JP2017077031A - Multi-level self-organizing network coordination - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide means for realizing multi-level self-organizing network coordination including self-organizing network coordination procedures.SOLUTION: Such means exemplarily comprises: communicating of a notification for self-organizing network coordination, which notifies an action of at least one self-organizing network function at lower management level, from the lower management level of a self-organizing network to higher management level of the self-organizing network, before the action is actually performed or after the action has actually been performed; and coordinating of the notified action with respect to the self-organizing network coordination at the higher management level.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 2

Description

  The present invention relates to MULTI-LEVEL SELF-ORGANIZING NETWORK COORDINATION. More particularly, the invention relates to means (methods, apparatus and computer program products) for realizing, for example, multi-level self-organizing network coordination.

  The present invention basically relates to a self-organizing network (SON), and more particularly to self-organizing network (SON) coordination.

  Such SON coordination is particularly applicable to multi-vendor / release networks that are typically organized into multiple domains to be operated and managed. Network elements of the same vendor / release are typically grouped into the same domain (s) so that they can be efficiently operated and managed by the network operator. The same principle applies to heterogeneous networks consisting of multiple radio access technologies (RATs) and multiple cell layers within those RATs, grouping network elements of the same RAT / layer into the same domain (s), Such SON adjustment is also applicable.

  For example, due to the organization principle applicable to multi-vendor / release networks and heterogeneous networks, the SON function of the network is not only located in different domains but also at different levels of OSS / OAM hierarchy. That is, some of the SON functions are located in the network element (NE) and some are located in the domain manager (DM) or element manager (EM), while others are located in the network manager (NM). ).

  Such multi-level and multi-domain distribution of SON functions imposes the challenge of achieving proper and effective SON coordination between those SON functions. In this regard, it is required to allow SON coordination to take into account level crossings and domain cross interdependencies (such as dependencies or conflicts) between each SON function.

  The need for such proper and effective SON coordination includes the ability to coordinate SON coordination between domains, ie, NE / EM / DM level functions in one domain and other NE / EM / DM level functions in another domain; The present invention relates to the ability to adjust the SON between management levels, that is, the adjustment of the NE / EM / DM level function and the NM level function.

  In particular, in current communication systems, at least the level crossing SON adjustment capability is not available.

  Therefore, it is desirable to be able to implement multi-level self-organizing network coordination that facilitates proper and effective SON coordination across different management levels and domains.

  Various exemplary embodiments of the present invention aim to address at least some of the issues and / or problems and drawbacks described above.

  Various aspects of the exemplary embodiments of the invention are defined in the claims.

  In accordance with exemplary aspects of the present invention, self-organizing network coordination notifications that notify actions of at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level are self-organized from a low management level of the self-organizing network. A method is provided that includes publishing to a higher management level of the network.

  In accordance with exemplary aspects of the present invention, self-organizing network coordination notifications that notify actions of at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level are self-organized from a low management level of the self-organizing network. A method is provided that includes receiving at a high management level of the network and coordinating the notified action with respect to self-organizing network coordination at the high management level.

  According to an exemplary aspect of the present invention, an interface configured to communicate with at least another device, a memory configured to store computer program code, and at least one self-organization at a low management level A processor configured to cause the apparatus to issue a notification of a self-organizing network adjustment to notify an action of the network function from a low management level of the self-organizing network to a high management level of the self-organizing network; Are provided.

  According to an exemplary aspect of the present invention, an interface configured to communicate with at least another device, a memory configured to store computer program code, and a low management level of a self-organizing network A notification of self-organization network coordination that notifies the action of at least one self-organizing network function is received from the lower management level to the higher management level of the self-organizing network and the notified action is received at the higher management level. There is provided an apparatus comprising a processor configured to cause the apparatus to coordinate with respect to self-organizing network coordination.

  According to an exemplary aspect of the present invention, when a program is executed on a computer (eg, a computer of an apparatus according to one of the above-described exemplary apparatus-related aspects of the present invention), the above-described aspect of the present invention. A computer program product comprising computer-executable computer program code configured to cause a computer to perform a method according to one of the method-related normative aspects is provided.

  Such a computer program product comprises or is implemented as and / or implemented as a (tangible) computer-readable (storage) medium in which computer-executable computer program code is stored. Can be loaded directly into the computer's internal memory or its processor.

  Effective further developments or modifications of the above-described exemplary aspects of the present invention are described below.

  According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, multi-level self-organizing network coordination is provided. More particularly, the exemplary embodiments of the present invention provide means and mechanisms for implementing multi-level self-organizing network coordination (in a cellular communication system).

  Accordingly, improvements are achieved by methods, apparatus and computer program products that enable / facilitate the realization of multi-level self-organizing network coordination (in a cellular communication system).

  Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail as a non-limiting example with reference to the accompanying drawings.

1 is a schematic diagram of a self-organizing network architecture to which an exemplary embodiment of the present invention can be applied. FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of an example procedure according to an example embodiment of the invention. FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary variation of a procedure according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary structure of multi-level self-organizing network coordination according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an example apparatus according to an example embodiment of the invention.

  The present invention is described below with reference to specific non-limiting examples and what is presently considered as imaginable embodiments of the invention. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to these examples and is more broadly applicable.

  It should be noted that the following description of the invention and its embodiments primarily refers to specifications that are used as non-limiting examples for certain example network configurations and deployments. That is, the present invention and its embodiments are primarily described in the context of a 3GPP specification that is used as a non-limiting example for certain example network configurations and deployments. More particularly, an LTE / LTE advanced communication system is used as a non-limiting example for applying the exemplary embodiments described herein. Accordingly, the description of the exemplary embodiments described herein specifically refers to terms directly related thereto. Such terms are only used in connection with the non-limiting examples presented herein and, of course, do not limit the invention in any way. Rather, other network configurations or system deployments, etc. are used as long as they fit the features described herein.

  In particular, the present invention and its embodiments can apply self-organizing network (SON) coordination that facilitates proper and effective SON coordination across different management levels and domains (e.g., because of its underlying organizational principles). (Cellular) Communication system and / or network deployment.

  Various embodiments and examples of the invention and aspects or embodiments thereof are described below using a number of variations and / or alternatives. According to certain needs and constraints, all variations and / or alternatives described herein may be provided alone or in imaginable combinations (various variations and / or It should be noted in general (including combinations of individual features of alternatives).

  In accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present invention, generally, means and mechanisms for (enabling / enabling) multi-level self-organizing network (SON) coordination (in a cellular communication system) are provided. The

  FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a self-organizing network architecture to which an exemplary embodiment of the present invention can be applied. In FIG. 1, a broken line indicates a logical (SON) network level, which is also referred to as a (SON) network management level.

  As shown in FIG. 1, two network elements (NEs) such as base stations or access nodes are connected to an element manager (EM) and / or a domain manager (DM) via the Itf-S interface. It is assumed that it is normative. For example, an element manager is specifically configured to dominate a single network element (within a domain), and a domain manager specifically dominates a large number (eg, all) of network elements (within a domain) Configured as follows. The EM / DM and its two connected NEs are presumed preferentially to represent (or belong to) the SON management domain. The EM / DM (as well as another normative assumption EM / DM in which only the NE connection is shown) is connected to the network manager (NM) via the Itf-N interface. Such level cross-connection allows multi-level SON adjustment.

