KR102460859B1 - Automation-based intellectual property valuation system - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to an automation-based intellectual property valuation system. More specifically, a system which integrates information entered and evaluated in a survey, technology commercialization-related information surveyed by an evaluator, and a database (DB) of companies and intellectual properties, thereby calculating the value of an intellectual property (IP) based on automation with big data of the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund, estimating future sales from future growth potential of a company and the evaluation of future value by using quantitative growth potential evaluation, growth potential measurement and qualitative growth potential evaluation through a sales estimation unit of the future management evaluation system, automatically reflecting technical capability evaluation, which is nonfinancial information, and Smart class 3 of an invention-related institution to evaluation factors of IP value through an evaluation factor automatic-calculation unit and a technology commercialization sales prediction unit of the technical capability evaluation link system as well as automatically predicting a cash flow which can occur in the future technology life cycle through sigmoid analysis utilizing comprehensive information related to financial factors and technological capabilities, and automatically calculating IP valuation by using a revenue approach method and a royalty deduction method on results of an individual valuation model through an IP valuation automatic calculation unit of the intellectual property automatic-valuation system.

Description

Automation-based intellectual property valuation system

The present invention establishes a system that integrates the information input and evaluated in the survey, the technology commercialization-related information researched by the evaluator, and the database (DB) of companies and intellectual property, so that automation-based The value of intellectual property (IP) can be calculated, and the company's future growth potential and future value can be calculated using quantitative growth potential evaluation and company growth potential measurement and qualitative growth potential evaluation through the sales estimation part of the future management evaluation system. Future sales can be estimated from the evaluation, and IP value is evaluated using non-financial information such as technology competency evaluation and invention-related institution’s Smart Grade 3 through the evaluation factor automatic calculation unit and technology commercialization sales prediction unit of the technology competency evaluation linkage system Not only can it be automatically reflected in factors, but it is also possible to automatically predict cash flows that may occur in the future technology life cycle through sigmoid analysis using comprehensive information related to financial factors and technological capabilities, and the value of intellectual property (IP) Technology on an automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system that can automatically calculate IP value evaluation using the profit approach and royalty deduction method for the results of the individual evaluation model through the IP value evaluation automatic calculation unit of the automatic evaluation calculation system to be.

For financial institutions, guarantee institutions, investors and companies, credit rating analysis is a very important management factor that can confirm the possibility of default by investment partners or customers.

Therefore, in the past, in order to check the creditworthiness of a company, an attempt is made to objectively judge the creditworthiness of a company based on management and financial information such as management, finance, stock price, etc. There exists a method that uses this method to conduct examination and rating of companies to be evaluated.

Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No. 2000-348015 discloses that stock prices, interest rates, and foreign exchange rates (promissory notes) that fluctuate daily in corporate evaluation based on data with a relatively long renewal period every one year or four quarters, etc., to reflect changes in the economy based on financial data Similarly, it is described that the change can be predicted and dynamically calculated from data with a relatively short update period. A number of techniques for analyzing a company's creditworthiness have been developed and applied, but a method for calculating company value that reflects a company's growth potential and future prospects has not been developed.

A company's creditworthiness is a method of quantifying and grading negative factors of a company by statistically predicting the possibility of default within one year based on financial information and quantitative factors. On the other hand, enterprise value calculation uses information such as business activities, financial activities, and industries of a company to calculate the company's ability to create value through long-term business activities as an objective number (corporate value) and grade it to use it in decision-making. will do

In general, the value of a company does not mean the book price on the balance sheet represented by total assets = liabilities + shareholder capital based on the double-entry bookkeeping principle in accounting, but is roughly calculated by the market capitalization of stocks + liabilities. In other words, the value of a company is defined as the sum of the market value of stocks traded in the stock market and liabilities.

However, in the case of non-listed companies, the stock market capitalization is not calculated because stocks are not traded on the stock market.

Therefore, in order to distinguish between a good company with excellent future corporate value and a bad company with a poor future corporate value, a corporate value model is needed to calculate the corporate value by substituting the market capitalization of stocks. Once the corporate value is calculated, the economy can be revitalized through active support for companies with excellent future prospects, and economic shocks can be alleviated by inducing a soft landing for companies that need to be retired.

