CA2509017A1 - Chemical cleaning for membranes - Google Patents

Abstract

Membranes, for example immersed polymeric ultrafiltration or microfiltration membranes, are cleaned by contacting them with a chemical cleaner comprising one or more of a gluconate, a hydrosulfite, a metabisulfite or an acid, for example phosphoric acid. The membranes may have been exposed to pretreatment involving adding iron or aluminum to water to be treated.
Methods for treating a waste cleaning solution were described.

Description

.. 1 -TITI-E: CHEMICAL CLEANING FOR MEMBRANES
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] This invention relates to a method for cleaning membranes, for example polymeric membranes, to compositions that may be used to clean membranes and to a method of treating water using membranes having a step of cleaning the membranes.

[0002] In US Patent No. 5,403,479 a method and cleaning system is disclosed for cleaning the outer surface of a fouled microfiltration (MF) or ultrafiltration (UF) semipermeable hollow fiber membrane after its initial stable transmembrane flux has been decreased to an unacceptably low level. The method is spECifically applicable to eny fiber used to withdraw purified water from dirty water, particularly water containing organic matter including beneficial bacteria andlvr undesirable inorganic salts, where the viability of the bacteria population is to be maintained. The membrane is cleaned by flowing a cleaning fluid, preferably a biocidal oxidative electrolyte having an oxidizing anion and an associated cation through the clean, permeate-side of the membrane, at low pressure no more than the bubble pressure breakthrough, usually X300 kPa (30 psig) for a MF or OF fiber. Such low pressure is sufficient to diffuse the electrolyte through both, the pores of the membrane and a fouling film which typically inciudes a biofilm accumulated on the fibers' outer surface, but not enough electrolyte flows Through the membrane to kill numerically more than 20% of the living bacteria in the dirty water. This limitation can be met only if the cleaning period is brief. This period is only long enough to oxidize organic matter within the pores and kill essentially all bacteria in the biofilm. Preferably less than 5% of the bacteria p4pulation is decimated. As diffusion takes place, pores are again opened, both in the wan of the fiber and through the biofilm, and when the fibers are returned to normal operation, the restored flux is equal to at least 70% of the initial stable flux.

[00031 US Patent Application Serial No. 101481,887, published as 2004-0007525 A1, discloses a method of cleaning ultrafiltration or mlerofiltration membranes that reduces the rate of decline in the permeability of the membranes so that intensive recovery cleaning is required less frequently. In one aspect, cleaning events using a chemical cleaner are started before the membranes foul significantly and are repeated betwQen 1 and 7 times per week. The product of the concentration of the chemical cleaner expressed as an equivalent ooncentration of NaOCI and the duration of all cleaning events is between 2,000 minutes~mgll and 30,000 minutes~solid-mgll per week. When performed in situ, each cleaning event comprises (a) stopping permeation and any agitation of the membranes, (b) backwashing the membranes with a chemical cleaner in repeated pulses and (c) resuming agitation, if any, and permeation. The pulses last for between 10 seconds and 100 seconds and there is a time between pulses between 50 seconds and 6 minutes. each cleaning event typically involves between 5 and pulses. In another aspect, cleaning events using a pulsed backwash of heated water are similarly started before the membranes foul significantly and are repeated between twice a day and once every two days.
[0004] US Patent No. 5,403,479 and US Patent Application Serial No.
20 101461,687 are incorporated herein in their entirety by this reference to them.
SUMMARY OF TWE INVENTION
[Oa05] The following summary is intended to introduce the reader to the invenfion but not to define it. The invention may reside in any combination of one or more apparatus features, composition elements or process steps found in any part of this document. An object of the inventipn is to improve an, or at least provide a u58ful alternative to the prior art. Other alternative objects of the invention include providing a process for cleaning membranes, fer example cleaning membranes with a chemical cleaner, providing a composition for cleaning membranes and providing a process for treating water using membranes.

