Humadi et al., 2020 - Google Patents
Instrumented ergonomic risk assessment using wearable inertial measurement units: Impact of joint angle conventionHumadi et al., 2020
View PDF- Document ID
- 14882397174872438509
- Author
- Humadi A
- Nazarahari M
- Ahmad R
- Rouhani H
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- IEEE Access
External Links
Snippet
The Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) is frequently used to monitor body posture for early risk prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. However, RULA measurements that are based on workers' self-report or external rater observation suffer …
- 238000005259 measurement 0 title abstract description 32
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1121—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement
- A61B5/1122—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement of movement trajectories
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1116—Determining posture transitions
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1126—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb using a particular sensing technique
- A61B5/1127—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb using a particular sensing technique using markers
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4528—Joints
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/68—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
- A61B5/6801—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be attached to or worn on the body surface
- A61B5/6813—Specially adapted to be attached to a specific body part
- A61B5/6829—Foot or ankle
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1124—Determining motor skills
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/68—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
- A61B5/6801—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be attached to or worn on the body surface
- A61B5/6802—Sensor mounted on worn items
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/1036—Measuring load distribution, e.g. podologic studies
- A61B5/1038—Measuring plantar pressure during gait
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radiowaves
- A61B5/053—Measuring electrical impedance or conductance of a portion of the body
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/48—Other medical applications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/04—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/0002—Remote monitoring of patients using telemetry, e.g. transmission of vital signals via a communication network
- A61B5/0004—Remote monitoring of patients using telemetry, e.g. transmission of vital signals via a communication network characterised by the type of physiological signal transmitted
- A61B5/0013—Medical image data
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/72—Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B2562/00—Details of sensors; Constructional details of sensor housings or probes; Accessories for sensors
- A61B2562/02—Details of sensors specially adapted for in-vivo measurements
- A61B2562/0219—Inertial sensors, e.g. accelerometers, gyroscopes, tilt switches
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Humadi et al. | Instrumented ergonomic risk assessment using wearable inertial measurement units: Impact of joint angle convention | |
Humadi et al. | In-field instrumented ergonomic risk assessment: Inertial measurement units versus Kinect V2 | |
Robert-Lachaine et al. | Validation of inertial measurement units with an optoelectronic system for whole-body motion analysis | |
Robert-Lachaine et al. | Validation of a low-cost inertial motion capture system for whole-body motion analysis | |
Saber-Sheikh et al. | Feasibility of using inertial sensors to assess human movement | |
Schall Jr et al. | A comparison of instrumentation methods to estimate thoracolumbar motion in field-based occupational studies | |
Haik et al. | Reliability and minimal detectable change of 3-dimensional scapular orientation in individuals with and without shoulder impingement | |
Adhia et al. | Validity and reliability of palpation-digitization for non-invasive kinematic measurement–a systematic review | |
Pourahmadi et al. | Kinematics of the spine during sit-to-stand movement using motion analysis systems: a systematic review of literature | |
Rahimi et al. | Capturing whole-body mobility of patients with Parkinson disease using inertial motion sensors: expected challenges and rewards | |
Cudejko et al. | Validity and reliability of accelerations and orientations measured using wearable sensors during functional activities | |
Chèze | Kinematic analysis of human movement | |
Martinez et al. | K-score: A novel scoring system to quantify fatigue-related ergonomic risk based on joint angle measurements via wearable inertial measurement units | |
Cimolin et al. | Computation of spatio-temporal parameters in level walking using a single inertial system in lean and obese adolescents | |
Lu et al. | Development of a wearable IMU system for automatically assessing lifting risk factors | |
Clément et al. | Can generic knee joint models improve the measurement of osteoarthritic knee kinematics during squatting activity? | |
Rekant et al. | Inertial measurement unit-based motion capture to replace camera-based systems for assessing gait in healthy young adults: Proceed with caution | |
Monfrini et al. | Technological Solutions for Human Movement Analysis in Obese Subjects: A Systematic Review | |
Errabity et al. | The effect of low back pain on spine kinematics: A systematic review and meta-analysis | |
Bonnechère et al. | From Kinect TM to anatomically-correct motion modelling: Preliminary results for human application. | |
Pashley et al. | Assessment of upper limb abnormalities using the Kinect: reliability, validity and detection accuracy in people living with acquired brain injury | |
Yin et al. | Flexible sensor-based biomechanical evaluation of low-back exoskeleton use in lifting | |
Turner et al. | Validation of OpenCap: A low-cost markerless motion capture system for lower-extremity kinematics during return-to-sport tasks | |
Abe et al. | Relationship Between the Results of Arm Swing Data From the OpenPose-Based Gait Analysis System and MDS-UPDRS Scores | |
Ksoll et al. | Movement coordination during functional single-leg squat tests in healthy, recreational athletes |