Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Alpak et al., 2009 - Google Patents

Stochastic history matching of a deepwater turbidite reservoir

Alpak et al., 2009

Document ID
16055844371241646475
Author
Alpak F
van Kats F
Hohl D
Publication year
Publication venue
SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference?

External Links

Snippet

A novel stochastic framework is described that facilities automatic history matching and uncertainty quantification workflows. The underlying algorithm of the framework combines Design of Experiments (DoE) and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) inference techniques …
Continue reading at onepetro.org (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
    • G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
    • G06F17/18—Complex mathematical operations for evaluating statistical data, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
    • G01V99/005—Geomodels or geomodelling, not related to particular measurements
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
    • G01V1/30—Analysis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
    • G01V1/282—Application of seismic models, synthetic seismograms
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
    • G01V2210/60—Analysis
    • G01V2210/66—Subsurface modeling
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V11/00—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS prospecting or detecting by methods combining techniques covered by two or more of main groups G01V1/00 - G01V9/00
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
White et al. Experimental design as a framework for reservoir studies
Skjervheim et al. Incorporating 4D seismic data in reservoir simulation models using ensemble Kalman filter
Zhong et al. A deep-learning-based approach for reservoir production forecast under uncertainty
Manceau et al. Combination of experimental design and joint modeling methods for quantifying the risk associated with deterministic and stochastic uncertainties-an integrated test study
Cheng et al. Field experiences with assisted and automatic history matching using streamline models
Egeland et al. Designing better decisions
Gervais et al. Probability maps of reservoir presence and sensitivity analysis in stratigraphic forward modeling
Wang et al. Predicting geological interfaces using stacking ensemble learning with multi-scale features
Brunetti et al. Hydrogeological model selection among complex spatial priors
Moghadasi et al. Petrophysical well log analysis through intelligent methods
Korjani et al. Reservoir characterization using fuzzy kriging and deep learning neural networks
Hallam et al. Multivariate imputation via chained equations for elastic well log imputation and prediction
Cheong et al. Experimental design and analysis methods for assessing volumetric uncertainties
Mohd Razak et al. Integrating deep learning and physics-based models for improved production prediction in unconventional reservoirs
Onishi et al. An efficient deep learning-based workflow incorporating a reduced physics model for subsurface imaging in unconventional reservoirs
Mohmad et al. History matching of production performance for highly faulted, multi layered, clastic oil reservoirs using artificial intelligence and data analytics: A novel approach
Alpak et al. Stochastic history matching of a deepwater turbidite reservoir
Becerra et al. Uncertainty history matching and forecasting, a field case application
Choudhary et al. Application of global optimization methods for history matching and probabilistic forecasting—case studies
Haverl et al. Integrated workflow for quantitative use of time-lapse seismic data in history matching: A North Sea field case
Srinivasan et al. Conditioning reservoir models to dynamic data-A forward modeling perspective
Chewaroungroaj et al. An evaluation of procedures to estimate uncertainty in hydrocarbon recovery predictions
Zhang et al. History matching using a hierarchical stochastic model with the ensemble Kalman filter: a field case study
Junker et al. Modern Approach to Estimation of Uncertainty of Predictions With Dynamic Reservoir Simulation—A Case Study of a German Rotliegend Gas Field
Tanaka et al. Methods for Probabilistic Uncertainty Quantification with Reliable Subsurface Assessment and Robust Decision-Making