EP0919971B1 - Système et procédé antivol pour détecter et identifier automatiquement une étiquette de surveillance d'articles - Google Patents
Système et procédé antivol pour détecter et identifier automatiquement une étiquette de surveillance d'articles Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0919971B1 EP0919971B1 EP98118521A EP98118521A EP0919971B1 EP 0919971 B1 EP0919971 B1 EP 0919971B1 EP 98118521 A EP98118521 A EP 98118521A EP 98118521 A EP98118521 A EP 98118521A EP 0919971 B1 EP0919971 B1 EP 0919971B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- base station
- transponder
- signal
- stage
- alarm
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/22—Electrical actuation
- G08B13/24—Electrical actuation by interference with electromagnetic field distribution
- G08B13/2402—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting
- G08B13/2465—Aspects related to the EAS system, e.g. system components other than tags
- G08B13/2482—EAS methods, e.g. description of flow chart of the detection procedure
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06K—GRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
- G06K19/00—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings
- G06K19/06—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings characterised by the kind of the digital marking, e.g. shape, nature, code
- G06K19/067—Record carriers with conductive marks, printed circuits or semiconductor circuit elements, e.g. credit or identity cards also with resonating or responding marks without active components
- G06K19/07—Record carriers with conductive marks, printed circuits or semiconductor circuit elements, e.g. credit or identity cards also with resonating or responding marks without active components with integrated circuit chips
- G06K19/0723—Record carriers with conductive marks, printed circuits or semiconductor circuit elements, e.g. credit or identity cards also with resonating or responding marks without active components with integrated circuit chips the record carrier comprising an arrangement for non-contact communication, e.g. wireless communication circuits on transponder cards, non-contact smart cards or RFIDs
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/22—Electrical actuation
- G08B13/24—Electrical actuation by interference with electromagnetic field distribution
- G08B13/2402—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting
- G08B13/2465—Aspects related to the EAS system, e.g. system components other than tags
- G08B13/2468—Antenna in system and the related signal processing
- G08B13/2471—Antenna signal processing by receiver or emitter
Definitions
- the invention relates to the field of anti-theft systems for goods.
- the invention relates to an anti-theft system to secure goods comprising a base station that generates an electromagnetic field emitted by an antenna, and one or more cooperating with the base station, one each Response security-generating goods security labels, with each goods such a security label is attached and being before leaving of the goods-secured place the goods by the electromagnetic Field of the base station must be kept at which Carrying out a security label that can be detected by the base station Response signal is generated.
- the invention further relates to a method for automatic detection and identification of a security tag by a base station.
- Theft protection systems of this type are used, for example, in department stores used to counter in particular higher-priced goods Protect theft better.
- a base station through which the Covering the area of the output generates an electromagnetic field becomes.
- Security tags are attached to the goods to be protected. When lawfully paying for such goods, is usually either removed the security tag at the checkout or destroyed. If a person with the paid goods passes through on Electromagnetic field exit of the department store, responds the base station is not. On the other hand, would like a person with a product an existing or still functional security label pass through the electromagnetic field of the base station, then such a security tag is detected by the base station, whereupon an alarm is triggered.
- Security labels are known which are detectable for the base station Response signal of an electromagnetic type, for example by energy absorption produce.
- an anti-theft system is for example described in EP 0 663 657 A1.
- An energy absorptive working system uses one from coil and in the security label Capacitor formed resonant circuit. Through this resonant circuit a second when entering the electromagnetic field of the base station generates an alternating magnetic field, which is transmitted via an antenna from the base station can be detected.
- Such systems usually work in the HF range at 1 to 2 MHz.
- System can also be outwitted by putting the security label in front passing through the electromagnetic generated by the base station Field is shielded from this.
- a shield can already be achieved in that such a security label or the entire goods with the security label in aluminum foil or other metallic foils is wrapped.
- Such a system could be outwitted by the fact that Goods protected with such security labels in an aluminum case transported through the electromagnetic field of the base station to be brought. Because the electromagnetic generated by the base station Field is not affected and thus the base station has no response signal accordingly, no alarm is triggered.
- a problem in these known systems is also in of several such security tags in the detection field of the base station enter one after the other.
- the first security label then blocks the base station in alarm.
- security tags entering the base station then pass the base station unnoticed.
- One in the area of such The base station's hidden security label can cover the entire Put the system out of operation permanently.
- the invention lies on the basis of this prior art discussed hence the task of proposing an anti-theft system, which is less sensitive to manipulation.
