KR20190131688A - Complex electrolyte membrane for PEMFC, manufacturing method thereof and membrane electrode assembly containing the same - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a complex electrolyte membrane for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC), a membrane-electrode assembly containing the same, a fuel cell and a manufacturing method thereof and, more specifically, to a complex electrolyte membrane having improved durability by controlling the content and distribution of radical scavengers in the complex electrolyte membrane and a membrane-electrode assembly. The complex electrolyte membrane for PEMFC comprises a first ionomer layer disposed in an anode direction and a second ionomer layer disposed in support layer and cathode directions.

Description

Complex electrolyte membrane for PEMFC, manufacturing method thereof, and membrane-electrode assembly for PEMFC, including the same

The present invention relates to a composite electrolyte membrane used in a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC), a composite electrolyte membrane prepared by introducing a specific support, and different radical scavenger distribution in each layer of the support and ionomer, membrane using the same An electrode assembly, a fuel cell comprising the same, and a method of manufacturing the same.

A fuel cell is a power generation system that directly converts chemical energy generated by electrochemical reaction between fuel (hydrogen or methanol) and oxidant (oxygen) to electrical energy.It is an eco-friendly feature with high energy efficiency and low emission of pollutants. Research and development. The fuel cell can be used by selecting a fuel cell for high temperature and low temperature according to the application field, and is generally classified according to the type of electrolyte. For high temperature, a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and molten carbonate are used. Fuel cell (Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell, MCFC) and the like, Alkaline Fuel Cell (AFC) and Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) are being developed for low temperature.

Subdivided into a double polymer electrolyte fuel cell is a hydrogen ion exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) that uses hydrogen gas as a fuel, and direct methanol that supplies liquid methanol directly to the anode as a fuel. Fuel cell (Direct Methanol Fuel Cell, DMFC). BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Polymer electrolyte fuel cells have been in the spotlight as portable, automotive, and home power supplies for their low operating temperatures of less than 100 ° C., elimination of leakage problems due to the use of solid electrolytes, fast startup and response characteristics, and excellent durability. In particular, as a high output fuel cell having a higher current density than other types of fuel cells, it is possible to miniaturize, and thus research into a portable fuel cell continues.

The unit cell structure of the fuel cell has a structure in which an anode (anode, fuel electrode) and a cathode (cathode, oxygen electrode) are coated on both sides of an electrolyte membrane made of a polymer material, which is a membrane-electrode assembly (Membrane). Electrode Assembly (MEA). The membrane-electrode assembly (MEA) is a portion in which an electrochemical reaction between hydrogen and oxygen occurs and is composed of a cathode, an anode, and an electrolyte membrane, that is, an ion conductive electrolyte membrane (eg, a hydrogen ion conductive electrolyte membrane).

In the anode, hydrogen or methanol, which is a fuel, is supplied to generate an oxidation reaction of hydrogen to generate hydrogen ions and electrons. In the cathode, water is generated by a reduction reaction of oxygen by combining hydrogen ions and oxygen that have passed through the polymer electrolyte membrane. .

The membrane-electrode assembly has a form in which the electrode catalyst layers of the anode and the cathode are coated on both sides of the ion conductive electrolyte membrane, and the material forming the electrode catalyst layer is Pt (platinum), Pt-Ru (platinum-ruthenium), or the like. The catalyst substance of is supported on the carbon carrier. Membrane-electrode assembly (MEA), which can be seen as a key component of the electrochemical reaction of fuel cells, is especially used for ion-conducting electrolyte membranes and platinum catalysts, which have a high price ratio, and is directly related to power production efficiency. It is considered as the most important part in improving the performance and increasing the price competitiveness.

Conventional methods for preparing MEAs that are commonly used include preparing a paste by mixing a catalyst material, a hydrogen ion conductive binder, ie, a fluorine-based Nafion ionomer, and water and / or an alcohol solvent, It is coated with a carbon cloth or carbon paper that serves as an electrode support that supports the catalyst layer and at the same time serves as a gas diffusion layer, and then dry and heat-bond the hydrogen ion conductive electrolyte membrane.

Redox reaction of hydrogen and oxygen by the catalyst in the catalyst layer; Transfer of electrons by tightly bonded carbon particles; Securing passages for supplying hydrogen, oxygen and moisture and for discharging excess gas after the reaction; The movement of oxidized hydrogen ions must be carried out at the same time. Furthermore, in order to improve performance, the area of the triple phase boundary where the feed fuel, the catalyst and the ion conductive polymer electrolyte membrane meet must be increased to reduce the activation polarization, and the interface between the catalyst layer and the electrolyte membrane and the catalyst layer The interface between the gas diffusion layer and the gas must be uniformly bonded to reduce ohmic polarization at the interface. Therefore, in order to improve the performance of the fuel cell by reducing the interface resistance between the catalyst layer and the electrolyte membrane as much as possible, not only the bonding force between the catalyst layer and the electrolyte membrane should be provided during MEA production, but also the interface bonding between the catalyst layer and the electrolyte membrane during the fuel cell operation is performed. It must be maintained.

Therefore, in recent years, the development of technology for uniformly bonding the interface between the catalyst layer and the electrolyte membrane and the interface between the catalyst layer and the gas diffusion layer has been actively made, but the interface uniformity still has a disadvantage.

In addition, since the MEA having the above-described structure typically uses a thick electrolyte membrane, the transfer of hydrogen ions may be delayed, thereby degrading performance.

In addition, as the movement and use time of the hydrogen ions become longer during driving of the fuel cell, the interface between the catalyst layer and the electrolyte membrane and the interface bonding between the catalyst layer and the gas diffusion layer become weak and are separated from each other. Thus, when applied to the fuel cell may cause a decrease in the performance of the fuel cell.

In order to shorten the migration time of hydrogen ions, there is a method of reducing the thickness of the electrolyte membrane, and to this end, there is a method of thinning the thickness of the porous support constituting the electrolyte membrane. In order to reduce the thickness of the support, physical properties such as strength of the support during high stretching are required. Not only is this greatly reduced, there is a problem that the economical efficiency and commercial viability was deteriorated due to a high defect rate during the support production.

Republic of Korea Patent Publication KR 2010-0077483 A (2010.07.08)

The present invention has been made to solve the above problems, by adjusting the particle diameter of the radical scavenger used in the electrolyte membrane to improve the durability of the polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) to effectively remove the radicals to improve the durability It is to provide a composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC. In addition, by applying a specific support to the support of the PEMFC composite electrolyte membrane, by reducing the overall thickness of the fuel cell electrolyte membrane composite electrolyte membrane with improved performance of the fuel cell, a manufacturing method thereof and a membrane-electrode assembly, a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell To provide.

The composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC (Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell) of the present invention for solving the above problems is a first ionomer layer disposed in the anode direction; And a second ionomer layer disposed in a support layer and a cathode direction, wherein the first ionomer layer and the second ionomer layer include a radical scavenger so as to satisfy Equation 1 below.

Equation 1

Radical scavenger average particle diameter in the first ionomer layer> Radical scavenger average particle diameter in the second ionomer layer

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the radical scavenger in the first ionomer layer may have an average particle diameter of 30 to 100 nm, and the radical scavenger in the second ionomer layer may have an average particle diameter of 1 to 30 nm.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the ratio of the average content of the radical scavenger in the first ionomer layer and the average content of the radical scavenger in the second ionomer layer may be included in a weight ratio of 1: 1.25 to 10.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, in the composite electrolyte membrane of the present invention, the radical scavenger distribution in the first ionomer layer may satisfy Equation 2 below.

[Equation 2]

D _{60 ~ 100} > D _{0 ~ 40}

In Equation 2, D _{0 to 40} and D _{60 to 100} represent radical scavengers in the total weight of the radical scavenger in the ionomer layer at a distance away from the junction surface between the first ionomer layer and the support in the thickness direction of the support. (% By weight), and when the end distance of the first ionomer layer farthest from the bonding surface between the first ionomer layer and the support is 100%, D _{0 to 40} represent the first ionomer from the bonding surface. The radical scavenger content (% by weight) in the first ionomer layer located at a distance of 0% to 40% in the direction of the end of the layer, and D _60-100 is 60% in the direction of the end of the first ionomer layer from the bonding surface. It means the content (% by weight) of the radical scavenger in the first ionomer layer located at a distance of ˜100%.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, in the composite electrolyte membrane of the present invention, with respect to the radical scavenger content in the first ionomer layer, the radical scavenger content of the D _{60 ~ 100} is 0.6 ~ 2.4 wt% , The radical scavenger content of D _{0 ~ 40} may be 0.01 ~ 0.6% by weight.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, in the composite electrolyte membrane of the present invention, the radical scavenger distribution in the second ionomer layer satisfies Equation 3 below;

[Equation 3]

D _{60 ~ 100} > D _{0 ~ 40}

In Equation 3, D _{0 to 40} and D _{60 to 100} represent radical scavengers in the total weight of the radical scavenger in the ionomer layer at a distance away from the junction surface between the second ionomer layer and the support in the thickness direction of the support. (% By weight), and when the end distance of the second ionomer layer farthest from the bonding surface between the first ionomer layer and the support is based on 100%, D _{0 to 40} represent a second ionomer from the bonding surface. The radical scavenger content in the second ionomer layer located at a distance of 0% to 40% in the direction of the end of the layer, and D _60-100 represents 60% to the end of the second ionomer layer from the bonding surface. It means the content (%) of the radical scavenger in the second ionomer layer located at a distance of 100%.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, in the composite electrolyte membrane of the present invention, with respect to the radical scavenger content contained in the second ionomer layer, the radical scavenger content of D _{'60 ~ 100} is 0.8 ~ 3 It becomes radical scavenger content of the% by weight and, D _{'0 ~ 40} may be 0.1 ~ 0.8% by weight.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the radical scavenger is selected from Group 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 elements, Zn, Al, La and Ce It may include an oxide of a metal containing at least one kind.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the nonionic radical scavenger may include a metal oxide including cerium oxide, zirconium oxide, manganese oxide, aluminum oxide, vanadium oxide, cerium and zinc.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, in the composite electrolyte membrane of the present invention, the radical scavenger is CeO, CeO ₂ , Ce ₂ O ₃ , ZnO, MnO ₂ , Mn ₂ O ₃ , Mn ₃ O ₄ , ZrO _At least one radical scavenger selected from ₂ , and MoO ₃ .

In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the inorganic radical scavenger may include CeZnO-based metal oxide particles having a crystal structure consisting of cerium (Ce), zinc (Zn) and oxygen (O) atoms, the The crystal structure may be a crystal structure in which some of the zinc atoms in the ZnO crystal structure are substituted with cerium atoms.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the CeZnO-based metal oxide particles are measured by EDS (Energy Dispersive Spectrometer), Ce (cerium) 12 ~ 91% by weight, Zn (zinc) 7 ~ 84.5% by weight and the balance of O ( Oxygen).

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the support used in the composite electrolyte membrane of the present invention may include a poly tetra fluoro ethylene (PTFE) porous support.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the PTFE porous support has a tensile strength of 40 MPa or more in the uniaxial direction (length direction) and 40 MPa in the biaxial direction (width direction) when measured according to the ASTM D 822 method. It may be abnormal.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the PTFE porous support of the present invention, when measured according to ASTM D 882, the uniaxial direction (length direction) tensile strength of 40 MPa or more and the biaxial direction (width direction) tensile strength 40 MPa or more.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the PTFE porous support of the present invention, when measured according to ASTM D 882, uniaxial modulus and biaxial modulus value may satisfy the following equation 4.

[Equation 4]

0 ≤ │ (uniaxial modulus-biaxial modulus) / (uniaxial modulus) ⅹ 100% │ ≤ 54%

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the PTFE porous support may have a draw ratio of 3 to 10 times in one axis direction (length direction), and a draw ratio of 15 to 50 times in biaxial direction (width direction).

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the PTFE porous support may have a uniaxial direction (length direction) draw ratio of 6 to 9.5 times and a biaxial direction (width direction) draw ratio of 25 to 45 times.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the PTFE porous support may have a draw ratio of 6.2 to 9 times in one axis direction (length direction) and a draw ratio of 28 to 45 times in biaxial direction (width direction).

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the porous support of the present invention has a draw ratio (or aspect ratio) in the uniaxial direction (length direction) and biaxial direction (width direction) of 1: 3.00 to 8.5, preferably 1: 3.50 It may be ~ 7.0.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the PTFE porous support may have an average pore size of 0.080㎛ ~ 0.20㎛, the average porosity may be 60 ~ 90%.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the PTFE porous support may be an average thickness of 5 ~ 25㎛.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC of the present invention, when measured according to ASTM D 882, may have a uniaxial modulus of 50 MPa or more and a biaxial modulus of 50 MPa or more.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the fuel cell electrolytic straight film of the present invention, when measured according to the ASTM D 822 method, the tensile strength in the uniaxial direction (length direction) 50 MPa or more and the biaxial direction (width direction) tensile strength May be at least 48 MPa.

Another object of the present invention relates to a method for producing a composite electrolyte membrane of the various forms described above, the first step of preparing a PTFE porous support; Forming a first ionomer layer on one surface of the PTFE porous support; Forming a second ionomer layer on the other surface of the support on which the first ionomer layer is formed; And a four step of heat-treating the PTFE porous support having the first ionomer layer and the second ionomer layer formed thereon, thereby preparing a composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC.

In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the PTFE porous support of step 1 is a step 1-1 to prepare a paste by mixing and stirring the PTFE powder and the liquid lubricant; 1-2 steps of aging the paste; 1-3 to produce an unbaked tape by extruding and rolling the aged paste; 1 to 4 steps of drying the unbaked tape and removing the liquid lubricant; 1-5 steps of uniaxially stretching the unbaked tape from which the lubricant is removed; 1-6 steps of biaxially stretching the uniaxially stretched unbaked tape; And it may be prepared by performing a process comprising; 1-7 step of firing.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the paste of step 1-1 may include 15 to 35 parts by weight of lubricant based on 100 parts by weight of PTFE powder.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, as the liquid lubricant, in addition to hydrocarbon oils such as liquid paraffin, naphtha, white oil, toluene, and xylene, various alcohols, ketones, esters, and the like can be used, and preferably liquid paraffin. One or more selected from, naphtha and white oils may be used.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the aging step 1-2 may be performed by leaving for 12 to 24 hours at a temperature of 30 ℃ to 70 ℃.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the extrusion in steps 1-3 may be performed by compressing the aged paste in a compressor to produce a PTFE block, and then pressing the PTFE block under pressure at a pressure of 0.069 to 0.200 Ton / cm ^2. have.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the rolling in steps 1-3 may be performed by a calendering process under 50 to 100 ° C. with a hydraulic pressure of 5 to 10 MPa.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the drying step 1-4 is a process for removing the lubricant, it is possible to perform drying under 100 ℃ ~ 200 ℃ while moving the unbaked tape at a speed of 1 ~ 5M / min.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the uniaxial stretching of steps 1-5 is performed by unbaked tape, in which the lubricant is removed, in a length direction of 3 to 10 times, preferably 6 to 9.5 times, more preferably 6.2 to 9 times. Stretching can be performed.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the uniaxial stretching of steps 1-5 may be performed at a stretching speed of 6 to 12 M / min under a stretching temperature of 260 ° C to 350 ° C.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the biaxial stretching of the step 1-6 is 15 to 50 times, preferably 25 to 45 times, more preferably 28 to 45 times the uniaxially stretched unbaked tape in the width direction Stretching can be performed.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the biaxial stretching of steps 1-6 may be performed at a stretching speed of 10 to 20 M / min under a stretching temperature of 150 ℃ to 260 ℃.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the firing in steps 1-7 may be performed under a temperature of 350 ° C to 450 ° C.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, steps 1-8 in which the porous support prepared by performing the step 1-7 is impregnated in the fluorine ionomer solution; And 1-9 to dry and heat-treat the impregnated PTFE porous support.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the fluorine-based ionomer solution of steps 1-8 may further include one or more moisture absorbents selected from the group consisting of zeolite, titania, zirconia, and montmorillonite.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the fluorine-based ionomer solution of steps 1-8 may further include 0.05 to 5% by weight of hollow silica in the total weight of the solution.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the fluorine-based ionomer may include one or more selected from Nafion, Flemion and Aciplex.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the drying of steps 1-9 is performed for 1 to 30 minutes at a temperature of 60 ℃ ~ 100 ℃, the heat treatment is performed for 1 to 5 minutes at a temperature of 100 ℃ ~ 200 ℃ Can be.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the porous support heat-treated in steps 1-9 may have a volume of the occluded pores greater than 90% by volume relative to the total pore volume.

Another object of the present invention relates to a membrane-electrode assembly (MEA) for PEMFC, comprising: an anode (anode); Anode catalyst layer; The composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC; Cathode catalyst layer; And a cathode (reduction electrode).

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a gas diffusion layer may be further included between the anode and the anode catalyst layer and between the cathode and the cathode catalyst layer.

Another object of the present invention relates to a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell, comprising: an electricity generating unit generating electricity through an electrochemical reaction between a fuel and an oxidant; A fuel supply unit supplying fuel to the electricity generation unit; And an oxidant supplier for supplying an oxidant to the generator, wherein the electricity generator includes the membrane-electrode assembly and the separator.

In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell includes a membrane-electrode assembly and a separator, the step of forming an electricity generating unit for generating electricity through the electrochemical reaction of the fuel and the oxidant; Forming a stack between the membrane and the electrode assembly through a separator; Forming a fuel supply unit supplying fuel to the electricity generation unit; And forming an oxidant supply unit for supplying an oxidant to the electricity generating unit.

Since the composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC of the present invention has an optimal content and distribution of radical scavengers, it is possible to efficiently trap radicals such as HO · and / or HOO · to improve membrane-electrode assembly durability. In addition, by applying a specific support, it is possible to reduce the overall thickness of the composite electrolyte membrane to improve the performance of the fuel cell.

1 is a schematic diagram of a composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a schematic diagram of a composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC according to an embodiment of the present invention, a schematic diagram for explaining the radical scavenger distribution in the ionomer layer of the composite electrolyte membrane.
3 is a SEM measurement photograph of the CeZnO radical scavenger prepared in Preparation Example 2-1.
4 is an EDS (Energy Dispersive Spectrometer, or EDAX) measurement result of the CeZnO radical scavenger prepared in Preparation Example 2-1.
5A and 5B illustrate CeZnO metal oxide particles of Preparation Example 2-2. The results of nanoparticle size analysis before and after dispersion and Nafion mixing.
6A and 6B show CeO ₂ Metal oxide particles The results of nanoparticle size analysis before and after dispersion and Nafion mixing.
7 is a test result of dispersion stability measurement performed in Experimental Example 3, (a) is a photograph taken immediately after mixing 1% by weight of CeZnO and Nafion, and (b) is a photograph taken after (a) for 24 hours. Picture taken after elapse. And (c) CeO ₂ It was a picture taken immediately after mixing the weight% and Nafion, and (d) is a picture taken 24 hours later after the picture (c) was taken.
8 is a schematic diagram of a membrane-electrode assembly according to one preferred embodiment of the present invention.

Hereinafter, the composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC (Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell) of the present invention will be described in more detail.

As shown in FIG. 1, the composite electrolyte membrane 10 for PEMFC of the present invention comprises: a first ionomer layer 2 disposed in an anode direction; And a second ionomer layer (3) disposed in the support layer (1) and the cathode (cathode) direction. The first ionomer layer 2 and the second ionomer layer 3 comprise a radical scavenger. In addition, the support layer 1 may also include a radical scavenger of the first ionomer layer and the second ionomer layer.

Radicals generated during fuel cell operation or idle state are generated more at the anode than at the cathode, and in the electrolyte layer formed on both sides of the support, the electrolyte layer portion toward the electrode (anode or cathode) direction than the support portion portion of the electrolyte layer. More radicals are generated and / or present. Accordingly, the present invention is to improve the durability of the membrane-electrode assembly while preventing problems caused by excessive use of radical scavenger by controlling the distribution and the amount of the radical scavenger in the electrolyte membrane (layer).

To this end, the present invention uses a radical scavenger in the first ionomer layer and the second ionomer layer to satisfy the following equation (1).

Equation 1

Radical scavenger average particle diameter in the first ionomer layer> Radical scavenger average particle diameter in the second ionomer layer

Preferably, the radical scavenger in the first ionomer layer may have an average particle diameter of 30 to 100 nm, and the radical scavenger in the second ionomer layer may have an average particle diameter of 1 to 30 nm, and more preferably, the radical scavenger in the one ionomer layer. The decrease may have an average particle diameter of 50 to 95 nm, and the radical scavenger in the second ionomer layer may have an average particle diameter of 8 to 28 nm.

Preferably, the average content of the radical scavenger in the first ionomer layer and the average content of the radical scavenger in the second ionomer layer are in a ratio of 1: 1.25 to 10 by weight, preferably in a ratio of 1: 1.25 to 5 by weight, more preferably. Preferably 1: 1.25 to 3 by weight.

More specifically, the radical scavenger distribution in the first ionomer layer satisfies Equation 2 below. And, preferably, with respect to the radical scavenger content in the first ionomer layer, the radical scavenger content of D _60-100 is 0.6-2.4 wt%, and the radical scavenger content of D _0-40 is 0.01- 0.6 wt% is preferred.

[Equation 2]

D _{60 ~ 100} > D _{0 ~ 40}

In Equation 2, D _{0 to 40} and D _{60 to 100} represent an ionomer layer at a distance away from the junction surface between the first ionomer layer and the support in the thickness direction of the support (the ionomer layer region of the dotted line region L1 or L2 of FIG. 2). It means the content of the radical scavenger in the total weight of the radical scavenger (weight%), and the end distance of the first ionomer layer farthest from the junction surface between the first ionomer layer and the support is viewed based on 100%. when, D _{0 ~ 40} is, D _{60 ~ 100,} and means a content (% by weight) of the first ionomer layer becomes within the radical scavengers located at a distance of 10% ~ 40% in the first ionomer layer end direction from the junction surface Means the content (% by weight) of the radical scavenger in the first ionomer layer located at a distance of 60% to 90% in the direction of the end of the first ionomer layer from the bonding surface.

In addition, it is preferable that the radical scavenger distribution in the second ionomer layer satisfies Equation 3 below, and preferably, in relation to the radical scavenger content in the second ionomer layer, the radical scavenger content of D ′ _{60 to 100} Is 0.8 to 3.0% by weight, and the radical scavenger content of D ' _{0 to 40} is preferably 0.1 to 0.8% by weight.

 [Equation 3]

D _{'60 ~ 100} >D' _{0 ~ 40}

In Equation 3, D ' _{0 to 40} and D' _{60 to 100} are ionomer layers at a distance away from the junction surface between the second ionomer layer and the support in the thickness direction of the support (the ionomer layer of the dotted line L3 or L4 in FIG. 2). It means the content of the radical scavenger (% by weight) of the total weight of the radical scavenger in the portion), and the distance between the end of the second ionomer layer farthest from the junction surface of the first ionomer layer and the support is 100%. In terms of, D ' _{0 ~ 40} means the content of the radical scavenger (%) in the second ionomer layer located at a distance of 10% to 40% in the direction of the end of the second ionomer layer from the bonding surface, D' _{60 to 100} refers to the content (%) of the radical scavenger in the second ionomer layer located at a distance of 60% to 90% in the direction of the end of the second ionomer layer from the bonding surface.

[Radical Scavenger ]

The radical scavenger used in each of the first ionomer layer and / or the second ionomer layer of the composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC of the present invention may be the same or different from each other, and the radical scavenger may use an inorganic radical scavenger. In addition, it is possible to secure ion conductivity and excellent durability by disposing an inorganic radical scavenger having a desired size inside the electrolyte membrane rather than using an ionic radical scavenger.

In addition, the inorganic radical scavenger may be used an inorganic radical scavenger generally used in the art, preferably Group 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Oxides of metals containing at least one selected from Group 11 elements, Zn, Al, La, and Ce may be used singly or mixed, more preferably cerium oxide, zirconium oxide, manganese oxide, aluminum oxide, vanadium oxide Metal oxides containing cerium and zinc may be discontinued or mixed. More specifically, as a nonionic radical scavenger, at least one selected from CeO, CeO ₂ , Ce ₂ O ₃ , ZnO, MnO ₂ , Mn ₂ O ₃ , Mn ₃ O ₄ , ZrO ₂ , and MoO ₃ It may include.

In addition, the inorganic radical scavenger may include CeZnO metal oxide, and is a metal oxide particle having a crystal structure composed of the CeZnO metal oxide cerium (Ce) atom, zinc (Zn) atom and oxygen (O) atom. In the ZnO crystal structure having a wurtzite crystal structure, some of the Zn atoms may be substituted with Ce atoms. The CeZnO metal oxide may include Ce 12 to 91% by weight, Zn 7 to 84.5% by weight and the balance of O, preferably Ce 13.40 to 89.20% by weight, Zn 7.55 to 88.20% by weight and the balance of O You may. And, it may further include other unavoidable impurities. In addition, the CeZnO metal oxide may be 200 nm or less, preferably 160 nm or less, and more preferably 45 to 160 nm when the particle size (D50) is analyzed by a DLS (Dynamic Light Scattering) nanoparticle size analyzer. The Ce-Zn-O metal oxide is semi-permanently removed by the Ce ions Ce ^{3 +} and / or Ce ^{4 +} to capture the radicals such as HO · and / or HOO · generated when the fuel cell operation.

