Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Gosselin et al., 2001 - Google Patents

Integrated history-matching of production and 4D seismic data

Gosselin et al., 2001

Document ID
7322298450937109185
Author
Gosselin O
van den Berg S
Cominelli A
Publication year
Publication venue
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition?

External Links

Snippet

The reservoir characterisation methods are still improving the integration of all available data for more accurate predictions, but the history-matching confrontation between observed and simulated data as predicted by the model remains the crucial test. Time-lapse 3D …
Continue reading at onepetro.org (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
    • G01V2210/60—Analysis
    • G01V2210/62—Physical property of subsurface
    • G01V2210/624—Reservoir parameters
    • G01V2210/6248—Pore pressure
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
    • G01V1/30—Analysis
    • G01V1/306—Analysis for determining physical properties of the subsurface, e.g. impedance, porosity or attenuation profiles
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
    • G01V2210/60—Analysis
    • G01V2210/61—Analysis by combining or comparing a seismic data set with other data
    • G01V2210/614—Synthetically generated data
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
    • G01V1/282—Application of seismic models, synthetic seismograms
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/003—Seismic data acquisition in general, e.g. survey design
    • G01V1/005—Seismic data acquisition in general, e.g. survey design with exploration systems emitting special signals, e.g. frequency swept signals, pulse sequences or slip sweep arrangements
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
    • G01V2210/60—Analysis
    • G01V2210/66—Subsurface modeling
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
    • G01V99/005—Geomodels or geomodelling, not related to particular measurements
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V11/00—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS prospecting or detecting by methods combining techniques covered by two or more of main groups G01V1/00 - G01V9/00
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
    • G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11520077B2 (en) Automated reservoir modeling using deep generative networks
Gosselin et al. History matching using time-lapse seismic (HUTS)
Cannon Reservoir modelling: A practical guide
Cacas et al. Nested geological modelling of naturally fractured reservoirs
Gosselin et al. Integrated history-matching of production and 4D seismic data
Grana et al. Bayesian inversion of time‐lapse seismic data for the estimation of static reservoir properties and dynamic property changes
Gunter et al. Overview of an integrated process model to develop petrophysical based reservoir descriptions
Dong et al. Quantitative use of 4D seismic data for reservoir description
Ouenes et al. Integrated fractured reservoir modeling using both discrete and continuum approaches
Will et al. Integration of seismic anisotropy and reservoir-performance data for characterization of naturally fractured reservoirs using discrete-feature-network models
Feraille et al. Application of advanced history matching techniques to an integrated field case study
Chambers et al. Petroleum geostatistics for nongeostaticians: Part 2
Kjelstadli et al. Quantitative history match of 4D seismic response and production data in the Valhall field
Rushing et al. An Integrated Work-Flow Model to Characterize Unconventional Gas Resources: Part II—Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Modeling
Nazari Ostad et al. 3D modeling of geomechanical elastic properties in a carbonate-sandstone reservoir: a comparative study of geostatistical co-simulation methods
Falcone et al. Petroelastic modelling as key element of 4D history matching: a field example
Barman et al. Fractured reservoir characterization using streamline-based inverse modeling and artificial intelligence tools
Stephen et al. Reducing reservoir prediction uncertainty by updating a stochastic model using seismic history matching
Haverl et al. Integrated workflow for quantitative use of time-lapse seismic data in history matching: A North Sea field case
Deutsch et al. Geostatistical modeling of permeability with annealing cosimulation (ACS)
Stephen et al. Reducing reservoir prediction uncertainty using seismic history matching
Geng et al. Seismic history matching using a fast-track simulator to seismic proxy
Varela et al. On the value of 3D seismic amplitude data to reduce uncertainty in the forecast of reservoir production
Gringarten Evolution of reservoir management techniques: From independent methods to an integrated methodology. Impact on petroleum engineering curriculum, graduate teaching and competitive advantage of oil companies
Hamdi et al. Calibrating multi-point geostatistical models using pressure transient data