Pauls et al., 2022 - Google Patents
Real-time cooperative motion planning using efficient model predictive contouring controlPauls et al., 2022
- Document ID
- 5930947892672768006
- Author
- Pauls J
- Boxheimer M
- Stiller C
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
External Links
Snippet
Currently, there is a gap in motion planning approaches. On the one hand, there are optimization-based motion planning techniques which can guarantee safety and feasibility, but are either slow and cooperative or fast and uncooperative. On the other hand, there are …
- 239000000203 mixture 0 abstract description 38
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/0265—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion
- G05B13/027—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion using neural networks only
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course or altitude of land, water, air, or space vehicles, e.g. automatic pilot
- G05D1/02—Control of position or course in two dimensions
- G05D1/021—Control of position or course in two dimensions specially adapted to land vehicles
- G05D1/0287—Control of position or course in two dimensions specially adapted to land vehicles involving a plurality of land vehicles, e.g. fleet or convoy travelling
- G05D1/0291—Fleet control
- G05D1/0295—Fleet control by at least one leading vehicle of the fleet
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
- G05B2219/33—Director till display
- G05B2219/33053—Modular hardware, software, easy modification, expansion, generic, oop
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computer systems based on biological models
- G06N3/02—Computer systems based on biological models using neural network models
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Sharma et al. | Recent advances in motion and behavior planning techniques for software architecture of autonomous vehicles: A state-of-the-art survey | |
Mo et al. | Safe reinforcement learning for autonomous vehicle using monte carlo tree search | |
Pamosoaji et al. | PSO-based minimum-time motion planning for multiple vehicles under acceleration and velocity limitations | |
Duan et al. | Cooperative lane-change motion planning for connected and automated vehicle platoons in multi-lane scenarios | |
Zhang et al. | A survey of energy-efficient motion planning for wheeled mobile robots | |
Lin et al. | Policy iteration based approximate dynamic programming toward autonomous driving in constrained dynamic environment | |
Pauls et al. | Real-time cooperative motion planning using efficient model predictive contouring control | |
Li et al. | Marc: Multipolicy and risk-aware contingency planning for autonomous driving | |
Askari et al. | Sampling-based nonlinear MPC of neural network dynamics with application to autonomous vehicle motion planning | |
Sun et al. | Interactive left-turning of autonomous vehicles at uncontrolled intersections | |
Cheng et al. | Hierarchical MPC-based motion planning for automated vehicles in parallel autonomy | |
Németh et al. | Hierarchical motion control strategies for handling interactions of automated vehicles | |
Wang et al. | An online collision-free trajectory generation algorithm for human–robot collaboration | |
Zhang et al. | A Hierarchical Multi-Vehicle Coordinated Motion Planning Method based on Interactive Spatio-Temporal Corridors | |
Guo et al. | A survey of trajectory planning methods for autonomous driving—Part I: Unstructured scenarios | |
Krontiris et al. | Multi-level formation roadmaps for collision-free dynamic shape changes with non-holonomic teams | |
Hou et al. | Hybrid residual multiexpert reinforcement learning for spatial scheduling of high-density parking lots | |
Zhang et al. | An efficient planning method based on deep reinforcement learning with hybrid actions for autonomous driving on highway | |
Bekris et al. | Safe and distributed kinodynamic replanning for vehicular networks | |
Lienke et al. | Core components of automated driving–algorithms for situation analysis, decision-making, and trajectory planning | |
Li et al. | A unified trajectory planning and tracking control framework for autonomous overtaking based on hierarchical mpc | |
Qiu et al. | Applications and challenges of deep reinforcement learning in multi-robot path planning | |
Smit et al. | Informed sampling-based trajectory planner for automated driving in dynamic urban environments | |
Huang et al. | General Optimal Trajectory Planning: Enabling Autonomous Vehicles with the Principle of Least Action | |
Hao et al. | A Review of Intelligence-Based Vehicles Path Planning |