[0008) In one aspect, the invention provides a composition including any soluble gluconate, for example sodium gluconate, In another aspect, the invention provides a composition comprising a hydrvsulfite, alternately called a dithionite and being generally of the formula XzSz~a, for example sodium hydrosuifite or potassium hydrasulfite, and any soluble gluconate, for example sodium glucanate or potassium gluconate. In another aspect, the invention provides 2 composition comprising phosphoric acid. In another aspect, the invention provides a composition comprising sodium metabisulfite and phosphoric acid. The composition described above may have the stated chemicals dissolved into a solvent, for example water, at Bases effective to clean membranes, for example membranes fouled with Fe or AI.
[0007) In another aspect, the invention provides a method df cleaning membranes using 8 cleaner, for example a cleaner according to any of the composition described above. The membranes may be, far example, polymeric membranes with pore sizes In the mlcro~ltration or uttraflltration ranges. The membranes may be fouled, for example and in whole or in part, by their being exposed to Fe or AI compounds in water being treated. Those compounds may exist in the water before treatment or have been added during the treatment process, for example in the form df FeCl3 or aluminum sulfate used as a coagulant. These coagulates may be used In water filtration plants producing process or potable water, or wastewater treatment plants as a means to condition the mixed liquor or sludge. The cleaning chemical may be applied to the membranes frequently, for example according to a maintenance cleaning procedure that increases permeability by 10~/a or less or is performed once a week or more frequently, or infrequently, for example according to a recovery cleaning procedure that increases membrane permeability by 20% or more pr is performed once every two weeks or less frequently. The chemical cleaner may be applied to the membranes by a variety of techniques such as soaking with the r~etentate side exposed to a volume of the cleaner, permeating the cleaner through the membranes, backwashing the cleaner through the membranes, recirculating cleaner through the membranes either in the permeating or backwashing direction, pulsing the cleaner through the membranes in either the permeating or backwashing direction, alternately flowing fresh cleaner through the membranes and purging stale cleaner from the membranes either in the same or a reversed direction, or other methods.
[D0o8~ In another aspects, the invention provides a composition Comprising phosphoric acid and any soluble gluconate, for example sodium gluconate ar potassium gluoonate. In other aspects, the invention provides each and every permutation and combination of one or more chemicals chosen from the set of: any gluconate; sodium glucanate: potassium gluconate; any metabisulbte (alternately called a bisulfate, dlsulfite or having a formula of XHS03); sodium bisulfate; potassium bisulfate; phosphoric acid;
citric acid; oxalic acid; an enhancing agent; sodium citrate; ammonium Citrate;
a chel~ting agent; HEDTA (N-(2-hydroeyethyl)ethylene diamine triacetic acid];
EDTA; Na,EDTA; EDDS; and, methanol amine.
[0009 In another aspect, the invention provides a m8mbrane treatment process comprising steps of treating water by adding a pretreatment chemical including an inorganic chemical or a coagulant, for example adding a chemical containing Fe or AI, treating the water with a membrane, for example a filtering polymeric membrane, and cleaning the membrane with a Cleaner, for example a cleaner oontalning any of the compositions mentioned above.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION (7F THE DRAWINGS
[0010 Embodiments of the invention will be described below with referonoe to the following Figures:
~oa~l~ Figures 1 to 4 show the results of Gleaning methods according to the invention using compositions according to the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
[0012a The following description describes embodiments of the invention to provide examples of tha invention. The invention is not limited to these examples.

[0013] Membrane treatment systems are described generally in US
Patent No. 5.839,373, now reissued as RE37,549, and U.S. Patent No.
6,325,928. A membrane treatment system involving the addition of s coagulant is described in ~U.S. Patent No. 6,027,649. US Patent Nos.

