Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Doble et al., 2011 - Google Patents

The relation between Arctic sea ice surface elevation and draft: A case study using coincident AUV sonar and airborne scanning laser

Doble et al., 2011

View PDF @Full View
Document ID
2572505602426733148
Author
Doble M
Skourup H
Wadhams P
Geiger C
Publication year
Publication venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

External Links

Snippet

Data are presented from a survey by airborne scanning laser profilometer and an AUV‐ mounted, upward looking swath sonar in the spring Beaufort Sea. The air‐snow (surface elevation) and water‐ice (draft) surfaces were mapped at 1× 1 m resolution over a 300× 300 …
Continue reading at agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
    • G01V3/12—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation operating with electromagnetic waves
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/16—Receiving elements for seismic signals; Arrangements or adaptations of receiving elements
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/008—Earthquake measurement or prediction
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/38—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for water-covered areas
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
    • G01V1/30—Analysis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C21/00—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in preceding groups
    • G01C21/20—Instruments for performing navigational calculations

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Doble et al. The relation between Arctic sea ice surface elevation and draft: A case study using coincident AUV sonar and airborne scanning laser
Farrell et al. Mapping sea ice surface topography in high fidelity with ICESat‐2
Jones et al. Measurement and modeling of oil slick transport
Giles et al. Antarctic sea ice elevation from satellite radar altimetry
Cazenave et al. Sea level rise and its coastal impacts
Laxon et al. CryoSat‐2 estimates of Arctic sea ice thickness and volume
Ricker et al. Impact of snow accumulation on CryoSat‐2 range retrievals over Arctic sea ice: An observational approach with buoy data
Kwok et al. Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) over Arctic sea ice: Retrieval of freeboard
Renner et al. Evidence of Arctic sea ice thinning from direct observations
Armitage et al. Arctic sea ice freeboard from AltiKa and comparison with CryoSat‐2 and Operation IceBridge
Miles et al. Glider observations and modeling of sediment transport in H urricane S andy
King et al. Comparison of freeboard retrieval and ice thickness calculation from ALS, ASIRAS, and CryoSat‐2 in the Norwegian Arctic to field measurements made during the N‐ICE2015 expedition
Mersel et al. Estimation of river depth from remotely sensed hydraulic relationships
Kwok et al. Airborne surveys of snow depth over Arctic sea ice
Abascal et al. Calibration of a Lagrangian transport model using drifting buoys deployed during the Prestige oil spill
Hall et al. Geodetic corrections to Amazon River water level gauges using ICESat altimetry
Moiseev et al. Evaluation of radial ocean surface currents derived from Sentinel‐1 IW Doppler shift using coastal radar and Lagrangian surface drifter observations
Silvestri et al. Quantification of peat thickness and stored carbon at the landscape scale in tropical peatlands: a comparison of airborne geophysics and an empirical topographic method
Hopkinson et al. Investigating the spatial distribution of water levels in the Mackenzie Delta using airborne LiDAR
Shaw et al. Airborne radar imaging of subaqueous channel evolution in Wax Lake Delta, Louisiana, USA
Langley et al. Complex network of channels beneath an Antarctic ice shelf
Khan et al. Recurring dynamically induced thinning during 1985 to 2010 on Upernavik Isstrøm, West Greenland
Duncan et al. Determining variability in Arctic Sea Ice pressure ridge topography with ICESat‐2
Goetz et al. Quantifying uncertainties in snow depth mapping from structure from motion photogrammetry in an alpine area
Hansen et al. Monitoring the surface inflow of Atlantic Water to the Norwegian Sea using Envisat ASAR