Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

EP0189648B1 - Process for hydrocracking and catalytic dewaxing - Google Patents

Process for hydrocracking and catalytic dewaxing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0189648B1
EP0189648B1 EP85308595A EP85308595A EP0189648B1 EP 0189648 B1 EP0189648 B1 EP 0189648B1 EP 85308595 A EP85308595 A EP 85308595A EP 85308595 A EP85308595 A EP 85308595A EP 0189648 B1 EP0189648 B1 EP 0189648B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
stream
hydrocracking
heavy
dewaxing
boiling range
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP85308595A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0189648A1 (en
Inventor
Michael James Dolan
Karlton James Hickey, Jr.
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ExxonMobil Oil Corp
Original Assignee
Mobil Oil Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mobil Oil Corp filed Critical Mobil Oil Corp
Priority to AT85308595T priority Critical patent/ATE45177T1/en
Publication of EP0189648A1 publication Critical patent/EP0189648A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0189648B1 publication Critical patent/EP0189648B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G65/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only
    • C10G65/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only
    • C10G65/12Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including cracking steps and other hydrotreatment steps

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a hydrocarbon conversion process for the increased production of fuels in a refinery by combining hydrocracking and catalytic dewaxing steps, and more particularly, to a process to increase jet fuel, distillate or low pour heavy fuel oil yields.
  • catalytic hydrodewaxing in which gas oil is contacted with hydrogen and a shape-selective catalyst to selectively crack or hydrocrack the paraffinic molecules in the gas oil.
  • the catalysts were those cracking zeolite catalysts which had pore openings that would admit and crack only normal paraffins and exclude all other gas oil components, for example, erionite-type zeolites.
  • U.S. Patent Re. 28,398 describes an improvement to such a process by substituting a ZSM-5-type zeolite for the previously used erionite-type cracking zeolite catalysts.
  • the product of hydrodewaxing gas oil may be suitably fractionated to produce high yields of dewaxed gas oil boiling in the same range as the feed, some naphtha and some light (C 4- )hydrocarbons.
  • Catalytic dewaxing with a ZSM-5-type zeolite may be employed to improve the quality of a variety of feedstocks.
  • U.S. Patent Re. 28 398 describes in addition to gas oil other useful feedstocks including crude oil, full range dehydrated shale oil and lube oil stocks.
  • U.S. Patents 3 893 906 and 3 894 939 teach that a mixture of gas oil and aromatic naphtha yield a lower pour point gas oil and a higher octane gasoline when subjected to such catalytic hydrodewaxing.
  • U.S. Patent 3 989 617 describes an improved process for catalytically treating lubricating oil base stocks with ZSM-5-type zeolites.
  • U.S. Patents 3 755 145, 3 852 189, 3 894 938 and 3 956 102 describe other improvements in this process when used alone or in combination with other processes.
  • the desired low pour point fuel oil is recovered as the bottoms with the tower overhead of about 400 ° F-(204.5 ° C-) hydrocarbons comprising C 4 and lighter gaseous products plus hydrocarbons in the gasoline boiling range.
  • That combination process is practiced in two complete processing units: the catalytic cracker with all its usual attendant equipment including a fractionator, and a catalytic hydrodewaxer with its usual attendant equipment, including a fractionator.
  • these units may be operated in combination or separately.
  • U.S. Patent 4 332 670 describes a process in which the fractionating and stripping equipment of a middle distillate catalytic dewaxing unit may be eliminated by integrating the catalytic dewaxing unit with a catalytic cracking unit.
  • U. S. Patent 4,283,271 describes another combination to upgrade lubricating oils comprising a combination process in which a hydrocarbon feed sequentially passes through a hydrocracking zone, a catalytic dewaxing zone, and a hydrotreating zone, all at high pressure. Hydrocracked product is separated from recycle hydrogen prior to dewaxing.
  • U. S. Patents 4,347,121 and 4,325,805 describe other aspects of the combination process to produce lubricating oils by combining dewaxing and hydrocracking.
  • non-hydrocracked heavy gas oil may be sold as fuel oil, sent to a coker to make gasoline, sent to a hydrocracker, sent to a fluid catalytic cracking unit or sent to thermofor catalytic cracking unit.
  • a heavy gas oil stream is hydrocracked, the resultant hydrocracked product may be unstable in the presence of air thus requiring some stabilization process such as hydrofinishing.
  • Another disadvantage of hydrocracked heavy gas oil is that hydrocracking results in a high pour point hydrocracked product. Thus, if the hydrocracked product is distilled into its different cuts, the products tend to have high pour points thus reducing the amounts of useful products and reducing the selectivity to determine which products will be obtained.
  • the present invention is based on the observation that the selectivity of products from a heavy gas oil feedstock can be increased by combining hydrocracking and catalytic dewaxing.
  • Hydrocracking is a process to convert a feedstock such as heavy fuel oil into naphtha, kerosene and distillate and remove heteroatoms such as oxygen, nitrogen or sulfur.
  • a heavy fuel oil product may be obtained if the hydrocracker effluent stream is not recycled to produce lighter products.
  • the Mobil distillate dewaxing (MDDW) process allows the refiner to improve specified product fluidity properties (freeze point, pour point, cloud point and CFPP (cold filter plugging point)) of a jet fuel, distillate or heavy fuel oil.
  • CFFP is a test procedure in which oil is put through filter paper and the temperature at which it plugs is measured. Usually, the CFFP temperature is between the cloud and pour points.
  • a heavy gas oil feedstock is hydrocracked to yield a hydrocracked product which is distilled to produce a lighter boiling range stream and a relatively heavier boiling range stream.
  • the lighter boiling range stream is the normal refinery product stream.
  • the process of the invention comprises selectively increasing the yield of a hydrocarbon product from a heavy gas oil hydrocarbon feedstock by:
  • the process may employ any dewaxing catalyst, such as one comprising a large pore or medium pore zeolite.
  • the most suitable catalyst is determined by feedstock characteristics and operating conditions.
  • the process may be operated to selectively increase the yield of either jet fuel, distillate or heavy fuel oil.
  • the process may catalytically dewax a feedstock, then hydrocrack, and subsequently distill the dewaxed feedstock to desired products.
  • the process may include sequential hydrocracking, dewaxing, subsequent hydrocracking and distillation to produce the desired products.
  • the dewaxing effluent can be hydrotreated to remove sulfur and saturate aromatics and then blended with a normal product stream.
  • the hydrocracking step may be distinguished from a hydrotreating step by the amount of hydrogen consumed.
  • the hydrocracking step typically consuming about 1000 to about 2000 SCF/bbl (178 to 356 m3/m 3 ) while the hydrotreating step consumes only about 100 to about 200 SCF/bbl (17.8 to 35.6 m 3 /m 3 ).
  • the process In addition to selectively increasing the yields of jet fuel, distillate or heavy fuel oil, the process also increases the production of high octane MDDW gasoline by-product, increases the production of C 3 /C 4 olefinic by-product streams from MDDW for possible use in alkylation or petrochemical processes, and increases the BTU/gallon content in both the jet fuel and distillate fuels which may increase product value.
  • An advantage of the process in which catalytic dewaxing precedes hydrocracking is that it may allow use of a smaller hydrocracking unit.
  • the advantage of the process in which hydrocracking precedes catalytic dewaxing is that the hydrocracking reduces the levels of nitrogen in the feedstock so the feedstock is relatively easy to dewax, and thus results in very long dewaxing cycles.
  • Fig. 1 shows a hydrocracking/catalytic dewaxing flow scheme arrangement for selectively producing jet fuel.
  • a heavy gas oil stream passes through conduit 10 to a hydrocracking unit 20 to produce a hydrocracked product 22.
  • the heavy gas oil comes from a vacuum distillation tower (not shown).
  • the hydrocracking unit 20 operates at a space velocity of 0.25 to 3 Liquid Hourly Space Velocity (LHSV), a temperature of 500 ° to 850 ° F (260 ° to 455 ° C), a hydrogen partial pressure of 500 to 3000 psig (35.5 to 208 bar) and a hydrogen feed rate of 500 to 20,000 SCF/bbl (89 to 3560 m3/m3) of the heavy gas oil feedstock in conduit 10.
  • Liquid Hourly Space Velocity is a measure of unit volume per hour of reactant per unit volume of catalyst in a reactor.
  • the hydrocracking unit 20 operates at a space velocity of 0.5 to 2 LHSV, a temperature of 650 ° to 800°F (343° to 427 ° C), a hydrogen partial pressure of 1500 to 2500 psig (104.5 to 173.5 bar) and a hydrogen feed rate of 2000 to 10,000 SCF/bbl (356 to 1780 m 3 /m 3 ) of the heavy gas oil feedstock in conduit 10.
  • the hydrocracked product 22 is distilled by a distillation unit 30 to produce a naphtha stream 32, a jet fuel stream 34, a heavy kerosene stream 36, a distillate stream 38 and a heavy fuel oil stream 39.
  • the distillation unit 30 is preferably an atmospheric distillation unit.
  • the boiling point of the hydrocracked jet fuel is cut by unit 30 to meet a desired fluidity characteristic, namely the refinery jet fuel freeze point specification.
  • the boiling point of a virgin jet fuel stream 72 may also be cut by a fractionator (not shown) to meet the refinery jet fuel freeze point specification.
  • Boiling points are related to freeze point, in that for a given stream the higher boiling point components have higher freeze points than the lower boiling point components. Cut points can be adjusted by adjusting distillation parameters, such as the temperature or pressure at which distillation unit 40 operates, or by adjusting other distillation parameters, as known in the art.
  • the desired fluidity characteristic comprises a freeze point from -40 ° to -58 ° F (-40 ° to - 50 ° C).
  • the jet fuel stream 34 and virgin jet fuel stream 72 are cut to comprise hydrocarbons with a boiling point (b.p.) range from 380 ° to 450 ° F (195 ° to 230 ° C).
  • the naphtha stream typically comprises hydrocarbons boiling from 120 ° to 380°F (50° to 195 ° C).
  • Lighter components (120 ° F-) may be in naphtha stream 32, or preferably form a light product stream (not shown) from the distillation unit 30.
  • the heavy kerosene stream 36 and a virgin heavy kerosene stream 74 have boiling points adjacent that of the jet fuel streams 34, 72.
  • boiling points of the heavy kerosene streams 36, 74 are between 450 ° and 550 ° F (230 ° to 288 ° C).
  • the actual cut point of the heavy kerosene streams 36, 74 is determined to be a cut point where the next jet fuel specification, such as distillation boiling points, or specific gravity become limiting.
  • the distillate stream 38, produced by distillation unit 30, preferably has hydrocarbons with a boiling point ranging from 550 ° to 650 ° F (288 ° to 345 ° C).
  • the heavy fuel oil stream 39, produced by distillation unit 30, preferably comprises hydrocarbons having a boiling point range of 650 ° F + (345 ° C).
  • actual cut points of the distillate stream 38 are determined to meet the desired fluidity characteristics of pour point or cloud point specifications required by the refinery, as discussed below. Boiling points are related to pour point or cloud point, in that for a given stream the higher boiling point components have higher pour points or cloud points than the lower boiling point components. Cut points may be adjusted by adjusting distillation parameters, as outlined above.
  • a portion of the heavy fuel oil stream 39 may be recycled through conduit 24 to the hydrocracking unit 20. Conduit 24 and conduit 10 are attached so the recycled heavy fuel oil may combine with the heavy gas oil prior to feeding into the hydrocracking unit 20.
  • Both heavy kerosene streams 36, 74 may be combined and then catalytically dewaxed by catalytic dewaxing unit 50 to lower their freeze point and produce low freeze heavy kerosene stream 54. It is desired that the freeze point of stream 54 range between -40 ° to -58 ° F (-40 ° to -50°C).