In recent years, the impact of intangible assets on the value of companies in the service industry, IT industry, and technology-intensive industries has been continuously increasing, and the ratio of intangible assets to the value of the company is also increasing. As the value of intangible assets grows, the value of intangible assets largely determines the value of a company.

However, since the stock market capitalization is determined by the stock price in the market, it is important for investors to determine whether the value of intangible assets calculated by the current stock price and the book shareholder's capital is appropriate in making stock trading decisions. It is becoming a very important factor.

Accordingly, the increase in the value of intangible assets has become an important task in business strategy for companies.

As such, establishing a valuation method for intangible assets is an essential task when calculating corporate value. Since it consists of an asset, it is not easy to evaluate its value. In consideration of this, there have been attempts to evaluate intangible assets from the past, but there is a problem that the validity of corporate value cannot be evaluated by accepting the value of intangible assets quantitatively and qualitatively.

In addition, there is no objective methodology presented for evaluating the value of a company considering the value of intangible assets, and there is currently no introduction and implementation of the corporate value certification system based on the calculated company value.

Therefore, by building a system that integrates the information entered and evaluated in the survey, the information related to technology commercialization surveyed by the evaluator, and the database (DB) of companies and intellectual property, the automation-based intellectual property (IP) ( The development of an automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system that can calculate IP) value is urgently required.

KR 10-2005-7017412 (2005. 9. 16)

Therefore, the present invention was conceived to solve the above problems, by constructing a system that integrates the information input and evaluated in the survey, the technology commercialization-related information researched by the evaluator, and the database (DB) of companies and intellectual property. The purpose of this is to provide an automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system that can calculate the automation-based intellectual property (IP) value by using the big data of the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund.

Another object of the present invention is to estimate future sales from the evaluation of the company's future growth potential and future value using the quantitative growth potential evaluation and the company's growth potential measurement and the qualitative growth potential evaluation through the sales estimation unit of the future management evaluation system. It is to provide a system for evaluating the value of intellectual property based on automation that can be estimated.

Another object of the present invention is to automatically reflect in the evaluation factor of IP value by utilizing the technology competency evaluation, which is non-financial information, and the Smart 3 level of the invention-related institution through the evaluation factor automatic calculation unit and the technology commercialization sales prediction unit of the technology competency evaluation linkage system. It is to provide an automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system that can automatically predict cash flows that may occur in the future technology life cycle through sigmoid analysis using comprehensive information related to financial factors and technological capabilities. .

Another object of the present invention is to automatically calculate the IP value evaluation by using the profit approach and royalty deduction method for the results of the individual evaluation model through the IP value evaluation automatic calculation unit of the IP value evaluation automatic calculation system. It is to provide an automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system.

