Wang et al., 2013 - Google Patents
Heterogeneous rupture in the great Cascadia earthquake of 1700 inferred from coastal subsidence estimatesWang et al., 2013
View PDF- Document ID
- 17506660754137860752
- Author
- Wang P
- Engelhart S
- Wang K
- Hawkes A
- Horton B
- Nelson A
- Witter R
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
External Links
Snippet
Past earthquake rupture models used to explain paleoseismic estimates of coastal subsidence during the great AD 1700 Cascadia earthquake have assumed a uniform slip distribution along the megathrust. Here we infer heterogeneous slip for the Cascadia margin …
- 241000295126 Cascadia 0 title abstract description 39
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/60—Analysis
- G01V2210/66—Subsurface modeling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/16—Receiving elements for seismic signals; Arrangements or adaptations of receiving elements
- G01V1/18—Receiving elements, e.g. seismometer, geophone or torque detectors, for localised single point measurements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/60—Analysis
- G01V2210/61—Analysis by combining or comparing a seismic data set with other data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- G01V99/005—Geomodels or geomodelling, not related to particular measurements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
- G01V1/282—Application of seismic models, synthetic seismograms
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
- G01V1/30—Analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/008—Earthquake measurement or prediction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/60—Analysis
- G01V2210/62—Physical property of subsurface
- G01V2210/624—Reservoir parameters
- G01V2210/6248—Pore pressure
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
- G01V3/12—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation operating with electromagnetic waves
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/003—Seismic data acquisition in general, e.g. survey design
- G01V1/005—Seismic data acquisition in general, e.g. survey design with exploration systems emitting special signals, e.g. frequency swept signals, pulse sequences or slip sweep arrangements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
- G01V3/08—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation operating with magnetic or electric fields produced or modified by objects or geological structures or by detecting devices
- G01V3/083—Controlled source electromagnetic [CSEM] surveying
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
- G01V3/38—Processing data, e.g. for analysis, for interpretation, for correction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V11/00—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS prospecting or detecting by methods combining techniques covered by two or more of main groups G01V1/00 - G01V9/00
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V9/00—Prospecting or detecting by methods not provided for in groups G01V1/00 - G01V8/00
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Wang et al. | Heterogeneous rupture in the great Cascadia earthquake of 1700 inferred from coastal subsidence estimates | |
Iinuma et al. | Coseismic slip distribution of the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake (M9. 0) refined by means of seafloor geodetic data | |
Haddon et al. | Surface slip during large Owens Valley earthquakes | |
Ross et al. | Fingerprints of sea level rise on changing tides in the Chesapeake and Delaware Bays | |
Ichinose et al. | Rupture process of the 1964 Prince William Sound, Alaska, earthquake from the combined inversion of seismic, tsunami, and geodetic data | |
Gusman et al. | A methodology for near‐field tsunami inundation forecasting: Application to the 2011 Tohoku tsunami | |
Takemura et al. | Structural characteristics of the Nankai Trough shallow plate boundary inferred from shallow very low frequency earthquakes | |
Cienfuegos et al. | What can we do to forecast tsunami hazards in the near field given large epistemic uncertainty in rapid seismic source inversions? | |
Goda et al. | Variability of tsunami inundation footprints considering stochastic scenarios based on a single rupture model: application to the 2011 T ohoku earthquake | |
Iezzi et al. | Coseismic throw variation across along‐strike bends on active normal faults: Implications for displacement versus length scaling of earthquake ruptures | |
Hall et al. | A high‐resolution study of tides in the Delaware Bay: Past conditions and future scenarios | |
Drouin et al. | Deformation in the Northern Volcanic Zone of Iceland 2008–2014: An interplay of tectonic, magmatic, and glacial isostatic deformation | |
Witter et al. | Coseismic slip on the southern Cascadia megathrust implied by tsunami deposits in an Oregon lake and earthquake‐triggered marine turbidites | |
Maurer et al. | Fault coupling and potential for earthquakes on the creeping section of the central San Andreas Fault | |
Witter et al. | Little late Holocene strain accumulation and release on the Aleutian megathrust below the Shumagin Islands, Alaska | |
Vinogradov et al. | Low‐frequency variability in coastal sea level from tide gauges and altimetry | |
Nishikawa et al. | Recurring slow slip events and earthquake nucleation in the source region of the M 7 Ibaraki‐Oki earthquakes revealed by earthquake swarm and foreshock activity | |
Mudd et al. | Responses of soil‐mantled hillslopes to transient channel incision rates | |
Mahesh et al. | Fluid driven earthquakes in the Chamoli Region, Garhwal Himalaya: evidence from local earthquake tomography | |
Ganju et al. | Hindcasting of decadal‐timescale estuarine bathymetric change with a tidal‐timescale model | |
Yamashita et al. | Small repeating earthquake activity, interplate quasi‐static slip, and interplate coupling in the Hyuga‐nada, southwestern Japan subduction zone | |
Neighbors et al. | Sensitivity analysis of FEMA HAZUS earthquake model: case study from King County, Washington | |
Mulia et al. | An optimized array configuration of tsunami observation network off Southern Java, Indonesia | |
Watanabe et al. | Tsunami scenarios based on interseismic models along the Nankai trough, Japan, from seafloor and onshore geodesy | |
Bourguignon et al. | Structural heterogeneity of the midcrust adjacent to the central A lpine F ault, N ew Z ealand: Inferences from seismic tomography and seismicity between H arihari and R oss |