In the inorganic radical scavenger, the CeZnO metal oxide is mixed with the [Zn (OH) ₄ ] ² -containing solution and reacted with a Ce precursor aqueous solution to form a CeZnO metal oxide particle having a ZnO crystal structure doped with cerium ions. Can be prepared. Here, “Cn ion-doped ZnO crystal structure” means that a ZnO crystal structure having a Wurtzite crystal structure has a newly formed crystal structure in which some of the Zn atoms are substituted with Ce atoms.

In the following description, a method for preparing the same may include: preparing a Zn precursor solution by dissolving the Zn precursor in alcohol, and then heating the Zn precursor solution; [ ² ] preparing a [Zn (OH) ₄ ] ^2- containing solution; [ ₃ ] forming CeZnO metal oxide particles having a ZnO crystal structure doped with Ce ions by mixing and reducing the [Zn (OH) ₄ ] ^2- containing solution with Ce precursor aqueous solution; Recovering and washing the CeZnO metal oxide particles; And 5 steps of drying the washed CeZnO metal oxide particles. Thus, a radical scavenger for PEMFC may be prepared.

The temperature rising in the first step may be performed by slowly heating the Zn precursor solution to 40 ° C to 70 ° C, preferably 55 ° C to 70 ° C.

Zn precursors in the first stage are zinc acetate, zinc nitrate, zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, zinc bromide, zinc phosphate, and zinc iodide. (Zinc iodide), zinc cyanide, zinc methoxide (Zinc methoxide), zinc acrylate (Zinc acrylate), zinc fluoride (Zinc fluoride) and zinc phosphide (Zinc phosphide) And preferably, it may include one or more selected from zinc acetate, zinc nitrate and zinc sulfate.

The alcohol in the first step may include one or more selected from methanol, ethanol, propanol and butanol, and preferably methanol.

The Zn precursor solution of the first step may be used to dissolve the Zn precursor in an alcohol concentration of 0.01M ~ 5M, preferably 0.05M ~ 2M, wherein, if the Zn precursor concentration is less than 0.01M [Zn during synthesis (OH) 4] ^-2 may be difficult to convert, if exceeding 5M may be a problem that is difficult to dissolve in alcohol solvents.

Next, in step 2, the [Zn (OH) ₄ ] ² -containing solution is prepared by adding, stirring, and reacting an ionizing agent to a Zn precursor solution. When an ionizing agent is added to a Zn precursor solution, ZnO is formed and an ionizing agent. As the pH is increased, ZnO is changed to [Zn (OH) ₄ ] ^2- as the pH is increased, and the mixed solution is changed to a transparent color.

When the ionizing agent is added, the Zn precursor solution is preferably 40 ° C. to 70 ° C., preferably 55 ° C. to 65 ° C., where the Zn precursor solution is not formed as [Zn (OH) ₄ ] ^2- when it is less than 40 ° C. There may be a problem that only a very small amount is generated, and if the solvent is more than 70 ℃ boiling problem, it is good to add, agitate and react the ionizer to the Zn precursor solution having the above temperature.

The amount of the ionizer added is not particularly limited, but the pH of the mixed solution of the Zn precursor solution and the ionizer is 6-14, preferably pH 8-12, more preferably pH 8-10. It is better to mix and react by dropwise addition of an ionizing agent until it depends on the Zn ion content in the Zn precursor solution. However, when the Zn ion content is low, the mixed solution turns into a transparent color from pH 6 or higher.

The ionizing agent is a basic solution, and includes a solution dissolved in a lower alcohol at a concentration of 0.05M to 5M hydroxide, preferably at a concentration of 0.5M to 2M. At this time, if the hydroxide concentration is less than 0.05M may be difficult to convert to [Zn (OH) ₄ ] ^-2 during synthesis, if it exceeds 5M may not be dissolved in alcohol solvents, the hydroxide at the above concentration It is good to use the one dissolved in alcohol.

And, the hydroxide is KOH, NaOH, Ca (OH) ₂ , It may include one or more selected from Ba (OH) ₂ , Mg (OH) ₂ , NaHCO ₃ , Al (OH) ₃ and NH ₃ , preferably one of KOH, NaOH, and Ca (OH) ₂ The above may more preferably contain KOH.

In addition, the lower alcohol used in the preparation of the ionizer may include one or more selected from methanol, ethanol, propanol and butanol, preferably the same as the alcohol used to prepare the Zn precursor solution in one step More preferably, methanol can be used.

Next, step 3 is performed by mixing and reducing the [Zn (OH) ₄ ] ² -containing solution and the Ce precursor aqueous solution at a volume ratio of 1: 0.1 to 10, preferably at a volume ratio of 1: 0.5 to 2, thereby performing cerium ions. It is a process of forming CeZnO metal oxide particles having a doped ZnO crystal structure. At this time, when the amount of the Ce precursor solution is less than 1: 0.1 by volume ratio, there may be a problem that the radical removal effect of the CeZnO metal oxide particles prepared by having less Ce content in the CeZnO metal oxide particles, which is the reaction product, is lowered, that is, the antioxidant effect is reduced. When the amount of the solution used exceeds 1:10 by volume, Ce content in the CeZnO metal oxide particles, which is a reaction product, may be too high, resulting in poor dispersion stability in the electrolyte, resulting in precipitation. [Zn (OH) _4] ^2-containing solution by mixing the precursor solution and Ce [Zn (OH) _4] there is ² is converted into ZnO, In this case, Ce ions dissolved in water (Ce ^{+ 3} and / or Ce ^{4 +)} is mixed with some of the ZnO particles, OH ^- ions are because Ce ^{3 +} and / or pulling the Ce ^{+ 4} are mixed only cation.

The Ce precursor aqueous solution includes an aqueous solution in which a cerium precursor is dissolved in water, preferably DI-water, in an amount of 0.01M to 5M, preferably 0.05M to 2M. In this case, when the cerium precursor concentration is less than 0.05M, there may be a problem that the radical removal effect, that is, the antioxidant effect of the CeZnO metal oxide particles produced by having less Ce content in the CeZnO metal oxide particles is lowered, and when the cerium precursor concentration exceeds 5M. Ce content in the CeZnO metal oxide particles as a reaction product is too high, there is a problem that the precipitate is generated because the dispersion stability in the electrolyte is poor.

The cerium precursor is cerium nitrate hexahydrate, cerium (IV) hydroxide, cerium (III) bromide, cerium (III) oxalate, cerium (IV) sulfate, cerium (III) chloride, cerium iodide (Cerium (III) iodide), cerium (III) fluoride, cerium (III) acetylacetonate and cerium ammonium nitrate ( Ammonium cerium (IV) nitrate) may include one or more selected from, preferably, may include one or more selected from cerium nitrate, cerium sulfate and cerium chloride.

In the third step, it is preferable to perform a mixing and reduction reaction of the [Zn (OH) ₄ ] ² -containing solution and the Ce precursor aqueous solution at 0 ° C. to 70 ° C., preferably at 40 ° C. to 65 ° C. Is less than 0 ° C, the substitution reaction of Zn atoms into Ce atoms in the crystal structure by Ce ion doping may be difficult. If the temperature exceeds 70 ° C, the alcohol part of [Zn (OH) ₄ ] ^2- Since there may be a problem that the reaction is uneven while evaporating, it is preferable to perform the mixing and reaction under the above temperature range.

Next, the fourth step is to recover the CeZnO metal oxide particles in the reaction product of step 3, and then wash them to improve the radical scavenger which is the final CeZnO metal oxide particles, and the recovery is a general method used in the art. It may be carried out through, for example, by filtering it can recover the reaction product CeZnO metal oxide particles from the reaction solution. In addition, the washing may be performed by a general method used in the art, and is not particularly limited.

In addition, the drying in five steps may be performed through a general method used in the art, and for example, the washed CeZnO metal oxide particles may be subjected to 20 to 20 ° C. under 90 ° C. to 120 ° C., preferably 95 ° C. to 110 ° C. Heat drying can be performed for about 36 hours.

In addition, in order to increase the crystallinity of the heat-dried metal oxide particles, the step of firing may optionally be further performed. For example, the firing may be carried out at 1,500 ° C. or lower, preferably 1,000 ° C. to 1,450 ° C. Can be done.

[ PTFE  Porous support]

Next, the support layer, which is one of the structures of the composite electrolyte membrane of the present invention, may use a general porous support used in the art, and preferably, a PTFE porous support having specific properties prepared by the following manufacturing method may be used. .

The PTFE porous support is a 1-1 step of preparing a paste by mixing and stirring the PTFE powder and lubricant; 1-2 steps of aging the paste; 1-3 to produce an unbaked tape by extruding and rolling the aged paste; 1 to 4 steps of drying the unbaked tape and removing the liquid lubricant; 1-5 steps of uniaxially stretching the unbaked tape from which the lubricant is removed; 1-6 steps of biaxially stretching the uniaxially stretched unbaked tape; And it may be prepared by performing a process comprising; 1-7 step of firing.

In step 1-1, the paste may include 15 to 35 parts by weight of lubricant, preferably 15 to 30 parts by weight, and more preferably 15 to 25 parts by weight, based on 100 parts by weight of PTFE powder. When the lubricant is less than 15 parts by weight based on 100 parts by weight of the PTFE fine powder, the porosity may be lowered when forming the PTFE porous support by the biaxial stretching process described below, and when the amount exceeds 35 parts by weight, the pore size when forming the PTFE porous support. May increase and the strength of the support may be weakened.

The average particle diameter of the PTFE powder is 300㎛ ~ 800㎛. Preferably, it may be 450 μm to 700 μm, but is not limited thereto. The lubricant may be a liquid lubricant, and in addition to hydrocarbon oils such as liquid paraffin, naphtha, white oil, toluene, and xylene, various alcohols, ketones, esters, and the like may be used, and preferably selected from liquid paraffin, naphtha, and white oil. 1 or more types can be used.

Next, the aging step 1-2 is a preforming process, the paste may be aged for 12 to 24 hours at a temperature of 30 ℃ to 70 ℃, preferably 16 to 20 at a temperature of 35 ℃ to 60 ℃ May age for time. If the aging temperature is less than 35 ℃ or the aging time is less than 12 hours, the coating of the lubricant on the PTFE powder surface becomes uneven, the stretching uniformity of the PTFE sheet during biaxial stretching described below may be limited. In addition, when the aging temperature exceeds 70 ℃ or the aging time exceeds 24 hours, there may be a problem that the support pore size after the biaxial stretching process is too small due to the evaporation of the lubricant.

Next, the extrusion of the 1-3 steps to prepare the PTFE block by compressing the aged paste in a compressor, the PTFE block at a pressure of 0.069 ~ 0.200 Ton / cm ² , preferably 0.090 ~ 0.175 Ton / cm ² It can be carried out by pressure extrusion at a pressure of. At this time, the pressure extrusion pressure is 0.069 Ton / cm ² If less than the pore size of the support may be large, the strength of the support may be weakened, if it exceeds 0.200 Ton / cm ² there may be a problem that the support pore size after the biaxial stretching process is reduced.

And, the rolling of step 1-3 may be carried out in a calendering process under 50 ~ 100 ℃ with a hydraulic pressure of 5 ~ 10MPa. In this case, when the hydraulic pressure is less than 5MPa, the pore size of the support may increase, so that the strength of the support may be weakened, and when the hydraulic pressure exceeds 10MPa, the support pore size may be reduced.

Next, the drying in 1-4 steps can be carried out through a general drying method used in the art, for example, the unbaked tape prepared by rolling at a temperature of 100 ℃ ~ 200 ℃ 1 ~ 5M / min It can be carried out while transferring to the conveyor belt at a speed, preferably at a speed of 2 ~ 4M / min at 140 ℃ ~ 190 ℃ temperature. In this case, when the drying temperature is less than 100 ℃ or the drying rate exceeds 5M / min, bubbles may occur during the stretching process due to the non-evaporation of the lubricant, the drying temperature is 200 ℃ or more or 1M / If less than min, the stiffness of the dried tape may increase, causing slip during the stretching process.

Next, uniaxial stretching in steps 1-5 is a process of stretching the unbaked tape from which the lubricant is removed in the longitudinal direction, and performing uniaxial stretching using the speed difference between the rollers when transferring through the rollers. The uniaxial stretching is performed by stretching the unbaked tape from which the lubricant is removed at a length of 3 to 10 times, preferably at 6 to 9.5 times, more preferably at 6.2 to 9 times, and even more preferably at 6.3 to 8.2 times. It is good to do. In this case, if the uniaxial draw ratio is less than three times, sufficient mechanical properties cannot be secured. If the uniaxial draw ratio exceeds 10 times, the mechanical properties may be rather reduced, and the pores of the support may be too large.

