C (0·01 level)。綜合分析顯 示,三種阻燃劑對試材耐燃性改善效應,以FR —L最佳,FR —C次之,而FR — W者最差。此可能因FR _l主要由磷酸銨鹽 類及侧酸所組成,據已知之研究顯示,鱗酸銨鹽類具有脫 水、稀釋及吸熱之機制,並可促使熱分解產生較少量之 Ievog-lUC0san等效益。故為優異之有燄及無燄抑制藥劑 3 ·膠合劑種類 前已言及未處理合板之燃燒性以尿素膠合板較大。阻 燃劑處理材之耐燃性改善效應於不同膠合劑時,由各試材 t d (9及A f性質之鄭肯分析結果顯示,如(表八)所示。均以 UF合板較MUF合板之耐燃性改善效應差。由此可知,無論 · 處理或未處理材,以UF膠合者其耐燃效應均不如MUF膠 者0 4.布膠量之影響 未處理材三種布膠量之燃燒性,顯示以丨6 5.丨g/ m2 > 183· 0 g/ m2 > 204· 5g/ m2。即製板時膠合劑布膠量愈少,For Af, FR ~ W> FR-L, FR-C (0.01 level). Comprehensive analysis shows that the flame retardant improvement effect of the three flame retardants on the test material is best with FR — L, followed by FR — C, and FR — W is the worst. This may be due to the fact that FR_1 is mainly composed of ammonium phosphates and pendant acids. According to known research, ammonium phosphonates have mechanisms of dehydration, dilution and heat absorption, and can promote thermal decomposition to produce a smaller amount of Ievog-lUC0san. And other benefits. Therefore, it is an excellent flame-retardant and non-flame-inhibiting agent. 3 · Types of Glue It has been mentioned that the flammability of untreated plywood is greater than urea plywood. The effect of improving the flame resistance of the flame retardant treated materials is shown in (Table 8) by the analysis of the properties of td (9 and A f) of each test material, as shown in (Table 8). The flame resistance improvement effect is poor. From this, it can be known that the flammability of UF glued materials is not as good as that of MUF glued, regardless of the treated or untreated materials.丨 6 5. 丨 g / m2 > 183 · 0 g / m2 > 204 · 5g / m2. That is, the smaller the amount of adhesive cloth glue when making boards,
12271851227185
試材燃燒性愈大。阻燃劑處理材布膠量對耐燃性之改善效 應可由發煙係數(CA)之鄧肯分析結果如(表九)所示加以 分析。顯示,三種布膠量以2〇4 5 g/m2>183 () g/m2> 1以· lg/ nf (〇· 〇i ievel )。即布膠量較小之處理材反具 較佳之耐燃性改善效應。此與未處理材者有相反的結果。 或係阻燃劑處理對試材耐燃性之提升,遠優於布膠量之 響所致。 ~ (IV)阻燃劑之推估吸收量The greater the flammability of the test material. The flame retardant improvement effect of the amount of the flame retardant treated material can be analyzed by the Duncan analysis result of the smoke coefficient (CA) as shown in (Table 9). It is shown that the amount of the three types of cloth glue is 204 5 g / m2> 183 () g / m2> 1 and 1 lg / nf (〇 〇i ievel). That is, the treated material with a smaller amount of rubber has better flame resistance improvement effect. This has the opposite effect to that of the untreated material. Or the flame retardant treatment improves the flame resistance of the test material, which is far better than the effect of the amount of rubber. ~ (IV) Estimated absorption of flame retardant
、前已言及三種阻燃劑處理之試材,除以FR —W,UF製成之 試材外均可通過耐燃3級試驗。惟就藥劑成本考量,應以 通過C N S 6 5 3 2试驗標準耐燃3級之最少吸收量為宜。推估 此等通過耐燃3級之最少吸收量(kg/ m3 ),可依下列(r t c 、Rtd 0、RCA、RAf)各式計算之。 1· tc推估吸收量(Rtc,kg/m3) 180 - tc 式中,tc為未處理材測值;As mentioned earlier, the test materials treated with the three flame retardants can pass the fire resistance level 3 test except those made of FR-W and UF. However, in consideration of the cost of the medicament, it is advisable to adopt the minimum absorption amount of the flame resistance class 3 which passed the CNS 6 5 3 2 test standard. Estimation The minimum absorption (kg / m3) through flame resistance 3 can be calculated according to the following formulas (r t c, Rtd 0, RCA, RAf). 1. tc estimated absorption (Rtc, kg / m3) 180-tc where tc is the measured value of the untreated material;