- the invention is also based on the object of a Manipulation possibility improved method for automatic Detection and identification of one or more security tags to be provided by a base station.
- the system-related object is achieved in that the base station has a low-frequency LF stage with an LF transceiver and that those interacting with the base station Security tags each have an active transponder with an LF stage operating on the same frequency with an LF transceiver unit include, so that a bidirectional signal transmission is feasible between the base station and a transponder.
- both the base station and the security tag are in the low frequency range working NF stage with one NF transmitter / receiver unit each is assigned, with data transmission in the frequency domain between 5 and 100 KHz is appropriate, a system is set up, its signal transmission based on the selected frequency is not easily shielded. It is intended that the electromagnetic field generated at the base station NF stage is a cyclical one in which a control signal is sent.
- the security label an NF level with an NF transmitter / receiver unit has an active security tag designed as a transponder created so that between the base station and such security tag designed as a transponder a bidirectional Signal transmission (data transmission) is possible. With such a bidirectional Signal transmission can have multiple authorization checks or validity checks are carried out so that an alarm is triggered can be coupled to different verification steps. It also significantly reduces false alarms.
- the NF stage sends the base station for the purpose of further checking after receiving a response signal sent by the transponder an acknowledgment signal.
- This acknowledgment signal can either be encoded as an enable signal, which indicates the successful Acknowledgment of completion of the bidirectional data transmission.
- On the system side is such a transponder (with the goods attached to it) authorized to leave the secured place of goods.
- a non-enable signal can also be sent, which Non-release signal either as part of an anti-collision monitoring by the base station an assignment of those receiving the response signals Represents the base station or the transponder to a new one
- the response signal is emitted or another control command is issued can be.
- the for Sending the response signal of the transponder provided transmitters can be, for example, the NF transmitter of the NF stage.
- such System not only to be used as an anti-theft system, but the response signal sent by the transponder can be additional Contain information about the goods identity, for example that these response signals received by the base station correspond to a corresponding one Goods management can be fed.
- the one sent by the base station Acknowledgment of receipt signal is sent on the NF route, especially to overcome manipulative shields. Since the The base station is expediently not battery-operated but powered by an electrical network works, is the transmission power of the NF level of the base station many times higher than the transmission power of the NF level of the transponder. Therefore, an acknowledgment signal sent on the NF line can also to penetrate possible shields. Is a shielded such security tag with respect to the RF link, sends the NF level of the base station, since there is no response signal from the RF receiver the transponder has been received, also no acknowledgment signal out.
- the NF transmitter unit of the NF stage of the transponder used to send an alarm signal on the NF line.
- This alarm signal is received by the base station, whereupon a Alarm is triggered.
- An acoustic signal from the base station can be used as an alarm and / or visual alarm, such as a siren, can be actuated.
- it can also send out an alarm signal on the NF line instead of the other or in addition to the other alarm mechanisms be sent, which alarm signal is a control command contains, which puts the transponder into an alarm mode.
- the the alarm triggered by the transponder can also be visual or acoustic Be natural so that the transponder set in alarm mode by the security personnel is detectable.
- the RF level of the transponder is at an antenna detuning device connected with the help of the detection of one Antenna detuning, for example by shielding an antenna detuning is brought about. It is provided that normally Detune air-tuned antenna on metal.
- a bidirectional dialog is carried out, both the transponder and the base station, each with an RF stage, comprising an RF transceiver equip.
- RF stage comprising an RF transceiver equip.
- the base station can receive an alarm signal receiver be assigned, whose reception area essentially is arranged outside the effective range of the base station. Should that Route on which a response signal is received by the base station should be occupied, and the transponder on the NF route have received a corresponding interference signal which the transponder in an alarm position switches and the transponder then an alarm signal transmits, this can be from the undisturbed alarm signal receiver be received. After receiving this signal, the Alarm signal receiver then a system alarm corresponding to one of system alarm triggered by the base station.
- the anti-theft system it is particularly advantageous to add the anti-theft system to operate with an anti-collision method, so that a variety of Transponders regulated by the base station detected and identified and can communicate with them.
- an anti-collision method for example, is it possible that a person with a a person-specific personal transponder is equipped and together with various with corresponding security labels equipped objects enters the effective range of the base station and all transponders are detected and identified during the stay can be.
- the base station can then assign a person and authorization check and a corresponding assignment and authorization check of the carried object be performed.
- An anti-theft security system for securing goods includes one Base station 1 and a variety of transponders, of which in figure 1 a transponder 2 is shown.
- the transponder 2 is in a security tag included, which is attached to a product to be secured is.