And, uniaxial stretching is carried out at a stretching temperature of 260 ℃ to 350 ℃ and a stretching speed of 6 to 12 M / min, preferably a stretching temperature of 270 ℃ to 330 ℃ and a stretching speed of 8 ~ 11.5 M / min, If the stretching temperature is less than 260 ℃ or the stretching speed is less than 6 M / min at the time of uniaxial stretching, there is a problem that there is a problem that the plastic section is generated due to the heat load on the drying sheet, the stretching temperature during uniaxial stretching When the temperature exceeds 350 ° C. or the stretching speed exceeds 12 M / min, slip may occur during the uniaxial stretching process, resulting in a problem that thickness uniformity is lowered.

Next, the biaxial stretching of steps 1-6 is performed in the width direction (direction perpendicular to the uniaxial stretching) of the unaxially stretched unbaked tape, and is stretched by extending the width in the transverse direction while the end is fixed. can do. However, the present invention is not limited thereto, and the stretching may be performed according to a stretching method commonly used in the art. In the present invention, the biaxial stretching may be performed in the width direction of 15 to 50 times, preferably 25 to 45 times, more 28 to 45 times, more preferably 29 to 42 times, At this time, if the biaxial draw ratio is 15 times or less, sufficient mechanical properties may not be secured. If the biaxial draw ratio is more than 50 times, the mechanical properties may not be improved even if it exceeds 50 times, and there may be a problem in that the uniformity of the properties in the longitudinal direction and / or the width direction is lowered. Since it is possible to perform the stretching within the above range.

And, biaxial stretching is carried out at a stretching speed of 10 to 20 M / min under a stretching temperature of 150 ℃ ~ 260 ℃, preferably under a stretching speed of 11 ~ 18 M / min under a stretching temperature of 200 ℃ to 250 ℃ If the biaxial stretching temperature is less than 150 ℃ or the stretching speed is less than 10 M / min, there may be a problem that the stretching uniformity in the lateral direction is lowered, the biaxial stretching temperature exceeds 260 ℃, or If the stretching speed exceeds 20 M / min unbaked section may occur there may be a problem that the physical properties are lowered.

Next, firing in steps 1-7 is performed at 350 ° C. to 450 ° C., while moving the stretched porous support at a speed of 10 to 18 M / min, preferably at a speed of 13 to 17 M / min, on the conveyor belt. Preferably, a temperature of 380 ° C. to 440 ° C., more preferably 400 ° C. to 435 ° C., may be performed by adding a temperature, thereby fixing the draw ratio and improving the strength. When firing, the strength of the porous support may be lowered if the firing temperature is less than 350 ° C., and if the temperature exceeds 450 ° C., the physical properties of the support may be deteriorated due to a decrease in the number of fibrils due to overfiring.

The PTFE porous support prepared by performing the steps 1-7 has a draw ratio (or aspect ratio) in the uniaxial direction (length direction) and biaxial direction (width direction) of 1: 3.00 to 8.5, preferably 1: 4.0 to 7.0. , More preferably 1: 4.00 to 5.50, and even more preferably 1: 4.20 to 5.00, and the uniaxial and biaxial stretching ratios (or aspect ratios) are in the above ranges. It is preferable to secure proper pore size and secure proper current flow.

The prepared porous support may have an average pore size of 0.080 μm to 0.200 μm, preferably 0.090 μm to 0.180 μm, more preferably 0.095 μm to 0.150 μm, and even more preferably 0.100 to 0.140 μm. In addition, the porous support of the present invention may have an average porosity of 60% to 90%, more preferably 60% to 79.6%.

In this case, when the average pore size of the porous support is less than 0.080 μm or the porosity is less than 60%, when the electrolyte is impregnated to prepare the electrolyte membrane using the support, the degree of impregnation of the electrolyte in the support may be limited. In addition, when the average pore size exceeds 0.200 μm or the porosity exceeds 90%, the porous support structure may be deformed when the electrolyte is impregnated, and there may be a problem in that product life may be reduced due to deterioration of dimensional stability.

The PTFE porous support prepared by the above method may have an average thickness of 5 μm to 25 μm, preferably an average thickness of 5 μm to 20 μm, and more preferably 10 μm to 20 μm.

In the PTFE porous support, the uniaxial modulus and biaxial modulus values satisfy the following Equation 4 when measured according to ASTM D 882.

[Equation 4]

0 ≤ │ (uniaxial modulus-biaxial modulus) / (uniaxial modulus) x 100% │ ≤ 54%, preferably 0 ≤ │ (uniaxial modulus-biaxial modulus) Direction modulus) × 100% │ ≦ 40%, more preferably 1 ≦ │ (uniaxial modulus-biaxial modulus) / (uniaxial modulus) × 100% │ ≦ 26%

The porous support of the present invention may have a uniaxial (length) modulus of 40 MPa or more, preferably uniaxial modulus of 50 MPa or more, as measured according to ASTM D 882. Preferably the uniaxial modulus may be between 48 and 75 Mpa, even more preferably between 65 and 75 Mpa. Further, the biaxial direction (width direction) modulus is 40 MPa or more, preferably the biaxial direction (width direction) modulus is 55 Mpa or more, more preferably 46 to 75 Mpa, even more preferably 55 to 75 Mpa Can be.

In addition, the porous support of the present invention, when measured according to ASTM D882, the uniaxial direction (length direction) tensile strength of 40 MPa or more and the biaxial direction (width direction) tensile strength of 40 MPa or more, preferably 1 The axial tensile strength may be 50 MPa or more, more preferably, the uniaxial tensile strength may be 54 to 65 Mpa. In addition, the biaxial tensile strength is preferably 52 Mpa or more, more preferably the biaxial tensile strength may be 52 to 70 Mpa.

Prepared by the above-described method, the porous support of the present invention having excellent mechanical properties is a step 1-8 of impregnating the porous support prepared by firing in step 1-7 in the fluorine ionomer solution; And 1-9 to dry and heat-treat the impregnated PTFE porous support.

The fluorine ionomer solution of steps 1-8 may further include hollow silica, thereby improving moisture absorption of the fluorine ionomer solution of the support and preventing volume expansion of the PTFE porous support by impregnation of the fluorine ionomer solution. have.

The fluorine-based ionomer may include at least one selected from Nafion, Flemion, and Aciplex, and more preferably Nafion.

The hollow silica is spherical, the average particle diameter may be 10 ~ 300 nm, more preferably 10 ~ 100 nm. Here, the particle diameter means the diameter when the shape of the hollow silica is spherical, and the maximum distance of the linear distance from one point to the other on the hollow silica surface when the shape is not spherical. When the average particle diameter of the hollow silica is less than 10 nm, as the capacity for supporting the fluorine ionomer solution decreases, the absorption capacity of the fluorine ionomer solution may be limited, and when the average diameter exceeds 300 nm, the PTFE porous support The amount of the hollow silica impregnated in the pores may be limited.

The hollow part included in the hollow silica may be a space in which the fluorine-based ionomer solution adsorbed and moved through the shell part may be supported. Preferably, the hollow diameter may be 5 to 100 nm, and more preferably 5 to 50 nm. . If the hollow diameter is less than 5 nm, the amount of the fluorine-based ionomer solution supported may be reduced. If the hollow diameter exceeds 100 nm, the particle size of the hollow silica may be larger than the desired range or may cause the shell to collapse. The hollow silica may include 0.05 to 5 parts by weight, and more preferably 1 to 3 parts by weight, based on 100 parts by weight of the fluorine-based ionomer solution. If less than 0.05 part by weight of hollow silica is included with respect to 100 parts by weight of the fluorine-based ionomer solution, the impregnating effect of the fluorine-based ionomer solution may be insignificant. The flow of current can be lowered when applied to an electrode assembly.

In addition, the fluorine-based ionomer solution may further include one or more moisture absorbents selected from zeolite, titania, zirconia and montmorillonite.

The drying of steps 1-9 may be performed for 1 to 30 minutes at 60 ℃ ~ 100 ℃ temperature, heat treatment may be performed for 1 to 5 minutes at 100 ℃ ~ 200 ℃ temperature. When the temperature of the drying process is less than 60 ℃ the liquid-retaining property of the fluorine-based ionomer solution impregnated in the porous support may be lowered, if it exceeds 100 ℃, in the preparation of the electrolyte membrane, the production of the electrolyte membrane and / or membrane-electrode assembly Adhesion with the electrode may be lowered. In addition, when the heat treatment temperature is less than 100 ℃ or less than 1 minute in the heat treatment process, the liquid retention of the fluorine-based ionomer solution impregnated in the porous support may be lowered, the temperature exceeds 200 ℃ or the heat treatment time is 5 minutes When exceeded, adhesion of the support to the electrolyte membrane may reduce the adhesion with the electrolyte membrane.

The heat-treated porous support of step 9 may have a volume of the occluded pores greater than 90% by volume relative to the total pore volume.

The PEMFC composite electrolyte membrane of the present invention may have a weight variation coefficient (CV1) value of relation 1 below 40%, preferably 45 to 300%, more preferably 60% to 140%.

[Relationship 1]

Weight variation coefficient (CV1,%) = │ (porous support thickness after electrolyte treatment-porous support weight before electrolyte treatment) / (porous support weight before electrolyte treatment) │ 100

The weight variation coefficient is one of the indicators for measuring the weight change due to the electrolyte membrane being coated on the surface of the porous support and impregnated in the pores of the porous support before and after the impregnation of the fluorine-based ionomer solution as the electrolyte on the porous support. As the number increases, the impregnation amount of the fluorine ionomer impregnated in the porous support increases.

As described above, the composite electrolyte membrane according to the present invention satisfies the weight variation coefficient of 40% or more, so that the impregnated amount of the electrolyte impregnated in the porous support is large, and the electrolyte membrane for fuel cell according to the present invention has a low volume shrinkage. The electrolyte impregnation amount is high.

In addition, the PEMFC fuel cell electrolyte membrane of the present invention prepared using the PEMFC porous support has an effect of increasing tensile strength and modulus, and the fuel cell electrolyte membrane of the present invention has a uniaxial direction (length direction) when measured according to ASTM D 882 The modulus may be 50 MPa or more, preferably the uniaxial modulus may be 55 MPa or more, and more preferably the uniaxial modulus may be 55 to 100 MPa. Further, the biaxial direction (width direction) modulus may be 50 MPa or more, preferably the biaxial direction (width direction) modulus may be 53 Mpa or more, and more preferably 55 to 90 Mpa.

In addition, the PEMFC fuel cell electrolyte membrane of the present invention may be 45 MPa or more in biaxial direction (length direction) and 45 MPa or more in biaxial direction (length direction) when measured according to ASTM D882, preferably Preferably, the uniaxial tensile strength may be 55 MPa or more, more preferably, the uniaxial tensile strength may be 56 to 90 MPa. In addition, the biaxial tensile strength is preferably 50 to 85 Mpa, more preferably the biaxial tensile strength may be 50 to 78 Mpa.

In addition, the PEMFC fuel cell electrolyte membrane of the present invention has a simplified structure compared to the conventional fuel cell electrolyte membrane, and can improve interface characteristics when bonded to the electrode. In addition, the thickness of the support can be designed to be thin, and as the thickness of the electrolyte membrane becomes thin, the hydrogen ion transfer delay can be prevented and the performance of the fuel cell can be improved.

In the membrane-electrode assembly according to the embodiment of the present invention, the composite electrolyte membrane 10 for PEMFC described above is prepared, as shown in the cross-sectional view of FIG. 8, and the catalyst layers 22 are formed on both surfaces of the electrolyte membrane for fuel cells. , 22 '), gas diffusion layers 21, 21'? It may be prepared by performing a process including the step of bonding the electrode including the electrode substrate (23, 23 ').

Referring to FIG. 8, the membrane-electrode assembly according to the exemplary embodiment of the present invention has an anode (anode, anode, 20) and a cathode (cathode), which face each other with the fuel cell electrolyte membrane 10 interposed therebetween. Electrode 20 '). In this case, the anode 20 and the cathode 20 'include gas diffusion layers 21 and 21', catalyst layers 22 and 22 ', and electrode substrates 23 and 23', respectively.

The anode 20 may include a gas diffusion layer 21 and an oxidation catalyst layer 22. The gas diffusion layer 21 may be provided to prevent rapid diffusion of fuel injected into the fuel cell and to prevent a decrease in ion conductivity. The gas diffusion layer 21 may control the diffusion rate of the fuel through heat treatment or electrochemical treatment. The gas diffusion layer 21 may be carbon fiber or carbon paper. Here, the fuel may be a liquid fuel such as formic acid solution, methanol, formaldehyde, or ethanol.

