Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Shideler, 1976 - Google Patents

A comparison of electronic particle counting and pipette techniques in routine mud analysis

Shideler, 1976

Document ID
3354590059246566842
Author
Shideler G
Publication year
Publication venue
Journal of Sedimentary Research

External Links

Snippet

Electronic particle counting and pipette size-analysis techniques are compared for their relative effectiveness in large-scale routine mud analysis. Optimum laboratory procedures for conducting electronic analyses with a Model TA Coulter Counter are presented …
Continue reading at pubs.geoscienceworld.org (other versions)

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N15/00Investigating characteristics of particles; Investigating permeability, pore-volume, or surface-area of porous materials
    • G01N15/02Investigating particle size or size distribution
    • G01N15/0205Investigating particle size or size distribution by optical means, e.g. by light scattering, diffraction, holography or imaging
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N15/00Investigating characteristics of particles; Investigating permeability, pore-volume, or surface-area of porous materials
    • G01N15/10Investigating individual particles
    • G01N15/14Electro-optical investigation, e.g. flow cytometers
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N15/00Investigating characteristics of particles; Investigating permeability, pore-volume, or surface-area of porous materials
    • G01N15/10Investigating individual particles
    • G01N15/12Coulter-counters
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
    • G01N33/26Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups oils; viscous liquids; paints; inks
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N15/00Investigating characteristics of particles; Investigating permeability, pore-volume, or surface-area of porous materials
    • G01N15/06Investigating concentration of particle suspensions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using infra-red, visible or ultra-violet light
    • G01N21/17Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
    • G01N21/47Scattering, i.e. diffuse reflection
    • G01N21/49Scattering, i.e. diffuse reflection within a body or fluid
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N1/00Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Shideler A comparison of electronic particle counting and pipette techniques in routine mud analysis
Bianchi et al. Measurement of the sortable silt current speed proxy using the Sedigraph 5100 and Coulter Multisizer IIe: Precision and accuracy
Warr et al. Interlaboratory standardization and calibration of day mineral crystallinity and crystallite size data
Buffle et al. Characterization of aquatic colloids and macromolecules. 2. Key role of physical structures on analytical results
Krumbein The mechanical analysis of fine-grained sediments
Schöpe et al. Response of the elastic properties of colloidal crystals to phase transitions and morphological changes
Andrenelli et al. Soil particle-size analysis up to 250 μm by X-ray granulometer: device set-up and regressions for data conversion into pipette-equivalent values
Berg Electronic size analysis of subsieve particles by flowing through a small liquid resistor
Vitton et al. Particle-size analysis of soils using laser light scattering and X-ray absorption technology
Smith Evaluation of the detectability and quantification of respirable crystalline silica by X-ray powder diffraction methods
Wales et al. Theory of coincidence in Coulter particle counters
Jones et al. A computer‐interfaced sedigraph for modal size analysis of fine‐grained sediment
Clifton et al. An investigation into the efficiency of particle size separation using Stokes’ Law
Harris Characterization of suspended matter in the Gulf of Mexico—II Particle size analysis of suspended matter from deep water
Ledin et al. Applicability of photon correlation spectroscopy for measurement of concentration and size distribution of colloids in natural waters
CA1095737A (en) Chemical analysis and mineral prospecting
Huang et al. Atmospherically transported volcanic glass in deep-sea sediments: development of a separation and counting technique
Duck Application of the qda–md method of environmental discrimination to particle size analyses of fine sediments by pipette and sedigraph methods: A comparative study
Simmons The photo-extinction method for the measurement of silt-sized particles
Karuhn et al. Studies on the Coulter counter part I. Investigation into the effect of orifice geometry and flow direction on the measurement of particle volume
Schweyer Particle Size Studies. Methods
Tysmans et al. Size and shape analysis of sedimentary grains by automated dynamic image analysis
Cramp et al. II. Data report: Interlaboratory comparison of sediment grain-sizing techniques: data from Amazon Fan upper levee complex sediments
Beirne et al. A photoelectric particle counter for use in the sieve range
Pugh et al. Particle size measurement of diatoms with inference of their properties: comparison of three techniques