Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Wear, 1966 - Google Patents

ON THE CALCULATION OF T-SCORES

Wear, 1966

Document ID
9502784903014080859
Author
Wear C
Publication year
Publication venue
Physical Educator

External Links

Snippet

ON THE CALCULATION OF T-SCORES ON THE CALCULATION OF T-SCORES Full Text ON THE CALCULATIONS OF T-SCORES CL Wear AS FIRST DEVELOPED and used by McCallP T-scores were defined as nornalized transforma- tions of achievement scores. Since that time …
Continue reading at search.proquest.com (other versions)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Rubinstein Explanation and mere description: A metascientific examination of certain aspects of the psychoanalytic theory of motivation.
Curti Child psychology
Ray An introduction to experimental design.
Fisher The design of experiments
Burdock et al. A new view of interobserver agreement.
Sklare Intermarriage and the Jewish future
Baughman et al. Personality: A behavioral science.
Wear ON THE CALCULATION OF T-SCORES
Rosenbaum et al. The intensive group experience: A guide.
Uhrbrock 2000 Scaled items.
Bartley Beginning experimental psychology.
McDonald Remarks on correlation methods in geophysics
Meredith Some attributive dimensions of reversibility phenomena and their relationship to rigidity and anxiety.
DE1062074B (en) Multi-way valve with three connections
Patterson et al. Behavioral patterns of occupational therapy students on the FIRO-B.
Rosenfeld et al. Incompetence in school psychology: The case of" Dr. Gestalt."
Thompson Crossroads
GB563318A (en) Improvements in drawing instruments
Woodworth Four varieties of behaviorism.
Grant et al. Note on the integrals of products of associated Legendre functions
Gregory Human ecology and the drug scene.
Kawaryu et al. A Study on Learning How to Use the English Preposition ON by Applying Cognitive Approaches to Japanese Learners
Garai Istoriko-materialisticheskiĭ podkhod k probleme spetsificheski chelovechiskikh potrebnostĕi.
Boyd A nomogram for the “Student”-Fisher t test
Johnson et al. Multiple comparisons and error rate.