Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

JP4561367B2 - Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus - Google Patents

Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4561367B2
JP4561367B2 JP2005004701A JP2005004701A JP4561367B2 JP 4561367 B2 JP4561367 B2 JP 4561367B2 JP 2005004701 A JP2005004701 A JP 2005004701A JP 2005004701 A JP2005004701 A JP 2005004701A JP 4561367 B2 JP4561367 B2 JP 4561367B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
test
tire
tread
road
road surface
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2005004701A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2006194652A (en
Inventor
敏男 落合
俊郎 大山
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd filed Critical Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Priority to JP2005004701A priority Critical patent/JP4561367B2/en
Publication of JP2006194652A publication Critical patent/JP2006194652A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4561367B2 publication Critical patent/JP4561367B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Tires In General (AREA)

Description

本発明は、空気入りタイヤの試験方法および試験装置に関し、さらに詳しくは、市場で発生するトレッドのベルト層のワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックの発生を効率よく再現でき、タイヤの耐久性を評価できる空気入りタイヤの試験方法および試験装置に関するものである。 The present invention relates to a test method and a test apparatus for a pneumatic tire, and more particularly, a pneumatic tire that can efficiently reproduce the occurrence of wire breakage and groove cracks in a tread belt layer that occurs in the market and can evaluate the durability of the tire. The present invention relates to a tire test method and a test apparatus.

従来からトラック、トレーラ等の高速連続走行車両で使用される重荷重用タイヤには、他のタイヤに比べて、トレッドのベルト層のワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックが発生しやすいという問題があった。   Conventionally, heavy-duty tires used in high-speed continuously traveling vehicles such as trucks and trailers have a problem that wire breaks and groove cracks in the tread belt layer are more likely to occur than other tires.

これは、ベルト層のタイヤ幅方向の曲げ剛性が高く、タイヤのトレッドの一部が段差に乗り上げた際に、段差の上段側路面での接地圧が下段側路面側よりも大幅に高くなり易く、段差近傍のトレッド溝の溝底部に大きな歪が発生することに起因するものである。トレッドが上段側路面のみに接地し、下段側路面に接地せず、宙に浮いた状態となることもあり、この場合には特に、発生し易くなる。   This is because the belt layer has high bending rigidity in the tire width direction, and when a part of the tire tread rides on the step, the contact pressure on the upper road surface of the step is likely to be significantly higher than the lower road surface side. This is because large strain is generated at the groove bottom of the tread groove near the step. The tread may be grounded only on the upper road surface, and may not be grounded on the lower road surface, and may float in the air.

このようなトレッドのベルト層のワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックに対するタイヤの耐久性を評価するには、実車に装着されたタイヤのトレッドの一部を段差に乗り上げた状態で走行して評価をしていたが、同一仕様のタイヤを用いても、市場で発生するようなワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックを発生させることが困難であり、また、テストドライバーの技量等によって、発生したワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックの程度のばらつきが大きいため、仕様が異なるタイヤで比較することが困難であった。さらに、この方法では評価精度を向上させるために大量のタイヤを評価する必要があり、時間もコストもかかり効率的ではないという問題があった。   In order to evaluate the durability of the tire against wire breakage or groove cracks in the belt layer of such a tread, the evaluation was performed by running a part of the tread of the tire mounted on the actual vehicle on a step. However, even if tires of the same specification are used, it is difficult to generate wire breaks and groove cracks that occur in the market. Also, depending on the skill of the test driver, etc. Due to the large variation, it was difficult to compare tires with different specifications. Furthermore, this method has a problem that it is necessary to evaluate a large number of tires in order to improve the evaluation accuracy, which is time consuming and expensive and is not efficient.

空気入りタイヤのショルダー部に設けた細リブに発生するクラックや欠けを再現する評価装置としては、基盤上を試験タイヤを円軌跡を描くように走行させて、その円軌跡上に突起物を配置して、試験タイヤを乗り上げさせるものが提案されている(特許文献1参照)。   As an evaluation device that reproduces cracks and chips generated in the thin ribs provided on the shoulder of a pneumatic tire, the test tire is run on the base in a circular path, and projections are placed on the circular path. And what makes a test tire get on is proposed (refer patent document 1).

