Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

EP2143081B1 - Method and device for testing value documents - Google Patents

Method and device for testing value documents Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2143081B1
EP2143081B1 EP08749044.7A EP08749044A EP2143081B1 EP 2143081 B1 EP2143081 B1 EP 2143081B1 EP 08749044 A EP08749044 A EP 08749044A EP 2143081 B1 EP2143081 B1 EP 2143081B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
group
connection strength
value document
value
measuring
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP08749044.7A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2143081A1 (en
Inventor
Shanchuan Su
Jürgen Schützmann
Helmut Sleidl
Dieter Stein
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Giesecke and Devrient Currency Technology GmbH
Original Assignee
Giesecke and Devrient Currency Technology GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Giesecke and Devrient Currency Technology GmbH filed Critical Giesecke and Devrient Currency Technology GmbH
Publication of EP2143081A1 publication Critical patent/EP2143081A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2143081B1 publication Critical patent/EP2143081B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07DHANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/06Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using wave or particle radiation
    • G07D7/12Visible light, infrared or ultraviolet radiation

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for checking value documents, in particular for detecting forged value documents, and to an apparatus for carrying out the method.
  • the forged value documents to be recognized are composed counterfeit orders, which are composed of parts of different value documents.
  • the composed counterfeits can be composed of parts of genuine and forged value documents, but there are also known composite counterfeits, which are composed exclusively of parts of real value documents.
  • the US4464786A discloses to use a line sensor for checking banknotes, by which the banknote is optically scanned line by line.
  • a kind of gradient value S (i) along the line (X) is calculated for each "picture element" i.
  • the counter G provides information about how often the detected intensity changes along the respective line. At the unprinted edges of the banknote, G is small because the detected signal hardly changes along such a line. For the lines in which there are printed characters of the banknote ("character row”), G is large. Based on the comparison of the counter G with the "second standard data", the "character rows" 11a, 11b, 11c of the banknote are found.
  • the position of the printed area of the banknote is calculated from the position of the "character rows.”
  • the pattern found in the printed area of the banknote is compared with a standard pattern, and the similarity of the two patterns determines the authenticity or type of banknote.
  • the gradient values S (i) are used only for locating the printed area of the banknote, but not for checking the banknote itself. Instead, the banknote is checked on the basis of the detected signals themselves ("detected pattern" of the printed image of the banknote).
  • the US4464786A but does not deal with checking the bill for the presence of dividing lines where the parts of a composed counterfeit are composed.
  • the EP0947964 A discloses a method of examining securities in which samples of the security are detected in rows and columns. The samples of each column are added to a total value each, reducing the area to a single resulting row. The sum values of the resulting row are subjected to pattern recognition. Not every single one of these pattern recognition Sample value must be compared with a corresponding default value, but only the respective sum value, thus simplifying the evaluation of the samples. However, only the samples themselves are added up or linked together, but no gradient values.
  • the DE202005021081 U1 discloses a sensor for checking the authenticity of a banknote which is movable relative to a transport device which transports the banknote in order to allow different scanning curves on the banknote.
  • the signal intensities of a measurement signal are determined at a plurality of measurement points on a value document. Subsequently, a group of these measuring points is selected, whereby the selection of the group takes place in dependence on a typical separating line position on the value document. Alternatively, the group of measurement points can be selected even before the determination of the signal intensities.
  • gradient values of the signal intensities for the measuring points of the group are determined. To determine a connection strength of the group, the Gradient values within the group are linked together, whereby the connection strength of the group is determined by forming a product or a sum of the gradient values of the group. The connection strength is evaluated, for example, by comparing the connection strength to a reference connection strength that applies to the group.
  • the method according to the invention serves to detect forged value documents, for example for the detection of composed counterfeits.
  • the value document is thus checked for the presence of dividing lines on which the value document is composed or in which individual components are connected to form the value document.
  • a composed counterfeit may have one or more dividing lines on which it is composed.
  • connection strength Comparing the connection strength with the associated reference connection strength results in a difference that is specific to the selected group of measurement points.
  • the evaluation of the size of the difference can be done in addition to a simple comparison, whether the ever average connection strength is less than or greater than the corresponding reference connection strength. From the difference or from the size of the difference, a probability can be derived that a dividing line or at least a partial section of a dividing line is arranged in the respective group of measuring points. If the connection strength greatly exceeds the reference connection strength, for example above a certain threshold value, a higher probability of the existence of a separation line can be concluded within the measurement points of the respective group than, for example, if the reference connection strength is just exceeded.
  • At least one profile of the signal intensity of the measurement signal is determined as a function of the location on the value document, e.g. a two-dimensional distribution of the signal intensity.
  • the two-dimensional distribution of the signal intensity can be determined over the entire value document or also over one or more subareas of the value document.
  • connection strength of the respective group of measuring points provides a quantitative statement as to how far a large gradient value exists throughout the group, in particular along a specific direction on the value document.
  • connection strength the product of the gradient values within the group or also their sum is formed.
  • the signal intensities are normalized to reference intensities, which are preferably specific to the respective Are measuring point.
  • the signal intensities are standardized, for example at each of the measuring points, to a reference intensity valid for the respective measuring point.
  • the reference intensities can be determined on the basis of a large number of genuine value documents or determined in advance of the test.
  • the reference intensity of a measuring point can be given by an average value of the signal intensities determined for the respective measuring point on the basis of the plurality of value documents.
  • the reference connecting strength valid for a group of measuring points can also be determined on the basis of a multiplicity of genuine value documents or determined in advance of the test.
  • the reference connection strength of a group may be given by an average of connection strengths determined for the respective group of measurement points from the plurality of value documents.
  • the reference intensities and / or the reference connection strengths are determined on the basis of value documents of the type of the value document to be checked, in the case of banknotes, for example, on the basis of banknotes of the same denomination.
  • Specific reference intensities and / or specific reference connection strengths can each be stored for the different types of value documents.
  • the reference intensities and / or the reference connection strengths may be selected based on the type of value document, for example the currency and denomination of a banknote.
  • the type of value document is identified, for example, before the value document is checked. In the case of banknotes can this identification, for example, be a denomination determination preceding the method according to the invention.
  • the first derivative of the signal intensity along a first direction is formed on the value document.
  • the gradient value of the signal intensity at the respective measurement point may be proportional to the absolute value of the first derivative of the signal intensity at the respective measurement point, the first derivative being formed along the first direction on the value document.
  • At least one difference from the signal intensity at the respective measuring point and the signal intensity at at least one adjacent measuring point is formed for each of the measuring points of the selected group for determining the respective gradient value, wherein the adjacent measuring points along a first direction on the value document to the respective measuring point are adjacent.
  • the gradient value of the signal intensity at the respective measuring point may be proportional to the absolute value of the difference, which is formed from the signal intensity at the respective measuring point and the signal intensity at at least one adjacent measuring point.
  • the first direction preferably runs along a transport direction of the value document, in particular approximately parallel to a longitudinal direction of the document of value or approximately perpendicular to the longitudinal direction, ie approximately parallel to the shorter side of the document of value.
  • the value document is guided past a sensor along the transport direction, with which the signal intensities of the measurement signal are determined.
  • the measuring points of the group are arranged along a second direction on the value document.
  • the second direction preferably runs at a non-zero angle to the first direction, for example, vertically to the first direction.
  • an optical measuring signal is used as the measuring signal, which is in particular in the visible or in the non-visible spectral range.
  • the measurement signal may be a luminescence signal which is emitted by the value document, for example a luminescence signal excited by UV light, in particular a fluorescence signal.
  • At least one further group of the measuring points is selected, at which the signal intensity of the measuring signal is determined.
  • selecting the further groups may be done immediately after selecting the previously selected group.
  • the selection of the further groups may also be made during or after performing one or more of the method steps of the invention following selection of the previously selected group, such as after determining the connection strength for the previously selected group.
  • further gradient values of the signal intensities for the measuring points of the respective further group are determined.
  • the further gradient values are linked to one another.
  • the further connection strength is evaluated.
  • the further connection strength is compared, for example, with a further reference connection strength, which was determined for the measurement points of the respective further group, eg on the basis of genuine value documents.
  • For the different selected groups can use the same or individual reference connection strengths.
  • connection strength and / or the further connection strength exceeds the reference connection strength valid for the respective group, then there is a high probability that within the measurement points of this group at least a partial section of a separation line runs.
  • the tested value document can then be sorted out with suspicion of the existence of a composed forgery.
  • the selection of which measurement points are grouped together is based on the positions of a value document in which the dividing lines of composed forgeries are typically placed.
  • the selection of the group therefore takes place as a function of a typical parting line position on the value document, the typical parting line position being determined on the basis of a plurality of forged value documents.
  • the groups of the measuring points can then be selected for the method according to the invention.
  • the selection of groups is e.g. in such a way that the entire value document or a subarea of the value document is checked for the presence of parting lines.
  • the selection of the further groups can also be made depending on the connection strength of the previously selected group or of several previously selected groups.
  • the selection of the further groups can also be dependent on at least one difference between the connection strength of at least one previously selected group and the Reference connection strength of at least one previously selected group.
  • the further groups can be used to check a part of the area and / or an immediate area of the area that has already been checked by the first group. If, for example, a relatively large connecting strength of a first group of measuring points indicates an indication of a possible dividing line - if e.g. a subsection of a non-rectilinear separation line is detected - so further groups of measurement points in the immediate vicinity of the first group could be selected. With the aid of the further groups, the suspect area of the value document and / or its immediate surroundings can be checked at different angles
  • the further groups may contain or be a subset of one or more previously selected groups. With the help of the other groups, a subarea of a previously tested area can also be checked.
  • the measuring points of a plurality of selected groups are arranged parallel to one another on the value document.
  • the measurement points of the selected groups may also be arranged along different directions on the value document.
  • This device preferably has a sensor for determining the signal intensities of the measurement signal.
  • the sensor may be an image sensor for detecting optical features of value documents, for example banknotes, and preferably has at least one detector line for determining the signal intensities of the measurement signal.
  • FIG. 1a schematically a composed forgery 1 is shown, which is composed of two parts, for example, a left, real part banknote 1a and a right, wrong partial banknote 1b.
  • a security element 3 is shown by way of example, which fluoresces under UV illumination.
  • the composed counterfeit 1 is moved under a detector line 5 along the transport direction x marked with the arrow 4.
  • the detector row 5 is part of a sensor for checking value documents which detects the signal intensity of the fluorescence of the composed forgery 1 to be tested as a function of time or as a function of the location x on the composed counterfeit 1.
  • the detector row 5 has a plurality of measuring tracks, which are arranged perpendicular to the transport direction (in the y-direction), inter alia the two measuring tracks m and m + 1, the signals of which are considered below by way of example.
  • the Figures 1b and 1c show the signal intensity s m of the measuring track m and the gradient values g m of the measuring track m and the signal intensity s m + 1 of the measuring track m + 1 and the gradient values g m + 1 of the measuring track m + 1 as a function of the location x on the composed counterfeit 1.
  • the signal intensities s m and s m + 1 have a clear jump at the location x T , the intersection of the x-axis with the dividing line 2, which results from different fluorescence properties of the real partial bank note 1 a and the incorrect partial bank note 1 b.
  • the measuring track m is a significantly increased Signal intensity in the area of the fluorescent security element 3 to recognize.
  • the signal intensity s m + 1 has no increased signal intensity at the x-coordinates of the security element 3, since the measuring track m + 1 no longer detects the fluorescence of the security element 3.
  • the gradient values g m and g m + 1 result from the signal intensities s m and s m + 1, respectively, by calculating the absolute value of the first derivative of the respective signal intensity in the transport direction x.
  • each of the signal intensities also from the other measuring tracks of the detector line 5 s 1, s 2, ... and the corresponding gradient values g 1, g 2 determines .... This yields a two-dimensional distribution of the signal intensities and the gradient values over the entire composed counterfeiting 1.
  • the gradient values g m and g m + 1 not only the gradient values g m and g m + 1 but also the gradient values of the remaining measurement tracks have a peak corresponding to a jump of the respective signal intensity.
  • FIG. 2a illustrates the two-dimensional arrangement of the measuring points, which are represented as cells of a grid in the xy-plane, and their position with respect to the composed counterfeiting 1.
  • Each measuring line of the detector line 5 corresponds to one line of the grid.
  • a plurality of groups of measuring points are formed.
  • the measuring points of each group are each arranged along a specific direction on the value document.
  • FIG. 2b shows by way of example three groups a, b, c whose measuring points are arranged along the y-direction and parallel to one another.
  • the measuring points of the three groups a, b, c are chosen such that the signal intensities in the area of the dividing line 2 and in their immediate surroundings are detected on them.
  • connection strengths V a, V b are then compared V c of the groups with the reference connection strengths Ra, Rb, Rc, which apply to the respective group and for example have been determined in advance of the examination based real value documents.
  • connection strengths V a and V c are significantly smaller than the respective reference connection strength Ra or Rc.
  • connection strength Vb is significantly greater than the corresponding reference connection strength Rb. It can be concluded from the comparatively large connection strength Vb that within the measuring points of the group b a separation line 2 is likely to run. The tested value document can thus be sorted out with suspicion of the presence of a composed counterfeit 1.
  • FIG. 3 Examples of further groups a'-e 'of measuring points are shown.
  • several, arbitrarily selected measuring points can be used as output measuring point.
  • the measuring points of the groups d 'and e' are arranged parallel to one another and run at a non-zero angle to the transport direction x over a subsection of the value document 1.
  • the measuring points lying at the edge of the value document 1 were excluded in the groups d 'and e'.
  • these groups can also composed fakes be recognized, whose dividing lines run obliquely over the composed counterfeiting.
  • the measurement points of a group can also be arranged so that they do not lie in a line.
  • the measurement points of a group may also lie on a curve and / or the arrangement of the measurement points may have an offset, e.g. to detect composed counterfeits with corresponding dividing lines.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)

