Panneerselvam et al., 2017 - Google Patents
The influence of the mandibular gonial angle on the incidence of mandibular angle fracture—A radiomorphometric studyPanneerselvam et al., 2017
- Document ID
- 15323173643934390958
- Author
- Panneerselvam E
- Prasad P
- Balasubramaniam S
- Somasundaram S
- Raja K
- Srinivasan D
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
External Links
Snippet
Purpose The aim of this radiomorphometric study was to analyze the association between the mandibular gonial angle and the risk of mandibular angle fracture. Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis of medical records and radiographs of patients treated for …
- 206010017076 Fracture 0 abstract description 77
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4538—Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
- A61B5/4542—Evaluating the mouth, e.g. the jaw
- A61B5/4547—Evaluating teeth
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/50—Clinical applications
- A61B6/505—Clinical applications involving diagnosis of bone
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
- A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
- A61C19/05—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for determining occlusion
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/48—Other medical applications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/48—Diagnostic techniques
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/58—Testing, adjusting or calibrating devices for radiation diagnosis
- A61B6/582—Calibration
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/80—Cortical plates, i.e. bone plates; Instruments for holding or positioning cortical plates, or for compressing bones attached to cortical plates
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
- G06F19/3437—Medical simulation or modelling, e.g. simulating the evolution of medical disorders
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Panneerselvam et al. | The influence of the mandibular gonial angle on the incidence of mandibular angle fracture—A radiomorphometric study | |
Abrahamsson et al. | TMD before and after correction of dentofacial deformities by orthodontic and orthognathic treatment | |
Rizkallah et al. | Evaluation of the severity of malocclusions in children affected by osteogenesis imperfecta with the peer assessment rating and discrepancy indexes | |
Yoshioka et al. | Relationship between inferior alveolar nerve canal position at mandibular second molar in patients with prognathism and possible occurrence of neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy | |
Tang et al. | Comparison of digital panoramic radiography versus cone beam computerized tomography for measuring alveolar bone | |
Shetye et al. | Midfacial morphology in adult unoperated complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients | |
Panjnoush et al. | Evaluation of morphology and anatomical measurement of nasopalatine canal using cone beam computed tomography | |
Suri et al. | Craniofacial computerized tomography analysis of the midface of patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate | |
İşman et al. | Indications for cone beam computed tomography in children and young patients in a Turkish subpopulation | |
Al AlSheikh et al. | Mandibular residual ridge height in relation to age, gender and duration of edentulism in a Saudi population: A clinical and radiographic study | |
Park et al. | Anatomic study to determine a safe surgical reference point for mandibular ramus osteotomy | |
Möhlhenrich et al. | Predicting primary stability of orthodontic mini‐implants, according to position, screw‐size, and bone quality, in the maxilla of aged patients: a cadaveric study | |
Tunis et al. | Are chin and symphysis morphology facial type–dependent? A computed tomography-based study | |
Barbera et al. | Variation in natural head position and establishing corrected head position | |
Padwa et al. | Cone beam computed tomographic analysis demonstrates a 94% radiographic success rate in 783 alveolar bone grafts | |
Muhammed et al. | Morphology, incidence of bridging, dimensions of sella turcica, and cephalometric standards in three different racial groups | |
Nilsun et al. | Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the submandibular fossa in a group of dental implant patients | |
Pereira et al. | Upper airways after mandibular advancement orthognathic surgery: a 4-year follow-up | |
Costa et al. | Comparison of distance of upper central incisor root and incisive canal in different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns and sex: A retrospective CBCT study | |
Fonseka et al. | A cone beam computed tomographic analysis of the greater palatine foramen in a cohort of Sri Lankans | |
Dos Santos et al. | Is there a correlation between airway volume and maximum constriction area location in different dentofacial deformities? | |
Al-Gunaid | Sex-related variation in the dimensions of the mandibular ramus and its relationship with lower third molar impaction | |
Aggarwal et al. | Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of the bone density of mandibular condyle in dentulous and edentulous jaws: an in vivo study | |
Chu et al. | Will different sagittal and vertical skeletal types relate the soft tissue thickness: A study in Chinese female adults | |
Wright et al. | An analysis of anterior mandibular anatomy by using cone beam computed tomography: a study of 225 mandibular images |