Figel et al., 2019 - Google Patents
Optimization of drivability control functions with two-stage rate limitersFigel et al., 2019
- Document ID
- 12766109160556776140
- Author
- Figel K
- Wobbe F
- Schultalbers M
- Svaricek F
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- IFAC-PapersOnLine
External Links
Snippet
Load changes in automotive drivelines may cause uncomfortable vibrations. A suitable motor torque control is able to remedy this problem. Often, a two degrees of freedom structure is used in these drivability control functions. In this structure, the desired motor …
- 238000005457 optimization 0 title abstract description 18
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/0205—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/0265—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Morato et al. | Design of a fast real-time LPV model predictive control system for semi-active suspension control of a full vehicle | |
Lagerberg et al. | Backlash estimation with application to automotive powertrains | |
Unger et al. | Application of LQ-based semi-active suspension control in a vehicle | |
Borrelli et al. | An MPC/hybrid system approach to traction control | |
Keen et al. | Bias-free identification of a linear model-predictive steering controller from measured driver steering behavior | |
Scamarcio et al. | Anti-jerk controllers for automotive applications: A review | |
Attia et al. | Simultaneous dynamic system estimation and optimal control of vehicle active suspension | |
Malekshahi et al. | Non-linear predictive control of multi-input multi-output vehicle suspension system | |
Scamarcio et al. | Comparison of anti-jerk controllers for electric vehicles with on-board motors | |
Batra et al. | Anti-jerk model predictive cruise control for connected electric vehicles with changing road conditions | |
Minh et al. | Development of anti-lock braking system (ABS) for vehicles braking | |
Liubakka et al. | Adaptive automotive speed control | |
Grotjahn et al. | Modelling and identification of car driveline dynamics for anti-jerk controller design | |
Figel et al. | Optimization of drivability control functions with two-stage rate limiters | |
Sardarmehni et al. | Optimal switching in anti-lock brake systems of ground vehicles based on approximate dynamic programming | |
Cvok et al. | An LQR approach of automatic transmission upshift control including use of off-going clutch within inertia phase | |
CN115167384B (en) | Method for adjusting the longitudinal speed of an unmanned vehicle by means of a combined control | |
Hill et al. | Genetic algorithm based design of PID and PDF controllers for velocity tracking of a high-rise building elevator | |
Nakai et al. | Application of practical observer to semi-active suspensions | |
Orki et al. | Human driving centered gain scheduling control of mixed platoons | |
Farah et al. | Generalized CRONE Sky Hook Suspension | |
Figel | Backlash models for drivability simulation | |
Hirata et al. | Final state control-based active compensation for backlash in vibration suppression of automobile powertrain | |
Wragge-Morley et al. | Supervised parameter estimation for road vehicles, mitigating powertrain induced uncertainty | |
Zhongpu et al. | Hybrid feedback control of vehicle longitudinal acceleration |