Description

Die Erfindung betrifft ein Verfahren zur Prüfung von Wertdokumenten, insbesondere zur Erkennung gefälschter Wertdokumente, und eine Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens. Bei den zu erkennenden gefälschten Wertdokumenten handelt es sich um composed-Fälschurigen, die aus Teilen unterschiedlicher Wertdokumente zusammengesetzt sind. Die composed-Fälschungen können aus Teilen echter und gefälschter Wertdokumente zusammengesetzt sein, es sind aber auch composed-Fälschungen bekannt, die ausschließlich aus Teilen echter Wertdokumente zusammengesetzt sind.The invention relates to a method for checking value documents, in particular for detecting forged value documents, and to an apparatus for carrying out the method. The forged value documents to be recognized are composed counterfeit orders, which are composed of parts of different value documents. The composed counterfeits can be composed of parts of genuine and forged value documents, but there are also known composite counterfeits, which are composed exclusively of parts of real value documents.

Aus dem Stand der Technik sind verschiedene Verfahren zur Erkennung gefälschter Banknoten bekannt. Composed-Fälschungen, deren einzelnen Teile mit Klebestreifen zusammengeklebt sind, lassen sich in manchen Fällen indirekt über die Erkennung der Klebestreifen mit Hilfe einer Reflexionsmessung ausfindig machen. Dies ist jedoch nicht in jedem Fall einer zusammengeklebten composed-Fälschung möglich. Zur Echtheitsprüfung werden die Banknoten darüber hinaus beispielsweise auf Eigenschaften geprüft, die echtes Banknotenpapier von gewöhnlichem Papier unterscheidet, so zum Beispiel auf dessen Fluoreszenzeigenschaften. Viele composed-Fälschungen bestehen teilweise aus echtem und teilweise aus gefälschtem Papier, das jedoch ähnliche Fluoreszenzeigenschaften wie echte Banknoten besitzt. Außerdem werden auch Fälschungen zusammengesetzt, die ausschließlich aus Teilen echter Banknoten bestehen. Mit den bisherigen Verfahren ist es nicht möglich, solche zusammengesetzten Fälschungen zuverlässig zu erkennen, die vergleichbare Messsignale, z.B. Fluoreszenzsignale, wie echte Banknoten liefern.Various methods for detecting counterfeit banknotes are known from the prior art. Composed counterfeits whose individual parts are glued together with adhesive strips can in some cases be detected indirectly by detecting the adhesive strips with the help of a reflection measurement. However, this is not possible in every case of a glued together compositional counterfeit. In addition, for authenticity testing, the banknotes are checked, for example, for properties that distinguish genuine banknote paper from ordinary paper, such as its fluorescence properties. Many composed counterfeits are partly made of genuine and partly fake paper, but have similar fluorescence properties to real banknotes. In addition, counterfeits consisting solely of parts of genuine banknotes are also put together. With the previous methods, it is not possible to reliably detect such composite counterfeits which have comparable measurement signals, e.g. Deliver fluorescence signals, like real banknotes.

Die US4464786 A offenbart, zur Prüfung von Banknoten einen Zeilensensor zu verwenden, durch den die Banknote zeilenweise optisch abgetastet wird.The US4464786A discloses to use a line sensor for checking banknotes, by which the banknote is optically scanned line by line.

