Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Aspin, 1993 - Google Patents

Report on the bottom-up review

Aspin, 1993

View HTML
Document ID
9940872259619131265
Author
Aspin L
Publication year

External Links

Snippet

In March 1993, Secretary of Defense Aspin initiated a comprehensive review of the nation's defense strategy, force structure, modernization, infrastructure, and foundations. He felt that a department-wide review needed to be conducted" from the bottom up" because of the …
Continue reading at books.google.com (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H5/00Armour; Armour plates
    • F41H5/02Plate construction
    • F41H5/04Plate construction composed of more than one layer
    • F41H5/0442Layered armour containing metal
    • F41H5/045Layered armour containing metal all the layers being metal layers
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H11/00Defence installations; Defence devices
    • F41H11/02Anti-aircraft or anti-guided missile or anti-torpedo defence installations or systems
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42BEXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B12/00Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
    • F42B12/02Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
    • F42B12/20Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type
    • F42B12/22Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type with fragmentation-hull construction
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42BEXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B12/00Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
    • F42B12/02Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
    • F42B12/36Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling; for transmitting information
    • F42B12/56Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling; for transmitting information for dispensing discrete solid bodies
    • F42B12/58Cluster or cargo ammunition, i.e. projectiles containing one or more submissiles
    • F42B12/60Cluster or cargo ammunition, i.e. projectiles containing one or more submissiles the submissiles being ejected radially
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H7/00Armoured or armed vehicles
    • F41H7/02Land vehicles with enclosing armour, e.g. tanks
    • F41H7/04Armour construction
    • F41H7/042Floors or base plates for increased land mine protection

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Aspin Report on the bottom-up review
Cordesman et al. The Lessons of Modern War: Volume I: the Arab-Israeli Conflicts, 1973-1989
Krepinevich et al. Meeting the anti-access and area denial challenge
Cordesman et al. Iran's military forces and warfighting capabilities: the threat in the Northern Gulf
Barrie et al. Defending Europe: scenario-based capability requirements for NATO’s European members
Frederick et al. Assessing Russian reactions to US and NATO posture enhancements
Cordesman Iran's rocket and missile forces and strategic options
Lee et al. Korea net assessment: Politicized security and unchanging strategic realities
Goure The measure of a superpower: A two major regional contingency military for the 21st century
Huiss Proliferation of Precision Strike: Issues for Congress
Cordesman et al. The Gulf Military Balance: The Conventional and Asymmetric Dimensions
Bonds et al. America's Strategy-Resource Mismatch
Krepinevich Operation Iraqi Freedom: A first-blush assessment
Colby Testimony Before the Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing on Implementation of the National Defense Strategy
Cordesman et al. Israel and Syria: The Military Balance and Prospects of War
Greenway et al. A Conservative Defense Budget for Fiscal Year 2025
Dorman et al. The Changing Face of Military Power: Joint Warfare in an Expeditionary Era
Ochmanek et al. US Military Capabilities and Forces for a Dangerous World
Yaffa Arming Ukraine.
Cordesman Gulf and Iran's Capability for Asymmetric Warfare
Cordesman Iraq's military capabilities in 2002: a dynamic net assessment
Gunzinger et al. Building a force that wins
Eaglen et al. CONVENTIONAL DETERRENCE AND TAIWAN’S INDEPENDENCE NECESSARY INVESTMENTS
Cordesman The Uses and Abuses of Military Power in the Middle East
Hayes et al. The Future of the US-ROK Alliance