Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

JP2008087093A - Abnormality detecting device for machine tool - Google Patents

Abnormality detecting device for machine tool Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2008087093A
JP2008087093A JP2006269508A JP2006269508A JP2008087093A JP 2008087093 A JP2008087093 A JP 2008087093A JP 2006269508 A JP2006269508 A JP 2006269508A JP 2006269508 A JP2006269508 A JP 2006269508A JP 2008087093 A JP2008087093 A JP 2008087093A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
machine tool
unit
signal
period
evaluation value
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2006269508A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Kazutaka Ikeda
和隆 池田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Panasonic Electric Works Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Matsushita Electric Works Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Matsushita Electric Works Ltd filed Critical Matsushita Electric Works Ltd
Priority to JP2006269508A priority Critical patent/JP2008087093A/en
Publication of JP2008087093A publication Critical patent/JP2008087093A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Machine Tool Sensing Apparatuses (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an abnormality detecting device for a machine tool, which detects the presence/absence of abnormality even when acceleration/deceleration is carried out during operation, by detecting a changing tendency of a waveform. <P>SOLUTION: A vibration sensor 1 is fixed to a driving device X of the machine tool, and detects vibrations generated from the driving device X. A signal cut-out portion 2 cuts out a signal in a specific period during the operation of the machine tool of signals outputted from the vibration sensor 1 as a target signal. An evaluation value computing portion 3 obtains time series data made from an effective value per unit period about the cut-out target signal as an evaluation value. A determining portion 4 compares a normal range set in advance and the evaluation value during the operation of the machine tool by using the evaluation value during the normal operation of the machine tool, and determines that an abnormality is generated in the machine tool when the evaluation value during the operation deviates from the normal range. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、工作機械において駆動部分の摩耗などによる劣化を検出する工作機械の異常検出装置に関するものである。   The present invention relates to an abnormality detection device for a machine tool that detects deterioration due to wear or the like of a drive part in a machine tool.

従来から、機器の異常徴候の早期検出のために機器の振動を監視する技術が提案されている。たとえば、回転機器において軸振動を検出するために振動検出器を設け、振動検出器の出力をサンプリングして得られる振幅について、現時点から過去のある定められた時間までの複数個から標準偏差を求め、この標準偏差が規定したしきい値以上になると、異常徴候があると判定する技術が知られている(たとえば、特許文献1参照)。
特開平2−232529号公報
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, a technique for monitoring vibration of equipment has been proposed for early detection of equipment abnormal signs. For example, a vibration detector is provided to detect shaft vibration in a rotating device, and the standard deviation of the amplitude obtained by sampling the output of the vibration detector is obtained from a plurality from the present time to a predetermined time in the past. A technique for determining that there is an abnormal sign when the standard deviation is equal to or greater than a prescribed threshold value is known (see, for example, Patent Document 1).
JP-A-2-232529

ところで、特許文献1に記載された技術は、振幅について求めた標準偏差が閾値以上になると異常と判定するものであるから、機器が定常的に動作している期間には異常の有無を判断することができるが、工作機械のように加減速を伴う機器では、正常動作であっても標準偏差が時間経過に伴って変化するから、特許文献1に記載された技術では異常の有無を検出できない場合がある。   By the way, since the technique described in Patent Document 1 determines that an abnormality occurs when the standard deviation obtained for the amplitude is equal to or greater than a threshold value, the presence or absence of an abnormality is determined during a period in which the device is operating steadily. However, in a machine with acceleration / deceleration such as a machine tool, the standard deviation changes with time even in normal operation, so the technique described in Patent Document 1 cannot detect the presence or absence of an abnormality. There is a case.

本発明は上記事由に鑑みて為されたものであり、その目的は、波形の変化傾向を検出することによって運転中に加減速を伴う場合でも異常の有無の検出を可能とした工作機械の異常検出装置を提供することにある。   The present invention has been made in view of the above-described reasons, and its purpose is to detect abnormalities in machine tools that enable detection of the presence or absence of abnormalities even when acceleration / deceleration is involved during operation by detecting the tendency of waveform changes. It is to provide a detection device.

請求項1の発明は、工作機械の動作を反映した信号を検出する信号検出部と、信号検出部から出力された信号のうち工作機械の運転中における特定期間の信号を対象信号として切り出す信号切出部と、対象信号の波形変化を数値化した評価値を求める評価値演算部と、工作機械の正常運転時における評価値を用いてあらかじめ設定した正常範囲と工作機械の運転時における評価値とを比較し運転時の評価値が正常範囲を逸脱しているときに工作機械の異常と判定する判定部とを備えることを特徴とする。   According to the first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a signal detection unit for detecting a signal reflecting the operation of the machine tool, and a signal cut-out for cutting out a signal of a specific period during operation of the machine tool as a target signal from the signals output from the signal detection unit. An output value, an evaluation value calculation unit for obtaining an evaluation value obtained by quantifying the change in the waveform of the target signal, a normal range set in advance using an evaluation value during normal operation of the machine tool, and an evaluation value during operation of the machine tool And a determination unit that determines that the machine tool is abnormal when the evaluation value during operation deviates from the normal range.