Aus den entlang einer Zeile detektierten Signalen D(i) wird für jedes "picture element" i eine Art Gradientenwert S(i) entlang der Zeile (X) berechnet. Jeder Gradientenwert S(i) wird mit dem vorgegebenen Wert 50 verglichen, und für jeden Gradientenwert S(i), der 50 überschreitet wird C(i)=1 gesetzt und der Zähler G um 1 hochgezählt. Der Zähler G gibt Auskunft darüber, wie oft sich die detektierte Intensität entlang der jeweiligen Zeile ändert. An den unbedruckten Rändern der Banknote ist G klein, da sich das detektierte Signal entlang einer solchen Zeile kaum ändert. Für die Zeilen, in denen gedruckte Zeichen der Banknote vorliegen ("character row"), ist G dagegen groß. Anhand des Vergleichs des Zählers G mit den "second standard data" werden die "character rows" 11a, 11b, 11c der Banknote gefunden. Aus der Lage der "character rows" wird die Lage des bedruckten Bereichs der Banknote berechnet, Das im bedruckten Bereich der Banknote gefundene Muster wird mit einem Standardmuster verglichen und aus der Ähnlichkeit der beiden Muster wird die Echtheit oder Art der Banknote bestimmt. In der US4464786 A werden die Gradientenwerte S(i) nur zur Lokalisierung des bedruckten Bereichs der Banknote verwendet, aber nicht zum Prüfen der Banknote selbst. Die Prüfung der Banknote wird stattdessen anhand der detektierten Signale selbst ("detected pattern" des Druckbilds der Banknote) durchgeführt. Die US4464786 A beschäftigt sich aber nicht mit dem Prüfen der Banknote auf das Vorhandensein von Trennlinien, an denen die Teile einer composed-Fälschung zusammengesetzt sind.From the signals D (i) detected along a line, a kind of gradient value S (i) along the line (X) is calculated for each "picture element" i. Each gradient value S (i) is compared with the predetermined value 50, and for each gradient value S (i) exceeding 50, C (i) = 1 is set and the counter G is incremented by one. The counter G provides information about how often the detected intensity changes along the respective line. At the unprinted edges of the banknote, G is small because the detected signal hardly changes along such a line. For the lines in which there are printed characters of the banknote ("character row"), G is large. Based on the comparison of the counter G with the "second standard data", the "character rows" 11a, 11b, 11c of the banknote are found. The position of the printed area of the banknote is calculated from the position of the "character rows." The pattern found in the printed area of the banknote is compared with a standard pattern, and the similarity of the two patterns determines the authenticity or type of banknote. In the US4464786A For example, the gradient values S (i) are used only for locating the printed area of the banknote, but not for checking the banknote itself. Instead, the banknote is checked on the basis of the detected signals themselves ("detected pattern" of the printed image of the banknote). The US4464786A but does not deal with checking the bill for the presence of dividing lines where the parts of a composed counterfeit are composed.

Die EP0947964 A offenbart ein Verfahren zur Prüfung von Wertpapieren, bei dem Abtastwerte des Wertpapiers in Zeilen und Spalten detektiert werden. Die Abtastwerte jeder Spalte werden zu jeweils einem Gesamtwert aufaddiert, so dass die Fläche quasi auf eine einzige resultierende Zeile reduziert wird. Die Summenwerte der resultierenden Zeile werden einer Mustererkennung unterzogen. Da bei dieser Mustererkennung nicht jeder einzelne Abtastwert mit einem entsprechenden Standardwert verglichen werden muss, sondern nur der jeweilige Summenwert, vereinfacht sich so die Auswertung der Abtastwerte. Jedoch werden nur die Abtastwerte selbst aufaddiert bzw, miteinander verknüpft, aber keine Gradientenwerte.The EP0947964 A discloses a method of examining securities in which samples of the security are detected in rows and columns. The samples of each column are added to a total value each, reducing the area to a single resulting row. The sum values of the resulting row are subjected to pattern recognition. Not every single one of these pattern recognition Sample value must be compared with a corresponding default value, but only the respective sum value, thus simplifying the evaluation of the samples. However, only the samples themselves are added up or linked together, but no gradient values.

Die DE202005021081 U1 offenbart einen Sensor zur Echtheitsprüfung einer Banknote, der gegenüber einer Transporteinrichtung, die die Banknote transportiert, beweglich ist, um verschiedene Abtastkurven auf der Banknote zu ermöglichen.The DE202005021081 U1 discloses a sensor for checking the authenticity of a banknote which is movable relative to a transport device which transports the banknote in order to allow different scanning curves on the banknote.

Es ist daher eine Aufgabe der Erfindung, eine einfache Möglichkeit zur zu verlässigen Erkennung gefälschter Wertdokumente, insbesondere von composed-Fälschungen anzugeben.It is therefore an object of the invention to provide an easy way to reliable detection of forged value documents, in particular of composed counterfeits.

Diese Aufgabe wird durch die Merkmale der unabhängigen Ansprüche gelöst. In davon abhängigen Ansprüchen sind vorteilhafte Ausgestaltungen und Weiterbildungen der Erfindung angegeben.This object is solved by the features of the independent claims. In dependent claims advantageous embodiments and developments of the invention are given.

Bei dem erfindungsgemäßen Verfahren werden in einem ersten Schritt die Signalintensitäten eines Messsignals an mehreren Messpunkten auf einem Wertdokument bestimmt. Anschließend wird eine Gruppe dieser Messpunkte ausgewählt, wobei die Auswahl der Gruppe in Abhängigkeit einer typischen Trennlinienposition auf dem Wertdokument erfolgt. Alternativ dazu kann die Gruppe von Messpunkten auch schon vor der Bestimmung der Signalintensitäten ausgewählt werden. In einem weiteren Schritt werden Gradientenwerte der Signalintensitäten für die Messpunkte der Gruppe bestimmt. Zur Ermittlung einer Verbindungsstärke der Gruppe werden die Gradientenwerte innerhalb der Gruppe miteinander verknüpft wobei die Verbindungsstärke der Gruppe durch Bildung eines Produkts oder einer Summe der Gradientenwerte der Gruppe ermittelt wird. Die Verbindungsstärke wird ausgewertet, beispielsweise durch Vergleichen der Verbindungsstärke mit einer für die Gruppe geltenden Referenz-Verbindungsstärke.In the method according to the invention, in a first step, the signal intensities of a measurement signal are determined at a plurality of measurement points on a value document. Subsequently, a group of these measuring points is selected, whereby the selection of the group takes place in dependence on a typical separating line position on the value document. Alternatively, the group of measurement points can be selected even before the determination of the signal intensities. In a further step, gradient values of the signal intensities for the measuring points of the group are determined. To determine a connection strength of the group, the Gradient values within the group are linked together, whereby the connection strength of the group is determined by forming a product or a sum of the gradient values of the group. The connection strength is evaluated, for example, by comparing the connection strength to a reference connection strength that applies to the group.

Das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren dient zur Erkennung gefälschter Wertdokumente, beispielsweise zur Erkennung von composed-Fälschungen. Das Wertdokument wird damit auf das Vorhandensein von Trennlinien geprüft, an denen das Wertdokument zusammengesetzt ist bzw. an denen einzelne Bestandteile zur Bildung des Wertdokuments miteinander verbunden sind. Im Allgemeinen kann eine composed-Fälschung eine Trennlinie oder mehrere Trennlinien aufweisen, an denen sie zusammengesetzt ist.The method according to the invention serves to detect forged value documents, for example for the detection of composed counterfeits. The value document is thus checked for the presence of dividing lines on which the value document is composed or in which individual components are connected to form the value document. In general, a composed counterfeit may have one or more dividing lines on which it is composed.

Aus dem Vergleich der Verbindungsstärke mit der zugehörigen Referenz-Verbindungsstärke ergibt sich ein Unterschied, der für die ausgewählte Gruppe von Messpunkten spezifisch ist. Der Auswertung der Größe des Unterschieds kann zusätzlich zu einem einfachen Vergleich erfolgen, ob die je weilige Verbindungsstärke kleiner oder größer als die zugehörige Referenz-Verbindungsstärke ist. Aus dem Unterschied bzw. aus der Größe des Unterschieds kann eine Wahrscheinlichkeit dafür abgeleitet werden kann, dass in der jeweiligen Gruppe von Messpunkten eine Trennlinie oder zumindest ein Teilabschnitt einer Trennlinie angeordnet ist. Für den Fall, dass die Verbindungsstärke die Referenz-Verbindungsstärke stark überschreitet z.B. über einen bestimmten Schwellwert, lässt sich innerhalb der Messpunkte der jeweiligen Gruppe auf eine höhere Wahrscheinlichkeit für das Vorliegen einer Trennlinie schließen als z.B. bei nur knapper Überschreitung der Referenz-Verbindungsstärke.Comparing the connection strength with the associated reference connection strength results in a difference that is specific to the selected group of measurement points. The evaluation of the size of the difference can be done in addition to a simple comparison, whether the ever average connection strength is less than or greater than the corresponding reference connection strength. From the difference or from the size of the difference, a probability can be derived that a dividing line or at least a partial section of a dividing line is arranged in the respective group of measuring points. If the connection strength greatly exceeds the reference connection strength, for example above a certain threshold value, a higher probability of the existence of a separation line can be concluded within the measurement points of the respective group than, for example, if the reference connection strength is just exceeded.

Zum Bestimmen der Signalintensitäten wird mindestens ein Verlauf der Signalintensität des Messsignals als Funktion des Orts auf dem Wertdokument bestimmt, z.B. eine zweidimensionale Verteilung der Signalintensität. Die zweidimensionale Verteilung der Signalintensität kann über das gesamte Wertdokument oder auch über einen oder mehrere Teilbereiche des Wertdokuments bestimmt werden.For determining the signal intensities, at least one profile of the signal intensity of the measurement signal is determined as a function of the location on the value document, e.g. a two-dimensional distribution of the signal intensity. The two-dimensional distribution of the signal intensity can be determined over the entire value document or also over one or more subareas of the value document.

