EP0746843B1

EP0746843B1 - Global quieting system for stationary induction apparatus

Info

Publication number: EP0746843B1
Application number: EP94926620A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Stephen Hildebrand; Ziqiang Hu
Original assignee: NCT Group Inc
Current assignee: NCT Group Inc
Priority date: 1993-09-09
Filing date: 1994-09-02
Publication date: 2001-11-14
Anticipated expiration: 2014-09-02
Also published as: CA2169967A1; ATE208944T1; US5617479A; DE69429111D1; CA2169967C; WO1995007530A1; EP0746843A4; DE69429111T2; JPH08511634A; JP3031635B2; EP0746843A1

Abstract

The present invention relates generally to global noise or sound control and, more particularly, to the control or sound radiated from stationary induction apparatus such as power transformers and shunt reactors by use of active enclosures and active panels. The purpose of the invention is to markedly reduce the radiation of sound from the machine to all observation points in the surrounding field with a very lightweight, compact, non-airtight structure which does not impair maintenance or repair of the machine.

Description

This invention relates to a stationary induction apparatus and to a method of designing such an apparatus.
Stationary induction devices are used in utility substations and elsewhere for electric power transmission. Such devices typically comprise a tank containing an inductive element (such as a power transformer or shunt reactor) immersed in a substantially incompressible fluid. These devices produce a low-frequency hum that is a source of noise pollution for persons working or living near the substations. The noise is due to magnetostriction of the core of the inductive element being transmitted to the tank either directly or through the fluid. The vibrating tank in turn radiates acoustic energy to the far field. Such devices in North America generate 120 Hz tones (ie twice the mains frequency), plus harmonics of the 120 Hz fundamental. It will be appreciated that, in Europe with a mains frequency of 50 Hz, such devices generate 100 Hz tones plus harmonics of the 100 Hz fundamental. This invention is concerned with reduction of the acoustic energy which is radiated to the far field.
This invention relates more specifically to a stationary induction apparatus comprising: an induction device which in operation produces hum having a fundamental frequency; a panel mounted adjacent, but spaced from, and facing a surface portion of the induction device; means for vibrating the panel; a sensor for providing a sensor signal; and means for driving the vibrating means in dependence upon the sensor signal;
Such an apparatus is known from patent document EP-A-0083718. In that known apparatus, the induction device has a tank with upper and lower, outwardly-protruding reinforcing ribs. Such panels are mounted between the upper and lower reinforcing ribs so as to cover the side wall portions of the tank between the reinforcing ribs. The panels are sound insulating panels so as to absorb sound generated by the side wall portions. According to EP-A-0083718, the side wall portions cause primary noise which is reduced by the sound insulating panels, but vibrations are transmitted through the reinforcing ribs to the sound insulating panels so that the sound insulating panels radiate secondary noises. EP-A-0083718 tackles the reduction of such secondary noises by mounting such vibrating means and sensors (in the form of vibration sensors) on the sound insulating panels and driving the vibrating means in ante-phase so as the cancel out the secondary vibrations of the sound insulating panels.
It will be apparent that the arrangement described in EP-A-0083718 is reliant upon the sound insulating panels covering all of the side wall portions of the tank between the reinforcing ribs and being able to absorb sufficiently all of the so-called "primary" noises. It is also apparent that the arrangement described in EP-A-0083718 does not tackle the issue of noise being radiated directly from the uncovered reinforcing ribs.
It will be appreciated form the following detailed description, particularly with reference to Figures 3 to 10, that it has now been realised that, with a tank with upper and lower reinforcing ribs (as described in EP-A-0083718 and in the specific embodiments herein), it can be the ribs which are main sources of hum at the fundamental magnetostriction frequency, and that the side wall portions of the tank between the reinforcing ribs can tend to produce hum at harmonics of the fundamental magnetostriction frequency.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the induction apparatus is characterised in that: the panel is arranged to face a surface portion of the induction device producing hum as a large standing wave at the fundamental frequency; the sensor (such as a microphone) is arranged for sensing sound pressure or sound intensity in the space between the panel and the hum-producing portion at a location part-way therebetween; and the driving means is arranged to drive the vibrating means at the fundamental frequency so as to counter the hum produced by the hum-producing portion.