5.839,373; RE37,549; 6,325,928; and, 6,027,549 are incorporated herein in their entirety by this reference to them.
(00'14] Immersed, suction driven, polymeric membranes w'tth pores in the ultrafiltration or microfiltrakion range may be used to treat water. The treatment process may involve adding aluminum sulfite or another aluminum based coagulant in a pretreatment step prior to filtering the water with the membranes. The pretreatment step may be performed directly upstream of the membranes or otherwise such that the membranes are exposed to the coagulant. Membranes used in such a process may become fouled with aluminum. The fouling may be heavy, particularly if there has been an overdose of the coagulant or the coagulant has been used outside of an optimal pH range. Such fouled membranes may be cleaned by contacting them with phosphoric acid. For example, a solution of phosphoric acid in water may be prepared with a pH of 2.5 ar less. This may require adding 0.3-2,5 gIL of phosphoric acid to a supply of water which may be, for example, drinking water, process water, seed water or permeate. However, the amount of phosphoric acid required may be more or less than the amounts mentioned above depending on the alkalinity of the water being treated. Other acids, such as HCI, may be added to the solution to assist in reducing the pH or provide cleaning of other foulants. The membranes may be contacted with this solution by soaking the membranes in the solution, optionally while also circulating solution through the membranes by backwash or permeation in a loop, by a purge and refresh process as described in US Provisional Application No. 6QI6?3,763 filed April 2Z, 2005 which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by this refierence to it, by backwashing or permeating the solution through the membranes, or other methods. Figure 4 shows the result of cleaning AI fouled ZeeWeedT"' membranes with phosphoric acid white Figure 3 shows results of cleaning similarly fouled fibers with a solution of phosphoric acid and HCI.
[0015] Cleaning membranes with phosphoric acid produces a spent cleaning solution with a high phosphorous concentration. This phosphorus may be precipitated from the spent cleaning solution, allowed to settle out and removed from the spent cleaning solution. The phosphorous may be precipitated by adding lime or lime with an iron or aluminum based coagulant, for example aluminum sulfite or ferric chloride (FeCl3) to the spent chemical solution. The chemicals mentioned above may be added in sufficient amounts such that, upon removal of settled precipitates, for example by clarification, decanting, filtration, hydrocyclone or other methods, the phosphorous concentration in the waste stream is reduced to 5 mglL or less.
[0016] Membranes as described above may also be used in Systems for processes as described above with FeCI~ used as a coagulant in a pretreatment step. This can lead to iron fouling of the membranes. Such membranes may be cleaned with a mixture comprising a sulfite and a gluconate, far example sodium hydrosulfite and sodium gluconate. 'these chemicals may be mixed in water to form a solution that may be contacted to membranes by any of the methods described above, Results of tests in which iron fouled ZeeWeedT'"' hollow fiber polymeric membranes made by Zenon Environmental Inc. were cleaned by soaking in various cleaners are shown in Figure 1. As indicated in Figure 1, adding sodium glucflnate to a cleaner containing one or more sulfite reducing agents, for example between 0.5 and 2 glh of sulfite containing compounds in water, increases the efficacy of the cleaner. The sodium gluconate may be added to water at, for example, between Q.5 gIL to 2 gIL. The sodium gluconate may act as a complexing agent.
[f7017] When using sulfites, a waste cleaning solution may be created with CaD. For example, sodium metabisulfite has a GAD of 1fi5 mg OZIg and sodium hydrosulfite also has COD. The cleaning solution may therefore tend to scavenge oxygen and to create a disposal concern in some plants. To _7_ counter this problem, waste cleaning solution may be aerated, for example by placing the waste cleaning solution in an aeration tank before disposal.
Sodium gluconate is highly biodegradable and so does not provide a significant disposal problem although it may be brodegraded before disposal if desired.
