Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Papenheim et al., 2016 - Google Patents

Reducing the risk of failure with flexible composite stamps

Papenheim et al., 2016

Document ID
7425100782277180215
Author
Papenheim M
Eidemüller W
Wang S
Steinberg C
Scheer H
Publication year
Publication venue
Microelectronic Engineering

External Links

Snippet

Flexible composite stamps are interesting for thermal nanoimprint as well as for UV-assisted nanoimprint as they provide conformal contact to a substrate without the need of applying high pressure. However, they are also prone to bending when handled during mounting …
Continue reading at www.sciencedirect.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/70Exposure apparatus for microlithography
    • G03F7/70216Systems for imaging mask onto workpiece
    • G03F7/70258Projection system adjustment, alignment during assembly of projection system
    • G03F7/70266Adaptive optics, e.g. deformable optical elements for wavefront control

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Chung et al. Quantifying residual stress in nanoscale thin polymer films via surface wrinkling
Verschuuren et al. Large area nanoimprint by substrate conformal imprint lithography (SCIL)
Hui et al. Constraints on microcontact printing imposed by stamp deformation
Papenheim et al. Reducing the risk of failure with flexible composite stamps
CN110461764A (en) Thin-film material transfer method
Banks‐Sills et al. A Methodology for Accurately Measuring Mechanical Properties on the Micro‐Scale
Gutruf et al. Mechanically tunable high refractive-index contrast TiO2-PDMS gratings
US10139295B2 (en) Methods for in-plane strain measurement of a substrate
Petrzelka et al. Static load-displacement behavior of PDMS microfeatures for soft lithography
Son et al. Tensile properties and fatigue crack growth in LIGA nickel MEMS structures
Michon et al. 3D integrated photonics platform with deterministic geometry control
Davis et al. Wrinkle morphologies with two distinct wavelengths
CN118315306A (en) Process induced displacement characterization during semiconductor production
JP5848109B2 (en) Resin cure shrinkage measurement method
Reynolds et al. Variation of thermal and mechanical properties of KMPR due to processing parameters
Prieto-López et al. Using microfluidics to control soft adhesion
Jelinek et al. Nanoscale printed tunable specimen geometry enables high-throughput miniaturized fracture testing
Shiba et al. Visualization of Flow‐Induced Strain Using Structural Color in Channel‐Free Polydimethylsiloxane Devices
Taudt et al. Two-dimensional low-coherence interferometry for the characterization of nanometer wafer topographies
Araromi et al. Thin-film dielectric elastomer sensors to measure the contraction force of smooth muscle cells
Barink et al. Flexible electronics: Prediction of substrate deformation during different steps of the lithography process
Chan et al. Quantifying release in step-and-flash imprint lithography
Das et al. Package analysis of 3D-printed piezoresistive strain gauge sensors
Chu et al. Mechanical characterization of SU-8 thin films through varying effective aspect ratios for microelectromechanical systems application
Ban et al. Reduced lifetime of EUV pellicles due to defects