請求項2の発明では、請求項1の発明において、前記信号切出部は前記特定期間において一定の単位期間ごとの代表値を求め、前記評価値演算部は前記特定期間における各単位期間ごとの代表値の時系列データを評価値とし、前記判定部では、工作機械の正常運転時に得られた複数個の評価値を用いて各単位期間ごとの代表値の分布に基づいて各単位期間ごとの正常範囲を設定し、工作機械の運転時における各単位期間ごとに代表値と正常範囲とを比較し規定個数の単位期間において代表値が正常範囲を逸脱しているときに工作機械の異常と判定することを特徴とする。   According to a second aspect of the present invention, in the first aspect of the invention, the signal cut-out unit obtains a representative value for each fixed unit period in the specific period, and the evaluation value calculation unit calculates the representative value for each unit period in the specific period. The time series data of representative values is used as an evaluation value, and the determination unit uses a plurality of evaluation values obtained during normal operation of the machine tool based on the distribution of representative values for each unit period. Set the normal range, compare the representative value with the normal range for each unit period when the machine tool is operating, and determine that the machine tool is abnormal when the representative value deviates from the normal range for the specified number of unit periods It is characterized by doing.

請求項3の発明では、請求項1または請求項2の発明において、前記信号切出部は、前記工作機械の動作を指示する外部信号をトリガとして前記特定期間の開始時点を規定していることを特徴とする。   According to a third aspect of the present invention, in the first or second aspect of the invention, the signal cutout section defines a start time of the specific period with an external signal that instructs the operation of the machine tool as a trigger. It is characterized by.

請求項4の発明では、請求項1または請求項2の発明において、前記信号切出部は、一定の単位期間ごとの代表値を求めるとともに、単位期間の終了時点ごとに時間軸における前後の複数個の単位期間における代表値を規定の開始閾値と比較し、時間軸の後退側の第1の規定数の単位期間のうちの少なくとも1個の単位期間における代表値が開始閾値以下、かつ時間軸の前進側の第2の規定数の単位期間の代表値がいずれも開始閾値以上を開始条件として、開始条件を満たした後の複数個の単位期間を前記特定期間とすることを特徴とする。   According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, in the first or second aspect of the present invention, the signal cutout unit obtains a representative value for each fixed unit period, and at the end of the unit period, a plurality of front and rear parts on the time axis are obtained. The representative value in each unit period is compared with a prescribed start threshold, and the representative value in at least one unit period of the first prescribed number of unit periods on the backward side of the time axis is less than or equal to the start threshold, and the time axis Each of the second prescribed number of unit periods on the forward side is set to be a start condition, and a plurality of unit periods after satisfying the start condition are set as the specific period.

請求項5の発明では、請求項1ないし請求項4のいずれかの発明において、前記信号検出部は、前記工作機械の振動を検出する振動センサであることを特徴とする。   According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, in the invention according to any one of the first to fourth aspects, the signal detection unit is a vibration sensor that detects vibration of the machine tool.

請求項6の発明では、請求項1ないし請求項4のいずれかの発明において、前記工作機械はモータを駆動源とし、前記信号検出部はモータの負荷電流を検出する電流センサであることを特徴とする。   According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, in any one of the first to fourth aspects, the machine tool uses a motor as a drive source, and the signal detection unit is a current sensor that detects a load current of the motor. And

請求項1の発明の構成によれば、工作機械の運転中の特定期間に得られる対象信号の波形変化を数値化した評価値を求め、この評価値を正常範囲と比較することにより工作機械の異常の有無を判断するから、工作機械が定速で運転される場合だけではなく、時間経過に伴って運転速度が変化するように加減速を伴って運転される場合や、工具を取り換えて運転する場合であっても工作機械の異常の有無を判定することができる。   According to the configuration of the invention of claim 1, an evaluation value obtained by quantifying the waveform change of the target signal obtained during a specific period during operation of the machine tool is obtained, and the evaluation value is compared with the normal range. Since it is judged whether there is an abnormality, not only when the machine tool is operated at a constant speed, but also when it is operated with acceleration / deceleration so that the operation speed changes with time, or when the tool is replaced. Even if it is, the presence or absence of abnormality of the machine tool can be determined.

請求項2の発明の構成によれば、特定期間において複数の単位期間ごとの代表値の時系列データを用い、各単位期間ごとに代表値の分布に基づいて正常範囲か否かを評価するから、単位期間ごとの代表値の時間変化により振動波形を評価することができ、比較的少ない計算量で波形変化を評価することができる。   According to the configuration of the invention of claim 2, since time series data of representative values for a plurality of unit periods is used in a specific period, it is evaluated whether each unit period is within a normal range based on the distribution of representative values. The vibration waveform can be evaluated by the time change of the representative value for each unit period, and the waveform change can be evaluated with a relatively small amount of calculation.

ここに、代表値としては、実効値、包絡線のピーク値、特定周波数のレベルなどを用いることができる。ただし、以下に説明する実施形態では代表値として実効値を用いる例を示す。   Here, the effective value, the peak value of the envelope, the level of the specific frequency, and the like can be used as the representative value. However, in the embodiment described below, an example in which an effective value is used as a representative value is shown.

請求項3の発明の構成によれば、工作機械の動作を指示する外部信号によって特定期間の開始時点を決めるから、工作機械の運転中における特定期間の開始時点を実質的に同じタイミングとすることができ、定速での動作中のように波形変化がほとんど生じない場合だけではなく、特定期間において時間経過に伴って波形が変化する場合でも開始時点を一致させることによって、波形の比較が可能になる。   According to the configuration of the invention of claim 3, since the start point of the specific period is determined by the external signal instructing the operation of the machine tool, the start point of the specific period during operation of the machine tool is set to substantially the same timing. It is possible to compare waveforms by matching the start time not only when there is almost no waveform change as in constant speed operation, but also when the waveform changes over time in a specific period. become.