The oxidation catalyst layer 22 is a layer into which the catalyst is introduced, and may include a conductive support and an ion conductive binder (not shown). In addition, the oxidation catalyst layer 22 may include a main catalyst attached to the conductive support. The conductive support may be carbon black and the ion conductive binder may be a Nafion ionomer or a sulfonated polymer. In addition, the main catalyst may be a metal catalyst, for example, may be platinum (Pt).

The oxidation catalyst layer 22 may be formed using an electroplating method, a spray method, a painting method, a doctor blade method, or a transfer method.

The cathode 20 ′ may include a gas diffusion layer 21 ′ and a reduction catalyst layer 22 ′. The gas diffusion layer 21 ′ may be provided to prevent sudden diffusion of the gas injected into the reduction electrode 20 ′ and to uniformly disperse the gas injected into the reduction electrode 20 ′. The gas diffusion layer 21 may be carbon paper or carbon fiber.

The reduction catalyst layer 22 ′ is a layer into which the catalyst is introduced, and may include a conductive support and an ion conductive binder (not shown). In addition, the reduction catalyst layer 22 ′ may include a main catalyst attached to the conductive support. The conductive support may be carbon black and the ion conductive binder may be a Nafion ionomer or a sulfonated polymer. In addition, the main catalyst may be a metal catalyst, for example, may be platinum (Pt).

The reduction catalyst layer 22 ′ may be formed using an electroplating method, a spray method, a painting method, a doctor blade method, or a transfer method.

The membrane-electrode assembly may be formed by placing and then fastening each of the anode electrode 20, the composite electrolyte membrane for fuel cell 10, and the cathode 20 ′, or may be formed by pressing them at high temperature and high pressure.

Bonding the electrodes 20, 20 ′ to both surfaces of the PEMFC composite electrolyte membrane 10 may first apply a gas diffusion layer forming material to one surface of the fuel cell electrolyte membrane 10 to form a gas diffusion layer 21, 21. Forming a ').

The gas diffusion layers 21 and 21 ′ serve as current conductors between the PEMFC composite electrolyte membrane 10 and the catalyst layers 22 and 22 ′, and serve as passages of reactant gases and water as products. Therefore, the gas diffusion layers 21 and 21 ′ may have a porous structure having a porosity of 20% to 90% to allow gas to pass therethrough. The thicknesses of the gas diffusion layers 21 and 21 'may be appropriately adopted as necessary, and may be, for example, 100 to 400 µm. When the thickness of the gas diffusion layers 21 and 21 ′ is 100 μm or less, the electrical contact resistance increases between the catalyst layer and the electrode substrate, and the structure may become unstable by compression. In addition, when the thickness of the gas diffusion layers 21 and 21 'exceeds 400 μm, it may be difficult to move the reactant gas.

The gas diffusion layers 21 and 21 ′ may be formed of a carbonaceous material and a fluorine resin. Carbonaceous materials include graphite, carbon black, acetylene black, denka black, kecheon black, activated carbon, mesoporous carbon, carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibers, carbon nanohorns, carbon nanorings, carbon nanowires, and fullerenes (C60). And super P may include one or more selected from the group consisting of, but is not limited thereto. As the fluorine resin, polytetrafluoroethylene, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVdF), polyvinyl alcohol, cellulose acetate, a copolymer of polyvinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene, or styrene-butadiene high portion (SBR) It may include one or more selected from the group consisting of.

Next, catalyst layers 22 and 22 'are formed on the gas diffusion layers 21 and 21'.

The catalyst layers 22 and 22 'may be formed by applying a catalyst layer forming material on the gas diffusion layers 21 and 21'.

The catalyst layer forming material may be a metal catalyst or a metal catalyst supported on a carbon-based support. As the metal catalyst, at least one selected from the group consisting of platinum, ruthenium, platinum-ruthenium alloy, platinum-osmium alloy, platinum-palladium alloy, and platinum-transition metal alloy may be used. In addition, the carbon-based support is graphite (graphite), carbon black, acetylene black, denka black, kecheon black, activated carbon, mesoporous carbon, carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibers, carbon nanohorn, carbon nano ring, carbon nano And at least one selected from the group consisting of wire, fullerene, and superP.

The electrode substrates 23 and 23 'may be a conductive substrate selected from the group consisting of carbon paper, carbon cloth, and carbon felt, but are not limited thereto, and may be a cathode electrode material applicable to a polymer electrolyte fuel cell, or Both anode electrode materials can be used. The electrode substrate may be formed through a conventional deposition method, and after forming the catalyst layers 22 and 22 'on the electrode substrates 23 and 23', the catalyst layers on the gas diffusion layers 21 and 21 'are formed. 22 and 22 'and the gas diffusion layers 21 and 21' may be disposed to be in contact with each other.

Hereinafter, preferred examples will be presented to aid in understanding the present invention. However, the following examples are only for the understanding of the present invention, and the present invention is not limited to the following experimental examples.

[ EXAMPLE ]

Preparation  1-1: PTFE  Preparation of Porous Support

A paste was prepared by mixing, stirring and uniformly dispersing 23 parts by weight of naphtha, which is a liquid lubricant, with respect to 100 parts by weight of PTFE fine powder having an average particle diameter of 570 μm.

Next, the paste was left at 50 ° C. for 18 hours to mature and then compressed using a molding jig to prepare a PTFE block.

Next, the PTFE block was put into an extrusion mold, and then subjected to pressure extrusion under a pressure of about 0.10 Ton / cm ² .

Next, it rolled using the rolling roll and manufactured the unbaked tape of average thickness 850 micrometers.

Next, the unbaked tape was transferred to a conveyor belt at a rate of 3 M / min and dried by applying heat at 180 ° C. to remove the lubricant.

Next, the unbaked tape from which the lubricant was removed was subjected to uniaxial stretching (length stretching) at 6.5 times under the stretching temperature of 280 ° C. and the stretching speed of 10 M / min.

Next, the biaxially stretched (uniaxially stretched) was performed 30 times under the stretching temperature of 250 ° C. and the stretching speed of 10 M / min under the uniaxially stretched unbaked tape to prepare a porous support.

Next, the uniaxial and biaxially stretched porous supports were calcined by applying a temperature of 420 ° C. at a rate of 15 M / min on a conveyor belt to prepare a PTFE porous support having an average thickness of 14 μm and an average pore size of 0.114 μm.

Preparation  1-2 ~ Preparation  1-3 and Comparative Preparation  1-1 to Comparative Preparation  1-2

In the same manner as in Preparation Example 1-1, except that the porous support prepared by uniaxial and biaxial stretching in Example 1 to prepare a PTFE porous support by varying the firing temperature as shown in Table 1 below, Preparation Example 1 -2 to 1-3 and Comparative Preparation Examples 1-1 to 1-2 were carried out, respectively.

Preparation  1-4 ~ Preparation  1-6 and Comparative Preparation  1-3 ~ Comparative Preparation  1-6

In the same manner as in Preparation Example 1-1, but by varying the temperature at the time of uniaxial stretching or biaxial stretching as shown in Table 1 to prepare a PTFE porous support, respectively, Preparation Examples 1-4 to 1-6 And Comparative Preparation Examples 1-3 to 1-6 were performed, respectively.

Preparation  1-7 ~ Preparation  1-10 and Comparative Preparation  1-7 ~ Comparative Preparation  1-10

The preparation was carried out in the same manner as in Preparation Example 1-1, by preparing a PTFE porous support by varying the stretching speed during uniaxial stretching or the stretching speed for biaxial stretching, respectively, as shown in Table 1 below, Preparation Examples 1-7 to 1 -10 and Comparative Preparation Examples 1-7 to 1-10 were carried out, respectively.

Preparation  1-11 ~ Preparation  1-14 and Comparative Preparation  1-11 ~ Comparative Preparation  1-15

A PTFE porous support was prepared in the same manner as in Preparation Example 1-1, but uniaxial and biaxial stretching were performed under the same conditions as in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.

division Firing
Temperature
(℃) Single axis stretching temperature
(℃) 2-axis stretching temperature
(℃) Single axis stretching speed
(M / min) 2-axis stretching speed
(M / min) Single axis draw ratio
(Length direction) 2-axis draw ratio
(Width direction) 1-axis and 2-axis draw ratio
(Support stretch aspect ratio) Support
Average
thickness
(Μm) Preparation Example 1-1 420 280 250 10 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 14 μm Preparation Example 1-2 440 280 250 10 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 12㎛ Preparation Example 1-3 380 280 250 10 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 17 μm Preparation Example 1-4 420 260 250 10 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 16 μm Preparation Example 1-5 420 330 250 10 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 13 μm Preparation Example 1-6 420 280 260 10 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 14 μm Preparation Example 1-7 420 280 250 8 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 14 μm Preparation Example 1-8 420 280 250 11.5 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 14 μm Preparation Example 1-9 420 280 250 10 15 6.5 30 1: 4.62 16 μm Preparation Example 1-10 420 280 250 10 18 6.5 30 1: 4.62 16 μm Preparation Example 1-11 420 280 250 10 10 7 30 1: 4.29 12㎛ Preparation Example 1-12 420 280 250 10 10 8 36 1: 4.50 10 μm Preparation Example 1-13 420 280 250 10 10 8 32 1: 4.00 11㎛ Preparation Example 1-14 420 280 250 10 10 6.5 45 1: 6.92 10 μm

division Firing
Temperature
(℃) Single axis stretching temperature
(℃) 2-axis stretching temperature
(℃) Single axis stretching speed
(M / min) 2-axis stretching speed
(M / min) Single axis draw ratio
(Length direction) 2-axis draw ratio
(Width direction) 1-axis and 2-axis draw ratio
(Support stretch aspect ratio) Support
Average
thickness
(Μm) Comparative Preparation Example 1-1 335 280 250 10 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 18㎛ Comparative Preparation Example 1-2 460 280 250 10 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 9㎛ Comparative Preparation Example 1-3 420 240 250 10 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 15 μm Comparative Preparation Example 1-4 420 365 250 10 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 11㎛ Comparative Preparation Example 1-5 420 280 140 10 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 17 μm Comparative Preparation Example 1-6 420 280 290 10 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 13 μm Comparative Preparation Example 1-7 420 280 250 5.5 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 12㎛ Comparative Preparation Example 1-8 420 280 250 14 10 6.5 30 1: 4.62 18㎛ Comparative Preparation Example 1-9 420 280 250 10 8 6.5 30 1: 4.62 11㎛ Comparative Preparation Example 1-10 420 280 250 10 22 6.5 30 1: 4.62 18㎛ Comparative Preparation Example 1-11 420 280 250 10 10 2.5 18 1: 7.20 27 ㎛ Comparative Preparation Example 1-12 420 280 250 10 10 2.5 20 1: 8.00 24㎛ Comparative Preparation Example 1-13 420 280 250 10 10 8 22 1: 2.75 16 μm Comparative Preparation Example 1-14 420 280 250 10 10 6.5 14 1: 2.15 25 μm Comparative Preparation Example 1-15 420 280 250 10 10 6.5 51 1: 7.85 7㎛

Experimental Example  One : PTFE  Mechanical Properties of Porous Supports

After measuring the average pore size, porosity, tensile strength and modulus of each of the porous supports prepared in Preparation Examples and Comparative Preparation Examples, the results are shown in Tables 3 and 4.

The average pore size and porosity were measured according to ASTM F316-03, the pressure was 0 ~ 70 psi, the solvent used galwick (galwick), was measured by dry up / wet up method (capillary flow porometer, capillary flow using a porometer).