Rtc(kg/ m3)=-----Etc為單位體積處理材阻燃劑Rtc (kg / m3) = ----- Etc is flame retardant per unit volume of treated material
Etc 吸收量之t c改善效應;1 8 0為 通過標準(sec)Tc improvement effect of Etc absorption; 1 8 0 means pass standard (sec)
2· td 0 推估吸收量(Rtd Θ,kg/ m3) td θ -350 td 0為未處理材測值2 · td 0 Estimated absorption (Rtd Θ, kg / m3) td θ -350 td 0 is the measured value of untreated material
Rtd Θ (kg/ m3 )------( °C.min) ; ETd Θ 為單位Rtd Θ (kg / m3) ------ (° C.min); ETd Θ is the unit
Etd Θ 體積處理材阻燃劑吸收量Etd Θ Absorption of flame retardants for volume treated materials
1227185 一案號 89117566 五、發明說明(10) 修正 之td Θ改善效應;350為 通過標準(°C· min)。 3· CA推估吸收量(RCA, kg/ m3) CA - 120 CA為未處理材測值,· RCA(kg/m3)=--------- ECA為單位體積處理Case No. 1227185 89117566 V. Description of the invention (10) Modified td Θ improvement effect; 350 means pass standard (° C · min). 3 · CA estimated absorption (RCA, kg / m3) CA-120 CA is the measured value of untreated material, · RCA (kg / m3) = --------- ECA is processed per unit volume
ECA 材阻燃劑吸收量之cA 改善效應;1 2 0為通過標準 4· Af推估吸收量(RAf,kg/ m3 ) RA f ( kg/ xxi 3CA improvement effect of the flame retardant absorption of ECA materials; 1 2 0 is the estimated absorption (RAf, kg / m3) by standard 4 · Af RA f (kg / xxi 3
Af-30 Af為未處理材測值; EAf 一 EAf為單位體積處理材阻 燃劑吸收量之A f改善效應 ;30為通過標準(sec)。 之最為通過耐燃3級表面燃燒試驗各燃燒性質 意即工業上實際操作時 均以UF膠合板所 :2低成本。三種阻燃劑處理材, 估量為最古 收里南於MUF膠合板者。餘談時間之推Af-30 Af is the measured value of untreated material; EAf-EAf is the A f improvement effect of the flame retardant absorption per unit volume of treated material; 30 is the pass standard (sec). Most of them have passed the flammability resistance level 3 surface burning test. Each burning property means that UF plywood is used in industrial practice: 2 low cost. Three flame retardant treated materials, estimated to be the oldest recipients of MUF plywood. I talk about the push of time
cal): =子=談時間應為試材燃燒性之臨界(CM m3 ;fr —[者69 q〜之餘燄推估吸收量為71.9〜89·2 kg/ •〜94-lkg/m3 ;FR —¥者 76·2 〜U85kg/cal): === The talk time should be the critical value of the flammability of the test material (CM m3; fr— [the 69 69 ~~ flame estimated absorption is 71.9 ~ 89 · 2 kg / • ~ 94-lkg / m3; FR — ¥ 76 ~ 2 to U85kg /
第15頁 1227185Page 15 1227185
、,不口上述5平估,最佳製板條件之阻燃劑吸收I, 叫,簾膠者,布膠量2。45—,=里 吸收量69. 9 kg/ m 吸收量76. 2 kg/ m FR—L,腳膠者,布膠量m.5g/ni 里71.9k^ FR_W,MUF 膠者,布膠量 183.0g/nf (V)、阻燃合板之性質檢定 1 ·吸濕性 ~ 吸濕性係材料在大氣中吸水能力高低之 2材料之使用至為重要,因其直接影響強度‘膠3性 =卜観荨性質。由兩種膠合劑製造之 處理合板之吸濕量’均在合格範圍04g内如(表十一 經阻燃劑處理苳試材吸濕量,仍低於〇. 4g,而通 夕里(s )刀別呈一次直線正、負相關,經F值於〜 :則Ξ耆或0·01極顯著相關。換言之,阻燃劑吸收量' 大。布膠量愈小時,吸濕量愈大二 认二 寺此兩項製造條件均應加以考慮之影響。至 妍=要Ξ燃劑對試材吸濕量之影響,由(表十二)之鄧肯分 :結果,示,FR_C>FH>FR_L,惟前兩者無顯著異:刀 1 =觎旦阻燃劑為三者中吸濕量最大者;L阻燃劑最小。三 種布膠量對試材之吸濕量則以隨布膠量增加而減少(〇. 01一 表十三)所示。發明人等曾研究市售無機鹽類 t』處理實木、合板等試材,其吸濕量較未處理材者為 问另有學者指出低分子量藥劑較高分子者易溶於水,故2 , Evaluation of the above 5 levels, the flame retardant absorption of the best board conditions I, called, curtain rubber, cloth glue amount 2.45—, = lining absorption amount 69. 9 kg / m absorption amount 76. 