Cenni et al., 2014 - Google Patents
Three‐dimensional implant position and orientation after total knee replacement performed with patient‐specific instrumentation systemsCenni et al., 2014
View PDF- Document ID
- 12205622993457394324
- Author
- Cenni F
- Timoncini A
- Ensini A
- Tamarri S
- Belvedere C
- D'Angeli V
- Giannini S
- Leardini A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
External Links
Snippet
Patient‐specific instrumentation systems are entering into clinical practice in total knee replacement, but validation tests have yet to determine the accuracy of replicating computer‐ based plans during surgery. We performed a fluoroscopic analysis to assess the final …
- 210000003127 Knee 0 title abstract description 46
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/16—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans
- A61B17/17—Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires
- A61B17/1739—Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires specially adapted for particular parts of the body
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/14—Surgical saws ; Accessories therefor
- A61B17/15—Guides therefor
- A61B17/154—Guides therefor for preparing bone for knee prosthesis
- A61B17/155—Cutting femur
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4528—Joints
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/30—Joints
- A61F2/38—Joints for elbows or knees
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/14—Surgical saws ; Accessories therefor
- A61B17/15—Guides therefor
- A61B17/154—Guides therefor for preparing bone for knee prosthesis
- A61B17/157—Cutting tibia
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/04—Positioning of patients; Tiltable beds or the like
- A61B6/0492—Positioning of patients; Tiltable beds or the like using markers or indicia for aiding patient positioning
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/30—Joints
- A61F2/46—Special tools or methods for implanting or extracting artificial joints, accessories, bone grafts or substitutes, or particular adaptations therefor
- A61F2/4657—Measuring instruments used for implanting artificial joints
- A61F2002/4668—Measuring instruments used for implanting artificial joints for measuring angles
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/30—Joints
- A61F2/3094—Designing or manufacturing processes
- A61F2/30942—Designing or manufacturing processes for designing or making customized prostheses, e.g. using templates, CT or NMR scans, finite-element analysis or CAD-CAM techniques
- A61F2002/3096—Designing or manufacturing processes for designing or making customized prostheses, e.g. using templates, CT or NMR scans, finite-element analysis or CAD-CAM techniques trimmed or cut to a customised size
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Yang et al. | Clinical experience using a 3D‐printed patient‐specific instrument for medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy | |
Victor et al. | Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial | |
Heyse et al. | Improved femoral component rotation in TKA using patient-specific instrumentation | |
Bosma et al. | A cadaveric comparative study on the surgical accuracy of freehand, computer navigation, and patient‐specific instruments in joint‐preserving bone tumor resections | |
Parratte et al. | Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation | |
MacDessi et al. | A comparison of alignment using patient specific guides, computer navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty | |
Mizu-Uchi et al. | The evaluation of post-operative alignment in total knee replacement using a CT-based navigation system | |
Pfitzner et al. | Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial | |
Koch et al. | Radiographic accuracy in TKA with a CT-based patient-specific cutting block technique | |
Scholes et al. | Patient‐specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty does not match the pre‐operative plan as assessed by intra‐operative computer‐assisted navigation | |
Ensini et al. | Intra-and post-operative accuracy assessments of two different patient-specific instrumentation systems for total knee replacement | |
Okamoto et al. | Two-dimensional planning can result in internal rotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty | |
Nam et al. | Patient specific cutting guides versus an imageless, computer-assisted surgery system in total knee arthroplasty | |
Marimuthu et al. | A multi-planar CT-based comparative analysis of patient-specific cutting guides with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty | |
Kotela et al. | Patient-specific computed tomography based instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study | |
Cenni et al. | Three‐dimensional implant position and orientation after total knee replacement performed with patient‐specific instrumentation systems | |
Seon et al. | Assessing the accuracy of patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty | |
Tibesku et al. | Can CT-based patient-matched instrumentation achieve consistent rotational alignment in knee arthroplasty? | |
Xia et al. | Verification and clinical translation of a newly designed “Skywalker” robot for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective clinical study | |
Nizam et al. | Accuracy of bone resection in total knee arthroplasty using CT assisted-3D printed patient specific cutting guides | |
Amanatullah et al. | Identification of the landmark registration safe zones during total knee arthroplasty using an imageless navigation system | |
Boonen et al. | Patient-specific positioning guides for total knee arthroplasty: no significant difference between final component alignment and pre-operative digital plan except for tibial rotation | |
Twiggs et al. | Patient variation limits use of fixed references for femoral rotation component alignment in total knee arthroplasty | |
Talbot et al. | The sulcus line of the trochlear groove is more accurate than Whiteside’s line in determining femoral component rotation | |
Kwon et al. | The Effect of Femoral Cutting Guide Design Improvements for Patient‐Specific Instruments |