To achieve the above object, the automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention for achieving the above object is a target company, depending on the type of business, the continuous growth department (with more than 7 years of work experience), the start-up growth department (with 5 to 7 years of work experience) years) and the early stage of start-up (with 3 to 5 years of experience), and regardless of the industry, companies in the Startup Department (with less than 3 years of experience) that have two financial statements and those who do not hold financial statements among all companies It is a model that reflects the attributes of individual companies as it is classified as a company that has only one financial statement or has only one financial statement. A multiple regression model that analyzes the causal relationship between independent and dependent variables and a model that reflects collective attributes. It includes a sales estimator that classifies the analysis target into several subgroups by charting the decision rule or calculates the next, chacha, and chacha-cha-cha-cha-edicted sales using one of the decision tree models, which is an analysis method that makes predictions, a future management evaluation system for estimating future sales from the evaluation of the company's future growth potential and future value using quantitative growth potential evaluation and company growth potential measurement and qualitative growth potential evaluation; In the areas of business feasibility, technology, marketability, and rights, which are the evaluation factors of the intellectual property value evaluation system, the evaluation score calculated for each sub-item through the technology competency evaluation, a non-financial evaluation model, is applied to the It is automatically reflected in the evaluation factors, and the evaluation is divided into technology competency evaluation and Smart 3 grade. Management’s level of expertise, management’s capital participation, technology development organization, technology equipment security status, technology development manpower expertise, technology development and awards (certification) results, intellectual property ownership status, R&D investment ratio, facility level Appropriateness, capital raising ability, marketing capacity, diversity of vendors, sustainable profit creation ability, technology differentiation, difficulty of imitation, technology lifespan, technology perfection, market size, market growth potential, market competition situation, related industry conditions, Market share, ease of entry into the market, and comparative advantage with competing products. The detailed evaluation items of Smart 3 are: an automatic evaluation factor calculation unit for rights and gender; The company total sales adjustment unit that adjusts the sales of the estimated financial statements for the 1st to 7th periods calculated during the future management evaluation process to fit the 1st to 3rd years of the cash flow estimation period, and the company total calculated by the total company sales adjustment unit A technology commercialization sales calculation unit that calculates the estimated sales of technology commercialized products (services) in the cash flow estimation period of the first to third years by multiplying the estimated sales by the sales ratio of the technology commercialized products (services) for the next one year; The average annual growth rate calculation unit that calculates the average annual growth rate of the sales of technology commercialized products (services) in the cash flow estimation period for the first to third years calculated by the commercialization sales calculation unit, and the value of the average annual growth rate in the annual average growth rate calculation unit It includes a technology commercialization estimated sales calculation unit that calculates the estimated sales for each year during the residual cash flow estimation period after the fourth year of the technology commercialization product (service) by applying the sigmoid function, and the company data held by the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund Based on the future management evaluation, which is a three-year sales estimate from the next year calculated using the technology commercialization sales forecasting department; In addition, it can be automatically reflected in the evaluation factors of IP value by using non-financial information such as technology capability evaluation and smart grade 3 of invention-related institutions, as well as sigmoid analysis using comprehensive information related to financial factors and technological capabilities. a technology capability evaluation linkage system that automatically predicts cash flows that may occur in the future technology life cycle through Based on the technology commercialization sales estimated by the technology commercialization sales forecasting unit of the technology competency evaluation linkage system, the IP value evaluation amount is converted into an appropriate weight by applying the profit approach and the royalty deduction method to automatically calculate the final IP value evaluation amount It includes an IP valuation automatic calculation unit, and the profit approach is a value calculation method based on the technology element method, and the technology (IP) is converted to present value by applying an appropriate discount rate to future economic benefits that will occur through technology commercialization during the economic life of the target technology. It is a method of converting value, and it is an IP value calculation method using the discounted cash flow (DCF) method. It is necessary to calculate the value of the evaluation factor of It is a method of estimating the IP (patent right) value of the present value of royalties that must be paid Meaning, and returning it to the present value can be seen as the value of the ownership of IP (patent right) technology as a result. Intellectual property (IP) value evaluation automatic calculation system that requires the calculation of the value of the evaluation factor of the rate; It is characterized in that it includes.

delete

delete

delete

In the present invention, the basic formula of the revenue approach is

이고,

ego,

Here, the economic life of the technology (N) is the period (years) during which economic value can be created through evaluation IP (patent rights) technology commercialization, and is used as the 'cash flow estimation period' in the basic formula, and the discount rate (R) is the evaluation IP It is a discount rate that takes into account the risks inherent in the technology commercialization process of (patent right), free cash flow (FCFt ^* ) is the cash flow from technology commercialization that is expected every year during the economic life of the technology, and technology contribution is the business value As the proportion of IP (patent rights) technology contribution, it is industrial technology factor (%) × individual technology strength (%) × technology share (%),

IP (patent right) value calculation through the above profit approach is calculated and calculated using each detailed information of evaluation IP (patent right) information, evaluation IP (patent right) technology commercialization related information, technology commercialization subject information, and future growth evaluation information It is characterized in that it includes calculating the value of the evaluation IP (patent right) by substituting the value of each evaluation element into the basic formula.

delete

In the present invention, the basic formula of the royalty deduction method is

이고,

ego,

Here, the economic lifetime (N) of the technology is the period (years) during which economic value can be created through evaluation IP (patent rights) technology commercialization, and is used as the 'cash flow estimation period' in the basic formula, and the discount rate (R) is the evaluation IP It is a discount rate that takes into account the risks inherent in the technology commercialization process of (patent rights), and sales t is the (estimated) sales according to technology commercialization expected for each year during the economic life of the technology, and the final royalty rate is the standard royalty rate × It is the adjustment factor × the proportion of technology, and the tax rate is the corporate (income) tax rate including local income tax, applying the ‘pre-tax royalty income’ calculated through [sales × final royalty rate] as the tax base,

IP (patent right) value calculation through the royalty deduction method is calculated and calculated using each detailed information of evaluation IP (patent right) information, evaluation IP (patent right) technology commercialization related information, technology commercialization subject information, and future growth evaluation information It is characterized in that it includes calculating the value of the evaluation IP (patent right) by substituting the value of each evaluation element evaluated in the basic formula.

