JP2895275B2 - Method for evaluating roller transportability of metal plate - Google Patents
Method for evaluating roller transportability of metal plateInfo
- Publication number
- JP2895275B2 JP2895275B2 JP23127291A JP23127291A JP2895275B2 JP 2895275 B2 JP2895275 B2 JP 2895275B2 JP 23127291 A JP23127291 A JP 23127291A JP 23127291 A JP23127291 A JP 23127291A JP 2895275 B2 JP2895275 B2 JP 2895275B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- transportability
- metal plate
- peak
- roller
- slip
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Landscapes
- Length Measuring Devices With Unspecified Measuring Means (AREA)
- Rollers For Roller Conveyors For Transfer (AREA)
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、剪断やパンチ加工,プ
レス加工などに供される金属板のローラ搬送性の評価方
法に関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the roller transportability of a metal plate subjected to shearing, punching, pressing and the like.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】金属板たとえば冷延鋼板は従来から自動
車のボデイ外板や家電製品などとして広く使用されてい
るが、近年、特に自動車のボデイ外板用には塗装後の鮮
映性が強く要求され、さらに防錆上の見地から溶融亜鉛
めっき鋼板などの表面処理鋼板を利用する割合が急速に
増加しており、表面処理鋼板における塗装後鮮映性とプ
レス成形性の両立が課題となっている。2. Description of the Related Art Metal sheets such as cold-rolled steel sheets have been widely used as body panels for automobiles and household electric appliances, but recently, especially for body panels of automobiles, the sharpness after painting is strong. The use of surface-treated steel sheets, such as hot-dip galvanized steel sheets, is rapidly increasing from the point of view of rust prevention, and the balance between sharpness after painting and press formability of surface-treated steel sheets has become an issue. ing.
【0003】ところで、このような表面処理鋼板の表面
性状は、たとえば表面粗さ,表面うねり,周波数解析な
どによる鋼板表面の振幅レベルの評価法(JIS B0601 参
照)や、あるいは接触比,負荷曲線,振幅確立分布曲線
などによる鋼板表面の断面形状評価法によって評価する
のが一般的である。これら従来の評価法はすべて鋼板の
加工性や塗装性あるいは塗装後の仕上がり状態に関連づ
けられたものである。Incidentally, the surface properties of such a surface-treated steel sheet are evaluated, for example, by a method of evaluating the amplitude level of the steel sheet surface by surface roughness, surface waviness, frequency analysis or the like (see JIS B0601), a contact ratio, a load curve, or the like. Generally, it is evaluated by a cross-sectional shape evaluation method of the steel sheet surface using an amplitude establishment distribution curve or the like. These conventional evaluation methods are all related to the workability and paintability of the steel sheet or the finished state after painting.
【0004】[0004]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、上記し
た表面処理鋼板をユーザ側の高度に自動化された自動車
工場などにおいてはプレス加工その他の工程で素材鋼板
をたとえば長さが500 〜1000mmのブランキング材として
ローラを用いて搬送することが多いのであるが、原板に
ある特定の粗面化処理を施した溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板の場
合は、往々にしてスリップが発生して円滑に搬送するこ
とができず、鋼板のハンドリングに支障を来し、生産性
を損なうという問題があった。However, in a highly automated automobile factory or the like on the user side, the above-mentioned surface-treated steel sheet is subjected to press working or other processes to cut the blank steel sheet having a length of, for example, 500 to 1000 mm. Although it is often transported using rollers, in the case of a hot-dip galvanized steel sheet that has been subjected to a specific roughening treatment on the original sheet, slip often occurs and it can not be transported smoothly However, there is a problem that the handling of the steel sheet is hindered and the productivity is impaired.
【0005】そこで、鋼板の表面粗度とスリップの発生
とは密接な関係があると推察して、上記した従来の鋼板
表面性状評価法によってそれらの関係を調査してみた
が、いずれの方法を適用しても正確な対応がとれないこ
とが判明した。すなわち、表1は規格がGAである溶融
亜鉛めっき鋼板の場合について3次元表面粗さSRa と
スリップの発生の関係を例示したものであるが、この3
次元表面粗さではスリップの発生を予測することが困難
であることがわかる。[0005] Then, it was presumed that there was a close relationship between the surface roughness of the steel sheet and the occurrence of slip, and the relationship was examined by the above-described conventional steel sheet surface property evaluation method. It turned out that even if applied, an accurate response could not be taken. That is, Table 1 illustrates the relationship between the three-dimensional surface roughness SRa and the occurrence of slip in the case of a hot-dip galvanized steel sheet whose standard is GA.
It can be seen that it is difficult to predict the occurrence of slip with the dimensional surface roughness.
【0006】[0006]
【表1】 [Table 1]
【0007】本発明は、上記のような課題を解決すべく
してなされたものであって、金属板をローラで搬送する
際のスリップの発生の可能性を評価するのに適した方法
を提供することを目的とする。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made to solve the above problems, and provides a method suitable for evaluating the possibility of occurrence of slip when a metal plate is transported by rollers. The purpose is to:
【0008】本発明は、金属板をローラで搬送する際の
搬送性を評価する方法であって、金属板表面の表面形状
を所定の長さにわたって測定して断面曲線を作成する工
程と、この断面曲線を最高山頂部から最低谷底部までの
間の各高さの値から振幅確率密度分布を作成する工程
と、この振幅確率密度分布のピークに対応するレベル値
を求める工程と、このピークに対応するレベル値と前記
断面曲線の最高山頂部から最低谷底部間での振幅値との
比から搬送性指数を求める工程と、該搬送性指数と予め
設定しておいた所定の基準値とを比較してスリップ発生
有無を評価する工程と、からなることを特徴とする金属
板のローラ搬送性の評価方法である。更に、上記におい
て、前記振幅確率密度分布のピークに対応するレベル値
と最高山頂部までのレベル差をHu とし、このピークに
対応するレベル値と最低谷底部までのレベル差をHd と
して、搬送性指数Ho を Ho ={Hu /(Hu +Hd )}×100 % で定義し、このHo と予め設定しておいた所定の基準値
Hs とを比較して、 Ho <Hs のときにスリップ発生ありと評価するようにしたことを
特徴とする。 [0008] The present invention provides a method of assessing the transportability when conveying a metal plate with a roller, a step of creating a measured and sectional curve of the surface shape of the metal plate surface over a predetermined length, A step of creating an amplitude probability density distribution from the height of the section curve from the highest peak to the lowest valley, and a step of obtaining a level value corresponding to the peak of the amplitude probability density distribution When a step of obtaining a transport index from the ratio of the amplitude values between the lowest valley portion from highest crest level value and the cross section curve corresponding to this peak, in advance with the conveyor index
Slip occurs by comparing with the set reference value
And a step of evaluating the presence / absence of the metal plate. In addition, the above smell
A level value corresponding to the peak of the amplitude probability density distribution
The difference between the level and the highest peak is assumed to be Hu.
The level difference between the corresponding level value and the lowest valley bottom is denoted by Hd.
Then, the transportability index Ho is defined as Ho = {Hu / (Hu + Hd)} × 100% , and this Ho and a predetermined reference value set in advance
Hs was compared with that of Ho <Hs , and it was evaluated that slip occurred.
Features.
【0009】[0009]
【作 用】図1は本発明に用いる表面粗度測定装置の構
成の一例を示す概要図であり、1は被測定材である鋼
板、2はたとえばレーザビーム式の表面粗度センサ、3
は表面粗度測定演算装置、4は演算結果表示装置であ
る。表面粗度センサ2で検出された鋼板1の表面粗さ信
号は表面粗度測定演算装置3に入力されて、表面粗度測
定演算装置3において以下のような手順で処理がなさ
れ、その結果を演算結果表示装置4に表示する。 ま
ず、鋼板表面の表面形状を所定の長さL(mm)にわたっ
て測定して、図2(a) に示すような断面曲線Aを作成す
る。 この断面曲線Aにおいて、最高山頂部Pから最
低谷底部Vまでの切断レベルをとったとき、図2(b) に
示すように断面曲線がその切断レベルと等しくなる確率
をグラフにして振幅確率密度分布曲線Bとして作成す
る。 この振幅確率密度分布曲線Bのピーク値Cと最
高山頂部Pまでの切断レベル差Hu を求める。 この
切断レベル差Hu と振幅確率密度分布の最大高さRmax
(=Hu +Hd)の比から搬送性指数Ho を下記(1) 式
で求める。FIG. 1 is a schematic view showing an example of the configuration of a surface roughness measuring device used in the present invention, wherein 1 is a steel plate as a material to be measured, 2 is a laser beam type surface roughness sensor, for example.
Denotes a surface roughness measurement calculation device, and 4 denotes a calculation result display device. The surface roughness signal of the steel sheet 1 detected by the surface roughness sensor 2 is input to the surface roughness measuring and calculating device 3 and processed by the surface roughness measuring and calculating device 3 in the following procedure. The result is displayed on the calculation result display device 4. First, by measuring the surface shape of the steel sheet surface over a predetermined length L (mm), to create a cross-sectional curve A, as shown in FIG. 2 (a). In this section curve A, when the cutting level from the highest peak P to the lowest valley V is taken, the probability that the section curve becomes equal to the cutting level as shown in FIG. It is created as a distribution curve B. A cutting level difference Hu between the peak value C of the amplitude probability density distribution curve B and the highest peak P is obtained. This cutting level difference Hu and the maximum height Rmax of the amplitude probability density distribution
From the ratio (= Hu + Hd), the transportability index Ho is determined by the following equation (1).
【0010】 Ho ={Hu /(Hu +Hd )}×100 (%) ────────(1) 搬送性指数Ho を予め設定しておいた所定の基準値
Hs と比較してスリップ発生の有無を判定する。 ここで、上記した搬送性指数Ho について補足すると、
まず搬送性指数Ho が小であるということは、図3(a)
に示すように振幅確率密度分布曲線Bのピーク値Cの切
断レベルが高い状態であるから、図3(b) に示すように
深い谷部と高原状の地形を表し、この高原における小さ
いピークMは容易に磨滅して、ローラに接する面は滑ら
かな平面となり、スリップが生じ易くなる。とくに溶融
亜鉛めっき鋼板のように軟らかい表面ではこの傾向は顕
著である。Ho = {Hu / (Hu + Hd)} × 100 (%) (1) The slip index is compared by comparing the transportability index Ho with a preset reference value Hs. The presence or absence of occurrence is determined. Here, supplementing the transportability index Ho described above,
First, the fact that the transportability index Ho is small means that FIG. 3 (a)
Since the cutting level of the peak value C of the amplitude probability density distribution curve B is high as shown in FIG. 3, a deep valley and a plateau-like topography are shown as shown in FIG. Is easily worn away, the surface in contact with the roller becomes a smooth flat surface, and slip tends to occur. This tendency is remarkable especially on a soft surface such as a hot-dip galvanized steel sheet.
【0011】一方、搬送性指数Ho が大であるというこ
とは、図4(a) に示すようにピーク値Cの切断レベルが
低い状態であるから、図4(b) に示すように峻険な高い
山状を有する地形を表し、この山における高いピークN
はローラに接しても簡単には消滅せず、摩擦力を維持す
るので搬送性がよい。ただし、搬送性指数Ho を大きく
することは、一般的に粗面化加工費を高めることとな
り、かつ塗装表面の仕上がり品質にも悪影響を及ぼすの
で、ローラ搬送条件に合わせて必要なHo を付与するよ
うにするのがよい。On the other hand, when the transportability index Ho is large, the cutting level of the peak value C is low as shown in FIG. 4A, and therefore, the steepness as shown in FIG. Represents a terrain with a high mountain, high peak N in this mountain
Does not disappear easily even when it comes into contact with the rollers, and maintains a frictional force, so that it has good transportability. However, increasing the transportability index Ho generally increases the surface roughening cost and adversely affects the finish quality of the painted surface. Therefore, the necessary Ho is added in accordance with the roller transport conditions. It is better to do so.