請求項4の発明の構成によれば、単位期間ごとの代表値の変化傾向に基づいて対象信号を切り出すタイミングを決めているから、工作機械から特定期間の開始時点を示す信号が得られない場合でも特定期間の開始時点を自動的に決定することができる。しかも、一定の規則に従って開始時点を決定しているから、特定期間の開始時点の決定を定式化し客観性を持たせた設定が可能になる。その結果、特定期間において時間経過に伴って波形が変化する場合でも開始時点を一致させることによって、波形の比較が可能になる。   According to the configuration of the invention of claim 4, since the timing for extracting the target signal is determined based on the change tendency of the representative value for each unit period, a signal indicating the start time of the specific period cannot be obtained from the machine tool. But it is possible to automatically determine the starting point of a specific period. Moreover, since the start time is determined according to a certain rule, the determination of the start time of the specific period can be formulated and set with objectivity. As a result, even when the waveform changes over time in the specific period, the waveforms can be compared by matching the start time points.

請求項5の発明の構成によれば、工作機械の振動の監視によって異常の有無を検出することができる。とくに、工作機械が回転部分を有する場合には回転軸の軸ぶれや軸受の摩耗による振動の増加を検出することができる。   According to the configuration of the invention of claim 5, it is possible to detect the presence or absence of abnormality by monitoring the vibration of the machine tool. In particular, when the machine tool has a rotating portion, it is possible to detect an increase in vibration due to shaft runout or bearing wear.

請求項6の発明の構成によれば、工作機械を駆動するモータの負荷電流を監視するから、可動部位の摩耗などによる負荷の増加を検出することができる。また、モータの負荷電流を監視するから、センサを用いることなく工作機械の異常の有無を検出することができる。   According to the configuration of the sixth aspect of the invention, since the load current of the motor that drives the machine tool is monitored, it is possible to detect an increase in load due to wear of the movable part. Further, since the load current of the motor is monitored, it is possible to detect whether there is an abnormality in the machine tool without using a sensor.

以下に説明する工作機械は、図2に示すように、モータを駆動源とする駆動装置Xを備え、駆動装置Xに工具Yを着脱可能に装着する構成であって、ワークに対する駆動装置Xの位置および駆動装置Xの運転速度がプログラムに従って制御されるものとする。この種の工作機械の例としては、単機能の工作機械のほか、マシニングセンタやターニングセンタのように、工具マガジンに保持された複数個の工具から使用する工具をプログラムに従って自動的に選択するものを用いてもよい。以下では、駆動装置Xとしてハウジング11を備えるスピンドルを想定する。   As shown in FIG. 2, the machine tool described below includes a drive device X that uses a motor as a drive source, and is configured to removably attach a tool Y to the drive device X. It is assumed that the position and the operating speed of the driving device X are controlled according to a program. Examples of this type of machine tool include a single-function machine tool, such as a machining center or turning center, which automatically selects a tool to be used from a plurality of tools held in a tool magazine according to a program. It may be used. Hereinafter, a spindle including the housing 11 is assumed as the driving device X.

本実施形態で説明する工作機械の異常検出装置は、図1に示すように、駆動装置Xのハウジング11に固着され駆動装置Xの振動を検出する振動センサ1を備え、振動センサ1にはセンサ線12を介して装置本体13が接続される。センサ線12は振動センサ1に付設されており、装置本体13に対してはコネクタなどによって着脱可能に接続される。また、センサ線12を通して対象信号に雑音成分が混入しないように、センサ線12にはシールド線を用いることが望ましい。   As shown in FIG. 1, the abnormality detection device for a machine tool described in the present embodiment includes a vibration sensor 1 that is fixed to a housing 11 of a drive device X and detects vibration of the drive device X. The vibration sensor 1 includes a sensor. The apparatus main body 13 is connected via the line 12. The sensor wire 12 is attached to the vibration sensor 1 and is detachably connected to the apparatus main body 13 by a connector or the like. Further, it is desirable to use a shielded wire for the sensor line 12 so that noise components are not mixed into the target signal through the sensor line 12.

振動センサ1としては加速度ピックアップを用いており、振動センサ1は、図2に示すように、駆動装置Xのハウジング11の外側面に密着させる形で取り付けられる。振動センサ1を駆動装置Xに取り付けるにあたっては、駆動装置Xの動作を妨げず、かつ駆動装置Xの動作によって取付状態の変化しないことが要求される。したがって、接着ないし溶着によって振動センサ1を駆動装置Xのハウジング11に固着する。また、振動センサ1の着脱を可能とするために、振動センサ1を着脱可能に結合する保持具をハウジング11に固着する構成を採用してもよい。   As the vibration sensor 1, an acceleration pickup is used, and the vibration sensor 1 is attached in close contact with the outer surface of the housing 11 of the driving device X as shown in FIG. 2. In attaching the vibration sensor 1 to the drive device X, it is required that the operation of the drive device X is not hindered and the attachment state is not changed by the operation of the drive device X. Therefore, the vibration sensor 1 is fixed to the housing 11 of the driving device X by adhesion or welding. Further, in order to allow the vibration sensor 1 to be attached and detached, a configuration in which a holder that removably couples the vibration sensor 1 to the housing 11 may be employed.