  • the dewaxing unit 50 operates at a space velocity of 0.5 to 10 LHSV, a temperature of 400 ° to 850 ° F (205 ° to 455 ° C), a hydrogen partial pressure of 500 to 2500 psig (35.5 to 173.5 bar) and a hydrogen feed rate of 500 to 10,000 SCF/bbi (89 to 1780 m 3 /m 3 ) of liquid feed, namely streams 36, 74 in this embodiment.
  • the dewaxing unit 50 operates at a space velocity of 0.5 to 5 LHSV, a temperature of 475 ° to 800 ° F (246 ° to 427 ° C), a hydrogen partial pressure of 50 to 1500 psig (4.5 to 104.5 bar) and a hydrogen feed rate of 500 to 3000 SCF/bbi (89 to 534 m3/m3) of liquid feed, namely streams 36, 74 in this embodiment.
  • the low freeze heavy kerosene stream 54 and the virgin jet fuel stream 72 may be hydrotreated (not shown) to remove sulfur and saturate aromatics and then be blended into the refinery jet fuel pool stream 70.
  • the low freeze point heavy kerosene stream 54 may pass into a separation means (not shown) to form a high octane MDDW gasoline by-product stream, comprising Cs to 380 ° F (193 ° C) b.p. hydrocarbones, a C3/C4 olefinic by-product stream, and a heavier hydrocarbon stream comprising 380 ° to 550 ° F (193 to 288 ° C) b.p. hydrocarbons.
  • a pool generally consists of storage facilities for intermediate or final products.
  • the advantages of the embodiment of Fig. 1 include increased production of jet fuel having a low freeze point. However, there are also other advantages.
  • the catalytic dewaxing unit 50 using shape selective catalysts, such as a ZSM-5 type zeolite-containing catalyst, cracks the waxy components particularly the n-paraffins into lighter products, such as paraffins, olefins and aromatics, which remain in the jet fuel boiling range. These lighter products also include C 3 /C 4 olefinic streams which may be used in alkylation or petrochemical processes. These light olefins may be recovered from the low pour heavy distillate stream 52 by separation means (not shown), such as flash drums or a distillation unit.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates a process of the invention for selectively increasing distillate yields in a manner similar to the embodiment of Fig. 1 which increases jet fuel yields.
  • heavy gas oil passes through a conduit 10 to a hydrocracking unit 20 operating at the conditions outlined for the embodiment of Fig. 1, to produce a hydrocracked product stream 22.
  • the hydrocracked product stream 22 is separated by a distillation unit 40 to form a naphtha stream 42, a jet fuel stream 44, a distillate stream 46, a heavy distillate stream 48, and a heavy fuel oil stream 49.
  • Unit 40 preferably operates as an atmospheric distillation unit.
  • a portion of the heavy fuel oil stream 49 may recycle through conduit 24 to the hydrocracking unit 20.
  • the naphtha stream 42 comprises hydrocarbons with a boiling point (b.p.) ranging from 120 ° to 380 ° F (50 ° to 195°C), while lighter components (120 ° -F) may be contained in the naphtha stream 42 or form a separate light product stream (not shown) from the distillation unit 40.
  • the jet fuel stream 44 is optional and comprises hydrocarbons having a boiling point ranging from 380 ° to 450 ° F (195 ° to 230 ° C).
  • the distillate stream 46 comprises hydrocarbons ranging from 450° to 650°F (230 ° to 345 ° C).
  • the distillate stream 46 preferably comprises 380 ° to 650 ° F b.p. hydrocarbons (195° to 345 ° C).
  • a virgin distillate stream 64 may also be cut by a fractionator (not shown) to meet pour point (cloud point) specifications and comprise hydrocarbons boiling from 450 ° to 650 ° F (230 ° to 345 ° C), or preferably 380 ° to 650 ° F b.p. (195 ° to 345 ° C).
  • the virgin and hydrocracked distillate streams 64, 46 are both cut to suitable boiling points by the fractionator (not shown) and unit 40, respectively, to meet the refinery's desired specifications for pour point and cloud point.
  • Boiling points are related to pour point or cloud point, in that for a given stream the higher boiling point components have higher pour points or cloud points than the lower boiling point components. Cut points may be adjusted by adjusting distillation parameters, as outlined above.
  • the desired fluidity specifications of pour point range from -10° to 25 ° F (-23 ° to -4 ° C), while the desired cloud point ranges from 0 ° to 35 ° F (-17 ° to 2 ° C).
  • the heavy fuel oil stream 49 comprises hydrocarbons with a boiling range of 750 ° F+ (418 ° C).
  • a hydrocracked heavy distillate stream 48 is also produced by distillation unit 40 and a virgin heavy distillate stream 62 is produced to meet distillation specifications by a fractionator (not shown). These streams 48, 62 have boiling point ranges adjacent that of the distillate streams 46, 64 and are distilled to a cut point where the next distillate specification becomes limiting, such as boiling point or specific gravity, preferably the streams 48, 62 comprise 650 ° to 750 ° F b.p. (345 ° to 418 ° C) hydrocarbons. Both heavy distillate streams 48, 62 are then combined and catalytically dewaxed by catalytic dewaxing unit 80, at conditions disclosed above, to form a low pour point heavy distillate stream 52.
  • stream 52 has a desired fluidity specification, namely a pour point ranging from -10 ° to 25 ° F (-23 ° to -4 ° C) and a cloud point ranging from 0 ° to 35 ° F (-17 ° to 2 ° C).
  • stream 52 may be hydrotreated (not shown) to remove sulfur and to saturate aromatics, and then blended with virgin distillate stream 64 and hydrotreated distillate stream 46 into the refinery distillate pool 82.
  • a pool generally consists of storage facilities for intermediate or final products.
  • Fig. 3 shows another embodiment of the invention in which yields of heavy fuel oil having a low pour point are increased.
  • the heavy gas oil passes through a conduit 10 into a hydrocracking unit 20 to produce a hydrocracked product 22.
  • the unit 20 operates as above.
  • the hydrocracked product stream 22 is separated by distillation unit 60 into a naphtha stream 92, a jet fuel stream 94, a distillate stream 96 and a heavy fuel oil stream 98.
  • Unit 60 is preferably an atmospheric distillation apparatus.
  • a portion of the heavy fuel oil stream 98 may be recycled through recycle conduit 24 to the hydrocracking unit 20.
  • the naphtha stream 92 comprises hydrocarbons with a boiling point ranging from 120 ° to 380°F (50 ° to 195°C).
  • the jet fuel stream 94 is optional and comprises hydrocarbons ranging from 380° to 450°F b.p. (195° to 230 ° C).
  • the distillate stream 96 comprises hydrocarbons ranging from 450 ° to 650 ° F (230 ° to 345°C). If the jet fuel stream 94 is not included, the distillate stream 96 comprises 380° to 650° (195° to 345 ° C).
  • the heavy fuel oil stream comprises hydrocarbons with a boiling point ranging from 650 ° F + (345 ° C + ).
  • the heavy fuel oil stream 98 is catalytically dewaxed by catalytic dewaxing unit 90 to produce a dewaxed heavy fuel oil stream 56.
  • the catalytic dewaxing unit 90 operates at the dewaxing conditions outlined above.
  • the dewaxed heavy fuel oil stream 56 has a desired fluidity specification, namely a pour point less than 100 ° F, and preferably ranging from -10 ° to 70 ° F.
  • the desired pour point is determined by intended use of the product and the season during which the product is used. For example, lower pour points are more necessary in winter than in summer.
  • the third embodiment is particularly useful to produce a specialty low pour point (less than 100 ° F) (38°C) heavy fuel oil.
  • Fig. 4 illustrates a scheme in which dewaxing of a heavy gas oil is followed by hydrocracking.
  • heavy gas oil passes through a conduit 10, which is attached to a catalytic dewaxing unit 110, to produce a dewaxed heavy gas oil stream 112.
  • Stream 112 is then dewaxed by a post-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 120 to produce a hydrocracked product stream 122.
  • Both the catalytic dewaxing unit 110 and the post-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 120 operate at the conditions outlined for the hydrocracking unit 20 above.
  • the hydrocracked product stream 122 passes into a distillation unit 130 where it is separated to form a naphtha stream 132, a jet fuel stream 134, a distillate stream 136 and a heavy fuel oil stream 138. This produces a high yield of low freeze jet fuel and low pour point distillate.
  • the naphtha stream will include hydrocarbons having boiling points (b.p.) ranging from 120 ° to 380 ° F (50 ° to 195 ° C), jet fuel ranging from 380 ° to 450 ° F (195 ° to 230 ° C), distillate ranging from 450 ° to 650 ° F (230 ° to 345 ° C), and heavy fuel oil ranging from 650°Ff (345 ° C + ).
  • hydrocarbons having boiling points b.p.
  • jet fuel ranging from 380 ° to 450 ° F (195 ° to 230 ° C)
  • distillate ranging from 450 ° to 650 ° F (230 ° to 345 ° C)
  • heavy fuel oil ranging from 650°Ff (345 ° C + ).
  • the jet fuel stream 134 will have a freeze point ranging from -40° to -58°F (-40° to -50°C) and the distillate stream 136 and heavy fuel oil stream 138 will have pour points ranging from -10 ° to 25 ° F (-23° to -4 ° C).
  • cut points and required product specifications may be changed to accommodate refinery customers. Cut points may be adjusted by adjusting distillation parameters, as outlined above. For example, the distillate b.p. range may be extended during the winter to accommodate increased demand for distillate fuels. Other product specifications, such as pour point or freeze point, may be adjusted by adjusting cut point of the product or adjusting operating conditions, such as temperature or pressure, in the catalytic dewaxing unit or hydrocracking unit.
  • FIG. 5 Another embodiment of the invention is shown by Fig. 5, which adds a pre-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 100 to the embodiment of Fig. 4.
  • Unit 100 operates in the same range of conditions outlined above for the hydrocracking unit 20. Heavy gas oil is fed through a conduit 10 to the pre-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 100 to increase cycle length above that obtainable by the apparatus for the method of Fig. 4.
  • the pre-dewaxing unit 100 produces a pre-dewaxing hydrocrackate which passes through conduit 102 to the catalytic dewaxing unit 110.
  • Dewaxing by the pre-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 100 removes the paraffins from the catalytic dewaxing effluent stream 112, which otherwise feed the post-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 120.
  • the hydrocracking units 100, 120 and dewaxing unit 110 operate at conditions as described above. Removal of the paraffins from pre-dewaxing hydrocrackate stream 102 may result in improved post-dewaxing hydrocracking catalyst performance because paraffins are the most difficult molecules to hydrocrack. After post-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 120, a high yield of low freeze point jet fuel and low pour point distillate will result because the wax molecules have been removed. MDDW catalyst performance is also enhanced because many of the catalyst poisons have been removed by the pre-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 100.
  • the system of Fig. 1 allows increased production of jet fuel and the system of Fig. 2 allows increased production of distillate fuel.
  • the systems of Figs. 1 and 2 allow higher BTU/gallon (kJ/m 3 ) content in the jet fuel and distillate fuels respectively, thus resulting in higher value products.
  • BTU's/gallon (kJ/m3) is higher in the jet fuel or distillate fuels, because the catalytic dewaxing allows denser hydrocarbons to be blended into the jet fuel or distillate fuel respectively.
  • the hydrocracking unit also enhances the operation of the catalytic dewaxing unit because hydrocracking removes materials, such as nitrogen, which are poisonous to catalytic dewaxing catalysts.
  • the system of Fig. 3 allows for enhanced production of a heavy fuel oil having a low pour point.
  • a virgin heavy fuel oil of the same boiling range would be difficult to dewax and would result in a very short dewaxing operating cycle.
  • the hydrocracked heavy fuel oil because of its low levels of nitrogen is a relatively easy stock to dewax and can result in very long dewaxing cycles.
  • the embodiments of Figs. 1-3 can result in production of high octane MDDW gasoline and C 3 /C 4 olefinic streams as by-products of the catalytic dewaxing unit.
  • the systems of Figs. 4 and 5 allow for the use of smaller hydrocracker reactors, possible reduction of hydrogen consumption in hydrocracking, production of high octane MDDW gasoline and C ⁇ /C 4 streams from MDDW, higher BTU/gallon (kJ/m3) content in both the jet fuel and distillate streams and increased yields of low freeze/pour point jet fuel and distillate.