  Further, as shown in FIG. 1, it is assumed that the network element (NE) is directly connected to the network manager (NM) through the Itf-S interface.

  In such a SON architecture, although not shown in FIG. 1, NEs are connected to each other and / or EM / DM are also connected to each other. With such intra-level connections, single level (intra-domain or multi-domain) SON coordination can also be realized.

  Here, NE represents the network element (NE) level, EM / DM represents the element manager (EM) or domain manager (DM) level, and NM represents the network manager (NM) level. To do.

  In the exemplary embodiment of the present invention, it is assumed that the SON function is located at the NE level or at the EM / DM level or is transparent. Such an assumption is based on the precondition of SON adjustment that NE level function activity should be exposed to the EM / DM level.

  According to the exemplary embodiments of the invention described below, reference is mainly made to a low management level and a high management level. Referring to FIG. 1, the lower management level is the EM or DM level, while the higher management level is the NM level, or the lower management level is the NE level, while the higher management level is the EM or DM level. Alternatively, the lower management level is the NE level, while the higher management level is the NM level.

  That is, the exemplary embodiment of the present invention can be applied to an Itf-S interface and / or an Itf-N interface. The applicability of one or both of these interfaces depends on (vendor / operator specific) definition, configuration or implementation. For example, the EM may be integrated into the NE, in which case the Itf-N interface between the NE and NM is applicable for NE-NM coordination.

  FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary procedure according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

  The example procedure of FIG. 2 is assumed to be performed between a low management level (LML), in particular its LML entity, and a high management level (HML), in particular its HML entity. See the description above with respect to FIG. 1 for potential mapping between low and high management levels and network entities or levels in the SON architecture.

  As shown in FIG. 2, the procedure according to the exemplary embodiment of the present invention includes the following operations / functions.

  The LML entity issues a self-organizing network coordination notification that informs the HML of the action of at least one SON function in the LML, ie, a SON coordination notification. The HML entity receives a notification of self-organizing network coordination that notifies the action of at least one SON function from the LML, ie, the SON coordination notification, and coordinates the reported action with respect to the SON coordination in the HML, ie, the SON coordination. Carry out.

  Such a procedure according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention allows the activity of LML level (eg, NE or EM / DM level) functions to be exposed to HML (eg, NM) level.

  According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, operations / functions in LML act, ie, an LML entity is implemented in or by at least one SON function and / or SON coordination function, Located in any network entity at the lower management level of the network, eg NE and / or EM / DM. Also, the operation / function in HML acts, ie the HML entity is realized in or by the SON coordination function, which function is located in any network entity in the high management level of its underlying network, eg NM ing.

  According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, SON operations in HML convert adjustment-related information (from LML) that can be derived from received SON adjustment notifications to adjustment-related information that is available (locally) in HML. Including combining adjustment-related information (from the LML) that can be derived / added and / or derived from received SON adjustment notifications (in HML) with adjustment-related information that is available (locally). Adjustment-related information available locally (locally) in the HML is previously collected information and / or recent information that can be derived from SON notifications inside the HML. Then, further SON related operations / functions in HML are based on such added / collected and / or combined adjustment information. Thus, multi-level SON coordination can actually be realized by adding / collecting and / or combining coordination related information arising from different management levels.

  In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the operations / functions of FIG. 2 can be applied to different SON adjustment cases or behaviors. As described below, such applicable SON adjustment cases or behaviors include, for example, SON adjustment request cases or behaviors (also referred to as pre-action adjustment cases or behaviors) and SON adjustment information cases or behaviors (post-actions). Also referred to as an information case or behavior). In the SON adjustment request case or behavior, an SON adjustment decision is requested from the HML for the action of at least one SON function in the LML, and in the SON adjustment information case or behavior, the HML is notified about the action of at least one SON function in the LML. Made. Further details of such cases or behaviors are outlined below.

  FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary variation of a procedure according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

  As shown in FIG. 3, the procedure according to the exemplary embodiment of the present invention includes the operation / function of the procedure according to FIG. In addition, the procedure according to FIG. 3 includes at least one of the following operations / functions: Note that in FIG. 3, both such additional operations / functions are shown for simplicity, but they are inherently independent of each other.

  Referring to the dash-dot line in FIG. 3, on the other hand, the procedure according to the exemplary embodiment of the present invention is that the HML entity (when receiving the SON adjustment notification) determines the SON adjustment decision for the notified action in the LML. And issuing an SON adjustment operation to the LML that includes an SON adjustment decision for the action, ie, an SON adjustment decision for the action. The SON adjustment determination for the notified action in the LML is performed in consideration of the SON adjustment in the HML. The LML entity then receives an action for SON coordination (ie, a management operation), ie, a SON coordination action that includes a SON coordination decision for the notified action, and based on the SON coordination decision for the notified action. Activate at least one SON function in the LML.

  As used herein, notifications and actions (ie, management actions) each represent a message that is forwarded over an interface.

  Further, the transfer operation (ie, management operation) used herein is interpreted as corresponding to or equivalent to a kind of instruction, command or command for SON coordination and / or SON function operation in LML.

  According to an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the procedure according to any one of FIGS. 2 and 3 is initiated when triggered in any imaginable manner. For example, issuing an SON adjustment notification and / or selecting an SON adjustment case / behavior in the LML is, for example, a need or intention for the LML to perform at least one SON function and / or (multilevel) SON adjustment in view thereof. Or triggered when a request is determined. Also, such a trigger is that the LML determines that some confirmation and / or adjustment from the HML is necessary, intended or desired.

  According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, SON function operation in LML generally includes execution and / or coordination of execution of at least one such action by / function in at least one such SON function. That is, each SON function is appropriately operated / executed, or each SON function is appropriately operated in a distributed state between each SON function when the LML entity is realized in or by at least one SON function. / Tuned to be executed, but each SON function operates appropriately (in the domain, DM, EM, NE or LML) in a centralized state when the LML entity is implemented in or by the SON coordination function / Adjusted to be executed.

  According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the SON coordination procedure via the SON coordination interface is based on a kind of master / slave operating principle where the HML entity acts as a master and the LML entity acts as a slave. That is, as is apparent from FIG. 3, the LML notifies the HML about the SON adjustment, while the HML performs the SON adjustment (at least in the HML) as appropriate. In this regard, as described above, the HML adds information from notifications generated by the LML to the information collected for SON coordination and combines the information collected in this way for SON coordination purposes. This includes, for example, making a SON adjustment decision and distributing that decision to the LML (as a management action). Next, the LML implements the result of SON adjustment (for example, determination of HML occurrence) for the purpose of SON adjustment.

  As described above, the operations / functions according to the exemplary embodiments of the present invention can be applied to different SON adjustment cases or behaviors as shown in FIG. 3, for example, SON adjustment request cases or behaviors, and SONs. Applicable to adjustment information cases or behaviors.

  In the following, these two normatively applicable SON adjustment cases or behaviors according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail.