振動センサ1から出力される電気信号は工作機会の動作を反映した信号になるから、振動センサ1が信号検出部として機能する。振動センサ1から出力された信号は、信号切出部2に入力される。   Since the electrical signal output from the vibration sensor 1 is a signal reflecting the operation of the work opportunity, the vibration sensor 1 functions as a signal detection unit. The signal output from the vibration sensor 1 is input to the signal cutout unit 2.

信号切出部2では、駆動装置Xの運転開始の時点、つまり特定期間の開始時点を決定するために、工作機械の動作を指示する信号を用いることができる場合には、当該信号を外部信号としてトリガに用いる。つまり、駆動装置Xの運転開始の信号が与えられた時点を特定期間の開始時点とすればよい。また、この場合には、駆動装置Xの運転停止の信号も与えられると考えられるから、その時点を特定期間の終了時点とすればよい。   When the signal cutting unit 2 can use a signal instructing the operation of the machine tool in order to determine the operation start time of the drive device X, that is, the start time of the specific period, the signal is output as an external signal. As a trigger. That is, the time point at which the operation start signal of the drive device X is given may be set as the start time point of the specific period. Further, in this case, since it is considered that a signal for stopping the operation of the drive device X is also given, the time point may be set as the end point of the specific period.

一方、外部信号を用いることができない場合には、駆動装置Xの運転前と運転中とでは振動センサ1の出力振幅が大きく変化することを利用し、以下の手順で工作機械の運転中における特定期間の信号を対象信号として切り出す。ここで、駆動装置Xは、工具Yにより加工するワークの投入毎に運転と停止とを繰り返すものとする。   On the other hand, when an external signal cannot be used, the fact that the output amplitude of the vibration sensor 1 changes greatly before and during the operation of the drive device X is used to specify the machine tool during operation according to the following procedure. A period signal is extracted as a target signal. Here, it is assumed that the driving device X repeats the operation and the stop every time the work to be processed by the tool Y is input.

駆動装置Xの運転前には振動センサ1の出力振幅は微小であり、駆動装置Xの運転中には振動センサ1の出力振幅は運転前よりも大きくなる。そこで、特定期間を切り出すのに必要な適宜の時間分解能に応じて単位期間を決定し、信号切出部2において一定の単位期間ごとの振動センサ1の出力を監視する。ここでは、一例として単位期間を10msに設定するものとする。信号切出部2では、各単位期間の境界を着目点とし、着目点に対して時間軸の前後の複数個の単位期間における代表値(ここでは、実効値)を規定の開始閾値と比較する。なお、時間軸の後退側は過去側、時間軸の前進側は未来側を表している。   The output amplitude of the vibration sensor 1 is very small before the driving device X is operated, and the output amplitude of the vibration sensor 1 is larger than that before the driving device X is operating. Therefore, a unit period is determined in accordance with an appropriate time resolution necessary for cutting out the specific period, and the output of the vibration sensor 1 for each fixed unit period is monitored by the signal cutting unit 2. Here, as an example, the unit period is set to 10 ms. The signal cutout unit 2 uses the boundary of each unit period as a point of interest, and compares representative values (in this case, effective values) in a plurality of unit periods before and after the time axis with a specified start threshold. . The backward side of the time axis represents the past side, and the forward side of the time axis represents the future side.

時間軸の後退側では第1の規定数(たとえば3個)の単位期間について実効値を開始閾値と比較し、時間軸の前進側では第2の規定数(たとえば30個)の単位期間について実効値を開始閾値と比較する。ここで、後退側の単位期間のうちの少なくとも1個の実効値が開始閾値以下(条件A)であって、前進側の単位期間のすべての実効値が開始閾値以上(条件B)であることを開始条件とし、開始条件が満足されたときには、着目点を開始時点の候補とする。開始時点の候補では、着目点の前後同数個(たとえば3個)ずつの単位期間に相当する各時間内でのそれぞれの実効値の差分を求め、時間軸において前進側の次の単位期間の境界を着目点として同様の処理を行う。この処理は、最初に条件A,Bを満たした着目点から一定時間(たとえば、400ms)後まで繰り返して行う。   On the backward side of the time axis, the effective value is compared with the start threshold for the first specified number (for example, 3) unit periods, and on the forward side of the time axis, the effective value is calculated for the second specified number (for example, 30) unit periods. Compare the value to the start threshold. Here, at least one effective value in the backward unit period is equal to or less than the start threshold (condition A), and all effective values in the forward unit period are equal to or greater than the start threshold (condition B). Is a start condition, and when the start condition is satisfied, the point of interest is set as a candidate for the start time. In the starting point candidate, the difference between the effective values within each time corresponding to the same number of unit periods before and after the target point (for example, three) is obtained, and the boundary of the next unit period on the forward side on the time axis is obtained. The same processing is performed using as a point of interest. This process is repeated until a certain time (for example, 400 ms) from the point of interest that first satisfies the conditions A and B.

一方、着目点の前進側の単位期間のうちの1個でも開始閾値未満であるとき、つまり条件Bが満たされない場合には、次の単位期間の終了時点を着目点とし、条件A,Bを満足するか否かを判断する。また、条件Bは満足するが、着目点の後退側の単位期間のいずれもが開始閾値を超えるとき、つまり条件Aが満たされない場合には、着目点から第2の規定数(つまり30個)の単位期間を隔てた時点を着目点とし、この着目点について条件A,Bを満足するか否かを判断する。   On the other hand, when even one of the unit periods on the forward side of the target point is less than the start threshold, that is, when the condition B is not satisfied, the end point of the next unit period is set as the target point, and the conditions A and B are Determine if you are satisfied. In addition, when the condition B is satisfied but any of the unit periods on the backward side of the target point exceeds the start threshold value, that is, when the condition A is not satisfied, the second specified number (that is, 30) from the target point. A point of time separated by the unit period is taken as a point of interest, and it is determined whether conditions A and B are satisfied for this point of interest.