【0012】[0012]
【実施例】以下に、本発明の実施例について説明する。
被測定材として、規格;GA材で板厚;1.6 mm×板幅;
1219mmのコイルとされる溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板10コイルに
ついて、本発明方法を用いて搬送性指数Ho の演算を行
った結果と、その後ブランキング材としてローラで搬送
したときのスリップの発生の有無について表2に示し
た。ここで、○印は“スリップ発生なし”、△印は“ス
リップ部分発生”、×印は“スリップ発生あり”をそれ
ぞれ示す。なお、比較のために、従来の3次元表面粗さ
SRaの測定を行い、その測定値を同表に併せて示し
た。Embodiments of the present invention will be described below.
As the material to be measured, standard; GA material thickness; 1.6 mm x width;
Table 10 shows the results of calculating the transportability index Ho by using the method of the present invention for 10 coils of hot-dip galvanized steel sheet, which are 1219 mm coils, and whether or not slippage occurs when the coil is subsequently transported as a blanking material by rollers. 2 is shown. Here, ○ indicates “no occurrence of slip”, Δ indicates “occurrence of slip”, and x indicates “occurrence of slip”. For comparison, the conventional three-dimensional surface roughness SRa was measured, and the measured values are also shown in the same table.
【0013】[0013]
【表2】 [Table 2]
【0014】この表2の結果を搬送性指数と対応させて
それぞれ図5と図6に示した。ここで、スリップ発生指
数“0”はスリップ発生なし、“1”はスリップ部分発
生、“2”はスリップ発生ありをそれぞれ意味する。こ
れらの図を比較してわかるように、従来の3次元表面粗
さ(SRa)の場合は搬送性指数と対応させて判定する
のが困難であるが、本発明の搬送性指数Hoについては2
4〜26%を境にして24%未満ではスリップ発生し、26%
超ではスリップ発生なしであることが明らかである。こ
れゆえ、上記の鋼板の場合は搬送性指数の基準値Hs を
24〜26%の範囲に設定するようにすれば、スリップの発
生の有無を確実に判定することが可能である。The results in Table 2 are shown in FIGS. 5 and 6 in correspondence with the transportability index. Here, the slip occurrence index “0” means no slip occurrence, “1” means slip portion occurrence, and “2” means slip occurrence. As can be seen from comparison of these figures, it is difficult to determine the conventional three-dimensional surface roughness (SRa) in correspondence with the transportability index, but the transportability index Ho of the present invention is 2.
If it is less than 24% between 4 and 26%, slip occurs and 26%
It is clear that there is no occurrence of slip in the case of exceeding. Therefore, in the case of the above steel sheet, the reference value Hs of the transportability index is
If it is set in the range of 24 to 26%, it is possible to reliably determine whether or not a slip has occurred.
【0015】[0015]
【発明の効果】以上説明したように本発明によれば、振
幅確率密度分布のピークに対応するレベル値を求めて、
このピークに対応するレベル値と断面曲線の最高山頂部
から最低谷底部間での振幅値との比から搬送性指数を求
めるようにしたので、ローラの搬送性について確度の高
い判定を行うことができ、スリップ発生の有無を確実に
予測できるようになり、プレス加工ラインの生産性の向
上に寄与する。As described above, according to the present invention, the level value corresponding to the peak of the amplitude probability density distribution is obtained,
Highest peaks of the level value and a sectional curve corresponding to this peak
From the minimum valley bottom to determine the transportability index from the ratio of the amplitude value between the lowest valley bottom, it is possible to make a highly accurate determination of the transportability of the roller, to ensure the presence or absence of slip
It is possible to predict and contribute to the improvement of the productivity of the press processing line.
