Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Rasheed et al., 2020 - Google Patents

Research Article Comparative Reliability Assessment of Tooth Volume Measurement with Different Three-Dimensional Imaging Software

Rasheed et al., 2020

View PDF
Document ID
3027517613830751521
Author
Rasheed T
Al Hamdany A
Rauf A
Publication year

External Links

Snippet

Objective. To evaluate the in vivo tooth volume through VRMesh and 3Matic programs and to compare the measurements to the physical volume. So, the aim of the study was to ensure the reliability and sensitivity of the three-dimensional software (VRMesh and 3Matic) in …
Continue reading at www.academia.edu (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/02—Devices for diagnosis sequentially in different planes; Stereoscopic radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/03—Computerised tomographs
    • A61B6/032—Transmission computed tomography [CT]
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0004—Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/50—Clinical applications
    • A61B6/507—Clinical applications involving determination of haemodynamic parameters, e.g. perfusion CT
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
    • A61C9/004—Means or methods for taking digitized impressions
    • A61C9/0046—Data acquisition means or methods
    • A61C9/0053—Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C19/05—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for determining occlusion
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/58—Testing, adjusting or calibrating devices for radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/582—Calibration
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/48—Diagnostic techniques
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/14—Applications or adaptations for dentistry
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/52—Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for radiation diagnosis
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4538—Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
    • A61B5/4542—Evaluating the mouth, e.g. the jaw
    • A61B5/4547—Evaluating teeth

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Vandenberghe The digital patient–Imaging science in dentistry
Sherrard et al. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs
Liu et al. The validity of in vivo tooth volume determinations from cone-beam computed tomography
Tyndall et al. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial radiology
Fourie et al. Segmentation process significantly influences the accuracy of 3D surface models derived from cone beam computed tomography
Kau et al. Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little's Index
US9036899B2 (en) Method for quantifying local bone changes
Ahmad et al. Three dimensional quantification of mandibular bone remodeling using standard tessellation language registration based superimposition
Forst et al. Comparison of in vivo 3D cone-beam computed tomography tooth volume measurement protocols
Van Elslande et al. Accuracy of mesiodistal root angulation projected by cone-beam computed tomographic panoramic-like images
Ye et al. Integration accuracy of laser-scanned dental models into maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography images of different voxel sizes with different segmentation threshold settings
Hanke et al. 3D CT based rating of unilateral impacted canines
Mazzotta et al. From 2d to 3d: Construction of a 3d parametric model for detection of dental roots shape and position from a panoramic radiograph—a preliminary report
Al-Ubaydi et al. The validity and reliability of automatic tooth segmentation generated using artificial intelligence
Chugh et al. Comparative evaluation of three different methods for evaluating alveolar ridge dimension prior to implant placement: An: in vivo: study
Rasheed et al. Comparative Reliability Assessment of Tooth Volume Measurement with Different Three‐Dimensional Imaging Software
Porto et al. The use of three-dimensional cephalometric references in dentoskeletal symmetry diagnosis
Rastegar et al. Validation of a windowing protocol for accurate in vivo tooth segmentation using i-CAT cone beam computed tomography
Sahai Recent advances in imaging technologies in implant dentistry
Mai et al. Effects of Exposure Parameters and Voxel Size for Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography on the Image Matching Accuracy with an Optical Dental Scan Image: An In Vitro Study
Rasheed et al. Research Article Comparative Reliability Assessment of Tooth Volume Measurement with Different Three-Dimensional Imaging Software
Nimbalkar Accuracy of volumetric analysis software packages in assessment of tooth volume using CBCT
González-Martín et al. Cone beam analysis of the buccal bone associated with a dental implant: A tridimensional assessment case report.
Şakar et al. Assessment of the accuracy of orthodontic digital models in dental education
Linjawi Comparison between characteristics of maxillary right and left central incisors: a cone-beam computed tomography study