Tensile strength and modulus were measured according to ASTM D 882, and after the production of straight specimens (10 mm in width and 100 mm in length), a universal tester was used at a test speed of 500 mm / min and an initial grip distance of 500 mm. test machine).

division Average pore size (㎛) Porosity (%) Preparation Example 1-1 0.124 71.0 Preparation Example 1-2 0.152 78.7 Preparation Example 1-3 0.093 62.3 Preparation Example 1-4 0.117 69.7 Preparation Example 1-5 0.144 76.5 Preparation Example 1-6 0.131 72.1 Preparation Example 1-7 0.147 77.0 Preparation Example 1-8 0.115 68.8 Preparation Example 1-9 0.098 65.1 Preparation Example 1-10 0.083 61.2 Preparation Example 1-11 0.143 76.3 Preparation Example 1-12 0.155 79.6 Preparation Example 1-13 0.143 76.0 Preparation Example 1-14 0.153 77.7 Comparative Preparation Example 1-1 0.073 55.2 Comparative Preparation Example 1-2 0.260 90.4 Comparative Preparation Example 1-3 0.077 57.4 Comparative Preparation Example 1-4 0.215 87.2 Comparative Preparation Example 1-5 0.069 51.5 Comparative Preparation Example 1-6 0.233 88.0 Comparative Preparation Example 1-7 0.216 86.9 Comparative Preparation Example 1-8 0.073 53.1 Comparative Preparation Example 1-9 0.209 87.0 Comparative Preparation Example 1-10 0.077 52.9 Comparative Preparation Example 1-11 0.183 81.3 Comparative Preparation Example 1-12 0.196 84.2 Comparative Preparation Example 1-13 0.163 80.5 Comparative Preparation Example 1-14 0.165 81.7 Comparative Preparation Example 1-15 0.213 90.5

division Tensile Strength (Mpa) Modulus (Mpa) Difference between single and two axis modulus values (%) ⁽¹⁾ 1 axis
(Length direction) 2-axis
(Width direction) 1 axis
(Length direction) 2-axis
(Width direction) Preparation Example 1-1 51 52 50 53 6.00% Preparation Example 1-2 48 50 51 49 3.92% Preparation Example 1-3 64 68 66 65 1.52% Preparation Example 1-4 58 54 60 59 1.67% Preparation Example 1-5 47 44 50 46 8.00% Preparation Example 1-6 53 50 50 53 6.00% Preparation Example 1-7 47 46 48 50 4.17% Preparation Example 1-8 54 58 53 55 3.77% Preparation Example 1-9 64 61 66 63 4.55% Preparation Example 1-10 68 63 68 65 4.41% Preparation Example 1-11 63 49 61 53 13.11% Preparation Example 1-12 62 57 60 55 8.33% Preparation Example 1-13 65 53 66 54 18.18% Preparation Example 1-14 47 63 50 61 22.00% Comparative Preparation Example 1-1 78 71 75 73 2.67% Comparative Preparation Example 1-2 41 37 39 41 5.13% Comparative Preparation Example 1-3 73 69 71 65 8.45% Comparative Preparation Example 1-4 47 45 45 41 8.89% Comparative Preparation Example 1-5 77 79 81 85 4.94% Comparative Preparation Example 1-6 42 46 41 46 12.20% Comparative Preparation Example 1-7 37 33 40 36 10.00% Comparative Preparation Example 1-8 69 74 71 77 8.45% Comparative Preparation Example 1-9 41 43 42 43 2.38% Comparative Preparation Example 1-10 66 70 67 69 2.99% Comparative Preparation Example 1-11 27 43 31 44 41.94% Comparative Preparation Example 1-12 22 47 28 45 60.71% Comparative Preparation Example 1-13 81 23 78 26 66.67% Comparative Preparation Example 1-14 53 27 51 32 37.25% Comparative Preparation Example 1-15 38 63 37 66 78.38% (1) Difference between the values of uniaxial and biaxial modulus = │ (uniaxial modulus-biaxial modulus) / (uniaxial modulus) ⅹ100% │

Referring to Table 3, prepared in Example 1 - 1 to 1 - 14 of the support has an average pore size of 0.08 ~ 0.20㎛, it was confirmed that it has a porosity of 60% to 80% range. On the contrary, for Comparative Preparation Examples 1 to 1, Comparative Preparation Examples 1 to 3, Comparative Preparation Examples 1 to 5, and Comparative Preparation Examples 1 to 8, the average pore size was less than 0.08 µm and the porosity was less than 60%. In addition, Comparative Preparation Examples 1 to 4, Comparative Preparation Examples 1 to 6, Comparative Preparation Examples 1 to 7, and Comparative Preparation Examples 1 to 9 and Comparative Preparation Examples 1 to 15 exceeded the average pore size of 0.20 µm. Referring to preparation example 1 - 1 to 1 - for 14, the tensile strength was a uniaxial and biaxial all over 40 Mpa, the modulus was still more than 40 Mpa both uniaxial and biaxial.

On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 1 to 2, the biaxial tensile strength and uniaxial modulus were lower than 40 Mpa, and in Comparative Preparation Examples 1 to 11, Comparative Preparation Examples 1 to 12, and Comparative Preparation Examples 1 to 15, The axial tensile strength and uniaxial modulus were low, below 40 Mpa.

In addition, in Comparative Examples 1 to 13 and Comparative Examples 1 to 14, biaxial tensile strength and biaxial modulus showed low results of less than 40 Mpa.

Experimental Example 2: electrolyte membrane  Tensile strength and Modulus  Measure

Aquivion ^™ electrolyte was applied to one surface of the PTFE porous support prepared in Preparation Example 1-1 using a film applicator, dried at 90 ° C. for 10 minutes, and the same on the opposite side of the porous support. After the electrolyte was applied, the membrane was dried at 90 ° C. for 10 minutes and heat-treated at 150 ° C. for 10 minutes to prepare a three-layered electrolyte membrane including a PTFE porous support layer.

In the same manner, using the porous supports of Preparation Example 1-5, Preparation Example 1-10, Preparation Example 1-15, Comparative Preparation Example 1-6, and Comparative Preparation Example 1-9, each containing a PTFE porous support layer 3 A layered electrolyte membrane was prepared.

In addition, using an existing PTFE porous support (2.5 times uniaxial draw ratio, 10 times biaxial draw ratio, manufacturer: SangAfron Tech), an electrolyte membrane having a three-layered cross-section structure was prepared as in FIG. 1.

In addition, the tensile strength and modulus of the prepared electrolyte membrane were measured based on ASTM D 882, and the results are shown in Table 5 below.

division The tensile strength Modulus 1 axis direction (MD direction, Mpa) 2-axis direction (TD direction, Mpa) 1 axis direction (MD direction, Mpa) 1 axis direction (MD direction, Mpa) Preparation Example 1-1 60 63 63 69 Preparation Example 1-5 58 51 57 55 Preparation Example 1-10 78 71 96 84 Conventional PTFE Porous Support 47 34 35 15 Comparative Preparation Example 1-6 46 49 45 48 Comparative Preparation Example 1-9 45 47 43 46

Looking at the measurement results of the physical properties of Table 5, in the case of the electrolyte membrane prepared using the existing PTFE porous support, compared to the embodiment, the results have a significantly lower mechanical properties. On the contrary, in the case of the electrolyte membrane prepared using the PTFE porous support of the present invention, the modulus tended to increase greatly. In addition, the weight variation coefficient exceeded 300% due to the high electrolyte impregnation in the porous support. 6 and Comparative Preparation Examples 1-9, it was confirmed that there is a problem that not only the tensile strength of the electrolyte membrane but also the modulus is greatly reduced compared to the Example, and the effect of increasing the mechanical properties by the preparation of the electrolyte membrane using the porous support is very high. Weak. In contrast, in Preparation Examples 1-1, Preparation Examples 1-5, and Preparation Examples 1-10, the tensile strength and modulus of the electrolyte membrane were increased as compared with the tensile strength and modulus of the porous support.

Preparation  2-1: PEMFC  Radical Scavenger  Produce

Zn precursor solution was prepared by completely dissolving zinc acetate in methanol (purity 99.5%) of 0.1 M. Separately, IOH was prepared by dissolving 1 M KOH in methanol. In addition, a Ce precursor solution in which cerium nitrate hexahydrate was dissolved in DI-water at 0.1 M was prepared.

Next, 200 ml of the Zn precursor solution was heated to 60 ° C., and then the ionizing agent was added dropwise to the heated Zn precursor solution until the pH was 10. When the dropping started, it turned white and from pH6 it gradually turned into a clear solution. Finally, the dropwise addition was terminated to prepare a [Zn (OH) ₄ ] ² -containing solution.

Next, at 60 ° C., the Ce precursor solution was mixed and stirred at a volume ratio of 1: 1 in a [Zn (OH) ₄ ] ² -containing solution to carry out a reduction reaction to form CeZnO metal oxide particles.

Next, the precipitate was precipitated by centrifugation to recover the CeZnO metal oxide particles, washed with distilled water, and then heat-dried at 100 ° C. for 24 hours to finally prepare a PEMFC radical scavenger as CeZnO metal oxide particles.

The prepared radical scavenger was SEM measured, and the measured image is shown in FIG. 3. Looking at Figure 3 it can be seen that it is composed of fine particles.

Preparation  2-2 ~ Preparation  2-8 and Comparative Preparation  2-1 to Comparative Preparation  2-5

The preparation was carried out in the same manner as in Preparation Example 2-1, but Preparation Examples 2-2 to 2-3 and Comparative Preparation Examples 2-1 to 2-2 changed the temperature of the Zn precursor solution when the ionizing agent was added dropwise. In addition, Preparation Examples 2-4 to 2-6 and Comparative Preparation Example 2-3 were carried out by varying the pH of the ionizer input termination. In addition, Preparation Examples 2-7 to 2-8 and Comparative Preparation Examples 2-4 to 2-5 were carried out differently from the volume ratios of the [Zn (OH) ₄ ] ² -containing solution and the Ce precursor solution as shown in Table 6 below. Scavenger was prepared.

division Zn precursor solution temperature Ionizing Agent Termination pH [Zn (OH) ₄ ] ^2- containing solution and Ce precursor solution volume ratio Preparation Example 2-1 60 ℃ pH 6 1: 1 Preparation Example 2-2 50 ℃ pH 6 1: 1 Preparation Example 2-3 70 ℃ pH 6 1: 1 Preparation Example 2-4 65 ℃ pH 8 1: 1 Preparation Example 2-5 65 ℃ pH 10 1: 1 Preparation Example 2-6 65 ℃ pH 12 1: 1 Preparation Example 2-7 65 ℃ pH 6 1: 0.5 Preparation Example 2-8 65 ℃ pH 6 1: 2 Comparative Preparation Example 2-1 35 ℃ pH 6 1: 1 Comparative Preparation Example 2-2 75 ℃ pH 6 1: 1 Comparative Preparation Example 2-3 65 ℃ pH 5.5 1: 1 Comparative Preparation Example 2-4 65 ℃ pH 6 1: 0.05 Comparative Preparation Example 2-5 65 ℃ pH 6 1:11

Experimental Example  2: EDS measurement

The radical scavenger prepared in Preparation Example and Comparative Preparation Example was measured, and a measurement graph for Preparation Example 2-1 is shown in FIG. 4, and other measurement results are shown in Table 7 below.

division Ce
(weight%) Zn
(weight%) O
(weight%) Preparation Example 2-1 13.47 wt% 82.80 wt% 3.73 wt% Preparation Example 2-2 13.76 weight% 83.25 wt% 2.99% by weight Preparation Example 2-3 13.86 wt% 83.15 wt% 2.99% by weight Preparation Example 2-4 51.34 wt% 46.31 wt% 2.35 wt% Preparation Example 2-5 70.20 wt% 27.29 wt% 2.51 wt% Preparation Example 2-6 89.11 wt% 8.57% by weight 2.32 wt% Preparation Example 2-7 4.39 wt% 88.09 wt% 7.52 wt% Preparation Example 2-8 90.45 wt% 7.67 wt% 1.88 wt% Comparative Preparation Example 2-1 0 wt% 81.8 wt% 18.2 wt% Comparative Preparation Example 2-2 11.01% by weight 85.23 weight% 3.76 wt% Comparative Preparation Example 2-3 0 wt% 78.5 wt% 21.5 wt% Comparative Preparation Example 2-4 1.06 wt% 86.8 wt% 12.14 wt% Comparative Preparation Example 2-5 88.64 wt% 10.63 wt% 0.73 wt%

Experimental Example  3: CeZnO  Measurement of particle size and dispersion stability of metal oxide particles

After preparing 10 ml of the CeZnO metal oxide particles prepared in Preparation Examples 2-1 to 2-8 before drying, the mixture was mixed in a Nafion solution so as to be 1% by weight, followed by DLS (Dynamic Light Scattering) method. The particle size (D50) of the synthesized CeZnO particles was measured using a nanoparticle size analyzer (manufacturer: Microtrac, trade name Nanotrac Wave), and the results are shown in Table 3 below. In addition, the CeO ₂ metal oxide particles (purchased from US Research Nanomaterials, Inc), which is used as an existing radical scavenger, were taken in the same manner before taking 10 ml of the sample before drying, and then mixed in a Nafion solution to 1% by weight, The particle size (D50) of the CeO ₂ metal oxide particles was measured using a nanoparticle size analyzer, and the results are shown in Table 8 below.

The particle size measurement data measured before and after mixing CeZnO metal oxide particles and CeO ₂ metal oxide particles of Preparation Example 2-2 with Nafion are shown in FIGS. 5A to 5B and 6A to 6B. At this time, Figure 5a is a particle size measurement result of Preparation Example 2-2 before mixing with Nafion, Figure 5b is a particle size measurement result of Preparation Example 2-2 after mixing with Nafion. 6A shows particle size measurement results of CeO ₂ metal oxide particles before mixing with Nafion, and FIG. 6B shows particle size measurement results of CeO ₂ metal oxide particles after mixing with Nafion.