  • the system of Fig. 4 allows for a simple processing scheme requiring relatively few unit operations, while the system of Fig. 5 allows for longer cycle lengths than from the system of Fig. 4 because materials which are poisonous to dewaxing catalysts are removed by the pre-dewaxing hydrocracking unit.
  • hydrocracking catalysts per se individually are not regarded as part of this invention, it is noted that a wide variety of hydrocracking catalysts are suitable for use in the process of the invention.
  • Such catalysts in general possess an acid function and a hydrogenation function, exemplified by a porous acidic oxide, such as a silica alumina or silica zirconia, associated with a nickel-tungsten or palladium or platinum, or cobalt-moly or nickel-moly component.
  • a Group VIII metal or a combination of a Group VI and a Group VIII metal, as the oxides or sulfides thereof, deposited on silica alumina or silica or zirconia may serve as hydrocracking catalyst.
  • the process is effective for improving the dewaxing performance of intermediate pore or large pore zeolites, which are described below, because the hydrocracking of the invention removes nitrogen compounds which are believed to inhibit the dewaxing activity of most dewaxing catalysts.
  • the catalysts employed in the dewaxing units described above may be the same type or different. However, they will possess shape-selective paraffin cracking ability. Catalysts that have shape-selective qualities include crystalline zeolites and crystalline silica alumina phosphates (SAPO). These materials may be bound in a variety of matrices, such as those containing silica alumina or silica and alumina alone.
  • SAPO crystalline silica alumina phosphates
  • the catalysts may contain up to 15% metals that are known to possess a hydrogenation ability.
  • the preferred hydrogenation components are the noble metals of Group VIII, especially platinum and palladium, but other noble metals, such as iridium, ruthenium or rhodium, may also be used.
  • Combinations of noble metals with non-noble metals such as nickel, rhenium, tungsten, chromium and molybdenum are of interest. Combinations of Group VIB and Group VIII are also of interest. Base metal hydrogenation components may also be used especially nickel, cobalt, molybdenum, tungsten, copper or zinc.
  • the metal may be incorporated into the catalyst by any suitable method, such as impregnation or exchange onto the zeolite.
  • the metal may be incorporated in the form of a cationic, anionic or a neutral complex, such as and cationic complexes of this type will be found convenient for exchanging metals onto a zeolite.
  • Anionic complexes are also useful for impregnating metals into the zeolites.
  • the zeolites useful for dewaxing are termed medium or intermediate pore zeolites and are characterized by en effective pore size of generally less than about 7 Angstroms (0.7 nm), and/or pore windows in a crystal formed by 10-membered rings.
  • the medium or intermediate pore zeolites are represented by those zeolites having the structure of ZSM-5, ZSM-11, ZSM-23, ZSM-35, ZSM-38, ZSM-48 and TMA (tetra methyl ammonium) Offretite.
  • intermediate pore size zeolite zeolites having the unique characteristic of being able to differentiate between large molecules and molecules containing quaternary carbon atoms on the one hand, and smaller molecules on the other hand.
  • the intermediate pore size materials have surprising catalytic selectivities by reason of their effective pore apertures, as well as highly desirable and surprising catalytic activity and stability, when compared to most of the larger pore size crystalline zeolites.
  • intermediate pore size an effective pore aperture probably in the range of about 5 to 6.5 Angstroms (0.5 to 0.65 nm) when the zeolite is in the H-form.
  • Zeolites having pore apertures in this range tend to have unique zeolite characteristics and to be particularly useful in dewaxing.
  • small pore size zeolites such as erionite and chabazite, they will allow hydrocarbons having some branching into the zeolite void spaces.
  • larger pore size zeolites such as the faujasites, they can differentiate between n-alkalines and slightly branched alkanes having, for example quaternary carbon atoms.
  • the effective pore size of zeolites can be measured using standard adsorption techniques and compounds of known minimum kinetic diameters.
  • the preferred effective pore size range is from about 5.3 to 6.2 Angstroms (0.53 to 0.62 nm). See Breck, Zeolite Molecular Sieves. 1974 (especially Chapter 8) and Anderson et al, J. Catalvsis 58, 114 (1979), both of which are incorporated by reference.
  • Intermediate pore size zeolites in the H-form will typically admit molecules having kinetic diameters of 5.0 to 6.5 Angstroms with little hindrance.
  • Examples of such compounds (and their kinetic diameters in Angstroms) (nm) are: n-hexane (4.3) (0.43), 3 methylpentane (5.5) (0.55), benzene (5.85) (0.585), and toluene (5.8) (0.58).
  • Compounds having kinetic diameters of about 6 to 6.5 (0.6 to 0.65 nm) Angstroms can be admitted into the pores, depending on the particular zeolite, but do not penetrate as quickly and, in some cases, are effectively excluded.
  • Compounds having kinetic diameters in the range of 6 to 6.5 Angstroms include: cyclohexane (6.0) (0.6 nm), 2,3 dimethylbutane (6.1) (0.61 nm), m-xylene (6.1), and 1,2,3,4 tetramethylbenzene (6.4) (0.64 nm).
  • cyclohexane 6.0
  • 2,3 dimethylbutane 6.1
  • m-xylene 6.1
  • 1,2,3,4 tetramethylbenzene 6.4
  • Generally compounds having kinetic diameters of greater than about 6.5 Angstroms do not penetrate the pore apertures, and thus are not absorbed into the interior of the zeolite lattice.
  • Examples of such larger compounds include: hexamethylbenzene (7.1), 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (7.5) (0.75 nm), and tributylamine (8.1) (0.81 nm).
  • the acid activity of zeolite catalysts is conveniently defined by the alpha scale described in an article published in Journal of Catalysis, Vol. VI, pp. 278-287 (1966).
  • the zeolite catalyst is contacted with hexane under conditions prescribed in the publication, and the amount of hexane which is cracked is measured. From this measurement is computed an «alpha» value, which characterizes the catalyst for its cracking activity for hexane.
  • the entire article above referred to is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the alpha scale so described will be used herein to define activity levels for cracking n-hexane.
  • a catalyst with an alpha value of not greater than about 1.0, and preferably not greater than about 0.5 will be considered to have substantially no activity for cracking hexane.
  • zeolites useful for hydrodewaxing are termed large pore zeolites and have a pore size larger than the medium pore zeolites and sufficiently large to admit the vast majority of components normally found in a feedstock. These zeolites generally are stated to have a pore size in excess of 7.5 Angstroms (0.75 nm) and/or formed by 12-membered rings.
  • the large pore zeolites are represented by ZSM-4, ZSM-12, ZSM-20, Zeolie Beta, Mordenite, TEA (tetra ethyl ammonium) Mordenite, Dealu- minized Y, and Rare Earth Y.
  • the large pore component may include a low sodium Ultrastable Y molecular sieve (USY).
  • USY Ultrastable Y molecular sieve
  • the large pore zeolites have less hydrodewaxing effectiveness than the intermediate pore zeolites.
  • ZSM-4 is described in U.S. Patent 3 923 639.
  • ZSM-5 is described in U.S. Patents 3 702 886 and Re. 29 948.
  • ZSM-11 is described in U.S. Patent 3 709 976.
  • ZSM-12 is described in U.S. Patent 3 832 449.
  • ZSM-20 is described in U.S. Patent 3 972 983.
  • ZSM-23 is described in U.S. Patent 4 076 842.
  • ZSM-35 is described in U.S. Patent 4 016 245.
  • ZSM-38 is described in U.S. Patent 4 046 859.
  • ZSM-48 is described in U.S. Patent 4 397 827.
  • the catalysts preferred for use herein include crystalline alumina silicate zeolites having a silica-to- alumina ratio of at least 12, a Constraint Index of about 0.5 to 12 and acid cracking activity of about 160-200.
  • a suitable shape selective catalyst for a fixed bed reactor is an HZSM-5 zeolite with alumina binder in the form of cylindrical extrudates of about 1-5 millimeters.
  • HZSM-5 is a ZSM-5 type catalyst with only hydrogen on the active catalyst sites and no metals on these sites.
  • Other catalysts which may be used in one or more reactor stages include siliceous materials with pore size in the range of 5 to 9 Angstroms (0.5 to 0.9 nm). These include borosilicates, ferrosilicates and/or aluminosilicates, disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 4 414143 and 4 417 088.
  • Example 1 demonstrates the operability of a configuration as in Fig. 3 in which a hydrocracked heavy hydrocarbon stream is catalytically dewaxed.
  • the properties of the feed are listed in Table 1 and the feed represents stream 98, as in Fig. 3.
  • the dewaxing unit feed is taken from a moderate pressure (about 800 psig (56.2 bar) hydrogen partial pressure) hydrocracker product and comprises hydrocarbons having a boiling point from 650 ° (343 ° C) to about 1050°F (566 ° C).
  • the hydrocarbons were dewaxed over a fresh, steamed, 1/16 inch Ni-ZSM-5 catalyst containing about 1% nickel.
  • a test reactor was employed to represent catalytic dewaxing unit 90 of Fig.
  • the test reactor had an inside diameter of 7/8 inch (2.22 cm) and a 3/16 inch (0.48 cm) thermal well at its center and was operated isothermally.
  • the dewaxing reactor operated for 20 days at a hydrogen partial pressure of 400 psig (28.6 bar), a space velocity of 1.5 LHSV, a hydrogen treat rate of 2000 SCF H 2 /bbl (356 m3/m3) feed and a start-of-cycle temperature of 500 ° F (260 ° C) and a line out temperature of 550 ° F (288 ° C).
  • the line out temperature is the temperature at which catalysts can be run without substantial aging, for example, less than 5 ° F (2.8 ° C) per month.
  • Table 2 shows the product yields from the dewaxing reactor.
  • the dewaxed product is representative of stream 56 of Fig. 3.
  • Over 90% of the hydrocracked feed was converted to 330 ° F + (166°C + ) boiling point (b.p.) hydrocarbon product, hydrocarbons in the naphtha/gasoline boiling range of Cs-330°F b.p. and lighter hydrocarbons comprising Cs.
  • Table 1 lists the product properties of the gasoline range products and the 330 ° F + b.p. products.
  • Table 3 shows the product properties of the 330 ° F + b.p. product stream which has been separated into a 330 ° to 725 ° F (385 ° C) distillate stream and a 725 ° to 1050 ° F (566 ° C) b.p. dewaxed heavy fuel oil stream.
  • the results shown by Tables 1-3 indicate a heavy fuel oil product having a low pour point can be produced by hydrocracking a stream prior to dewaxing.
  • Example 2 demonstrates the results of dewaxing a virgin heavy gas oil having the properties listed in Table 4.
  • the virgin feed had boiling points comparable to those of the hydrocracked feed of Example 1.
  • the dewaxing was conducted in the same isothermal test reactor as in Example 1, having an inside diameter of 7/8 inch and 3/16 inch thermal well at its center.
  • the test reactor contained 50 cc of catalyst.
  • the catalyst was the same type as in Example 1, namely, fresh, steamed, 1/16 inch (0.16 cm) Ni-ZSM-5 catalyst containing about 1 wt% nickel.
  • Dewaxing occurred at a hydrogen partial pressure of 400 psig, a space velocity of 1 LHSV, a hydrogen feed rate fo 2000 SCF H z /bbl feedstock, a start-of-cycle temperature of 500°F and end-of-run temperature of 760 ° F (404.5 ° C).
  • This test ran for 41 days to make a 20°F pour point product. Although the test was ended at 760 ° F, it is estimated that the test could have been run to an end-of-cycle temperature of 800 ° F after two months total operation.
  • Table 4 lists the product properties for the naphtha/gasoline range components containing Cs-330 ° F boiling point (b.p.) hydrocarbons and a heavier hydrocarbon stream containing 330°F + b.p. hydrocarbons.
  • the distillation data shown for the Cs-330°F b.p. gasoline product consists of estimated values. Table 4 shows that although a 20 ° F pour points heavier hydrocarbon product can be produced by dewaxing of a heavy hydrocarbon stream alone, this causes a high catalyst aging rate which results in only a two month cycle time. Comparing the results of Example 1 and Example 2 shows that hydrocracking a feed prior to dewaxing reduces aging rates. Thus, hydrocracking a heavy hydrocarbon feedstock prior to dewaxing results in a cycle time estimated to be two years, as opposed to dewaxing without prior hydrocracking, which results in a cycle time estimated to be two months.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Abstract

A method for selectively increasing production of jet fuel, distillate or heavy fuel oil in a fuels refinery involves combining hydrocracking and catalytic dewaxing.

Description

  • This invention relates to a hydrocarbon conversion process for the increased production of fuels in a refinery by combining hydrocracking and catalytic dewaxing steps, and more particularly, to a process to increase jet fuel, distillate or low pour heavy fuel oil yields.
  • The refining of petroleum crude oils to yield a variety of fuel products such as jet fuel, distillate and heavy fuel oil has been practiced for many years. Special uses for these products normally include a requirement that the freeze point or pour point may not exceed a certain maximum value. In some instances, it is necessary to subject these fuels to additional processing to reduce their pour points or their freeze points.
  • One such process is referred to as catalytic hydrodewaxing, in which gas oil is contacted with hydrogen and a shape-selective catalyst to selectively crack or hydrocrack the paraffinic molecules in the gas oil. Initially, the catalysts were those cracking zeolite catalysts which had pore openings that would admit and crack only normal paraffins and exclude all other gas oil components, for example, erionite-type zeolites. U.S. Patent Re. 28,398 describes an improvement to such a process by substituting a ZSM-5-type zeolite for the previously used erionite-type cracking zeolite catalysts. Using this addition, the normal paraffins and paraffins with slight branching, for example, those with a methyl side group, were also cracked so dewaxing was carried out to a greater extent. This permitted lowering of the gas oil pour point in a very efficient manner. The product of hydrodewaxing gas oil may be suitably fractionated to produce high yields of dewaxed gas oil boiling in the same range as the feed, some naphtha and some light (C4-)hydrocarbons.
  • Catalytic dewaxing with a ZSM-5-type zeolite may be employed to improve the quality of a variety of feedstocks. U.S. Patent Re. 28 398 describes in addition to gas oil other useful feedstocks including crude oil, full range dehydrated shale oil and lube oil stocks. U.S. Patents 3 893 906 and 3 894 939 teach that a mixture of gas oil and aromatic naphtha yield a lower pour point gas oil and a higher octane gasoline when subjected to such catalytic hydrodewaxing. U.S. Patent 3 989 617 describes an improved process for catalytically treating lubricating oil base stocks with ZSM-5-type zeolites. U.S. Patents 3 755 145, 3 852 189, 3 894 938 and 3 956 102 describe other improvements in this process when used alone or in combination with other processes.
  • One particularly effective combination process of catalytic cracking and catalytic dewaxing is described in U.S. Patent 3 891 540. The process is concerned with producing a light fuel oil with a low pour point, and involves catalytic cracking employing relatively mild conversion conditions. In the process, 45 volume percent of fresh gas oil and heavy cycle oil are cracked in one riser and intermediate cycle oil is cracked in a second riser. The light cycle oil recovered from the catalytic cracking fractionator is subjected to catalytic hydrodewaxing with a ZSM-5 type crystalline zeolite. The effluent from the hydrodewaxing reactor is condensed, the hydrogen recovered for recycle and the condensed effluent sent to the hydrodewaxing unit fractionator. Here the desired low pour point fuel oil is recovered as the bottoms with the tower overhead of about 400°F-(204.5°C-) hydrocarbons comprising C4 and lighter gaseous products plus hydrocarbons in the gasoline boiling range. That combination process is practiced in two complete processing units: the catalytic cracker with all its usual attendant equipment including a fractionator, and a catalytic hydrodewaxer with its usual attendant equipment, including a fractionator. Thus, these units may be operated in combination or separately.
  • U.S. Patent 4 332 670 describes a process in which the fractionating and stripping equipment of a middle distillate catalytic dewaxing unit may be eliminated by integrating the catalytic dewaxing unit with a catalytic cracking unit.
  • U. S. Patent 4,283,271 describes another combination to upgrade lubricating oils comprising a combination process in which a hydrocarbon feed sequentially passes through a hydrocracking zone, a catalytic dewaxing zone, and a hydrotreating zone, all at high pressure. Hydrocracked product is separated from recycle hydrogen prior to dewaxing. U. S. Patents 4,347,121 and 4,325,805 describe other aspects of the combination process to produce lubricating oils by combining dewaxing and hydrocracking.
  • At present, non-hydrocracked heavy gas oil may be sold as fuel oil, sent to a coker to make gasoline, sent to a hydrocracker, sent to a fluid catalytic cracking unit or sent to thermofor catalytic cracking unit. If a heavy gas oil stream is hydrocracked, the resultant hydrocracked product may be unstable in the presence of air thus requiring some stabilization process such as hydrofinishing. Another disadvantage of hydrocracked heavy gas oil is that hydrocracking results in a high pour point hydrocracked product. Thus, if the hydrocracked product is distilled into its different cuts, the products tend to have high pour points thus reducing the amounts of useful products and reducing the selectivity to determine which products will be obtained.
  • The present invention is based on the observation that the selectivity of products from a heavy gas oil feedstock can be increased by combining hydrocracking and catalytic dewaxing. Hydrocracking is a process to convert a feedstock such as heavy fuel oil into naphtha, kerosene and distillate and remove heteroatoms such as oxygen, nitrogen or sulfur. In some hydrocracking operations, a heavy fuel oil product may be obtained if the hydrocracker effluent stream is not recycled to produce lighter products.
  • The Mobil distillate dewaxing (MDDW) process allows the refiner to improve specified product fluidity properties (freeze point, pour point, cloud point and CFPP (cold filter plugging point)) of a jet fuel, distillate or heavy fuel oil. CFFP is a test procedure in which oil is put through filter paper and the temperature at which it plugs is measured. Usually, the CFFP temperature is between the cloud and pour points. In a typical application of the invention, a heavy gas oil feedstock is hydrocracked to yield a hydrocracked product which is distilled to produce a lighter boiling range stream and a relatively heavier boiling range stream. The lighter boiling range stream is the normal refinery product stream. By dewaxing the heavier boiling range stream, its fluid properties can be improved and its product value can be upgraded by blending it into the lower boiling point stream.
  • The process of the invention comprises selectively increasing the yield of a hydrocarbon product from a heavy gas oil hydrocarbon feedstock by:
    • hydrocracking the feedstock in a hydrocracking unit operating at a space velocity of 0.25 to 3 LHSV, a temperature of 260 to 455°C, a hydrogen partial pressure of 35.5 to 208 bar and a hydrogen feed rate of 89 to 3560 m3/m3 of said feedstock, thereby producing a hydrocracked product;
    • distilling the hydrocracking product to produce a lighter boiling range stream, which is a normal refinery product stream, and a heavier boiling range stream of fluidity properties inferior to those of said refinery product stream;
    • catalytically dewaxing said heavier boiling range stream at 0.5 to 10 LHSV, 204 to 454°C, 4.5 to 173 bar hydrogen partial pressure and 89 to 1780 m3/m3 hydrogen feed rate; and
    • blending the thus dewaxed heavier boiling range stream with said lighter boiling range stream.
  • More particularly the process of this invention comprises the steps of:
    • hydrocracking a heavy gas oil hydrocarbon feedstock at a space velocity of 0.5 to 2 LHSV, a temperature of 650 to 800°F (343 to 427°C), a hydrogen partial pressure of 1500 to 2500 psig (104.5 to 173.5 bar) and a hydrogen feed rate of 2000 to 10,000 SCF/bbl (356 to 1780 m3/m3) of the feedstock, thereby producing a hydrocracked product; distilling said hydrocracked product by atmospheric distillation to recover a heavy kerosene stream comprising 450° to 550°F b.p. (230° to 288°C) hydrocarbons and a jet fuel stream comprising 380° to 450°F b.p. (195° to 230°C) hydrocarbons and having a freeze point from - 40° to -58°F (-400 to -50°C);
    • catalytically dewaxing the heavy kerosene stream with a catalyst comprising a zeolite having the structure of ZSM-5 and a nickel hydrogenation component at a space velocity of 0.5 to 5 LHSV, temperature of 475° to 800°F (246° to 427°C), hydrogen partial pressure of 50 to 1500 psig (4.5 to 104.5 bar) and hydrogen feed rate of 500 to 3000 SCF/bbl (89 to 534 m3/m3) of the heavy kerosene stream, thereby forming a low freeze point heavy kerosene stream having a freeze point from -40° to -58°F (-40° to -50°C); and blending the jet fuel and low freeze point heavy kerosene stream.
  • The process may employ any dewaxing catalyst, such as one comprising a large pore or medium pore zeolite. The most suitable catalyst is determined by feedstock characteristics and operating conditions. The process may be operated to selectively increase the yield of either jet fuel, distillate or heavy fuel oil. The process may catalytically dewax a feedstock, then hydrocrack, and subsequently distill the dewaxed feedstock to desired products. in addition, the process may include sequential hydrocracking, dewaxing, subsequent hydrocracking and distillation to produce the desired products. After dewaxing, the dewaxing effluent can be hydrotreated to remove sulfur and saturate aromatics and then blended with a normal product stream. For the purposes of this invention, the hydrocracking step may be distinguished from a hydrotreating step by the amount of hydrogen consumed. The hydrocracking step typically consuming about 1000 to about 2000 SCF/bbl (178 to 356 m3/m3) while the hydrotreating step consumes only about 100 to about 200 SCF/bbl (17.8 to 35.6 m3/m3).
  • In addition to selectively increasing the yields of jet fuel, distillate or heavy fuel oil, the process also increases the production of high octane MDDW gasoline by-product, increases the production of C3/C4 olefinic by-product streams from MDDW for possible use in alkylation or petrochemical processes, and increases the BTU/gallon content in both the jet fuel and distillate fuels which may increase product value. An advantage of the process in which catalytic dewaxing precedes hydrocracking is that it may allow use of a smaller hydrocracking unit. The advantage of the process in which hydrocracking precedes catalytic dewaxing is that the hydrocracking reduces the levels of nitrogen in the feedstock so the feedstock is relatively easy to dewax, and thus results in very long dewaxing cycles.
    • Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a process of the invention to selectively increase jet fuel yield;
    • Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of a process of the invention to selectively increase distillate yield;
    • Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of a process to selectively increase heavy fuel oil yield;
    • Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of a process in which catalytic dewaxing precedes hydrocracking; and
    • Fig. 5 is a schematic diagram of a process of the invention with two-stage hydrocracking and catalytic dewaxing between the hydrocracking stages.
  • Referring to the drawings, Fig. 1 shows a hydrocracking/catalytic dewaxing flow scheme arrangement for selectively producing jet fuel. A heavy gas oil stream passes through conduit 10 to a hydrocracking unit 20 to produce a hydrocracked product 22. Typically, the heavy gas oil comes from a vacuum distillation tower (not shown). The hydrocracking unit 20 operates at a space velocity of 0.25 to 3 Liquid Hourly Space Velocity (LHSV), a temperature of 500° to 850°F (260° to 455°C), a hydrogen partial pressure of 500 to 3000 psig (35.5 to 208 bar) and a hydrogen feed rate of 500 to 20,000 SCF/bbl (89 to 3560 m3/m3) of the heavy gas oil feedstock in conduit 10. Liquid Hourly Space Velocity is a measure of unit volume per hour of reactant per unit volume of catalyst in a reactor. Preferably, the hydrocracking unit 20 operates at a space velocity of 0.5 to 2 LHSV, a temperature of 650° to 800°F (343° to 427°C), a hydrogen partial pressure of 1500 to 2500 psig (104.5 to 173.5 bar) and a hydrogen feed rate of 2000 to 10,000 SCF/bbl (356 to 1780 m3/m3) of the heavy gas oil feedstock in conduit 10.
  • The hydrocracked product 22 is distilled by a distillation unit 30 to produce a naphtha stream 32, a jet fuel stream 34, a heavy kerosene stream 36, a distillate stream 38 and a heavy fuel oil stream 39. The distillation unit 30 is preferably an atmospheric distillation unit. The boiling point of the hydrocracked jet fuel is cut by unit 30 to meet a desired fluidity characteristic, namely the refinery jet fuel freeze point specification. In addition, the boiling point of a virgin jet fuel stream 72 may also be cut by a fractionator (not shown) to meet the refinery jet fuel freeze point specification. Boiling points are related to freeze point, in that for a given stream the higher boiling point components have higher freeze points than the lower boiling point components. Cut points can be adjusted by adjusting distillation parameters, such as the temperature or pressure at which distillation unit 40 operates, or by adjusting other distillation parameters, as known in the art.
  • For jet fuel, the desired fluidity characteristic comprises a freeze point from -40° to -58°F (-40° to - 50°C). Typically, the jet fuel stream 34 and virgin jet fuel stream 72 are cut to comprise hydrocarbons with a boiling point (b.p.) range from 380° to 450°F (195° to 230°C). The naphtha stream typically comprises hydrocarbons boiling from 120° to 380°F (50° to 195°C). Lighter components (120°F-) may be in naphtha stream 32, or preferably form a light product stream (not shown) from the distillation unit 30. The heavy kerosene stream 36 and a virgin heavy kerosene stream 74 have boiling points adjacent that of the jet fuel streams 34, 72. Preferably, boiling points of the heavy kerosene streams 36, 74 are between 450° and 550°F (230° to 288°C). The actual cut point of the heavy kerosene streams 36, 74 is determined to be a cut point where the next jet fuel specification, such as distillation boiling points, or specific gravity become limiting.
  • The distillate stream 38, produced by distillation unit 30, preferably has hydrocarbons with a boiling point ranging from 550° to 650°F (288° to 345°C). The heavy fuel oil stream 39, produced by distillation unit 30, preferably comprises hydrocarbons having a boiling point range of 650°F+ (345°C). However, actual cut points of the distillate stream 38 are determined to meet the desired fluidity characteristics of pour point or cloud point specifications required by the refinery, as discussed below. Boiling points are related to pour point or cloud point, in that for a given stream the higher boiling point components have higher pour points or cloud points than the lower boiling point components. Cut points may be adjusted by adjusting distillation parameters, as outlined above. In addition, a portion of the heavy fuel oil stream 39 may be recycled through conduit 24 to the hydrocracking unit 20. Conduit 24 and conduit 10 are attached so the recycled heavy fuel oil may combine with the heavy gas oil prior to feeding into the hydrocracking unit 20.
  • Both heavy kerosene streams 36, 74 may be combined and then catalytically dewaxed by catalytic dewaxing unit 50 to lower their freeze point and produce low freeze heavy kerosene stream 54. It is desired that the freeze point of stream 54 range between -40° to -58°F (-40° to -50°C). The dewaxing unit 50 operates at a space velocity of 0.5 to 10 LHSV, a temperature of 400° to 850°F (205° to 455°C), a hydrogen partial pressure of 500 to 2500 psig (35.5 to 173.5 bar) and a hydrogen feed rate of 500 to 10,000 SCF/bbi (89 to 1780 m3/m3) of liquid feed, namely streams 36, 74 in this embodiment. Preferably, the dewaxing unit 50 operates at a space velocity of 0.5 to 5 LHSV, a temperature of 475° to 800°F (246° to 427°C), a hydrogen partial pressure of 50 to 1500 psig (4.5 to 104.5 bar) and a hydrogen feed rate of 500 to 3000 SCF/bbi (89 to 534 m3/m3) of liquid feed, namely streams 36, 74 in this embodiment.
  • After dewaxing the hydrotreated jet fuel stream 34, the low freeze heavy kerosene stream 54 and the virgin jet fuel stream 72 may be hydrotreated (not shown) to remove sulfur and saturate aromatics and then be blended into the refinery jet fuel pool stream 70. Also, the low freeze point heavy kerosene stream 54 may pass into a separation means (not shown) to form a high octane MDDW gasoline by-product stream, comprising Cs to 380°F (193°C) b.p. hydrocarbones, a C3/C4 olefinic by-product stream, and a heavier hydrocarbon stream comprising 380° to 550°F (193 to 288°C) b.p. hydrocarbons. These heavier hydrocarbons may be blended into the jet fuel pool 70. A pool generally consists of storage facilities for intermediate or final products.
  • The advantages of the embodiment of Fig. 1 include increased production of jet fuel having a low freeze point. However, there are also other advantages. The catalytic dewaxing unit 50, using shape selective catalysts, such as a ZSM-5 type zeolite-containing catalyst, cracks the waxy components particularly the n-paraffins into lighter products, such as paraffins, olefins and aromatics, which remain in the jet fuel boiling range. These lighter products also include C3/C4 olefinic streams which may be used in alkylation or petrochemical processes. These light olefins may be recovered from the low pour heavy distillate stream 52 by separation means (not shown), such as flash drums or a distillation unit. In addition, higher BTU/gallon (kJ/m3) content may result because the low freeze heavy kerosene stream 54 is heavier and has more BTU's/lb (kJ/kg) and is denser than the hydrocracked jet fuel stream 34, yet it meets the freeze point specifications.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates a process of the invention for selectively increasing distillate yields in a manner similar to the embodiment of Fig. 1 which increases jet fuel yields. As shown by Fig. 2, heavy gas oil passes through a conduit 10 to a hydrocracking unit 20 operating at the conditions outlined for the embodiment of Fig. 1, to produce a hydrocracked product stream 22. The hydrocracked product stream 22 is separated by a distillation unit 40 to form a naphtha stream 42, a jet fuel stream 44, a distillate stream 46, a heavy distillate stream 48, and a heavy fuel oil stream 49. Unit 40 preferably operates as an atmospheric distillation unit. A portion of the heavy fuel oil stream 49 may recycle through conduit 24 to the hydrocracking unit 20.
  • In the embodiment of Fig. 2, the naphtha stream 42 comprises hydrocarbons with a boiling point (b.p.) ranging from 120° to 380°F (50° to 195°C), while lighter components (120°-F) may be contained in the naphtha stream 42 or form a separate light product stream (not shown) from the distillation unit 40. The jet fuel stream 44 is optional and comprises hydrocarbons having a boiling point ranging from 380° to 450°F (195° to 230°C). The distillate stream 46 comprises hydrocarbons ranging from 450° to 650°F (230° to 345°C). If the jet fuel stream 44 is not produced, the distillate stream 46 preferably comprises 380° to 650°F b.p. hydrocarbons (195° to 345°C). A virgin distillate stream 64 may also be cut by a fractionator (not shown) to meet pour point (cloud point) specifications and comprise hydrocarbons boiling from 450° to 650°F (230° to 345°C), or preferably 380° to 650°F b.p. (195° to 345°C). However, the virgin and hydrocracked distillate streams 64, 46 are both cut to suitable boiling points by the fractionator (not shown) and unit 40, respectively, to meet the refinery's desired specifications for pour point and cloud point. Boiling points are related to pour point or cloud point, in that for a given stream the higher boiling point components have higher pour points or cloud points than the lower boiling point components. Cut points may be adjusted by adjusting distillation parameters, as outlined above. The desired fluidity specifications of pour point range from -10° to 25°F (-23° to -4°C), while the desired cloud point ranges from 0° to 35°F (-17° to 2°C). The heavy fuel oil stream 49 comprises hydrocarbons with a boiling range of 750°F+ (418°C).
  • A hydrocracked heavy distillate stream 48 is also produced by distillation unit 40 and a virgin heavy distillate stream 62 is produced to meet distillation specifications by a fractionator (not shown). These streams 48, 62 have boiling point ranges adjacent that of the distillate streams 46, 64 and are distilled to a cut point where the next distillate specification becomes limiting, such as boiling point or specific gravity, preferably the streams 48, 62 comprise 650° to 750°F b.p. (345° to 418°C) hydrocarbons. Both heavy distillate streams 48, 62 are then combined and catalytically dewaxed by catalytic dewaxing unit 80, at conditions disclosed above, to form a low pour point heavy distillate stream 52. Preferably, stream 52 has a desired fluidity specification, namely a pour point ranging from -10° to 25°F (-23° to -4°C) and a cloud point ranging from 0° to 35°F (-17° to 2°C). After dewaxing, stream 52 may be hydrotreated (not shown) to remove sulfur and to saturate aromatics, and then blended with virgin distillate stream 64 and hydrotreated distillate stream 46 into the refinery distillate pool 82. A pool generally consists of storage facilities for intermediate or final products.
  • Fig. 3 shows another embodiment of the invention in which yields of heavy fuel oil having a low pour point are increased. The heavy gas oil passes through a conduit 10 into a hydrocracking unit 20 to produce a hydrocracked product 22. The unit 20 operates as above. The hydrocracked product stream 22 is separated by distillation unit 60 into a naphtha stream 92, a jet fuel stream 94, a distillate stream 96 and a heavy fuel oil stream 98. Unit 60 is preferably an atmospheric distillation apparatus. A portion of the heavy fuel oil stream 98 may be recycled through recycle conduit 24 to the hydrocracking unit 20. The naphtha stream 92 comprises hydrocarbons with a boiling point ranging from 120° to 380°F (50° to 195°C). The jet fuel stream 94 is optional and comprises hydrocarbons ranging from 380° to 450°F b.p. (195° to 230°C). The distillate stream 96 comprises hydrocarbons ranging from 450° to 650°F (230° to 345°C). If the jet fuel stream 94 is not included, the distillate stream 96 comprises 380° to 650° (195° to 345°C). The heavy fuel oil stream comprises hydrocarbons with a boiling point ranging from 650°F+ (345°C+).
  • The heavy fuel oil stream 98 is catalytically dewaxed by catalytic dewaxing unit 90 to produce a dewaxed heavy fuel oil stream 56. The catalytic dewaxing unit 90 operates at the dewaxing conditions outlined above. The dewaxed heavy fuel oil stream 56 has a desired fluidity specification, namely a pour point less than 100°F, and preferably ranging from -10° to 70°F. The desired pour point is determined by intended use of the product and the season during which the product is used. For example, lower pour points are more necessary in winter than in summer. The third embodiment is particularly useful to produce a specialty low pour point (less than 100°F) (38°C) heavy fuel oil. In certain countries (e.g., Japan and Austria), there is a demand for a domestic low pour point heavy fuel oil which has no distillation end point specification. Part or all of the hydrocracked heavy fuel oil stream 22 can be dewaxed to produce this specialty product. Generally, a virgin heavy fuel oil of the same boiling range would be difficult to dewax and would result in a very short dewaxing operating cycle. The hydrocracked heavy fuel oil 22, however, because of its low levels of nitrogen, is a relatively easy stock to dewax and can result in very long dewaxing cycles.
  • Fig. 4 illustrates a scheme in which dewaxing of a heavy gas oil is followed by hydrocracking. In Fig. 4, heavy gas oil passes through a conduit 10, which is attached to a catalytic dewaxing unit 110, to produce a dewaxed heavy gas oil stream 112. Stream 112 is then dewaxed by a post-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 120 to produce a hydrocracked product stream 122. Both the catalytic dewaxing unit 110 and the post-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 120 operate at the conditions outlined for the hydrocracking unit 20 above.
  • The hydrocracked product stream 122 passes into a distillation unit 130 where it is separated to form a naphtha stream 132, a jet fuel stream 134, a distillate stream 136 and a heavy fuel oil stream 138. This produces a high yield of low freeze jet fuel and low pour point distillate. Preferably, the naphtha stream will include hydrocarbons having boiling points (b.p.) ranging from 120° to 380°F (50° to 195°C), jet fuel ranging from 380° to 450°F (195° to 230°C), distillate ranging from 450° to 650°F (230° to 345°C), and heavy fuel oil ranging from 650°Ff (345°C+). Also, preferably the jet fuel stream 134 will have a freeze point ranging from -40° to -58°F (-40° to -50°C) and the distillate stream 136 and heavy fuel oil stream 138 will have pour points ranging from -10° to 25°F (-23° to -4°C). However, the cut points and required product specifications may be changed to accommodate refinery customers. Cut points may be adjusted by adjusting distillation parameters, as outlined above. For example, the distillate b.p. range may be extended during the winter to accommodate increased demand for distillate fuels. Other product specifications, such as pour point or freeze point, may be adjusted by adjusting cut point of the product or adjusting operating conditions, such as temperature or pressure, in the catalytic dewaxing unit or hydrocracking unit.
  • Another embodiment of the invention is shown by Fig. 5, which adds a pre-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 100 to the embodiment of Fig. 4. Unit 100 operates in the same range of conditions outlined above for the hydrocracking unit 20. Heavy gas oil is fed through a conduit 10 to the pre-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 100 to increase cycle length above that obtainable by the apparatus for the method of Fig. 4. The pre-dewaxing unit 100 produces a pre-dewaxing hydrocrackate which passes through conduit 102 to the catalytic dewaxing unit 110. Dewaxing by the pre-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 100 removes the paraffins from the catalytic dewaxing effluent stream 112, which otherwise feed the post-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 120. The hydrocracking units 100, 120 and dewaxing unit 110 operate at conditions as described above. Removal of the paraffins from pre-dewaxing hydrocrackate stream 102 may result in improved post-dewaxing hydrocracking catalyst performance because paraffins are the most difficult molecules to hydrocrack. After post-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 120, a high yield of low freeze point jet fuel and low pour point distillate will result because the wax molecules have been removed. MDDW catalyst performance is also enhanced because many of the catalyst poisons have been removed by the pre-dewaxing hydrocracking unit 100.
  • All of the above embodiments have the advantage of selectively increasing yields of jet fuel, distillate or heavy fuel oil. The system of Fig. 1 allows increased production of jet fuel and the system of Fig. 2 allows increased production of distillate fuel. The systems of Figs. 1 and 2 allow higher BTU/gallon (kJ/m3) content in the jet fuel and distillate fuels respectively, thus resulting in higher value products. There are higher BTU's/gallon (kJ/m3) in the jet fuel or distillate fuels, because the catalytic dewaxing allows denser hydrocarbons to be blended into the jet fuel or distillate fuel respectively. The hydrocracking unit also enhances the operation of the catalytic dewaxing unit because hydrocracking removes materials, such as nitrogen, which are poisonous to catalytic dewaxing catalysts.
  • The system of Fig. 3 allows for enhanced production of a heavy fuel oil having a low pour point. Generally, a virgin heavy fuel oil of the same boiling range would be difficult to dewax and would result in a very short dewaxing operating cycle. The hydrocracked heavy fuel oil, however, because of its low levels of nitrogen is a relatively easy stock to dewax and can result in very long dewaxing cycles. Additionally, the embodiments of Figs. 1-3 can result in production of high octane MDDW gasoline and C3/C4 olefinic streams as by-products of the catalytic dewaxing unit.
  • The systems of Figs. 4 and 5 allow for the use of smaller hydrocracker reactors, possible reduction of hydrogen consumption in hydrocracking, production of high octane MDDW gasoline and Cε/C4 streams from MDDW, higher BTU/gallon (kJ/m3) content in both the jet fuel and distillate streams and increased yields of low freeze/pour point jet fuel and distillate. The system of Fig. 4 allows for a simple processing scheme requiring relatively few unit operations, while the system of Fig. 5 allows for longer cycle lengths than from the system of Fig. 4 because materials which are poisonous to dewaxing catalysts are removed by the pre-dewaxing hydrocracking unit.
  • Although the hydrocracking catalysts per se individually are not regarded as part of this invention, it is noted that a wide variety of hydrocracking catalysts are suitable for use in the process of the invention. Such catalysts in general possess an acid function and a hydrogenation function, exemplified by a porous acidic oxide, such as a silica alumina or silica zirconia, associated with a nickel-tungsten or palladium or platinum, or cobalt-moly or nickel-moly component. In general, a Group VIII metal or a combination of a Group VI and a Group VIII metal, as the oxides or sulfides thereof, deposited on silica alumina or silica or zirconia, may serve as hydrocracking catalyst.
  • The process is effective for improving the dewaxing performance of intermediate pore or large pore zeolites, which are described below, because the hydrocracking of the invention removes nitrogen compounds which are believed to inhibit the dewaxing activity of most dewaxing catalysts.
  • The catalysts employed in the dewaxing units described above may be the same type or different. However, they will possess shape-selective paraffin cracking ability. Catalysts that have shape-selective qualities include crystalline zeolites and crystalline silica alumina phosphates (SAPO). These materials may be bound in a variety of matrices, such as those containing silica alumina or silica and alumina alone. The catalysts may contain up to 15% metals that are known to possess a hydrogenation ability. The preferred hydrogenation components are the noble metals of Group VIII, especially platinum and palladium, but other noble metals, such as iridium, ruthenium or rhodium, may also be used. Combinations of noble metals with non-noble metals, such as nickel, rhenium, tungsten, chromium and molybdenum are of interest. Combinations of Group VIB and Group VIII are also of interest. Base metal hydrogenation components may also be used especially nickel, cobalt, molybdenum, tungsten, copper or zinc.
  • The metal may be incorporated into the catalyst by any suitable method, such as impregnation or exchange onto the zeolite. The metal may be incorporated in the form of a cationic, anionic or a neutral complex, such as
    Figure imgb0001
    and cationic complexes of this type will be found convenient for exchanging metals onto a zeolite. Anionic complexes are also useful for impregnating metals into the zeolites.
  • The zeolites useful for dewaxing are termed medium or intermediate pore zeolites and are characterized by en effective pore size of generally less than about 7 Angstroms (0.7 nm), and/or pore windows in a crystal formed by 10-membered rings. The medium or intermediate pore zeolites are represented by those zeolites having the structure of ZSM-5, ZSM-11, ZSM-23, ZSM-35, ZSM-38, ZSM-48 and TMA (tetra methyl ammonium) Offretite.
  • By «intermediate pore size zeolite», as used herein, is meant zeolites having the unique characteristic of being able to differentiate between large molecules and molecules containing quaternary carbon atoms on the one hand, and smaller molecules on the other hand. Thus, the intermediate pore size materials have surprising catalytic selectivities by reason of their effective pore apertures, as well as highly desirable and surprising catalytic activity and stability, when compared to most of the larger pore size crystalline zeolites.
  • By «intermediate pore size», as used herein, is meant an effective pore aperture probably in the range of about 5 to 6.5 Angstroms (0.5 to 0.65 nm) when the zeolite is in the H-form. Zeolites having pore apertures in this range tend to have unique zeolite characteristics and to be particularly useful in dewaxing. Unlike small pore size zeolites, such as erionite and chabazite, they will allow hydrocarbons having some branching into the zeolite void spaces. Unlike larger pore size zeolites, such as the faujasites, they can differentiate between n-alkalines and slightly branched alkanes having, for example quaternary carbon atoms.
  • The effective pore size of zeolites can be measured using standard adsorption techniques and compounds of known minimum kinetic diameters. The preferred effective pore size range is from about 5.3 to 6.2 Angstroms (0.53 to 0.62 nm). See Breck, Zeolite Molecular Sieves. 1974 (especially Chapter 8) and Anderson et al, J. Catalvsis 58, 114 (1979), both of which are incorporated by reference.
  • Intermediate pore size zeolites in the H-form will typically admit molecules having kinetic diameters of 5.0 to 6.5 Angstroms with little hindrance. Examples of such compounds (and their kinetic diameters in Angstroms) (nm) are: n-hexane (4.3) (0.43), 3 methylpentane (5.5) (0.55), benzene (5.85) (0.585), and toluene (5.8) (0.58). Compounds having kinetic diameters of about 6 to 6.5 (0.6 to 0.65 nm) Angstroms can be admitted into the pores, depending on the particular zeolite, but do not penetrate as quickly and, in some cases, are effectively excluded. Compounds having kinetic diameters in the range of 6 to 6.5 Angstroms include: cyclohexane (6.0) (0.6 nm), 2,3 dimethylbutane (6.1) (0.61 nm), m-xylene (6.1), and 1,2,3,4 tetramethylbenzene (6.4) (0.64 nm). Generally compounds having kinetic diameters of greater than about 6.5 Angstroms do not penetrate the pore apertures, and thus are not absorbed into the interior of the zeolite lattice. Examples of such larger compounds include: hexamethylbenzene (7.1), 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (7.5) (0.75 nm), and tributylamine (8.1) (0.81 nm).
  • In performing adsorption measurements to determine effective pore size, standard techniques are used. It is convenient to consider a particular molecule as excluded if it does not fill at least 80% of the zeolite pore volume in less than about one hour (p/po = 0.5; 25°C).
  • The acid activity of zeolite catalysts is conveniently defined by the alpha scale described in an article published in Journal of Catalysis, Vol. VI, pp. 278-287 (1966). In this text, the zeolite catalyst is contacted with hexane under conditions prescribed in the publication, and the amount of hexane which is cracked is measured. From this measurement is computed an «alpha» value, which characterizes the catalyst for its cracking activity for hexane. The entire article above referred to is incorporated herein by reference. The alpha scale so described will be used herein to define activity levels for cracking n-hexane. And, in particular, for purposes of this invention, a catalyst with an alpha value of not greater than about 1.0, and preferably not greater than about 0.5, will be considered to have substantially no activity for cracking hexane.
  • Another class of zeolites useful for hydrodewaxing are termed large pore zeolites and have a pore size larger than the medium pore zeolites and sufficiently large to admit the vast majority of components normally found in a feedstock. These zeolites generally are stated to have a pore size in excess of 7.5 Angstroms (0.75 nm) and/or formed by 12-membered rings. The large pore zeolites are represented by ZSM-4, ZSM-12, ZSM-20, Zeolie Beta, Mordenite, TEA (tetra ethyl ammonium) Mordenite, Dealu- minized Y, and Rare Earth Y. Additionally, the large pore component may include a low sodium Ultrastable Y molecular sieve (USY). Generally, with the exception of Zeolite Beta, the large pore zeolites have less hydrodewaxing effectiveness than the intermediate pore zeolites.
  • ZSM-4 is described in U.S. Patent 3 923 639. ZSM-5 is described in U.S. Patents 3 702 886 and Re. 29 948. ZSM-11 is described in U.S. Patent 3 709 976. ZSM-12 is described in U.S. Patent 3 832 449. ZSM-20 is described in U.S. Patent 3 972 983. ZSM-23 is described in U.S. Patent 4 076 842. ZSM-35 is described in U.S. Patent 4 016 245. ZSM-38 is described in U.S. Patent 4 046 859. ZSM-48 is described in U.S. Patent 4 397 827. Zeolite Beta is described in U.S. Patents 3 308 069 and Re. 28 341. USY is described in U.S. Patents 3 293 192 and 3 449 070.
  • The catalysts preferred for use herein include crystalline alumina silicate zeolites having a silica-to- alumina ratio of at least 12, a Constraint Index of about 0.5 to 12 and acid cracking activity of about 160-200. A suitable shape selective catalyst for a fixed bed reactor is an HZSM-5 zeolite with alumina binder in the form of cylindrical extrudates of about 1-5 millimeters. HZSM-5 is a ZSM-5 type catalyst with only hydrogen on the active catalyst sites and no metals on these sites. Other catalysts which may be used in one or more reactor stages include siliceous materials with pore size in the range of 5 to 9 Angstroms (0.5 to 0.9 nm). These include borosilicates, ferrosilicates and/or aluminosilicates, disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 4 414143 and 4 417 088.
  • The following Examples illustrate the invention.
  • Example 1
  • Example 1 demonstrates the operability of a configuration as in Fig. 3 in which a hydrocracked heavy hydrocarbon stream is catalytically dewaxed. The properties of the feed are listed in Table 1 and the feed represents stream 98, as in Fig. 3. The dewaxing unit feed is taken from a moderate pressure (about 800 psig (56.2 bar) hydrogen partial pressure) hydrocracker product and comprises hydrocarbons having a boiling point from 650° (343°C) to about 1050°F (566°C). The hydrocarbons were dewaxed over a fresh, steamed, 1/16 inch Ni-ZSM-5 catalyst containing about 1% nickel. A test reactor was employed to represent catalytic dewaxing unit 90 of Fig. 3 and contained about 50 cubic centimeters of catalyst sample. The test reactor had an inside diameter of 7/8 inch (2.22 cm) and a 3/16 inch (0.48 cm) thermal well at its center and was operated isothermally. The dewaxing reactor operated for 20 days at a hydrogen partial pressure of 400 psig (28.6 bar), a space velocity of 1.5 LHSV, a hydrogen treat rate of 2000 SCF H2/bbl (356 m3/m3) feed and a start-of-cycle temperature of 500°F (260°C) and a line out temperature of 550°F (288°C). The line out temperature is the temperature at which catalysts can be run without substantial aging, for example, less than 5°F (2.8°C) per month. It is expected that a commercial unit for dewaxing of effluent from a moderate pressure hydrocracker would achieve an and-of-cycle temperature of 800°F (427°C) after two years operation to produce a 20°F (-6.1 °C) pour point product.
  • Table 2 shows the product yields from the dewaxing reactor. The dewaxed product is representative of stream 56 of Fig. 3. Over 90% of the hydrocracked feed was converted to 330°F+ (166°C+) boiling point (b.p.) hydrocarbon product, hydrocarbons in the naphtha/gasoline boiling range of Cs-330°F b.p. and lighter hydrocarbons comprising Cs. Table 1 lists the product properties of the gasoline range products and the 330°F+ b.p. products.
  • Table 3 shows the product properties of the 330°F+ b.p. product stream which has been separated into a 330° to 725°F (385°C) distillate stream and a 725° to 1050°F (566°C) b.p. dewaxed heavy fuel oil stream. The results shown by Tables 1-3 indicate a heavy fuel oil product having a low pour point can be produced by hydrocracking a stream prior to dewaxing.
    Figure imgb0002
    Figure imgb0003
  • Example 2
  • Example 2 demonstrates the results of dewaxing a virgin heavy gas oil having the properties listed in Table 4. The virgin feed had boiling points comparable to those of the hydrocracked feed of Example 1. The dewaxing was conducted in the same isothermal test reactor as in Example 1, having an inside diameter of 7/8 inch and 3/16 inch thermal well at its center. The test reactor contained 50 cc of catalyst. The catalyst was the same type as in Example 1, namely, fresh, steamed, 1/16 inch (0.16 cm) Ni-ZSM-5 catalyst containing about 1 wt% nickel. Dewaxing occurred at a hydrogen partial pressure of 400 psig, a space velocity of 1 LHSV, a hydrogen feed rate fo 2000 SCF Hz/bbl feedstock, a start-of-cycle temperature of 500°F and end-of-run temperature of 760°F (404.5°C). This test ran for 41 days to make a 20°F pour point product. Although the test was ended at 760°F, it is estimated that the test could have been run to an end-of-cycle temperature of 800°F after two months total operation.
  • Table 4 lists the product properties for the naphtha/gasoline range components containing Cs-330°F boiling point (b.p.) hydrocarbons and a heavier hydrocarbon stream containing 330°F+ b.p. hydrocarbons. The distillation data shown for the Cs-330°F b.p. gasoline product consists of estimated values. Table 4 shows that although a 20°F pour points heavier hydrocarbon product can be produced by dewaxing of a heavy hydrocarbon stream alone, this causes a high catalyst aging rate which results in only a two month cycle time. Comparing the results of Example 1 and Example 2 shows that hydrocracking a feed prior to dewaxing reduces aging rates. Thus, hydrocracking a heavy hydrocarbon feedstock prior to dewaxing results in a cycle time estimated to be two years, as opposed to dewaxing without prior hydrocracking, which results in a cycle time estimated to be two months.
  • Figure imgb0004

Claims (9)

1. A process for selectively increasing the yield of a hydrocarbon product from a heavy gas oil hydrocarbon feedstock comprising the steps of:
hydrocracking the feedstock in a hydrocracking unit operating at a space velocity of 0.25 to 3 LHSV, a temperature of 260 to 455°C, a hydrogen partial pressure of 35.5 to 208 bar and a hydrogen feed rate of 89 to 3560 m3/m3 of said feedstock, thereby producing a hydrocracked product;
distilling the hydrocracking product to produce a lighter boiling range stream, which is a normal refinery product stream, and a heavier boiling range stream of fluidity properties inferior to those of said refinery product stream;
catalytically dewaxing said heavier boiling range stream at 0.5 to 10 LHSV, 204 to 454°C, 4.5 to 173 bar hydrogen partial pressure an 89 to 1780 m3/m3 hydrogen feed rate; and blending the thus dewaxed heavier boiling range stream with said lighter boiling range stream.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein hydrocracking is carried out at a space velocity of 0.5 to 2 LHSV, a temperature of 343 to 427°C, a hydrogen partial pressure of 104.5 to 173.5 bar, and a hydrogen feed rate of 356 to 1780 m3/m3 of said feedstock, thereby producing a hydrocracked product; and catalytic dewaxing is carried out at a space velocity of 0.5 to 5 LHSV, a temperature of 246 to 427°C, hydrogen partial pressure of 4.5 bar to 104.5 bar and hydrogen feed rate of 89 to 534 m3/m3.
3. A process according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein said lighter boiling range stream has the same fluidity specification as the dewaxed stream with which it is blended.
4. A process according to claim 3, wherein said heavier boiling range is heavy kerosene comprising 232 to 288°C b.p. hydrocarbons, said lighter boiling range stream comprises a jet fuel, and the dewaxed stream comprises a low freeze point heavy kerosene.
5. A process according to claim 3 or claim 4, wherein the fluidity specification comprises a freeze point from -40 to -50°C.
6. A process according to claim 5, wherein the distilling step produces a heavy fuel oil stream comprising 343+ °C b.p. hydrocarbons and a portion of the heavy fuel oil is combined with the feedstock and recycled to the hydrocracking step.
7. A process according to claim 3, wherein the lighter boiling range stream comprises 193 to 343°C b.p. hydrocarbons and the heavier boiling range stream is a hydrocracked heavy distillate comprising 343 to 399°C b.p. hydrocarbons.
8. A process according to claim 7, wherein the fluidity specification comprises a pour point from -23.3 to -3.9°C.
9. A process according to claim 8, wherein the distilling step produces a heavy fuel oil comprising 399°C+ hydrocarbons and a portion of the heavy fuel oil is combined with the feedstock and recycled to the hydrocracking step.
EP85308595A 1984-12-27 1985-11-27 Process for hydrocracking and catalytic dewaxing Expired EP0189648B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT85308595T ATE45177T1 (en) 1984-12-27 1985-11-27 HYDROCRACKING AND CATALYTIC DEWAXING PROCESSES.

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US68685884A 1984-12-27 1984-12-27
US686858 1984-12-27

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0189648A1 EP0189648A1 (en) 1986-08-06
EP0189648B1 true EP0189648B1 (en) 1989-08-02

Family

ID=24758040

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP85308595A Expired EP0189648B1 (en) 1984-12-27 1985-11-27 Process for hydrocracking and catalytic dewaxing

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0189648B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH0715103B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE45177T1 (en)
CA (1) CA1268439A (en)
DE (1) DE3572003D1 (en)

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4743354A (en) * 1979-10-15 1988-05-10 Union Oil Company Of California Process for producing a product hydrocarbon having a reduced content of normal paraffins
GB8629477D0 (en) * 1986-12-10 1987-01-21 Shell Int Research Manufacture of kerosene/gas oils
US4764266A (en) * 1987-02-26 1988-08-16 Mobil Oil Corporation Integrated hydroprocessing scheme for production of premium quality distillates and lubricants
AU683938B2 (en) * 1993-10-08 1997-11-27 Albemarle Netherlands B.V. Hydrocracking and hydrodewaxing process
US5447621A (en) * 1994-01-27 1995-09-05 The M. W. Kellogg Company Integrated process for upgrading middle distillate production
US5603824A (en) * 1994-08-03 1997-02-18 Mobil Oil Corporation Hydrocarbon upgrading process
GB2311789B (en) * 1996-04-01 1998-11-04 Fina Research Process for converting wax-containing hydrocarbon feedstocks into high-grade middle distillate products
US7261805B2 (en) * 1999-02-24 2007-08-28 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Process for catalytic dewaxing and catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon streams
NL1027779C2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2006-09-20 Shell Int Research Systems and methods for preparing a crude product.
US9127217B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2015-09-08 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Method of making high energy distillate fuels
US9212325B2 (en) 2011-09-13 2015-12-15 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Diesel fuel production during lubricant base oil hydroprocessing

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3894938A (en) * 1973-06-15 1975-07-15 Mobil Oil Corp Catalytic dewaxing of gas oils
JPS51565A (en) * 1974-06-24 1976-01-06 Ngk Spark Plug Co Oshidashihokonioite mageraretabubunojusuru seikeibutsuno oshidashiseikeisochi
US4210521A (en) * 1977-05-04 1980-07-01 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalytic upgrading of refractory hydrocarbon stocks
US4257872A (en) * 1979-10-22 1981-03-24 Mobil Oil Corporation Low pressure hydrocracking of refractory feed
US4283271A (en) * 1980-06-12 1981-08-11 Mobil Oil Corporation Manufacture of hydrocracked low pour lubricating oils
US4325805A (en) * 1980-12-18 1982-04-20 Chevron Research Company Lubricating oil stabilization
CA1188247A (en) * 1981-04-02 1985-06-04 Nai Y. Chen Process for making naphthenic lubestocks from raw distillate by combination hydrodewaxing/hydrogenation
NZ204093A (en) * 1982-05-18 1985-01-31 Mobil Oil Corp Simultaneous catalytic hydrocracking and hydrodewaxing of hydrocarbon oils using zeolite beta
JPS5924791A (en) * 1982-07-31 1984-02-08 Toa Nenryo Kogyo Kk Preparation of low-pour point petroleum product

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0189648A1 (en) 1986-08-06
JPS61157584A (en) 1986-07-17
ATE45177T1 (en) 1989-08-15
JPH0715103B2 (en) 1995-02-22
DE3572003D1 (en) 1989-09-07
CA1268439A (en) 1990-05-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7261805B2 (en) Process for catalytic dewaxing and catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon streams
EP0095303B1 (en) Catalytic dewaxing process
EP0832171B1 (en) Catalytic dewaxing process
US4229282A (en) Catalytic dewaxing of hydrocarbon oils
US4213847A (en) Catalytic dewaxing of lubes in reactor fractionator
US4259170A (en) Process for manufacturing lube base stocks
US5990371A (en) Process for the selective hydroisomerization of long linear and/or slightly branched paraffins using a catalyst based on a molecular sieve
US4211635A (en) Catalytic conversion of hydrocarbons
CA1119547A (en) Combination process for octane upgrading the low-octane c.sub.5-c.sub.6 component of a gasoline
US20010001449A1 (en) Low-pressure hydrocracking process
EP1153108A1 (en) Process for producing diesel fuel with increased cetane number
US4648957A (en) Lube hydrodewaxing method and apparatus with light product removal and enhanced lube yields
US6198015B1 (en) Catalyst based on a molecular sieve and a process for selective hydroisomerisation of long linear and/or slightly branched paraffins using that catalyst
EP0189648B1 (en) Process for hydrocracking and catalytic dewaxing
CA1181355A (en) Method for enhancing catalytic activity
US4944862A (en) Integrated catalytic dewaxing and catalytic cracking process
US4332670A (en) Catalytic dewaxing of middle distillates
US4695364A (en) Lube or light distillate hydrodewaxing method and apparatus with light product removal and enhanced lube yields
US5053117A (en) Catalytic dewaxing
EP0188898B1 (en) Cascade dewaxing process
EP0104807B1 (en) Use of high pressure to improve product quality and increase cycle length in catalytic lube dewaxing
US5364997A (en) Process for converting multi-branched heavy hydrocarbons to high octane gasoline
EP0181066A2 (en) Process for dewaxing heavy distillates and residual liquids
EP0149875B1 (en) Hydroisomerization of catalytically dewaxed lubricating oils
US4478709A (en) Process for stabilizing dewaxed distillate oils

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE DE FR GB IT NL

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19870128

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19871125

TCAT At: translation of patent claims filed
GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE DE FR GB IT NL

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 45177

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19890815

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3572003

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19890907

ET Fr: translation filed
ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
ITTA It: last paid annual fee
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20031002

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20031002

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20031002

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20031105

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20031128

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20031216

Year of fee payment: 19

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041127

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041127

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041130

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *MOBIL OIL CORP.

Effective date: 20041130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050601

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050601

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20041127

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050729

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20050601

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *MOBIL OIL CORP.

Effective date: 20041130