2 kg / m FR—L, foot glue, cloth adhesive amount m.5g / ni 71.9k ^ FR_W, MUF glue, cloth glue amount 183.0g / nf (V), property inspection of flame retardant plywood 1 · Moisture absorption Properties ~ The hygroscopicity of materials is the most important for the use of materials with high water absorption in the atmosphere, because it directly affects the strength of 'gel 3 properties = properties of pueraria. The moisture absorption of the treated plywood made from two kinds of adhesives is within the qualified range of 04g. (Table 11: The moisture absorption of the test material treated with flame retardant is still less than 0.4g, and the Tongxili (s) knife Don't show a linear positive and negative correlation once. If the F value is ~: then Ξ 耆 or 0 · 01 is very significantly correlated. In other words, the flame retardant absorption is large. The smaller the amount of cloth glue, the larger the moisture absorption. The influence of these two manufacturing conditions should be taken into account. Zhiyan = The influence of the flame retardant on the moisture absorption of the test material is determined by Duncan's points in (Table 12): Results, showing that FR_C > FH > FR_L, but The first two are not significantly different: knife 1 = Dandan flame retardant is the largest among the three; L flame retardant is the smallest. The moisture absorption of the three types of cloth glue to the test material increases with the amount of cloth glue. The reduction (0.01 to Table 13) is shown. The inventors have studied commercially available inorganic salts t 'treated solid wood, plywood and other test materials whose moisture absorption is higher than that of untreated materials. Another scholar pointed out that the low molecular weight Those with higher molecules are easily soluble in water, so
第16頁 1227185Page 16 1227185
月 曰 修」 亦使於低相對濕度環境下即會產生相當吸水現象。 2 ·浸水剝離 浸水剝離試驗可檢定合板之膠合性能,本試驗以 ^為主。由浸水剝離試驗(Ί>ί^ Π)結果,未處理合板 {現剝離現象。而阻燃劑處理材除c阻燃劑處理,以 ,均夫F4膠合劑布膠161·5 g/nf者其剝離長度大於2.5cm外 出/見剝離現象如(表十四)所示。顯示,低布膠量下 *然劑會使膠合性能下降。應係阻燃劑組成所致。/ ,學者曾進行以 FR —CZC,pyl〇Hth 及 pyres〇te 理之1ί能,發現經無機鹽類阻燃劑處 材其膠合強度均顯著下降。發明人 鹽類阻燐劑_ # ρ大外人& # 巾口無械 3.含^ 板,其膠合強度亦較未處理者差。 阻燃劑處理後之試材合汆、玄 —^ 加工性質。本$驗 ^ 5 X率不且過鬲,以免影響爾後 準之14%以下處理合板之含水率,均低於合格標 過試驗標準如(表十五^處理之試材除叫者外,均未通 吸收量(M)之關係如下:斤不。而試材含水率(MC)與阻燃劑 UF ••MC = 0.〇4MH1.32 r = 〇. 8〇 F:l719« MU_F .mc = 〇.〇3M + 11.21 r = 〇 88 f:34*〇4^ 欽之ΪΓί理合板之含水率與阻燃劑吸收量呈一次直線迴 知之正相關,經F檢定呈極 至 罝線迴 〇leVe〇 5 …析,如(表十六)所示,顯示三種阻燃劑處理之"Monthly repair" also causes considerable water absorption in low relative humidity environments. 2 · Water Soaking Peeling The water soaking peeling test can test the plywood's gluing performance. This test is mainly based on ^. From the results of the water immersion peel test (Ί > ί ^ Π), untreated plywood {now peeling phenomenon. In addition to the flame retardant treatment of flame retardant treated materials, if the average length of the peeling length is more than 2.5 cm, the average length of the F4 adhesive is 161.5 g / nf, and the peeling phenomenon is shown in (Table 14). It has been shown that, at low cloth glue amounts, natural additives will reduce the gluing performance. It should be caused by the composition of flame retardant. /, Scholars have conducted FR-CZC, pyl〇Hth and pyres〇te 1 energy, and found that the inorganic salt flame retardant materials have significantly reduced