Liu et al., 2019 - Google Patents
Separation and prioritization of uncertainty sources in a raster based flood inundation model using hierarchical Bayesian model averagingLiu et al., 2019
View PDF- Document ID
- 9520740684927475174
- Author
- Liu Z
- Merwade V
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of Hydrology
External Links
Snippet
Uncertainty in a hydrodynamic model originates from input data, model structure and parameters. In order to provide the robust model predictions, the Bayesian model averaging (BMA) approach could be used as a multi-model combining method to account for the …
- 238000000926 separation method 0 title description 3
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
- G06Q30/0202—Market predictions or demand forecasting
- G06Q30/0204—Market segmentation
- G06Q30/0205—Location or geographical consideration
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
- G06Q30/0202—Market predictions or demand forecasting
- G06Q30/0203—Market surveys or market polls
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
- G06Q30/0278—Product appraisal
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
- G06Q30/0201—Market data gathering, market analysis or market modelling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
- G06F17/18—Complex mathematical operations for evaluating statistical data, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/04—Forecasting or optimisation, e.g. linear programming, "travelling salesman problem" or "cutting stock problem"
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/06—Investment, e.g. financial instruments, portfolio management or fund management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Liu et al. | Separation and prioritization of uncertainty sources in a raster based flood inundation model using hierarchical Bayesian model averaging | |
Liu et al. | Accounting for model structure, parameter and input forcing uncertainty in flood inundation modeling using Bayesian model averaging | |
Chu et al. | An ANN-based emulation modelling framework for flood inundation modelling: Application, challenges and future directions | |
Aawar et al. | Assessment of climate change impacts on streamflow through hydrological model using SWAT model: a case study of Afghanistan | |
Steinschneider et al. | The integrated effects of climate and hydrologic uncertainty on future flood risk assessments | |
Jung et al. | Uncertainty quantification in flood inundation mapping using generalized likelihood uncertainty estimate and sensitivity analysis | |
Mohammed et al. | Extreme flows and water availability of the Brahmaputra River under 1.5 and 2 C global warming scenarios | |
Ajaaj et al. | Comparison of BIAS correction techniques for GPCC rainfall data in semi-arid climate | |
Han et al. | Bayesian uncertainty analysis in hydrological modeling associated with watershed subdivision level: a case study of SLURP model applied to the Xiangxi River watershed, China | |
Nourali et al. | Effect of formal and informal likelihood functions on uncertainty assessment in a single event rainfall-runoff model | |
Boluwade et al. | Towards validation of the Canadian precipitation analysis (CaPA) for hydrologic modeling applications in the Canadian Prairies | |
Shahid et al. | Predicting peak flows in real time through event based hydrologic modeling for a trans-boundary river catchment | |
Biru et al. | Calibration and validation of SWAT model using stream flow and sediment load for Mojo watershed, Ethiopia | |
Chaudhuri et al. | InundatEd-v1. 0: A height above nearest drainage (HAND)-based flood risk modeling system using a discrete global grid system | |
Dhote et al. | Evaluating topography-based approaches for fast floodplain mapping in data-scarce complex-terrain regions: Findings from a Himalayan basin | |
Hassanzadeh et al. | Toward a combined Bayesian frameworks to quantify parameter uncertainty in a large mountainous catchment with high spatial variability | |
Mirzaei et al. | Model calibration and uncertainty analysis of runoff in the Zayanderood River basin using generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method | |
Waheed et al. | Variable infiltration-capacity model sensitivity, parameter uncertainty, and data augmentation for the Diyala River Basin in Iraq | |
Choudhary et al. | Effect of root zone soil moisture on the SWAT model simulation of surface and subsurface hydrological fluxes | |
Bomhof et al. | Comparing single and multi-objective hydrologic model calibration considering reservoir inflow and streamflow observations | |
Huang et al. | Uncertainty analysis and quantification in flood insurance rate maps using Bayesian model averaging and hierarchical BMA | |
Bredesen et al. | Comparison of hydrologic model performance statistics using rain gauge and NEXRAD precipitation input at different watershed spatial scales and rainfall return frequencies for the Upper St. Johns River, Florida USA | |
Döll et al. | Leveraging multi-variable observations to reduce and quantify the output uncertainty of a global hydrological model: evaluation of three ensemble-based approaches for the Mississippi River basin | |
Aziz et al. | Assessment of changes in return levels of historical and projected high and low flows of upper Euphrates basin in Turkey using nonstationary models | |
Das et al. | Evaluation of the sensitivity of hydraulic model parameters, boundary conditions and digital elevation models on ice-jam flood delineation |