Aspin, 1993 - Google Patents
Report on the bottom-up reviewAspin, 1993
View HTML- Document ID
- 9940872259619131265
- Author
- Aspin L
- Publication year
External Links
Snippet
In March 1993, Secretary of Defense Aspin initiated a comprehensive review of the nation's defense strategy, force structure, modernization, infrastructure, and foundations. He felt that a department-wide review needed to be conducted" from the bottom up" because of the …
- 238000004458 analytical method 0 abstract description 14
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H5/00—Armour; Armour plates
- F41H5/02—Plate construction
- F41H5/04—Plate construction composed of more than one layer
- F41H5/0442—Layered armour containing metal
- F41H5/045—Layered armour containing metal all the layers being metal layers
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H11/00—Defence installations; Defence devices
- F41H11/02—Anti-aircraft or anti-guided missile or anti-torpedo defence installations or systems
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
- F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
- F42B12/20—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type
- F42B12/22—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type with fragmentation-hull construction
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
- F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
- F42B12/36—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling; for transmitting information
- F42B12/56—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling; for transmitting information for dispensing discrete solid bodies
- F42B12/58—Cluster or cargo ammunition, i.e. projectiles containing one or more submissiles
- F42B12/60—Cluster or cargo ammunition, i.e. projectiles containing one or more submissiles the submissiles being ejected radially
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING ENGINES OR PUMPS
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H7/00—Armoured or armed vehicles
- F41H7/02—Land vehicles with enclosing armour, e.g. tanks
- F41H7/04—Armour construction
- F41H7/042—Floors or base plates for increased land mine protection
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Aspin | Report on the bottom-up review | |
Cordesman et al. | The Lessons of Modern War: Volume I: the Arab-Israeli Conflicts, 1973-1989 | |
Krepinevich et al. | Meeting the anti-access and area denial challenge | |
Cordesman et al. | Iran's military forces and warfighting capabilities: the threat in the Northern Gulf | |
Barrie et al. | Defending Europe: scenario-based capability requirements for NATO’s European members | |
Frederick et al. | Assessing Russian reactions to US and NATO posture enhancements | |
Cordesman | Iran's rocket and missile forces and strategic options | |
Lee et al. | Korea net assessment: Politicized security and unchanging strategic realities | |
Goure | The measure of a superpower: A two major regional contingency military for the 21st century | |
Huiss | Proliferation of Precision Strike: Issues for Congress | |
Cordesman et al. | The Gulf Military Balance: The Conventional and Asymmetric Dimensions | |
Bonds et al. | America's Strategy-Resource Mismatch | |
Krepinevich | Operation Iraqi Freedom: A first-blush assessment | |
Colby | Testimony Before the Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing on Implementation of the National Defense Strategy | |
Cordesman et al. | Israel and Syria: The Military Balance and Prospects of War | |
Greenway et al. | A Conservative Defense Budget for Fiscal Year 2025 | |
Dorman et al. | The Changing Face of Military Power: Joint Warfare in an Expeditionary Era | |
Ochmanek et al. | US Military Capabilities and Forces for a Dangerous World | |
Yaffa | Arming Ukraine. | |
Cordesman | Gulf and Iran's Capability for Asymmetric Warfare | |
Cordesman | Iraq's military capabilities in 2002: a dynamic net assessment | |
Gunzinger et al. | Building a force that wins | |
Eaglen et al. | CONVENTIONAL DETERRENCE AND TAIWAN’S INDEPENDENCE NECESSARY INVESTMENTS | |
Cordesman | The Uses and Abuses of Military Power in the Middle East | |
Hayes et al. | The Future of the US-ROK Alliance |