In addition, in order to measure the dispersion stability of the CeZnO metal oxide particles and the CeO ₂ metal oxide particles in the electrolyte, the CeZnO metal oxides were mixed and stirred to be 1% by weight in the mixed solution with the Nafion solution, and then left to stand for 24 hours. It was confirmed whether the precipitate occurred, the results are shown in Table 8 and (a) ~ (d) of FIG.

division Particle size measurement result (D50) Sediment occurrence Before mixing with Nafion After mixing with Nafion Preparation Example 2-1 57 nm 48 nm X Preparation Example 2-2 90 nm 57 nm X Preparation Example 2-3 158 nm 121 nm X Preparation Example 2-4 88 nm 77 nm X Preparation Example 2-5 100 nm 89 nm X Preparation Example 2-6 141 nm 133 nm X Preparation Example 2-7 73 nm 34 nm X Preparation Example 2-8 122 nm 113 nm X CeO ₂ Metal Oxide Particles 90.6 nm 6,070 nm O

5A and 6B, it can be seen that both CeZnO metal oxide and CeO ₂ metal oxide of Preparation Example 2-2 are well dispersed in Nafion solution, but when comparing FIGS. 5B and 6B, While the acidity is well maintained, the CeO ₂ metal oxide of FIG. 6B has a large dispersibility and it can be seen that a precipitate begins to occur.

Experimental Example  4 : Fenton  Test( Fenton  test), ion conductivity measurement

Manufactured in Preparation Example 2-1 CeZnO metal oxide powder was added to DI-water to 1% by weight of the total weight, and then subjected to sonication for 24 hours to prepare a CeZnO metal oxide dispersion solution.

Next, the CeZnO metal oxide dispersion solution sonicated in Nafion solution was added to 1% by weight of the total weight of the mixed solution, followed by stirring for 5 hours to prepare a coating solution.

Next, the coating solution is coated on the glass substrate using a film applicator to form a coating film, and then dried at 80 ° C. for 1 hour and then heat treated at 150 ° C. for 1 hour to prepare a single layer having a thickness of 20 μm. It was.

Instead of Preparation Example 2-1, using a CeZnO metal oxide particles of Preparation Examples 2-2 to 2-8 and Comparative Preparation Examples 2-1 to 2-5, a single 20um thick film was prepared.

(1) Each of the CeZnO metal oxide powder-containing single membranes was decomposed by adding hydrogen peroxide to an aqueous solution of ferrous sulfate, and then immersed in an aqueous solution in which radicals were artificially generated. The results are shown in Table 4 below.

(2) The ion conductivity of the CeZnO metal oxide powder-containing single membrane was measured by impedance (quad-pole) and hydrogen ion conductivity was measured by a quadrupole method, and the results are shown in Table 9 below.

division Durability Evaluation
(μmol / hrg) Ion conductivity
(S / cm) Preparation Example 2-1 25.2 0.126 Preparation Example 2-2 31.7 0.122 Preparation Example 2-3 33.3 0.123 Preparation Example 2-4 18.9 0.127 Preparation Example 2-5 14.1 0.127 Preparation Example 2-6 7.3 0.121 Preparation Example 2-7 35.5 0.127 Preparation Example 2-8 6.9 0.122 Comparative Preparation Example 2-1 54.4 0.124 Comparative Preparation Example 2-2 52.8 0.113 Comparative Preparation Example 2-3 54.3 0.123 Comparative Preparation Example 2-4 53.7 0.125 Comparative Preparation Example 2-5 47.1 0.117

Looking at the experimental results of Table 9, Preparation Examples 2-1 to 2-8 showed a fluorine ion concentration of 40 μmol / hr · g or less, it was confirmed that it has excellent durability, excellent ions of 0.120 S / cm or more It was confirmed that it has conductivity. On the contrary, Comparative Preparation Examples 2-1 to 2-5 showed a tendency of poor durability with a fluorine ion concentration of 45 μmol / hr · g or more, Comparative Preparation Examples 2-2 and Comparative Preparation Examples 2-5 In the case of, the ion conductivity was significantly lower than the preparation example. In addition, looking at the durability evaluation measurement results of Preparation Examples 2-1 to 2-8, as the Ce content increases, the fluorine ion concentration tends to decrease, which increases the radical removal effect by Ce, thereby attacking the electrolyte membrane. As the radicals decrease, the concentration of the eluted fluorine ion decreases and the durability increased.

EXAMPLE  1: Preparation of electrolyte membrane

A Nafion solution was prepared by mixing 1 part by weight of spherical hollow silica with an average particle diameter of 50 nm based on 100 parts by weight of Nafion, a fluorine ionomer.

Next, the porous support prepared in Preparation Example 1-1 was impregnated in the Nafion solution and then taken out and put in a vacuum oven, followed by drying at 80 ° C. for 10 minutes. Next, heat treatment was performed at 160 ° C. for 3 minutes to prepare a porous support impregnated with an electrolyte having a thickness of 15 μm.

EXAMPLE  2 to 3 and Comparative example  1 to 2

Prepared under the same conditions as in Example 1, but by changing the type of support as shown in Table 10 to prepare a porous support impregnated with an electrolyte.

Experimental Example  5: weight variation coefficient measurement

(1) The weight variation coefficient (CV1,%) was measured through the following equation 2 by measuring the weight of the PTFE porous support before the electrolyte impregnation prepared in Examples and Comparative Examples and the weight of the electrolyte membrane coated with the electrolyte layer on the support after electrolyte impregnation. Calculated.

[Relationship 1]

Weight variation coefficient (CV1,%) = (porous support thickness after electrolyte treatment-porous support weight before electrolyte treatment) / (porous support weight before electrolyte treatment) × 100%

division Support type Before electrolyte impregnation
Weight (g) Weight after electrolyte impregnation (g) Coefficient of variation
(%) Example 1 Preparation Example 1-1 7 17.1 145% Example 2 Preparation Example 1-3 8.5 14.0 65% Example 3 Preparation Example 1-12 5 19.5 290% Comparative Example 1 Comparative Preparation Example 1-1 9.2 11.3 23% Comparative Example 2 Comparative Preparation Example 1-3 7.6 10.2 35% Comparative Example 3 Comparative Preparation Example 1-5 8.6 9.1 6% Comparative Example 4 Comparative Preparation Example 1-6 4.7 34.5 633% Comparative Example 5 Comparative Preparation Example 1-8 9.4 10.6 13% Comparative Example 6 Comparative Preparation Example 1-9 4.3 28.8 569% Comparative Example 7 Comparative Preparation Example 1-10 9.5 10.7 12%

Looking at the experimental results of Table 10, in the case of Examples 1 to 3, it was confirmed that the weight variation coefficient is increased to 40% or more, preferably 60% to 300% range. In contrast, when the porous supports of Comparative Preparation Examples 1-1, Comparative Preparation Examples 1-3, Comparative Preparation Examples 1-5, and Comparative Preparation Examples 1-8 were used, the average pore size of the porous support was less than 0.08 µm. Although it had strength and modulus, the amount of electrolyte impregnation in the porous support resulted in less than 40% of the weight variation coefficient. In addition, when the porous supports of Comparative Preparation Examples 1-6 and Comparative Examples 1-9 were used, the weight variation was The coefficient was very high, over 300%.

Referring to Table 10, it can be seen that in the case of Examples 1 to 3 exhibits a high weight variation coefficient characteristics compared to Comparative Examples 1 to 2. Therefore, it can be seen that Comparative Examples 1 to 3 according to one embodiment of the present invention are more electrolyte-containing.

Production Example  One : For PEMFC  Preparation of Composite Electrolyte Membrane

The PTFE porous support prepared in Preparation Example 1-1 was prepared.

The first ionomer solution was prepared by mixing CeZnO metal oxide particles (radical scavengers) having a mean particle size (D ₅₀ ) of 122 nm and a remaining amount of Nafion solution prepared in Preparation Example 2-8, but using CeZnO metal oxide particles 0.12 wt% and To prepare a first ionomer solution 1 to 2 each containing 0.3% by weight.

Further, CeZnO metal oxide particles (radical scavenger) of Preparation Example 2-8 And to prepare a second ionomer solution by mixing the remaining amount of Nafion solution, but prepared a second ionomer solution 1 to 2 containing 0.08% by weight and 0.6% by weight of CeZnO metal oxide particles, respectively.

The PTFE porous support was fixed to the glass substrate, and impregnated in the first ionomer solution 1 on one surface of the PTFE porous support using an applicator. Next, one surface of the PTFE porous support which was continuously impregnated with the first ionomer solution 1 was impregnated with the first ionomer solution 2. Next, the PTFE porous support impregnated in the first ionomer solution 1 to 2 was introduced into a vacuum oven at 80 ° C., and dried for 10 minutes to form a first ionomer layer on one surface of the PTFE porous support. In this case, the first ionomer layer was formed in a multi-layer in order of L1 and L2 by applying ionomers having different radical scavenger contents (wt%). L1 is a first ionomer layer formed by the first ionomer solution 1, and L2 is a first ionomer layer formed by the first ionomer solution 2.

Next, using the applicator, the other surface of the PTFE porous support on which the first ionomer layer of the multi-layer structure was formed was impregnated in the second ionomer solution 1. Next, the PTFE porous support which was continuously impregnated in the second ionomer solution 1 was impregnated in the second ionomer solution 2. Next, the PTFE porous support impregnated in the second ionomer solution 1 to 2 was introduced into a vacuum oven at 80 ° C., and dried for 10 minutes to form a second ionomer layer on one surface of the PTFE porous support. In this case, the second ionomer layer was formed in a multi-layer in order of L3 and L4 by applying ionomers having different radical scavenger contents (% by weight). L 3 is a second ionomer layer formed by the second ionomer solution 1, and L 4 is a second ionomer layer formed by the second ionomer solution 2.

In this case, the average content of CeZnO metal oxide applied to the entire first ionomer layer including L1 and L2 is about 1.05 wt%, and the average content of CeZnO metal oxide applied to the entire second ionomer layer including L3 and L4. Is about 1.7 weight percent.

Next, heat treatment was performed at 160 ° C. for 3 minutes to prepare a composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC having a thickness of a first ionomer layer of 8 μm, a thickness of a second ionomer layer of 8 μm, and a PTFE porous support layer of 14 μm.

[Equation 2]

D _{60 ~ 100} > D _{0 ~ 40}

In Equation 2, D _{0 to 40} and D _{60 to 100} represent radical scavengers in the total weight of the radical scavenger in the ionomer layer at a distance away from the junction surface between the first ionomer layer and the support in the thickness direction of the support. (% By weight), and when the end distance of the first ionomer layer farthest from the bonding surface between the first ionomer layer and the support is 100%, D _{0 to 40} represent the first ionomer from the bonding surface. The radical scavenger content (% by weight) in the first ionomer layer located at a distance of 0% to 40% in the direction of the end of the layer, and D _60-100 is 60% in the direction of the end of the first ionomer layer from the bonding surface. It means the content (% by weight) of the radical scavenger in the first ionomer layer located at a distance of ˜100%.

[Equation 3]

D _{'60 ~ 100} >D' _{0 ~ 40}

In Equation 3, D ' _{0 to 40} and D' _{60 to 100} are radical scavengers in the total weight of the radical scavenger in the ionomer layer at a distance away from the junction surface between the second ionomer layer and the support in the thickness direction of the support. As the content (% by weight), when the end distance of the second ionomer layer farthest from the bonding surface between the first ionomer layer and the support is based on 100%, D ′ _{0 to 40} is determined from the bonding surface. Radical scavenger content (%) in the second ionomer layer located at a distance of 0% to 40% in the direction of the end of the second ionomer layer, and D _{'60 ~ 100} is the end direction of the second ionomer layer from the bonding surface. This means the content (%) of radical scavengers in the second ionomer layer located at a distance of 60% to 100%.

Production Example  2 to 6 and Comparative Production Example  1 to 8

A composite electrolyte membrane was prepared in the same manner as in Preparation Example 1, except that the radical scavenger content and type in Table 10 and the Nafion solution for forming the first ionomer layer and / or the second ionomer layer were different. And Comparative Preparation Examples 1 to 8 were each prepared a composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC.

In Table 11 below, D _0-40 , D _60-100 , D ' _{0 to 40} and D _{'60 to 100} are each as defined in Equation 1 or Equation 3 above.