上述のように、最初の着目点から一定時間後までについて、上述の条件A,Bを満たすか否かを判定した後、条件A,Bをともに満たした着目点(開始時点の候補)のうちで、着目点の前後同数個ずつの単位期間に相当する時間内の実効値の差分が最大であった候補を開始時点に用いる。開始時点の決定を簡略化する場合には、最初の候補を開始時点に用いてもよい。   As described above, after determining whether or not the above-described conditions A and B are satisfied for a certain period of time after the first point of interest, among the points of interest (starting point candidates) that satisfy both of the conditions A and B Thus, the candidate having the largest difference in effective value within the time corresponding to the same number of unit periods before and after the target point is used as the start time. If the determination of the start time is simplified, the first candidate may be used as the start time.

一方、特定期間の開始時点を上述のようにして振動センサ1の出力から自動的に決定する場合に、終了時点は開始時点から一定時間後とすることが可能であるが、特定期間の終了時点も振動センサ1の出力から自動的に決定するのが望ましい。終了時点についても開始時点と同様に、単位期間の境界を着目点とし、着目点に対して時間軸の前後の複数個の単位期間における実効値を規定の終了閾値と比較する。ここで、着目点の前後の単位期間の個数は、開始時点とは異なっており、後退側の個数を第3の規定数(たとえば6個)とし、前進側の個数を第4の規定数(たとえば10個)とする。ここに、開始時点を求める際には時間軸の前進側に開始時点の候補を探索したが、終了時点を求める際には時間軸の後退側に開始時点の候補を探索する。   On the other hand, when the start time of the specific period is automatically determined from the output of the vibration sensor 1 as described above, the end time can be a certain time after the start time. It is desirable to determine automatically from the output of the vibration sensor 1 as well. As for the end point, similarly to the start point, the boundary of the unit period is set as a point of interest, and the effective values in a plurality of unit periods before and after the time axis with respect to the point of interest are compared with a specified end threshold value. Here, the number of unit periods before and after the point of interest is different from the start time, the backward number is the third specified number (for example, 6), and the forward number is the fourth specified number ( For example, 10). Here, when the start time is obtained, the start time candidate is searched for on the forward side of the time axis, but when the end time is obtained, the start time candidate is searched for on the backward side of the time axis.

終了時点の検出には、着目点について前進側の第4の規定数の単位期間のうちの少なくとも1個の実効値が終了閾値以下(条件C)であって、後退側の単位期間のすべての実効値が終了閾値以上(条件D)であることを終了条件とし、終了条件が満足されたときには、着目点を終了時点の候補とする。終了時点の候補では、着目点の前後に同数個(たとえば3個)ずつの単位時間に相当する各時間内でのそれぞれの実効値の差分を求めた後、時間軸の後退側で次の単位期間の境界を着目点として同じ処理を行う。この処理は、最初に条件C,Dを満たした着目点から一定時間(たとえば、200ms)前まで繰り返して行う。   For the detection of the end time, at least one effective value of the fourth specified number of unit periods on the forward side with respect to the point of interest is less than or equal to the end threshold (condition C), and all of the unit periods on the reverse side The effective value is equal to or greater than the end threshold (condition D) as an end condition, and when the end condition is satisfied, the point of interest is set as a candidate for the end time. In the end point candidate, after obtaining the difference between the effective values within each time corresponding to the same number of unit times (for example, 3) before and after the target point, the next unit on the backward side of the time axis The same processing is performed with the boundary of the period as the point of interest. This process is repeated until a certain time (for example, 200 ms) from the point of interest that first satisfies the conditions C and D.

条件Dが満足されない場合、つまり着目点から後退側の第3の規定数の単位期間のうち実効値が終了閾値未満のものが1個でもあると、次の着目点において上述の処理を繰り返す。また、条件Dが満たされても条件Cが満たされない場合には、第4の規定数から1を引いた個数(たとえば9個)の単位期間に相当する時間だけ後退側に移動させた時点を着目点とし、条件C,Dを満足するか否かを判断する。   If the condition D is not satisfied, that is, if there is at least one unit period whose effective value is less than the end threshold among the third specified number of unit periods on the backward side from the point of interest, the above processing is repeated at the next point of interest. Further, when the condition C is not satisfied even if the condition D is satisfied, the time point when the movement is made to the backward side by a time corresponding to the number of unit periods obtained by subtracting 1 from the fourth specified number (for example, 9). Whether or not the conditions C and D are satisfied is determined as a point of interest.

上述のように、最初の着目点から一定時間前までについて、上述の条件C,Dを満たすか否かを判定した後、条件C,Dをともに満たした着目点(終了時点の候補)のうちで、着目点の前後同数個ずつの単位期間に相当する時間内の実効値の差分が最大であった終了時点の候補を開始時点に用いる。開始時点の決定を簡略化する場合には、最初の候補を開始時点に用いてもよい。   As described above, after determining whether or not the above conditions C and D are satisfied for a certain period of time from the first point of interest, among the points of interest (candidates for end time) that satisfy both the conditions C and D Thus, the end point candidate where the difference in effective value within the time corresponding to the same number of unit periods before and after the target point is the maximum is used as the start point. If the determination of the start time is simplified, the first candidate may be used as the start time.