[t1D98) Membranes may also be Leaned with a mixture of a sulfite reducing agent, for example, sodium metabisul~te or sodium hydrosulfite, and phosphoric acid. Cleaning with such a mixture may be used when the membranes are fouled with iron, aluminum or both. Cleaning with such a mixture may produce SOz. Results of some tests of iron fouled ZeeWeedTM
membranes using cleaners having sodium metabisulfite and phosphoric acid are provided in Figure 2. Sodium hydrosulfite or other sulfites may be used in place of the sodium metabisulfite.
[OOi9) Other acids may be used in place of or in combination with phosphoric acid in the compositions or processes described above using phosphoric acid. The other acids may Include, ar example, citric acid or oxalic acid. Figures 3 and a show the results of cleaning polymeric hollow fiber membrane fibers taken from a ZeeWeedT"" module made by Zenon Environmental Inc. used in a process with aluminum sulfite used as a coagulant in a pretreatment step. The fibers were cleaned by soaking them in various cleaning chemicals for various amounts of time. As indicated in Figures 3 and 4, a solution of phosphoric acid alone produced the largest increase in permeability, suggesting that phosphoric acrd is a strung complexin9 agent for aluminum. In comparison, while citric acid alone produced some increase in permeability, it was inadequate for cleaning the fibers tested, which were heavily fouled. However, a solution of oxalic acid was effective, as was a solution of oxalic acid and citric acid. These other acids produce less phosphorous in the waste cleaning chemical stream.
Accordingly, membranes can be cleaned with, for example, oxalic acid or a mixture comprising oxalic acid and citric acid. Further, acids or mixtures of two or more acids, for example citric acid, oxalic acid, or a mixture of citric acid -$_ and oxalic acids, may be used with phosphoric acid to produce a chemical cleaner benefiting to some extend from the efficacy Of phosphoric acid but producing less phosphorous in the waste cleaning chemical. Increases in permeability resulting from snaking of fouled fibers in phosphoric acid and mixtures of phosphoric acid and other acids is shown in Figure 4. As indicated in Figure 4, these mixtures, while using less phosphoric acid, produced satisfactory results. The effectiveness of these mixtures was less than for phosphoric acid alone but sufficient to make the cleaners useful and possibly preferred depending on the extent of fouling and regulations regarding phosphorous discharge In a particular plant.
[0020] A membrane system may also be cleaned using different chemicals at different times. For example, f8r frequent maintenance cleaning, membranes may be cleaned with a cleaner having one or more of oxalic acid, phosphoric acid, or citric acid. For example, the maintenance cleaning rnay be done with oxalic acid, phosphoric acid, a mixture of oxalic and phosphoric acid, or a mixture of oxalic, phosphoric and citric acid, optionally with other acids, for example HCI, which may assist in reducing the pH of the cleaner or in removing other foulants. For recovery cleaning, khe membranes may be cleaned with a mixture of a sulfite, for example sodium hydrosulfilte, and a gluconate, for example sodium Dr potassium gluconate. Multiple sulfites may aG~o b~ used, for example a mixture of sodium hydrosulfite, sodium metabisulfite and sodium gluconate. Enhancing agents, for example sodium citrate or ammonium citrate, may also be added, Chelatlng agents, for example HEDTA[N-(2-hydraeyethyl) ethylene diamine triacetic acid], EDTA, Na4EDTA, EDDS, or triethanolamine, may also be added.

Claims (7)

1. A composition for cleaning membranes comprising any combination of one or more of the chemicals mentioned in this document.

2. A composition for cleaning membranes comprising a hydrosulfite and a gluconate.

3. A composition for cleaning membranes comprising a metabisulfite and phosphoric acid.

4. A composition for cleaning membranes comprising phosphoric acid.

5. A process for cleaning membranes comprising the steps of contacting the membranes with a composition according to any of claims 1 to 4.

6. A process for treating water comprising the steps of adding a coagulant containing Fe or Al to the water, filtering the water through a membrane and then cleaning the membrane by contacting it with a composition according to any of claims 1-4.

7. The process of claim 5 or 6 further comprising a step of treating the composition after it has been contacted with the membranes.