Reddy et al., 2020 - Google Patents
Evolution of hydroforming technologies and its applications—a reviewReddy et al., 2020
- Document ID
- 1569461785958603063
- Author
- Reddy P
- Reddy B
- Ramulu P
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems
External Links
Snippet
Advanced forming technologies have been evolving at a rapid pace with the products applicability in the industrial fields of aerospace and automobile especially for the materials like aluminum and titanium alloys (light weight) and ultra-high strength steels. Innovative …
- 238000000034 method 0 abstract description 294
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
- B21D—WORKING OR PROCESSING OF SHEET METAL OR METAL TUBES, RODS OR PROFILES WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
- B21D22/00—Shaping without cutting, by stamping, spinning, or deep-drawing
- B21D22/20—Deep-drawing
- B21D22/28—Deep-drawing of cylindrical articles using consecutive dies
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Reddy et al. | Evolution of hydroforming technologies and its applications—a review | |
| Atul S et al. | A review on effect of thinning, wrinkling and spring-back on deep drawing process | |
| Imbert et al. | The effect of tool–sheet interaction on damage evolution in electromagnetic forming of aluminum alloy sheet | |
| Lee et al. | Recent developments in hydroforming technology | |
| Manoj Simha et al. | Prediction of necking in tubular hydroforming using an extended stress-based forming limit curve | |
| Takalkar et al. | Deep drawing process at the elevated temperature: A critical review and future research directions | |
| Kim et al. | Finite element modeling and analysis of warm forming of aluminum alloys—validation through comparisons with experiments and determination of a failure criterion | |
| Chen et al. | A novel method to evaluate the high strain rate formability of sheet metals under impact hydroforming | |
| Reddy et al. | Effect of heat treatment temperatures on formability of SS 304 during tube hydroforming process | |
| Ju et al. | Forming of Al 5182-O in a servo press at room and elevated temperatures | |
| Reddy et al. | An investigation on tube hydroforming process considering the effect of frictional coefficient and corner radius | |
| Panicker et al. | Improvement in material flow during nonisothermal warm deep drawing of nonheat treatable aluminum alloy sheets | |
| Marlapalle et al. | Predictions of formability parameters in tube hydroforming process | |
| Ghavam et al. | Analysis of nonisothermal deep drawing of aluminum alloy sheet with induced anisotropy and rate sensitivity at elevated temperatures | |
| Ga¨ nser et al. | Upsetting of cylinders: A comparison of two different damage indicators | |
| Khosrojerdi et al. | Experimental and numerical analysis of hydrodynamic deep drawing assisted by radial pressure at elevated temperatures | |
| Mackerle | Finite element analyses and simulations of sheet metal forming processes | |
| Marlapalle et al. | Numerical and experimental predictions of formability parameters in tube hydroforming process | |
| Basak et al. | Prediction of formability of bi-axial pre-strained dual phase steel sheets using stress-based forming limit diagram | |
| Varandi | The non-isothermal hot deep drawing of AA5083 aluminum alloy | |
| Albakri et al. | Effects of interfacial friction distribution on the superplastic forming of AA5083 | |
| Sheng et al. | Predicting sheet forming limit of aluminum alloys for cold and warm forming by developing a ductile failure criterion | |
| Fan et al. | Cladding of aluminum alloy 6061-T6 to mild steel by an electromagnetic tube bulging process: finite element modeling | |
| Barik et al. | Failure strain and fracture prediction during shock tube impact forming of AA 5052-H32 sheet | |
| Choi et al. | A study on warm hydroforming of Al and Mg sheet materials: mechanism and proper temperature conditions |