Lachmann et al., 2018 - Google Patents
Isolated cleft lip and palate: maxillary gap sign and palatino-maxillary diameter at 11–13 weeksLachmann et al., 2018
View PDF- Document ID
- 11376026872497845242
- Author
- Lachmann R
- Schilling U
- Brückmann D
- Weichert A
- Brückmann A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
External Links
Snippet
Objective: To evaluate the maxillary gap sign and describe markers for the first-trimester diagnosis of isolated cleft lip and palate (CLP) at 11–13 weeks. Methods: Firstly, this was a prospective assessment of 1,087 fetuses including 5 cases of isolated CLP in 2 centers …
- 206010009260 Cleft lip and palate 0 title abstract description 57
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/43—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the reproductive systems
- A61B5/4306—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the reproductive systems for evaluating the female reproductive systems, e.g. gynaecological evaluations
- A61B5/4343—Pregnancy and labour monitoring, e.g. for labour onset detection
- A61B5/435—Assessing cervix alteration or dilation
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
- A61B8/52—Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
- A61B8/5215—Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves involving processing of medical diagnostic data
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
- A61B8/08—Detecting organic movements or changes, e.g. tumours, cysts, swellings
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
- A61B8/48—Diagnostic techniques
- A61B8/483—Diagnostic techniques involving the acquisition of a 3D volume of data
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radiowaves
- A61B5/053—Measuring electrical impedance or conductance of a portion of the body
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
- A61B8/13—Tomography
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/48—Other medical applications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
- A61B8/42—Details of probe positioning or probe attachment to the patient
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
- A61B8/10—Eye inspection
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
- A61B8/46—Ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic diagnostic devices with special arrangements for interfacing with the operator or the patient
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
- A61B3/10—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/03—Detecting, measuring or recording fluid pressure within the body other than blood pressure, e.g. cerebral pressure; Measuring pressure in body tissues or organs
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Lachmann et al. | Isolated cleft lip and palate: maxillary gap sign and palatino-maxillary diameter at 11–13 weeks | |
Gallery | ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system. Part 1: performance of screening examination and indications for targeted neurosonography | |
Chaoui et al. | From nuchal translucency to intracranial translucency: towards the early detection of spina bifida | |
Gonçalves et al. | Three‐and 4‐dimensional ultrasound in obstetric practice: does it help? | |
Egle et al. | Appearance of the fetal posterior fossa at 11+ 3 to 13+ 6 gestational weeks on transabdominal ultrasound examination | |
Vos et al. | Three‐dimensional ultrasound imaging and measurement of nasal bone length, prenasal thickness and frontomaxillary facial angle in normal second‐and third‐trimester fetuses | |
Deutch et al. | Automated assessment of ovarian follicles using a novel three-dimensional ultrasound software | |
Kose et al. | A prospective study on fetal posterior cranial fossa assessment for early detection of open spina bifida at 11–13 weeks | |
Enríquez et al. | Potential pitfalls in cranial sonography | |
Johnson | Prenatal imaging for cleft lip and palate | |
Chan et al. | Volumetric (3D) imaging reduces inter‐and intraobserver variation of fetal biometry measurements | |
Abele et al. | Effect of deviation from the mid‐sagittal plane on the measurement of fetal nuchal translucency | |
Paul et al. | Measurement of fetal nuchal translucency thickness by three‐dimensional ultrasound | |
Frisova et al. | 3-D volume assessment of the corpus callosum and cerebellar vermis using various volume acquisition and post-processing protocols | |
Chen et al. | Placental volume measured by three‐dimensional ultrasound in the prediction of fetal α0‐thalassemia: a preliminary report | |
De Biasio et al. | Ossification timing of sacral vertebrae by ultrasound in the mid‐second trimester of pregnancy | |
Simcox et al. | Intraexaminer and Interexaminer variability in 3D fetal volume measurements during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy | |
Feldman et al. | Prenatal ultrasound charts of orbital total axial length measurement (TAL): a valuable data for correct fetal eye malformation assessment | |
Bergann et al. | Mid‐facial anthropometry in second‐trimester fetuses with trisomy 21: a three‐dimensional ultrasound study | |
Tamsel et al. | Ultrasound evaluation of fetal chromosome disorders | |
ER et al. | Evaluation of the fourth ventricle and nomogram of intracranial translucency at 11–13 weeks of gestation | |
Li et al. | Comparison of traditional 2D and 3D Omniview technique in detection of fetus corpus callosum | |
Shipp et al. | Is 3‐dimensional volume sonography an effective alternative method to the standard 2‐dimensional technique of measuring the nuchal translucency? | |
Hermann et al. | Maxillary length in 11‐to 26‐week‐old normal fetuses studied by 3D ultrasound | |
Pietersma et al. | P05. 09: Virtual reality and feasibility and efficacy of first trimester ultrasound: a randomised controlled trial (VR FETUS study). |