their bonding strength. Inventor Salt-type tincture inhibitor_ # ρ 大 外人 &# 口 口 无机 3. Contains ^ board, and its bonding strength is also worse than that of untreated ones. After the flame retardant treatment, the test material is mixed, and processed. This test ^ 5 The X rate should not be too high, so as not to affect the moisture content of the treated plywood below 14%, which is lower than the qualified test standard such as (Table 15 ^ All the treated samples except the caller are all The relationship between the unabsorbed amount (M) is as follows: kg. The moisture content (MC) of the specimen and the flame retardant UF •• MC = 0.04MH1.32 r = 0.80F: l719 «MU_F.mc = 〇.〇3M + 11.21 r = 〇88 f: 34 * 〇4 ^ The moisture content of QinzhiΪΓί plywood is positively correlated with the absorption of flame retardants in a straight line, and it is extremely polarized to 罝 line after F test. leVe〇5 ... As shown in (Table 16), it shows that
12271851227185
者無顯著差異。顯然,三種阻燃劑中僅以FR_L處理合板者 之試材含水率最低且均能通過合格標準。 V、結論There were no significant differences. Obviously, among the three flame retardants, only those with FR_L treated plywood have the lowest moisture content and all can pass the qualification standards. V. Conclusion
三種阻燃劑以充細胞真空加壓法(Full cell vacuum_ impregnation)加壓注入單板後,叮及以肝為膠合劑,單面 布膠161.5〜204.5g/m2,再行製造五層(9_厚)阻燃合板。 經CNS 6532、、建築物室内裝修材料耐燃性檢驗法"之财燃 3級檢驗基準進行表面燃燒試驗,以探討處理材之耐燃性 改善效應及是否合於檢驗標準,推估藥劑最低吸收量並檢 定各項性質。試驗結果如下: 1 ·未處理材均未能通過CNS 6 5 3 2規定之对燃3級標準 。且UF合板較MUF合板之燃燒性高。 2 ·處理材各項燃燒性質之耐燃性改善效應分別為 IEtc :1·53 〜2.0sec(kg/m3 )-丄; IEtd0:3.32 〜4·73 °C •minCkg/m3)-1 ; IECA :1.05 〜1.58(kg/m3 ) _1; IEAf :1.31 〜2.52sec(kg/m3 ) _1; IEWPG :0.24 〜0.30%(kg/m3)-1。After the three flame retardants were injected into the veneer by full cell vacuum impregnation, the liver was used as the adhesive, and the single-sided adhesive was 161.5 ~ 204.5g / m2, and then five layers (9 _Thick) Flame-retardant plywood. The surface burning test was carried out according to the CNS 6532, and the 3rd-grade inspection standard for the fire resistance of building interior decoration materials ", to investigate the improvement of the flame resistance of the treated materials and whether they meet the inspection standards, and to estimate the minimum absorption of the agent And test various properties. The test results are as follows: 1 · None of the untreated materials failed to pass the Grade 3 standard for anti-combustion specified in CNS 6 5 3 2. And UF plywood is more flammable than MUF plywood. 2 · The flame resistance improvement effects of the various combustion properties of the treated materials are Ietc: 1.53 ~ 2.0sec (kg / m3)-丄; IEtd0: 3.32 ~ 4.73 ° C • minCkg / m3) -1; IECA: 1.05 to 1.58 (kg / m3) _1; IEAf: 1.31 to 2.52sec (kg / m3) _1; IEWPG: 0.24 to 0.30% (kg / m3) -1.
3·阻燃劑吸收量愈多,試材發熱性(tci θ )及餘燄時間 (Af )愈低,改善愈差。 曰 4 ·二種阻燃劑之耐燃性改善效應,以j? r 一 [最佳,F R — C次之,FR ~W最差。 5· MUF膠之耐燃性改善效應優於UF者。3. The more the flame retardant absorbs, the lower the exothermic property (tci θ) and afterflame time (Af) of the sample, the worse the improvement. Said 4 · The flame retardant improvement effect of two flame retardants, with j? R a [best, F R — C second, and FR ~ W the worst. 5. MUF adhesive has better flame resistance improvement than UF.
