Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Gaber et al., 2017 - Google Patents

A systematic review to uncover a universal protocol for accuracy assessment of 3-dimensional virtually planned orthognathic surgery

Gaber et al., 2017

View PDF
Document ID
17634265197753165682
Author
Gaber R
Shaheen E
Falter B
Araya S
Politis C
Swennen G
Jacobs R
Publication year
Publication venue
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

External Links

Snippet

Purpose The aim of this study was to systematically review methods used for assessing the accuracy of 3-dimensional virtually planned orthognathic surgery in an attempt to reach an objective assessment protocol that could be universally used. Materials and Methods A …
Continue reading at lirias.kuleuven.be (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/34Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
    • G06F19/3437Medical simulation or modelling, e.g. simulating the evolution of medical disorders
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/30Subject of image; Context of image processing
    • G06T2207/30004Biomedical image processing
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/32Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/0002Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
    • G06T7/0012Biomedical image inspection
    • G06T7/0014Biomedical image inspection using an image reference approach
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/50Clinical applications
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/16Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans
    • A61B17/17Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires
    • A61B17/1739Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires specially adapted for particular parts of the body

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Gaber et al. A systematic review to uncover a universal protocol for accuracy assessment of 3-dimensional virtually planned orthognathic surgery
Ghoneima et al. Accuracy and reliability of landmark‐based, surface‐based and voxel‐based 3D cone‐beam computed tomography superimposition methods
Baan et al. A new 3D tool for assessing the accuracy of bimaxillary surgery: the OrthoGnathicAnalyser
Haas Jr et al. Computer-aided planning in orthognathic surgery—systematic review
Ho et al. Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: A qualitative and quantitative study
Yuan et al. Design, development and clinical validation of computer-aided surgical simulation system for streamlined orthognathic surgical planning
Lin et al. Three-dimensional computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: experience of 37 patients
Kolokitha et al. Cephalometric methods of prediction in orthognathic surgery
Engelbrecht et al. The influence of the segmentation process on 3D measurements from cone beam computed tomography-derived surface models
Hsu et al. Outcome of facial contour asymmetry after conventional two-dimensional versus computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in cleft orthognathic surgery
Chang et al. Soft tissue changes measured with three-dimensional software provides new insights for surgical predictions
Liebregts et al. Three-dimensional facial simulation in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a validation study of 100 patients
Stokbro et al. A 3-dimensional approach for analysis in orthognathic surgery—using free software for voxel-based alignment and semiautomatic measurement
Elshebiny et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue prediction in orthognathic cases using dolphin three-dimensional software
Lee et al. The 3D CT superimposition method using image fusion based on the maximum mutual information algorithm for the assessment of oral and maxillofacial surgery treatment results
Bengtsson et al. Treatment outcome in orthognathic surgery–a prospective comparison of accuracy in computer assisted two and three-dimensional prediction techniques
Ko et al. Enhanced surgical outcomes in patients with skeletal class III facial asymmetry by 3-dimensional surgical simulation
Liberton et al. Development and validation of novel three-dimensional craniofacial landmarks on cone-beam computed tomography scans
Tondin et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of virtual planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a systematic review
Roden-Johnson et al. Comparison of hand-traced and computerized cephalograms: landmark identification, measurement, and superimposition accuracy
de Britto Teixeira et al. Three-dimensional accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery
Andriola et al. Computed tomography imaging superimposition protocols to assess outcomes in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review with comprehensive recommendations
Shirota et al. CAD/CAM splint and surgical navigation allows accurate maxillary segment positioning in Le Fort I osteotomy
Xi et al. Landmark-based versus voxel-based 3-dimensional quantitative analysis of bimaxillary osteotomies: a comparative study
Pektas et al. The accuracy of computer‐assisted surgical planning in soft tissue prediction following orthognathic surgery