Unver et al., 2020 - Google Patents
A decision support system for proactive failure prevention: a case in a leading automotive companyUnver et al., 2020
View PDF- Document ID
- 12304225727542317699
- Author
- Unver B
- Kabak �
- Topcu Y
- Altinisik A
- Cavusoglu O
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of Enterprise Information Management
External Links
Snippet
Purpose In the automotive industry, the high process complexity becomes an important issue because of the increased number of product and process variants demanded by the customers. To avoid quality defects in assembly and losses in such a complex …
- 230000002265 prevention 0 title abstract description 12
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis
- G06Q10/06395—Quality analysis or management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
- G06Q30/0202—Market predictions or demand forecasting
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Farooq et al. | Cost of quality: Evaluating cost-quality trade-offs for inspection strategies of manufacturing processes | |
| Wasserman | Reliability verification, testing, and analysis in engineering design | |
| Levin | Organizational learning and the transfer of knowledge: An investigation of quality improvement | |
| Unver et al. | A decision support system for proactive failure prevention: a case in a leading automotive company | |
| Stäblein et al. | Theoretical versus actual product variety: how much customisation do customers really demand? | |
| Arnheiter et al. | The integration of lean management and Six Sigma | |
| US8732112B2 (en) | Method and system for root cause analysis and quality monitoring of system-level faults | |
| Falck et al. | Proactive assessment of basic complexity in manual assembly: development of a tool to predict and control operator-induced quality errors | |
| Falck et al. | Basic complexity criteria and their impact on manual assembly quality in actual production | |
| Falck et al. | Criteria for assessment of basic manual assembly complexity | |
| Netland et al. | Effects of a production improvement programme on global quality performance: The case of the Volvo Production System | |
| Klochkov et al. | Approaches to the improvement of quality management methods | |
| Abdullah et al. | Supplier development framework in the Malaysian automotive industry: Proton’s experience | |
| Hadi et al. | The implementation of quality function deployment (QFD) in tire industry | |
| Al‐Mishari et al. | Integrating Six‐Sigma with other reliability improvement methods in equipment reliability and maintenance applications | |
| Alalawin et al. | Forecasting vehicle's spare parts price and demand | |
| Amineh et al. | Assessment of Consumers' Satisfaction with the Automotive Product Quality. | |
| Plinta et al. | PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF THE NEW APPROACH TO FMEA METHOD ACCORDING TO AIAG AND VDA REFERENCE MANUAL. | |
| Schuh et al. | Iterative cost assessment of maintenance services | |
| Michelini et al. | Diagnostics for monitoring maintenance and quality manufacturing | |
| Darmawan et al. | Comparison between ANN and multiple linear regression models for prediction of warranty cost | |
| Altinisik et al. | Failure prediction in electrical connector assembly: a case in automotive assembly process | |
| Wagner et al. | Advanced analytics for evaluating critical joining technologies in automotive body structures and body shops | |
| Nyhuis et al. | Adaptation of logistic operating curves to one‐piece flow processes | |
| Shubenkova et al. | Ways to Improve the Efficiency of the Truck's Branded Service System. |