以上の説明から明らかなように、信号切出部2において振動センサ1の出力から開始時点と終了時点とを抽出するには、一連の動作が行われる間の振動センサ1の出力を記憶させておく必要がある。したがって、信号切出部2には、振動センサ1の出力を一定時間分(たとえば2000ms)記憶するFIFO(先入れ先出し)のメモリが必要である。   As is clear from the above description, in order to extract the start time point and the end time point from the output of the vibration sensor 1 in the signal cutout unit 2, the output of the vibration sensor 1 during a series of operations is stored. It is necessary to keep. Therefore, the signal extraction unit 2 needs a FIFO (first-in first-out) memory for storing the output of the vibration sensor 1 for a certain time (for example, 2000 ms).

上述の動作によって、信号切出部2では振動センサ1の出力から工作機械の運転中に相当する特定期間の対象信号を切り出すことができるから、この対象信号について波形変化を評価する。対象信号の波形変化、つまり時間経過に伴う振幅の変化を評価するために、対象信号は評価値演算部3に与えられる。   With the above-described operation, the signal cutout unit 2 can cut out the target signal for a specific period corresponding to the operation of the machine tool from the output of the vibration sensor 1, and the waveform change is evaluated for this target signal. In order to evaluate the change in the waveform of the target signal, that is, the change in the amplitude over time, the target signal is given to the evaluation value calculator 3.

評価値演算部3では、特定期間に含まれる単位期間の実効値を時間の進行方向に並べた時系列データを評価値に用いる。2つの時系列データが一致していれば、両時系列データの元になった対象信号はほぼ一致していると言える。ただし、対象信号にはばらつきがあり、信号切出部2による特定期間の切り出し位置には誤差があるから、評価値が完全に一致することは少ない。時系列データをベクトルとみなせば、工作機械が正常に運転されているときに得られた対象信号と、工作機械の運転中に得られる対象信号とのノルムは両者の一致度を反映する。しかしながら、工作機械が正常に運転されている場合であっても、時系列データは一定ではないから、ノルムを一致度とすることは実用的ではない。   The evaluation value calculation unit 3 uses, as an evaluation value, time series data in which effective values of unit periods included in a specific period are arranged in the time progression direction. If the two time-series data match, it can be said that the target signals that are the sources of the two time-series data are almost the same. However, there are variations in the target signal, and there is an error in the cut-out position of the specific period by the signal cut-out unit 2, so that the evaluation values rarely match completely. If the time-series data is regarded as a vector, the norm between the target signal obtained when the machine tool is operating normally and the target signal obtained while the machine tool is operating reflects the degree of coincidence between the two. However, even when the machine tool is operating normally, the time series data is not constant, so it is not practical to use the norm as the degree of coincidence.

そこで、評価演算部3で求めた評価値を判定部4に入力し、判定部4では工作機械の異常の有無を検査する前処理として、工作機械が正常に運転されているときの評価値を多数個収集し、収集した評価値について各単位期間ごとの実効値の分布に基づいて実効値の正常範囲を設定する。   Therefore, the evaluation value obtained by the evaluation calculation unit 3 is input to the determination unit 4, and the evaluation unit 4 determines the evaluation value when the machine tool is operating normally as pre-processing for inspecting whether there is an abnormality in the machine tool. A large number is collected, and a normal range of effective values is set based on the distribution of effective values for each unit period for the collected evaluation values.

正常範囲を設定するには、各単位期間ごとの実効値の分布を正規分布とみなし、各単位時間ごとに実効値の平均値と分散とを求めることにより分布の形を決定し、平均値に対して分散に適宜の係数を乗じた範囲を正常範囲とすればよい。このように正常範囲を設定しておけば、工作機械の異常の有無ないし異常の徴候を検査するにあたり、運転中に評価値を得るたびに正常範囲と比較することができ、工作機械の異常を迅速に検出することができる。   To set the normal range, the effective value distribution for each unit period is regarded as a normal distribution, the average value and the variance of the effective value are determined for each unit time, and the shape of the distribution is determined. On the other hand, a range obtained by multiplying the variance by an appropriate coefficient may be set as the normal range. If the normal range is set in this way, it can be compared with the normal range every time an evaluation value is obtained during operation in order to check the presence or absence of abnormality of the machine tool or the sign of abnormality. It can be detected quickly.

一方、工作機械の異常の徴候を検出する場合には必ずしも迅速な検出を要しないから、工作機械の運転中において複数回の特定期間について求めた評価値について、各単位期間ごとの実効値の分散を求め、正常時に得た分散に係数を乗じた値を閾値とし、閾値以下の範囲を正常範囲としてもよい。この場合、工作機械の運転時に得られる分散が閾値を超えると、異常の徴候あるいは異常があると判断することができる。   On the other hand, when detecting signs of machine tool abnormalities, rapid detection is not always required, so for the evaluation values obtained for a plurality of specific periods during operation of the machine tool, the variance of the effective value for each unit period A value obtained by multiplying the variance obtained during normality by a coefficient may be used as a threshold, and a range below the threshold may be used as a normal range. In this case, if the variance obtained during operation of the machine tool exceeds a threshold value, it can be determined that there is an abnormality sign or abnormality.

