Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Ramos et al., 2022 - Google Patents

Working with dynamic earthquake rupture models: A practical guide

Ramos et al., 2022

View PDF
Document ID
7253363608928865731
Author
Ramos M
Thakur P
Huang Y
Harris R
Ryan K
Publication year
Publication venue
Seismological Society of America

External Links

Snippet

Dynamic rupture models are physics‐based simulations that couple fracture mechanics to wave propagation and are used to explain specific earthquake observations or to generate a suite of predictions to understand the influence of frictional, geometrical, stress, and material …
Continue reading at par.nsf.gov (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
    • G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
    • G06F17/5018—Computer-aided design using simulation using finite difference methods or finite element methods
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • G06F3/03—Arrangements for converting the position or the displacement of a member into a coded form
    • G06F3/041—Digitisers, e.g. for touch screens or touch pads, characterized by the transducing means
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
    • G01V2210/60—Analysis
    • G01V2210/67—Wave propagation modeling
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
    • G01V1/282—Application of seismic models, synthetic seismograms
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/003—Seismic data acquisition in general, e.g. survey design
    • G01V1/005—Seismic data acquisition in general, e.g. survey design with exploration systems emitting special signals, e.g. frequency swept signals, pulse sequences or slip sweep arrangements
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
    • G01V1/30—Analysis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
    • G01V99/005—Geomodels or geomodelling, not related to particular measurements
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/40—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for well-logging
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/16—Receiving elements for seismic signals; Arrangements or adaptations of receiving elements
    • G01V1/18—Receiving elements, e.g. seismometer, geophone or torque detectors, for localised single point measurements
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
    • G01V2210/30—Noise handling
    • G01V2210/32—Noise reduction
    • G01V2210/322—Trace stacking
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2217/00—Indexing scheme relating to computer aided design [CAD]
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V11/00—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS prospecting or detecting by methods combining techniques covered by two or more of main groups G01V1/00 - G01V9/00
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N3/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N3/30—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying a single impulsive force, e.g. by falling weight
    • G01N3/313—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying a single impulsive force, e.g. by falling weight generated by explosives

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ramos et al. Working with dynamic earthquake rupture models: A practical guide
Okubo et al. Dynamics, radiation, and overall energy budget of earthquake rupture with coseismic off‐fault damage
Harris et al. A suite of exercises for verifying dynamic earthquake rupture codes
McCallen et al. EQSIM—A multidisciplinary framework for fault-to-structure earthquake simulations on exascale computers part I: Computational models and workflow
Pelties et al. Three‐dimensional dynamic rupture simulation with a high‐order discontinuous Galerkin method on unstructured tetrahedral meshes
Quintal et al. Quasi‐static finite element modeling of seismic attenuation and dispersion due to wave‐induced fluid flow in poroelastic media
Vishnevsky et al. Numerical study of the interface errors of finite-difference simulations of seismic waves
Huang et al. Earthquake ruptures modulated by waves in damaged fault zones
Templeton et al. Off‐fault plasticity and earthquake rupture dynamics: 1. Dry materials or neglect of fluid pressure changes
Poursartip et al. Large-scale simulation of seismic wave motion: A review
Käser et al. A highly accurate discontinuous Galerkin method for complex interfaces between solids and moving fluids
Ryan et al. Dynamically modeling fault step overs using various friction laws
Frehner Krauklis wave initiation in fluid-filled fractures by seismic body waves
Carcione et al. Theory and simulation of time-fractional fluid diffusion in porous media
Frehner et al. Finite-element simulations of Stoneley guided-wave reflection and scattering at the tips of fluid-filled fractures
Fang et al. Sensitivity analysis of fracture scattering
Abdelmeguid et al. A novel hybrid finite element‐spectral boundary integral scheme for modeling earthquake cycles: Application to rate and state faults with low‐velocity zones
Huang Earthquake rupture in fault zones with along‐strike material heterogeneity
Cheng et al. Hydro‐micromechanical modeling of wave propagation in saturated granular crystals
Savran et al. Kinematic rupture generator based on 3‐D spontaneous rupture simulations along geometrically rough faults
Wolf et al. An efficient ADER-DG local time stepping scheme for 3D HPC simulation of seismic waves in poroelastic media
O’Brien et al. A lattice Boltzmann method for elastic wave propagation in a poisson solid
Konuk et al. Tensorial elastodynamics for anisotropic media
O'Reilly et al. Simulation of earthquake rupture dynamics in complex geometries using coupled finite difference and finite volume methods
Templeton et al. Finite element simulations of dynamic shear rupture experiments and dynamic path selection along kinked and branched faults