Die Verbindungsstärke der jeweiligen Gruppe von Messpunkten liefert eine quantitative Aussage darüber, inwiefern innerhalb der Gruppe, insbesondere entlang einer bestimmten Richtung auf dem Wertdokument durchgängig ein großer Gradientenwert existiert. Zur Ermittlung der Verbindungsstärke wird das Produkt der Gradientenwerte innerhalb der Gruppe oder auch deren Summe gebildet.The connection strength of the respective group of measuring points provides a quantitative statement as to how far a large gradient value exists throughout the group, in particular along a specific direction on the value document. To determine the connection strength, the product of the gradient values within the group or also their sum is formed.

In einer Weiterbildung des Verfahrens werden die Signalintensitäten auf Referenzintensitäten normiert, die vorzugsweise spezifisch für den jeweiligen Messpunkt sind. Dabei werden die Signalintensitäten beispielsweise an jedem der Messpunkte auf eine für den jeweiligen Messpunkt geltende Referenzintensität normiert. Die Referenzintensitäten können anhand einer Vielzahl echter Wertdokumente ermittelt werden oder im Vorfeld der Prüfung ermittelt worden sein. Die Referenzintensität eines Messpunkts kann durch einen Mittelwert der Signalintensitäten gegeben sein, die für den jeweiligen Messpunkt anhand der Vielzahl von Wertdokumenten bestimmt wurden.In a further development of the method, the signal intensities are normalized to reference intensities, which are preferably specific to the respective Are measuring point. In this case, the signal intensities are standardized, for example at each of the measuring points, to a reference intensity valid for the respective measuring point. The reference intensities can be determined on the basis of a large number of genuine value documents or determined in advance of the test. The reference intensity of a measuring point can be given by an average value of the signal intensities determined for the respective measuring point on the basis of the plurality of value documents.

Neben den Referenzintensitäten der Messpunkte kann auch die für eine Gruppe von Messpunkten geltende Referenz-Verbindungsstärke anhand einer Vielzahl echter Wertdokumente bestimmt werden oder im Vorfeld der Prüfung ermittelt worden sein. Die Referenz-Verbindungsstärke einer Gruppe kann durch einen Mittelwert von Verbindungsstärken gegeben sein, die für die jeweilige Gruppe von Messpunkten anhand der Vielzahl von Wertdokumenten bestimmt wurde.In addition to the reference intensities of the measuring points, the reference connecting strength valid for a group of measuring points can also be determined on the basis of a multiplicity of genuine value documents or determined in advance of the test. The reference connection strength of a group may be given by an average of connection strengths determined for the respective group of measurement points from the plurality of value documents.

Vorzugsweise werden die Referenzintensitäten und/oder die Referenz-Verbindungsstärken anhand von Wertdokumenten der Art des zu prüfenden Wertdokuments ermittelt, bei Banknoten beispielsweise anhand von Banknoten derselben Denomination. Für die verschiedenen Arten von Wertdokumenten können jeweils spezifische Referenzintensitäten und/oder spezifische Referenz-Verbindungsstärken hinterlegt sein. Die Referenzintensitäten und/oder die Referenz-Verbindungsstärken können anhand der Art des Wertdokuments, beispielsweise der Währung und Denomination einer Banknote, ausgewählt werden. Zur Auswahl der für das zu prüfende Wertdokument geltenden Referenzintensitäten und/oder der Referenz-Verbindungsstärken wird beispielsweise vor der Prüfung des Wertdokuments die Art des Wertdokuments identifiziert. Im Fall von Banknoten kann diese Identifizierung z.B. eine dem erfindungsgemäßen Verfahren vorausgehende Denominationsbestimmung sein.Preferably, the reference intensities and / or the reference connection strengths are determined on the basis of value documents of the type of the value document to be checked, in the case of banknotes, for example, on the basis of banknotes of the same denomination. Specific reference intensities and / or specific reference connection strengths can each be stored for the different types of value documents. The reference intensities and / or the reference connection strengths may be selected based on the type of value document, for example the currency and denomination of a banknote. In order to select the reference intensities and / or the reference connection strengths that apply to the value document to be checked, the type of value document is identified, for example, before the value document is checked. In the case of banknotes can this identification, for example, be a denomination determination preceding the method according to the invention.

Zur Bestimmung der Gradientenwerte wird in einer Ausführungsform für jeden der Messpunkte der ausgewählten Gruppe die erste Ableitung der Signalintensität entlang einer ersten Richtung auf dem Wertdokument gebildet. Der Gradientenwert der Signalintensität an dem jeweiligen Messpunkt kann zum Beispiel proportional zum Absolutbetrag der ersten Ableitung der Signalintensität an dem jeweiligen Messpunkt sein, wobei die erste Ableitung entlang der ersten Richtung auf dem Wertdokument gebildet wird.For determining the gradient values, in one embodiment, for each of the measurement points of the selected group, the first derivative of the signal intensity along a first direction is formed on the value document. For example, the gradient value of the signal intensity at the respective measurement point may be proportional to the absolute value of the first derivative of the signal intensity at the respective measurement point, the first derivative being formed along the first direction on the value document.

In einer weiteren Ausführungsform wird für jeden der Messpunkte der ausgewählten Gruppe zur Bestimmung des jeweiligen Gradientenwerts zumindest eine Differenz aus der Signalintensität an dem jeweiligen Messpunkt und der Signalintensität an zumindest einem benachbarten Messpunkt gebildet, wobei die benachbarten Messpunkte entlang einer ersten Richtung auf dem Wertdokument zu dem jeweiligen Messpunkt benachbart sind. Beispielsweise kann der Gradientenwert der Signalintensität an dem jeweiligen Messpunkt proportional zum Absolutbetrag der Differenz sein, die aus der Signalintensität an dem jeweiligen Messpunkt und der Signalintensität an zumindest einem benachbarten Messpunkt gebildet wird.In a further embodiment, at least one difference from the signal intensity at the respective measuring point and the signal intensity at at least one adjacent measuring point is formed for each of the measuring points of the selected group for determining the respective gradient value, wherein the adjacent measuring points along a first direction on the value document to the respective measuring point are adjacent. For example, the gradient value of the signal intensity at the respective measuring point may be proportional to the absolute value of the difference, which is formed from the signal intensity at the respective measuring point and the signal intensity at at least one adjacent measuring point.

Die erste Richtung verläuft vorzugsweise entlang einer Transportrichtung des Wertdokuments, insbesondere etwa parallel zu einer Längsrichtung des Wertdokuments oder etwa senkrecht zur Längsrichtung, d.h. etwa parallel zur kürzeren Seite des Wertdokuments. Das Wertdokument wird entlang der Transportrichtung an einem Sensor vorbeigeführt, mit dem die Signalintensitäten des Messsignals bestimmt werden.The first direction preferably runs along a transport direction of the value document, in particular approximately parallel to a longitudinal direction of the document of value or approximately perpendicular to the longitudinal direction, ie approximately parallel to the shorter side of the document of value. The value document is guided past a sensor along the transport direction, with which the signal intensities of the measurement signal are determined.

In einer speziellen Ausgestaltung sind die Messpunkte der Gruppe entlang einer zweiten Richtung auf dem Wertdokument angeordnet. Die zweite Richtung verläuft vorzugsweise in einem von Null verschiedenen Winkel zur ersten Richtung, beispielsweise vertikal zur ersten Richtung.In a special embodiment, the measuring points of the group are arranged along a second direction on the value document. The second direction preferably runs at a non-zero angle to the first direction, for example, vertically to the first direction.

Bei den erfindungsgemäßen Verfahren wird als Messsignal beispielsweise ein optisches Messsignal verwendet, das insbesondere im sichtbaren oder im nicht-sichtbaren Spektralbereich liegt. Das Messsignal kann ein Lumineszenzsignal sein, das von dem Wertdokument emittiert wird, beispielsweise ein durch UV-Licht angeregtes Lumineszenzsignal, insbesondere ein Fluoreszenzsignal.In the method according to the invention, for example, an optical measuring signal is used as the measuring signal, which is in particular in the visible or in the non-visible spectral range. The measurement signal may be a luminescence signal which is emitted by the value document, for example a luminescence signal excited by UV light, in particular a fluorescence signal.

In einer Weiterbildung des Verfahrens wird zusätzlich zumindest eine weitere Gruppe der Messpunkte ausgewählt, an denen die Signalintensität des Messsignals bestimmt wird. Das Auswählen der weiteren Gruppen kann beispielsweise direkt im Anschluss an das Auswählen der zuvor ausgewählten Gruppe erfolgen. Alternativ kann das Auswählen der weiteren Gruppen auch während oder nach Durchführung eines oder mehrerer der erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrensschritte, die auf das Auswählen der zuvor ausgewählten Gruppe folgen, so zum Beispiel nach dem Ermitteln der Verbindungsstärke für die zuvor ausgewählte Gruppe. Nach dem Auswählen einer weiteren Gruppe werden weitere Gradientenwerte der Signalintensitäten für die Messpunkte der jeweiligen weiteren Gruppe bestimmt. Zur Ermittlung einer weiteren Verbindungsstärke der jeweiligen weiteren Gruppe werden die weiteren Gradientenwerte miteinander verknüpft. Anschließend wird die weitere Verbindungsstärke ausgewertet. Zum Auswerten wird die weitere Verbindungsstärke beispielsweise mit einer weiteren Referenz-Verbindungsstärke verglichen, die für die Messpunkte der jeweiligen weiteren Gruppe, z.B. anhand echter Wertdokumente ermittelt wurde. Für die verschiedenen ausgewählten Gruppen können gleiche oder auch individuelle Referenz-Verbindungsstärken verwendet werden.In a development of the method, additionally at least one further group of the measuring points is selected, at which the signal intensity of the measuring signal is determined. For example, selecting the further groups may be done immediately after selecting the previously selected group. Alternatively, the selection of the further groups may also be made during or after performing one or more of the method steps of the invention following selection of the previously selected group, such as after determining the connection strength for the previously selected group. After selecting a further group, further gradient values of the signal intensities for the measuring points of the respective further group are determined. In order to determine a further connection strength of the respective further group, the further gradient values are linked to one another. Subsequently, the further connection strength is evaluated. For evaluation, the further connection strength is compared, for example, with a further reference connection strength, which was determined for the measurement points of the respective further group, eg on the basis of genuine value documents. For the different selected groups can use the same or individual reference connection strengths.