しかしながら、この装置は市場での縁石や轍の乗り越えの繰り返しによるクラック等を再現するだけの装置であり、突起に乗り上げた時にタイヤが跳ねる構造となっているため、市場で発生するベルト層のワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックを再現することはできなかった。
実開平7−36038号公報
However, this device is a device that only reproduces cracks and the like due to repeated curbstones and overhangs on the market, and because it has a structure in which the tire jumps when it rides on the protrusion, the wire of the belt layer generated in the market Folds and groove cracks could not be reproduced.
Japanese Utility Model Publication No. 7-36038

本発明の目的は、市場で発生するトレッドのベルト層のワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックの発生を効率よく再現でき、タイヤの耐久性を評価できる空気入りタイヤの試験方法および試験装置を提供することにある。   An object of the present invention is to provide a test method and a test apparatus for a pneumatic tire that can efficiently reproduce the occurrence of wire breakage and groove cracks in a tread belt layer generated in the market and can evaluate the durability of the tire. .

上記目的を達成するため本発明の空気入りタイヤの試験方法は、延設された段差を有する試験路で、リム組みして所定の内圧にした試験タイヤを、前記段差がトレッド幅内に位置するように配置して、所定の荷重を負荷してトレッドを前記試験路の少なくとも上段側路面に接地させて、前記段差の延設方向に転動させることを特徴とするものである。   In order to achieve the above object, a test method for a pneumatic tire according to the present invention is a test road having an extended step, and the step is positioned within the tread width of a test tire that is assembled with a rim to have a predetermined internal pressure. It arrange | positions so that a predetermined load may be loaded, a tread may be grounded at least to the upper stage side road surface of the said test road, and it may roll in the extending direction of the said level | step difference.

また、本発明の空気入りタイヤの試験装置は、リム組みした試験タイヤを転動可能に保持するタイヤ保持装置と、延設された段差を有する試験路とを備え、前記タイヤ保持装置と前記試験路との少なくとも一方を、前記タイヤ保持装置が保持した試験タイヤのトレッドを前記試験路に接地させる方向に移動可能として、該方向に荷重を負荷できるようにするとともに、タイヤ幅方向に移動して試験タイヤの接地位置を調節可能とし、前記タイヤ保持装置と前記試験路との少なくとも一方を、前記段差の延設方向に移動可能とすることを特徴とするものである。   The pneumatic tire testing device of the present invention includes a tire holding device that holds a rim-assembled test tire in a rollable manner, and a test road having an extended step, and the tire holding device and the test At least one of the road is movable in the direction in which the tread of the test tire held by the tire holding device is brought into contact with the test road, the load can be applied in this direction, and the tire is moved in the tire width direction. The contact position of the test tire can be adjusted, and at least one of the tire holding device and the test road can be moved in the extending direction of the step.

本発明の空気入りタイヤの試験方法によれば、延設された段差を有する試験路で、リム組みして所定の内圧にした試験タイヤを、段差がトレッド幅内に位置するように配置して、所定の荷重を負荷してトレッドを試験路の少なくとも上段側路面に接地させて、段差の延設方向に転動させるので、上段側路面に接地したトレッドの接地圧が下段側路面側に比べて大幅に高くなり、段差近傍に位置するトレッド溝の溝底部に大きな歪が発生し、この部分にベルト層のワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックが発生し易い状態を定常的に作り出すことができる。   According to the test method for a pneumatic tire of the present invention, a test tire having a predetermined internal pressure by assembling a rim on a test road having an extended step is arranged so that the step is positioned within the tread width. Since the tread is grounded on at least the upper road surface of the test road under a predetermined load and rolled in the extending direction of the step, the ground pressure of the tread grounded on the upper road surface is lower than that of the lower road surface. Thus, a large strain is generated at the bottom of the tread groove located in the vicinity of the step, and a state in which a wire breakage or a groove crack in the belt layer is likely to occur can be constantly created.

これによって、市場で発生するベルト層のワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックの発生を効率よく再現できる。   As a result, it is possible to efficiently reproduce the occurrence of wire breakage and groove cracks in the belt layer generated in the market.

また発生したワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックの程度を把握することができるので、スペックの異なるタイヤのベルト層のワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックに対する比較評価も可能となり、タイヤの耐久性を評価できる。   In addition, since the degree of wire breakage and groove cracks that have occurred can be ascertained, it is possible to perform comparative evaluation on wire breakage and groove cracks in a belt layer of a tire having different specifications, and the durability of the tire can be evaluated.