第18頁 1227185 _ 案號 89117566_年 ! 日__ 五、發明說明(14) 6·布膠量對處理材耐燃性改善效應,i61. 5g/m2及183 • Og/m2 > 204· 5g/m2 〇 7·各試材通過耐燃3級之推估藥劑吸收量為fr —C 71.Page 18 1227185 _ case number 89117566_ year! Day __ 5. Description of the invention (14) 6 · Effect of improving the flame resistance of the treated material by the amount of cloth glue, i61. 5g / m2 and 183 • Og / m2 > 204 · 5g / m2 〇7 · Each test material passed the flame resistance 3 The estimated amount of medicament absorption is fr-C 71.
9〜89.2kg/m3;FR-L69.9〜94.1kg/m3&FR-W 76· 2 〜118· 5kg/ m3 〇 8 ·未處理及處理合板之吸濕性檢驗均可通過試驗標準 ^處理合板之吸濕量與阻燃劑吸收量呈正相關與布 膠里呈負相關。FR-C阻燃劑處理者吸濕量最大;ρ R-L者小;布膠量愈小吸濕量愈大。 9·除FR-C阻燃劑處理及MUF、叮布膠1615g/m2者外, 其餘處理材均無剝離現象(Type Π),通過合格標準 I 0 ·阻燃d處理合板之含水率與阻燃劑吸收量呈正相 g。僅FR-L阻燃劑處理合板之含水率可通過檢驗標9 ~ 89.2kg / m3; FR-L69.9 ~ 94.1kg / m3 & FR-W 76 · 2 ~ 118 · 5kg / m3 〇8 · The hygroscopicity test of untreated and treated plywood can pass the test standard ^ treatment The moisture absorption of plywood has a positive correlation with the amount of flame retardant absorption and a negative correlation with the fabric. The FR-C flame retardant treatment has the largest moisture absorption; the ρ R-L has a smaller absorption; the smaller the amount of cloth glue, the greater the moisture absorption. 9 · Except for FR-C flame retardant treatment and MUF, 1615g / m2, the other treatment materials have no peeling (Type Π), pass the qualified standard I 0 · Water content and resistance of flame retardant d treated plywood The amount of fuel absorbed was normal phase g. Only FR-L flame retardant treated plywood can pass the inspection standard
II · 阻燃劑之耐燃改善效應及性質檢定’以FII · Flame resistance improvement effect and property test of flame retardant ’
I227185 圖式簡單說明 為便 知者與本 附表 表一 表二 ^號 891175fifi Λ___3. 曰 修正 試 表五 於貝審查委員較易於瞭解本案之優點,茲就習 案所採用之阻燃劑所製成而耐燃合板之過程及測 說明如後: 阻燃劑之主要組成與基本性質 未處理合板之各項表面燃燒性質 未處理合板發熱性及餘燄時間之鄧肯分析結果 未處理UF及MUF膠合板試材燃燒性質之鄧肯分 析結果 阻燃劑理處理材經CNS— 6 5 3 2表面試驗後 之燃燒性質及判定結果 處理材單位吸收量之耐燃性改善效應 阻燃劑種類與試材各燃燒性質之鄭肯分析於 阻燃劑處理合板之發熱性及餘燄時間之二^ 析結果 3邱月分 阻燃劑處理合板發煙係數鄧肯分析於果 各試材通過燃3級之推估吸收量 一 阻燃合板之吸濕測定結果 二 三種阻燃劑對試材吸濕量之鄭肯分士 三三種布膠量對試材吸濕量之鄧肯^二=果 四 阻燃合板之浸水剝離檢驗結果 、、"果 五 阻燃合板之含水率檢驗結果 六三種阻燃劑處理對試材含水率之鄭肯八 結果I227185 The schematic illustration is for the convenience of the reader and Table 2 of the First Schedule of this Schedule. No. 891175fifi Λ ___ 3. It is easier to understand the advantages of this case by reviewing the revised Test Table 5 and the review committee of Yubei. The process and measurement description of the finished flame-resistant plywood are as follows: The main composition and basic properties of flame retardants. The surface burning properties of untreated plywood. The Duncan analysis results of the heat treatment and afterflame time of the untreated plywood. The results of Duncan analysis of the burning properties of the materials. The combustion properties and judgment results of the flame retardant physical treatment materials after the surface test of CNS— 6 5 3 2. The flame resistance improvement effect of the unit absorption of the treated materials. Zheng Ken analyzed the heat generation and afterflame time of flame retardant treated plywood ^ Analysis result 3 Qiu Yuefen The flame retardant treatment of plywood treated with flame retardant Duncan analysis. Moisture absorption test results of flame retardant plywood Two or three kinds of flame retardants for the moisture absorption of the test material Zheng Kenfen Three or three kinds of cloth glue amount for the moisture absorption of the test material Duncan Results from test ,, " test result if the water content of five plywood sixty-three kinds flame retardant treatment of wood moisture content again Ken Jeong Results Eight
第20頁Page 20
Claims (1)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
TW89117566A TWI227185B (en) | 2000-08-30 | 2000-08-30 | Manufacturing method of a fire retardant plywood |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
