Gaber et al., 2017 - Google Patents
A systematic review to uncover a universal protocol for accuracy assessment of 3-dimensional virtually planned orthognathic surgeryGaber et al., 2017
View PDF- Document ID
- 17634265197753165682
- Author
- Gaber R
- Shaheen E
- Falter B
- Araya S
- Politis C
- Swennen G
- Jacobs R
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
External Links
Snippet
Purpose The aim of this study was to systematically review methods used for assessing the accuracy of 3-dimensional virtually planned orthognathic surgery in an attempt to reach an objective assessment protocol that could be universally used. Materials and Methods A …
- 238000001356 surgical procedure 0 title abstract description 75
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
- G06F19/3437—Medical simulation or modelling, e.g. simulating the evolution of medical disorders
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30004—Biomedical image processing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
- G06T7/0012—Biomedical image inspection
- G06T7/0014—Biomedical image inspection using an image reference approach
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/50—Clinical applications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/16—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans
- A61B17/17—Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires
- A61B17/1739—Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires specially adapted for particular parts of the body
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Gaber et al. | A systematic review to uncover a universal protocol for accuracy assessment of 3-dimensional virtually planned orthognathic surgery | |
Ghoneima et al. | Accuracy and reliability of landmark‐based, surface‐based and voxel‐based 3D cone‐beam computed tomography superimposition methods | |
Baan et al. | A new 3D tool for assessing the accuracy of bimaxillary surgery: the OrthoGnathicAnalyser | |
Haas Jr et al. | Computer-aided planning in orthognathic surgery—systematic review | |
Ho et al. | Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: A qualitative and quantitative study | |
Yuan et al. | Design, development and clinical validation of computer-aided surgical simulation system for streamlined orthognathic surgical planning | |
Lin et al. | Three-dimensional computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: experience of 37 patients | |
Kolokitha et al. | Cephalometric methods of prediction in orthognathic surgery | |
Engelbrecht et al. | The influence of the segmentation process on 3D measurements from cone beam computed tomography-derived surface models | |
Hsu et al. | Outcome of facial contour asymmetry after conventional two-dimensional versus computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in cleft orthognathic surgery | |
Chang et al. | Soft tissue changes measured with three-dimensional software provides new insights for surgical predictions | |
Liebregts et al. | Three-dimensional facial simulation in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a validation study of 100 patients | |
Stokbro et al. | A 3-dimensional approach for analysis in orthognathic surgery—using free software for voxel-based alignment and semiautomatic measurement | |
Elshebiny et al. | Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue prediction in orthognathic cases using dolphin three-dimensional software | |
Lee et al. | The 3D CT superimposition method using image fusion based on the maximum mutual information algorithm for the assessment of oral and maxillofacial surgery treatment results | |
Bengtsson et al. | Treatment outcome in orthognathic surgery–a prospective comparison of accuracy in computer assisted two and three-dimensional prediction techniques | |
Ko et al. | Enhanced surgical outcomes in patients with skeletal class III facial asymmetry by 3-dimensional surgical simulation | |
Liberton et al. | Development and validation of novel three-dimensional craniofacial landmarks on cone-beam computed tomography scans | |
Tondin et al. | Evaluation of the accuracy of virtual planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a systematic review | |
Roden-Johnson et al. | Comparison of hand-traced and computerized cephalograms: landmark identification, measurement, and superimposition accuracy | |
de Britto Teixeira et al. | Three-dimensional accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery | |
Andriola et al. | Computed tomography imaging superimposition protocols to assess outcomes in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review with comprehensive recommendations | |
Shirota et al. | CAD/CAM splint and surgical navigation allows accurate maxillary segment positioning in Le Fort I osteotomy | |
Xi et al. | Landmark-based versus voxel-based 3-dimensional quantitative analysis of bimaxillary osteotomies: a comparative study | |
Pektas et al. | The accuracy of computer‐assisted surgical planning in soft tissue prediction following orthognathic surgery |