本発明の空気入りタイヤの試験装置によれば、リム組みした試験タイヤを転動可能に保持するタイヤ保持装置と、延設された段差を有する試験路とを備え、タイヤ保持装置と試験路との少なくとも一方を、タイヤ保持装置が保持した試験タイヤのトレッドを試験路に接地させる方向に移動可能として、この方向に荷重を負荷できるようにするとともに、タイヤ幅方向に移動して試験タイヤの接地位置を調節可能とするので、試験タイヤのトレッドを所定の位置に配置して試験路の少なくとも上段側路面に接地させて、所定の荷重を負荷して、段差近傍に位置するトレッド溝の溝底部に大きな歪を発生させ、この部分にベルト層のワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックが発生し易い状態を定常的に作り出すことができる。   According to the pneumatic tire testing device of the present invention, the tire holding device includes a tire holding device that holds the rim-assembled test tire in a rollable manner, and a test road having an extended step, the tire holding device and the test road, At least one of the tires can be moved in the direction in which the tread of the test tire held by the tire holding device is brought into contact with the test road, so that a load can be applied in this direction, and the test tire is grounded by moving in the tire width direction. Since the position can be adjusted, the tread of the test tire is placed at a predetermined position, grounded to at least the upper road surface of the test road, loaded with a predetermined load, and the bottom of the tread groove located near the step In this portion, a state in which wire breakage or groove cracking of the belt layer is likely to occur can be constantly created.

さらに、タイヤ保持装置と試験路との少なくとも一方を段差の延設方向に移動可能とするので、試験タイヤを試験路に接地させながら段差の延設方向に転動させることができる。   Furthermore, since at least one of the tire holding device and the test road can be moved in the extending direction of the step, the test tire can be rolled in the extending direction of the step while being grounded on the test road.

この構造によって、上記した試験方法が実施可能となり、市場で発生するベルト層のワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックの発生を効率よく再現でき、スペックの異なるタイヤに対する比較評価も可能となり、タイヤの耐久性を評価できる。   This structure makes it possible to carry out the test methods described above, efficiently reproduce the occurrence of broken wire and groove cracks in the belt layer on the market, and enable comparative evaluation of tires with different specifications, and evaluate tire durability. it can.

以下、本発明の空気入りタイヤの試験方法および試験装置を図に示した実施形態に基づいて説明する。図5に試験装置の全体概要を正面図で例示する。この図において、試験タイヤ1は、リブ1aと周方向溝1bとを有したリブパターンで、符号Dはトレッドの溝深さを示している。試験装置は、以下に説明するタイヤ保持装置6と試験路2とを備えている。 Hereinafter, a test method and a test apparatus for a pneumatic tire according to the present invention will be described based on the embodiments shown in the drawings. FIG. 5 illustrates a general outline of the test apparatus in a front view. In this figure, the test tire 1 is a rib pattern having ribs 1a and circumferential grooves 1b, and the symbol D indicates the tread groove depth. The test apparatus includes a tire holding device 6 and a test path 2 described below.

タイヤ保持装置5は、保持アーム7にリム10に装着された所定の内圧の試験タイヤ1を転動可能に取り付けることができる構造となっている。保持アーム7は基台9に上下方向に移動可能に立設された支持柱8に取り付けられ、所定の高さで固定できる構造となっている。保持アーム7はアームの長手方向に移動可能となっており、長手方向に移動させることによって、試験タイヤ1の試験路2に対する接地位置を容易に変えて配置することができる。   The tire holding device 5 has a structure in which the test tire 1 having a predetermined internal pressure mounted on the rim 10 can be attached to the holding arm 7 so as to be able to roll. The holding arm 7 is attached to a support column 8 erected on the base 9 so as to be movable in the vertical direction, and has a structure that can be fixed at a predetermined height. The holding arm 7 is movable in the longitudinal direction of the arm, and by moving in the longitudinal direction, the contact position of the test tire 1 with respect to the test path 2 can be easily changed and arranged.