TW89117566A TWI227185B (en) | 2000-08-30 | 2000-08-30 | Manufacturing method of a fire retardant plywood |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
TWI227185B true TWI227185B (en) | 2005-02-01 |
Family
ID=35696286
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
TW89117566A TWI227185B (en) | 2000-08-30 | 2000-08-30 | Manufacturing method of a fire retardant plywood |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
TW (1) | TWI227185B (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101491904A (en) * | 2009-03-12 | 2009-07-29 | 沈孜明 | Production method of antiseptic fire-retardation artificial board |
CN109396986A (en) * | 2018-11-09 | 2019-03-01 | 江苏银泰电气科技有限公司 | A kind of high-temperature insulation composite board and preparation method thereof |
-
2000
- 2000-08-30 TW TW89117566A patent/TWI227185B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101491904A (en) * | 2009-03-12 | 2009-07-29 | 沈孜明 | Production method of antiseptic fire-retardation artificial board |
CN109396986A (en) * | 2018-11-09 | 2019-03-01 | 江苏银泰电气科技有限公司 | A kind of high-temperature insulation composite board and preparation method thereof |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6620349B1 (en) | Fire retardant compositions and methods for preserving wood products | |
CN106164207B (en) | Adhesive material and method of forming lignocellulosic composite using the same | |
US8084523B2 (en) | Processes and manufacturing methods to produce an aqueous thermosetting fire-rated fire-retardant polymeric adhesive composition for manufacturing interior or exterior fire-rated cellulosic products | |
US3874990A (en) | Flame-retardant particle-board and process for making same | |
CN101259629B (en) | Wood fire retardant and wood veneer flame-proof processing technique | |
CN103612292A (en) | Manufacturing method of flame-retardant plywood | |
CN105291222A (en) | Composite flame retardant for plywood and application of plywood | |
WO2021022445A1 (en) | Wooden fireproof pressure-treated board and manufacturing method therefor | |
Özdemir et al. | Effects of coating with calcite together with various fire retardants on the fire properties of particleboard | |
CN108262828A (en) | A kind of wood fire retardant and its application | |
US10894338B2 (en) | Method for the production of artificial wood board | |
Bryn et al. | The effect of diffusive impregnation of birch veneers with fire retardant on plywood properties | |
TWI227185B (en) | Manufacturing method of a fire retardant plywood | |
CN105459222B (en) | A kind of fire-proof plywood or laminated veneer lumber and its manufacture method | |
Subyakto et al. | Improving fire retardancy of fast growing wood by coating with fire retardant and surface densification | |
Wang et al. | Structural performance of fire-retardant treated plywood: effect of elevated temperature | |
CN108972751A (en) | Environment friendly aldehyde-free fire retardant and wood-based plate processing method | |
Medved et al. | Investigation of fire-retardant additive on particleboard properties | |
Torun | Investigation of the properties of fiberboards made from microcrystalline cellulose and antimony trioxide added melamine formaldehyde adhesive | |
Yu et al. | Study of burning behaviors and fire risk of flame retardant plywood by cone calorimeter and TG test | |
Baysal | Combustion properties of wood impregnated with commercial fertilizers | |
CA2256398A1 (en) | Fireproofing agent for particle or fibre boards | |
JP7178107B2 (en) | Wooden fireproof fiberboard and its manufacturing method | |
Getto et al. | The functional gradient of fire resistance laminated board | |
Aydin et al. | Effect of fire retardant chemicals on formaldehyde emission of plywood |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
MM4A | Annulment or lapse of patent due to non-payment of fees |