【図1】本発明に用いる表面粗度測定装置の構成の一例
を示す概要図である。FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a configuration of a surface roughness measuring device used in the present invention.
【図2】(a) 断面曲線、(b) 振幅確率密度分布曲線の特
性図である。FIGS. 2A and 2B are characteristic diagrams of (a) a sectional curve and (b) an amplitude probability density distribution curve.
【図3】搬送性指数Ho が小のときの(a) 振幅確率密度
分布曲線と(b) 断面曲線の説明図である。FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of (a) an amplitude probability density distribution curve and (b) a cross-sectional curve when the transportability index Ho is small.
【図4】搬送性指数Ho が大のときの(a) 振幅確率密度
分布曲線と(b) 断面曲線の説明図である。FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram of (a) an amplitude probability density distribution curve and (b) a cross-sectional curve when the transportability index Ho is large.
【図5】搬送性指数Ho とスリップ発生指数の関係を示
す特性図である。FIG. 5 is a characteristic diagram showing a relationship between a transportability index Ho and a slip occurrence index.
【図6】3次元表面粗さSRaとスリップ発生指数の関
係を示す特性図である。FIG. 6 is a characteristic diagram showing a relationship between a three-dimensional surface roughness SRa and a slip occurrence index.
1 鋼板 2 表面粗度センサ 3 表面粗度測定演算装置 4 演算結果表示装置 DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Steel plate 2 Surface roughness sensor 3 Surface roughness measurement calculation device 4 Calculation result display device
───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (56)参考文献 特開 昭52−129545(JP,A) 特開 平3−165210(JP,A) 特開 平3−291511(JP,A) 実開 平2−129810(JP,U) (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.6,DB名) G01B 21/30 102 B65G 13/00 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continuation of the front page (56) References JP-A-52-129545 (JP, A) JP-A-3-165210 (JP, A) JP-A-3-291511 (JP, A) 129810 (JP, U) (58) Fields investigated (Int. Cl. 6 , DB name) G01B 21/30 102 B65G 13/00
Claims (2)
評価する方法であって、金属板表面の表面形状を所定の
長さにわたって測定して断面曲線を作成する工程と、こ
の断面曲線を最高山頂部から最低谷底部までの間の各高
さの値から振幅確率密度分布を作成する工程と、この振
幅確率密度分布のピークに対応するレベル値を求める工
程と、このピークに対応するレベル値と前記断面曲線の
最高山頂部から最低谷底部間での振幅値との比から搬送
性指数を求める工程と、該搬送性指数と予め設定してお
いた所定の基準値とを比較してスリップ発生有無を評価
する工程と、からなることを特徴とする金属板のローラ
搬送性の評価方法。1. A method of evaluating the transfer properties when transporting a metal plate with a roller, comprising the steps of creating a profile curve by measuring the surface shape of the metal plate surface over a predetermined length, the cross-section A step of creating an amplitude probability density distribution from a value of each height between the highest peak and the lowest valley of the curve, a step of obtaining a level value corresponding to a peak of the amplitude probability density distribution, Level value and the cross-sectional curve
Calculating the transportability index from the ratio of the amplitude value between the highest peak and the lowest valley , and setting the transportability index in advance.
Evaluate the occurrence of slip by comparing with the specified reference value
A method of evaluating roller transportability of a metal plate, comprising:
の評価方法であって、前記振幅確率密度分布のピークにEvaluation method, the peak of the amplitude probability density distribution
対応するレベル値と最高山頂部までのレベル差をHu とHu is the level difference between the corresponding level value and the highest peak.