Production Example  7 ~ Production Example  8

In the same manner as in Preparation Example 1, the first ionomer solution 1 to 2 and the second ionomer solution 1 to 2 of the same concentration were prepared, respectively, to prepare a composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC. In this case, the first and second ionomer solutions are prepared using CeO ₂ (purchased from US Research Nanomaterials, Inc.) instead of the CeZnO metal oxide of Preparation Example 2-8 as a radical scavenger. The radical scavenger content is shown in Table 11 below.

division In the first ionomer layer
Radical scavenger content In the second ionomer layer
Radical scavenger content Average content D _0-40 D _60-100 Average content D _{'0 ~ 40} D _{'60 ~ 100} Preparation Example 1 1.05% by weight 0.6 wt% 1.5 wt% 1.7 wt% 0.4 wt% 3.0 wt% Preparation Example 2 1.05% by weight 0.6 wt% 1.5 wt% 1.9 wt% 0.8 wt% 3.0 wt% Preparation Example 3 0.8 wt% 0.6 wt% 1.0 wt% 1 wt% 0.4 wt% 1.6 wt% Preparation Example 4 0.65% by weight 0.3 wt% 1.0 wt% 1 wt% 0.4 wt% 1.6 wt% Preparation Example 5 0.55 wt% 0.3 wt% 0.8 wt% 1 wt% 0.4 wt% 1.6 wt% Preparation Example 6 0.35 wt% 0.1 wt% 0.6 wt% 0.6 wt% 0.4 wt% 0.8 wt% Preparation Example 7 1.05% by weight 0.6 wt% 1.5 wt% 1.7 wt% 0.4 wt% 3.0 wt% Preparation Example 8 1.05% by weight 0.6 wt% 1.5 wt% 1.9 wt% 0.8 wt% 3.0 wt% Comparative Production Example 1 1 wt% 0.4 wt% 1.6 wt% 1 wt% 0.4 wt% 1.6 wt% Comparative Production Example 2 1.9 wt% 0.8 wt% 3.0 wt% 1.05% by weight 0.6 wt% 1.5 wt% Comparative Production Example 3 1.3 wt% 0.3 wt% 1.0 wt% 1 wt% 1.6 wt% 0.4 wt% Comparative Production Example 4 0.65% by weight 1.0 wt% 0.3 wt% 1 wt% 0.4 wt% 1.6 wt% Comparative Production Example 5 0.65% by weight 0.3 wt% 1.0 wt% 0.25 wt% 0% by weight 0.5 wt% Comparative Production Example 6 0.65% by weight 0.3 wt% 1.0 wt% 2.5% by weight 1.0 wt% 4.0 wt% Comparative Production Example 7 0.15% by weight 0% by weight 0.3 wt% 1 wt% 0.4 wt% 1.6 wt% Comparative Production Example 8 2 wt% 1.0 wt% 3.0 wt% 1 wt% 0.4 wt% 1.6 wt%

Experimental Example  6: For PEMFC  Experiment for measuring durability and ion conductivity of composite electrolyte membrane

One) Fenton  Test( Fenton  test)

Each of the composite electrolyte membranes for PEMFCs of Preparation Examples 1 to 8 and Comparative Preparation Examples 1 to 8 was prepared with test pieces having a size of 5 cm 5 cm (lengthwise), and dried in an oven at 80 ° C. for 5 hours or more, and then the mass was measured. . Was immersed in a solution prepared by 200g 3ppm Fe ^{+ 2} was added to the prepared specimen in a 2% hydrogen peroxide solution and allow to stand for 80 ℃, 120 hours. The fluorine ion concentration eluted from the test piece was measured using a fluorine ion selective electrode, and the results are shown in Table 12. In the Fenton test, the lower the measured value, the lower the fluorine ion elution, that is, the durability of the electrolyte membrane is excellent.

2) Ion Conductivity Measurement

Each of the composite electrolyte membranes for PEMFC of Preparation Examples 1 to 8 and Comparative Preparation Examples 1 to 8 was prepared in a size of 1 cm 5 cm (horizontal length), and immersed in distilled water at 80 ° C. for 5 hours and then fastened. After dipping the cell in distilled water, the impedance was measured after setting the temperature at 25 ° C. The ion conductivity was calculated and the results are shown in Table 12 below.

division Durability Evaluation (μmol / hrg) Ion Conductivity (S / cm) Preparation Example 1 2.1 0.117 Preparation Example 2 1.9 0.102 Preparation Example 3 9.8 0.121 Preparation Example 4 9.7 0.124 Preparation Example 5 11.8 0.126 Preparation Example 6 18.7 0.131 Preparation Example 7 2.3 0.114 Preparation Example 8 2.1 0.100 Comparative Production Example 1 9.5 0.112 Comparative Production Example 2 10.5 0.101 Comparative Production Example 3 28.3 0.123 Comparative Production Example 4 15.8 0.124 Comparative Production Example 5 54.8 0.130 Comparative Production Example 6 1.8 0.094 Comparative Production Example 7 14.1 0.129 Comparative Production Example 8 9.8 0.098

Looking at the experimental results of Table 12, in Preparation Examples 1 to 8, the radical scavenger content in the first ionomer and the second ionomer have a higher overall ion durability and superior ion conductivity than Comparative Preparation Example 1 of the same It can be confirmed that the performance is excellent. Particularly, Preparation Examples 1 to 6 using CeZnO-based metal oxide particles as PEMFC radical scavengers have lower fluorine ion concentrations than Preparation Examples 7 to 8 using CeO ₂ as PEMFC radical scavenger, resulting in superior durability and ions. On the contrary, in Comparative Example 2, in which the radical scavenger of the first ionomer layer had an average concentration higher than the average concentration of the second ionomer layer, the ionic conductivity was compared with Preparation Example 1. The results were significantly lower.

And, Comparative Production Example 3 and D _{0 ~ 40 in} the first ionomer layer has a higher radical scavenger content than D _{60 ~ 100} and The second case of the ionomer in layer D _{0 ~ 40 60 ~ 100} D is more radical scavenger Comparative Production Example 4 The content of large, as compared to Production Example 4, there is a problem in poor durability larger relatively.

Further, in Comparative Production Example 5 in which the average content of radical scavenger in the first ionomer layer was too low and in Comparative Production Example 7 in which the average content of radical scavenger in the second ionomer layer was too low, the ion conductivity was good, but the durability was very high. The results were bad.

In Comparative Production Example 6 in which the average amount of radical scavenger in the first ionomer layer and the Comparative Scavenger Average content in the second ionomer layer were too high, durability was very good, but the ion conductivity was very good. It was confirmed that there is a problem that the performance of the electrolyte membrane is so low that it is too low.

Through the examples and experimental examples, it was confirmed that the composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC prepared by the method of the present invention not only had an excellent radical removing effect, but also had excellent physical properties, and thus durability, that is, long-term stability and performance. It is expected that this improved membrane-electrode assembly for PEMFCs and PEMFCs can be provided.

As mentioned above, the present invention has been described in detail with reference to preferred examples and experimental examples, but the present invention is not limited to the above examples and experimental examples, and has ordinary knowledge in the art within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Many modifications and variations are possible.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Porous support 2 First ionomer layer 3 Second ionomer layer
5. Radical Scavenger 10 Composite Electrolyte Membrane 21 Gas Diffusion Layer
22 catalyst layer 23 anode electrode substrate 23 'cathode electrode substrate

Claims (14)

A first ionomer layer disposed in an anode direction; It includes; the support layer and the second ionomer layer disposed in the cathode (cathode) direction
A first electrolyte layer and a second ionomer layer include a radical scavenger so as to satisfy the following Equation 1, a composite electrolyte membrane for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC);
Equation 1
Radical scavenger average particle diameter in the first ionomer layer> Radical scavenger average particle diameter in the second ionomer layer
The composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC according to claim 1, wherein the radical scavenger in the first ionomer layer has an average particle diameter of 30 to 100 nm, and the radical scavenger in the second ionomer layer has an average particle diameter of 1 to 30 nm.
The method of claim 1, wherein the radical scavenger in the first ionomer layer and the radical scavenger in the second ionomer layer are independently CeO, CeO ₂ , Ce ₂ O ₃ , ZnO, MnO ₂ , Mn ₂ O ₃ , Mn ₃ Composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC, characterized in that it comprises at least one selected from O ₄ , ZrO ₂ , and MoO ₃ .
The composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC according to claim 1, wherein the average content of the radical scavenger in the first ionomer layer and the average content of the radical scavenger in the second ionomer layer are 1: 1.25 to 10 weight ratio.
2. The composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC according to claim 1, wherein the radical scavenger distribution in the first ionomer layer satisfies Equation 2;
[Equation 2]
D _{60 ~ 100} > D _{0 ~ 40}
In Equation 2, D _{0 to 40} and D _{60 to 100} represent radical scavengers in the total weight of the radical scavenger in the ionomer layer at a distance away from the junction surface between the first ionomer layer and the support in the thickness direction of the support. (% By weight), and when the end distance of the first ionomer layer farthest from the bonding surface between the first ionomer layer and the support is 100%, D _{0 to 40} represent the first ionomer from the bonding surface. The radical scavenger content (% by weight) in the first ionomer layer located at a distance of 0% to 40% in the direction of the end of the layer, and D _60-100 is 60% in the direction of the end of the first ionomer layer from the bonding surface. It means the content (% by weight) of the radical scavenger in the first ionomer layer located at a distance of ˜100%.
2. The composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC according to claim 1, wherein the radical scavenger distribution in the second ionomer layer satisfies Equation 3 below;
[Equation 3]
D _{'60 ~ 100} >D' _{0 ~ 40}
In Equation 3, D ' _{0 to 40} and D' _{60 to 100} are radical scavengers in the total weight of the radical scavenger in the ionomer layer at a distance away from the junction surface between the second ionomer layer and the support in the thickness direction of the support. As the content (% by weight), when the end distance of the second ionomer layer farthest from the bonding surface between the first ionomer layer and the support is based on 100%, D ′ _{0 to 40} is determined from the bonding surface. Radical scavenger content (%) in the second ionomer layer located at a distance of 0% to 40% in the direction of the end of the second ionomer layer, and D _{'60 ~ 100} is the end direction of the second ionomer layer from the bonding surface. This means the content (%) of radical scavengers in the second ionomer layer located at a distance of 60% to 100%.
The method of claim 1, wherein the support layer comprises a PTFE (Poly tetra fluoro ethylene) porous support,
The PTFE porous support is a composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC, characterized in that the uniaxial direction (length direction) tensile strength of 40 MPa or more and the biaxial direction (width direction) tensile strength of 40 MPa or more, measured according to ASTM D 822 .
The composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC according to claim 7, wherein the PTFE porous support has a uniaxial (length) modulus of 40 MPa or more and a biaxial (width) modulus of 40 MPa or more.
8. The composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC according to claim 7, wherein the average pore size of the PTFE porous support is 0.080 µm to 0.200 µm, and the average porosity is 60% to 90%.
Preparing a PTFE porous support;
Forming a first ionomer layer on one surface of the PTFE porous support;
Forming a second ionomer layer on the other surface of the support on which the first ionomer layer is formed; And
And heat-treating the PTFE porous support on which the first ionomer layer and the second ionomer layer are formed.
The first ionomer layer and the second ionomer layer of the prepared composite electrolyte membrane comprises a radical scavenger (radical scavenger) to satisfy the following equation 1;
Equation 1
Radical scavenger average particle diameter in the first ionomer layer> Radical scavenger average particle diameter in the second ionomer layer
The method of claim 10, wherein the PTFE porous support of step 1 comprises the steps 1-1 to prepare a paste by mixing and stirring the PTFE powder and the liquid lubricant;
1-2 steps of aging the paste;
1-3 to produce an unbaked tape by extruding and rolling the aged paste;
1 to 4 steps of drying the unbaked tape and removing the liquid lubricant;
1-5 steps of uniaxially stretching the unbaked tape from which the lubricant is removed;
1-6 steps of biaxially stretching the uniaxially stretched unbaked tape; And
Method of producing a composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC, comprising the steps of 1-7;
The method of claim 11, wherein the porous support prepared by performing the step 1-7 step impregnated in the electrolyte solution step 1-8; And
Method 1-9 of drying and heat-treating the impregnated PTFE porous support; Method for producing a composite electrolyte membrane for PEMFC further comprising.
Anode (anode); Anode catalyst layer; The composite electrolyte membrane of any one of claims 1 to 9; Cathode catalyst layer; And a cathode (reduction electrode). The film-electrode assembly for PEMFC, comprising: a.
An electricity generator comprising the membrane-electrode assembly and the separator of claim 13, wherein the electricity generator generates electricity through an electrochemical reaction between a fuel and an oxidant;
A fuel supply unit supplying fuel to the electricity generation unit; And
An oxidant supply unit for supplying an oxidant to the generator; Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell comprising a.

Images