It will therefore be appreciated that the panel in the present invention is located so as to counter hum at the fundamental frequency, by contrast with the panels of EP-A-0083718 which are located so as to absorb, rather than counter, hum and which are not apparently located so as to affect surface portions producing hum predominantly at the fundamental frequency. The panel used in the present invention can be of very lightweight, thin material. Also, in the present invention, sound pressure or sound intensity part-way between the panel and the hum-producing portion is sensed (by contrast with the sensing of panel vibration in EP-A-0083718), and is preferably minimised through the action of the vibrating means and driving means, as a result of which substantial cancellation in the far-field can be achieved.
Preferably, said hum-producing surface portion which the panel faces is generally at a position producing a peak in sound intensity at the fundamental frequency.
Preferably, the panel is curved to provide dimensional stability.
The panel is preferably tuned so that in one mode of vibration thereof the resonant frequency thereof is generally equal to the fundamental hum frequency, and/or is preferably tuned so that in another mode of vibration thereof the resonant frequency thereof is generally equal to a harmonic frequency of the hum.
Preferably, the panel is one of a plurality of such panels each for a respective such hum-producing surface portion of the induction device, each panel being associated with a respective such vibrating means and a respective such sensor.
In the case where the hum produced by the induction device has at least one harmonic, the apparatus preferably further comprises an actuator mounted on a surface portion of the induction device generally at a position producing a peak in sound intensity at the frequency of the harmonic, and a sensor mounted on the actuator for sensing vibration of the actuator and producing a vibration signal; and the driving means is preferably operable to drive the actuator at the harmonic frequency in dependence upon the vibration signal so as to reduce the hum at the harmonic frequency. The mounting of a sensor on an actuator is known per se from Vardaran et al, "Active control of sound radiation from a vibrating structure", IEEE 1991 Ultrasonics Symposium - Proceedings, pages 991-994.
Preferably, the actuator is one of a plurality of such actuators each for a respective such harmonic hum-producing portion. In this case, the driving means may be operable to drive at least two of the actuators in phase or in ante-phase with respect to one another.
Preferably, the, or at least one of the, vibrating means and/or the actuator, or at least one of the actuators, comprises a piezo-ceramic actuator.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of designing such an apparatus, comprising the steps of: operating the induction device without operating the driving means; detecting a surface portion of the induction device producing a peak in sound intensity at the fundamental frequency; and locating the panel so as to face the detected surface portion.
In accordance with a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of designing such an apparatus having an actuator for reducing hum at the harmonic frequency, the method comprising the steps of: operating the induction device without operating the driving means; detecting a surface portion of the induction device producing a peak in sound intensity at the harmonic frequency; and mounting the actuator on the detected surface portion.
A specific embodiment of the present invention will now be described, purely by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
These and other objects will become apparent to those reasonably skilled in the art when reference is made to the accompanying drawings in which:
Figure 1 is a cross-sectional view of a transformer showing actuators used for the active enclosure and active panels, and microphone sensors.
Figure 2 shows three views of a transformer tank.
Figure 3 shows a vibration test result for the east side of the transformer tank shown in Figure 2 at 120 Hz.
Figure 4 shows the sound intensity for the east side of the transformer tank shown in Figure 2 at 120 Hz.
Figure 5 shows a vibration test result for the east side of the transformer tank shown in Figure 2 at 240 Hz.
Figure 6 shows the sound intensity for the east side of the transformer tank shown in Figure 2 at 240 Hz.
Figure 7 shows a vibration test result for the north side of the transformer tank shown in Figure 2 at 120 Hz.
