Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Chan et al., 2011 - Google Patents

The accuracy of optical scanning: influence of convergence and die preparation

Chan et al., 2011

View PDF
Document ID
7193787134176243201
Author
Chan D
Chung A
Haines J
Yau E
Kuo C
Publication year
Publication venue
Operative dentistry

External Links

Snippet

The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of the data acquisition and modeling process of laser and white light scanners by evaluating the reproducibility of digitized simulated crowns with different convergences. A secondary purpose was to …
Continue reading at meridian.allenpress.com (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0004—Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
    • A61C9/004—Means or methods for taking digitized impressions
    • A61C9/0046—Data acquisition means or methods
    • A61C9/0053—Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam
    • A61C9/006—Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam projecting one or more stripes or patterns on the teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0022—Blanks or green, unfinished dental restoration parts
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/0059—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons using light, e.g. diagnosis by transillumination, diascopy, fluorescence
    • A61B5/0082—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons using light, e.g. diagnosis by transillumination, diascopy, fluorescence adapted for particular medical purposes
    • A61B5/0088—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons using light, e.g. diagnosis by transillumination, diascopy, fluorescence adapted for particular medical purposes for oral or dental tissue
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00—Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/33—Heterocyclic compounds
    • A61K31/395—Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine, rifamycins
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/0059—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons using light, e.g. diagnosis by transillumination, diascopy, fluorescence
    • A61B5/0062—Arrangements for scanning
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
    • G01B11/00—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical means
    • G01B11/24—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical means for measuring contours or curvatures
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4538—Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
    • A61B5/4542—Evaluating the mouth, e.g. the jaw
    • A61B5/4547—Evaluating teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/14—Applications or adaptations for dentistry

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Chan et al. The accuracy of optical scanning: influence of convergence and die preparation
de Villaumbrosia et al. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies
Schaefer et al. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro
Mandelli et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of extraoral laboratory scanners with a single-tooth abutment model: A 3D analysis
Imburgia et al. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study
Sason et al. A comparative evaluation of intraoral and extraoral digital impressions: An: in vivo: study
Ender et al. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions
Richert et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression
Wong et al. Three‐dimensional accuracy of digital static interocclusal registration by three intraoral scanner systems
Kohorst et al. Marginal accuracy of four‐unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing systems
Azarbal et al. Marginal fit comparison of CAD/CAM crowns milled from two different materials
Nedelcu et al. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis
JP5875972B2 (en) Dental CAD / CAM equipment
Seelbach et al. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow
Solaberrieta et al. Intraoral digital impressions for virtual occlusal records: section quantity and dimensions
Borba et al. Evaluation of the adaptation of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures using micro-CT technology
Schneider et al. Comparison between clinical and digital soft tissue measurements
Perry et al. Composite restoration wear analysis: conventional methods vs. three-dimensional laser digitizer
Denissen et al. Measurement of the Margins of Partial-Coverage Tooth Preparations for CAD/CAM.
Cakmak et al. Comparison of measured deviations in digital implant scans depending on software and operator
Joós-Kovács et al. Trueness of CAD/CAM digitization with a desktop scanner–an in vitro study
Piedra-Cascón et al. Scanning accuracy of nondental structured light extraoral scanners compared with that of a dental-specific scanner
Amornvit et al. Studying the optical 3D accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vitro study
Waldecker et al. In vitro accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in the partially edentulous maxilla
Hasanzade et al. Comparison of three-dimensional digital technique with two-dimensional replica method for measuring marginal and internal fit of full coverage restorations