Überschreitet die Verbindungsstärke und/oder die weitere Verbindungsstärke die für die jeweilige Gruppe geltende Referenz-Verbindungsstärke, so besteht eine hohe Wahrscheinlichkeit dafür, dass innerhalb der Messpunkte dieser Gruppe zumindest ein Teilabschnitt einer Trennlinie verläuft. Das geprüfte Wertdokument kann dann mit Verdacht auf das Vorliegen einer composed-Fälschung aussortiert werden.If the connection strength and / or the further connection strength exceeds the reference connection strength valid for the respective group, then there is a high probability that within the measurement points of this group at least a partial section of a separation line runs. The tested value document can then be sorted out with suspicion of the existence of a composed forgery.

Die Auswahl, welche Messpunkte zu einer Gruppe zusammengefasst werden, orientiert sich beispielsweise daran, an welchen Stellen eines Wertdokuments die Trennlinien von composed-Fälschungen typischerweise platziert sind. In einer Weiterbildung des Verfahrens erfolgt die Auswahl der Gruppe daher in Abhängigkeit einer typischen Trennlinienposition auf dem Wertdokument, wobei die typische Trennlinienposition anhand mehrerer gefälschter Wertdokumente ermittelt wird. Zur Ermittlung einer typischen Trennlinienposition werden beispielsweise die Positionen der Trennlinien von mehreren bekannten composed-Fälschungen erfasst und statistisch ausgewertet. In Abhängigkeit davon können dann die Gruppen der Messpunkte für das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren ausgewählt werden. Die Auswahl der Gruppen erfolgt z.B. so, dass das gesamte Wertdokument oder auch ein Teilbereich des Wertdokuments auf das Vorliegen von Trennlinien geprüft wird.For example, the selection of which measurement points are grouped together is based on the positions of a value document in which the dividing lines of composed forgeries are typically placed. In a development of the method, the selection of the group therefore takes place as a function of a typical parting line position on the value document, the typical parting line position being determined on the basis of a plurality of forged value documents. To determine a typical parting line position, for example, the positions of the parting lines of several known composed counterfeits are detected and evaluated statistically. Depending on this, the groups of the measuring points can then be selected for the method according to the invention. The selection of groups is e.g. in such a way that the entire value document or a subarea of the value document is checked for the presence of parting lines.

Die Auswahl der weiteren Gruppen kann auch in Abhängigkeit der Verbindungsstärke der zuvor ausgewählten Gruppe oder mehrerer zuvor ausgewählter Gruppen erfolgen. Darüber hinaus kann die Auswahl der weiteren Gruppen auch in Abhängigkeit zumindest eines Unterschieds zwischen der Verbindungsstärke zumindest einer zuvor ausgewählten Gruppe und der Referenz-Verbindungsstärke der zumindest einen zuvor ausgewählten Gruppe erfolgen.The selection of the further groups can also be made depending on the connection strength of the previously selected group or of several previously selected groups. In addition, the selection of the further groups can also be dependent on at least one difference between the connection strength of at least one previously selected group and the Reference connection strength of at least one previously selected group.

Durch die weiteren Gruppen kann ein Teil des Bereichs und/oder eine unmittelbare Umgebung des Bereichs geprüft werden, der bereits durch die erste Gruppe geprüft wurde. Wenn sich zum Beispiel durch eine relativ große Verbindungsstärke einer ersten Gruppe von Messpunkten ein Hinweis auf eine mögliche Trennlinie ergibt - falls z.B. ein Teilabschnitt einer nichtgeradlinig verlaufenden Trennlinie erfasst wird - so könnten weitere Gruppen von Messpunkten in der unmittelbaren Umgebung der ersten Gruppe ausgewählt werden. Mit Hilfe der weiteren Gruppen können der verdächtige Bereich des Wertdokuments und/oder dessen unmittelbare Umgebung unter verschiedenen Winkeln geprüft werdenThe further groups can be used to check a part of the area and / or an immediate area of the area that has already been checked by the first group. If, for example, a relatively large connecting strength of a first group of measuring points indicates an indication of a possible dividing line - if e.g. a subsection of a non-rectilinear separation line is detected - so further groups of measurement points in the immediate vicinity of the first group could be selected. With the aid of the further groups, the suspect area of the value document and / or its immediate surroundings can be checked at different angles

Als weitere Gruppen zur Prüfung des verdächtigen Bereichs können auch Messpunkte ausgewählt werden, die nicht über das gesamte Wertdokument, sondern jeweils nur über einen Teilabschnitt des Wertdokuments angeordnet sind. Die weiteren Gruppen können eine Teilmenge einer oder mehrerer zuvor ausgewählter Gruppen enthalten oder eine Teilmenge von diesen sein. Mit Hilfe der weiteren Gruppen kann also auch ein Teilbereich eines zuvor geprüften Bereichs geprüft werden.As further groups for checking the suspicious area, it is also possible to select measuring points which are not arranged over the entire value document but only over a subsection of the value document. The further groups may contain or be a subset of one or more previously selected groups. With the help of the other groups, a subarea of a previously tested area can also be checked.

In einer speziellen Ausgestaltung sind die Messpunkte mehrerer ausgewählter Gruppen parallel zueinander auf dem Wertdokument angeordnet. Die Messpunkte der ausgewählten Gruppen können jedoch auch entlang verschiedener Richtungen auf dem Wertdokument angeordnet sein.In a specific embodiment, the measuring points of a plurality of selected groups are arranged parallel to one another on the value document. However, the measurement points of the selected groups may also be arranged along different directions on the value document.

Ein weiterer Aspekt der Erfindung betrifft die Vorrichtung, die zur Durchführung des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens verwendet wird. Diese Vorrichtung weist vorzugsweise einen Sensor zur Bestimmung der Signalintensitäten des Messsignals auf. Der Sensor kann ein Bildsensor zur Erfassung optischer Merkmale von Wertdokumenten, zum Beispiels von Banknoten sein und weist vorzugsweise zumindest eine Detektorzeile zur Bestimmung der Signalintensitäten des Messsignals auf.Another aspect of the invention relates to the device used to carry out the method according to the invention. This device preferably has a sensor for determining the signal intensities of the measurement signal. The sensor may be an image sensor for detecting optical features of value documents, for example banknotes, and preferably has at least one detector line for determining the signal intensities of the measurement signal.

Nachfolgend wird die Erfindung anhand der begleitenden Zeichnungen beispielhaft beschrieben.The invention will be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings.

Es zeigen:

Fig. 1a
Schematische Abbildung einer composed-Fälschung, die aus zwei Teilen zusammengesetzt ist,
Fig. 1b
Skizzierter Verlauf der Signalintensität sm der Messspur m und der Gradientenwerte gm der Messspur m,
Fig. 1c
Skizzierter Verlauf der Signalintensität sm+1 der Messspur m+1 und der Gradientenwerte gm+1 der Messspur m+1,
Fig. 2a
Zweidimensionale Anordnung der Messpunkte in Form eines Gitters auf der composed-Fälschung,
Fig. 2b
Drei Gruppen (a, b, c) von Messpunkten mit parallel zueinander angeordneten Messpunkten,
Fig. 2c
Tabelle mit beispielhaften Gradientenwerten der Gruppen a, b, c sowie daraus ermittelte Verbindungsstärken Va, Vb, Vc und zugehörige Referenz-Verbindungsstärken Ra, Rb, Rc, und
Fig. 3
Fünf Gruppen (a', b', c', d', e') von Messpunkten mit schräg zur Transportrichtung, entlang verschiedener Richtungen angeordneten Messpunkten.
Show it:
Fig. 1a
Schematic illustration of a composed counterfeit composed of two parts
Fig. 1b
Sketched course of the signal intensity s m of the measuring track m and the gradient values g m of the measuring track m,
Fig. 1c
Sketched course of the signal intensity s m + 1 of the measuring track m + 1 and of the gradient values g m + 1 of the measuring track m + 1,
Fig. 2a
Two-dimensional arrangement of the measurement points in the form of a grid on the composed counterfeit,
Fig. 2b
Three groups (a, b, c) of measuring points with measuring points arranged parallel to one another,
Fig. 2c
Table with exemplary gradient values of groups a, b, c and connection strengths V a , V b , V c determined therefrom and associated reference connection strengths R a , R b , R c , and
Fig. 3
Five groups (a ', b', c ', d', e ') of measuring points with measuring points obliquely to the transport direction, arranged along different directions.