As described above, the automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system of the present invention has the following effects.

First, the present invention is automated using big data of the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund by constructing a system that integrates the information input and evaluated in the survey, the technology commercialization-related information researched by the evaluator, and the database (DB) of companies and intellectual property. It is possible to calculate the value of intellectual property (IP) based on

Second, the present invention estimates future sales from the evaluation of the company's future growth potential and future value using the quantitative growth potential evaluation and the company's growth potential measurement and the qualitative growth potential evaluation through the sales estimation unit of the future management evaluation system. can do.

Third, the present invention can be automatically reflected in the evaluation factors of IP value by using the technology capability evaluation, which is non-financial information, and the Smart 3 grade of invention-related institutions through the evaluation factor automatic calculation unit and the technology commercialization sales prediction unit of the technology competency evaluation link system. Of course, it is possible to automatically predict cash flows that may occur in the future technology life cycle through sigmoid analysis using comprehensive information related to financial factors and technological capabilities.

Fourth, the present invention can automatically calculate the IP value evaluation by using the profit approach method and the royalty deduction method for the results of the individual evaluation model through the IP value evaluation automatic calculation unit of the intellectual property (IP) value evaluation automatic calculation system. .

1 is a diagram illustrating the configuration of an automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a view showing the detailed configuration of the sales estimator of the future management evaluation system among the configurations of the automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3 is a view showing detailed evaluation items of an evaluation factor automatic calculation unit of a technology competency evaluation linkage system among the configuration of an automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
4 is a view showing the configuration and sales calculation of the technology commercialization sales forecasting unit of the technology competency evaluation linkage system among the configuration of the automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Hereinafter, referring to preferred embodiments of the present invention together with the accompanying drawings, it is as follows. In the description of the present invention, when it is determined that a detailed description of a related known technology or configuration may unnecessarily obscure the gist of the present invention, the detailed description thereof The description will be omitted, and the terms to be described later are terms defined in consideration of the functions in the present invention, which may vary depending on the intention or custom of the user or operator, so the definition is an automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system of the present invention. It should be made based on the content throughout this specification to be described.

Hereinafter, an automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

1 is a diagram illustrating the configuration of an automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a configuration of an automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention. It is a diagram showing the detailed configuration of the sales estimating unit of the future management evaluation system, and FIG. 3 is a detailed view of the evaluation factor automatic calculation unit of the technology competency evaluation linkage system among the configuration of the automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention It is a view showing evaluation items, and FIG. 4 is a view showing the configuration and sales calculation of the technology commercialization sales forecasting unit of the technology competency evaluation linkage system among the configurations of the automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

