Kieliba et al., 2020 - Google Patents
Neurocognitive consequences of hand augmentationKieliba et al., 2020
View PDF- Document ID
- 16835554596062208750
- Author
- Kieliba P
- Clode D
- Maimon-Mor R
- Makin T
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- BioRxiv
External Links
Snippet
From hand tools to cyborgs, humans have long been fascinated by the opportunities afforded by augmenting ourselves. Here, we studied how motor augmentation with an extra robotic thumb (the Third Thumb) impacts the biological hand representation in the brains of …
- 230000003416 augmentation 0 title abstract description 82
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
- G06F19/3437—Medical simulation or modelling, e.g. simulating the evolution of medical disorders
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
- G06F3/011—Arrangements for interaction with the human body, e.g. for user immersion in virtual reality
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1116—Determining posture transitions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/36—Computer-assisted acquisition of medical data, e.g. computerised clinical trials or questionnaires
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B23/00—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes
- G09B23/28—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine
- G09B23/285—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine for injections, endoscopy, bronchoscopy, sigmoidscopy, insertion of contraceptive devices or enemas
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/0002—Remote monitoring of patients using telemetry, e.g. transmission of vital signals via a communication network
- A61B5/0004—Remote monitoring of patients using telemetry, e.g. transmission of vital signals via a communication network characterised by the type of physiological signal transmitted
- A61B5/0013—Medical image data
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/44—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the integumentary system, e.g. skin, hair or nails
- A61B5/441—Skin evaluation, e.g. for skin disorder diagnosis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/04—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
- A61B5/0476—Electroencephalography
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/48—Other medical applications
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Kieliba et al. | Robotic hand augmentation drives changes in neural body representation | |
Toet et al. | Toward enhanced teleoperation through embodiment | |
Škola et al. | Embodied VR environment facilitates motor imagery brain–computer interface training | |
Santello et al. | Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands | |
Ingram et al. | Movement related sensory feedback is not necessary for learning to execute a motor skill | |
Sengül et al. | Extending the body to virtual tools using a robotic surgical interface: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task | |
Kieliba et al. | Neurocognitive consequences of hand augmentation | |
Athanasiou et al. | Towards Rehabilitation Robotics: Off‐the‐Shelf BCI Control of Anthropomorphic Robotic Arms | |
Oblak et al. | A simulation-based approach to improve decoded neurofeedback performance | |
Shafti et al. | Playing the piano with a robotic third thumb: assessing constraints of human augmentation | |
Gandolfo et al. | Interactor's body shape does not affect visuo-motor interference effects during motor coordination | |
Engdahl et al. | Classification performance and feature space characteristics in individuals with upper limb loss using sonomyography | |
Lalitharatne et al. | Face mediated human–robot interaction for remote medical examination | |
Willett et al. | Hand knob area of motor cortex in people with tetraplegia represents the whole body in a modular way | |
Rajavenkatanarayanan et al. | Towards a robot-based multimodal framework to assess the impact of fatigue on user behavior and performance: a pilot study | |
Masiero et al. | Looking for synergies in healthy upper limb motion: a focus on the wrist | |
Avizzano et al. | Motor learning skill experiments using haptic interface capabilities | |
Camardella et al. | How many muscles? Optimal muscles set search for optimizing myocontrol performance | |
Lanillos et al. | The predictive brain in action: Involuntary actions reduce body prediction errors | |
Danziger | A reductionist approach to the analysis of learning in brain–computer interfaces | |
Heo et al. | Performance evaluation of haptically enabled sEMG | |
Torell | Evaluation of stretch reflex synergies in the upper limb using principal component analysis (PCA) | |
Shafti et al. | Learning to play the piano with the supernumerary robotic 3rd thumb | |
Vagaja et al. | Avatar embodiment prior to motor imagery training in VR does not affect the induced event-related desynchronization: a pilot study | |
Pacione et al. | Embodying animals: Body-part compatibility in mammalian, reptile and aves classes |