Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Seewald et al., 2008 - Google Patents

A comparison of manufacturer-specific prescriptive procedures for infants

Seewald et al., 2008

View PDF
Document ID
14009914582476603698
Author
Seewald R
Mills J
Bagatto M
Scollie S
Moodie S
Publication year
Publication venue
The Hearing Journal

External Links

Snippet

Early hearing detection and communication development (EHDCD) programs enable us to identify hearing loss in early infancy, making intervention by 6 months of age a reasonable goal. For infants and children fitted with hearing instruments, it is critical that the devices be …
Continue reading at scholar.archive.org (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/70Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/50Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics
    • H04R25/505Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics using digital signal processing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/30Monitoring or testing of hearing aids, e.g. functioning, settings, battery power
    • H04R25/305Self-monitoring or self-testing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2225/00Details of deaf aids covered by H04R25/00, not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • H04R2225/43Signal processing in hearing aids to enhance the speech intelligibility
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/40Arrangements for obtaining a desired directivity characteristic
    • H04R25/407Circuits for combining signals of a plurality of transducers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2430/00Signal processing covered by H04R, not provided for in its groups

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Keidser et al. NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments
Souza et al. Relating working memory to compression parameters in clinically fit hearing aids
Hopkins et al. Benefit from non-linear frequency compression hearing aids in a clinical setting: The effects of duration of experience and severity of high-frequency hearing loss
Mackersie et al. A “Goldilocks” approach to hearing aid self-fitting: Ear-canal output and speech intelligibility index
Siburt et al. Bimodal programming: A survey of current clinical practice
Brons et al. Acoustical and perceptual comparison of noise reduction and compression in hearing aids
Goehring et al. Tolerable delay for speech production and perception: Effects of hearing ability and experience with hearing aids
Urbanski et al. Toward a new evidence-based fitting paradigm for over-the-counter hearing aids
Flynn et al. Hearing performance benefits of a programmable power baha® sound processor with a directional microphone for patients with a mixed hearing loss
Vroegop et al. Comparing two hearing aid fitting algorithms for bimodal cochlear implant users
Tan et al. Perception of nonlinear distortion by hearing-impaired people
Plyler et al. Effect of hearing aid technology level and individual characteristics on listener outcome measures
Denys et al. A preliminary investigation into hearing aid fitting based on automated real-ear measurements integrated in the fitting software: test–retest reliability, matching accuracy and perceptual outcomes
Van Eeckhoutte et al. Perceptual benefits of extended bandwidth hearing aids with children: A within-subject design using clinically available hearing aids
Wolfe et al. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and non-linear frequency compression for children with mild to moderate high-frequency hearing loss
Seewald et al. A comparison of manufacturer-specific prescriptive procedures for infants
Keidser et al. Proprietary fitting algorithms compared with one another and with generic formulas
Digeser et al. Comparison of bimodal benefit for the use of DSL v5. 0 and NAL-NL2 in cochlear implant listeners
Portelli et al. Functional outcomes for speech-in-noise intelligibility of NAL-NL2 and DSL v. 5 prescriptive fitting rules in hearing aid users
Dillon What'S new from NAL in hearing aid prescriptions?
Mueller et al. Prescribing maximum hearing aid output: Differences among manufacturers found
Quar et al. The effects of manufacturer’s prefit and real-ear fitting on the predicted speech perception of children with severe to profound hearing loss
De Sousa et al. Do smartphone hearing aid apps work?
Conrad et al. Perceived occlusion and comfort in receiver-in-the-ear hearing aids
Glista et al. The effect of adaptive nonlinear frequency compression on phoneme perception