As shown in Figures 1 to 4, the inventor's automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system sets the target company according to the type of business in the continuous growth department 111 (with more than 7 years of work experience), the start-up growth section 112 (the work experience is 5 to 7 years) and the early stage of start-up (113) (with 3 to 5 years of work experience), and regardless of business type, It is a model that reflects the attributes of individual companies as they are divided into companies and early start-up companies that do not have financial statements or have only one financial statement among all companies. The multiple regression model, which is a method, and a model that reflects group attributes, classify the analysis target into several subgroups by charting the decision rule, or use one of the decision tree models, which is an analysis method to make predictions. and a sales estimator 110 for calculating expected sales of , chacha, and chacha-cha, using quantitative growth potential evaluation and corporate growth potential measurement and qualitative growth potential evaluation of the company's future growth potential and future value. a future management evaluation system 100 for estimating future sales from the evaluation; In the areas of business feasibility, technology, marketability, and rights, which are the evaluation factors of the intellectual property value evaluation system, the evaluation score calculated for each sub-item through the technology competency evaluation, a non-financial evaluation model, is applied to the It is automatically reflected in the evaluation factors, and the evaluation is divided into technology competency evaluation and Smart 3 grade. Management’s level of expertise, management’s capital participation, technology development organization, technology equipment security status, technology development manpower expertise, technology development and awards (certification) results, intellectual property ownership status, R&D investment ratio, facility level Appropriateness, capital raising ability, marketing capacity, diversity of vendors, sustainable profit creation ability, technology differentiation, difficulty of imitation, technology lifespan, technology perfection, market size, market growth potential, market competition situation, related industry conditions, Market share, ease of market entry, and comparative advantage with competing products, the detailed evaluation items of the Smart 3 grade include an automatic evaluation factor calculation unit 210 for rights and gender; The company total sales adjustment unit that adjusts the sales of the estimated financial statements for the 1st to 7th periods calculated during the future management evaluation process to fit the 1st to 3rd years of the cash flow estimation period, and the company total calculated by the total company sales adjustment unit A technology commercialization sales calculation unit that calculates the estimated sales of technology commercialized products (services) in the cash flow estimation period of the first to third years by multiplying the estimated sales by the sales ratio of the technology commercialized products (services) for the next one year; The average annual growth rate calculation unit that calculates the average annual growth rate of the sales of technology commercialized products (services) in the cash flow estimation period for the first to third years calculated by the commercialization sales calculation unit, and the value of the average annual growth rate in the annual average growth rate calculation unit It includes a technology commercialization estimated sales calculation unit that calculates the estimated sales for each year during the residual cash flow estimation period after the fourth year of the technology commercialization product (service) by applying the sigmoid function, and the company data held by the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund Based on the future management evaluation, which is a three-year sales estimate from the next year calculated using the technology commercialization sales forecasting unit 220; In addition, it can be automatically reflected in the evaluation factors of IP value by using non-financial information such as technology capability evaluation and smart grade 3 of invention-related institutions, as well as sigmoid analysis using comprehensive information related to financial factors and technological capabilities. a technology competency evaluation linkage system 200 for automatically predicting cash flows that may occur in the future technology life cycle through; Based on the technology commercialization sales estimated by the technology commercialization sales forecasting unit of the technology competency evaluation linkage system, the IP value evaluation amount is converted into an appropriate weight by applying the profit approach and the royalty deduction method to automatically calculate the final IP value evaluation amount It includes an IP value evaluation automatic calculation unit 310, wherein the profit approach is a value calculation method based on the technology element method, and an appropriate discount rate is applied to the future economic benefits to be generated through technology commercialization during the economic life period of the target technology to the present value. It is a method of converting technology (IP) value, and it is a method of calculating IP value using the discounted cash flow (DCF) method. It is necessary to calculate the value of the evaluation factor of the discount rate and technology contribution, and the royalty deduction method assumes that the company does not possess the IP (patent right) technology and licenses it from a third party, and during the economic life of the target technology This is a method of estimating the IP (patent right) value of the present value of royalties to be paid as a license fee. It means that there is no need to do this, and the fact that it is returned to its present value can be viewed as the value of IP (patent right) technology ownership as a result. An automatic intellectual property (IP) value evaluation automatic calculation system 300 that requires calculation of the value of the evaluation factor of sales and final royalty rate; to provide

The function of each technical means constituting the automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system according to the present invention will be described as follows.

The future management evaluation system 100 selects the target company according to the type of business type in the Sustainable Growth Department 111 (with more than 7 years of experience), the Startup Growth Department 112 (with 5 to 7 years of experience) and the early stage of start-up 113. Classified as (3 to 5 years of experience) and regardless of industry type, companies in the Startup Department (114) (with less than 3 years of experience) that have two financial statements, and those that do not have financial statements or have financial statements among all companies Including a sales estimator 110 that calculates the expected sales of the next, next, and next period by using one of the multiple regression model and the decision tree model as it is divided into the early start-up business unit 115 that has only one statement will be.

Since the multiple regression model and decision tree model described above are already publicly available technologies, they will be briefly described below.

Multiple regression is a model that reflects the attributes of individual companies, and is a method of analyzing the causal relationship between independent and dependent variables. will be.

Equation 1

Y = α + β1 ^* × 1 + β2 ^* × 2 + ... + βκ ^* × κ + ε

A decision tree is a model that reflects group attributes, and it is an analysis method that charts decision rules to classify analysis objects into several subgroups or perform predictions.