  As described above, in the previous action adjustment case or behavior, the SON function or child adjustment function (that is, the SON adjustment function in a parent-child relationship having a higher level parent adjustment function at a higher level) performs the intended action. In the post-action information case or behavior, the SON function or child adjustment function performs the action, and the higher level adjustment function or parent adjustment function (ie, the lower / low rank parent adjustment function) This is notified to the SON adjustment function in the parent-child relationship at a low level.

  In a SON coordination request case or behavior (ie, previous action coordination case or behavior), the notified action is related to the intended action to be performed by at least one SON function at the LML level. That is, the SON adjustment in this case is related to actions that have not yet been performed.

  In this case, the SON adjustment notification includes a request specific to the SON adjustment, where the intended action is notified and the SON adjustment decision is requested from the HML. Accordingly, SON adjustment in HML, and SON adjustment determination and SON adjustment operations refer to the intended action, and at least one SON function in LML is activated for that intended action.

  The SON adjustment specific request includes adjustment related profile information for at least one self-organizing network function based on which SON adjustment decision is made.

  More specifically, the SON coordination decision is either confirmation of the intended action, or rejection of the intended action, or at least one action (directing to) different from the intended action. Corresponding to When the SON adjustment decision corresponds to confirmation of the intended action, the SON function operation in the LML includes performing the intended action and / or adjusting its performance. When the SON adjustment decision corresponds to a rejection of the intended action, the SON functional behavior in the LML prohibits the intended action (eg, prevents, skips, omits, etc.) and / or Including adjusting the prohibition (eg, prevention, skipping, omission, etc.). When the SON adjustment decision corresponds to (leads to) at least one action different from the intended action, the SON function operation in the LML performs at least one other action (not the intended action). And / or coordinating its performance.

  The SON adjustment decision may also correspond to undoing the intended action. That is, such an undo decision responds to a request unique to the current SON adjustment with which HML (ie its adjustment logic) is holding some state and which is currently (ie, the newly requested action). Related to early actions (ie, previous notifications or operational cycles) as to whether it is appropriate to be undone in view of the newly requested action.

  In the SON coordination information case or behavior (ie, post-action information case or behavior), the notified action is related to a performed action performed by at least one SON function in the LML. That is, the SON adjustment in this case is related to the action already performed.

  In this case, the SON adjustment notification includes information specific to the SON adjustment, in which the performed action is notified and the HML is notified about the SON adjustment based on the action. Thus, SON adjustment in HML, and potentially SON adjustment decisions and SON adjustment actions (if any) refer to the performed action, and at least one SON function in LML is related to or performed on the performed action. Operates in view of this.

  In this case, neither a specific SON adjustment decision for LML nor a corresponding SON adjustment operation or SON function operation is required. That is, when the HML entity thinks (with its SON coordination in HML) that the action performed is accepted and therefore must be confirmed, the procedure ends without further action / function. . When an HML entity thinks (with its SON coordination in HML) that the action performed is unacceptable and therefore not confirmed, the HML entity will make a SON coordination decision and issue the corresponding SON coordination action The LML entity then operates the SON function accordingly.

  More specifically, the SON adjustment decision may correspond to one of at least one action (which leads) different from the action performed and the undo of the action performed. When the SON coordination decision corresponds to at least one action (leading to) different from the action performed, the SON function behavior in the LML is at least one other action (in addition to the action previously performed). Including performing actions and / or coordinating performance. When the SON adjustment decision corresponds to an undo of the performed action (basically equivalent to a rejection in the previous action adjustment case or behavior), the SON functional action in the LML undoes the performed action and / or undos. Including adjusting.

  In the case of a SON coordination request case or behavior, the LML entity must wait for a decision / action from the HML entity before the LML can take action based on the decision / action in the requested action. In the case of a SON coordination information case or behavior, the LML entity may perform further actions with the same or different SON functions after issuing the post action information notification, each such further action being Receive one of two SON adjustment cases or behaviors. Such further actions may also be implementation specific, for example.

  According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the SON coordination specific request is a notification based on a (3GPP) template for operation / notification. More specifically, the SON coordination specific request is an instance of a dedicated information object class (IOC) for notification to the SON control and / or SON coordination interface, such as, for example, notify SON Coordination Request notification.

  Such notification may be determined by an IRPAAgent (ie, for example, a SON coordination (child) process in LML, or directly a SON function process) determined from an IRPManager (ie, for example, a SON coordination (parent) process in HML). Allow to request. Such notification of a SON coordination specific request includes one or more of the following information elements as input parameters (ie, the content or payload of the notification organization).

Request ID (or requestId)
This information element is the identifier of the request instance, for example, the associated notifyRadioDataCompletionRequest notification. This corresponds to the information notificationId.

  This information element represents the mandatory qualifier, ie the M, Y qualifier, on which the notification is filtered.

Request SON function (or requesting SON Function)
This information element identifies the SON function or SON function type that requires adjustment, eg, HOO, LBO, CCO, etc. If a SON function (eg a kind of mega SON function) deals with a large number of SON functions or SON function types, eg HOO and LBO, all of these SON functions or SON function types are this information element. Or flagged.

  This information element represents the mandatory qualifier, i.e. the M, Y qualifier, for which the notification is filtered.

SON function profile (or sonFunctionProfile)
This information element includes the SON function (s) indicated by the information element important for coordination, eg vendor, release xyz, priority, (subsequent) optimization target (s), and its Relating to one or more of priority (s) and / or weight (s), current step / stage of operation, request time, imagined impact area, target cell, imagined impact time, etc. Give information. Note that the impact area and impact time can be further adjusted prior to making a decision, such as by an adjustment function instance and / or another corresponding SON function instance based on its information portion, etc.

  This information element represents a mandatory qualifier, i.e. an M, N qualifier, whose notifications are not filtered.

Action intended by SON (or sonIntendedAction)
This information element is, for example, by the information element where the (child) SON adjustment process (or SON function) in LML requires the (parent) SON adjustment process in HNL to determine the intended action, for example. Contains the intended action of the indicated SON function (s). Its intended action parameters include the following information: action type (eg, process call, parameter configuration, etc.), process call parameters, configuration parameters (selected value / optimum value and acceptable Value range), target cell, action planning time, imagined impact area, imagined impact time (ie, no other process or reconfiguration within the impact area), etc. Contains (consists of).

  This information element represents a mandatory qualifier, i.e. an M, N qualifier, whose notifications are not filtered.

  According to the exemplary embodiment of the present invention, for example, the configuration data information (of the SON function) included in the SON intention action element is changed again for the time when the configuration parameter was last changed. Extended with information about the period of time that should not be taken and / or the SON target for which weight / priority was pursued at the last change. Then, a new change (due to SON adjustment) will only occur when a sufficiently high-ranked SON target (eg, with respect to priority and / or weight) is pursued by that change and / or when the unchanged timer has expired. , (E.g., by SON adjustment decision).

  In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a new action is defined or new to notify the IRPAgent about the result of the SON adjustment decision (eg, pre-action adjustment request or post-action adjustment information). A support IOC is defined, and the information is relayed to the IRPAgent by the create operation.