保持アーム6に取り付けられた試験タイヤ1の下方には試験路2が配置され、平面状の上段側路面4と下段側路面3とを有して、段差5が直線状に延設されている。この試験路2は円柱状体の外周面が試験路2となっているものであり、いわゆるドラム試験機の一種である。図5において、符号Hは段差の高さを示している。上段側路面4は着脱可能で、試験条件に応じて選択された段差の高さHを有する上段側路面4が下段側路面3の表面に装着固定されて、段差の高さHが変更できる構造となっている。   A test road 2 is arranged below the test tire 1 attached to the holding arm 6, and has a flat upper stage road surface 4 and a lower stage side road surface 3, and a step 5 extends linearly. . The test path 2 has a cylindrical body whose outer peripheral surface is the test path 2 and is a kind of so-called drum testing machine. In FIG. 5, the symbol H indicates the height of the step. The upper stage road surface 4 is detachable, and the upper stage side road surface 4 having a step height H selected according to the test condition is mounted and fixed on the surface of the lower stage side road surface 3 so that the step height H can be changed. It has become.

試験の実施に際して、まず、試験タイヤ1および試験路2のセッティングをする。試験タイヤ1は、試験路2の段差5が接地した際にトレッド幅内になるように位置決めされる。その後に支持柱8を下方移動させ、試験タイヤ1を少なくとも上段側路面4に接地させて所定の負荷荷重になる位置で移動を止めて試験タイヤ1の高さ位置が固定される。試験タイヤ1への荷重の負荷は、支持柱8を固定しておき、試験路2を上昇させて与えることもでき、支持柱8と試験路2の少なくとも一方が互いに近接する方向に移動して負荷を与えるようにすればよい。   In carrying out the test, first, the test tire 1 and the test road 2 are set. The test tire 1 is positioned so as to be within the tread width when the step 5 of the test road 2 contacts the ground. Thereafter, the support pillar 8 is moved downward, the test tire 1 is grounded at least on the upper stage road surface 4, and the movement is stopped at a position where a predetermined load is applied, so that the height position of the test tire 1 is fixed. The load applied to the test tire 1 can be given by fixing the support column 8 and raising the test path 2, and at least one of the support column 8 and the test path 2 moves in a direction close to each other. What is necessary is just to give load.

図1〜2に基づいて本発明の試験方法について説明する。図1に、タイヤ保持装置6に試験タイヤ1が保持されて、上記セッティングが完了した状態を平面方向で示す。図2には、図1における試験タイヤ1の接地状態を正面方向で拡大して示す。図示するように、試験タイヤ1のトレッドは、試験路2の上段側路面4のみに接地して下段側路面3には接地していない状態となっており、かつ、上段側路面4には、トレッドのタイヤ幅方向一端部1cのみが接地している。   The test method of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. FIG. 1 shows a state in which the test tire 1 is held by the tire holding device 6 and the setting is completed in a plane direction. FIG. 2 shows an enlarged view of the ground contact state of the test tire 1 in FIG. 1 in the front direction. As shown in the figure, the tread of the test tire 1 is in a state where it is grounded only on the upper road surface 4 of the test road 2 and is not grounded on the lower road surface 3, and the upper road surface 4 is Only one end 1c of the tread in the tire width direction is grounded.

この状態で図示しない駆動モータ等でドラム状の試験路2を回転させて、試験タイヤ1を段差5の延設方向に転動させる。   In this state, the drum-shaped test path 2 is rotated by a drive motor (not shown) to roll the test tire 1 in the extending direction of the step 5.

図2に示すように、上段側路面4に接地したトレッドの接地圧が下段側路面3側に比べて大幅に高くなり、タイヤ幅方向において段差5の最も近くに位置する周方向溝1bの溝底部に大きな歪が発生し、この部分にベルト層のワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックが発生し易い状態を作り出すことができる。   As shown in FIG. 2, the contact pressure of the tread that contacts the upper road surface 4 is significantly higher than that of the lower road surface 3, and the groove of the circumferential groove 1b located closest to the step 5 in the tire width direction. A large strain is generated at the bottom, and a state in which wire breakage and groove cracks of the belt layer are likely to occur can be created at this portion.

