SCREEN
FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to a screen for cleaning pulp suspensions.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Screens are machines used in the paper industry for the purpose of cleaning a pulp suspension consisting of water, fibers and dirt particles. In doing so, a feed flow is left on a screening device, with the acceptance current consisting of water and fibers flowing through the screen. A partial stream, called the reject stream, consisting of water, fibers and dirt particles, is generally removed from the localized end opposite the feed stream. So with a screen, a separation of particles that are suspended in a liquid takes place. On the contrary with the filtration, the liquid is separated from the solids. Generally speaking, this screen is designed in a rotationally symmetrical way and consists of a lining with a tangentially arranged feed, a cylindrical screen basket, mainly with holes or vertical grooves, and a rotating rotor. The rotor has the task of keeping the screen slots clean, and this is achieved by blades that rotate closely to the surface of the screen. The acceptance current is collected in a so-called acceptance chamber, often one of a conical design, and is drawn radially at the same point. The rejection current is directed generally to the side of the sieve basket located opposite to the feed, towards a rejection chamber, which in most cases is annular, and is extracted from the chamber tangentially. This screen is known, for example, from US-4, 268, 381. The disadvantage of these screening machines is the risk of clogging at low flow rates that occurs in the relatively large rejection chamber. Also, there is a non-uniform incoming flow to the screen basket and non-uniform conditions of flow in the acceptance chamber, especially in the area of the acceptance discharge.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Therefore, the purpose of the invention is to create an improvement of the flow conditions in the screen in order to decrease the energy used at an increased production speed and removal of dirt. Therefore, the invention is characterized by an additional screen basket that is provided in the feeding area for pre-screening. This allows to achieve better discharge in the machine. An advantageous advance of the invention is characterized by the additional screen basket that rotates together with the rotor, with the additional screen basket which is also possibly fixed. A favorable variant of the invention is characterized by rotating knives which are provided in the pre-screening area, whereby the knives can be arranged in the feed flow or in the acceptance flow. A favorable advancement of the invention is characterized by a stationary installation, which can be designed in a rotationally symmetrical manner, which is provided in the feeding area between the branch of conduit and the end of the rotor. This gives a substantial improvement in the flow conditions and as a consequence, a reduction in the amount of energy used. An advantageous advance of the invention is characterized by the installation being a cone, a truncated cone, a hemisphere, a spherical segment, a spherical segment between two parallel circles, a paraboloid, or a hyperboloid with two leaves. A favorable variant of the invention is characterized by a cone angle a which accounts for between 10 ° and 60 ° for installations designed as a cone or truncated cone, with the axis of the feeding branch which is arranged possibly in parallel to the breastplate of the cone. An alternative, favorable variant of the invention is characterized by the installation being a body of spiral shape, with the separation of the spiral which can be selected such that the speed of flow in the feeding area a constant 5 is maintained with respect to the full width of the sieve basket. An advantageous advance of the invention is characterized by the installation that is arranged concentrically. ^ 10 An advantageous variant of the invention is characterized by the acceptance chamber which is designed in a double conical shape. An advantageous variant of the invention is characterized by the screen that is designed as a double machine. A favorable advance of the invention is characterized in that the feeding takes place axially through the rotor. ^ A favorable variant of the invention is
20 characterized by the portion of the drive side rotor that is of the same height as or greater than the part of the rotor on the other side of the drive in which and through which the pulp flows. A favorable variant of the invention is characterized in that the feeding takes place centrally from the side. An advantageous advance of the invention is characterized in that two acceptance discharges are provided. An advantageous variant of the invention is characterized by the screen that is arranged horizontally. A favorable advancement of the invention is characterized by a screen basket for the pre-screening, which in turn together with the rotor, which is provided in the feeding area, with possibly rotating blades which are provided in the pre-screening area. A favorable advance of the invention is characterized by the rotor having several blades arranged at different heights and / or distributed on the circumference 15 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DIBS The invention is described later in examples and reference to the drawings, wherein Figure 1 shows a variant of the invention with a
20 section for integrated pre-screening, Figure 2 is a further variant of the invention, Figure 3 is an alternative variant of the invention, Figure 4 is a design as a double machine, Figure 5 is a diagram showing the specific energy against
25 flow in the screen plate and Figure 6 is a plot of point reduction against the flow of screen plates.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Figure 1 now shows the upper part of the screen 1 arranged vertically with an integrated pre-screening. The pulp suspension is fed to screen 1 via feed branch 2. In order to discharge heavy particles into the pre-screening area, a pre-screening area 10 is provided on the top of the screen 1, in which the suspension passes through a screen plate 11. The flow of the pulp suspension is therefore from the outside to the inside. This allows the efficient removal of particularly heavy particles and large surface contaminants, which result from dirty or very dirty pulps. There is a holding rotor 12 outside the
15 screen plate 11, that is, on the feed side, this rotor which is connected to the rotor 4 via an extension 13. In an alternative variant, the rotor may also be running inside the screen plate. The heavy particles leave the pre-screening area through the branch 14. The rotor 12 may be running in the pre-screening area 10 either in the feed flow (as shown) or in the acceptance flow, which then leads to additional fine screening in the lower area of the screen
1. If the rotor 12 runs in the inflow, then the rotating, rotating blades of the rotor 12 prevent the heavy particles from hitting and thus damaging the surface of the screen plate 11. In this way, the especially heavy parts are centrifuged outwards. This allows to achieve a longer life for the 5-screen baskets in the pre-screening area, and on the other hand, also to have a planned barrier in the form of the pre-screening basket as a consistent impediment for the parties heavy ones pass to the poscribado area, in centrifuge. This means that the
< | 10 rotors, by virtue of the fact that they rotate in the first stage acceptances, are being loaded longer at the edges of the incoming flow and therefore undergo less abrasion and energy consumption and therefore can be adjusted more closely to the surface of the screen plate 5, without causing damage to the rotor or surface of the screen plate. The separation of coarse and smaller pollutants results in increased performance (yield and increase in
"'efficiency) compared to machines
20 conventional screening. This variant can also be designed with a double cone rotor for high production speeds. The formulated construction also makes possible a better and easier sealing and better access for cleaning. Figure 2 shows a screen 1, to which a pulp suspension is fed for cleaning, through a feeding branch 2. In the area of the feeding, an installation 3 is provided, which is shown here as a truncated cone. The "upper part" of the truncated cone points towards the direction of the rotor 4. The angle of the flank a of the truncated cone gives between 10 ° and 60 ° in view of 5 the optimum deflection. The pulp suspension enters the area between the rotor 4 and the screen plate 5 and is fed to the acceptance chamber 6 through the screen plate. The lining of the acceptance chamber is designed as a double cone, that is, the lining tapers conically from near the upper edge of the acceptance outlet 7 towards the rejection chamber, with the angle of the acceptance chamber it is designed in view of a constant flow rate to a uniform discharge, assumed through the 15-screen plate. For this, the rotor 4 of the screen 1 is designed for the uniform incoming flow of the screen, which needs a lower thickening behavior along the height of the screen plate. It is formed as
20 a parabola, and this means that the axial flow velocity within the screen basket remains constant at a uniform output flow, assumed through the screen plate. As an alternative, the shape of the rotor can be approached through a form
25 conical To ensure proper discharge of the reject flow, the rejection chamber is designed such that flow rates above 2.5 m / second are achieved with or without additional introduction of agitation energy by the rotor. This virtually prevents clogging. Figure 3 shows an analogous arrangement of a screen 1, with the feeding branch 2 which is arranged such that the suspension is fed parallel to the shell 3 of the truncated cone 3. This means that the loss of energy that normally exists can be avoided. in the case of flow deviation. Figure 4 shows the design as a superior machine as it is used for high production speeds. For this, the rotor, for example, is designed as a 4, 4 'parabolic, double rotor or a double cone rotor. The reject discharge 8, 8 'and the screen basket 5, 5' are also provided twice. Here, too, the acceptance chamber 6, 6 'comes as a double cone, and this means in this case also, that the lining tapers approximately from the upper edge of the discharge 7 of the acceptance flow towards the rejection chamber. The pulp suspension is also fed via the feed branch 2 and, in the configuration shown, is routed axially through the rotor. With this type of incoming flow, the height Ll of the part 4 of the drive side rotor is equal to or greater than the height L2 of the rotor part 4 'in which and through which the flow takes place, and it is opposite to the drive side. The suspension leaves the part 4 'of the rotor, through which the flow takes place, through the openings 9 in the center and both directions are distributed. It passes through the screen basket 5, 5 'towards the acceptance chamber 6, 6', the same as for an individual screen, this acceptance chamber which is in this case also designed as a double cone. The reject flow both upwards and downwards and in this case is discharged from the machine via a rejection chamber 8, 8 '. In another configuration, the feeding can take place centrally from the side. There may be two downloads of acceptance, one at the top (7 ') and the bottom (7) or one at the center. The screening device can be designed horizontally. Figure 5 shows the diagram of the energy requirement on the step flow of the screen plate, with a curve that is shown for existing screens one for the screens according to the invention, with the conical installation in the feeding area. Figure 6 shows the reduction of points on the passage flow of the screen plate. It can be seen here that with a conical installation in the feeding area, it was also possible to improve the reduction of points in a substantial way, by reducing the specific energy consumption at the same time.