Shah et al., 2023 - Google Patents
Multi‐rate observer design and optimal control to maximize productivity of an industry‐scale fermentation processShah et al., 2023
View PDF- Document ID
- 12694201992676431321
- Author
- Shah P
- Sheriff M
- Bangi M
- Kravaris C
- Kwon J
- Botre C
- Hirota J
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- AIChE Journal
External Links
Snippet
Chemical industries focus primarily on profitable operations, resulting in growing attention and advances in the field of digital twins and optimal control algorithms. However, most industries still struggle due to a lack of physical sensors, infrequent measurements, and …
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/70—Chemoinformatics, i.e. data processing methods or systems for the retrieval, analysis, visualisation, or storage of physicochemical or structural data of chemical compounds
- G06F19/702—Chemoinformatics, i.e. data processing methods or systems for the retrieval, analysis, visualisation, or storage of physicochemical or structural data of chemical compounds for analysis and planning of chemical reactions and syntheses, e.g. synthesis design, reaction prediction, mechanism elucidation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12M—APPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
- C12M41/00—Means for regulation, monitoring, measurement or control, e.g. flow regulation
- C12M41/48—Automatic or computerized control
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Shah et al. | Multi‐rate observer design and optimal control to maximize productivity of an industry‐scale fermentation process | |
Wang et al. | Developing a computational framework to advance bioprocess scale-up | |
Udugama et al. | Digital Twin in biomanufacturing: Challenges and opportunities towards its implementation | |
Shah et al. | Deep neural network-based hybrid modeling and experimental validation for an industry-scale fermentation process: Identification of time-varying dependencies among parameters | |
Sagmeister et al. | Soft sensor assisted dynamic bioprocess control: Efficient tools for bioprocess development | |
Kiparissides et al. | ‘Closing the loop’in biological systems modeling—From the in silico to the in vitro | |
Delvigne et al. | Bioprocess scale‐up/down as integrative enabling technology: from fluid mechanics to systems biology and beyond | |
Kyriakopoulos et al. | Kinetic modeling of mammalian cell culture bioprocessing: the quest to advance biomanufacturing | |
Cinar et al. | Batch fermentation: modeling: monitoring, and control | |
Gargalo et al. | Towards the development of digital twins for the bio-manufacturing industry | |
Komives et al. | Bioreactor state estimation and control | |
Craven et al. | Process model comparison and transferability across bioreactor scales and modes of operation for a mammalian cell bioprocess | |
Noll et al. | History and evolution of modeling in biotechnology: modeling & simulation, application and hardware performance | |
Vega‐Ramon et al. | Kinetic and hybrid modeling for yeast astaxanthin production under uncertainty | |
Gomes et al. | Integrating systems analysis and control for implementing process analytical technology in bioprocess development | |
Jenzsch et al. | Generic model control of the specific growth rate in recombinant Escherichia coli cultivations | |
Huang et al. | Quantitative intracellular flux modeling and applications in biotherapeutic development and production using CHO cell cultures | |
Morchain et al. | Coupling of biokinetic and population balance models to account for biological heterogeneity in bioreactors | |
Jin et al. | Hybrid intelligent control of substrate feeding for industrial fed-batch chlortetracycline fermentation process | |
Richelle et al. | Systematic methodology for bioprocess model identification based on generalized kinetic functions | |
Duan et al. | Model reduction of aerobic bioprocess models for efficient simulation | |
Fernández et al. | Multivariable tracking control of a bioethanol process under uncertainties | |
Frahm | Seed train optimization for cell culture | |
Herold et al. | Automatic identification of structured process models based on biological phenomena detected in (fed-) batch experiments | |
Sbarciog et al. | A simple output-feedback strategy for the control of perfused mammalian cell cultures |