上述のように、工作機械の運転時に得られる評価値が正常範囲を逸脱するときには、判定部4では、工作機械に異常が生じているかあるいは異常の徴候が生じていると判定し、出力部5を通して使用者に異常を報知する。出力部5は表示灯や報知音を発生する装置のほか、ディスプレイ装置を用いて文字による報知を行ってもよい。   As described above, when the evaluation value obtained during operation of the machine tool deviates from the normal range, the determination unit 4 determines that an abnormality has occurred in the machine tool or a sign of abnormality has occurred, and the output unit 5 To inform the user of the abnormality. The output unit 5 may perform notification by characters using a display device in addition to a device that generates an indicator light and a notification sound.

上述の例では、振動センサ1の出力を対象信号に用いているが、駆動装置Xの駆動源がモータであるから、モータの負荷電流を対象信号に用いることが可能であり、モータがサーボ制御されている場合にはモータに設けたエンコーダの出力を対象信号に用いることも可能である。   In the above example, the output of the vibration sensor 1 is used for the target signal. However, since the drive source of the drive device X is a motor, the load current of the motor can be used for the target signal, and the motor is servo controlled. In this case, the output of the encoder provided in the motor can be used as the target signal.

本発明の実施形態を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows embodiment of this invention. 同上の概略構成図である。It is a schematic block diagram same as the above.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 振動センサ(信号入力部)
2 信号切出部
3 評価値演算部
4 判定部
5 出力部
11 ハウジング
12 センサ線
13 装置本体
X 駆動装置
Y 工具
1 Vibration sensor (signal input part)
2 Signal Extraction Unit 3 Evaluation Value Calculation Unit 4 Judgment Unit 5 Output Unit 11 Housing 12 Sensor Line 13 Device Main Body X Drive Device Y Tool

Claims (6)

工作機械の動作を反映した信号を検出する信号検出部と、信号検出部から出力された信号のうち工作機械の運転中における特定期間の信号を対象信号として切り出す信号切出部と、対象信号の波形変化を数値化した評価値を求める評価値演算部と、工作機械の正常運転時における評価値を用いてあらかじめ設定した正常範囲と工作機械の運転時における評価値とを比較し運転時の評価値が正常範囲を逸脱しているときに工作機械の異常と判定する判定部とを備えることを特徴とする工作機械の異常検出装置。   A signal detection unit that detects a signal reflecting the operation of the machine tool, a signal extraction unit that extracts a signal of a specific period during operation of the machine tool from the signals output from the signal detection unit, and a target signal An evaluation value calculation unit that obtains an evaluation value obtained by quantifying the waveform change, and a normal range set in advance using the evaluation value during normal operation of the machine tool and the evaluation value during operation of the machine tool are compared. An abnormality detection device for a machine tool, comprising: a determination unit that determines that the machine tool is abnormal when the value is out of a normal range. 前記信号切出部は前記特定期間において一定の単位期間ごとの代表値を求め、前記評価値演算部は前記特定期間における各単位期間ごとの代表値の時系列データを評価値とし、前記判定部では、工作機械の正常運転時に得られた複数個の評価値を用いて各単位期間ごとの代表値の分布に基づいて各単位期間ごとの正常範囲を設定し、工作機械の運転時における各単位期間ごとに代表値と正常範囲とを比較し規定個数の単位期間において代表値が正常範囲を逸脱しているときに工作機械の異常と判定することを特徴とする請求項1記載の工作機械の異常検出装置。   The signal extraction unit obtains a representative value for each unit period in the specific period, the evaluation value calculation unit uses time series data of the representative value for each unit period in the specific period as an evaluation value, and the determination unit The normal range for each unit period is set based on the distribution of representative values for each unit period using a plurality of evaluation values obtained during normal operation of the machine tool. 2. The machine tool according to claim 1, wherein the representative value is compared with the normal range for each period, and it is determined that the machine tool is abnormal when the representative value deviates from the normal range in a specified number of unit periods. Anomaly detection device. 前記信号切出部は、前記工作機械の動作を指示する外部信号をトリガとして前記特定期間の開始時点を規定していることを特徴とする請求項1または請求項2記載の工作機械の異常検出装置。   The abnormality detection of the machine tool according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the signal cut-out unit defines a start time of the specific period with an external signal instructing an operation of the machine tool as a trigger. apparatus. 前記信号切出部は、一定の単位期間ごとの代表値を求めるとともに、単位期間の終了時点ごとに時間軸における前後の複数個の単位期間における代表値を規定の開始閾値と比較し、時間軸の後退側の第1の規定数の単位期間のうちの少なくとも1個の単位期間における代表値が開始閾値以下、かつ時間軸の前進側の第2の規定数の単位期間の代表値がいずれも開始閾値以上を開始条件として、開始条件を満たした後の複数個の単位期間を前記特定期間とすることを特徴とする請求項1または請求項2記載の工作機械の異常検出装置。   The signal cutout unit obtains a representative value for each fixed unit period, compares the representative value in a plurality of unit periods before and after the time axis with a specified start threshold for each end point of the unit period, The representative value in at least one unit period of the first specified number of unit periods on the backward side of the second side is less than or equal to the start threshold value, and the representative value of the second specified number of unit periods on the forward side of the time axis is all 3. The machine tool abnormality detection device according to claim 1, wherein a plurality of unit periods after the start condition is satisfied are set as the specific period with a start threshold value or more as a start condition. 前記信号検出部は、前記工作機械の振動を検出する振動センサであることを特徴とする請求項1ないし請求項4のいずれか1項に記載の工作機械の異常検出装置。   5. The machine tool abnormality detection device according to claim 1, wherein the signal detection unit is a vibration sensor that detects vibration of the machine tool. 6. 前記工作機械はモータを駆動源とし、前記信号検出部はモータの負荷電流を検出する電流センサであることを特徴とする請求項1ないし請求項4のいずれか1項の記載の工作機械の異常検出装置。   5. The machine tool abnormality according to claim 1, wherein the machine tool uses a motor as a drive source, and the signal detection unit is a current sensor that detects a load current of the motor. Detection device.
JP2006269508A 2006-09-29 2006-09-29 Abnormality detecting device for machine tool Pending JP2008087093A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006269508A JP2008087093A (en) 2006-09-29 2006-09-29 Abnormality detecting device for machine tool

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006269508A JP2008087093A (en) 2006-09-29 2006-09-29 Abnormality detecting device for machine tool

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2008087093A true JP2008087093A (en) 2008-04-17

Family

ID=39371780

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006269508A Pending JP2008087093A (en) 2006-09-29 2006-09-29 Abnormality detecting device for machine tool

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2008087093A (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010048758A (en) * 2008-08-25 2010-03-04 Jfe Mechanical Co Ltd Abnormality diagnosis apparatus of device
JP2010054434A (en) * 2008-08-29 2010-03-11 Toshiba Corp Valve diagnostic method and valve diagnostic device
JP2019123006A (en) * 2018-01-19 2019-07-25 住友重機械工業株式会社 Press device and diagnostic method for press device
US11460005B2 (en) * 2016-03-17 2022-10-04 Ntn Corporation Condition monitoring system and wind turbine generation apparatus
CN115533616A (en) * 2022-08-26 2022-12-30 无锡微茗智能科技有限公司 Method, system and medium for realizing machine tool crash protection through vibration and load
WO2023092311A1 (en) * 2021-11-24 2023-06-01 蔡国志 High-resolution monitoring system and method for processing machine

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05116056A (en) * 1991-10-28 1993-05-14 Ritsukusu Kk Fault detecting device for machine tool
JP2000280140A (en) * 1999-03-31 2000-10-10 Mori Seiki Co Ltd Tool falling-off preventing device, and machine tool provided with same
JP2001157949A (en) * 1999-11-30 2001-06-12 Natl Inst Of Advanced Industrial Science & Technology Meti Apparatus and method for processing signal of cutting tool having wear sensor

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05116056A (en) * 1991-10-28 1993-05-14 Ritsukusu Kk Fault detecting device for machine tool
JP2000280140A (en) * 1999-03-31 2000-10-10 Mori Seiki Co Ltd Tool falling-off preventing device, and machine tool provided with same
JP2001157949A (en) * 1999-11-30 2001-06-12 Natl Inst Of Advanced Industrial Science & Technology Meti Apparatus and method for processing signal of cutting tool having wear sensor

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010048758A (en) * 2008-08-25 2010-03-04 Jfe Mechanical Co Ltd Abnormality diagnosis apparatus of device
JP2010054434A (en) * 2008-08-29 2010-03-11 Toshiba Corp Valve diagnostic method and valve diagnostic device
US11460005B2 (en) * 2016-03-17 2022-10-04 Ntn Corporation Condition monitoring system and wind turbine generation apparatus
JP2019123006A (en) * 2018-01-19 2019-07-25 住友重機械工業株式会社 Press device and diagnostic method for press device
WO2023092311A1 (en) * 2021-11-24 2023-06-01 蔡国志 High-resolution monitoring system and method for processing machine
CN115533616A (en) * 2022-08-26 2022-12-30 无锡微茗智能科技有限公司 Method, system and medium for realizing machine tool crash protection through vibration and load

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP7338743B2 (en) Diagnostic device, diagnostic method, program and diagnostic system
CN106181581B (en) Vibration information display device for machine tool
JP7085370B2 (en) Diagnostic equipment, diagnostic systems, diagnostic methods and programs
JP6156566B2 (en) Diagnostic device, diagnostic method, program, and diagnostic system
CN101226387B (en) Control unit
JP2008087093A (en) Abnormality detecting device for machine tool
JP4860444B2 (en) Abnormality detection method in cutting
JP5937727B1 (en) Tool wear evaluation device
CA2098943A1 (en) System and method for dectecting cutting tool failure
JP7151108B2 (en) Information processing device, information processing method and program
JP2010149206A (en) Cutting monitoring device, cutting device, cutting monitoring method, and cutting method
JP2019207126A (en) Abnormality diagnosis system and oscillation sensor
JP2006130604A (en) Detection method and detection device for abrasion of blade of cutter and cutter
WO2018169069A1 (en) Diagnosis device, diagnosis system, diagnosis method, and program
US11841294B2 (en) Diagnosis device, diagnosis system, and computer-readable medium
JP2019159759A (en) Processing section determination device, processing section determination method, program, and diagnostic device
EP4237922A1 (en) Diagnostic apparatus, machining system, diagnostic method, and recording medium
JP2008087092A (en) Abnormality detecting device for tool
JP2020157447A (en) Detection device, processing device, and program
JP2018156340A (en) Diagnosis device, diagnosis system, diagnosis method and program
JP7084242B2 (en) Tool blade number estimation device and machine tools equipped with it, and tool blade number estimation method
JP2010105082A (en) Cutting tool abnormality detection device
JPH0885047A (en) Cutter tip abrasion detecting method for cutting tool
JP7427938B2 (en) Diagnostic device, diagnostic device control method and program
JPWO2021049568A1 (en) Vibration detection device, vibration detection method and abnormality judgment system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20080108

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20090918

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20090929

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20091130

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20100330