In Figur 1a ist schematisch eine composed-Fälschung 1 abgebildet, die aus zwei Teilen zusammengesetzt ist, beispielsweise aus einer linken, echten Teilbanknote 1a und einer rechten, falschen Teilbanknote 1b. An einer etwa senkrecht durch die composed-Fälschung 1 laufenden Trennlinie 2 sind die beiden Teilbanknoten 1a und 1b zusammengeklebt. Auf der echten Teilbanknote 1a ist beispielhaft ein Sicherheitselement 3 gezeigt, das unter UV-Beleuchtung fluoresziert. Zur Prüfung auf Echtheit wird die composed-Fälschung 1 unter einer Detektorzeile 5 entlang der mit dem Pfeil 4 gekennzeichneten Transportrichtung x hindurchbewegt. Die Detektorzeile 5 ist Teil eines Sensors zur Prüfung von Wertdokumenten, der die Signalintensität der Fluoreszenz der zu prüfenden composed-Fälschung 1 als Funktion der Zeit bzw. als Funktion des Orts x auf der composed-Fälschung 1 erfasst. Die Detektorzeile 5 besitzt mehrere Messspuren, die senkrecht zur Transportrichtung (in y-Richtung) angeordnet sind, unter anderem die beiden Messspuren m und m+1, deren Signale im Folgenden beispielhaft betrachtet werden.In FIG. 1a schematically a composed forgery 1 is shown, which is composed of two parts, for example, a left, real part banknote 1a and a right, wrong partial banknote 1b. At an approximately perpendicular through the composed counterfeiting 1 ongoing dividing line 2, the two sub-bank notes 1a and 1b are glued together. On the real sub-bank note 1a, a security element 3 is shown by way of example, which fluoresces under UV illumination. To check for authenticity, the composed counterfeit 1 is moved under a detector line 5 along the transport direction x marked with the arrow 4. The detector row 5 is part of a sensor for checking value documents which detects the signal intensity of the fluorescence of the composed forgery 1 to be tested as a function of time or as a function of the location x on the composed counterfeit 1. The detector row 5 has a plurality of measuring tracks, which are arranged perpendicular to the transport direction (in the y-direction), inter alia the two measuring tracks m and m + 1, the signals of which are considered below by way of example.

Die Figuren 1b und 1c zeigen die Signalintensität sm der Messspur m und die Gradientenwerte gm der Messspur m sowie die Signalintensität sm+1 der Messspur m+1 und die Gradientenwerte gm+1 der Messspur m+1 als Funktion des Orts x auf der composed-Fälschung 1. Die Signalintensitäten sm und sm+1 weisen am Ort xT, dem Schnittpunkt der x-Achse mit der Trennlinie 2, einen deutlichen Sprung auf, der durch unterschiedliche Fluoreszenzeigenschaften der echten Teilbanknote 1a und der falschen Teilbanknote 1b zustande kommt. Darüber hinaus ist bei der Messspur m eine deutlich erhöhte Signalintensität im Bereich des fluoreszierenden Sicherheitselements 3 zu erkennen. Die Signalintensität sm+1 weist an den x-Koordinaten des Sicherheitselements 3 keine erhöhte Signalintensität auf, da die Messspur m+1 die Fluoreszenz des Sicherheitselements 3 nicht mehr erfasst. Die Gradientenwerte gm und gm+1 ergeben sich aus den Signalintensitäten sm bzw. sm+1 durch Berechnung des Absolutbetrags der ersten Ableitung der jeweiligen Signalintensität in Transportrichtung x.The Figures 1b and 1c show the signal intensity s m of the measuring track m and the gradient values g m of the measuring track m and the signal intensity s m + 1 of the measuring track m + 1 and the gradient values g m + 1 of the measuring track m + 1 as a function of the location x on the composed counterfeit 1. The signal intensities s m and s m + 1 have a clear jump at the location x T , the intersection of the x-axis with the dividing line 2, which results from different fluorescence properties of the real partial bank note 1 a and the incorrect partial bank note 1 b. In addition, in the measuring track m is a significantly increased Signal intensity in the area of the fluorescent security element 3 to recognize. The signal intensity s m + 1 has no increased signal intensity at the x-coordinates of the security element 3, since the measuring track m + 1 no longer detects the fluorescence of the security element 3. The gradient values g m and g m + 1 result from the signal intensities s m and s m + 1, respectively, by calculating the absolute value of the first derivative of the respective signal intensity in the transport direction x.

Darüber hinaus werden auch von den übrigen Messspuren der Detektorzeile 5 jeweils die Signalintensitäten s1, s2, ... und die zugehörigen Gradientenwerte g1, g2, ... bestimmt. Damit erhält man eine zweidimensionale Verteilung der Signalintensitäten und der Gradientenwerte über die gesamte composed-Fälschung 1. Am Ort xT weisen nicht nur die Gradientenwerte gm und gm+1 sondern auch die Gradientenwerte der übrigen Messspuren einen Peak auf, entsprechend einem Sprung der jeweiligen Signalintensität.In addition, each of the signal intensities also from the other measuring tracks of the detector line 5 s 1, s 2, ... and the corresponding gradient values g 1, g 2 determines .... This yields a two-dimensional distribution of the signal intensities and the gradient values over the entire composed counterfeiting 1. At the location x T , not only the gradient values g m and g m + 1 but also the gradient values of the remaining measurement tracks have a peak corresponding to a jump of the respective signal intensity.

Figur 2a verdeutlicht die zweidimensionale Anordnung der Messpunkte, die als Zellen eines Gitters in der x-y-Ebene dargestellt sind, und deren Lage in Bezug auf die composed-Fälschung 1. Jede Messspur der Detektorzeile 5 entspricht einer Zeile des Gitters. Im Anschluss an die Bestimmung der Gradientenwerte an jedem der Messpunkte werden mehrere Gruppen von Messpunkten gebildet. Die Messpunkte jeder Gruppe sind jeweils entlang einer bestimmten Richtung auf dem Wertdokument angeordnet. Figur 2b zeigt beispielhaft drei Gruppen a, b, c, deren Messpunkte entlang der y-Richtung und parallel zueinander angeordnet sind. Die Messpunkte der drei Gruppen a, b, c sind in diesem Beispiel so gewählt, dass an ihnen die Signalintensitäten im Bereich der Trennlinie 2 und in deren unmittelbarer Umgebung erfasst werden. FIG. 2a illustrates the two-dimensional arrangement of the measuring points, which are represented as cells of a grid in the xy-plane, and their position with respect to the composed counterfeiting 1. Each measuring line of the detector line 5 corresponds to one line of the grid. Following the determination of the gradient values at each of the measuring points, a plurality of groups of measuring points are formed. The measuring points of each group are each arranged along a specific direction on the value document. FIG. 2b shows by way of example three groups a, b, c whose measuring points are arranged along the y-direction and parallel to one another. In this example, the measuring points of the three groups a, b, c are chosen such that the signal intensities in the area of the dividing line 2 and in their immediate surroundings are detected on them.

In der Tabelle der Figur 2c sind in den Zeilen 1-12 beispielhaft Gradientenwerte der Messpunkte der drei Gruppen a, b, c aufgeführt. Aus den Gradientenwerten der einzelnen Gruppen a, b, c wird jeweils eine Verbindungsstärke Va, Vb, Vc durch Multiplizieren die Gradientenwerte innerhalb jeder Gruppe von Messpunkten bestimmt. Aus den Gradientenwerten der Gruppe b ergibt sich, im Vergleich zu den Gruppen a und c, eine sehr große Verbindungsstärke Vb. Zur Auswertung werden die Verbindungsstärken Va, Vb, Vc der einzelnen Gruppen anschließend mit den Referenz-Verbindungsstärken Ra, Rb, Rc verglichen, die für die jeweilige Gruppe gelten und die z.B. im Vorfeld der Prüfung anhand echter Wertdokumente ermittelt wurden. Die Verbindungsstärken Va und Vc sind deutlich kleiner als die jeweilige Referenz-Verbindungsstärke Ra bzw. Rc. Demgegenüber ist die Verbindungsstärke Vb deutlich größer ist als die zugehörige Referenz-Verbindungsstärke Rb. Aus der vergleichsweise großen Verbindungsstärke Vb lässt sich schließen, dass innerhalb der Messpunkte der Gruppe b mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit eine Trennlinie 2 verläuft. Das geprüfte Wertdokument kann somit mit Verdacht auf das Vorliegen einer composed-Fälschung 1 aussortiert werden.In the table of Figure 2c For example, in lines 1-12, gradient values of the measuring points of the three groups a, b, c are listed. From the gradient values of the individual groups a, b, c, in each case a connection strength V a , V b , V c is determined by multiplying the gradient values within each group of measuring points. From the gradient values of the group b, a very large connection strength Vb results compared to the groups a and c. For evaluation, the connection strengths V a, V b are then compared V c of the groups with the reference connection strengths Ra, Rb, Rc, which apply to the respective group and for example have been determined in advance of the examination based real value documents. The connection strengths V a and V c are significantly smaller than the respective reference connection strength Ra or Rc. In contrast, the connection strength Vb is significantly greater than the corresponding reference connection strength Rb. It can be concluded from the comparatively large connection strength Vb that within the measuring points of the group b a separation line 2 is likely to run. The tested value document can thus be sorted out with suspicion of the presence of a composed counterfeit 1.

In Figur 3 sind Beispiele für weitere Gruppen a'-e' von Messpunkten gezeigt. Die Messpunkte der Gruppen a'-c' sind sternförmig, hier von dem zweiten Messpunkt der ersten Zeile des Messpunktgitters aus, unter verschiedenen Winkeln über das Wertdokument 1 angeordnet. In gleicher Weise können mehrere, beliebig gewählte Messpunkte als Ausgangs-Messpunkt verwendet werden. Die Messpunkte der Gruppen d' und e' sind parallel zueinander angeordnet und verlaufen unter einem von Null verschiedenen Winkel zur Transportrichtung x über einen Teilabschnitt des Wertdokuments 1. Die am Rand des Wertdokuments 1 liegenden Messpunkte wurden bei den Gruppen d' und e' ausgenommen. Mit Hilfe dieser Gruppen können auch composed-Fälschungen erkannt werden, deren Trennlinien schräg über die composed-Fälschung verlaufen.In FIG. 3 Examples of further groups a'-e 'of measuring points are shown. The measuring points of the groups a'-c 'are arranged in a star shape, here from the second measuring point of the first line of the measuring point grid, at different angles over the document of value 1. In the same way, several, arbitrarily selected measuring points can be used as output measuring point. The measuring points of the groups d 'and e' are arranged parallel to one another and run at a non-zero angle to the transport direction x over a subsection of the value document 1. The measuring points lying at the edge of the value document 1 were excluded in the groups d 'and e'. With the help of these groups can also composed fakes be recognized, whose dividing lines run obliquely over the composed counterfeiting.

Für das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren können nicht nur Gruppen mit quer oder schräg zur Banknote angeordneten Messpunkten ausgewählt werden, sondern auch solche Gruppen, deren Messpunkte in Längsrichtung der Banknote angeordnet sind. Darüber hinaus können die Messpunkte einer Gruppe auch so angeordnet sein, dass diese nicht auf einer Linie liegen. Die Messpunkte einer Gruppe können stattdessen auch auf einer Kurve liegen und/oder die Anordnung der Messpunkte kann einen Versatz aufweisen, z.B. um composed-Fälschungen mit entsprechend verlaufenden Trennlinien zu erkennen.Not only groups with measuring points arranged transversely or obliquely to the banknote can be selected for the method according to the invention, but also those groups whose measuring points are arranged in the longitudinal direction of the banknote. In addition, the measurement points of a group can also be arranged so that they do not lie in a line. Instead, the measurement points of a group may also lie on a curve and / or the arrangement of the measurement points may have an offset, e.g. to detect composed counterfeits with corresponding dividing lines.

Claims (13)

  1. A method for checking value documents (1), in particular for recognizing forged value documents (1), having the steps of:
    - determining signal intensities (s) of a measuring signal at a plurality of measuring points on a value document (1),
    - selecting a group (a-c, a'-e') of the measuring points, the selection of the group being effected in dependence on a typical separating line position on the value document (1),
    - determining gradient values (g) of the signal intensities (s) for the measuring points of the group (a-c, a'-e'),
    - linking the gradient values (g) of the group (a-c, a'-e') for ascertaining a connection strength (Va-c, a'-e') of the group (a-c, a'-e'), the connection strength (Va-c, a'-e') of the group (a-c, a'-e') being ascertained by forming a product or a sum of the gradient values (g) of the group (a-c, a'-e'),
    - evaluating the connection strength (Va-c, a'-e'),
    wherein the value document (1) is checked for the presence of separating lines (2) at which the value document (1) is assembled.
  2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that for evaluating the connection strength (Va-c, a'-e') the connection strength (Va-c, a'-e') is compared to a reference connection strength (Ra-c, a'-e').
  3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that there is derived from a difference between the connection strength (Va-c, a'-e') and the reference connection strength (Ra-c, a'-e') a probability of at least a segment of a separating line (2) being disposed in the group (a-c, a'-e') of measuring points.
  4. The method according to one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that for determining the signal intensities (s) there is determined at least one curve of the signal intensity (s) as a function of the place (x, y) on the value document (1), in particular a two-dimensional distribution of the signal intensity.
  5. The method according to one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that for determining the gradient values (g) of the group (a-c, a'-e') at least a first derivative of the signal intensity (s) is formed along a first direction (x) on the value document (1), the gradient value (g) at least at one measuring point of the group (a-c, a'-e') being in particular proportional to the absolute value of the first derivative at the measuring point.
  6. The method according to one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that for determining the gradient values (g) of the group at least one difference of the signal intensity (s) at a measuring point of the group and of the signal intensity (s) at least at one neighboring measuring point is formed, the neighboring measuring point being neighboring to the measuring point along a first direction (x) on the value document (1), the gradient value (g) at least at one measuring point of the group being in particular proportional to the absolute value of the difference.
  7. The method according to either of claims 5 to 6, characterized in that the first direction (x) extends along a transport direction of the value document (1) which extends in particular approximately parallel to a longitudinal direction of the value document (1) or approximately perpendicular to the longitudinal direction.
  8. The method according to claim 7, characterized in that the measuring points of the group (a-c, a'-e') are disposed along a second direction on the value document (1), the second direction extending preferably at a non-zero angle to the first direction (x), in particular vertically to the first direction (x).
  9. The method according to one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that the measuring signal is an optical measuring signal, preferably a luminescence signal excited by UV light, in particular a fluorescence signal.
  10. The method according to one or more of the preceding claims, characterized by the further steps of:
    - selecting at least one further group (a-c, a'-e') of the measuring points,
    - determining further gradient values (g) of the signal intensities (s) for the measuring points of at least one of the further groups (a-c, a'-e'),
    - linking the further gradient values (g) of at least one of the further groups (a-c, a'-e') for ascertaining at least one further connection strength (Va-c, a'-e'),
    - evaluating at least one of the further connection strengths (Va-c, a'-e').
  11. The method according to claim 10, characterized in that the selection of at least one of the further groups (a-c, a'-e') is effected in dependence of the connection strength of the group according to claim 1 (a-c, a'-e') and/or in dependence of a difference between the connection strength (Va-c, a'-e') of the group (a-c, a'-e') according to claim 1 and the reference connection strength (Ra-c, a'-e') according to claim 2.
  12. The method according to one or more of claims 10 to 11, characterized in that through the group (a-c, a'-e') according to claim 1 an area of the value document (1) is checked and through at least one of the further groups (a-c, a'-e') a part of the area and/or immediate surroundings of the area are checked, the area and/or the immediate surroundings of the area being checked in particular at different angles.
  13. An apparatus for checking value documents (1) for the presence of separating lines (2) at which the value document (1) is assembled, wherein the apparatus preferably has at least one sensor for determining signal intensities (s) of a measuring signal at a plurality of measuring points on a value document (1) and the apparatus is adapted for carrying out the following steps of:
    - selecting a group (a-c, a'-e') of the measuring points, the selection of the group being effected in dependence on a typical separating line position on the value document (1),
    - determining gradient values (g) of the signal intensities (s) for the measuring points of the group (a-c, a'-e'),
    - linking the gradient values (g) of the group (a-c, a'-e') for ascertaining a connection strength (Va-c, a'-e') of the group (a-c, a'-e'), the connection strength (Va-c, a'-e') of the group (a-c, a'-e') being ascertained by forming a product or a sum of the gradient values (g) of the group (a-c, a'-e'),
    - evaluating the connection strength (Va-c, a'-e'), the value document (1) being checked for the presence of separating lines (2) at which the value document (1) is assembled.
EP08749044.7A 2007-04-23 2008-04-22 Method and device for testing value documents Active EP2143081B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102007019107A DE102007019107A1 (en) 2007-04-23 2007-04-23 Method and device for checking value documents
PCT/EP2008/003220 WO2008128755A1 (en) 2007-04-23 2008-04-22 Method and device for testing value documents

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2143081A1 EP2143081A1 (en) 2010-01-13
EP2143081B1 true EP2143081B1 (en) 2018-10-24

Family

ID=39587955

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08749044.7A Active EP2143081B1 (en) 2007-04-23 2008-04-22 Method and device for testing value documents

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US8837804B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2143081B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101689316B (en)
DE (1) DE102007019107A1 (en)
RU (1) RU2452030C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2008128755A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102047296B (en) * 2008-05-02 2015-11-25 德拉鲁国际有限公司 For determining the method and apparatus of authenticity
DE102008051758A1 (en) * 2008-10-15 2010-04-22 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Method and device for processing value documents
CA2761960A1 (en) * 2009-06-12 2010-12-16 Diebold, Incorporated Banking system that operates responsive to data read from data bearing records
DE102010021803A1 (en) * 2010-05-27 2011-12-01 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Apparatus for checking the authenticity of documents of value
DE102010046024A1 (en) * 2010-09-20 2012-03-22 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Sensor for checking value documents
WO2012099337A1 (en) * 2011-01-17 2012-07-26 대한민국(관리부서:행정안전부 국립과학수사연구원장) Method for detecting an invisible mark on a card
CN102324134A (en) 2011-09-19 2012-01-18 广州广电运通金融电子股份有限公司 Valuable document identification method and device
DE102011121877A1 (en) 2011-12-21 2013-06-27 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Method and device for determining classification parameters for the classification of banknotes
DE102013015200A1 (en) 2013-09-13 2015-03-19 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Method for checking a value document
DE102016000011A1 (en) * 2016-01-05 2017-07-06 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Completeness check of a value document
RU2616643C1 (en) * 2016-02-09 2017-04-18 Акционерное общество "Гознак" (АО "Гознак") Method for producing valuable document protected from partial forgery, and received document
CN109410420B (en) * 2018-10-12 2021-01-01 深圳怡化电脑股份有限公司 Image detection method and device and bill discriminator

Family Cites Families (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3564268A (en) * 1969-06-27 1971-02-16 Standard Change Makers Inc Document verifier using photovoltaic cell with light sensitive bars
GB1543706A (en) * 1975-05-13 1979-04-04 Glory Kogyo Kk Note discriminating apparatus
US4143279A (en) * 1976-04-30 1979-03-06 Gretag Aktiengesellschaft Method and apparatus for testing the print quality of printed texts, more particularly banknotes
US4041456A (en) * 1976-07-30 1977-08-09 Ott David M Method for verifying the denomination of currency
DE2824849C2 (en) * 1978-06-06 1982-12-16 GAO Gesellschaft für Automation und Organisation mbH, 8000 München Method and device for determining the condition and / or the authenticity of sheet material
US4464789A (en) * 1980-05-19 1984-08-07 Environmental Research Institute Of Michigan Image analyzer for processing multiple frames of image data
US4464786A (en) * 1981-06-17 1984-08-07 Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha System for identifying currency note
US4547899A (en) * 1982-09-30 1985-10-15 Ncr Corporation Waveform matching system and method
JPS61177592A (en) * 1985-02-01 1986-08-09 アイエム電子株式会社 Type discriminator for printed matter
US4906988A (en) * 1987-01-27 1990-03-06 Rand Mcnally & Co. Object verification system and method
JPH01295391A (en) * 1987-06-24 1989-11-29 I M Denshi Kk Identifying device for printed matter
US5026974A (en) * 1989-12-27 1991-06-25 Ncr Corporation Method for recognizing the leading edge of a character in E13B font
US5652802A (en) * 1990-02-05 1997-07-29 Cummins-Allison Corp. Method and apparatus for document identification
EP0649114B1 (en) * 1993-10-14 2002-02-13 Omron Corporation Image processing device and method for identifying an input image and copier including same
US8144368B2 (en) * 1998-01-20 2012-03-27 Digimarc Coporation Automated methods for distinguishing copies from original printed objects
US6628816B2 (en) * 1994-08-09 2003-09-30 Cummins-Allison Corp. Method and apparatus for discriminating and counting documents
US5533144A (en) * 1994-10-17 1996-07-02 Xerox Corporation Anti-counterfeit pattern detector and method
US6661910B2 (en) * 1997-04-14 2003-12-09 Cummins-Allison Corp. Network for transporting and processing images in real time
IT1292830B1 (en) * 1997-03-28 1999-02-11 Gd Spa METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE CONTROL OF VALUABLE OR SECURITY OBJECTS IN PARTICULAR BANKNOTES.
US6181813B1 (en) * 1997-09-29 2001-01-30 Xerox Corporation Method for counterfeit currency detection using orthogonal line comparison
EP0947964A1 (en) 1998-03-30 1999-10-06 Ascom Autelca Ag Method for testing valuable papers
IT1309271B1 (en) * 1999-05-27 2002-01-16 Gd Spa BANKNOTE CHECK METHOD
US6516078B1 (en) * 1999-07-29 2003-02-04 Hewlett-Packard Company Multi-level detection and deterrence of counterfeiting of documents with reduced false detection
US8083136B1 (en) * 1999-11-30 2011-12-27 Diebold, Incorporated Banking system controlled responsive to data bearing records
US6473165B1 (en) * 2000-01-21 2002-10-29 Flex Products, Inc. Automated verification systems and methods for use with optical interference devices
RU2173886C1 (en) * 2000-02-23 2001-09-20 Общество с ограниченной ответственностью Фирма "Дата-Центр" Method and device for detecting two clinging bank notes
US7057723B2 (en) * 2000-12-21 2006-06-06 De La Rue International Limited Optical sensor device and method for spectral analysis
DE10113268B4 (en) * 2001-03-16 2021-06-24 Bundesdruckerei Gmbh Sensor for the authentication of security features on value and / or security documents
DE10132589B4 (en) * 2001-07-05 2005-11-03 Koenig & Bauer Ag Method for qualitative assessment of material
DE10146912A1 (en) * 2001-09-24 2003-04-10 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Procedure for individualizing security documents and corresponding security document
ATE354834T1 (en) * 2002-03-15 2007-03-15 Computer Sciences Corp METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ANALYZING WRITING IN DOCUMENTS
US6970236B1 (en) * 2002-08-19 2005-11-29 Jds Uniphase Corporation Methods and systems for verification of interference devices
JP4366104B2 (en) * 2003-04-17 2009-11-18 日立オムロンターミナルソリューションズ株式会社 Paper sheet discrimination device
JP4387176B2 (en) * 2003-12-12 2009-12-16 日立オムロンターミナルソリューションズ株式会社 Banknote discrimination
DE202005021081U1 (en) * 2005-12-14 2007-02-15 Wincor Nixdorf International Gmbh Valuable medium e.g. bank note, authenticity examining device, has sensor, which is movably arranged opposite to conveying mechanism that conveys medium to examination surface of sensor
EP1808823A1 (en) * 2005-12-14 2007-07-18 Wincor Nixdorf International GmbH Apparatus for assessing the authenticity of a valuable medium

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2008128755A1 (en) 2008-10-30
RU2452030C2 (en) 2012-05-27
CN101689316B (en) 2013-12-11
CN101689316A (en) 2010-03-31
RU2009142938A (en) 2011-07-10
EP2143081A1 (en) 2010-01-13
DE102007019107A1 (en) 2008-10-30
US20100128934A1 (en) 2010-05-27
US8837804B2 (en) 2014-09-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2143081B1 (en) Method and device for testing value documents
EP0978107B1 (en) Security element structure for documents, devices for checking documents with such security elements, method for the use thereof
EP1810251B1 (en) Method and device for processing banknotes
EP2771868B1 (en) Method and device for examining a sheet-shaped or card-shaped valuable document having a security feature having one or more cavities
WO2011147575A1 (en) Device for testing the authenticity of valuable documents
DE2824849A1 (en) METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING THE CONDITION AND / OR THE GENUINEITY OF FLAT OBJECTS
EP2132719B1 (en) Method for verifying value documents
EP2795589B1 (en) Method and device for examining a security feature of a value document
EP2795591B1 (en) Method and device for examining a document of value
EP1897067B1 (en) Method and device for recognising a coin by using the embossed pattern thereof
EP3108461B1 (en) Method for examining a value document, and means for carrying out the method
EP2795590B1 (en) Method and device for examining a document of value
EP2997553B1 (en) Device and method for examining value documents, in particular banknotes, and value document processing system
EP3050032B1 (en) Method of testing valubale documents of polymer material which has a transparent window and means to perform the method
EP4070294B1 (en) Device and method for processing value documents, more particularly bank notes, and value document processing system
EP2920769B1 (en) Apparatus and method to evaluate valuable documents
EP3134878B1 (en) Method of checking a value document
EP1567991B1 (en) Method and device for verifying valuable documents
EP3563357A1 (en) Method and device for detecting a security thread in a value document
EP2138322B1 (en) Valuable or security document with a safety marker
WO2024012634A1 (en) Sensor and method for checking valuable documents having at least one reflective security element
DE102015003480A1 (en) Apparatus and method for checking value documents, in particular banknotes, as well as value document processing system
EP4256538A1 (en) Sensor and method for verifying value documents
DE102020007321A1 (en) Method for detecting at least one mottled fiber of a banknote, and banknote processing device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20091123

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20110927

APBK Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNE

APBN Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2E

APBR Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3E

APAF Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNE

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT CURRENCY TECHNOLOGY GMBH

APBT Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9E

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20180522

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1057596

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20181115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502008016408

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE SCHAAD, BALASS, MENZL AND PARTN, CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20181024

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190124

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190124

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190224

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190224

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190125

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502008016408

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20190725

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20190430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190422

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R084

Ref document number: 502008016408

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190422

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20200423

Year of fee payment: 13

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181024

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20080422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210430

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210430

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20220425

Year of fee payment: 15

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20220420

Year of fee payment: 15

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230520

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20230422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230422

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230430

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240430

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20240417

Year of fee payment: 17