Figure 8 shows the sound intensity for the north side of the transformer tank shown in Figure 2 at 120 Hz.
Figure 9 shows a vibration test result for the north side of the transformer tank shown in Figure 2 at 240 Hz.
Figure 10 shows the sound intensity for the north side of the transformer tank shown in Figure 2 at 240 Hz.
Figure 11 shows a detailed view of a multilayer ceramic with a cut-away view of the tank wall such that the tank wall acts as an active enclosure.
Figure 12 shows a cut-away view of a tank wall showing two horizontal ribs. Also shown is a typical scheme for locating the piezo-actuators on the tank wall.
Figure 13 is a cross-sectional view of one configuration of an active panel.
Figure 14 is a perspective view of one configuration of an active panel.
Figures 15a and 15b show how an active panel is tuned for optimal performance.
Figure 16 is a cut-away view of a rib of a transformer tank with an adjacent view of an active panel. This figure shows a typical interaction between a transformer tank and an active panel.
Figures 17 and 18 show a preferred layout of piezoceramics and active panels for the east and north sides of the transformer shown in Figure 2.
Figure 19 shows a cross-section of a different transformer tank design. Note the supports between the tank and the foundation. Figure 19 shows some typical alternative locations for the piezo-actuators and active panels, including the use of actuators and sensors to quiet radiator noise.
Figure 20 shows a block diagram of the complete active control system.
Figures 21 and 22 show the noise reductions obtained with active control system installed on the transformer for which the tank is illustrated in Figure 2.
Still other objects and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description in which has been shown and described only the preferred embodiments of the invention by way of illustration of the best mode contemplated for carrying out the invention. As will be obvious this invention is capable of other and different embodiments and its several details are capable of modifications in several obvious ways without departing from the invention. Consequently the drawings and description are to be regarded as merely illustrative in nature and not as restrictive.
Referring now to the drawings wherein like reference numerals are used throughout the various views to designate like parts, and more particularly to Figure 1; 1 denotes a transformer tank and 2 denotes the transformer core and core windings. Filling the tank 1 and surrounding the core 2 is the transformer oil 3. The transformer tank 1 rests on the foundation, 4. Typical side stiffeners 5 are shown in four places.
A typical active control system configuration is shown in Figure 1. A side view of active panels, 6 is shown in four places. These are supported from a stand 7 or attached via support 8 directly to the transformer. A side view of the piezo-actuators, 9 is shown in six places. These are attached directly to the tank 1. Several microphones are also shown. One microphone 10 is located between the active panel 6 and the rib 5. Another 11 is mounted directly to the tank. Another microphone 12 is mounted on its own stand.
Figure 2 shows a typical transformer tank 1. This tank is about 8 ft. wide by 4 ft. deep and 10 feet tall, and is for a 7.5 MVA transformer. In order to determine the manner it is producing noise, an "operating-deflection-shape" is taken for each side of the transformer. Specifically, one accelerometer is held stationary (e.g., placed on a corner of one side of the tank 1), and a second accelerometer is used to "scan" the surface of the tank 1. That is, the magnitude and phase relative to the reference accelerometer is measured every few inches along the surface of the transformer tank 1. This measurement is performed with the primary-side of the transformer energized and the secondary-side under normal load. The resulting measurements are broken into frequency components, and the resulting spatial wave forms of the surface of the tank are determined. A view of the east side of the tank 1 motion at 120 Hz is shown in Figure 3. This figure is a "snapshot" of the peak motion of the surface of the tank at 120 Hz, frozen in time. A series of horizontal lines representing the surface of the tank are shown. These horizontal lines would appear as straight lines on the undeformed surface. There is a gap along the vertical centerline because the left and right sides were measured separately and pieced together. Notice how both horizontal ribs 5 appear to be bulging outward. They both "bulge" inward 180° later in phase. This vibration data can be used to calculate the radiated sound field, using either the Rayleigh Integral (by treating each side of the transformer as if it were in an infinite baffle) or the Boundary-Element-Method. The sound intensity for the east side was calculated at a few inches from the surface of the tank using the Figure 3 measurement data and the Rayleigh Integral, and the results are shown in Figure 4. The sound intensity at the same distance from the east side was also measured with virtually identical results. The two "bulges" in Figure 4 correspond to the horizontal ribs. Clearly the rib motion is the primary acoustic source at 120 Hz. The operating deflection shape for the east side at 240 Hz is shown in Figure 5, and the corresponding predicted sound intensity is shown in Figure 6. For the east side at 240 Hz, both the ribs 5 and the tank 1 between the ribs 5 are significant sources of acoustic energy.
This process was then repeated for the north side of the tank shown in Figure 2. The operating deflection shape for the north side at 120 Hz is shown in Figure 7, and the calculated sound intensity is shown in Figure 8. The bottom of the tank 1 on the north side is a primary acoustic source at 120 Hz. The operating deflection shape for the north side at 240 Hz is shown in Figure 9, and the calculated sound intensity is shown in Figure 10. The two ribs 5 of the tank 1 on the north side are the primary acoustic source at 240 Hz.
The process was repeated for the west and south sides. Higher harmonics (i.e., 360 Hz, 480 Hz, etc.) could also have been evaluated in a similar manner, but it was concluded that the higher harmonics were not significant acoustic sources for this transformer.
Understanding the transformer tank as an acoustic source as described above is a vital first step in developing an active control strategy. Previous active-control approaches utilizing loudspeakers and microphones distant from the transformer failed due to their inability to recognize the importance of tightly coupling the anti-noise sources to the noise sources. By "tightly couple" it is meant for the anti-noise source to match as close as possible the location, distribution and level of the noise source. Tight coupling is essential in active control to obtain global reductions with minimal cost. Of course, this first requires performing baseline measurements as discussed above to understand the transformer tank as an acoustic source, so the location, distribution and level of anti-noise sources can be determined. The method of performing baseline measurements for locating actuators is an aspect of this invention.
For controlling transformer noise, the best coupling is obtained by attaching actuators directly to the transformer tank, such as piezoceramics. However, a special precaution is necessary for controlling the first harmonic of the transformer noise (120 Hz). This is because magnetostriction in the core causes a volumetric change of the core. Thus the core is effectively a displacement source at the first harmonic. Since the transformer oil is incompressible, the displacement source of the core transfers directly to the tank, so that the tank becomes a large displacement source. Controlling the vibration of this large displacement source is not practical - - an excessive amount of force would be required (i.e., there would be a lack of sufficient "control authority"). Previous attempts at controlling the first harmonic failed because they tried to control the tank vibration. The satisfactory approach is to use active panels mounted close but not touching the tank. These active panels act as tuned absorbers which capture the acoustic energy before it can be radiated to the far-field.
Figure 11 shows a detailed view of the piezo-actuator 9 attached to tank 1. This is typically a multilayer device with integral sensor, 12. Such a device is described by Hildebrand in "Low-Voltage Bender Piezo Actuator," U.S. Patent Application, Serial No. 08/057,944 filed May 5, 1993, incorporated by reference herein. Figure 11 shows the wiring configuration for a two layer device; however, many layers typically are used. The piezoceramic is suitably coated for environmental protection. The sensor can be a microphone or an accelerometer, or a combination of the two. The signal from these sensors would typically be filtered in such a way that the signal represents a far-field sound pressure measurement (unless both an accelerometer and a microphone are used, in which case the filtered signal represents the sound intensity).
Once it has been determined from base-line testing which tank modes are the primary acoustic sources, these tank modes can be controlled using properly-placed piezoceramics for the second and higher-order modes. When the piezoceramics are placed on the tank, the tank becomes an active enclosure for the transformer (or reactor) core. Figure 12 shows the method for placing the piezo-actuators on the tank. Figure 12 shows a portion of the transformer tank 1 between two ribs 5. Superimposed on the tank is an operating-deflection-shape x typical of what might be measured for the second harmonic. Let's assume that the baseline testing has shown this operating deflection shape is occurring at the second harmonic, and that it is a significant acoustic source. Piezoceramics 9a, 9b and 9c are placed at the center of each area of maximum dynamic strain energy. An actuator may not be required for each half wavelength -- sufficient control authority often can be obtained using the single piezoceramic 9b depending on how hard the tank is being driven by the core.
If the resonant frequency of the tank mode being excited is close to a harmonic of the excitation frequency, then the tank mode will appear as a standing wave with opposite half wave lengths 180° out of phase. This is the case illustrated in Figure 12. The piezoceramics 9a, 9b and 9c can then be tied to the same control channel, with the leads to the middle actuator (9b) reversed to obtain the 180° phase shift. If the resonant frequency of the tank mode being excited is not close to a harmonic of the excitation frequency, then the tank mode will appear as a traveling wave with each half wavelength having a slightly difference phase . Then each piezoceramic 9 must be tied to a different control channel.
Note that the piezoceramics for this active enclosure typically consume very little power -- less than 25 watts, and more typically less than 5 watts.
Typically piezoceramics will not provide adequate control authority for tank modes near the fundamental excitation frequency (120 Hz). This likely is due to a volumetric change in the core at the fundamental frequency, together with the incompressibility of the transformer oil. For this case, active panels are more effective than active enclosures. The compressible air between the active panel and the tank sufficiently decouples the actuator so that control-authority is not a problem.
A cross-sectional view of a preferred embodiment of an active panel is shown in Figure 13. Item 13 is a panel sheet with a slight curvature, made out of metallic or non-metallic material preferably with low structural damping. The curvature is provided since it is dimensionally more stable than a flat panel - thus it is easier to tune and keep tuned. This sheet 13 is clamped to a flat plate 14 using square tubes 16 and fasteners 17. Another view of the active panel is shown in Figure 14. The curved sheet is driven with a piezoceramic actuator 15 which has been attached such that it assumes the curvature of the curved sheet. Since the tones produced by the transformer are stationary, the active panel can easily be tuned to increase acoustic output. The sides of the panel are baffled in the preferred embodiment.
The preferred tuning method is shown in Figure 15 which shows the curved sheet as flat for illustration purposes only. Superimposed on the flat sheet are the mode shapes to which the device is tuned. The dimensions of this sheet 13 are selected such that the (0,3) mode of Figure 15a is excited when actuator 15 is driven at the fundamental resonance frequency of 120 Hz. The (1,3) mode is another effective anti-noise source; this mode shape is illustrated in Figure 15b. Tuning the panel for the (0,3) mode to be at the fundamental excitation frequency of 120 Hz will result in the (1,3) mode being at a greater resonance frequency than the second harmonic (i.e., greater than the desired 240 Hz). However, the resonance frequency for the (1,3) mode can be lowered to the desired frequency (240 Hz) without affecting the (0,3) mode by placing weights 18 (see FIG. 13) along the nodal lines for the (0,3) mode where the peaks for the (1,3) mode are located. Using this approach to tune the panel, very little power is consumed by the panel when canceling transformer noise -- typically less than 5 watts per panel, and often as little as 50 milliwatts per panel. This active panel arrangement is preferred to conventional loudspeaker designs because the distributed nature of the active panels couples much better with the distributed nature of the tank noise, and the piezoceramic driver 15 and sheet 13 are inherently more reliable than a moving coil and speaker cone. The active panel is fundamentally robust in design - it can easily be designed to be used outdoors exposed to the elements for many years without failure.
Interaction of the active panel with the transformer tank is illustrated in Figure 16. Figure 16 shows a section of the transformer tank 1 together with rib 5, with an operating deflection shape typical of the first harmonic shown with dashed lines. Also shown is an active panel 6, with the operating-deflection-shape typical of the first panel resonance. The phase relation between the tank and the active panel is clearly indicated -- as the tank is a volumetric source, the active panel is a net anti-volumetric source. The error microphone 10 is sandwiched between the tank and the active panel, and the sound pressure level at the desired frequencies is minimized at this location. In this way, the active panel can absorb acoustic energy before it is radiated to the far-field.
This microphone/active panel arrangement is preferred for several reasons. First, placing the sensor near the tank ensures a high signal-to-noise ratio (thus limiting problems with noise such as those due to wind) and reduces cross terms between curved panels. Second, this arrangement results in global cancellation in the far-field even though the microphones are located very close (usually less than an inch) from the transformer surface. The curved panel can also cancel higher order harmonics. This results in fewer actuators since the active panel can now take the place of piezoceramics on the tank. For this case, a microphone location external to the active panel also may be required.
Using the actuators discussed above, an active control scheme was developed for the transformer shown in Figure 2. Active panels were mounted on the tank over acoustic "hotspots" for 120 Hz noise. The active panels also were used to cancel any 240 Hz sources for which they coincidentally happened to be properly located. The remaining 240 Hz noise sources were canceled using piezoceramics attached directly on the tank. The actuator placement for the east and north sides of the tank is shown in Figures 17 and 18.
Piezofilm can be used instead of microphones or accelerometers to sense far-field noise (with appropriate signal filtering). Alternately, a pair of microphones (or an accelerometer plus a microphone) can be used to sense intensity (with appropriate signal filtering) as the error signal to be zeroed rather than sound pressure or tank acceleration.
Still another view of a transformer tank 1 is shown in Figure 19. Here the transformer is mounted on supports which result in the bottom of the transformer tank being an acoustic source (in addition to the top being a potential acoustic source). Figure 19 shows piezoceramics 9 being attached to the top, bottom, and bottom-supports of the tank 1, resulting in the top, bottom and bottom-supports becoming part of the active enclosure. Active panels 6 are also shown at the top and bottom of the transformer 1. Also shown in Figure 19 is a radiator bank 20. If the radiator bank is an acoustic source, piezoceramics with integral sensors 9 can be attached to control the fin vibration. Alternately, inertial shakers such as 21 attached to the radiator fin can be used to control vibration. In addition, these piezoceramics or shakers on the fins can be used to drive the radiator fins as loudspeakers, with external microphones or intensity probes used as error sensors.
Operation of the "Global Quieting System for Stationary Induction Apparatus" is as follows as illustrated in Figure 20. This particular control arrangement embodies a multiple-interactive, self-adaptive controller as discussed by Tretter (U.S. Patent No. 5,091,953 incorporated by reference herein). For this example, the controller is "personal computer" (PC) based. This controller, built by Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. allows up to 64 inputs and up to 32 outputs. The inputs and outputs are fully coupled. Operation is such that the line voltage from any local 120 volt outlet is stepped down to about 1 volt using transformer 23 and sent to a processor board 25 in the PC based controller. This reference signal, 24 is related to the frequency content of the noise to be canceled. The reference signal 24 is also highly coherent with the output of the microphones (or other) error sensors.
The sound pressure level adjacent to the tank is measured by the microphones 10. The microphones convert the sound pressure to voltage signals which are routed to junction box 32 adjacent to the transformer. The error sensor signals are then routed by trunk cable to input filters 36 which are located in the control building in the substation yard. The filtered error-sensor signals are then sampled with Analog-to-Digital converters, 37 and sent to the processor board, 25. The digital error-sensor signals are then used in conjunction with the reference signal 24 and a filtered-X update equation in the processor board 25 in order to adapt or change the coefficients of adaptive digital filters in 25 and generate output signals which minimize the error-sensors as far as possible. The digital output signals from the processor board 25 are sent to Digital-to-Analog converters 27. The analog output signals are amplified by amplifiers 29 (powered by power supplies 30) and are routed by trunk cable from the substation building to the junction boxes 31 at the transformer. The amplified output signal is next routed to the active panels 6 and actuators 9 on the tank. The actuators 9 on the tank thereby cancel acoustically-radiating modes on the tank which are excited by the second harmonic of the excitation frequency (240 Hz). The active panels 6 on the tank thereby cancel noise radiated by acoustically-radiating modes on the tank which are excited by the fundamental excitation frequency (120 Hz). To decrease the number of actuators and control channels, the active panels 6 on the tank may also cancel noise radiated by modes on the tank which are excited by the second harmonic of the excitation frequency. The error sensors (shown as microphones 10 in Figure 20) must be positioned near the transformer in a manner such that there is a large global reduction in the far-field. The PC based controller includes a modem (38) to allow remote communication and operation of the controller.
Note that for this system to work properly, terms in the transfer function matrix at 120 Hz typically must be zeroed for the piezoceramics on the tank, otherwise the signals to these actuators will include a 120 Hz component which will soon clip (due to the low control authority of piezoceramics on the tank at 120 Hz).
Large global reductions in far-field transformer noise were measured when the system described above was installed on the transformer, the tank for which is shown in Figure 2. For example, reductions of 15 dBA were measured for the first and second harmonics. Figure 21 shows the control-off/control-on performance of the system by transformer side for the 120 Hz tone. Figure 22 shows the control-off/control-on performance of the system by transformer side for the 240 Hz tone. These measurements were made 10 meters from the transformer using a Bruel & Kjaer sound level meter with a one-third octave band filter. These measurements of sound reduction were limited by the background noise level in the vicinity of the sound level meter. Greater reductions were measured with lower background levels. For example, reductions of up to 28 dBA were measured for the first harmonic with low background noise-levels as would occur in residential areas at night or in the early morning. Note that the performance of the quieting system does not change with the background noise, because there is ample single-to-noise with the error microphones close to the transformer tank. It is only the perceived reduction measured by the sound level meter which varies with the background noise level.
The power consumed by the active control system is minimal. The most power measured for an actuator is 5 watts. Typical power consumption is 1 watt per actuator. Thus even for 50 actuators, total power consumption would be much less than 1 kilowatt. Thus power consumption by the system is not a problem.
Note for the active-control setup, all actuators and sensors are either on or immediately adjacent to the transformer. Thus there are no actuators or sensors in the yard where they are susceptible to damage or interfere with maintenance or repair at the substation.
Older existing transformers are particularly noisy. Substations in residential areas with these transformers installed typically do not meet current laws for property-line noise limits, and are often a source of complaints for utilities. There is often enough land area in these substations that newer, lower noise transformers would meet property-line noise limits. However, the older transformers may have decades of useful life remaining. Replacing the transformers strictly to lower noise is very expensive. Building passive enclosures around the noisy transformers is nearly as expensive. However, installation of the invention described herein allows transformer noise to be reduced to much lower levels at a fraction of the cost of transformer replacement or building a passive enclosure.
There are two types of losses in a transformer: winding losses and core losses. Most of the losses are in the windings, and these are easily reduced by adding winding material, with little increase to the overall size and weight of the transformer. However, the primary means available to the manufacturer to decrease noise is to decrease the electro-magnetic flux density in the core (i.e., increase the core material). This results in substantial increase to the size and weight of the transformer. So the manufacturer decreases losses while decreasing noise by adding core material, with substantial increases in the size, weight and cost of the transformer. If noise were not a concern, the transformers could be built smaller, lighter, and with low losses (i.e., lower cost). Lower size and weight also mean easier shipping and a smaller foundation, which translates to lower cost.
High noise levels from transformers often result in utilities locating substations in industrial areas, near highways, or other areas where transformer noise is less of a nuisance. Utilities prefer to locate transformers close to the end-user in order to reduce their line losses. When utilities locate transformers in residential areas, they typically must buy large tracts of land (to use distance to reduce the effective noise from the transformer) and/or buy expensive low noise transformers, or buy regular transformers and surround them with expensive passive enclosures.
The invention claimed herein not only decreases transformer noise to background levels, but also holds promise to radically change how transformers and electrical distribution networks are designed and built, to allow more compact substations and more efficient networks, potentially lowering overall network cost. Other preferred features of the invention are as follows.
In the apparatus of the present invention, the sensor means may include first sensor means located approximately between said curved surface actuators and said tank means and second sensor means located on said piezoceramic actuators to thereby provide residual signals to said control means to enable it to attenuate both standing wave forms and localized areas of high vibration phenomena.
In the method of quieting stationary induction apparatus the step of measuring the areas of maximum deformation may include scanning the entire surface of said apparatus with a measuring means and creating a plot of that deformation thereby characterizing the apparatus as a sound source. The scan is preferably made with an accelerometer or a pressure sensor to measure intensity.

Claims

A stationary induction apparatus comprising: an induction device (1,2,3) which in operation produces hum having a fundamental frequency; a panel (13) mounted adjacent, but spaced from, and facing a surface portion (5) of the induction device; means (15) for vibrating the panel; a sensor (10) for providing a sensor signal; and means for driving the vibrating means in dependence upon the sensor signal; characterised in that: the panel is arranged to face a surface portion (5) of the induction device producing hum as a large standing wave at the fundamental frequency; the sensor is arranged for sensing sound pressure or sound intensity in the space between the panel and the hum-producing portion at a location part-way therebetween; and the driving means is arranged to drive the vibrating means at the fundamental frequency so as to counter the hum produced by the hum-producing portion.
An apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said hum-producing surface portion which the panel faces is generally at a position producing a peak in sound intensity at the fundamental frequency.
An apparatus as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the panel is curved.
An apparatus as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the panel is tuned so that in one mode of vibration thereof the resonant frequency thereof is generally equal to the fundamental hum frequency.
An apparatus as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the panel is tuned so that in another mode of vibration thereof the resonant frequency thereof is generally equal to a harmonic frequency of the hum.
An apparatus as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the panel is one of a plurality of such panels each for a respective such hum-producing surface portion of the induction device, each panel being associated with a respective such vibrating means and a respective such sensor.
An apparatus as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein: the hum produced by the induction device has at least one harmonic; the apparatus further comprises an actuator (9) mounted on a surface portion of the induction device generally at a position producing a peak in sound intensity at the frequency of the harmonic, and a sensor (12) mounted on the actuator for sensing vibration of the actuator and producing a vibration signal; and the driving means is operable to drive the actuator at the harmonic frequency in dependence upon the vibration signal so as to reduce the hum at the harmonic frequency.
An apparatus as claimed in claim 7, wherein the actuator is one of a plurality of such actuators each for a respective such harmonic hum-producing portion.
An apparatus as claimed in claim 8, wherein the driving means is operable to drive at least two of the actuators in phase or in ante-phase with respect to one another.
An apparatus as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the, or at least one of the, vibrating means and/or the actuator, or at least one of the actuators, comprises a piezo-ceramic actuator (9,15).
An apparatus as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the induction device comprises a tank (1) containing an inductive element (2) immersed in a substantially incompressible fluid (3); the induction element has a core which, in operation, vibrates due to magnetostriction; and the panel faces an outer surface portion (5) of the tank.
A method of designing an apparatus as claimed in claim 2, comprising the steps of: operating the induction device without operating the driving means; detecting a surface portion of the induction device producing a peak in sound intensity at the fundamental frequency; and locating the panel so as to face the detected surface portion.
A method, optionally as claimed in claim 12, of designing an apparatus as claimed in claim 7, comprising the steps of: operating the induction device without operating the driving means; detecting a surface portion of the induction device producing a peak in sound intensity at the harmonic frequency; and mounting the actuator on the detected surface portion.