Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Moore et al., 2010 - Google Patents

Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task

Moore et al., 2010

Document ID
14270362614900171440
Author
Moore B
Füllgrabe C
Stone M
Publication year
Publication venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

External Links

Snippet

The benefit for speech intelligibility of extending the bandwidth of hearing aids was assessed when the target speech (sentences) and background (two talkers) were co-located or spatially separated. Also, the relative benefits of slow and fast compression were …
Continue reading at pubs.aip.org (other versions)

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2225/00—Details of deaf aids covered by H04R25/00, not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • H04R2225/43—Signal processing in hearing aids to enhance the speech intelligibility
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/50—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics
    • H04R25/505—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics using digital signal processing
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/35—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using translation techniques
    • H04R25/353—Frequency, e.g. frequency shift or compression
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/35—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using translation techniques
    • H04R25/356—Amplitude, e.g. amplitude shift or compression
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/40—Arrangements for obtaining a desired directivity characteristic
    • H04R25/407—Circuits for combining signals of a plurality of transducers
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/70—Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
    • H04S7/00—Indicating arrangements; Control arrangements, e.g. balance control
    • H04S7/30—Control circuits for electronic adaptation of the sound field
    • H04S7/305—Electronic adaptation of stereophonic audio signals to reverberation of the listening space
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/75—Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2430/00—Signal processing covered by H04R, not provided for in its groups
    • H04R2430/03—Synergistic effects of band splitting and sub-band processing
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
    • H04S2400/00—Details of stereophonic systems covered by H04S but not provided for in its groups
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
    • H04S1/00—Two-channel systems
    • H04S1/002—Non-adaptive circuits, e.g. manually adjustable or static, for enhancing the sound image or the spatial distribution

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Moore et al. Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task
Moore et al. Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss
Moore et al. Determination of preferred parameters for multichannel compression using individually fitted simulated hearing aids and paired comparisons
Moore Speech processing for the hearing-impaired: successes, failures, and implications for speech mechanisms
Levy et al. Extended high-frequency bandwidth improves speech reception in the presence of spatially separated masking speech
Bernstein et al. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
Stone et al. Tolerable hearing aid delays. I. Estimation of limits imposed by the auditory path alone using simulated hearing losses
Glyde et al. The effect of better-ear glimpsing on spatial release from masking
Wiggins et al. Dynamic-range compression affects the lateral position of sounds
Hopkins et al. Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech
Stone et al. Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multi-channel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task
Moore et al. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods
Alexander et al. Effects of WDRC release time and number of channels on output SNR and speech recognition
Wiggins et al. Linking dynamic-range compression across the ears can improve speech intelligibility in spatially separated noise
Xia et al. Effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners
Davies-Venn et al. Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss
Glyde et al. Effect of audibility on spatial release from speech-on-speech masking
Salorio-Corbetto et al. Effect of the number of amplitude-compression channels and compression speed on speech recognition by listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss
Keidser et al. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device
Vicente et al. A binaural model implementing an internal noise to predict the effect of hearing impairment on speech intelligibility in non-stationary noises
Madsen et al. Effects of wide dynamic-range compression on the perceived clarity of individual musical instruments
Fontan et al. Improving hearing-aid gains based on automatic speech recognition
Arehart et al. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality
Jensen et al. The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio
Rana et al. Effect of audibility on better-ear glimpsing as a function of frequency in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners