Schopphoven et al., 2019 - Google Patents
Breast phantoms for 2D digital mammography with realistic anatomical structures and attenuation characteristics based on clinical images using 3D printingSchopphoven et al., 2019
- Document ID
- 6889656469832172439
- Author
- Schopphoven S
- Cavael P
- Bock K
- Fiebich M
- Mäder U
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Physics in Medicine & Biology
External Links
Snippet
Breast phantoms for 2D digital mammography with realistic anatomical structures and attenuation
characteristics based on clinical images using 3D printing - IOPscience Skip to content IOP
Science home Accessibility Help Search all IOPscience content Search Article Lookup Select …
- 210000000481 Breast 0 title abstract description 45
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30004—Biomedical image processing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
- G06T7/0012—Biomedical image inspection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
- G06T2207/10116—X-ray image
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/50—Clinical applications
- A61B6/502—Clinical applications involving diagnosis of breast, i.e. mammography
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/58—Testing, adjusting or calibrating devices for radiation diagnosis
- A61B6/582—Calibration
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/48—Diagnostic techniques
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T11/00—2D [Two Dimensional] image generation
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Schopphoven et al. | Breast phantoms for 2D digital mammography with realistic anatomical structures and attenuation characteristics based on clinical images using 3D printing | |
Kiarashi et al. | Development of realistic physical breast phantoms matched to virtual breast phantoms based on human subject data | |
Glick et al. | Advances in digital and physical anthropomorphic breast phantoms for x‐ray imaging | |
Elangovan et al. | Design and validation of realistic breast models for use in multiple alternative forced choice virtual clinical trials | |
Li et al. | Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data | |
Shaheen et al. | The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis | |
Elangovan et al. | Development and validation of a modelling framework for simulating 2D-mammography and breast tomosynthesis images | |
Hadjipanteli et al. | The effect of system geometry and dose on the threshold detectable calcification diameter in 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis | |
Saunders et al. | Simulation of mammographic lesions | |
Michell et al. | Role of tomosynthesis in breast imaging going forward | |
Ikejimba et al. | Assessment of task‐based performance from five clinical DBT systems using an anthropomorphic breast phantom | |
Hadjipanteli et al. | The threshold detectable mass diameter for 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis | |
Cockmartin et al. | Comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography using a hybrid performance test | |
Caballo et al. | Towards 4D dedicated breast CT perfusion imaging of cancer: development and validation of computer simulated images | |
Wei et al. | Synthesizing mammogram from digital breast tomosynthesis | |
Marshall et al. | Performance evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis systems: comparison of current virtual clinical trial methods | |
Fedon et al. | Monte Carlo study on optimal breast voxel resolution for dosimetry estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis | |
Elangovan et al. | Lesion detectability in 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using different targets and observers | |
Clark et al. | Reproducing 2D breast mammography images with 3D printed phantoms | |
Elangovan et al. | Performance comparison of breast imaging modalities using a 4AFC human observer study | |
Mackenzie et al. | Effect of glandularity on the detection of simulated cancers in planar, tomosynthesis, and synthetic 2D imaging of the breast using a hybrid virtual clinical trial | |
Tomal | Mammography phantoms | |
Carton et al. | Development of a 3D high-resolution physical anthropomorphic breast phantom | |
Lakshmanan et al. | Accuracy assessment and characterization of x-ray coded aperture coherent scatter spectral imaging for breast cancer classification | |
Marimón et al. | A semi-empirical model for scatter field reduction in digital mammography |