Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Del Corso et al., 2009 - Google Patents

Optical three‐dimensional scanning acquisition of the position of osseointegrated implants: an in vitro study to determine method accuracy and operational feasibility

Del Corso et al., 2009

View PDF
Document ID
6836912307095053062
Author
Del Corso M
Abà G
Vazquez L
Dargaud J
Ehrenfest D
Publication year
Publication venue
Clinical implant dentistry and related research

External Links

Snippet

Purpose: Manufacturing complex prosthetic framework on osseointegrated implants requires precision at every step of execution. The purpose of this study was to verify the possibility of applying the technology of image acquisition to determine the spatial position of …
Continue reading at www.academia.edu (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0004—Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
    • G01B11/00—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical means
    • G01B11/24—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical means for measuring contours or curvatures
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/0059—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons using light, e.g. diagnosis by transillumination, diascopy, fluorescence
    • A61B5/0062—Arrangements for scanning
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/58—Testing, adjusting or calibrating devices for radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/582—Calibration
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Del Corso et al. Optical three‐dimensional scanning acquisition of the position of osseointegrated implants: an in vitro study to determine method accuracy and operational feasibility
Amornvit et al. Comparison of accuracy of current ten intraoral scanners
Alsharbaty et al. A clinical comparative study of 3‐dimensional accuracy between digital and conventional implant impression techniques
Keul et al. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison
Güth et al. A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro
Güth et al. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing
Güth et al. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization
Papaspyridakos et al. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non‐splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study
Fluegge et al. A novel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scan bodies—An experimental approach
Holst et al. A new triple-scan protocol for 3D fit assessment of dental restorations.
Kohorst et al. Marginal accuracy of four‐unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing systems
Seelbach et al. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow
Kohorst et al. Different CAD/CAM-processing routes for zirconia restorations: influence on fitting accuracy
Ashraf et al. Influence of preparation type and tooth geometry on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners
Ireland et al. 3D surface imaging in dentistry–what we are looking at
Mutwalli et al. Trueness and precision of three‐dimensional digitizing intraoral devices
Mühlemann et al. Precision of digital implant models compared to conventional implant models for posterior single implant crowns: A within‐subject comparison
Unkovskiy et al. Additive manufacturing: a comparative analysis of dimensional accuracy and skin texture reproduction of auricular prostheses replicas
Banjar et al. Accuracy of 3D printed implant casts versus stone casts: a comparative study in the anterior maxilla
Yee et al. Three‐dimensional static articulation accuracy of virtual models–part i: system trueness and precision
Yuan et al. Accuracy evaluation of a new three-dimensional reproduction method of edentulous dental casts, and wax occlusion rims with jaw relation
Amornvit et al. Studying the optical 3D accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vitro study
Hilgenfeld et al. In vivo accuracy of tooth surface reconstruction based on CBCT and dental MRI—a clinical pilot study
Jeon et al. Trueness and precision of scanning abutment impressions and stone models according to dental CAD/CAM evaluation standards
Holst et al. A technique for in vitro fit assessment of multi-unit screw-retained implant restorations: application of a triple-scan protocol