Gibbons et al., 2019 - Google Patents
Cost-effectiveness analysis of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in the United StatesGibbons et al., 2019
View HTML- Document ID
- 9528790366356955183
- Author
- Gibbons A
- Leung E
- Yoo S
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Ophthalmology
External Links
Snippet
Purpose To determine the cost-effectiveness of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) compared with Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in the United States. Design Cost-effectiveness analysis in a surgical …
- 230000003511 endothelial 0 title abstract description 81
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
- G06F19/3437—Medical simulation or modelling, e.g. simulating the evolution of medical disorders
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
- G06F19/345—Medical expert systems, neural networks or other automated diagnosis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F9/00—Method or devices for treatment of the eyes; Devices for putting-in contact lenses; Devices to correct squinting; Apparatus to guide the blind; Protective devices for the eyes, carried on the body or in the hand
- A61F9/007—Methods or devices for eye surgery
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
- A61B3/0016—Operational features thereof
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/22—Health care, e.g. hospitals; Social work
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Lundström et al. | Risk factors for refractive error after cataract surgery: analysis of 282 811 cataract extractions reported to the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for cataract and refractive surgery | |
Ciolino et al. | Retention of the Boston keratoprosthesis type 1: multicenter study results | |
Gibbons et al. | Cost-effectiveness analysis of Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty in the United States | |
Ti et al. | A 5-year audit of cataract surgery outcomes after posterior capsule rupture and risk factors affecting visual acuity | |
Rutar et al. | Risk factors for intraoperative complications in resident-performed phacoemulsification surgery | |
Yanyali et al. | Corneal topographic changes after transconjunctival (25-gauge) sutureless vitrectomy | |
Barsam et al. | Excimer laser refractive surgery versus phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of moderate to high myopia | |
Jones et al. | Indications and outcomes of intraocular lens exchange during a recent 5-year period | |
Day et al. | Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery (FACT): a randomized noninferiority trial | |
Ferrer-Blasco et al. | Prevalence of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery | |
George et al. | Comparison of endothelial cell loss and surgically induced astigmatism following conventional extracapsular cataract surgery, manual small-incision surgery and phacoemulsification | |
Papakostas et al. | Prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem as treatment for ocular surface disease in patients with a history of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis | |
Baharozian et al. | A novel nomogram for the treatment of astigmatism with femtosecond-laser arcuate incisions at the time of cataract surgery | |
Valdés-Mas et al. | A new approach based on Machine Learning for predicting corneal curvature (K1) and astigmatism in patients with keratoconus after intracorneal ring implantation | |
Onakpoya et al. | Childhood eye diseases in southwestern Nigeria: a tertiary hospital study | |
Ernest et al. | Minimizing surgically induced astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery using a square posterior limbal incision | |
Cueto et al. | Long‐Term Follow‐Up of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments in Paracentral Keratoconus with Coincident Corneal Keratometric, Comatic, and Refractive Axes: Stability of the Procedure | |
Statham et al. | Comparison of the AcrySof SA60 spherical intraocular lens and the AcrySof Toric SN60T3 intraocular lens outcomes in patients with low amounts of corneal astigmatism | |
US20180296320A1 (en) | Forecasting cataract surgery effectiveness | |
Shenoy et al. | Complications and visual outcomes after secondary intraocular lens implantation in children | |
Schallhorn et al. | The role of the mesopic pupil on patient-reported outcomes in young patients with myopia 1 month after wavefront-guided LASIK | |
Mol et al. | Toric intraocular lenses for correction of astigmatism in keratoconus and after corneal surgery | |
Schallhorn et al. | Refractive lens exchange in younger and older presbyopes: comparison of complication rates, 3 months clinical and patient-reported outcomes | |
Perez et al. | Impact of total pars plana vitrectomy on postoperative complications in aphakic, snap-on, type 1 Boston keratoprosthesis | |
Michalska-Małecka et al. | Results of cataract surgery in the very elderly population |