Here, the industry may be, for example, manufacturing, wholesale and retail and other service industries as the first group, and the construction industry as the second group. Enterprises are classified into one of externally supervised enterprises, medium-sized enterprises, small enterprises, and micro enterprises according to their size.

The technology competency evaluation linkage system 200 calculates the evaluation score for each detailed item through the technology competency evaluation, which is a non-financial evaluation model, in the business feasibility, technology, marketability, and rights sector, which are evaluation factors of the intellectual property value evaluation system, in the technology life cycle. The evaluation factor automatic calculation unit 210 that automatically reflects the evaluation factors of , technology contribution, final royalty rate, and discount rate, and the future management evaluation, which is an estimate of sales for three years from the next year, calculated using corporate data held by the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund It includes a technology commercialization sales forecasting unit 220 that predicts cash flow from the fourth year to the highest point of the life cycle, which is the 3/4 point of the entire technology life cycle, based on the sigmoid function.

Here, the evaluation in the evaluation factor automatic calculation unit 210 is divided into technical competency evaluation and Smart 3 grade, and the detailed evaluation items of the technical competency evaluation are experience in the same industry, level of technical knowledge, technical understanding, entrepreneurship, Technology management management ability, management level of expertise, management's capital participation, technology development organization, technology equipment security status, technology development manpower expertise, technology development and awards (certification) results, intellectual property rights holding status, R&D investment Ratio, adequacy of equipment level, capital raising capacity, marketing capacity, diversity of vendors, ability to generate sustainable profits, differentiation of technology, difficulty of imitation, lifespan of technology, technology perfection, market size, market growth potential, market competition , related industrial conditions, market share, ease of market entry, and comparative advantage with competing products, and the detailed evaluation item of Smart 3 is rights.

In addition, the technology commercialization sales forecasting unit 220 is a company total sales adjustment unit that adjusts the sales of the estimated financial statements of the 1st to 7th periods calculated in the future management evaluation process according to the 1st to 3rd years of the cash flow estimation period. (221) and; Calculate the estimated sales of technology commercialized products (services) in the 1st to 3rd year cash flow estimation period by multiplying the sales ratio of technology commercialized products (services) over the next one year a technology commercialization sales calculation unit 222; an average annual growth rate calculation unit 223 for calculating the average annual growth rate of technology commercialization product (service) sales in the first to third year cash flow estimation period calculated by the technology commercialization sales calculation unit; Estimated sales of technology commercialization by applying a sigmoid function to the value of the average annual growth rate in the average annual growth rate calculator part 224; will include

The IP value evaluation automatic calculation system 300 calculates the IP value evaluation amount by applying the profit approach and the royalty deduction method based on the technology commercialization sales estimated by the technology commercialization sales forecasting unit of the technology competency evaluation linkage system. It includes an IP value evaluation automatic calculation unit 310 that automatically calculates the final IP value evaluation amount by converting it into an appropriate weight.

Here, the profit approach in the IP value evaluation automatic calculation unit 310 is a value calculation method based on the technology element method, and an appropriate discount rate is applied to the future economic profit to be generated through technology commercialization during the economic life period of the target technology. It is a method of converting technology (IP) value, and it is a method of calculating IP value using the discounted cash flow (DCF) method. It is necessary to calculate the value of the discount rate and evaluation factors of technological contribution.

The basic formula for the above revenue approach is

이고,

ego,

Here, the economic life of the technology (N) is the period (years) during which economic value can be created through evaluation IP (patent rights) technology commercialization, and is used as the 'cash flow estimation period' in the basic formula, and the discount rate (R) is the evaluation IP It is a discount rate that takes into account the risks inherent in the technology commercialization process of (patent rights), free cash flow (FCFt ^* ) is the cash flow from technology commercialization expected every year during the economic life of the technology, and the technology contribution is IP (patent rights) among business values. ) is the ratio that technology contributes, which is industrial technology factor (%) × individual technology strength (%) × technology share (%).

In addition, the IP (patent right) value calculation through the above profit approach is calculated using each detailed information of evaluation IP (patent right) information, evaluation IP (patent right) technology commercialization related information, technology commercialization subject information, and future growth evaluation information, The value of the evaluation IP (patent right) is calculated by substituting the calculated value of each evaluation factor into the basic formula.

In addition, the royalty deduction method in the IP value evaluation automatic calculation unit 310 assumes that a company does not possess IP (patent right) technology and licenses it from a third party, and license costs during the economic life of the target technology. This is a method of estimating the IP (patent right) value of the present value of royalties to be paid through the royalty deduction method. This means that the present value is returned to the present value, and as a result, it can be viewed as the value of IP (patent right) technology ownership. It is necessary to calculate the value of the evaluation factor of the final royalty rate.

The basic formula for the royalty deduction method is

이고,

ego,

Here, the economic lifetime (N) of the technology is the period (years) during which economic value can be created through evaluation IP (patent rights) technology commercialization, and is used as the 'cash flow estimation period' in the basic formula, and the discount rate (R) is the evaluation IP It is a discount rate that takes into account the risks inherent in the technology commercialization process of (patent rights), sales t is the (estimated) sales from technology commercialization expected every year during the economic life of the technology, and the final royalty rate is the standard royalty rate × adjustment factor × technology , and the tax rate is the corporate (income) tax rate, including local income tax, applied to the 'pre-tax royalty income' calculated through [sales x final royalty rate] as the tax base.

In addition, the IP (patent right) value calculation through the royalty deduction method is calculated using each detailed information of evaluation IP (patent right) information, evaluation IP (patent right) technology commercialization related information, technology commercialization subject information, and future growth evaluation information. , to calculate the value of the evaluation IP (patent right) by substituting the calculated value of each evaluation factor into the basic formula.

As described above, a person of ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention pertains can make various substitutions, modifications and changes within the scope without departing from the technical spirit of the present invention, so it is limited to the above-described embodiments and the accompanying drawings it's not going to be

As described above, the automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system of the present invention can be applied to the field of evaluating intellectual property values.

100: Future Management Evaluation System 110: Sales Estimation Department
111: Sustainable Growth Department 112: Startup Growth Department
113: Start-up initial division 114: Start-up division
115: Ministry of Early Startups 200: Technology Competency Assessment Linkage System
210: automatic evaluation factor calculation unit 220: technology commercialization sales forecasting unit
221: Total corporate sales adjustment unit 222: Technology commercialization sales calculation unit
223: Average annual growth rate calculation unit 224: Technology commercialization estimated sales calculation unit
300: Intellectual property (IP) value evaluation automatic calculation system
310: IP value evaluation automatic calculation unit

Claims (7)

In the intellectual property value evaluation system based on automation,
The target companies are divided into the Department of Sustainable Growth (with more than 7 years of work experience), the Department of Startup Growth (with 5 to 7 years of work experience) and the early stage of start-up (with 3 to 5 years of work experience) according to the type of business, regardless of the type of business. This is a model that reflects the attributes of individual companies as they are divided into companies in the Startup Department (with less than 3 years of experience) with two statements and companies that do not have financial statements or have only one financial statement among all companies. A multiple regression model, which is a method to analyze the causal relationship between a causal relationship and a dependent variable, and a model that reflects group attributes It includes a sales estimation unit that calculates the next, next, and next-generation expected sales using one of the decision tree models, and measures the company's quantitative growth potential and growth potential, and uses qualitative growth potential assessment to determine the future of the company. a future management evaluation system for estimating future sales from the evaluation of growth potential and future value;
In the areas of business feasibility, technology, marketability, and rights, which are the evaluation factors of the intellectual property value evaluation system, the evaluation score calculated for each sub-item through the technology competency evaluation, a non-financial evaluation model, is applied to the It is automatically reflected in the evaluation factors, and the evaluation is divided into technology competency evaluation and Smart 3 grade. Management’s level of expertise, management’s capital participation, technology development organization, technology equipment security status, technology development manpower expertise, technology development and awards (certification) results, intellectual property ownership status, R&D investment ratio, facility level Appropriateness, capital raising ability, marketing capacity, diversity of vendors, sustainable profit creation ability, technology differentiation, difficulty of imitation, technology lifespan, technology perfection, market size, market growth potential, market competition situation, related industry conditions, Market share, ease of entry into the market, and comparative advantage with competing products. The detailed evaluation items of Smart 3 are: an automatic evaluation factor calculation unit for rights and gender; The company total sales adjustment unit that adjusts the sales of the estimated financial statements for the 1st to 7th periods calculated during the future management evaluation process to fit the 1st to 3rd years of the cash flow estimation period, and the company total calculated by the total company sales adjustment unit A technology commercialization sales calculation unit that calculates the estimated sales of technology commercialized products (services) in the cash flow estimation period of the first to third years by multiplying the estimated sales by the sales ratio of the technology commercialized products (services) for the next one year; The average annual growth rate calculation unit that calculates the average annual growth rate of the sales of technology commercialized products (services) in the cash flow estimation period for the first to third years calculated by the commercialization sales calculation unit, and the value of the average annual growth rate in the annual average growth rate calculation unit It includes a technology commercialization estimated sales calculation unit that calculates the estimated sales for each year during the residual cash flow estimation period after the fourth year of the technology commercialization product (service) by applying the sigmoid function, and the company data held by the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund Based on the future management evaluation, which is a three-year sales estimate from the next year calculated using the technology commercialization sales forecasting department; In addition, it can be automatically reflected in the evaluation factors of IP value by using non-financial information such as technology capability evaluation and smart grade 3 of invention-related institutions, as well as sigmoid analysis using comprehensive information related to financial factors and technological capabilities. a technology capability evaluation linkage system that automatically predicts cash flows that may occur in the future technology life cycle through
Based on the technology commercialization sales estimated by the technology commercialization sales forecasting unit of the technology competency evaluation linkage system, the IP value evaluation amount is converted into an appropriate weight by applying the profit approach and the royalty deduction method to automatically calculate the final IP value evaluation amount It includes an IP valuation automatic calculation unit, and the profit approach is a value calculation method based on the technology element method, and the technology (IP) is converted to present value by applying an appropriate discount rate to future economic benefits that will occur through technology commercialization during the economic life of the target technology. It is a method of converting value, and it is an IP value calculation method using the discounted cash flow (DCF) method. It is necessary to calculate the value of the evaluation factor of It is a method of estimating the IP (patent right) value of the present value of royalties that must be paid Meaning, and returning it to the present value can be seen as the value of the ownership of IP (patent right) technology as a result. Intellectual property (IP) value evaluation automatic calculation system that requires the calculation of the value of the evaluation factor of the rate; Automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system, characterized in that it includes a. delete delete delete The method of claim 1,
The basic formula for the above revenue approach is

ego,
Here, the economic life of the technology (N) is the period (years) during which economic value can be created through evaluation IP (patent rights) technology commercialization, and is used as the 'cash flow estimation period' in the basic formula, and the discount rate (R) is the evaluation IP It is a discount rate that takes into account the risks inherent in the technology commercialization process of (patent right), free cash flow (FCFt ^* ) is the cash flow from technology commercialization that is expected every year during the economic life of the technology, and technology contribution is the business value As the proportion of IP (patent rights) technology contribution, it is industrial technology factor (%) × individual technology strength (%) × technology share (%),
IP (patent right) value calculation through the above profit approach is calculated and calculated using each detailed information of evaluation IP (patent right) information, evaluation IP (patent right) technology commercialization related information, technology commercialization subject information, and future growth evaluation information An automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system, characterized in that it includes calculating the value of the evaluation IP (patent right) by substituting the value of each evaluation element into the basic formula. delete The method of claim 1,
The basic formula for the royalty deduction method is

ego,
Here, the economic lifetime (N) of the technology is the period (years) during which economic value can be created through evaluation IP (patent rights) technology commercialization, and is used as the 'cash flow estimation period' in the basic formula, and the discount rate (R) is the evaluation IP It is a discount rate that takes into account the risks inherent in the technology commercialization process of (patent rights), and sales t is the (estimated) sales according to technology commercialization expected for each year during the economic life of the technology, and the final royalty rate is the standard royalty rate × It is the adjustment factor × the proportion of technology, and the tax rate is the corporate (income) tax rate including local income tax, applying the ‘pre-tax royalty income’ calculated through [sales × final royalty rate] as the tax base,
IP (patent right) value calculation through the royalty deduction method is calculated and calculated using each detailed information of evaluation IP (patent right) information, evaluation IP (patent right) technology commercialization related information, technology commercialization subject information, and future growth evaluation information An automation-based intellectual property value evaluation system, characterized in that it includes calculating the value of the evaluation IP (patent right) by substituting the value of each evaluation element evaluated in the basic formula.

Images