Shahbazi et al., 2020 - Google Patents
Evaluation of seismic soil–structure interaction of full-scale grouped helical piles in dense sandShahbazi et al., 2020
View PDF- Document ID
- 3654959836864777402
- Author
- Shahbazi M
- Cerato A
- El Naggar M
- Elgamal A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- International Journal of Geomechanics
External Links
Snippet
A full-scale shake table testing program was performed with two helical pile groups supporting model structures to better understand the dynamic properties of a soil–pile-group– structure system. Each group had four piles embedded in dry, dense sand confined in a 6.7 …
- 239000004576 sand 0 title abstract description 35
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D27/00—Foundations as substructures
- E02D27/32—Foundations for special purposes
- E02D27/34—Foundations for sinking or earthquake territories
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D1/00—Investigation of foundation soil in situ
- E02D1/02—Investigation of foundation soil in situ before construction work
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D33/00—Testing foundations or foundation structures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D3/00—Improving or preserving soil or rock, e.g. preserving permafrost soil
- E02D3/02—Improving by compacting
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/008—Earthquake measurement or prediction
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Karimi et al. | Seismic performance of shallow founded structures on liquefiable ground: validation of numerical simulations using centrifuge experiments | |
Rayhani et al. | Numerical modeling of seismic response of rigid foundation on soft soil | |
Rayamajhi et al. | Dense granular columns in liquefiable ground. I: Shear reinforcement and cyclic stress ratio reduction | |
Cilingir et al. | Effect of depth on seismic response of circular tunnels | |
Karray et al. | Framework to assess pseudo-static approach for seismic stability of clayey slopes | |
Chau et al. | Nonlinear seismic soil–pile–structure interactions: shaking table tests and FEM analyses | |
Phanikanth et al. | Behavior of single pile in liquefied deposits during earthquakes | |
Fatahi et al. | Three-dimensional simulation of seismic slope–foundation–structure interaction for buildings near shallow slopes | |
Shang et al. | Selection of input motion for seismic analysis of scoured pile-supported bridge with simplified models | |
Tiznado et al. | Seismic lateral movement prediction for gravity retaining walls on granular soils | |
Armstrong et al. | Liquefaction effects on piled bridge abutments: Centrifuge tests and numerical analyses | |
Zhang et al. | Assessing the impact of inertial load on the buckling behavior of piles with large slenderness ratios in liquefiable deposits | |
Shahbazi et al. | Evaluation of seismic soil–structure interaction of full-scale grouped helical piles in dense sand | |
Yamashita et al. | Seismic response analysis of piled raft with grid-form deep mixing walls under strong earthquakes with performance-based design concerns | |
Dezi et al. | Kinematic bending moments in square pile groups | |
Xie et al. | Development and validation of p‐y modeling approach for seismic response predictions of highway bridges | |
ElSawy et al. | Data Reduction and Dynamic p-y Curves of Helical Piles from Large-Scale Shake Table Tests | |
Callisto et al. | Soil–structure interaction for the seismic design of the Messina Strait Bridge | |
Hushmand et al. | Seismic performance of underground reservoir structures: insight from centrifuge modeling on the influence of backfill soil type and geometry | |
Rayhani et al. | Physical and numerical modeling of seismic soil-structure interaction in layered soils | |
Qin et al. | Impact of earthquake characteristics on seismic slope stability using modified pseudodynamic method | |
Arici et al. | Comparison of 2D versus 3D modeling approaches for the analysis of the concrete faced rock‐fill Cokal Dam | |
Keykhosropour et al. | Experimental studies of seismic soil pressures on vertical flexible, underground structures and analytical comparisons | |
Choudhury et al. | Dynamic tunnel–soil interaction in soft soils considering site-specific seismic ground response | |
Shabani et al. | Dynamic response of three-dimensional midrise buildings adjacent to slope under seismic excitation in the direction perpendicular to the slope |