- the base station 1 is in the area of an exit of a goods-secured Place, such as a department store installed in such a way that the goods leaving this place, on which such a security label is attached, passed through the effective range of the base station 1 Need to become.
- the base station 1 has an NF stage 3, which consists of a transmitter unit as well a receiving unit.
- An antenna 4 is assigned to NF level 3, by means of the signals to be sent on the NF line and with which data to be received on the NF link are received can.
- the transponder 2 also includes an NF level 5, which consists of a transmitter unit and a receiver unit, which transmitter-receiver unit commonly used the NF antenna 6.
- Both modules - base station 1 and transponder 2 - also each include a processor unit, which processor units additional actuators, about an alarm system.
- a schematic diagram shows the arrangement of an anti-theft system in FIG. 1a consisting of base station 1 and an additional one Alarm signal receiver 7 shown.
- the anti-theft system is in the area of exit 8 of a department store, not shown arranged.
- the effective area 9 of the base station 1 is outlined with a short dash and represents the area in which a transponder 2 is set can receive wake-up signal sent by base station 1.
- the alarm receiver 7 is arranged outside the effective range 9, whose reception area 10 is shown in long dash lines.
- the Alarm signal receiver 7 is located, for example, at the output of a Windscreen that 8 people using this exit pass through have to.
- the base station 1 and the alarm signal receiver 7 are through a synchronization line SL connected with each other. Through this synchronization line SL there is a synchronization between the transmission mode the base station 1 and the receiving operation of the alarm signal receiver 7.
- the synchronization is designed so that the cyclical LF signal 3 of base station 1 sending the wake-up signal means that it is ready to receive of the alarm signal receiver 7 controls cyclically.
- the alarm signal receiver 7 can then a broadcast on the NF route Alarm signal received if NF level 3 does not send a wake-up signal. There is thus mutual interference between the base station 1 and the alarm signal receiver 7 avoided.
- that for the duration of the transmission of the control or wake-up signal of the base station 1 of the alarm signal receiver 7 muted via attenuators so that the alarm signal receiver 7 is influenced is avoided by sending the wake-up signal of NF level 3.
- the base station 1 checks whether the Reception channel on the NF line is busy. Is this due to a jammer manipulated and thus occupied, the base station 1 becomes a system alarm triggered. If the base station 1 works with an anti-collision algorithm, is from NF level 3 when the reception channel is occupied by communication with another transponder 2 a waiting signal Posted. If the receiving channel is free, NF level 3 transmits on NF route a wake-up signal, which when using an anti-collision method is encoded. This wake-up signal is transmitted from one to the Area of effect of the base station 1 located transponder 2 with its NF level 5 received.
- the received wake-up signal leads to a Wake up the NF transmitter 5 so that it is only in operation when the transponder 2 is actually in the effective range of the base station 1 is located and thus also response signals sent by the NF transmitter 3 are receivable from the base station 1.
- That from base station 1 received NF response signal contains an identification code. In the this code is received by the processor unit assigned to base station 1 and checked for validity.
- the transponder data is uniquely decoded and the transponder is thus identified an acknowledgment signal is sent from base station 1 to transponder 2.
- the acknowledgment signal represents, as it were, an acknowledgment signal with which the Transponder 2 receives the message that its response signal has been received, properly decoded and a transponder identification took place Has.
- the transponder 2 Since the communication between the base station and the transponder 2 can sometimes be temporarily disturbed, the transponder 2 repeats Reception of the alarm signal corresponding to a predetermined number (n times) his response signal. It is provided that the number of repetition of the response signal is adjustable. If after the repetition of the answer signal repetition no acknowledgment signal from the transponder 2 has been received, the transponder sends at (n + 1) .mal for the last time a response signal. He also receives this response signal no acknowledgment signal from base station 1, the transponder 2 switches over to malfunction. In this case, sends the transponder has a special alarm signal. This alarm signal can be designed, for example, as a continuous signal. Instead of or together with the transmission of an alarm signal, the transponder 2 itself also generate an optical or acoustic alarm.
- the alarm signal sent by the transponder 2 can be used in the event that the NF receiver 3 or the alarm signal receiver of the base station 1 is manipulatively blocked by a jammer, not received become. For this purpose it lends itself outside the sphere of activity the base station 1 to another alarm signal receiver 7 position, from which the alarm signal of transponder 2 is then received and which then triggers a system alarm.
- This Security is increased by the fact that in bidirectional communication between the base station 1 and the transponder 2 checking mechanisms are provided and that certain non-compliance Criteria an alarm is triggered.
- FIG 3 is another base station 11 and another transponder 12, each of which includes an NF stage 13, 14, each an LF transceiver unit also have an RF stage 15, 16. It is provided that the RF stage 16 of the transponder 12 as The transmitter and the RF stage 15 of the base station 11 are designed as receivers is.
- the antenna 17 assigned to the HF stage 16 is connected to a detuning circuit 18 connected with which the antenna 17 with respect to its Match can be detuned.
- the anti-theft system shown in Figure 3 is particularly useful when the data transmitted in the response signal are so extensive that a Data transmission on the NF line takes too much time would. Especially when using an anti-collision method the provision of an RF stage 15, 16 is therefore appropriate.
- this transponder 12 In addition to the operating sequence shown in FIG. 2, this takes place in this Anti-theft system, as shown in Figure 4, in addition to Checking the occupancy of the NF reception channel including an occupancy check of the RF reception channel of the RF stage 15 of the base station 11. In the event that after waking up through NF level 14 of Transponders 12 multiple, i.e. (n + 1) times unsuccessful and therefore without receipt an acknowledgment signal, the response signal on the RF link has been sent, this transponder 12 also takes place Switchover to a fault or alarm mode. This sturgeon or Alarm operation can be according to the embodiment shown in Figure 1 be trained.
- the response signal sent by the RF stage 16 not received this may be because the security tag, i.e. the transponder 12 has been manipulated by shielding is.
- the antenna 17 is then detuned on the basis of the Detuning circuit 18, whereby the influence on the RF antenna 17 through the outer shield largely cleared, at least however is minimized.
- the transponder can also do this by receiving a corresponding control signal on the NF line switched from the base station 11 to the toggle operation described above become.
- FIG. 1 The operation of a further anti-theft security system is schematized in FIG shown, in which both the base station and the Transponder in addition to a complete NF level, a complete HF level have as a transceiver.
- the system can then have a bidirectional dialogue on the HF link the base station and the transponder take place.
- Such Design is particularly useful if between the two Modules an increased data exchange should take place; e.g. around against eavesdropping to carry out an authentication of the radio link or to replace those Protect data with passwords or encrypt it too to ship.
- With bidirectional data traffic on the HF route it is far safer, possible manipulations triggered by shielding or to be recognized by third-party or jamming stations.
- a bidirectional LF section is also optionally available the base station the alarm mode can be initiated in the transponder.
- the transmission power of the base station on the NF section is much stronger and thus also NF-related shielding attempts penetrated and thus received by the transponder can.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
Claims (20)
- Système antivol pour protéger les articles comprenant une station de base qui génère un champ électromagnétique diffusé à partir d'une antenne et une ou plusieurs étiquettes de surveillance d'articles produisant chacune, en agissant conjointement avec la station de base, un signal de réponse, sachant qu'une telle étiquette de surveillance est apposée sur chaque article et qu'avant de quitter le lieu placé sous surveillance, les articles doivent traverser le champ électromagnétique de la station de base et qu'au passage de l'étiquette de surveillance se produit un signal de réponse enregistrable par la station de base caractérisé en ce que la station de base (1, 11) présente un étage BF (3, 13) fonctionnant à basses fréquences, avec une unité d'émission et de réception et que les étiquettes de surveillance, agissant conjointement avec la station de base (1, 11), comprennent chacune un transpondeur actif (2, 12) avec un étage BF (5, 14) fonctionnant sur la même fréquence avec une unité d'émission et de réception BF, de manière à permettre une transmission bidirectionnelle des signaux entre la station de base (1, 11) et un transpondeur (2,12).
- Système antivol selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'unité d'émission et de réception BF (5, 14) du transpondeur (2, 12) ne présenté qu'une seule antenne (6) qui sert indifféremment à la réception et à l'émission d'un signal.
- Système antivol selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé en que le transpondeur (12) comporte un étage HF (16), avec émetteur HF, fonctionnant à hautes fréquences, qui puisse être réveillé par une unité d'émission et de réception BF (14), et en ce que la station de base (1, 11) comporte un étage HF (15) avec un récepteur HF, fonctionnant à la même fréquence.
- Système antivol selon la revendication 3, caractérisé en ce que l'émetteur HF (16) du transpondeur (12) soit raccordé à un désaccordeur d'antenne (18).
- Système antivol selon la revendication 3 ou 4, caractérisé en ce que la station de base tout comme le transpondeur comportent en guise d'étage HF, une unité d'émission et de réception HF.
- Système antivol selon l'une des revendications 1 à 5, caractérisé en ce que le récepteur BF de l'étage BF (3, 13) soit conçu comme un récepteur d'alarme pour réceptionner un signal d'alarme émis par le transpondeur (2, 12).
- Système antivol selon l'une des revendications 1 à 6, caractérisé en ce que l'on affecte à la station de base (1, 11) un autre récepteur d'alarme (7), dont le champ de réception (10) soit essentiellement en dehors du champ d'action (9) de la station de base (1).
- Procédé pour détecter et identifier automatiquement une étiquette de surveillance d'articles par une station de base (1, 11) en utilisant deux étages BF (3, 13 ; 5, 14), sachant qu'un étage BF (3, 13), avec une unité d'émission et de réception BF, est affecté à la station de base (1, 11) et qu'un autre étage BF (5, 14), avec une unité d'émission et de réception BF, est affecté à un transpondeur actif (2, 12), selon les étapes suivantes :émission d'un signal de contrôle basse fréquence par l'étage BF (3, 13) de la station de base (1, 11),réception du signal de contrôle par l'étage BF (5, 14) du transpondeur (2, 12)émission d'un signal de réponse par un émetteur (5, 16) affecté au transpondeur (2, 12),réception du signal de réponse par l'unité de réception (3, 15) de la station de base (1, 11) qui fonctionne sur la même fréquenceémission d'un signal de confirmation de réception par la station de base (1, 11) etréception du signal de confirmation de réception par le transpondeur (2, 12),sachant qu'en cas de réception d'un signal de non-validation par le transpondeur (12) ou en cas de non-réception de signal de confirmation de réception après répétition de l'émission d'un signal de réponse, le transpondeur (2, 12) déclenche, sur la voie de transmission BF, une alarme etsachant qu'avant et/ou pendant la transmission du signal par la station de base (1, 11) un contrôle d'occupation s'effectue pour constater une occupation par une source extérieure de la voie de transmission utilisée pour la réception du signal de réponse et, qu'en cas de constatation d'une occupation par une source extérieure, un signal d'occupation sera émis.
- Procédé selon la revendication 8, caractérisé en ce que le signal de contrôle soit un signal de réveil qui, après sa réception par le récepteur BF (5, 14) du transpondeur (2, 12) réveille l'émetteur (5, 16) affecté à ce dernier et prévu pour émettre le signal de réponse.
- Procédé selon la revendication 8 ou 9, caractérisé en ce que le signal de réponse du trahspondeur (2) soit émis par l'étage BF (5) qui lui est affecté.
- Procédé selon la revendication 8 ou 9, caractérisé en ce que le signal de réponse du transpondeur (12) soit émis par un étage HF (16) affecté au transpondeur (12) et qu'avant ou pendant la transmission du signal par la station de base (11) s'effectue un contrôle d'occupation pour vérifier l'occupation par une source extérieure des voies de transmission (BF et HF) utilisées et qu'en cas de constatation de l'occupation par une source extérieure, au moins l'une des deux voies de transmission émette un signal d'occupation.
- Procédé selon la revendication 11, caractérisé en qu'un dialogue bidirectionnel s'établisse sur la voie de transmission HF entre la station de base et le transpondeur.
- Procédé selon la revendication 11 ou 12, caractérisé en ce que l'étage BF (3) de la station de base (11) émette, en cas de dérangement dans la réception du signal de réponse HF du transpondeur (12), un signal de commande qui place le transpondeur (12) dans un cycle de basculement.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 10 à 12, caractérisé en ce que l'antenne HF (16) du transpondeur (12) soit désaccordée lorsque l'étage NF (14) du transpondeur (12) ne réceptionne pas le signal de confirmation de réception.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 8 à 14, caractérisé en ce que le signal de contrôle émis par la station de base (11) soit un signal de réveil codé.
- Procédé selon une ou plusieurs des revendications 8 à 14, caractérisé en ce que le procédé soit mis en oeuvre avec une multitude de transpondeurs (2, 12) en procédant de surcroít à un contrôle anti-collision en ce qui concerne la capacité de réception de l'étage (3, 15), affecté à la réception des signaux de réponse, de la station de base (1, 11).
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 8 à 16, caractérisé en ce que la station de base (1, 11) émette un signal de contrôle cyclique sur la voie de transmission BF, et qu'un signal d'alarme émis par le transpondeur (2, 12) soit réceptionné par un récepteur de signal d'alarme (7) qui, par rapport à l'émission du signal de contrôle, est synchronisé de manière anticyclique, de manière à permettre la réception d'un signal d'alarme lorsque la station de base (1, 11) n'émet aucun signal de contrôle.
- Procédé selon la revendication 17, caractérisé en ce que le circuit d'entrée du récepteur de signal d'alarme (7) soit commuté en mode muet par des éléments amortisseurs, tant que le signal de contrôle de la station de base (1, 11) est émis.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 8 à 18, caractérisé en ce que le signal de réveil ou de contrôle émis par la station de base (1, 11) soit utilisé comme un signal de synchronisation pour l'émission synchronisée d'un signal d'alarme émis par les transpondeurs (2, 12) et que le contenu des données du signal d'alarme émis par les transpondeurs (2, 12) soit identique.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 11 à 19, caractérisé en ce qu'un transpondeur (12) placé en mode alarme émette son signal d'alarme en commutant de manière répétée entre les différents modes d'émission et en émettant alternativement sur la voie de transmission BF et sur la voie de transmission HF.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE19745953A DE19745953C2 (de) | 1997-10-17 | 1997-10-17 | Diebstahl-Sicherungssystem sowie Verfahren zur automatischen Detektion und Identifikation eines Warensicherungsetiketts durch eine Basisstation |
DE19745953 | 1997-10-17 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0919971A2 EP0919971A2 (fr) | 1999-06-02 |
EP0919971A3 EP0919971A3 (fr) | 1999-12-08 |
EP0919971B1 true EP0919971B1 (fr) | 2003-01-22 |
Family
ID=7845862
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP98118521A Expired - Lifetime EP0919971B1 (fr) | 1997-10-17 | 1998-09-30 | Système et procédé antivol pour détecter et identifier automatiquement une étiquette de surveillance d'articles |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6104285A (fr) |
EP (1) | EP0919971B1 (fr) |
DE (2) | DE19745953C2 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (33)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7009516B2 (en) * | 1998-03-12 | 2006-03-07 | D.I.P.O. Sa | Electronic sensor system for monitoring activity of objects |
US6362738B1 (en) * | 1998-04-16 | 2002-03-26 | Motorola, Inc. | Reader for use in a radio frequency identification system and method thereof |
DE19824528C1 (de) * | 1998-06-02 | 1999-11-25 | Anatoli Stobbe | Verfahren zum Detektieren eines oder mehrerer Transponder sowie Anordnung und Verwendung einer solchen Anordnung |
DE19859947C2 (de) * | 1998-12-28 | 2001-02-01 | Anatoli Stobbe | System zur räumlichen Zuordnung wenigstens eines Transponders zu Zellen eines Detektionsgebietes, Basisstation sowie Transponder |
EP1018692B1 (fr) | 1999-01-08 | 2006-06-28 | Anatoli Stobbe | Système de sécurité, transpondeur et dispositif de réception |
US6396438B1 (en) | 1999-09-24 | 2002-05-28 | Slc Technologies | System and method for locating radio frequency identification tags using three-phase antenna |
US6661335B1 (en) | 1999-09-24 | 2003-12-09 | Ge Interlogix, Inc. | System and method for locating radio frequency identification tags |
US6452504B1 (en) | 1999-09-24 | 2002-09-17 | Ge Interlogix, Inc. | System and method for communication with radio frequency identification tags using tow message DFM protocol |
US6693511B1 (en) | 1999-09-24 | 2004-02-17 | Ge Interlogix, Inc. | System and method for communicating with dormant radio frequency identification tags |
US6778066B2 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2004-08-17 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Personal identification badge that resets on the removal of the badge from the wearer |
USRE49644E1 (en) * | 2002-03-14 | 2023-09-05 | Odyssey Wireless, Inc. | Systems and/or methods of data acquisition from a transceiver |
US7030750B2 (en) * | 2002-07-16 | 2006-04-18 | Bert Taeho Lee | Detachable entrance and exit gate with a combined commodity burglarproofing and small arms detecting system |
US6989741B2 (en) * | 2002-08-07 | 2006-01-24 | G-5 Electronics | Object tracking |
DE10325909A1 (de) * | 2003-06-05 | 2005-01-05 | Deutsche Post Ag | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Sicherung von Objekten |
US7474215B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2009-01-06 | Checkpoint Systems, Inc. | Alarm systems, remote communication devices, and article security methods |
US7269725B2 (en) * | 2003-12-17 | 2007-09-11 | Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Autonomic binding of subsystems to system to prevent theft |
DE102004018555B4 (de) | 2004-03-25 | 2007-10-11 | Atmel Germany Gmbh | Verfahren zur Datenkommunikation zwischen einer Basisstation und einem Transponder, Basisstation zur Datenkommunikation sowie Datenkommunikationssystem |
US7034687B2 (en) * | 2004-04-29 | 2006-04-25 | Comm-Engines | Error-avoiding anti-theft surveillance system |
US20060145848A1 (en) * | 2004-12-28 | 2006-07-06 | Alpha Security Products, Inc. | Electronic security device and system for articles of merchandise |
US7737843B2 (en) * | 2005-12-23 | 2010-06-15 | Invue Security Products Inc. | Programmable alarm module and system for protecting merchandise |
US7737844B2 (en) | 2005-12-23 | 2010-06-15 | Invue Security Products Inc. | Programming station for a security system for protecting merchandise |
US7737846B2 (en) * | 2005-12-23 | 2010-06-15 | Invue Security Products Inc. | Security system and method for protecting merchandise |
US7737845B2 (en) * | 2005-12-23 | 2010-06-15 | Invue Security Products Inc. | Programmable key for a security system for protecting merchandise |
US20110254661A1 (en) | 2005-12-23 | 2011-10-20 | Invue Security Products Inc. | Programmable security system and method for protecting merchandise |
US7598861B2 (en) * | 2006-01-06 | 2009-10-06 | Checkpoint Systems, Inc. | Security storage container having an internal alarm |
US7663489B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2010-02-16 | Checkpoint Systems, Inc. | Alarm systems, wireless alarm devices, and article security methods |
US7538680B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2009-05-26 | Checkpoint Systems, Inc. | Alarm systems, wireless alarm devices, and article security methods |
US7796028B1 (en) * | 2006-08-01 | 2010-09-14 | Battelle Energy Alliance, Llc | Circuitry, systems and methods for detecting magnetic fields |
DE102006047568A1 (de) * | 2006-10-04 | 2008-04-10 | Universität Dortmund | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Konfiguration und Steuerung von technischen Einrichtungen |
US20080204239A1 (en) * | 2007-02-28 | 2008-08-28 | Christopher Marszalek | Apparatus, system and/or method for wirelessly securing and/or for wirelessly monitoring an article |
US11017656B2 (en) | 2011-06-27 | 2021-05-25 | Invue Security Products Inc. | Programmable security system and method for protecting merchandise |
CN107209977A (zh) | 2014-11-18 | 2017-09-26 | Invue安全产品公司 | 钥匙和安全装置 |
US10750886B2 (en) | 2017-10-27 | 2020-08-25 | Walmart Apollo, Llc | Systems and methods of objectively confirming customer self-scanning of products in a retail store |
Family Cites Families (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3689885A (en) * | 1970-09-15 | 1972-09-05 | Transitag Corp | Inductively coupled passive responder and interrogator unit having multidimension electromagnetic field capabilities |
US3914762A (en) * | 1973-12-27 | 1975-10-21 | Rca Corp | Electronic identification system |
US4352098A (en) * | 1979-05-18 | 1982-09-28 | Parmeko Limited | Surveillance systems |
US4413254A (en) * | 1981-09-04 | 1983-11-01 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Combined radio and magnetic energy responsive surveillance marker and system |
US4658263A (en) * | 1985-02-11 | 1987-04-14 | Allied Corporation | Dual antenna for magnetic markers |
US4679035A (en) * | 1985-07-30 | 1987-07-07 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Tri-signal electromagnetic article surveillance system |
US4686513A (en) * | 1985-09-30 | 1987-08-11 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Electronic surveillance using self-powered article attached tags |
US4736207A (en) * | 1986-01-31 | 1988-04-05 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Tag device and method for electronic article surveillance |
JPS6337279A (ja) * | 1986-08-01 | 1988-02-17 | Wako Sangyo:Kk | 物品の移動検知システム |
US4818885A (en) * | 1987-06-30 | 1989-04-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Electron beam writing method and system using large range deflection in combination with a continuously moving table |
JP2597623B2 (ja) * | 1987-10-08 | 1997-04-09 | 株式会社トキメック | 電磁誘導結合による電源供給方式 |
US5028918A (en) * | 1989-12-18 | 1991-07-02 | Dairy Equipment Company | Identification transponder circuit |
DE4010327C1 (fr) * | 1990-03-30 | 1991-12-19 | Helmut 5330 Koenigswinter De Braehler | |
US5264829A (en) * | 1992-06-15 | 1993-11-23 | Knogo Corporation | Method and apparatus for theft detection using digital signal processing |
US5491468A (en) * | 1993-06-24 | 1996-02-13 | Westinghouse Electric Corporation | Identification system and method with passive tag |
NL9400076A (nl) * | 1994-01-17 | 1995-09-01 | Nedap Nv | Diefstaldetectie- en identificatiesysteem. |
US5640002A (en) * | 1995-08-15 | 1997-06-17 | Ruppert; Jonathan Paul | Portable RF ID tag and barcode reader |
FR2738370B1 (fr) * | 1995-09-06 | 1997-11-07 | France Telecom | Installation pour l'echange d'informations a distance entre un objet portatif passif et une station, objet et station correspondants |
EP0798681A1 (fr) * | 1996-03-29 | 1997-10-01 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Signal d'interrogation d'impulsion dans un système de surveillance d'articles fréquences harmoniques |
US5686513A (en) * | 1996-09-09 | 1997-11-11 | Zimmer Aktiengesellschaft | Process for the production of stabilizer concentrate for polyamide |
-
1997
- 1997-10-17 DE DE19745953A patent/DE19745953C2/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1998
- 1998-09-30 DE DE59806994T patent/DE59806994D1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-09-30 EP EP98118521A patent/EP0919971B1/fr not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-10-16 US US09/174,529 patent/US6104285A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE19745953C2 (de) | 2002-12-05 |
EP0919971A2 (fr) | 1999-06-02 |
US6104285A (en) | 2000-08-15 |
DE59806994D1 (de) | 2003-02-27 |
DE19745953A1 (de) | 1999-04-22 |
EP0919971A3 (fr) | 1999-12-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0919971B1 (fr) | Système et procédé antivol pour détecter et identifier automatiquement une étiquette de surveillance d'articles | |
EP0755026B1 (fr) | Procédé d'identification automatique d'un nombre inconnu de transpondeurs par un lecteur et dispositif d'identification pour la mise en oeuvre de ce procédé | |
DE69316830T2 (de) | Fernbetätigungssystem zum Sperren und Entsperren von Türen und Öffnungsteilen eines Kraftfahrzeugs | |
EP0646265B1 (fr) | Procede et installation pour assurer la securite de personnes ou d'objets | |
DE602004010838T2 (de) | System zum erkennen von hochfrequenz-identifikationsetiketten | |
DE3876257T2 (de) | Erfassung nichterlaubter wegnahme von vorrichtungen mit diebstahlsicherungsmarke. | |
EP0673003B1 (fr) | Système d'accès contrÔlé sans enclenchement de clé | |
DE19519932A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Metalldetektion mit integrierter Transponderabfrage | |
DE2254637A1 (de) | Schaltungsanordnung fuer ueberwachungsanlagen | |
EP1236171B1 (fr) | Procede pour faire fonctionner un transpondeur | |
DE19613413A1 (de) | Alarmgebendes elektronisches Artikelüberwachungssystem | |
DE19713736A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Erfassen und Identifizieren von tragbaren Benutzerkennungseinheiten | |
DE19519450A1 (de) | Kontrollsystem | |
DE10143727A1 (de) | Im Fahrzeug installiertes Schlüsselprüfsystem mit Prüfungshistorienspeicher | |
DE60002856T2 (de) | Verfahren zur verwaltung von elektronischen fahrkarten und einrichtung zu dessen durchführung | |
DE69607232T2 (de) | Verfahren zum Verhindern von Ladendiebstahl und elektronisches Diebstahl-Detektierungssystem | |
EP1108101B1 (fr) | Systeme donnant l'autorisation d'acceder et de demarrer/faire rouler une automobile | |
DE3604307C2 (de) | Verfahren zur Sicherung von Gegenständen gegen Entnahme durch unbefugte Personen | |
DE60211975T2 (de) | Regel- und Steuervorrichtung zur Überwachung, zur Neutralisation und/oder zur Vernichtung von Wertsachen, Dokumenten und/oder Gegenständen | |
DE69524926T2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Fernüberwachung von in einem Raum abgelegten Gegenständen | |
EP0287686B1 (fr) | Dispositif de fermeture à surveillance | |
DE10202321B4 (de) | System und Methode zur elektronischen Authentifizierung | |
DE9113534U1 (de) | Diebstahl-Schutzsystem für Kraftfahrzeuge | |
DE102005036088A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Orten eines Objekts | |
DE3916614C2 (fr) |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20000110 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Free format text: DE FR GB |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20030122 |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 59806994 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20030227 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20031023 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20110713 Year of fee payment: 14 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20111005 Year of fee payment: 14 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20110715 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20120930 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20130531 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 59806994 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130403 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120930 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130403 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121001 |