し、このピークに対応するレベル値と最低谷底部までのAnd the level value corresponding to this peak and the lowest valley bottom
レベル差をHd として、搬送性指数Ho をAssuming that the level difference is Hd, the transportability index Ho is Ho ={Hu /(Hu +Hd )}×100 %Ho = {Hu / (Hu + Hd)} × 100% で定義し、Defined by このHo と予め設定しておいた所定の基準値Hs とを比This Ho is compared with a predetermined reference value Hs set in advance.
較して、In comparison, Ho <HsHo <Hs のときにスリップ発生ありと評価するようにしたことをWas evaluated as having a slip when
特徴とする金属板のローラ搬送性の評価方法。Characteristic evaluation method of roller transportability of metal plate.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP23127291A JP2895275B2 (en) | 1991-09-11 | 1991-09-11 | Method for evaluating roller transportability of metal plate |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP23127291A JP2895275B2 (en) | 1991-09-11 | 1991-09-11 | Method for evaluating roller transportability of metal plate |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH0571953A JPH0571953A (en) | 1993-03-23 |
JP2895275B2 true JP2895275B2 (en) | 1999-05-24 |
Family
ID=16921005
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP23127291A Expired - Fee Related JP2895275B2 (en) | 1991-09-11 | 1991-09-11 | Method for evaluating roller transportability of metal plate |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP2895275B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3500316B2 (en) * | 1998-11-27 | 2004-02-23 | 株式会社ミツトヨ | Three-dimensional data analysis method and device |
JP6864311B2 (en) * | 2015-11-04 | 2021-04-28 | 学校法人東京理科大学 | Surface roughness evaluation device and surface roughness evaluation method |
US10843341B2 (en) * | 2017-05-05 | 2020-11-24 | Brooks Automation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for health assessment of a transport apparatus |
-
1991
- 1991-09-11 JP JP23127291A patent/JP2895275B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JPH0571953A (en) | 1993-03-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5483750A (en) | Springback angle measuring instrument for V-bending | |
US20220305538A1 (en) | Sheet steel having a deterministic surface structure | |
JP2704070B2 (en) | Alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet with excellent press mold sliding properties | |
JP2895275B2 (en) | Method for evaluating roller transportability of metal plate | |
Devenpeck et al. | Strip-drawing experiments with a sigmoidal die profile | |
JP2003183801A (en) | Galvannealed steel sheet and manufacturing method therefor | |
JP2000193450A (en) | Evaluating method for press forming characteristics of steel sheet | |
Garza et al. | The effect of ζ-phase on the frictional behavior of galvannealed interstitial free sheet steels | |
Granzow | Sheet formability of steels | |
CN213350348U (en) | Detection mechanism with self-resetting function | |
JP2530908B2 (en) | Steel plate with excellent paint clarity | |
JPH08174007A (en) | Steel sheet having excellent image clarity after painting and method for producing the same | |
JP2509651B2 (en) | Cold rolled steel sheet for press with good lubricity | |
JPS61186110A (en) | Aluminum and aluminum alloy sheet for deep drawing | |
JP3903835B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of plated steel sheet | |
JP2001288549A (en) | Manufacturing method of cold rolled steel plate excellent in press forming property and plated steel plate | |
JP3592840B2 (en) | Stainless steel sheet for forming | |
JP2004148386A (en) | Aluminum alloy plate having excellent scratch resistance | |
JP2001247950A (en) | Hot dip galvanized steel sheet excellent in press formability and its production method | |
WO2025004910A1 (en) | Method for manufacturing metal processed article, and metal processed article | |
RU2133460C1 (en) | Process of test and evaluation of efficiency of technological lubricants | |
SU1555011A1 (en) | Method of straightening strips | |
JP2798008B2 (en) | Roll forming method | |
Autio et al. | Optimizing Press Performance for Difficult Automotive Stampings | |
HIRAIwA et al. | Investigation into Deep Drawing of the Square Cup by Cladding |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080305 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database) |
Year of fee payment: 10 Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090305 |
|
LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |