Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Tucker et al., 2010 - Google Patents

Comparison of actual surgical outcomes and 3-dimensional surgical simulations

Tucker et al., 2010

View HTML
Document ID
10851395981937248403
Author
Tucker S
Cevidanes L
Styner M
Kim H
Reyes M
Proffit W
Turvey T
Publication year
Publication venue
Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery

External Links

Snippet

PURPOSE: The advent of imaging software programs has proved to be useful for diagnosis, treatment planning, and outcome measurement, but precision of 3-dimensional (3D) surgical simulation still needs to be tested. This study was conducted to determine whether the virtual …
Continue reading at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
    • G06F19/3437—Medical simulation or modelling, e.g. simulating the evolution of medical disorders
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4528—Joints
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
    • A61B5/1121—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/02—Devices for diagnosis sequentially in different planes; Stereoscopic radiation diagnosis
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/50—Clinical applications
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/48—Diagnostic techniques
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Tucker et al. Comparison of actual surgical outcomes and 3-dimensional surgical simulations
Lin et al. Three-dimensional computer-assisted surgical simulation and intraoperative navigation in orthognathic surgery: a literature review
Cevidanes et al. Three-dimensional surgical simulation
Xia et al. Accuracy of the computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) system in the treatment of patients with complex craniomaxillofacial deformity: a pilot study
Zinser et al. Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: waferless maxillary positioning, versatility, and accuracy of an image-guided visualisation display
Lagravère et al. Proposed reference point for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with cone-beam computerized tomography
Haas Jr et al. Computer-aided planning in orthognathic surgery—systematic review
Bianchi et al. Facial soft tissue esthetic predictions: validation in craniomaxillofacial surgery with cone beam computed tomography data
Cevidanes et al. Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetry through cone-beam computerized tomography
Chapuis et al. A new system for computer-aided preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation during corrective jaw surgery
Centenero et al. 3D planning in orthognathic surgery: CAD/CAM surgical splints and prediction of the soft and hard tissues results–our experience in 16 cases
Yu et al. Navigation-guided reduction and orbital floor reconstruction in the treatment of zygomatic-orbital-maxillary complex fractures
Mao et al. Clinical application of computer-designed polystyrene models in complex severe spinal deformities: a pilot study
Rückschloß et al. Accuracy of patient-specific implants and additive-manufactured surgical splints in orthognathic surgery—A three-dimensional retrospective study
Nadjmi et al. Virtual occlusion in planning orthognathic surgical procedures
Bengtsson et al. Treatment outcome in orthognathic surgery–a prospective comparison of accuracy in computer assisted two and three-dimensional prediction techniques
Park et al. 3-Dimensional cone-beam computed tomography superimposition: a review
Gupta et al. Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images
Li et al. Clinical feasibility and efficacy of using virtual surgical planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery without intermediate splint
Primo et al. Accuracy assessment of prototypes produced using multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography
Dérand et al. Virtual bending of mandibular reconstruction plates using a computer-aided design
von Wilmowsky et al. A new, highly precise measurement technology for the in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of digital imaging data
Zachow Computational planning in facial surgery
Kim et al. An integrated orthognathic surgery system for virtual planning and image-guided transfer without intermediate splint
Shirota et al. CAD/CAM splint and surgical navigation allows accurate maxillary segment positioning in Le Fort I osteotomy