例えば、トレッドに5本のリブ1aを有する試験タイヤ1に規格最大荷重を負荷して、上段側路面4にトレッドの一端部1cとなる1本のリブ1aのみを接地させて、下段側路面3に接地させない状態とすると、この接地した1本のリブ1aには規格最大荷重の5倍が負荷されることになり、このリブ1aに隣接する周方向溝1bの溝底部に大きな歪を発生させることができる。   For example, a standard maximum load is applied to the test tire 1 having five ribs 1a on the tread, and only one rib 1a serving as one end portion 1c of the tread is grounded on the upper stage road surface 4 so that the lower stage road surface 3 In this state, the grounded single rib 1a is loaded with a load five times the standard maximum load, and a large strain is generated at the groove bottom of the circumferential groove 1b adjacent to the rib 1a. be able to.

以上のように、本発明の試験方法、試験装置によれば定常的に、ベルト層のワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックが発生し易い状態を作り出すことができ、市場で発生するベルト層のワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックの発生を効率よく再現することが可能となる。そして、発生した程度を把握することができる。   As described above, according to the test method and test apparatus of the present invention, it is possible to constantly create a state in which the wire breakage or groove crack of the belt layer is likely to occur, and the wire breakage or groove of the belt layer generated in the market. It is possible to efficiently reproduce the occurrence of cracks. And the extent which generate | occur | produced can be grasped | ascertained.

この実施形態では、タイヤ保持装置6を固定し、試験路2をドラム状にして回転させることによって、試験路2を段差5の延設方向に移動させているが、平板状の試験路2を固定して、タイヤ保持装置6を段差5の延設方向に移動させてもよい。   In this embodiment, the tire holding device 6 is fixed, and the test path 2 is rotated in a drum shape to move the test path 2 in the extending direction of the step 5, but the flat test path 2 is It may be fixed and the tire holding device 6 may be moved in the extending direction of the step 5.

また、この実施形態では、試験タイヤ1のトレッドを試験路2の上段側路面4のみに接地させて、より大きな歪を発生させる状態としているが、これに限定されず、下段側路面3に同時に接地させるようにしてもよい。   In this embodiment, the tread of the test tire 1 is grounded only on the upper road surface 4 of the test road 2 to generate a larger strain. However, the present invention is not limited to this. You may make it earth | ground.

さらに、上段側路面4にはトレッドの一端部のみを接地させて、より大きな歪を発生させる状態としているが、これに限定されず、トレッドの幅方向半分程度やそれ以上を上段側路面4に接地させてもよく、これらの条件については、試験条件の厳しさや評価したいトレッド位置に応じて適宜、決定することができる。   Further, only one end portion of the tread is grounded on the upper stage road surface 4 so as to generate a larger distortion. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and about half or more in the width direction of the tread or more is provided on the upper stage road surface 4. These conditions may be determined as appropriate according to the severity of the test conditions and the tread position to be evaluated.

試験路2の段差5の高さを、試験タイヤ1を試験路2に接地させた際にタイヤ幅方向において、段差5の最も近くに位置するトレッド溝の溝深さの50%以上とすると、ベルト層のワイヤ折れやグルーブクラックの発生をより促進させることができ、試験時間を大幅に短縮することができる。   When the height of the step 5 on the test road 2 is 50% or more of the groove depth of the tread groove located closest to the step 5 in the tire width direction when the test tire 1 is brought into contact with the test road 2, Generation of wire breakage and groove cracks in the belt layer can be further promoted, and the test time can be greatly shortened.

この段差5の高さは、所定荷重を負荷した状態で、試験タイヤ1のトレッドが上段側路面4のみに接地して、下段側路面3に接地しない高さであれば、その高さ以上にしても試験条件が段差5の高さによって厳しくなることはない。   The height of the step 5 is not less than the height of the test tire 1 when the tread of the test tire 1 is in contact with only the upper stage road surface 4 and is not in contact with the lower stage road surface 3 with a predetermined load applied. However, the test condition does not become severe depending on the height of the step 5.

試験路2の段差5は一つに限らず、図3に例示するように、複数としてもよく、これによって、同時に複数箇所の評価が可能となる。   The number of steps 5 in the test path 2 is not limited to one, and may be plural as illustrated in FIG. 3, thereby enabling evaluation of a plurality of locations at the same time.

また、段差5の幅方向断面形状は、上段側路面4が水平で矩形のものに限定されず、図4(a)に示す上段側路面4が水平で角部がアール取りされた形状、図4(b)に示す上段側路面4が傾斜した形状、図4(c)に示す上段側路面4が山状に突出した形状など、試験条件によってその他、様々な形状を採用することができる。   In addition, the cross-sectional shape in the width direction of the step 5 is not limited to a shape in which the upper-side road surface 4 is horizontal and rectangular, but the shape in which the upper-side road surface 4 shown in FIG. Various other shapes can be employed depending on the test conditions, such as a shape in which the upper-stage road surface 4 is inclined as shown in FIG. 4B and a shape in which the upper-stage road surface 4 is protruded in a mountain shape as shown in FIG.

段差5は、その延設方向に対しては、一定の高さであることに限定されず、連続的に高さが変化する形状でもよく、試験タイヤ1が転動する際に飛び跳ねることがない形状を採用することができる。延設長さも途中に切れ目がまったくないものに限定されず、試験タイヤ1の接地長よりも短ければ、切れ目があってもよい。   The step 5 is not limited to a constant height in the extending direction, and may have a shape whose height changes continuously, and does not jump when the test tire 1 rolls. Shape can be adopted. The extended length is not limited to the one having no cut at all, and the cut length may be provided as long as it is shorter than the contact length of the test tire 1.

試験路2に段差5ではなく、タイヤ幅方向に傾斜する傾斜面を設けて試験することもでき、縦断面形状を平行四辺形とした、いわゆるワブリングドラムの表面に試験タイヤ1を接地させた状態で転動させて試験してもよい。   The test road 2 can be tested by providing an inclined surface inclined in the tire width direction instead of the step 5, and the test tire 1 is grounded on the surface of a so-called wobbling drum whose longitudinal cross-sectional shape is a parallelogram. You may test by rolling in a state.

タイヤサイズが11R22.5 14PR(規格最大荷重26.7kN、規格最大空気圧700kPa)で、溝深さD15mmのリブパターンの空気入りタイヤを用いて、ドラム表面に段差を設けた外径1707mmのドラム試験機において、段差の上段側路面にはトレッドの一端部の1本のリブのみを接地させて、負荷荷重を規格最大荷重、空気圧を規格最大空気圧、走行速度を45km/hにしたことを共通条件として、段差の高さHのみを変えてH/Dの値を表1に示すように4通り(実施例1〜4)に変えて、トレッドの下段側路面への接地状態を変化させて、ベルト層のワイヤ折れが発生するまでの走行距離を測定した。この測定は、2,000km走行毎にX線検査によってワイヤ折れの有無を確認したもので、その結果を表1に示す。   Drum test with an outer diameter of 1707 mm, with a tire size of 11R22.5 14PR (standard maximum load 26.7 kN, standard maximum air pressure 700 kPa) and a rib pattern pneumatic tire with a groove depth D15 mm and a step on the drum surface The common condition is that only one rib at one end of the tread is grounded to the upper road surface of the step, the load load is the standard maximum load, the air pressure is the standard maximum air pressure, and the traveling speed is 45 km / h. And changing only the height H of the step and changing the value of H / D to four ways (Examples 1 to 4) as shown in Table 1, changing the ground contact state on the lower road surface of the tread, The travel distance until the wire breakage of the belt layer occurred was measured. In this measurement, the presence or absence of wire breakage was confirmed by X-ray inspection every 2,000 km traveling, and the results are shown in Table 1.

尚、この同仕様の試験タイヤは、市場での実車走行試験では、80,000km走行時点で、トレッド端部のベルト層のワイヤ折れが発生している(比較例)。   In the test tire of the same specification, in the actual vehicle running test in the market, wire breakage of the belt layer at the tread end occurs at the time of running 80,000 km (comparative example).

Figure 0004561367
Figure 0004561367

実施例1〜4のすべてにおいて、トレッド端部のベルト層のワイヤ折れを再現することができ、試験した段差高さの範囲では、段差高さが大きいほど条件が厳しくなり、ワイヤ折れを発生させる走行距離を短縮可能であることが確認できた。特に、実施例2〜4においては、市場での実車走行試験よりも大幅に走行距離の短縮が可能で、効率よく市場で発生するワイヤ折れを再現して、時間およびコストを削減ができることが確認できた。
実施例1においては、実車走行試験よりも走行距離が長くなっているが、室内試験でワイヤ折れの再現が可能であり、無人で連続走行できるので、実車走行試験よりも試験時間短縮およびコスト削減が可能となり効率的である。
In all of Examples 1 to 4, the wire breakage of the belt layer at the end of the tread can be reproduced. In the range of the step height tested, the condition becomes severer as the step height increases, and the wire breakage occurs. It was confirmed that the mileage could be shortened. In particular, in Examples 2 to 4, it was confirmed that the mileage could be significantly shortened compared to actual vehicle running tests in the market, and that wire breakage that occurred in the market could be efficiently reproduced to save time and cost. did it.
In the first embodiment, the travel distance is longer than that of the actual vehicle running test, but it is possible to reproduce wire breakage in the indoor test, and it is possible to continuously run unattended. Therefore, the test time and cost can be reduced compared to the actual vehicle running test. Is possible and efficient.

本発明の試験方法を実施している状態を例示する平面図である。It is a top view which illustrates the state which is implementing the test method of the present invention. 図1における試験タイヤの接地状態を示す正面拡大図である。It is a front enlarged view which shows the grounding state of the test tire in FIG. 本発明に係る試験路の別の例を示す正面図である。It is a front view which shows another example of the test path which concerns on this invention. 本発明に係る試験路の段差の形状の別の例を示す幅方向断面図である。It is width direction sectional drawing which shows another example of the shape of the level | step difference of the test path which concerns on this invention. 本発明の試験装置を例示する正面図である。It is a front view which illustrates the test device of the present invention.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 試験タイヤ 1a リブ 1b 周方向溝 1c トレッドの一端部
2 試験路
3 下段側路面
4 上段側路面
5 段差
6 タイヤ保持装置
7 保持アーム
8 支持柱
9 基台
10 リム
D トレッド溝深さ
H 段差高さ
1 Test Tire 1a Rib 1b Circumferential Groove 1c One End of Tread 2 Test Path
3 Lower road surface 4 Upper road surface 5 Step 6 Tire holding device 7 Holding arm 8 Support column 9 Base 10 Rim D Tread groove depth H Step height

Claims (6)

延設された段差を有する試験路で、リム組みして所定の内圧にした試験タイヤを、前記段差がトレッド幅内に位置するように配置して、所定の荷重を負荷してトレッドを前記試験路の少なくとも上段側路面に接地させて、前記段差の延設方向に転動させる空気入りタイヤの試験方法。   A test road having an extended step and a rim assembled to a predetermined internal pressure is placed so that the step is positioned within the tread width, and a predetermined load is applied to test the tread. A test method for a pneumatic tire, which is brought into contact with at least an upper road surface of a road and rolls in the extending direction of the step. 前記段差の高さを、タイヤ幅方向において前記段差の最も近くに位置するトレッド溝の溝深さの50%以上とする請求項1に記載の空気入りタイヤの試験方法。   The method for testing a pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein the height of the step is 50% or more of the groove depth of the tread groove located closest to the step in the tire width direction. 前記試験タイヤのトレッドを前記試験路の上段側路面のみに接地させる請求項1または2に記載の空気入りタイヤの試験方法。   The test method for a pneumatic tire according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the tread of the test tire is grounded only on an upper road surface of the test road. 前記試験路の上段側路面には、前記試験タイヤのトレッドのタイヤ幅方向一端部のみを接地させる請求項1〜3のいずれかに記載の空気入りタイヤの試験方法。   The method for testing a pneumatic tire according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein only one end portion in the tire width direction of the tread of the test tire is grounded on an upper stage side surface of the test road. リム組みした試験タイヤを転動可能に保持するタイヤ保持装置と、延設された段差を有する試験路とを備え、前記タイヤ保持装置と前記試験路との少なくとも一方を、前記タイヤ保持装置が保持した試験タイヤのトレッドを前記試験路に接地させる方向に移動可能として、該方向に荷重を負荷できるようにするとともに、タイヤ幅方向に移動して試験タイヤの接地位置を調節可能とし、前記タイヤ保持装置と前記試験路との少なくとも一方を、前記段差の延設方向に移動可能とする空気入りタイヤの試験装置。   A tire holding device that holds a test tire assembled with a rim in a rollable manner and a test road having an extended step, and the tire holding device holds at least one of the tire holding device and the test road. The test tire tread can be moved in the direction in which the tread is brought into contact with the test road so that a load can be applied in the direction, and the test tire can be moved in the tire width direction to adjust the contact position of the test tire. A test apparatus for a pneumatic tire, wherein at least one of the apparatus and the test road is movable in an extending direction of the step. 前記段差の高さを変更可能とした請求項5に記載の空気入りタイヤの試験装置。
The pneumatic tire testing device according to claim 5, wherein the height of the step can be changed.
JP2005004701A 2005-01-12 2005-01-12 Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus Expired - Fee Related JP4561367B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005004701A JP4561367B2 (en) 2005-01-12 2005-01-12 Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005004701A JP4561367B2 (en) 2005-01-12 2005-01-12 Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006194652A JP2006194652A (en) 2006-07-27
JP4561367B2 true JP4561367B2 (en) 2010-10-13

Family

ID=36800861

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2005004701A Expired - Fee Related JP4561367B2 (en) 2005-01-12 2005-01-12 Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4561367B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4561372B2 (en) * 2005-01-17 2010-10-13 横浜ゴム株式会社 Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus
JP5467091B2 (en) * 2011-10-19 2014-04-09 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Evaluation method of tire performance
JP7155741B2 (en) * 2018-08-17 2022-10-19 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Tire testing method and tire testing apparatus

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4028937A (en) * 1972-09-11 1977-06-14 The General Tire & Rubber Company Nondestructive testing of tire wear
US5289718A (en) * 1992-12-10 1994-03-01 Ford Motor Company Apparatus and method for measuring tire force
JPH0736038U (en) * 1993-12-20 1995-07-04 横浜ゴム株式会社 Tire durability evaluation device
US5610329A (en) * 1995-03-10 1997-03-11 The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Low-cost runout sensor with high frequency response and negligible stiction in the direction of travel
JP2000227387A (en) * 1999-02-08 2000-08-15 Ohtsu Tire & Rubber Co Ltd :The Rubber destructive testing machine
US6439043B1 (en) * 2000-08-30 2002-08-27 Daimlerchrysler Corporation Static tire test fixture and related method

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4028937A (en) * 1972-09-11 1977-06-14 The General Tire & Rubber Company Nondestructive testing of tire wear
US5289718A (en) * 1992-12-10 1994-03-01 Ford Motor Company Apparatus and method for measuring tire force
JPH0736038U (en) * 1993-12-20 1995-07-04 横浜ゴム株式会社 Tire durability evaluation device
US5610329A (en) * 1995-03-10 1997-03-11 The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Low-cost runout sensor with high frequency response and negligible stiction in the direction of travel
JP2000227387A (en) * 1999-02-08 2000-08-15 Ohtsu Tire & Rubber Co Ltd :The Rubber destructive testing machine
US6439043B1 (en) * 2000-08-30 2002-08-27 Daimlerchrysler Corporation Static tire test fixture and related method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2006194652A (en) 2006-07-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3049239B1 (en) Correction of localized tire surface anomalies
CN101920637A (en) Pneumatic tire for running on rough terrain
JP5530421B2 (en) Tire noise test method
JP4561367B2 (en) Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus
JP5727887B2 (en) Evaluation method of tire turning noise performance
JP5707923B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP6743533B2 (en) Tire test method
CN108469345B (en) Vehicle turning capacity testing method and obstacle device
JP2007003218A (en) Tire characteristic measuring device and tire characteristics measuring method
JP2011073511A (en) Pneumatic tire
KR20050120262A (en) Dynamic impact load addition and impact tester of tire tread
JP4163099B2 (en) Pneumatic tire breaker impact test method
JP4561372B2 (en) Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus
JP7225658B2 (en) Tire test method
CN102438846B (en) Tire
JP4401182B2 (en) Method and apparatus for forming scratches on tire treads
JP7275945B2 (en) Spike tire evaluation method and evaluation device
CN211740188U (en) Truck frame local deformation characteristic test evaluation device
JP2008285056A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP7155741B2 (en) Tire testing method and tire testing apparatus
KR102589846B1 (en) Tire stiffness measuring device
JP6578957B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP6496162B2 (en) Tire vibration characteristics evaluation method
JP5462125B2 (en) Pattern noise simulation apparatus and pattern noise simulation method
JP2005263222A (en) Tire performance simulation method, device and recording medium

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20071220

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20091217

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20100706

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20100719

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130806

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4561367

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130806

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130806

Year of fee payment: 3

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees