CN117221075B - Discrete networking system fault detection method based on self-adaptive event trigger mechanism - Google Patents
Discrete networking system fault detection method based on self-adaptive event trigger mechanism Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN117221075B CN117221075B CN202311339682.4A CN202311339682A CN117221075B CN 117221075 B CN117221075 B CN 117221075B CN 202311339682 A CN202311339682 A CN 202311339682A CN 117221075 B CN117221075 B CN 117221075B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- fault detection
- discrete
- following
- representing
- time
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 79
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 34
- 230000006855 networking Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 23
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 27
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000003416 augmentation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012886 linear function Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000005265 energy consumption Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 12
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013139 quantization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
- Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
- Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y04S10/50—Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications
- Y04S10/52—Outage or fault management, e.g. fault detection or location
Landscapes
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a discrete networking system fault detection method based on a self-adaptive event trigger mechanism, which comprises the following steps: 1. establishing a discrete networked system model containing uncertainty factors, randomly generated nonlinear phenomena, external disturbance and system fault signals; 2. establishing a signal continuous packet loss model; 3. setting an adaptive event triggering mechanism; 4. establishing a fault detection filter model; 5. based on Lyapunov stability theorem, the system is randomly stable in a limited time and meets H ∞ Judging basis of performance index constraint; 6. and setting a fault detection mechanism of the discrete networking system. The invention can avoid unnecessary triggering events when the system is inactive or the demand is low, thereby saving calculation and communication resources, reducing energy consumption, and triggering events in real time according to the system demand, thereby responding to changes more quickly, improving the response speed of the system and detecting the occurrence of faults in time.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to a fault detection method of a discrete networking system, in particular to a fault detection method of a discrete networking system based on a self-adaptive event trigger mechanism.
Background
Networking systems have been widely used in the critical fields of aerospace, industrial automation, electricity and energy, and we enjoyed unprecedented convenience and efficiency. However, as networked systems continue to evolve, so too does the complexity and technical challenges. One of the most attractive challenges is the problem of fault detection.
In a discrete networked system, information transmission is affected by multiple factors including uncertainty factors, randomly occurring nonlinearities, network attacks, signal quantization, communication time lags, and interference of network-induced phenomena such as packet loss. Among these network-induced phenomena, uncertainty factors, random non-linearities, and continuous packet loss often occur, which makes the conventional failure detection method frustrating. Thus, it becomes particularly important to study the design of fault detection filters for discrete networked systems with random non-linearities and uncertainties in the case of continuous packet loss.
In the prior art, conventional fault detection methods generally adopt a static event trigger mechanism or a time trigger mode for checking, and the methods can greatly increase network transmission pressure, waste network resources and lack enough flexibility to cope with challenges caused by system complexity.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a discrete networking system fault detection method based on a self-adaptive event triggering mechanism, which aims to solve the problem that the existing method can not simultaneously process the fault detection of an uncertainty discrete networking system under the conditions of random nonlinear phenomenon and continuous packet loss. According to the method, a more accurate fault detection filter system is established by considering uncertainty factors, randomly generated nonlinear phenomena and continuous packet loss possibly occurring in actual transmission in a discrete networked system, so that the false alarm rate is reduced, the occurrence of faults can be more accurately detected, and the cost and risk of system maintenance are reduced. Meanwhile, the invention applies the self-adaptive event triggering mechanism to the fault detection process, and the mechanism can respond to the change of the system state in real time without depending on static rules or preset time intervals, thereby reducing the total amount of network transmission data, effectively reducing the total amount of network transmission data, saving network resources, accurately detecting faults and improving the accuracy and efficiency of fault detection.
The invention aims at realizing the following technical scheme:
a discrete network system fault detection method based on an adaptive event trigger mechanism comprises the following steps:
step one, establishing a discrete networked system model containing uncertainty factors, randomly-occurring nonlinear phenomena, external disturbance and system fault signals:
wherein x is k A state vector representing the system at time k; x is x k+1 A state vector representing the system at time k+1; y is k Representing the measurement output obtained by the system at the time k; g (x) k ) Representing a non-linear function, where k.epsilon.0, N]N is a positive integer; w (w) k And f k Respectively representing external disturbance and fault signals at the time k; a, C, D 1 ,D 2 ,E 1 ,E 2 As a constant matrix, ΔA is the parameter uncertainty, α k Is a bernoulli random variable;
step two, establishing a signal continuous packet loss model:
wherein y is k-1 Representing the measured output obtained by the system at time k-1, the variable ε k Is a Bernoulli random variable;
step three, setting a self-adaptive event triggering mechanism:
step three, definitionWherein->And->Respectively representing the measured value transmitted at the last self-adaptive event triggering moment and the measured output sampled at the current moment, and psi k Representing the transmission error between the measured value transmitted at the last self-adaptive event triggering moment and the measured output sampled at the current moment;
step three, defining an event generator function:
wherein Ω=Ω T > 0 is a given event weighting matrix; delta k Is an event trigger threshold; if the condition phi (phi) k ,δ k ) The measurement output sampled at the current moment is transmitted to the fault detection filter side through a network; transmission signal y k Is defined as:
wherein, the event trigger time sequence 0 is less than or equal to k 0 <k 1 <…<k t < … is determined by the following trigger conditions:
k t+1 =inf{k∈[0,N]|k>k t ,Φ(ψ k ,δ k )>0}
k t+1 representing the next event trigger time;
step four, establishing a fault detection filter model:
step four, according to the actually received measurement output y k A fault detection filter model is constructed of the form:
wherein,r is the state vector of the fault detection filter at time k k As residual signal, A F ,B F ,D F ,E F A filter parameter matrix of appropriate dimension to be designed;
step IV, bySum phi k Defining, the fault detection filter model is rewritten as follows:
step IV, definitionAccording to the discrete networked system model in the first step and the fault detection filter model in the fourth step, the system is subjected to augmentation treatment to obtain the following fault detection filter residual error system:
the matrix elements therein are as follows:
fourth, through designing the self-adaptive event triggering mechanism and the fault detection filter model, the obtained fault detection filtering residual error system meets the following conditions:
(1) When v k =0, given matrix W > 0, scalar c 1 ,c 2 Satisfy constraint 0 < c 1 <c 2 When the following formula holds:
the fault detection filtering residual error system is randomly stable for a limited time;
(2) When v k With a value of not equal to 0, under zero initial conditions,the following constraints are satisfied:
wherein, gamma is a positive scalar, and the fault detection filtering residual error system satisfies H ∞ Performance index constraints;
step five, based on Lyapunov stability theorem, obtaining random stability of the system in a limited time and meeting H ∞ The basis for judging the performance index constraint is as follows:
λ 0 W<P<λ 1 W
λ 1 c 1 ≤χ -N λ 0 c 2
wherein,
step six, setting a fault detection mechanism of the discrete networking system:
step six, constructing a residual error evaluation function J for realizing fault detection of the discrete networking system k And a detection threshold J th :
Step six, detecting whether the discrete networking system has faults according to the following judging standards:
compared with the prior art, the invention has the following advantages:
1. aiming at the discrete networking system with uncertainty factors and random nonlinear phenomena, the invention provides the fault detection of the discrete networking system based on the self-adaptive event triggering mechanism under the condition of continuous packet loss, and simultaneously considers the influence of the random nonlinear phenomena and the continuous packet loss on the system performance, thereby better processing the problem of repeated data in the data transmission process, reducing the network transmission pressure and improving the data transmission efficiency. Different from the traditional static event triggering mechanism, the fault detection method of the invention simultaneously processes the fault detection problems of uncertainty factors, random nonlinear phenomena and continuous packet loss phenomena in a limited time, adopts the self-adaptive event triggering mechanism to judge whether data are transmitted or not, and the triggering condition depends on the measurement output sampled at the current moment, the measurement value transmitted at the last self-adaptive event triggering moment and the triggering threshold value, wherein the triggering threshold value is adjusted in real time according to the current system state instead of the fixed threshold value parameter, thus avoiding unnecessary triggering events when the system is inactive or the demand is lower, saving calculation and communication resources, reducing energy consumption, and triggering events in real time according to the system demand, thereby responding to changes more quickly and improving the response speed of the system.
2. The invention analyzes by means of Lyapunov stability theorem, solves the parameters of the fault detection filter in the form of LMI linear matrix inequality, considers the system to meet H ∞ The performance index constraint condition can ensure that the system is randomly stable in a limited time. Compared with a static event trigger mechanism transmission mode, the data quantity transmitted in the same time period is reduced by 40%. This means that the network communication is more efficient, more bandwidth can be reserved for other important tasks, the failure detection efficiency is improved, and the stability of the system can be ensured under the condition of continuous packet loss.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method of discrete networked system failure detection under an adaptive event triggering mechanism.
Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of residual signal output of a discrete networked motor stirring system in an embodiment.
FIG. 3 is a residual evaluation function output schematic of a discrete networked motor stirring system in an embodiment.
Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of trigger thresholds under adaptive event based trigger conditions in an embodiment.
Fig. 5 is a schematic diagram of stability of a fault detection filter residual system in an embodiment.
Fig. 6 is a diagram of data transmission timing and event trigger intervals based on an adaptive event trigger condition in an embodiment.
Fig. 7 is a diagram of data transmission timing and event trigger intervals based on a static event trigger condition in an embodiment.
Detailed Description
The following description of the present invention is provided with reference to the accompanying drawings, but is not limited to the following description, and any modifications or equivalent substitutions of the present invention should be included in the scope of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
The invention provides a discrete networking system fault detection method based on a self-adaptive event trigger mechanism, as shown in fig. 1, the method comprises the following steps:
step one, a discrete networked system model comprising uncertainty factors, randomly generated nonlinear phenomena, external disturbance and system fault signals is established.
In this step, the discrete networked system model is as follows:
in the method, in the process of the invention,a state vector of the system at the time k is represented, and n represents an n-dimensional vector; />A state vector representing the system at time k+1; />Representing the measurement output obtained by the system at the moment k, wherein m represents an m-dimensional vector; />Representing a non-linear function, where k.epsilon.0, N]N is a positive integer; />And->Respectively represent the external disturbance and fault signals at time k, which belong to l 2 [0,N]S represents an s-dimensional vector, l represents an l-dimensional vector, l 2 [0,N]Represent [0, N ]]A space of squarable sum vector functions; a, C, D 1 ,D 2 ,E 1 ,E 2 Deltaa is the parameter uncertainty, a constant matrix of appropriate dimensions.
Considering the system parameter uncertainty, ΔA should satisfy the following constraints:
ΔA=HFL
where H, L is a known constant matrix of appropriate dimension, F is an unknown matrix satisfying constraint F T F≤I。
Assume that the nonlinear function satisfies the following Lipschitz condition:
||g(x k )|| 2 ≤μ k ||Mx k || 2
wherein mu k > 0 is a known positive scalar and M is a positive definite matrix of appropriate dimension.
The randomly occurring nonlinear phenomenon can be represented by the Bernoulli random variable alpha k To describe, it satisfies the following probability distribution:
wherein,is a positive scalar, ++>Representing parameter uncertainty, satisfying constraint conditionsIs a known positive scalar.
And step two, establishing a signal continuous packet loss model.
Consider that a sensor may experience continuous packet loss during the acquisition of measurement signals. This network-induced phenomenon can be expressed in the following form:
wherein y is k-1 Representing the measured output obtained by the system at time k-1, the variable ε k Also a Bernoulli random variable, satisfies the following probability distribution:
wherein,is also a known positive scalar, < >>Representing parameter uncertainty, satisfying constraint +.>Beta is a known positive scalar. If epsilon k =1, sensor data transmission was successful; otherwiseThe sensor will continue to lose packets. It should be noted that α k And epsilon k Are random variables independent of each other.
Step three, setting a self-adaptive event triggering mechanism.
In order to save energy, an adaptive event triggering mechanism is used to decide whether the measurement output at the current sampling instant can be transmitted to the fault detection filter side. To better explain the adaptive event trigger mechanism, first defineWherein->And->Respectively representing the measured value transmitted at the last self-adaptive event triggering moment and the measured output sampled at the current moment, and psi k Representing the transmission error between the measured value transmitted at the last self-adaptive event triggering time and the measured output sampled at the current time. An event generator function is then defined, as shown in the following equation:
wherein Ω=Ω T > 0 is a given event weighting matrix; delta k Is an event trigger threshold that satisfies the following adaptive control law:
wherein ρ is 1 And ρ 2 Are defined parameters which satisfy the constraint 0 < ρ 1 ≤ρ 2 < 1; the positive scalar k is the adjustment function ||ψ k || 2 Is a high sensitivity. If the condition phi (phi) k ,δ k ) The measurement output sampled at the current moment is transmitted to the networkA fault detection filter side. Transmitting signalsIs defined as:
wherein, the event trigger time sequence 0 is less than or equal to k 0 <k 1 <…<k t < … is determined by the following trigger conditions:
k t+1 =inf{k∈[0,N]|k>k t ,Φ(ψ k ,δ k )>0}
k t+1 representing the next event trigger time.
And step four, establishing a fault detection filter model.
Based on the measured output actually receivedA fault detection filter model is constructed in the form of:
wherein,r is the state vector of the fault detection filter at time k k As residual signal, A F ,B F ,D F ,E F A matrix of filter parameters of appropriate dimensions to be designed. By->Sum phi k Defining, the fault detection filter model is rewritten as follows:
definition of the definitionAccording to the discrete networking system model in the first step and the fault detection filter model in the first step, the system is subjected to augmentation treatment to obtain the following fault detection filter residual error system:
the matrix elements therein are as follows:
from the foregoing, the problem of fault detection to be solved can be described as follows: by designing a self-adaptive event triggering mechanism and a fault detection filter model, the obtained fault detection filter residual error system meets the following conditions:
(1) When v k =0, given matrix W > 0, scalar c 1 ,c 2 Satisfy constraint 0 < c 1 <c 2 When the following formula holds:
the fault detection filter residual system is randomly stable for a limited time.
(2) When v k With a value of not equal to 0, under zero initial conditions,the following constraints are satisfied:
wherein, gamma is a positive scalar, and the fault detection filtering residual error system satisfies H ∞ Performance index constraints.
Step five, based on Lyapunov stability theorem, obtaining random stability of the system in a limited time and meeting H ∞ And judging the basis of the performance index constraint.
In the step, the fault detection filtering residual error system is randomly stable in a limited time and meets H ∞ The basis for judging the performance index constraint is as follows:
consider an uncertain discrete networking system in the presence of randomly occurring non-linear phenomena and continuous packet loss, for a given positive scalar kappa, χ > 1,0 < c 1 <c 2 ,0<ρ 1 ≤ρ 2 When gamma > 0, if positive definite symmetric matrix P exists, matrix X, K of proper dimension 2 Positive scalar iota, lambda 0 ,λ 1 The following formula is satisfied:
λ 0 W<P<λ 1 W
λ 1 c 1 ≤χ -N λ 0 c 2
wherein,
can ensure that the system is randomly stable for a limited time and meets H ∞ Performance index constraints.
In the step, when the stability judging condition is obtained, the Lyapunov stability theorem is used, and the constructed Lyapunov function is as follows: v (V) k =η k T Pη k At the same time define E { DeltaV k }=E{V k+1 -χV k }。
Step six, setting a fault detection mechanism of the discrete networking system.
To achieve fault detection for discrete networked systems, a residual evaluation function J is constructed k And a detection threshold J th . The residual evaluation function is used for detecting a fault signal in time when a system breaks down; the detection threshold is that when the system has no fault signal, the maximum value of the residual evaluation function is taken as the detection threshold. The specific expression is as follows:
whether the discrete networking system fails or not can be accurately detected according to the following judging standard:
examples:
in this embodiment, taking a discrete networked motor stirring system with parameter modeling uncertainty of random nonlinear and continuous packet loss as an example, the following simulation is performed by adopting the method of the present invention:
matrix parameters of the discrete networked motor stirring system with random nonlinear and continuous packet loss parameter modeling uncertainty are respectively as follows:
the relevant parameters of the uncertainty factor are:L=[0.30.2]. The relevant parameters of the nonlinear function are: />μ k =1,/> The related parameters of the continuous packet loss phenomenon are as follows: />Beta=0.1. Determining whether data is to be transmitted using an adaptive event triggering mechanism, assuming +.>ρ 1 =0.2,ρ 2 =0.7, κ=50. The initial values of the other relevant parameters are: w=i, c 1 =0.3,c 2 =7,χ=1.001,N=30,γ=1.05。
To verify the validity of the designed fault detection filter model, it is assumed that the external disturbance is denoted w k =1.2sin(1.5k)ω k ,ω k Indicated in the interval [ -0.4,0.4]Noise uniformly distributed in the inner part, and the fault signal is assumed to be:
solving a linear matrix inequality by using an LMI tool kit of Matlab, solving a feasible solution, and calculating a fault detection filter parameter matrix as follows:
D F =[0.09450.2577],E F =[-0.05300.0892]
given system initial stateThe sensitivity of the fault detection filter to fault signals and the speed of fault detection when the system is affected by external disturbance are shown in fig. 2 and 3, and when faults occur, the fault detection filter can rapidly and accurately detect the faults. The threshold of the adaptive event triggering mechanism adjusts adaptively as the state of the system changes, as shown in fig. 4. As can be seen from fig. 5, when v k When=0, the fault detection filter residual system in this embodiment is randomly stable for a finite time. FIGS. 6 and 7 illustrate the use of an adaptive event trigger mechanism and a static event trigger mechanism, respectivelyTwo different data transmission modes are manufactured, and the data transmission requirement is reduced under the self-adaptive event triggering mechanism, so that the network resource is saved, and the data transmission efficiency of the networked system is improved. It follows that the adaptive event triggering method proposed by the present invention is very significant.
Claims (1)
1. A discrete networking system fault detection method based on an adaptive event trigger mechanism is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step one, establishing a discrete networked system model containing uncertainty factors, randomly-occurring nonlinear phenomena, external disturbance and system fault signals:
wherein x is k A state vector representing the system at time k; x is x k+1 A state vector representing the system at time k+1; y is k Representing the measurement output obtained by the system at the time k; g (x) k ) Representing a non-linear function, where k.epsilon.0, N]N is a positive integer; w (w) k And f k Respectively representing external disturbance and fault signals at the time k; a, C, D 1 ,D 2 ,E 1 ,E 2 As a constant matrix, ΔA is the parameter uncertainty, α k Is a bernoulli random variable;
considering the system parameter uncertainty, ΔA satisfies the following constraint:
ΔA=HFL
where H, L is a known constant matrix and F is an unknown matrix satisfying constraint F T F≤I;
Nonlinear function g (x k ) The following Lipschitz conditions are satisfied:
||g(x k )|| 2 ≤μ k ||Mx k || 2
wherein mu k > 0 is a known positive scalar, M is a positive definite matrix of appropriate dimension;
bernoulli random variable alpha k The following probability distribution is satisfied:
wherein,is a positive scalar, ++>Representing parameter uncertainty, satisfying constraint conditions Is a known positive scalar;
step two, establishing a signal continuous packet loss model:
wherein y is k-1 Representing the measured output obtained by the system at time k-1, the variable ε k Is a Bernoulli random variable;
variable epsilon k The following probability distribution is satisfied:
wherein,is a known positive scalar, +.>Representing parameter uncertainty, satisfying constraint +.>Beta is a known positive scalar; if epsilon k =1, sensor data transmission was successful; otherwise, the sensor will continue to lose packets; alpha k And epsilon k Is a random variable independent of each other;
step three, setting a self-adaptive event triggering mechanism:
step three, definitionWherein->And->Respectively representing the measured value transmitted at the last self-adaptive event triggering moment and the measured output sampled at the current moment, and psi k Representing the transmission error between the measured value transmitted at the last self-adaptive event triggering moment and the measured output sampled at the current moment;
step three, defining an event generator function:
wherein Ω=Ω T > 0 is a given event weightingA matrix; delta k Is an event trigger threshold; if the condition phi (phi) k ,δ k ) The measurement output sampled at the current moment is transmitted to the fault detection filter side through a network; transmitting signalsIs defined as:
wherein, the event trigger time sequence 0 is less than or equal to k 0 <k 1 <…<k t < … is determined by the following trigger conditions:
k t+1 =inf{k∈[0,N]|k>k t ,Φ(ψ k ,δ k )>0}
k t+1 representing the next event trigger time;
δ k the following adaptive control rules are satisfied:
wherein ρ is 1 And ρ 2 Are defined parameters which satisfy the constraint 0 < ρ 1 ≤ρ 2 < 1; the positive scalar k is the adjustment function ||ψ k || 2 Sensitivity of (2);
step four, establishing a fault detection filter model:
step four, according to the actually received measurement outputA fault detection filter model is constructed in the form of:
wherein,r is the state vector of the fault detection filter at time k k As residual signal, A F ,B F ,D F ,E F A filter parameter matrix of appropriate dimension to be designed;
step IV, bySum phi k Defining, the fault detection filter model is rewritten as follows:
step IV, definitionAccording to the discrete networked system model in the first step and the fault detection filter model in the fourth step, the system is subjected to augmentation treatment to obtain the following fault detection filter residual error system:
the matrix elements therein are as follows:
fourth, through designing the self-adaptive event triggering mechanism and the fault detection filter model, the obtained fault detection filtering residual error system meets the following conditions:
(1) When v k =0, given matrix W > 0, scalar c 1 ,c 2 Satisfy constraint 0 < c 1 <c 2 When the following formula holds:
the fault detection filtering residual error system is randomly stable for a limited time;
(2) When v k With a value of not equal to 0, under zero initial conditions,the following constraints are satisfied:
wherein, gamma is a positive scalar, and the fault detection filtering residual error system satisfies H ∞ Performance index constraints;
step five, based on Lyapunov stability theorem, obtaining random stability of the system in a limited time and meeting H ∞ The basis for judging the performance index constraint is as follows:
λ 0 W<P<λ 1 W
λ 1 c 1 ≤χ -N λ 0 c 2
wherein,
step six, setting a fault detection mechanism of the discrete networking system:
step six, constructing a residual error evaluation function J for realizing fault detection of the discrete networking system k And a detection threshold J th :
Step six, detecting whether the discrete networking system has faults according to the following judging standards:
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202311339682.4A CN117221075B (en) | 2023-10-16 | 2023-10-16 | Discrete networking system fault detection method based on self-adaptive event trigger mechanism |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202311339682.4A CN117221075B (en) | 2023-10-16 | 2023-10-16 | Discrete networking system fault detection method based on self-adaptive event trigger mechanism |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN117221075A CN117221075A (en) | 2023-12-12 |
CN117221075B true CN117221075B (en) | 2024-03-19 |
Family
ID=89038990
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202311339682.4A Active CN117221075B (en) | 2023-10-16 | 2023-10-16 | Discrete networking system fault detection method based on self-adaptive event trigger mechanism |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN117221075B (en) |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1752898A2 (en) * | 2001-03-08 | 2007-02-14 | California Institute Of Technology | Exception analysis for multimissions |
CN109612738A (en) * | 2018-11-15 | 2019-04-12 | 南京航空航天大学 | A kind of Distributed filtering estimation method of the gas circuit performance improvement of fanjet |
CN110161882A (en) * | 2019-06-12 | 2019-08-23 | 江南大学 | A kind of fault detection method of the networked system based on event trigger mechanism |
CN112152221A (en) * | 2020-09-16 | 2020-12-29 | 天津大学 | Load frequency control device and method suitable for information uncertain system |
CN113325822A (en) * | 2021-05-25 | 2021-08-31 | 四川大学 | Network control system fault detection method based on dynamic event trigger mechanism and sensor nonlinearity |
CN113325821A (en) * | 2021-05-25 | 2021-08-31 | 四川大学 | Network control system fault detection method based on saturation constraint and dynamic event trigger mechanism |
CN113641104A (en) * | 2021-08-23 | 2021-11-12 | 江南大学 | Limited frequency domain fault detection method for tank reactor under dynamic event triggering |
CN115225381A (en) * | 2022-07-19 | 2022-10-21 | 海南大学 | Asynchronous fault detection filter design method |
JP2023138371A (en) * | 2022-03-16 | 2023-10-02 | 広東石油化工学院 | Abnormal change prediction and failure early warning method of petrochemical process |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6625569B2 (en) * | 2001-03-08 | 2003-09-23 | California Institute Of Technology | Real-time spatio-temporal coherence estimation for autonomous mode identification and invariance tracking |
KR20050085487A (en) * | 2002-12-09 | 2005-08-29 | 허드슨 테크놀로지스, 인코포레이티드 | Method and apparatus for optimizing refrigeration systems |
US20200348662A1 (en) * | 2016-05-09 | 2020-11-05 | Strong Force Iot Portfolio 2016, Llc | Platform for facilitating development of intelligence in an industrial internet of things system |
EP4222563A1 (en) * | 2020-10-04 | 2023-08-09 | Strong Force Iot Portfolio 2016, LLC | Industrial digital twin systems and methods with echelons of executive, advisory and operations messaging and visualization |
-
2023
- 2023-10-16 CN CN202311339682.4A patent/CN117221075B/en active Active
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1752898A2 (en) * | 2001-03-08 | 2007-02-14 | California Institute Of Technology | Exception analysis for multimissions |
CN109612738A (en) * | 2018-11-15 | 2019-04-12 | 南京航空航天大学 | A kind of Distributed filtering estimation method of the gas circuit performance improvement of fanjet |
CN110161882A (en) * | 2019-06-12 | 2019-08-23 | 江南大学 | A kind of fault detection method of the networked system based on event trigger mechanism |
CN112152221A (en) * | 2020-09-16 | 2020-12-29 | 天津大学 | Load frequency control device and method suitable for information uncertain system |
CN113325822A (en) * | 2021-05-25 | 2021-08-31 | 四川大学 | Network control system fault detection method based on dynamic event trigger mechanism and sensor nonlinearity |
CN113325821A (en) * | 2021-05-25 | 2021-08-31 | 四川大学 | Network control system fault detection method based on saturation constraint and dynamic event trigger mechanism |
CN113641104A (en) * | 2021-08-23 | 2021-11-12 | 江南大学 | Limited frequency domain fault detection method for tank reactor under dynamic event triggering |
JP2023138371A (en) * | 2022-03-16 | 2023-10-02 | 広東石油化工学院 | Abnormal change prediction and failure early warning method of petrochemical process |
CN115225381A (en) * | 2022-07-19 | 2022-10-21 | 海南大学 | Asynchronous fault detection filter design method |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
不完全信息下网络化系统的鲁棒滑模控制方法研究;张红旭;哈尔滨理工大学;20211216;37-58 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN117221075A (en) | 2023-12-12 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN108667673B (en) | Nonlinear network control system fault detection method based on event trigger mechanism | |
CA2844225C (en) | Intelligent cyberphysical intrusion detection and prevention systems and methods for industrial control systems | |
CN110161882B (en) | Fault detection method of networked system based on event trigger mechanism | |
CN113741309B (en) | Dual-dynamic event trigger controller model design method based on observer | |
CN108445759B (en) | Random fault detection method for networked system under sensor saturation constraint | |
CN110531732B (en) | Random fault detection method for nonlinear networked control system | |
CN113641104A (en) | Limited frequency domain fault detection method for tank reactor under dynamic event triggering | |
CN109309593B (en) | Fault detection method of networked system based on Round-Robin protocol | |
CN113325821B (en) | Network control system fault detection method based on saturation constraint and dynamic event trigger mechanism | |
CN114721264A (en) | Industrial information physical system attack detection method based on two-stage self-encoder | |
CN116915535A (en) | Wireless communication's intelligent home systems | |
Iturbe et al. | On the feasibility of distinguishing between process disturbances and intrusions in process control systems using multivariate statistical process control | |
Li et al. | Output-feedback control under hidden Markov analog fading and redundant channels | |
Dai et al. | Performance adjustable event-triggered synchronization policies to nonlinear multiagent systems | |
CN117221075B (en) | Discrete networking system fault detection method based on self-adaptive event trigger mechanism | |
CN111542010A (en) | WSN data fusion method based on classification adaptive estimation weighting fusion algorithm | |
Wang et al. | Distributed H∞ consensus fault detection for uncertain T‐S fuzzy systems with time‐varying delays over lossy sensor networks | |
Li et al. | $ H_ {\infty} $ Filtering for Network-Based Systems With Delayed Measurements, Packet Losses, and Randomly Varying Nonlinearities | |
CN113411312A (en) | State estimation method of nonlinear complex network system based on random communication protocol | |
CN115061447B (en) | Fault detection method for high-speed aircraft temperature control system | |
CN113997317B (en) | Three-link manipulator actuator fault detection method based on event triggering mechanism | |
CN117973547B (en) | Memory fault detection method of fuzzy networking system under influence of measurement deletion | |
CN113486480A (en) | Leakage fault filtering method for urban water supply pipe network system | |
Luo et al. | Finite-Horizon Security-Guaranteed Non-Fragile H∞ Estimation Under Integral Measurements | |
CN118797527B (en) | Direct-current distribution network line fault diagnosis method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |