Hunt et al., 2000 - Google Patents
Validity of a submaximal 1-mile track jog test in predicting VO2max in fit teenagersHunt et al., 2000
- Document ID
- 16965853215110523015
- Author
- Hunt B
- George J
- Vehrs P
- Fisher A
- Fellingham G
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Pediatric Exercise Science
External Links
Snippet
The purpose of this study was to validate the ability of the 1-mile jog test to predict VO 2 max in fit teenagers. Forty-one males and 42 females performed the steady-state, submaximal jogging test on an indoor track, along with a maximal graded exercise test (GXT) on a …
- 238000002790 cross-validation 0 abstract description 5
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/22—Ergometry; Measuring muscular strength or the force of a muscular blow
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radiowaves
- A61B5/053—Measuring electrical impedance or conductance of a portion of the body
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/16—Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/48—Other medical applications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/41—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the immune or lymphatic systems
- A61B5/411—Detecting or monitoring allergy or intolerance reactions to an allergenic agent or substance
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B24/00—Electric or electronic controls for exercising apparatus of preceding groups; Controlling or monitoring of exercises, sportive games, training or athletic performances
- A63B24/0062—Monitoring athletic performances, e.g. for determining the work of a user on an exercise apparatus, the completed jogging or cycling distance
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B71/00—Games or sports accessories not covered in groups A63B1/00 - A63B69/00
- A63B71/06—Indicating or scoring devices for games or players, or for other sports activities
- A63B71/0619—Displays, user interfaces and indicating devices, specially adapted for sport equipment, e.g. display mounted on treadmills
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B23/00—Exercising apparatus specially adapted for particular parts of the body
- A63B23/035—Exercising apparatus specially adapted for particular parts of the body for limbs, i.e. upper or lower limbs, e.g. simultaneously
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B21/00—Exercising apparatus for developing or strengthening the muscles or joints of the body by working against a counterforce, with or without measuring devices
- A63B21/008—Exercising apparatus for developing or strengthening the muscles or joints of the body by working against a counterforce, with or without measuring devices using hydraulic or pneumatic force-resisters
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Sadres et al. | The effect of long-term resistance training on anthropometric measures, muscle strength, and self concept in pre-pubertal boys | |
Washburn et al. | The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): evidence for validity | |
Kohl et al. | A mail survey of physical activity habits as related to measured physical fitness | |
Woodgate et al. | Maintenance cardiac rehabilitation exercise adherence: Effects of task and self‐regulatory self‐efficacy | |
Barnett et al. | A preliminary study of the 20-m multistage shuttle run as a predictor of peak VO2 in Hong Kong Chinese students | |
McSwegin et al. | The validity of a one-mile walk test for high school age individuals | |
Vidmar et al. | The relationship between self-efficacy and exercise compliance in a cardiac population | |
Frey et al. | Physical fitness of trained runners with and without mild mental retardation | |
Sonna et al. | The prevalence of exercise-induced bronchospasm among US Army recruits and its effects on physical performance | |
George | Alternative approach to maximal exercise testing and VO2max prediction in college students | |
Kitsantas et al. | Self-efficacy, activity participation, and physical fitness of asthmatic and nonasthmatic adolescent girls | |
Laukkanen et al. | Criterion validity of a two‐kilometer walking test for predicting the maximal oxygen uptake of moderately to highly active middle‐aged adults | |
Hunt et al. | Validity of a submaximal 1-mile track jog test in predicting VO2max in fit teenagers | |
Koepp et al. | A comparison of VO2max and metabolic variables between treadmill running and treadmill skating | |
Mitchell et al. | Validation of the 15 minute balke field test for competitive, adult 5k runners: From treadmill VO2max testing to enhancing performance | |
Ward et al. | Use of Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) to prescribe exercise intensity for wheelchair-bound children and adults | |
Spackman et al. | Maximal graded exercise test protocol preferences of relatively fit college students | |
Sylva et al. | Effects of social influence and sex on rating of perceived exertion in exercising elite athletes | |
Murray et al. | Validation of a 20-minute steady-state jog as an estimate of peak oxygen uptake in adolescents | |
Huse et al. | The validity and reliability of the 12-minute swim test in male swimmers ages 13-17 | |
Evans et al. | Metabolic response to the half-mile AAHPERD functional fitness walk test in older adults | |
Metz | Predictors of 2 kilometer rowing ergometer time trial performance | |
Westby | Examination of the validity of the Tarskij VOmax prediction equation in an active male population | |
GEORGE et al. | T most accurate assessment of aerobic capacity | |
Nielson | Predicting vo2max in college-aged participants using cycle ergometry and nonexercise measures |