EP1294159A2 - Method for assigning network addresses - Google Patents
Method for assigning network addresses Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1294159A2 EP1294159A2 EP02078827A EP02078827A EP1294159A2 EP 1294159 A2 EP1294159 A2 EP 1294159A2 EP 02078827 A EP02078827 A EP 02078827A EP 02078827 A EP02078827 A EP 02078827A EP 1294159 A2 EP1294159 A2 EP 1294159A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- address
- addresses
- node
- unique
- serial number
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L61/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for addressing or naming
- H04L61/50—Address allocation
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L61/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for addressing or naming
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a unique scheme for IP address assignment in a telecommunication network, which transfers data and voice via proprietary packets. These network nodes need management control and administration in order to transmit communication traffic. This addressing provides the base for IP communication between nodes of the communications network and for connection to various external networks.
- An IF (Internet Protocol) Address is an identifier for a computer or device on a TCP/IP network. Networks using the TCP/IP protocol route messages based on the IP address of the destination.
- the format of an IP address is a 32-bit numeric address written as four numbers separated by periods. Each number can be zero to 255. For example, 1,160.10.240 could be an IP address.
- IP addresses IP addresses
- the InterNIC Registration Service (which was created in 1993 by the National Science Foundation - an independent agency of the U.S. government to provide registration services to Global Internet) assigns Internet addresses from the following three classes:
- IP addressing system There are several desired criteria of an IP addressing system:
- the simplest way to assign an IP address is to add one manually to every node during manufacturing or configuration. It is possible to receive such an address from InterNIC Registration Service or to choose randomly in the case of an isolated network.
- the main disadvantage of this method is the fact that an assigned IP address cannot be changed automatically, and in many cases cannot be changed at all. Thus, this conventional protocol doesn't fulfill criteria 1 and 3 above.
- IP assignment is a more complicated and powerful method to obtain an IP address.
- a computer or device without an IP address requests a local or remote server, with unique identification (usually Hardware MAC Address is used), and receives IP addresses back, following the short list of the major IP Assignment protocols and schemes, which were released in the past 20 years.
- RARP Reverse Address Resolution Protocol
- TCP/IP uses RARP to initialize the use of Internet addressing on an Ethernet or other network that uses its own media access control (MAC).
- MAC media access control
- This protocol uses a remote server with a database of the IP Addresses, and communicates with it by using a hardware network layer (Layer II).
- Layer II hardware network layer
- RFC 951 describes an IP/UDP bootstrap protocol (BOOTP), which allows a diskless client machine to discover its own IP address, the address of a server host, and the name of a file to be loaded into memory and executed.
- the bootstrap operation can be thought of as consisting of two phases. This RFC describes the first phase, which could be labeled 'address determination and bootfile selection'. After this address and filename information is obtained, control passes to the second phase of the bootstrap, where a file transfer occurs.
- This protocol uses a remote server with a database of IP Addresses, and communicates with it by using a UDP network layer (Layer III). This BOOTP protocol does not fulfill the criteria of 3 and 4 above.
- DHCP Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
- BOOTP Bootstrap Protocol
- DHCP captures the behavior of BOOTP relay agents, and DHCP participants can interoperate with BOOTP participants.
- This protocol uses a remote server with a database of IP Addresses, and communicates with it by using UDP network layer (Layer III). This DHCP protocol does not fulfill the criteria of 3 and 4 above.
- DHCP (and also RARP and BOOTP) was a security problem.
- the connection between client and server is unsecured; therefore it is easy to provide a problematic IP address to a DHCP client node.
- RFC drafts which describe an improved secure version of the DHCP.
- this secure DHCP doesn't fulfill the criterion of 4 above.
- the second drawback of the DHCP scheme is reliability. Once a DHCP Server is down, the DHCP client can't receive the requested IP address. Therefore, IETF is working at present to extend the CLIENT-SERVER model of the DHCP, into a CLIENT-MULTISERVER model, which requires a SERVER-SERVER extension protocol. There are several drafts, which describe such a model. However, this Server - to -- Server DHCP does not fulfill the criterion of 4 above.
- IPCP IP Control Protocol
- LCP Link Control Protocol
- Layer II PPP network layer
- IP addressing schemes that are used today to assign IP addresses have different approaches and implementations, but do not fulfill the IP addressing criteria set forth above. Accordingly, there is a long felt need for an IP addressing scheme which will fulfill all the criteria listed above.
- the present invention provides an IP address assignment method including generating an array of unique IP addresses composed using a chassis serial number assigned to a node during manufacture. Every node receives an array of unique IP addresses assigned to its components. All addresses are unique to each other. This is done without preventing the option to configure the IP addresses manually, if user wishes to do so, in a different addressing space.
- the method includes generation of a chassis serial number during manufacturing, composing a main node IP address during power-up of the node, based on the chassis serial number; and composing a plurality of associated interface addresses based on the node IP address.
- the method further includes composing special pools for DHCP and IPCP.
- a computer program product for generating an array of unique IP addresses composed using a chassis serial number assigned to a node during manufacture.
- the present invention relates to an IP address asssignment method and system.
- the proposed method allows assignment of local, unique IP addresses to all network nodes, and to every port of these nodes, including address "pools" for DHCP addresses for connecting networks and IPCP addresses for dial-up connections to the node. It also allows securing the addresses from the "Global Internet” space and avoiding modern hacker attacks, like "SYNC death” or "PING overflow". It also permits merging of two or more previously assigned rings or networks which use the same address system.
- the assignment process according to the invention is divided into 4 parts:
- node refers to a single PacketLight box
- Every node is given a unique serial number.
- the unique serial number is preferably burned into the Serial EPROM (SEEP) (non-volatile memory chip) on the chassis, which is configured during the manufacturing process and which stores the unique number. (The data is reserved during BOOT and RESET processes.) This will permit the generation of the unique IP addresses.
- SEEP Serial EPROM
- IP addresses have to be unique due to several requirements:
- every node will have a unique IP address (and unique address pool), which will be defined during manufacturing.
- the node IP Address is composed during power up of the node from the Chassis serial number and a Class A private network subnet, which is defined in RFC 1597.
- a subnet includes a collection of nodes, which communicate directly with each other. A group of smaller subnets form a larger network. Some of the network nodes communicate with other nodes via GATEWAY node. Such assignment will allow the addressing system to be secure from Public Internet, on the one hand, and to maintain uniqueness of every node, on the other hand.
- Node IP address 10 has 32 bits (4 bytes), which can be divided as follows:
- every node has 64 unique IP Addresses.
- the first address from 64 preferably goes to the node's main IP address.
- Another 4 go to IPCP and DHCP pools. (Addresses from the pool will be used by external equipment connected to the node, using dial-up and customer's LAN respectively.)
- the other 59 addresses are used for interface connections to other nodes, and will be available for different trunk Slots.
- an interface is the smallest communication object, connected with another interface.
- every port on the trunk card is an interface.
- the IP addresses of all interfaces are composed from the node's main IP Address, the slot number of the card in the node, and the number of the port on the card.
- Fig. 2 shows a schematic illustration of one embodiment of a port IP Address Distribution according to the present invention. This example describes address assignment for a node 20, according to one embodiment of the present invention. It will be appreciated that many other possible address distribution arrangements are possible according to the invention.
- the IP address "a.b.x.y" here is:
- the main controller card CPU reads the chassis serial number from the BackPlane SEEP of the node (here 000001) and creates the main controller 22 IP address and Backup Switch 24 addresses 10.0.1.1, where 10 .0.1.1 is a Class A private number, 10.0. 1 .1 is serial number of specific node, and 10.0.1. 1 is a Slot (Switch card) number. This number is assigned from the node's chassis serial number.
- RS232 26 and Ethernet port 28 pools will be assigned.
- the numbers for RS232 pool 26 in the illustrated embodiment are 10.0.1. 2 and 10.0.1. 3 , where the first address will be used as the PPP SERVER address, and the second as the PPP Client address and will be assigned to MANAGEMENT during IPCP negotiation.
- the numbers for Ethernet port pool 28 in the illustrated embodiment are 10.0.1. 4 and 10.0.1. 5 , where the first address will be used as the DHCP SERVER address, and the second as the DHCP Client address and will be assigned to MANAGEMENT during DHCP negotiation, in case of direct Ethernet connection.
- IP addresses will be assigned to every trunk -- 1 address to each trunk, and 2 addresses for every dual trunk. In this example addresses 10.0.1. 6 and 10.0.1. 7 will be distributed to the first trunk 30 and second trunk 32 respectively. These addresses are distributed by the MCC card, and depend on the trunk slot number.
- IPCP and DHCP IP address pools are composed.
- IPCP IP Addresses
- every node has ability to be controlled by a standalone PC or laptop.
- the common, simple and in many cases mandatory way today to communicate between them, is to supply IP address to such Laptop or standalone PC using DHCP protocol. Therefore, a pool of IP addresses must also be reserved for this Ethernet direct connection.
- these pools, and the assignment method of the present invention permit connection of nodes of the subnet of the invention not only with each other, but also with various standard external devices (like PC with modems and Internet Software, laptops and standalone computers, etc), without the need to reconfigure them previously.
- the system of assigning IP addresses of the present invention has a number of advantages over conventional systems.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
- Small-Scale Networks (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- Class A -
First octet 1→127 - supports 16,777,214 hosts on each of 126 networks - Class B - First octet 128→191 - supports 65,384 hosts on each of 16,384 networks
- Class C - First octet 192→223 supports 254 hosts on each of 2 million networks
- The same IP addresses are not allowed in a single network. Since these addresses are internal (according to RFC 1957 reserved private addresses), they can also be used by other organizations in other networks.
- During merger of several networks, it is important to provide uniqueness before and after the merge.
- 8 bit (reference 12) to a Class A Network Number
- 18 bit (reference 14) to the node's serial number. That will allow us to support up to 256k nodes with different IP addresses.
- 6 bit (reference 16) to interface address.
- a ― 8 bit
- b ― 8 bit
- x ― 10 bit
- y ― 6 bit
- Production simplicity: Automatic (as opposed to manual) scheme, based on a "seed" of raw data inside node. In order to use popular management and signaling protocols (like OSPF, MPLS, BGP etc), every interface must be assigned a unique IP address. Today's Telecom practice is to configure these IP addresses manually. Using our technique, a customer doesn't have to configure internal cards by himself. Moreover, the customer doesn't even know its internal IP addresses, but receives the network ready for management traffic flow. This technique will significantly reduce or prevent merger problems, human errors, and security problems.
- Allocation: Unique addresses are allocated not only to the management entity, but also to the trunk cards and internal serial and Ethernet pools. This is a new concept that defines each "communication entity" as a connection with its own address, and which solves the traditional "expansion problem", which is a common problem in almost every assignment technique. Every card, service or port in Telecom equipment has to be ready for expansion. In the system of the present invention, for example, at present, 1 IP Address is assigned for 1 port. But in the near future, four IP addresses could be assigned for every port. Therefore, 59 addresses are reserved for the node interfaces, even if today's requirement is only 14 addresses.
- Distribution: IP addresses are distributed to the MANAGEMENT instead of the MANAGEMENT distributing to the system. Because of the unique addresses, any ring or net operating with the same addressing system can be interconnected with no need to manually change anything or any probability for address congestion. This addressing system is particularly useful in co-pending US patent application number 09/753,400, assigned to the same Assignee, for a system of transporting packets between nodes in a telecommunications network.
Claims (7)
- An IP address assignment method comprising:
assigning a chassis serial number to a node during manufacture;
generating an array of unique IP addresses composed using said chassis serial number, and
assigning a unique IP address from said array to each interface associated with said node. - The method according to claim 1, including
generating a chassis serial number during manufacturing;
composing a node main IP address based on said chassis serial number, during power-up of the node, and
composing a plurality of associated interface addresses, based on said node IP address - The method according to either claim 1 or claim 2, wherein said step of generating an array includes generating an array of 64 unique IP addresses, each including 32 bits.
- The method according to any of the preceding claims, further comprising reserving a special pool of DHCP IP addresses to be distributed in a LAN network for connection to said node.
- The method according to any of the preceding claims, further comprising reserving a special pool of IDCP IP addresses to be distributed to dial-up users for connection to said node.
- The method according to claim 2, wherein the IP addresses of each interface are composed from said node main IP address, a slot number of a card in said node associated with said interface, and a number of a port of the card associated with the interface.
- A computer program product for IP address assignment comprising:
means for generating an array of unique IP addresses composed using a chassis serial number assigned to a node during manufacture; and
means for assigning a unique IP address from said array to each interface associated with said node.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US952092 | 2001-09-13 | ||
US09/952,092 US7254625B2 (en) | 2001-09-13 | 2001-09-13 | Method for assigning network addresses |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1294159A2 true EP1294159A2 (en) | 2003-03-19 |
EP1294159A3 EP1294159A3 (en) | 2003-08-27 |
Family
ID=25492577
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02078827A Withdrawn EP1294159A3 (en) | 2001-09-13 | 2002-09-13 | Method for assigning network addresses |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7254625B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1294159A3 (en) |
IL (1) | IL151778A0 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2493147A1 (en) * | 2011-02-23 | 2012-08-29 | Zerogroup Holding OÜ | Control system and pairing method for a control system |
CN109842623A (en) * | 2019-01-30 | 2019-06-04 | 常州玖玖盾数据科技有限公司 | Big data distribution method for industry control safety database auditing system |
Families Citing this family (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7464403B2 (en) * | 2002-07-23 | 2008-12-09 | Hardman Jr Thomas James | Secure mobile office wireless local-area network application integration package running from CD-ROM |
US7469418B1 (en) | 2002-10-01 | 2008-12-23 | Mirage Networks, Inc. | Deterring network incursion |
US8819285B1 (en) | 2002-10-01 | 2014-08-26 | Trustwave Holdings, Inc. | System and method for managing network communications |
US8260961B1 (en) | 2002-10-01 | 2012-09-04 | Trustwave Holdings, Inc. | Logical / physical address state lifecycle management |
US7493424B1 (en) | 2004-04-30 | 2009-02-17 | Netapp, Inc. | Network storage system with shared software stack for LDMA and RDMA |
US7962562B1 (en) | 2004-04-30 | 2011-06-14 | Netapp, Inc. | Multicasting message in a network storage system to local NVRAM and remote cluster partner |
US7895286B1 (en) | 2004-04-30 | 2011-02-22 | Netapp, Inc. | Network storage system with NVRAM and cluster interconnect adapter implemented in a single circuit module |
US7769913B1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2010-08-03 | Netapp, Inc. | Method and apparatus for assigning a local identifier to a cluster interconnect port in a network storage system |
US8301739B1 (en) * | 2004-12-23 | 2012-10-30 | Emc Corporation | Storage system initialization utility |
US7526536B2 (en) * | 2005-04-12 | 2009-04-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for port assignment management across multiple nodes in a network environment |
US20070250518A1 (en) * | 2006-04-19 | 2007-10-25 | Chu Simon C | Method and system for correlating location information of a server |
US10049534B2 (en) * | 2010-01-08 | 2018-08-14 | Apg Cash Drawer | Cash drawer having a network interface |
US9129493B2 (en) | 2010-01-08 | 2015-09-08 | Apg Cash Drawer, Llc | Wireless device operable cash drawer having biometric, database, and messaging capabilities |
US8928456B2 (en) | 2010-01-08 | 2015-01-06 | Apg Cash Drawer, Llc | Wireless device operable cash drawer |
US10091159B2 (en) * | 2015-10-05 | 2018-10-02 | Lenovo Enterprise Solutions (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Assigning network addresses to possible network ports to fullest extent to which addresses can be assigned to ports |
US11283685B1 (en) * | 2017-09-11 | 2022-03-22 | LumaForge Inc. | Shared storage systems and methods for collaborative workflows |
DE102017125649A1 (en) | 2017-11-02 | 2019-06-19 | Prisma Analytics Gmbh | Method for data communication using random network addresses and a corresponding device |
US11218360B2 (en) * | 2019-12-09 | 2022-01-04 | Quest Automated Services, LLC | Automation system with edge computing |
CN113114793B (en) * | 2021-03-22 | 2022-05-17 | 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 | Slave node address competition method and device and electrical appliance system |
Family Cites Families (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2662881B1 (en) * | 1990-05-30 | 1994-06-03 | Cit Alcatel | METHOD FOR ROUTING A CALL TO A SUBSCRIBER TO A WIRELESS TELEPHONY SERVICE. |
US5522042A (en) * | 1994-01-28 | 1996-05-28 | Cabletron Systems, Inc. | Distributed chassis agent for distributed network management |
GB9408574D0 (en) * | 1994-04-29 | 1994-06-22 | Newbridge Networks Corp | Atm switching system |
ES2100803B1 (en) * | 1994-05-20 | 1998-04-16 | Telefonica Nacional Espana Co | INTEGRATED DOUBLE EXPLORATION AND OPERATION CIRCUIT. |
JP2713226B2 (en) * | 1995-05-15 | 1998-02-16 | 日本電気株式会社 | Automatic IP address generation method in network |
GB9605853D0 (en) * | 1996-03-20 | 1996-05-22 | Univ Strathclyde | Array indexing |
IL119062A0 (en) * | 1996-08-13 | 1996-11-14 | Madge Networks Israel Ltd | Apparatus and method for detecting a layout of a switched local network |
US6114970A (en) * | 1997-01-09 | 2000-09-05 | Motorola, Inc. | Method of assigning a device identification |
US6289377B1 (en) * | 1997-11-10 | 2001-09-11 | General Instrument Corporation | Dynamic network configuration of a one-way adapter using a proxy agent that communicates with a resource server through a configured return path adapter |
US6101499A (en) * | 1998-04-08 | 2000-08-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and computer program product for automatically generating an internet protocol (IP) address |
US6229804B1 (en) * | 1998-11-17 | 2001-05-08 | 3Com Corporation | Gatekeeper election methods for internet telephony |
US6501746B1 (en) * | 1999-01-08 | 2002-12-31 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Mobile IP dynamic home address resolution |
JP3823585B2 (en) * | 1999-02-22 | 2006-09-20 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Device network connection method and router device |
US6581108B1 (en) * | 1999-11-30 | 2003-06-17 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Managing multiple private data networks using network and payload address translation |
US6880086B2 (en) * | 2000-05-20 | 2005-04-12 | Ciena Corporation | Signatures for facilitating hot upgrades of modular software components |
-
2001
- 2001-09-13 US US09/952,092 patent/US7254625B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2002
- 2002-09-13 EP EP02078827A patent/EP1294159A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2002-09-17 IL IL15177802A patent/IL151778A0/en unknown
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2493147A1 (en) * | 2011-02-23 | 2012-08-29 | Zerogroup Holding OÜ | Control system and pairing method for a control system |
WO2012113848A1 (en) * | 2011-02-23 | 2012-08-30 | Zerogroup Holding Oü | Control system and pairing method for a control system |
CN109842623A (en) * | 2019-01-30 | 2019-06-04 | 常州玖玖盾数据科技有限公司 | Big data distribution method for industry control safety database auditing system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7254625B2 (en) | 2007-08-07 |
US20030051014A1 (en) | 2003-03-13 |
EP1294159A3 (en) | 2003-08-27 |
IL151778A0 (en) | 2003-04-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7254625B2 (en) | Method for assigning network addresses | |
US6240464B1 (en) | Method and system for managing addresses for network host interfaces in a data-over-cable system | |
US6657991B1 (en) | Method and system for provisioning network addresses in a data-over-cable system | |
US7640287B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for auto-configuring layer three intermediate computer network devices | |
US7046666B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for communicating between divergent networks using media access control communications | |
US8804705B2 (en) | System and method for configuring an IP telephony device | |
US8260887B2 (en) | Method for automatic configuration of an access router compatible with the DHCP protocol, for specific automatic processing of IP flows from a client terminal | |
US20020165972A1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for use in reducing traffic over a communication link used by a computer network | |
US8681695B1 (en) | Single address prefix allocation within computer networks | |
US7068647B2 (en) | System and method for routing IP packets | |
US8028035B2 (en) | Shared resource support for internet protocols | |
US20060274749A1 (en) | Method enabling network address translation of incoming session initiation protocol connections base on dynamic host configuration protocol address assignments | |
US20020150083A1 (en) | System and method for performing IP telephony including internal and external call sessions | |
US6996621B1 (en) | Method for supporting secondary address delivery on remote access servers | |
US20020141390A1 (en) | System and method for performing IP telephony | |
US20030172170A1 (en) | Providing multiple ISP access to devices behind NAT | |
JP2003273935A (en) | Network connection apparatus and method for providing direct connection between network devices existing in different private networks | |
WO2012013133A1 (en) | Method and device for network communications | |
CN107241454B (en) | A kind of method, apparatus that realizing address administration, aaa server and SDN controller | |
KR100587560B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for communicating with external system in system having link local address | |
CN100581176C (en) | Method for exchanging user data packets | |
US20040199644A1 (en) | Method of assigning a virtual network identifier to a terminal, and a terminal, a dynamic host configuration server, and a directory server for implementing the method | |
US7085836B1 (en) | System and method for automatic private IP address selection | |
JP2003167805A (en) | Network communication method and server device between multiple user side closed network and server side closed network | |
McAuley et al. | Experience-with autoconfiguring a network with IP addresses |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20040324 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20040421 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20040902 |