Krishna, 2020 - Google Patents
Metrics for evaluation and screening of metal–organic frameworks for applications in mixture separationsKrishna, 2020
View PDF- Document ID
- 17955186268446024759
- Author
- Krishna R
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- ACS omega
External Links
Snippet
For mixture separations, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are of practical interest. Such separations are carried out in fixed bed adsorption devices that are commonly operated in a transient mode, utilizing the pressure swing adsorption (PSA) technology, consisting of …
- 239000000203 mixture 0 title abstract description 114
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2210/00—Purification or separation of specific gases
- C01B2210/0043—Impurity removed
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
- B01D53/02—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography
- B01D53/04—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography with stationary adsorbents
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2253/00—Adsorbents used in seperation treatment of gases and vapours
- B01D2253/20—Organic adsorbents
- B01D2253/202—Polymeric adsorbents
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Krishna | Metrics for evaluation and screening of metal–organic frameworks for applications in mixture separations | |
Zeng et al. | Cage-interconnected metal–organic framework with tailored apertures for efficient C2H6/C2H4 separation under humid conditions | |
Qazvini et al. | A robust ethane-trapping metal–organic framework with a high capacity for ethylene purification | |
Lin et al. | Molecular sieving of ethylene from ethane using a rigid metal–organic framework | |
Chen et al. | Ultramicroporous hydrogen-bonded organic framework material with a thermoregulatory gating effect for record propylene separation | |
Yang et al. | Immobilization of the polar group into an ultramicroporous metal–organic framework enabling benchmark inverse selective CO2/C2H2 separation with record C2H2 production | |
Chen et al. | Highly adsorptive separation of ethane/ethylene by an ethane-selective MOF MIL-142A | |
Chang et al. | Enhancing CH4 capture from coalbed methane through tuning van der Waals affinity within isoreticular Al-based metal–organic frameworks | |
Wu et al. | Enhancing selective adsorption in a robust pillared-layer metal–organic framework via channel methylation for the recovery of C2–C3 from natural gas | |
Zhang et al. | Hexafluorogermanate (GeFSIX) anion-functionalized hybrid ultramicroporous materials for efficiently trapping acetylene from ethylene | |
Ferreira et al. | Ionic liquid-impregnated metal–organic frameworks for CO2/CH4 separation | |
Wiersum et al. | An adsorbent performance indicator as a first step evaluation of novel sorbents for gas separations: application to metal–organic frameworks | |
Krishna et al. | How reliable is the ideal adsorbed solution theory for the estimation of mixture separation selectivities in microporous crystalline adsorbents? | |
Wu et al. | Adsorption of pure and binary CO2, CH4, and N2 gas components on activated carbon beads | |
Wu et al. | Cu-TDPAT, an rht-type dual-functional metal–organic framework offering significant potential for use in H2 and natural gas purification processes operating at high pressures | |
Herm et al. | Metal− organic frameworks as adsorbents for hydrogen purification and precombustion carbon dioxide capture | |
Zhang et al. | Low-cost and high-performance microporous metal–organic framework for separation of acetylene from Carbon dioxide | |
Wang et al. | Efficient separation of propene and propane using anion-pillared metal–organic frameworks | |
Yang et al. | Anion pillared metal–organic framework embedded with molecular rotors for size-selective capture of CO2 from CH4 and N2 | |
Bachman et al. | Enabling alternative ethylene production through its selective adsorption in the metal–organic framework Mn 2 (m-dobdc) | |
Qazvini et al. | MUF-16: A robust metal–organic framework for pre-and post-combustion carbon dioxide capture | |
Yang et al. | Propane-trapping ultramicroporous metal–organic framework in the low-pressure area toward the purification of propylene | |
Kallo et al. | Understanding CO2/CH4 separation in pristine and defective 2D MOF CuBDC nanosheets via nonequilibrium molecular dynamics | |
Hong et al. | Host–guest pore space partition in a boron imidazolate framework for ethylene separation | |
Chen et al. | A stable metal–organic framework with well‐matched pore cavity for efficient acetylene separation |