  According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the SON adjustment specific information is a notification based on a (3GPP) template for operation / notification. More specifically, the SON adjustment-specific information is an instance of a dedicated information object class (IOC) for notification to the SON control and / or SON adjustment interface, for example, notifyAttributeValueChange notification, notifyObjectCreate notification, or notifyObjectDelete notification. is there. Thus, post-action information can be obtained by reusing or extending existing 3GPP notifications or using existing 3GPP notifications as templates for SON coordination specific notifications.

  Such notification is performed by an IRPAgent (ie, for example, a SON coordination (child) process in LML, or directly a SON function process) to an IRPManager (ie, for example, a SON coordination (parent) process in HML). Allows notification of actions taken. Such notification of SON coordination specific information includes one or more of the following information elements as input parameters (ie, the content or payload of the notification organization).

Information ID (or informationId)
This information element is an identifier of an information instance, for example, an associated notifyRadioDataCompletionRequest notification. This corresponds to the information notificationId.

  This information element represents the mandatory qualifier, i.e. the M, Y qualifier, for which the notification is filtered.

Notification SON function (or informing SON Function)
This information element identifies the SON function or SON function type that notifies the adjustment, for example, HOO, LBO, CCO, etc. If a SON function (eg a kind of mega SON function) deals with a large number of SON functions or SON function types, eg HOO and LBO, all of these SON functions or SON function types are this information element. Or flagged.

  This information element represents the mandatory qualifier, i.e. the M, Y qualifier, for which the notification is filtered.

Action performed (or soPerformedAction)
This information element is, for example, the SON function (1) indicated by the information element as to which (child) SON adjustment process (or SON function) in LML notifies the (parent) SON adjustment process in HML, for example. One or more) performed actions. The parameters of the action performed include the following information: action type (eg, process call, parameter configuration, etc.), process call parameters, configuration parameters (selected value / optimum value and acceptable) Value range), target cell, time of action, imagined impact area, imagined impact time (ie, no other processes or reconfigurations in the impact area), etc. (Consisting of them).

  This information element represents a mandatory qualifier, i.e. an M, N qualifier, whose notifications are not filtered.

  According to the exemplary embodiment of the present invention, for example, the configuration data information (of the SON function) included in the SON execution action element is changed again for the time when the configuration parameter was last changed. Extended with information about the period of time that should not be taken and / or the SON target for which weight / priority was pursued at the last change. Then, a new change (due to SON adjustment) will only occur when a sufficiently high-ranked SON target (eg, with respect to priority and / or weight) is pursued by that change and / or when the unchanged timer has expired. , (E.g., by SON adjustment decision).

  According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the SON adjustment operation is an operation based on a (3GPP) template for operation / notification. More specifically, the SON coordination operation is an instance of a dedicated information object class (IOC) for operations on the SON control and / or SON coordination interface, such as, for example, a SON Coordination Request operation.

  Such an action may be caused by an IRPManager (ie, for example, a SON coordination (parent) process in HML) giving a decision to a notified action, ie a previous action coordination request, or an IRPAAgent (ie, eg, in LML). Allows to react to post-action adjustment information from the SON adjustment (child) process, or directly the SON function process). Such SON adjustment operations include one or more of the following information elements as input parameters (ie, the operating organization's content or payload).

Request ID (or requestId)
This information element is an identifier of a related adjustment notification, such as a request instance requesting a previous action adjustment or an information instance giving post-action information. This corresponds to the information notificationId.
This information element represents a mandatory qualifier, i.e. an M qualifier.

SON adjustment decision (or sonCoordinationDecision)
This information element contains a decision on the SON action concerned, for example the intended action requested by the (child) SON coordinating function or directly by the relevant SON function instance, or the action performed notified thereby. .
This information element further includes a decision time.

This is consistent with information from confirmed or confirmed, rejected or rejected, another action or other action (or the one that leads to it), and undoing or undoing. If the decision is a possible confirmation or confirmation against the previous action adjustment case or behavior, the requested information can be performed or adjusted accordingly. If the decision is a possible rejection or rejection for a previous action adjustment case or behavior, the requested action must not be performed or adjusted accordingly. If the decision is another action or other action (or a guide) that is considered for both the previous action adjustment case or behavior and the post-action adjustment information case or behavior (at least) One) action must be performed or adjusted accordingly. If the decision is a possible undo or undo for post-action adjustment information, the actions described herein must be undone or adjusted accordingly. Decision undoing or undoing can also be considered for previous action adjustment information, which in this case considers which adjustment logic has kept some state and which newly requested action, here Note that it refers to an early action (ie, a previous notification or operational cycle) regarding whether it is appropriate to undo.
This information element represents a mandatory qualifier, i.e. an M qualifier.

  Further, such SON adjustment operation includes the following information elements as output parameters.

Result This information element confirms the success of the data reception by instructing the result = success, or notifies the failure of the data reception by instructing the result = failure. It matches the information result.
This information element represents a mandatory qualifier, i.e. an M qualifier.

  Referring to the dashed line in FIG. 3, on the other hand, the procedure according to the exemplary embodiment of the present invention is that the LML entity (before issuing the SON adjustment notice) can apply different SON adjustment cases as described above. Or selecting a behavior, eg, a SON adjustment request case or behavior, or a SON adjustment information case or behavior. Based on such selection, as described above, the LML entity issues a SON coordination specific request or SON coordination specific information, and further procedures are proceeded accordingly.

  According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, such selection is made based on a default coordination behavior and / or on a functional basis and / or a cell basis according to at least one self-organizing network control attribute. Made on the basis. At least one self-organizing network control attribute so that an LML entity can take action on its own to provide post-action information or whether it needs to request a pre-action adjustment. Gives additional control information. Such control information is at the SON function level, ie, the associated SON function (s) (eg, “HOO always requires pre-adjustment with LBO”, “CCO follows HOO One or more target cells (e.g., "one or more") of the SON function (s) or action (s) CCO only requires preconditioning when done in cells 1, 2, 3 ").

The choice between these two SON adjustment cases or behaviors for adjustment can be made as follows.
A previous action adjustment case or behavior is applied when the action needs to be verified by the (parent) SON adjustment function in the HML before performing a multi-domain / level-influence action, and-(1) multi-domain / The level-influencing action does not require an immediate direct decision from the (parent) SON adjustment function in the HML, while the action notification affects the further adjustment decision of the (parent) SON adjustment function in the HML, and / or Or (2) Multi-domain / level impact actions can be ignored to the network via further adjustment actions (eg, undo) determined and executed following the post action information by the (parent) SON adjustment function in HML When it can be easily correlated with damage, the post-action information case or Behavior is applied.

  Further, the default behavior is defined to apply, for example, a post-action information case or behavior when no other explicit or implicit case / behavior selection has been or has been made.

  Such default behavior is commanded by the HML or at the system level, and the LML operates based on such HML / system-generated default behavior instructions. In SON adjustment case / behavior selection at LML or system level, the same features as described above for the normative scenario of SON adjustment case / behavior selection in LML can be applied.

  In view of the optional nature of case / behavior selection procedures in LML described above, the exemplary embodiments of the present invention provide scenarios, systems and structures in which such case / behavior selection procedures are not performed, and such case / behavior selections. Note that the procedure encompasses scenarios, systems and structures that are performed at another level or location, eg, HML or system level. For example, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the overall system is configured (previously) to operate with only one of the SON adjustment cases or behaviors described above, and thus such SON adjustment cases / behaviors. Make selection unnecessary.

  Note that in general terms such as “undo” are also referred to as, for example, rollback and the like. Therefore, performing / coordinating undo as used herein and performing / coordinating rollback should be interpreted as equivalent or synonymous.

  According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, such SON adjustment case / behavior selection is based on attributes according to the (3GPP) specification. In particular, such an attribute is a dedicated information object class (IOC) for the SON control and / or SON coordination interface, for example an instance of an IOC for switching on and off SON functions.

  An attribute according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention that allows selection at a functional level / base is represented as SONFunctionsForCoordinationOnFunctionLevel, etc., and the attribute constraint is that the condition is “SON adjustment supported”. Its qualifier characteristics are that its support qualifier is subject to configuration management, its read qualifier is mandatory, and its write qualifier is mandatory. That's it.

  The attribute sONFunctionsForCoordinationOnFunctionLevel or the like applies whether the post-action information adjustment should be applied to a specific SON function or a plurality of specific SON functions (that is, whether post-action information notification should be issued) or the pre-action request adjustment is applied. It is specified to define whether to do (ie whether to issue a previous action request notification).

The legal value includes one or more of the following.
A list of one or more SON functions or SON function groups and their specified behavior, eg a list of elements SON coordinationFunctionGroupAndBehavior,
Element SONcoordinationFunctionGroupAndBeavior, sequence {ListofSONfunction; SONcoordinationBehaviour}, where
-SONfunction indicates an SON function such as HOO, LBO, CCO, RACHO, ANR ..., and -SONcoordinationBehavior indicates one of postActionformation and preActionCoordination.

  An attribute according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention that allows selection at the cell level / base is represented as SONFunctionsForCoordinationOnCellLevel etc., and its attribute constraint is that the condition is “SON adjustment supported”. Its qualifier characteristics are that its support qualifier is subject to configuration management, its read qualifier is mandatory, and its write qualifier is mandatory. That's it.

  The attribute sONFunctionsForCoordinationOnCellLevel, etc., indicates whether to apply post-action information adjustment to the (target) cell or a plurality of (target) cells (that is, whether to issue post-action information notification), or these (target) cells ( It is specified to define whether the pre-action request adjustment should be applied (ie, should the pre-action request notification be issued) for SON functions with one or more).

The legal value includes one or more of the following.
-A list of one or more cells (in connection with one or more SON functions or SON function groups) and their specified behavior, eg a list of elements SON coordination function CellList Behavior;
The element SONcoordinationFunctionCellListAndBehavior, the sequence {SONfunction; ListofCells; SONcoordinationBehaviour}, where
-SONfunction indicates an SON function such as HOO, LBO, CCO, RACHO, ANR ..., and -SONcoordinationBehavior indicates one of postActionformation and preActionCoordination.

  The two said attributes may each be used alone or in combination. If both attributes, for example, SONFunctionsForCoordinationOnFunctionLevel and SONFunctionsForCoordinationOnCellLevel, contain information about the same SON function, then SONFunctionsForCord FavorOrCordinCelVelCorminanceForCordInLordForCordFelCordInLordForCord

  FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary structure of multi-level self-organizing network coordination according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

  The structure of FIG. 4 represents the high management level of the network on which the NM level is based, while the network on which the EM / DM / NE level (ie one of the EM / DM level and / or the NE level) is based. Normatively based on the assumption that it represents a low management level. Alternatively, as described above, the EM / DM level may represent a high management level of the underlying network, while the NE level represents a low management level of the underlying network.

  As shown in FIG. 4, this canonical structure assumes that the NM entity includes a SON coordination function that represents an IRPManager entity, and that each EM / DM / NE entity includes a SON coordination function that represents an IRPAgent entity. . The SON adjustment function in the NM entity and the SON adjustment function in the EM / DM / NE entity in the domain 1 are in a parent-child relationship.

  As described above, LML-related operations / functions are SON adjustment functions at the EM / DM / NE level, eg, SON adjustment functions at the EM / DM / NE entity in domain 1, or SON functions at the EM / DM / NE level. For example, realized by the SON function of the process instance 6 in the EM / DM / NE entity of the domain 1, while the operation / function related to HML is realized by the SON adjustment function at the HML level, eg, the SON adjustment function in the NM entity Is done.

  In the case of an LML location SON function in cooperation with an HML entity, the NM performs all coordination function activities between process instances 3, 4 and 6, for example according to FIG. 4 (and SON functions within the domain). For example, make adjustments between themselves in a distributed state). In the case of the LML location SON coordination function in cooperation with the HML entity, the EM / DM / NE performs the coordination function activity of the SON function to be coordinated, for example for process instances 3 and 4 according to FIG.

  Such a multi-level coordination interface function according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is a notification between LML (below the dashed line indicating the Itf-N interface) and HML (above the dashed line indicating the Itf-N interface). / The operation is shown in FIG. 4 by two pairs of arrows. Such a multi-level coordination interface function according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is effective in addressing level crossings and domain cross interdependencies between certain SON functions, as shown in an exemplary manner in FIG.

  It should be noted that the SON adjustment structure according to FIG. 4 is merely illustrative. In particular, FIG. 4 shows a structure in which SON functions in LML (eg, EM / DM / NE level) work directly with HML entities, and SON coordination functions work with HML for two other SON functions. Other structures are also applicable. In another structure, the number of directly cooperating SON functions and coordinated SON functions in LML (eg, EM / DM / NE level) is different. In another structure, all SON functions in LML (eg, EM / DM / NE level) are adjusted by one or more SON adjustment functions, or in LML (eg, EM / DM / NE level). All SONs coordinate directly with the HML entity.

  In general, terminology pairs such as master / slave, parent / child and manager / agent are used herein to refer to different management levels and / or hierarchy between their respective entities / functions. Such term pairs are to be interpreted herein as equivalent or synonymous. In particular, the relationship between the upper / high rank SON adjustment function (at the high level) and the lower / low rank SON adjustment function (at the low level) is here also the master / slave relationship, parent / child Also called relationship and manager / agent relationship.

  In view of the foregoing, the exemplary embodiments of the present invention provide multi-level self-organizing network coordination that facilitates proper and effective SON coordination across different management levels and domains. Such multi-level self-organizing network coordination according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention is effective for SON coordination across standard OSS / AOM interfaces, ie, Itf-N and / or Itf-S interfaces. Provides procedures, information elements, etc.

  Accordingly, a specific multi-level self-organizing network coordination procedure is provided that facilitates the transport of self-organizing network coordination information between different management levels.

  Therefore, a specific multi-level adjustment interface based on the principle of multi-vendor / release domain adjustment, in which the SON adjustment function has each OSS / OAM management level (ie, network element (NE) level, element management (EM) level, And an interface specified for network management (NM) level). The interface procedure according to the exemplary embodiment of the present invention requires that a child or lower level entity requests or informs the parent or higher level entity about the adjustment decision of the intended action or informs it about the action taken and It is based on a “notification / action” procedure in which a high level entity responds accordingly to its child or lower level entity via its decision via the OSS / OAM interface.

  According to the exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the SON adjustment function at the higher management level acts as the parent (manager) of the SON adjustment function at the lower management level, and the SON adjustment function at the lower management level is at the higher management level. It works as a child (agent) of the parent (manager) SON adjustment function. The interface between the child (agent) and the parent (manager) is specified as it is defined via the OSS / AM interface (Itf-S and / or Itf-N interface).

  The multi-level self-organizing network coordination (interface) according to the exemplary embodiments of the present invention can be applied to multi-vendor / release networks and / or heterogeneous networks as described above.

  Furthermore, the multi-level self-organizing network coordination (interface) according to the exemplary embodiments of the present invention can be applied to distributed, centralized or hybrid SON architectures. Referring to FIG. 1, the illustrated SON architecture is a distributed SON architecture when only EM / DM (and / or NE) has SON function, and concentrated when only NM has SON function. Type SON architecture, and hybrid SON architecture when EM / DM (and / or NE) and NM have SON functionality. In any case, the multi-level self-organizing network coordination (interface) according to the exemplary embodiment of the present invention can distribute the (manageable) SON coordination function between NM, EM / DM and NE, so that it is hybrid Particularly suitable for SON architecture.

  Multi-level self-organizing network coordination (procedure / interface) according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention can include imaginable SON functions or couplings between SON functions, including, for example, HOO, LBO, CCO, ANR, RACHO, etc. It can be applied to adjust interdependencies. In this regard, HOO is also referred to as, for example, MRO, and LBO is also referred to as, for example, MLB.

  Generally, here, when referring to a network manager, element manager, domain manager or network element, it actually means a function corresponding to it regardless of its implementation or implementation. For example, a network / domain / element manager in the meaning of the present specification is a network / domain / realized / implemented as a stand-alone network entity, an integrated function in a network entity, an integration of each system, etc. Refers to domain / element manager / managing function.

  The procedures and functions described above are implemented by each functional element, processor, etc., as described below.

  Although the above exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been described primarily with reference to methods, procedures, and functions, the corresponding exemplary embodiments of the present invention include both software and / or hardware. , Each device, network node and system.

  Each exemplary embodiment of the present invention is described below with reference to FIG. 5, but for the sake of brevity, refer to the detailed description of the methods, functions, principles and operations described with reference to FIGS. To do.

  In FIG. 5, the solid line block is basically configured to perform the above-described operations. All solid line blocks are basically configured to perform each of the methods and apparatus described above. Note that for FIG. 5, individual blocks are meant to represent each functional block that implements each function, process or procedure, respectively. Such functional blocks are implementation independent, i.e. implemented by some kind of hardware or software. The arrows and lines that interconnect the individual blocks are meant to indicate the operational coupling between them, which is a physical and / or logical coupling while being implementation independent (e.g., wired or Wireless) and on the other hand any number of intermediate functional entities (not shown). The direction of the arrow means that a certain operation is performed and / or a certain data is transferred.

  In addition, only functional blocks associated with any of the methods, procedures and functions described above are shown in FIG. Those skilled in the art will recognize the existence of other conventional functional blocks necessary for the operation of structural structures such as power supplies, central processing units, memories, etc., for example. In particular, a memory is provided for storing programs or program instructions that control individual functional entities that operate as described herein.

  FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary apparatus according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

  In view of the foregoing, the devices 10 and 20 shown here are suitable for use in the implementation of the exemplary embodiments of the invention described herein.

  The device 10 shown here represents a NE (eg eNB) or a lower management level entity (such as an EM or DM) of a cellular communication system or its underlying network (eg its modem), and As shown in FIG. 1, it is configured to show architectural relationships and to perform procedures and / or show functions as apparent from one of FIGS. The device 20 shown here represents (part of) a high management level entity such as EM or DM or NM of a cellular communication system or its underlying network (eg its modem) and is apparent from FIG. As shown in FIG. 2 through FIG. 4, the procedure is performed and / or the function is shown.

  As shown in FIG. 5, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, each device comprises a processor 11/21, a memory 12/22, and an interface 13/23, which are a bus 14/24, etc. And the devices are each connected via link A.

  The processor 11/21 and / or the interface 13/23 also includes a modem or the like to facilitate communication over a (hard wire or wireless) link. The interface 13/23 includes a suitable transceiver coupled to one or more antennas or communication means for each (hardwire or wireless) communication with the link or connected device (s). The interface 13/23 is typically configured to communicate with at least one other device, ie, that interface.

  Assume that memory 12/22 includes program instructions or computer program code that, when executed by each processor, enables each electronic device or apparatus to operate in accordance with the exemplary embodiments of the present invention.

  Generally speaking, each device / apparatus (and / or part thereof) presents means for performing each operation and / or indicating each function and / or each device (and / or part thereof). Has a function for performing each operation and / or indicating each function.

  In the following description, when it is stated that a processor (or other means) is configured to perform a function, this potentially cooperates with computer program code stored in the memory of each device (at least It should be construed to be equivalent to the statement that the (one) processor or the corresponding circuitry is configured to at least cause the apparatus to perform the functions described as such. It should also be construed that such functions can be equally implemented by specially configured circuits or means for performing each function (ie, “perform device xxx-ing”). The expression “a processor configured in” is interpreted as equivalent to the expression “means for xxx-ing”).

  In its most basic form, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the device 10 or its processor 11 may perform an action of at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level to a low management level of the self-organizing network. And issuing a notification for coordinating the self-organizing network to notify the high management level of the self-organizing network.

  Therefore, in other words, the apparatus 10 includes each issuing unit.

  As described above, the apparatus 10 includes each receiving unit, operating unit, and / or selecting unit.

  In its most basic form, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the device 20 or its processor 21 performs an action of at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level with a low management level of the self-organizing network. To receive notifications for self-organizing network coordination that informs the high management level of the self-organizing network and to perform adjustments on the notified actions with respect to the self-organizing network coordination at the high management level Composed.

  Therefore, in other words, the apparatus 20 includes each receiving unit and adjusting unit.

  As described above, the device 20 includes means for making decisions and means for issuing.

  As mentioned above, the exemplary embodiments of the present invention encompass various configurations of management levels. For example, the low management level is the element or domain manager level and the high management level is the network manager level, or the low management level is the network element level and the high management level is the element or domain manager level. The lower management level is the network element level, and the higher management level is the network manager level.

  For further details regarding the operation / function of the individual devices, please refer to the above description for any one of FIGS.

  According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the processor 11/21, the memory 12/22 and the interface 13/23 may be implemented as individual modules, chips, chipsets, circuits, etc. One or more may each be implemented as a common module, chip, chipset, circuit, etc.

  In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the system includes an imaginable combination of the device / apparatus thus illustrated and other network elements configured to operate as described above.

  In general, each functional block or element in accordance with the above-described aspects is each implemented in hardware and / or software by any known means if it is only adapted to perform the desired function of each part. Note that this can be done. The method steps described herein may be implemented with individual functional blocks or devices, or one or more method steps may be implemented with a single functional block or device. .

  In general, the method steps are suitable for implementation as software or in hardware without changing the inventive idea. Such software is software code independent and is known or developed in the future, eg Java®, C ++, C and assembler, as long as the functions defined by the method steps are preserved. Explicitly using a programming language. Also, such hardware is hardware type independent, and MOS (metal oxide semiconductor), CMOS (complementary MOS), BiMOS (bipolar MOS), BiCMOS (bipolar CMOS), ECL (emitter coupled logic). Using known or future-developed hardware technologies such as TTL (transistor-transistor logic), eg, ASIC (Application Specific IC (Integrated Circuit)) component, FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) component, CPLD It can be implemented using (complex programmable logic device) components, or DSP (digital signal processor) components. A device / apparatus is represented by a semiconductor chip, a chipset, or a (hardware) module that includes such a chip or chipset, but this is not a hardware implementation, but a function of the device / apparatus or module It does not exclude the possibility of being implemented as software in a (software) module such as a computer program or computer program product containing executable software code portions that are executed / run by A device can be considered, for example, as a device / apparatus or as an assembly of two or more devices / apparatus, regardless of whether they function in cooperation with each other or are independent of each other but within the same apparatus housing. it can.

  The devices and / or means, or portions thereof, can be implemented as individual devices, but this does not exclude that they are implemented in a distributed fashion throughout the system as long as the functionality of the devices is preserved. Those skilled in the art will recognize such and similar principles.

  Software in the sense of the description herein is a computer readable program storing code means or portions for performing each function or software code comprising a computer program or computer program product and each data structure or code means / portion. Software (or computer program or computer program product) implemented on a tangible medium such as a storage medium or potentially implemented on a signal or chip during processing.

  The present invention also encompasses imaginable combinations of the method steps and operations described above, as well as imaginable combinations of the nodes, devices, modules or elements described above, so long as the concepts of the method and structure are applicable. .

  In view of the above, a means for realizing multi-level self-organizing network coordination including self-organizing network coordination procedures has been provided. Such means preferentially perform actions of at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level before the action is actually performed or after the action is actually performed. Communicating notifications for self-organizing network coordination to notify the high management level of the self-organizing network from the low management level and adjusting the notified actions with respect to the self-organizing network coordination at the high management level including.

  Means according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention include certain network environments, for example, 3GPP RAN1 / RAN2 / RAN3 standard, ie LTE standard of Release 10/11/12 / ... (including LTE Advanced and its evolution) ) And / or UMTS standards and / or WCDMA standard.

  While the present invention has been described above with reference to the accompanying drawing examples, it should be understood that the invention is not limited thereto. Rather, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention can be modified in many ways without departing from the scope of the inventive concept disclosed herein.

List of Acronyms and Abbreviations 3GPP: Third Generation Partnership Project ANR: Automatic Adjacency CCO: Capacity and Coverage Optimization DM: Domain Management / Manager EM: Element Management / Manager eNB: Evolved NodeB
HML: High management level HOO: Handover optimal IOC: Information object class IRP: Integration reference point LBO: Load balance optimization LML: Low management level LTE: Long-term evolution MLB: Mobile load balance MRO: Mobile robustness optimization NE : Network element NM: Network management / manager OAM: Operation and maintenance OSS: Operation support system RACHO: Random access channel optimization RAT: Radio access technology SON: Self-organizing network UMTS: Universal mobile telecommunications system WCDMA: Wideband code division multiple access

10: LML entity 11, 21: Processor 12, 22: Memory 13, 23: Interface 20: HML entity

Claims (38)

  Issuing notifications for self-organizing network coordination that notifies actions of at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level from a low management level of the self-organizing network to a high management level of the self-organizing network Including methods.   The notification includes a unique request for self-organizing network coordination, and the notified action is an intended action intended to be performed by at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level, to which The method of claim 1, wherein a determination of self-organizing network coordination is required from a high administrative level, which includes coordination-related profile information of at least one self-organizing network function. Receiving a self-organizing network coordination action from a high management level, including a self-organizing network coordination decision for the intended action, and at a low management level based on the self-organizing network coordination decision for the intended action Operate at least one self-organizing network function;
The method of claim 2 further comprising: The operation is
Performing the intended action and / or coordinating execution with at least one self-organizing network function at a lower management level when the decision of self-organizing network coordination corresponds to confirmation of the intended action;
Prohibiting the intended action and / or coordinating the prohibition with at least one self-organizing network function at a lower management level when the decision of self-organizing network coordination corresponds to rejection of the intended action; and When the decision of self-organizing network coordination corresponds to at least one action other than the intended action, at least one other action is performed and / or performed by at least one self-organizing network function at a lower management level. Adjust the
4. The method of claim 3, comprising one of the following:   The notification includes information unique to the self-organizing network coordination, and the notified action is an executed action performed by at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level, and a higher management level includes The method of claim 1, in which notification is made for self-organizing network coordination based. Receiving a self-organizing network coordination action including a determination of a self-organizing network coordination for the performed action from a high management level, and at a low management level based on the determination of the self-organizing network coordination for the performed action Operate at least one self-organizing network function;
The method of claim 5 further comprising: The operation is
Performing at least one other action with at least one self-organizing network function at a lower management level when the determination of self-organizing network coordination corresponds to at least one action different from the performed action; and / or And / or undoing the completed action by at least one self-organizing network function at a lower management level when the determination of self-organizing network adjustment corresponds to undoing of the performed action, and / or Adjusting the undo,
The method of claim 6, comprising one of:   Self-organization network coordination request behavior from a high management level is required to determine the self-organization network coordination for the action of at least one self-organization network function, and notification to the high management level regarding at least one self-organization network function Between self-organizing network coordination information behaviors made, at least one of function-based and / or cell-based according to at least one self-organizing network control attribute, and / or on the basis of default coordination behavior. The method according to claim 1, further comprising selecting. The low management level is an element or domain manager level and the high management level is a network manager level, or the low management level is a network element level and the high management level is an element or domain A manager level, or the low management level is a network element level, and the high management level is a network manager level.
9. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 8. The method is operable in a self-organizing network, and / or the method is operable in or by a network element entity and / or element manager entity, and / or the method is at a low management level Operable in or by at least one self-organizing network function and / or self-organizing network coordination function, and / or the low management level and the high management level are each level of the operation support system, and / or Corresponding to each operation and maintenance level of the communication system, and / or the low and high management levels are linked via at least one of an Itf-N interface and an Itf-S interface;
10. A method according to any one of claims 1-9. Receiving a notification for self-organizing network coordination that notifies an action of at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level from a low management level of the self-organizing network to a high management level of the self-organizing network; and Coordinating the notified action with respect to self-organizing network coordination at its high management level;
A method involving that. The adjustment is
Collect adjustment-related information from a lower management level that can be derived from the received notification and / or obtain adjustment-related information from a lower management level that can be derived from the received notification from a higher management level. Combine with adjustment related information,
12. The method of claim 11 comprising:   The notification includes a unique request for self-organizing network coordination, and the notified action is an intended action intended to be performed by at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level, to which 13. A method according to claim 11 or 12, wherein a determination of self-organizing network coordination is required from a high management level, which comprises coordination-related profile information of at least one self-organizing network function. Making a self-organizing network coordination decision for the intended action according to coordination related profile information of at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level, and including a self-organizing network coordination decision for the intended action Issuing actions for self-organizing network coordination to lower management levels;
And the determination of the self-organizing network adjustment is one of confirmation of the intended action, rejection of the intended action, at least one action different from the intended action. The method of claim 13, corresponding to.   The notification includes information unique to the self-organizing network coordination, and the notified action is an executed action performed by at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level, and a higher management level includes 13. A method according to claim 11 or 12, in which notification is made for self-organizing network coordination based. Making a self-organizing network coordination decision for the performed action at a low management level, and issuing actions for self-organizing network coordination including a self-organizing network coordination decision for the completed action to a low management level ,
The determination of the self-organizing network adjustment corresponds to one of at least one action different from the completed action and undoing of the completed action. The method described. The low management level is an element or domain manager level and the high management level is a network manager level, or the low management level is a network element level and the high management level is an element or domain A manager level, or the low management level is a network element level, and the high management level is a network manager level.
17. A method according to any one of claims 11 to 16. The method is operable in a self-organizing network, and / or the method is operable in or by a network manager entity, and / or the method is self-organizing network coordination at a low management level. Operable in or by function and / or the low management level and the high management level correspond to each level of operation support system and / or each operation and maintenance level of the communication system and / or low The management level and the higher management level are linked via at least one of an Itf-N interface and an Itf-S interface.
18. A method according to any one of claims 11 to 17. An interface configured to communicate with at least another device;
A memory configured to store computer program code;
A processor;
The processor comprises: the processor;
Issuing a notification for coordination of a self-organizing network to notify an action of at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level from a low management level of the self-organizing network to a high management level of the self-organizing network;
A device configured to accomplish this.   The notification includes a unique request for self-organizing network coordination, and the notified action is an intended action intended to be performed by at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level, to which 20. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein a determination of self-organizing network coordination is required from a high management level, which includes coordination-related profile information of at least one self-organizing network function. Receiving a self-organizing network coordination action from a high management level, including a self-organizing network coordination decision for the intended action, and at a low management level based on the self-organizing network coordination decision for the intended action Operate at least one self-organizing network function;
21. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the apparatus is configured to accomplish this. Performing the intended action and / or coordinating execution with at least one self-organizing network function at a lower management level when the decision of self-organizing network coordination corresponds to confirmation of the intended action;
Prohibiting the intended action and / or coordinating the prohibition with at least one self-organizing network function at a lower management level when the decision of self-organizing network coordination corresponds to rejection of the intended action; and When the decision of self-organizing network coordination corresponds to at least one action other than the intended action, at least one other action is performed and / or performed by at least one self-organizing network function at a lower management level. Adjust the
24. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the apparatus is configured to perform an operation according to one of the following:   The notification includes information unique to the self-organizing network coordination, and the notified action is an executed action performed by at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level, and a higher management level includes The apparatus of claim 19, informed about it for a self-organizing network coordination based. Receiving from the high management level operations for self-organizing network coordination including a determination of self-organizing network coordination for the performed action, and at least at a low management level based on the determination of self-organizing network coordination for the performed action Operates one self-organizing network function,
24. The apparatus of claim 23, configured to accomplish this. Performing at least one other action with at least one self-organizing network function at a lower management level when the determination of self-organizing network coordination corresponds to at least one action different from the performed action; and / or Undo and / or undo the completed action by at least one self-organizing network function at a lower management level when the performance coordination and self-organizing network coordination decision corresponds to undoing of the completed action. Adjust the
25. The apparatus of claim 24, configured to perform an operation according to one of the following:   Self-organization network coordination request behavior from a high management level is required to determine the self-organization network coordination for the action of at least one self-organization network function, and notification to the high management level regarding at least one self-organization network function Between self-organizing network coordination information behaviors made, at least one of function-based and / or cell-based according to at least one self-organizing network control attribute, and / or on the basis of default coordination behavior. 26. An apparatus according to any one of claims 19 to 25, adapted to perform the selection. The low management level is an element or domain manager level and the high management level is a network manager level, or the low management level is a network element level and the high management level is an element or domain A manager level, or the low management level is a network element level, and the high management level is a network manager level.
27. Apparatus according to any one of claims 19 to 26. The device is operable in a self-organizing network, and / or the device is operable as or in a network element entity and / or element manager entity, and / or the device is at a low management level Operable as or in at least one self-organizing network function and / or self-organizing network coordination function, and / or the low management level and the high management level are each level of the operational support system, and / or Corresponding to each operation and maintenance level of the communication system, and / or the low and high management levels are linked via at least one of an Itf-N interface and an Itf-S interface;
28. Apparatus according to any one of claims 19 to 27. An interface configured to communicate with at least another device;
A memory configured to store computer program code;
A processor;
The processor comprises: the processor;
Receiving a notification of self-organization network coordination notifying an action of at least one self-organization network function at a low management level of the self-organization network from the low management level at a high management level of the self-organization network; and Coordinate notified actions for self-organizing network coordination at its high management level,
A device configured to accomplish this. Collect adjustment-related information from a lower management level that can be derived from the received notification and / or obtain adjustment-related information from a lower management level that can be derived from the received notification from a higher management level. Combine with adjustment related information,
30. The apparatus of claim 29, configured to accomplish this.   The notification includes a unique request for self-organizing network coordination, and the notified action is an intended action intended to be performed by at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level, to which 31. An apparatus according to claim 29 or 30, wherein a determination of self-organizing network coordination is required from a high administrative level, which comprises coordination-related profile information of at least one self-organizing network function. Making a self-organizing network coordination decision for the intended action according to coordination related profile information of at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level, and including a self-organizing network coordination decision for the intended action Issuing actions for self-organizing network coordination to lower management levels;
And the determination of the self-organizing network adjustment is one of confirmation of the intended action, rejection of the intended action, at least one action different from the intended action. 32. The apparatus of claim 31, corresponding to.   The notification includes information unique to the self-organizing network coordination, and the notified action is an executed action performed by at least one self-organizing network function at a low management level, and a higher management level includes 31. An apparatus according to claim 29 or 30, being notified about it for a self-organizing network coordination based. Making a self-organizing network coordination decision for the performed action at a low management level, and issuing actions for self-organizing network coordination including a self-organizing network coordination decision for the completed action to a low management level ,
The determination of the self-organizing network adjustment corresponds to one of at least one action different from the completed action and undoing of the completed action. The device described. The low management level is an element or domain manager level and the high management level is a network manager level, or the low management level is a network element level and the high management level is an element or domain A manager level, or the low management level is a network element level, and the high management level is a network manager level.
36. Apparatus according to any one of claims 29 to 35. The device is operable in a self-organizing network, and / or the device is operable as or in a network manager entity, and / or the device is self-organizing network coordination at a high management level. Operable and / or as a function, and / or the low management level and the high management level correspond to each level of operation support system and / or each operation and maintenance level of the communication system and / or low The management level and the higher management level are linked via at least one of an Itf-N interface and an Itf-S interface.
36. Apparatus according to any one of claims 29 to 35.   A computer comprising computer-executable computer program code configured to cause a computer to perform the method of any one of claims 1 to 10 or claim 11 to 18 when the program is executed on a computer. Program product.   38. The computer of claim 37, wherein the computer program product comprises a computer readable medium having stored computer executable computer program code, and / or the program can be loaded directly into an internal memory of a processor. Program product.

Images